Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 45 references

Toward High Accuracy DME for Alternative Aircraft Positioning: SFOL Pulse Transmission in High-Power DME

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper shows that a commercial 1000 W Gaussian-pulse DME can transmit the multipath-resistant SFOL24 pulse within all ICAO and FAA specifications by combining a spectrally tightened pulse variant with TSVD-regularized digital…

desk verdict A credible engineering demonstration that a software-only pulse redesign plus TSVD-DPD can push an SFOL-like pulse through a 1000 W DME within spec, but the rank was chosen on the same data that 'pass' — worth refereeing, needs an honest validation pass. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.06614 v1 pith:FBSDTRXJ submitted 2025-06-07 eess.SP

Jongmin Park , Seowoo Park , Sunghwa Lee , Jiwon Seo , Euiho Kim This is my paper · ORCID
classification eess.SP
keywords SFOLpulseDMEdigitalpredistortiontruncatedsingularvaluedecompositionmultipathmitigationalternativepositionnavigationandtimingaircraftpositioning
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper sets out to show that existing high-power (1000 W) DME ground transponders, which are built to transmit Gaussian pulses, can also transmit a multipath-resistant SFOL-style pulse without violating the ICAO and FAA signal specifications. The obstacle is that SFOL pulses already sit close to the spectral limits, and a high-power transmitter adds a significantly higher noise floor than the low-power (100 W) units previously tested, so conventional predistortion pushes the pulse out of compliance. The authors' solution combines a redesigned SFOL24 pulse, re-optimized with a tightened spectral constraint, and a digital predistorter whose coefficient estimation is regularized with truncated singular value decomposition. On a commercial 1000 W testbed, the transmitted SFOL24 pulses satisfied every tested specification while keeping multipath-induced range error near 9.2 m RMS, compared with 26.1 m for the Gaussian pulse. The point of the work is that higher-accuracy DME-based navigation could be achieved through software upgrades to existing infrastructure.

What carries the argument

The two load-bearing mechanisms are the SFOL24 pulse and the TSVD-regularized predistorter. SFOL24 is a pulse shape designed by a genetic algorithm: it keeps SFOL17's steep rising edge, which is what suppresses multipath-induced timing errors, but smooths the falling edge and cuts the theoretical ERP at 0.8 MHz offset from 22.0 to 15.5 dBm, creating headroom for the noise and distortion of a high-power transmitter. The predistorter is a memory-polynomial model of the power amplifier whose coefficients are estimated by truncated singular value decomposition: instead of inverting an ill-conditioned matrix with all its singular values, only the $r$ largest are retained, which makes the estimate robust to the high noise floor. The value of this pipeline is that both pulse design and predistortion are software-side changes; the transmitter hardware is untouched.

What would settle it

Run the identical DPD configuration (including $r=12$) on a second 1000 W DME transponder of the same model without re-tuning; if the transmitted SFOL24 pulse exceeds the 23.0 dBm ERP limit at 0.8 MHz offset, the central generalizability claim is falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a Gaussian-pulse-based DME can transmit an SFOL-like pulse in high-power mode, within all DME specifications, if the pulse shape is re-optimized with extra spectral margin and the predistorter is regularized. The paper renames the earlier SFOL pulse SFOL17 and introduces SFOL24, generated by a genetic algorithm that starts from SFOL17 and tightens the fitness constraint at 0.8 MHz offset from 23.0 dBm to 16.0 dBm; the resulting pulse keeps the steep rising edge that suppresses multipath while lowering its theoretical ERP to 15.5 dBm. The second ingredient is digital predistortion via truncated singular value decomposition: the memory-polynomial coefficient matrix is solved with only the largest $r$ singular values retained, so small singular values that amplify transmitter noise are discarded; in this testbed, every compliant parameter set used $r=12$. With both strategies, the transmitted SFOL24 pulses satisfied ICAO and FAA pulse-shape limits and power-spectrum ERP limits, and their measured multipath-induced range errors were 9.2--9.7 m RMS, a 62.8--64.8% reduction from the 26.1 m RMS of a Gaussian pulse.

