Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 44 references

Weak and mild solutions to the MHD equations and the viscoelastic Navier-Stokes equations with damping in Wiener amalgam spaces

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper proves global weak solutions for MHD and damped viscoelastic flows in Wiener amalgam spaces, extending the Navier–Stokes theory.

desk verdict The MHD half is a real contribution; the viscoelastic half is unproved, and the paper as a whole is not ready as stated. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.06621 v1 pith:X24KMGUI submitted 2025-06-07 math.AP

Chen-Chih Lai This is my paper
classification math.AP MSC 35Q3035Q3535D3076D0576W05
keywords WieneramalgamspacesMHDequationsviscoelasticNavier-Stokeswithdampinglocalenergysolutionsmildeventualregularityglobalexistenceweak-stronguniqueness
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper extends the Wiener amalgam space theory for the Navier–Stokes equations to two coupled three-dimensional systems: incompressible magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) and the incompressible viscoelastic Navier–Stokes equations with damping. It aims to prove the existence of mild solutions for subcritical and critical data in these spaces, and, more substantially, to construct global-in-time local energy weak solutions for divergence-free initial data in $E^2_q$ with $1 \le q < \infty$, satisfying finite spacetime integral bounds on every finite time interval. If the construction is correct, large or non-decaying initial data whose local $L^2$ mass decays only in an $\ell^q$ sense still produce global weak solutions, with eventual regularity for $1 \le q \le 3$. The same conclusions are asserted for the damped viscoelastic system, with proofs omitted by analogy.

What carries the argument

The carrying object is the Wiener amalgam space $E^p_q$, defined by the norm $\|f\|_{E^p_q} = \| \|f\|_{L^p(B_1(k))} \|_{\ell^q(k \in \mathbb{Z}^3)}$, which blends local integrability with a global $\ell^q$ decay pattern; $E^p_\infty$ is $L^p_{\mathrm{uloc}}$. Two spacetime norms, $L^s_T E^p_q$ and $E^{s,p}_{T,q}$, convert the local-in-space bounds into global-in-time integral estimates. The weak-solution half of the paper is carried by the notion of a local energy solution, whose definition includes a local pressure expansion of the form $\pi = -\Delta^{-1}\mathrm{div}\,\mathrm{div}[(v\otimes v - b\otimes b)\chi_{4R}] + \text{(far-field term)} + c_{x_0,R}(t)$ and a local energy inequality; these are the structures that must survive the limiting arguments. For $q \ge 2$, the proof mechanism is perturbation and restarting; for $1 \le q < 2$, it is a diagonal subsequence of solutions to the localized-regularized equations (3.31), with the pressure representation required to converge at every scale.

What would settle it

For some $1 \le q < 2$ and a fixed scale $R$, exhibit a sequence of regularized solutions $(v_k,b_k,\pi_k)$ to (3.31) whose pressure term $\hat{\pi}^k_{x_0,R}$ fails to converge to $\hat{\pi}_{x_0,R}$ in $L^{3/2}(B_{2R}(x_0)\times(0,T))$; this would break the local pressure expansion and refute Theorem 1.10 for that range. Alternatively, find divergence-free initial data in $E^2_q$ whose diagonal limit violates the local energy inequality on a single cylinder.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that the Wiener amalgam framework carries over from the Navier–Stokes equations to the MHD system and to the damped viscoelastic Navier–Stokes system. For divergence-free $v_0,b_0 \in E^2_q$ with $1 \le q < \infty$, Theorem 1.10 asserts the existence of a time-global local energy solution $(v,b)$ with an associated pressure $\pi$ such that $\|(v,b)\|_{LE_q(0,T)} < \infty$ for every finite $T$, and in particular $(v,b) \in L^\infty(0,T;E^2_q \times E^2_q)$. The proof treats $q \ge 2$ by perturbing the MHD equations and restarting at regular times, and $1 \le q < 2$ by taking a diagonal subsequence of solutions to localized, regularized equations on expanding balls. Along the way the paper establishes eventual and initial regularity, an explicit growth rate for the localized energy, and a uniqueness theorem for data small at high frequencies. Theorem 1.14 states the analogous global existence result for the viscoelastic system with damping.