Load-bearing premise

The measured compliance on one commercial transponder is taken as representative of high-power DME operation, even though the DPD rank $r=12$ was chosen from these same measurements with no repeatability or unit-to-unit variation reported.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Existing 1000 W DME ground stations can adopt SFOL24 through software changes alone, avoiding hardware replacement.
  • Multipath-induced ranging error falls from 26.1 m RMS (Gaussian) to about 9.2--9.7 m RMS for the transmitted SFOL24 pulses, a reduction of roughly 65 percent.
  • The SFOL24 pulse satisfies both ICAO and FAA pulse-shape and spectrum limits, whereas the earlier SFOL17 in low-power mode only met the ICAO shape limits.
  • The TSVD-regularized DPD approach should be applicable to other high-power transmitters with elevated noise floors where conventional DPD fails.
  • The tightened-spectrum design method provides a way to future-proof DME pulse designs against specification margins.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A fixed rank $r=12$ may be specific to this transmitter; other 1000 W units may need their own rank selection, and an automatic rule based on condition number or noise floor would make the method portable.
  • The multipath performance numbers come from a single multipath model (peak ratio 0.3, delays to 6 microseconds); field measurements at real airports would be the next test of the claimed accuracy gain.
  • Since the transmitted SFOL24 waveform is known and stable, airborne interrogators could additionally use a matched filter tuned to SFOL24, which might yield further ranging improvements beyond the transmit-side changes alone.
  • The same genetic-algorithm-plus-TSVD recipe could be applied to design other constrained waveforms with even larger spectral margins for other avionics signals with strict spectral masks.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper addresses the problem of transmitting a multipath-resistant SFOL pulse from a 1000 W Gaussian-pulse-based DME while staying within ICAO/FAA DME spectrum and pulse-shape limits. It proposes two changes: a new SFOL24 pulse designed by genetic algorithm with tightened ERP constraints (15.5 dBm at ±0.8 MHz instead of 22.0 dBm for SFOL17), and TSVD regularization in the existing memory-polynomial DPD parameter estimation. Experimental results on a commercial MOPIENS transponder show that with M=2, K=7–12, and TSVD rank r=12, the transmitted SFOL24 pulses meet the spectrum and both ICAO/FAA pulse-shape specifications; multipath-induced range errors are 9.2–9.7 m RMS versus 26.1 m for the theoretical Gaussian pulse. The authors conclude that high-accuracy SFOL DME can be retrofitted with minimal disruption.

Significance. If the results hold beyond the specific testbed, the paper offers a credible incremental path toward multipath-robust DME/APNT using existing infrastructure. Strengths include real measurements on a commercial 1000 W transponder, a clear tabulation of all measured compliance points (Tables X–XII), and a concrete TSVD recipe with an explicit rank parameter. The main limitation is that the decisive TSVD rank is selected post hoc from the same compliance sweep on one unit, with no repeatability or independent validation; the paper's broad claim of 'ensuring compliance' therefore outruns the evidence. The theoretical SFOL24 design and multipath-error comparison are useful independent contributions.

major comments (3)
  1. [§IV-B and Table X] The rank r=12 is selected from the same data used to assert compliance. The paper reports that DPD was designed and tested for all ranks 1≤r≤KM+1 for each (K,M), and Table X lists only the parameter sets that passed, with r=12 the only rank passing for every K. Because successful parameter sets are reported and the selection rule is not fixed a priori, the reported pass/fail pattern cannot be read as a validation of the method. This matters quantitatively: the tightest retained margin is K=12 at −2.0 MHz (2.1 dBm measured vs 3.0 dBm limit, a 0.9 dB cushion), and Section II reports total NSR of 49.70 for the high-power path, indicating substantial run-to-run variability. The manuscript should validate the frozen parameter set on independent fresh measurements and report repeated trials and at least one additional transponder before claiming that the strategy enables SFOL transmission in high-power DMEs generally.
  2. [§IV-A and abstract/conclusion] The 'software-only' framing is not yet demonstrated inside the transponder. In the testbed, the laptop generates the predistorted waveform u(n) externally and the transponder simply transmits it; the paper does not show that the commercial transponder's internal software can load or apply the predistorter coefficients. The claimed cost-effective integration into existing high-power DME systems depends on this integration path, so the paper should either demonstrate the predistorter running inside the transponder or clearly scope the claim to external predistortion.
  3. [§IV-A and Tables V/X] The spectrum compliance measurement is not sufficiently specified. The DME limit is a maximum ERP in a 0.5 MHz band at offsets of ±0.8 and ±2.0 MHz, but the paper does not state the spectrum analyzer resolution/video bandwidth, detector, averaging, or how the attenuator-referred measurement is calibrated to ERP at the antenna. Without these details, the dBm values in Tables V and X cannot be independently checked against the specification.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Table VII] The ICAO fall-time entry should read 3.0(+0.5,−0.5) rather than 3.0( 0.5,−0.5), matching Tables II and IV.
  2. [§III-B, Eqs. (10)–(12)] The notation is ambiguous about when Y denotes the full matrix versus the truncated matrix Yr; after introducing TSVD, the update and parameter-estimation equations should explicitly use the truncated version to show that the inversion is regularized.
  3. [Table X] The row labeled 'Theoretical pulse' lists ideal values, not measurements; the caption should state this explicitly so readers do not confuse it with a passing measurement.
  4. [§II-B, Eq. (1)] The definition of NSR uses 100 transmitted pulses, but the total NSR sum is later evaluated over N=500 samples; please clarify that the 100 pulses are the ensemble and N is the number of time samples per pulse.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the core claims are experimental demonstrations against external ICAO/FAA DME specifications, not predictions derived from their own inputs.

full rationale

The paper's central result is an empirical compliance demonstration: a commercial 1000 W DME transponder is measured against external ICAO/FAA power-spectrum and pulse-shape limits, so the pass/fail outcome cannot be manufactured by the model alone. The SFOL24 pulse is transparently described as a genetic-algorithm design output with a tightened ERP fitness target; its theoretical ERP margin is therefore a design consequence, not an independent prediction, and the paper does not present it otherwise. The TSVD rank r=12 is selected from the same compliance sweep in Table X, which is a generalization and overfitting risk rather than a circular step: the paper reports the measured compliance of the swept parameter sets and explicitly qualifies the result as 'in our testbed.' Self-citations to [24], [32], and [34] supply the SFOL17 pulse and baseline DPD technique, but these are published, externally checkable building blocks and are not invoked as a uniqueness theorem or as a substitute for the new measurements. No equation, fitted parameter, or cited result is equivalent by construction to a claimed prediction, so the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the external DME standards, standard linear algebra for TSVD, and a multipath model from prior work. The only fitted number that controls the headline compliance result is the TSVD rank r, chosen post hoc; the genetic algorithm's ERP target preset the theoretical spectral ERP. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • TSVD rank r = 12
    Selected post hoc because the measured spectrum satisfied the DME specification only when r=12, across all tested nonlinearity orders K. No independent validation or uncertainty analysis is provided.
  • ERP target in GA fitness function = 16 dBm at 0.8 MHz offset
    Engineering choice tightened from the 23 dBm specification. This target directly determines the theoretical SFOL24 ERP of 15.5 dBm, so the theoretical ERP margin is a designed property.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption DME power spectrum and pulse shape specifications as defined by ICAO and FAA are the correct compliance criteria for evaluating the transmitted pulses.
    The paper's success criterion is defined entirely by these external standards; no alternative or additional metrics are considered.
  • standard math Truncated singular value decomposition reduces noise sensitivity in ill-conditioned least squares problems.
    Invoked in Section III-B to justify replacing the pseudo-inverse of Y with a low-rank approximation in the DPD parameter estimation.
  • domain assumption The single-ray multipath model m(t, phi, delta) = alpha cos(phi) y(t - delta), with alpha = 0.3 and delays up to 6 microseconds, captures the multipath environment relevant to DME ranging.
    Used to compute the multipath-induced range error reductions in Section III-A and Table XII. The model is inherited from prior work [32] and is not validated with real multipath measurements in this paper.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Toward High Accuracy DME for Alternative Aircraft Positioning: SFOL Pulse Transmission in High-Power DME." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FBSDTRXJ

@misc{pith2026250606614,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Toward High Accuracy DME for Alternative Aircraft Positioning: SFOL Pulse Transmission in High-Power DME},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FBSDTRXJ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.06614}
}
read the original abstract