Load-bearing premise

The proof requires that the local pressure formula and the local energy inequality pass unchanged to the weak limits built in Section 3.3 at every ball scale, and it assumes the viscoelastic system behaves exactly like MHD even though those proofs are omitted.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For any divergence-free initial data in $E^2_q$ with $1 \le q < \infty$, the MHD equations admit a local energy solution that exists for all positive times and has finite $\ell^q$ local energy on every finite interval.
  • For $1 \le q \le 3$, every such MHD solution becomes regular after a finite time, with a $t^{1/2}$ bound on the $L^\infty$ norm at large times; the same is asserted for the damped viscoelastic system.
  • Small critical data in $E^3_q$ give unique mild solutions with the expected spacetime integral bounds, so data that do not decay at infinity are still well-posed in an appropriate sense.
  • Local energy solutions of MHD are unique when the initial data are small at high frequencies, and this implies short-time uniqueness for data in $E^3$.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same amalgam machinery would likely apply to other coupled parabolic systems whose nonlinearity is a divergence of a quadratic form, such as Boussinesq or Oldroyd-B type models, provided an $\epsilon$-regularity criterion is available.
  • The $1 \le q < 2$ case rests on a delicate diagonal pressure argument; a uniform-in-scale pressure convergence lemma would replace the case-by-scale check and make the existence proof more transparent.
  • The viscoelastic system is handled entirely by analogy, so the claimed global existence is conditional on that analogy; an explicit verification of the local pressure expansion for the vNSEd system would remove the gap.
  • If the theorems hold for every $q < \infty$, the boundary case $q = \infty$ (locally square-integrable data with no global decay) remains the natural place to test whether the method can be pushed further.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies the three-dimensional incompressible MHD equations and the incompressible viscoelastic Navier–Stokes equations with damping (vNSEd) in Wiener amalgam spaces E^p_q. For the MHD system it proves: local well-posedness of mild solutions in subcritical spaces (Theorem 1.1), in critical spaces with small data (Theorem 1.2), and in critical spaces with sufficiently decaying data (Theorem 1.3); and for local energy weak solutions it proves eventual regularity (Theorem 1.8), an explicit growth-rate estimate for the local energy (Theorem 1.9), and time-global existence of local energy solutions for divergence-free data in E^2_q, 1≤q<∞ (Theorem 1.10). Theorems 1.4–1.6 and 1.12–1.14 state the analogous results for the vNSEd system, but their proofs are explicitly omitted in Sections 2 and 3. The MHD proofs adapt the semigroup, interpolation, and epsilon-regularity machinery of Bradshaw–Lai–Tsai and Bradshaw–Tsai to the coupled (v,b) system, with a separate construction for q≥2 via a perturbed system and for 1≤q<2 via localized regularized equations and a diagonal subsequence argument.

Significance. If the claims are correct, the paper extends the Wiener amalgam framework from the Navier–Stokes equations to two coupled fluid models, giving mild solutions with spacetime integral bounds and time-global local energy solutions for data in E^2_q. The MHD results are presented in considerable detail and rely on the previously published estimates of [1,3,4], which are adapted rather than re-derived; this is a strength because the main technical work is explicit. A serious limitation is that the vNSEd theorems, which are advertised in the abstract as part of the paper's central contribution, are not proved at all. Since the vNSEd system is not a literal relabeling of MHD (the velocity equation contains a sum over columns and the local energy inequality and pressure expansion have column-sum structure), the analogy argument needs a written verification before the viscoelastic claims can be accepted. With the MHD part alone the paper is a substantial progress report; with the vNSEd part it is currently incomplete.