The Stretched-FrOnt-Leg (SFOL) pulse is an advanced distance measuring equipment (DME) pulse that offers superior ranging accuracy compared to conventional Gaussian pulses. Successful SFOL pulse transmission has been recently demonstrated from a commercial Gaussian pulse-based DME in low-power mode utilizing digital predistortion (DPD) techniques for power amplifiers. These adjustments were achieved through software modifications, enabling SFOL integration without replacing existing DME infrastructure. However, the SFOL pulse is designed to optimize ranging capabilities by leveraging the effective radiated power (ERP) and pulse shape parameters permitted within DME specifications. Consequently, it operates with narrow margins against these specifications, potentially leading to non-compliance when transmitted in high-power mode. This paper introduces strategies to enable a Gaussian pulse-based DME to transmit the SFOL pulse while adhering to DME specifications in high-power mode. The proposed strategies involve use of a variant of the SFOL pulse and DPD techniques utilizing truncated singular value decomposition, tailored for high-power DME operations. Test results, conducted on a testbed utilizing a commercial Gaussian pulse-based DME, demonstrate the effectiveness of these strategies, ensuring compliance with DME specifications in high-power mode with minimal performance loss. This study enables cost-effective integration of high-accuracy SFOL pulses into existing high-power DME systems, enhancing aircraft positioning precision while ensuring compliance with industry standards.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.06614 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Comparison between the SFOL and Gaussian pulses. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Overview of the challenges and proposed strategies for transmitting SFOL pulses in high-power DMEs. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Block diagram of DPD for DME in a previous study (reproduced [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (9 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Normalized output versus input magnitudes in (a) low-power DME (reproduced from Fig. 2 of [34]) and (b) high-power DME. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Mean of the transmitted SFOL17 pulses from low- and high-power [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Overall process of the genetic algorithm used to develop the SFOL17 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Comparison of SFOL17 and SFOL24 pulse shapes. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Comparison of the ideal ERPs of undistorted SFOL17 and SFOL24 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Comparison of the multipath-induced range errors of the SFOL17 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: (a) Laboratory testbed setup and (b) corresponding block diagram. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Comparison of the theoretical and transmitted SFOL24 pulses. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Comparison of the multipath-induced range errors of the transmitted [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_13.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 45 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Chen et al

    Y . Chen et al. An LSTM-assisted GNSS/INS integration system using IMU recom- puted error information for train localization IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst., vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 2658–2671, 2024

    work page 2024

  2. [2]

    Budtho, P

    J. Budtho, P. Supnithi, N. Siansawasdi, S. Saito, A. Saekow, and L. M. M. Myint Ground facility error analysis and GBAS performance evaluation around Suvarnabhumi airport, Thailand IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. , vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 537–547, 2024

    work page 2024

  3. [3]

    Causa and G

    F. Causa and G. Fasano Improving navigation in GNSS-challenging environments: Multi-UAS cooperation and generalized dilution of precision IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst., vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 1462–1479, June 2021

    work page 2021

  4. [4]

    H. Lee, S. Pullen, J. Lee, B. Park, M. Yoon, and J. Seo Optimal parameter inflation to enhance the availability of single- frequency GBAS for intelligent air transportation IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. , vol. 23, no. 10, pp. 17 801–17 808, Oct. 2022

    work page 2022

  5. [5]

    M. Jia, H. Lee, J. Khalife, Z. M. Kassas, and J. Seo Ground vehicle navigation integrity monitoring for multi-constellation GNSS fused with cellular signals of opportunity In Proc. IEEE ITSC , 2021, pp. 3978–3983

    work page 2021

  6. [6]

    Sabatini, T

    R. Sabatini, T. Moore, and S. Ramasamy Global navigation satellite systems performance analysis and augmen- tation strategies in aviation Prog. Aerosp. Sci., vol. 95, pp. 45–98, 2017

    work page 2017

  7. [7]

    A. Reda, T. Mekkawy, T. A. Tsiftsis, and A. Mahran IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AEROSPACE AND ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS 10 Deep learning approach for GNSS jamming detection-based PCA and Bayesian optimization feature selection algorithm IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst., vol. 60, no. 6, pp. 8349–8363, 2024

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    Park and J

    K. Park and J. Seo Single-antenna-based GPS antijamming method exploiting polarization diversity IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. , vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 919–934, Apr. 2021

    work page 2021

Show all 45 references
  1. [9]

    Liang, C

    X. Liang, C. Milner, C. Macabiau, P. Estival, and P. Zhao Performance-based multi-DME station selection IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst., vol. 60, no. 5, pp. 6299–6312, 2024