major comments (3)
  1. [§2 and §3, Theorems 1.4–1.6 and 1.12–1.14] The proofs of all six viscoelastic main theorems are omitted. Section 2 states 'The proofs of Theorems 1.4, 1.5, and 1.6 for (vNSEd) are omitted for brevity', and Section 3 states 'The details of verification of Theorems 1.12, 1.13, 1.14 for (vNSEd) are left to the readers.' This is not a harmless bookkeeping omission: the vNSEd velocity equation in (1.18) contains the sum ∑_n f_n⊗f_n, the pressure expansion (1.32) contains ∑_n f_n⊗f_n, and the local energy inequality (1.33) contains the column-sum term −2∑_n (v·f_n)(f_n·∇φ). The MHD estimates and the weak-limit construction in Section 3.3.2 are written for a single magnetic field b; transferring them to the tensor F requires at minimum verifying the analogous a priori bounds, the pressure decomposition, and the survival of the local energy inequality under the regularized limits for the column-sum structure. Since the abstract advertises existence results for both systems, these theorems are load-bearing and their proofs must be supplied or the claims must be restricted to the MHD system.
  2. [Lemma 3.9, Eq. (3.32)] The linearized term L_t^(2)(v_ǫ,b_ǫ) in the integral equation (3.32) does not match the second equation of the perturbed system (3.30) or (3.34). The displayed formula contains both '+ b_ǫ⊗(η_ǫ*u)' and '− b_ǫ⊗(η_ǫ*u)', which cancel, and it omits the term '− v_ǫ⊗(η_ǫ*a)' that is required by the linearization. As written, the right-hand side of the b-equation reduces to (η_ǫ*u)⊗b_ǫ − (η_ǫ*a)⊗v_ǫ, missing both the b_ǫ⊗(η_ǫ*u) and v_ǫ⊗(η_ǫ*a) contributions that appear in (3.30). Since Lemma 3.9 is used in the q≥2 global-existence construction of Section 3.3.1, this incorrect formula needs to be corrected and the estimates below it rechecked against the correct integral equation.
  3. [Theorem 1.10, proof for 1≤q<2, §3.3.2] The diagonal-limit argument asserts that the local pressure expansion and the local energy inequality are inherited by the limiting solution, but the verification is compressed into the sentence 'The local energy inequality follows from the local energy equality for (v_k,b_k) and π_k, and (3.67), (3.68), (3.69), and π̂_n(x,t)=π(x,t)−c_n(t)'. This is a nontrivial step: the pressure representation (1.27) is defined at every scale, yet the compactness statements (3.67)–(3.68) are obtained on expanding balls B_n, and the far-field pressure tail is handled by choosing M large after fixing the scale. For a complete proof, the author should explain explicitly why the scale-by-scale pressure convergence in (3.68) is uniform enough to pass to the limit in the local energy inequality for all cylinders, rather than only on the fixed diagonal sequence. As written, the global existence claim for 1≤q<2 depends on this unstated uniformity.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Definition 1.11] In the paragraph after Definition 1.11, the set of local energy solutions is denoted 'N_MHD(v0,F0)' but should be 'N_vNSEd(v0,F0)'.
  2. [Theorem 1.3, conditions (1.16) and (1.17)] Theorem 1.3 says 'Instead of (1.25), if we assume ...' but equation (1.25) belongs to Theorem 1.6 for the viscoelastic system; the reference should be to condition (1.16) in the same theorem. In addition, (1.16) states 'm>p′' while (1.17) uses 'm≥p′'; please clarify whether this difference is intentional.
  3. [Lemma 3.2, epsilon-regularity criterion] The displayed criterion in Lemma 3.2 contains a duplicated term: it reads '|v|^3 + |v|^3 + |π|^{3/2}' but should be '|v|^3 + |b|^3 + |π|^{3/2}'.
  4. [Theorems 1.2 and 1.5, Eq. (1.14) and (1.23)] The symbol '/BD' appearing in both displayed estimates is a corrupted artifact; the intended conditional indicator for the case q≤s should be typeset properly so the statement is unambiguous.
  5. [Section 3.3.1, Lemma 3.10] In the first sentence of the proof of Lemma 3.10, the text says 'where c0 is given in Lemma 3.11'; the reference should be to Lemma 3.10, which is the lemma whose constants are being used.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: all load-bearing estimates are imported from prior independent works; the unproved vNSEd theorems are a completeness limitation, not circularity.

full rationale

After walking the claimed derivation chain, I find no step that meets the evidentiary standard for circularity. The MHD mild-solution theorems (Theorems 1.1, 1.2, 1.3) are proved by adapting lemmas from Bradshaw, Lai, and Tsai [1] and Bradshaw and Tsai [3,4]; these are prior published results with independent proofs, and the imported linear, bilinear, and smoothing estimates are not the target theorems, so the self-citations are real evidence rather than a circular reduction. The local-energy arguments in Section 3 prove the needed a priori bounds (Lemmas 3.7, 3.8) and compactness steps rather than assuming the conclusion. There are no fitted parameters or data-driven predictions, so no prediction reduces to an input by construction. Two explicit limitations should be weighed separately from circularity. Section 2 states: 'Since the structure of (vNSEd) is analogous to that of (MHD), we prove Theorems 1.1, 1.2, and 1.3 for (MHD). The proofs of Theorems 1.4, 1.5, and 1.6 for (vNSEd) are omitted for brevity.' Section 3 states: 'The details of verification of Theorems 1.12, 1.13, 1.14 for (vNSEd) are left to the readers.' These passages mean the viscoelastic claims are unsupported as written, which is a correctness and completeness risk, not a circular derivation. Similarly, the 1 <= q < 2 pressure-convergence step in Section 3.3.2 asserts the limit (3.68) after term-by-term estimates; no reduction to inputs is exhibited. I therefore find no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted to data; all constants are universal or depend on norms. The main assumptions are imported theorems from prior literature, the structural analogy between MHD and viscoelastic Navier-Stokes with damping, and the choice mu = 1. No new physical entities are introduced.