    2024

  2. [10]

    Luo et al

    Y . Luo et al. Zak-transform-based adaptive interference extraction method for GNSS interference mitigation IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst., vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 4784–4793, 2024

    2024

  3. [11]

    P. Wang, E. Cetin, A. G. Dempster, Y . Wang, and S. Wu GNSS interference detection using statistical analysis in the time- frequency domain IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. , vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 416–428, 2018

    2018

  4. [12]

    H. Moon, H. Park, and J. Seo HELPS for emergency location service: Hyper-enhanced local position- ing system IEEE Wirel. Commun., vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 276–282, 2024

    2024

  5. [13]

    H. Lee, J. Seo, and Z. Kassas Urban road safety prediction: A satellite navigation perspective IEEE Intell. Transp. Syst. Mag. , vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 94–106, Nov.-Dec. 2022

    2022

  6. [14]

    Kim, P.-W

    W. Kim, P.-W. Son, S. G. Park, S. H. Park, and J. Seo First demonstration of the Korean eLoran accuracy in a narrow waterway using improved ASF maps IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst., vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 1492–1496, Apr. 2022

    2022

  7. [15]

    P.-W. Son, J. Rhee, and J. Seo Novel multichain-based Loran positioning algorithm for resilient navi- gation IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. , vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 666–679, Oct. 2018

    2018

  8. [16]

    J. Lee, Y . Morton, J. Lee, H.-S. Moon, and J. Seo Monitoring and mitigation of ionospheric anomalies for GNSS-based safety critical systems IEEE Signal Process. Mag. , vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 96–110, Sep. 2017

    2017

  9. [17]

    Department of Transportation, Washington, DC, USA, Tech

    Federal Aviation Administration Performance-based navigation (PBN) national airspace system (NAS) navigation strategy 2016 U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC, USA, Tech. Rep., 2016

    2016

  10. [18]

    Espen, M

    M. Espen, M. Sch ¨afer, V . Vitan, G. Berz, R. Eichhorn, and J. Schmitt Old but gold: Evaluating the accuracy and integrity of DME based on real-world measurements In Proc. IEEE/AIAA DASC, 2024, pp. 1–10

    2024

  11. [19]

    Ostroumov et al

    I. Ostroumov et al. Modelling and simulation of DME navigation global service volume Adv. Space Res. , vol. 68, no. 8, pp. 3495–3507, 2021

    2021

  12. [20]

    Lawrence FAA navigation programs update Presented at the Civil GPS Service Interface Committee (CGSIC), Sep

    D. Lawrence FAA navigation programs update Presented at the Civil GPS Service Interface Committee (CGSIC), Sep. 2024

    2024

  13. [21]

    M. Liu, J. Lai, Z. Li, and J. Liu An adaptive cubature Kalman filter algorithm for inertial and land-based navigation system Aerosp. Sci. Technol., vol. 51, pp. 52–60, 2016

    2016

  14. [22]

    Hirsch Pulse-multiplex system for distance-measuring equipment (DME) Proc

    C. Hirsch Pulse-multiplex system for distance-measuring equipment (DME) Proc. IRE, vol. 37, no. 11, pp. 1236–1242, 1949

    1949

  15. [23]

    H. Yan, Y . Li, Y . Meng, and H. Xiao A novel DME pulse waveform for EMC optimization with L-DACS1 In Proc. ACES-China, August 2023, pp. 1–3

    2023

  16. [24]

    Kim Improving DME performance for APNT using alternative pulse and multipath mitigation IEEE Trans

    E. Kim Improving DME performance for APNT using alternative pulse and multipath mitigation IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. , vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 877–887, April 2017

    2017

  17. [25]

    Tripathi and S

    V . Tripathi and S. Caizzone Power absorbing structure for multipath suppression in DME applica- tions In Proc. ION ITM, Long Beach, California, January 2024, pp. 998–1006

    2024

  18. [26]

    Kim Multipath mitigation for pulses using supervised learning: Application to distance measuring equipment J

    E. Kim Multipath mitigation for pulses using supervised learning: Application to distance measuring equipment J. Position. Navig. Timing, vol. 5, pp. 173–180, 12 2016

    2016

  19. [27]

    Du and Q

    S. Du and Q. Jia Performance analysis of DME multipath interference monitoring for APNT applications J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. , vol. 2849, p. 012020, 09 2024