assumptions (5)
  • standard math Heat semigroup and Oseen kernel estimates hold in E_p^q amalgam norms as stated in [1, Lemma 2.1, 2.4, 2.7, 2.8].
    Invoked throughout Section 2 for the linear and bilinear estimates in Theorems 1.1-1.3.
  • domain assumption The epsilon-regularity criterion of Mahalov-Nicolaenko-Shilkin [34, Theorem 3.1] applies to MHD suitable weak solutions satisfying the local energy inequality.
    Used in Lemma 3.2 and Theorem 3.3 for initial and eventual regularity; it is imported from the MHD literature.
  • domain assumption The local energy solution definitions and localized pressure expansions (1.27) and (1.32) are valid for MHD and viscoelastic Navier-Stokes systems.
    Definitions 1.7 and 1.11 assume these representations; the compactness arguments must preserve them in the limit.
  • ad hoc to paper For the viscoelastic Navier-Stokes system, the damping parameter can be set to mu = 1 because it does not affect the analysis.
    Stated in Section 2 after (1.2); all viscoelastic results are proved only for mu = 1.
  • domain assumption If div F = 0 initially, then div F = 0 for all later times, so the viscoelastic system can be written columnwise with divergence-free columns.
    Derived from (1.2) before the vNSEd system; used to treat each column like a magnetic field.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Weak and mild solutions to the MHD equations and the viscoelastic Navier-Stokes equations with damping in Wiener amalgam spaces." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/X24KMGUI

@misc{pith2026250606621,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Weak and mild solutions to the MHD equations and the viscoelastic Navier-Stokes equations with damping in Wiener amalgam spaces},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/X24KMGUI}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.06621}
}
abstract

We study the three-dimensional incompressible magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) equations and the incompressible viscoelastic Navier-Stokes equations with damping. Building on techniques developed by Bradshaw, Lai, and Tsai (Math. Ann. 2024), we prove the existence of mild solutions in Wiener amalgam spaces that satisfy the corresponding spacetime integral bounds. In addition, we construct global-in-time local energy weak solutions in these amalgam spaces using the framework introduced by Bradshaw and Tsai (SIAM J. Math. Anal. 2021). As part of this construction, we also establish several properties of local energy solutions with $L^2_{\rm uloc}$ initial data, including initial and eventual regularity as well as small-large uniqueness, extending analogous results obtained for the Navier-Stokes equations by Bradshaw and Tsai (Comm. Partial Differential Equations 2020).

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references · 44 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Bradshaw, C.-C

    Z. Bradshaw, C.-C. Lai, and T.-P. Tsai. Mild solutions an d spacetime integral bounds for Stokes and Navier-Stokes flows in Wiener amalgam spaces. Math. Ann. , 388(3):3053–3126, 2024

    work page 2024

  2. [2]

    Bradshaw and T.-P

    Z. Bradshaw and T.-P. Tsai. Forward discretely self-sim ilar solutions of the Navier-Stokes equations II. Ann. Henri Poincar´ e, 18(3):1095–1119, 2017

    work page 2017

  3. [3]

    Bradshaw and T.-P

    Z. Bradshaw and T.-P. Tsai. Global existence, regularit y, and uniqueness of infinite energy solutions to the Navier-Stokes equations. Comm. Partial Differential Equations , 45(9):1168– 1201, 2020

    work page 2020

  4. [4]

    Bradshaw and T.-P

    Z. Bradshaw and T.-P. Tsai. Local energy solutions to the Navier-Stokes equations in Wiener amalgam spaces. SIAM J. Math. Anal. , 53(2):1993–2026, 2021

    work page 1993

  5. [5]

    Bradshaw and T.-P

    Z. Bradshaw and T.-P. Tsai. On the local pressure expansi on for the Navier–Stokes equations. J. Math. Fluid Mech. , 24:1–32, 2022

    work page 2022

  6. [6]

    Caffarelli, R

    L. Caffarelli, R. Kohn, and L. Nirenberg. Partial regulari ty of suitable weak solutions of the Navier-Stokes equations. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. , 35(6):771–831, 1982

    work page 1982

  7. [7]

    Cao and J

    C. Cao and J. Wu. Two regularity criteria for the 3D MHD equ ations. J. Differential Equations, 248(9):2263–2274, 2010

    work page 2010

  8. [8]