    2024

  20. [28]

    D ˇzunda and L

    M. D ˇzunda and L. Meln ´ıkov´a The influence of narrowband interference on DME system operation Aerospace, vol. 10, no. 8, 2023

    2023

  21. [29]

    Lo et al

    S. Lo et al. Containing a difficult target: Techniques for mitigating DME multipath to alternative position navigation and timing (APNT) In Proc. ION ITM , January 2014, pp. 413–423

    2014

  22. [30]

    Li and W

    K. Li and W. Pelgrum Enhanced DME carrier phase: Concepts, implementation, and flight-test results J. Navig., vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 209–220, August 2013

    2013

  23. [31]

    Kim Alternative DME/N pulse shape for APNT In Proc

    E. Kim Alternative DME/N pulse shape for APNT In Proc. IEEE/AIAA DASC, 2013, pp. 4D2–1–4D2–10

    2013

  24. [32]

    Kim and J

    E. Kim and J. Seo SFOL pulse: A high accuracy DME pulse for alternative aircraft position and navigation Sensors, vol. 17, no. 10, Sep. 2017

    2017

  25. [33]

    R. P. Terman Electronic and Radio Engineering . McGraw Hill, 1964

    1964

  26. [34]

    S. Lee, E. Kim, and J. Seo SFOL DME pulse shaping through digital predistortion for high- accuracy DME IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst., vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 2616–2620, Jun. 2022

    2022

  27. [35]

    A. Zhu, P. J. Draxler, J. J. Yan, T. J. Brazil, D. F. Kimball, and P. M. Asbeck Open-loop digital predistorter for RF power amplifiers using dynamic deviation reduction-based volterra series IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., vol. 56, no. 7, pp. 1524–1534, 2008

    2008

  28. [36]

    Ding et al

    L. Ding et al. A robust digital baseband predistorter constructed using memory poly- nomials IEEE Trans. Commun. , vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 159–165, 2004

    2004

  29. [37]

    Morgan, Z

    D. Morgan, Z. Ma, J. Kim, M. Zierdt, and J. Pastalan A generalized memory polynomial model for digital predistortion of RF power amplifiers IEEE Trans. Signal Process , vol. 54, no. 10, pp. 3852–3860, 2006

    2006

  30. [38]

    F. F. Tafuri, C. Guaragnella, M. Fiore, and T. Larsen Linearization of RF power amplifiers using an enhanced memory polynomial predistorter In Proc. NORCHIP, 2012, pp. 1–4

    2012

  31. [39]

    D. Chen, Y . Zhao, Y . Zhou, Q. Ji, Z. Chen, and F. Tian Modified generalized memory polynomial model of rf power amplifiers In Proc. IEEE ICEICT , 2021, pp. 317–319

    2021

  32. [40]

    Rep., 2023

    International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) Annex 10—Aeronautical Telecommunications—V olume I—Radio Nav- igational Aids ICAO, Montr´eal, Quebec, Canada, Tech. Rep., 2023

    2023

  33. [41]

    Department of Transportation, Washington, DC, USA, Tech

    Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Performance specification distance measuring equipment (DME) U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC, USA, Tech. Rep. FAA-E-37016, 2021

    2021

  34. [42]

    P. L. Gilabert, R. N. Braithwaite, and G. Montoro Beyond the Moore-Penrose inverse: Strategies for the estimation of digital predistortion linearization parameters IEEE Microw. Mag., vol. 21, no. 12, pp. 34–46, 2020

    2020

  35. [43]

    P. C. Hansen The truncatedSVD as a method for regularization BIT, vol. 27, no. 4, p. 534–553, Dec. 1987

    1987

  36. [44]

    Z. Chen, L. Qin, S. Zhao, T. H. Chan, and A. Nguyen Toward efficacy of piecewise polynomial truncated singular value de- composition algorithm in moving force identification Adv. Struct. Eng., vol. 22, no. 12, pp. 2687–2698, 2019

    2019

  37. [45]

    Balatti, H

    D. Balatti, H. Haddad Khodaparast, M. I. Friswell, M. Manolesos, and A. Castrichini Aircraft turbulence and gust identification using simulated in-flight data Aerosp. Sci. Technol., vol. 115, p. 106805, 2021

    2021

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.