    Chamorro, F

    D. Chamorro, F. Cortez, J. He, and O. Jarr ´ ın. On the local regularity theory for the magne- tohydrodynamic equations. Doc. Math. , 26:125–148, 2021

    work page 2021

Show all 44 references
  1. [9]

    Q. Chen, C. Miao, and Z. Zhang. On the regularity criterio n of weak solution for the 3D viscous magneto-hydrodynamics equations. Comm. Math. Phys. , 284:919–930, 2008. 65

    2008

  2. [10]

    Chen and P

    Y. Chen and P. Zhang. The global existence of small solut ions to the incompressible vis- coelastic fluid system in 2 and 3 space dimensions. Comm. Partial Differential Equations , 31(10-12):1793–1810, 2006

    2006

  3. [11]

    Duvaut and J.-L

    G. Duvaut and J.-L. Lions. In´ equations en thermo´ elasticit´ e et magn´ etohydrodynamique.Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. , 46:241–279, 1972

    1972

  4. [12]

    P. G. Fern´ andez-Dalgo and O. Jarr ´ ın. Discretely self-similar solutions for 3D MHD equations and global weak solutions in weighted L2 spaces. J. Math. Fluid Mech. , 23(1):Paper No. 22, 30, 2021

    2021

  5. [13]

    P. G. Fern´ andez-Dalgo and O. Jarr ´ ın. Weak-strong uniqueness in weighted L2 spaces and weak suitable solutions in local Morrey spaces for the MHD equati ons. J. Differential Equations , 271:864–915, 2021

    2021

  6. [14]

    Y. Giga, K. Inui, and S. Matsui. On the cauchy problem for the Navier-Stokes equations with nondecaying initial data. Quad. Mat. , 4:28–68, 1999

    1999

  7. [15]

    He and Z

    C. He and Z. Xin. Partial regularity of suitable weak sol utions to the incompressible magne- tohydrodynamic equations. J. Funct. Anal. , 227(1):113–152, 2005

    2005

  8. [16]

    He and Z

    C. He and Z. Xin. On the self-similar solutions of the mag neto-hydro-dynamic equations. Acta Math. Sci. Ser. B (Engl. Ed.) , 29(3):583–598, 2009

    2009

  9. [17]

    R. Hynd. Partial regularity of weak solutions of the vis coelastic Navier-Stokes equations with damping. SIAM J. Math. Anal. , 45(2):495–517, 2013

    2013

  10. [18]

    K. Kang, B. Lai, C.-C. Lai, and T.-P. Tsai. The Green tens or of the nonstationary Stokes system in the half space. Comm. Math. Phys. , 399(2):1291–1372, 2023

    2023

  11. [19]

    Kang and J

    K. Kang and J. Lee. Interior regularity criteria for sui table weak solutions of the magnetohy- drodynamic equations. J. Differential Equations , 247(8):2310–2330, 2009

    2009

  12. [20]

    K. Kang, H. Miura, and T.-P. Tsai. Short time regularity of Navier–Stokes flows with locally L3 initial data and applications. Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN , 2021(11):8763–8805, 2021

    2021

  13. [21]

    Kikuchi and G

    N. Kikuchi and G. Seregin. Weak solutions to the Cauchy p roblem for the Navier-Stokes equations satisfying the local energy inequality. In Nonlinear equations and spectral theory , volume 220 of Amer. Math. Soc. Transl. Ser. 2 , pages 141–164. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2007

    2007

  14. [22]

    J.-M. Kim. On regularity criteria of weak solutions to t he 3D viscoelastic Navier-Stokes equations with damping. Appl. Math. Lett. , 69:153–160, 2017

    2017

  15. [23]

    Kwon and T.-P

    H. Kwon and T.-P. Tsai. Global Navier–Stokes flows for no n-decaying initial data with slowly decaying oscillation. Comm. Math. Phys. , 375(3):1665–1715, 2020

    2020

  16. [24]

    B. Lai, J. Lin, and C. Wang. Forward self-similar soluti ons to the viscoelastic Navier-Stokes equation with damping. SIAM J. Math. Anal. , 49(1):501–529, 2017

    2017

  17. [25]

    C.-C. Lai. Forward discretely self-similar solutions of the MHD equations and the viscoelastic Navier-Stokes equations with damping. J. Math. Fluid Mech. , 21(3):Paper No. 38, 28, 2019. 66

    2019

  18. [26]

    Z. Lei, C. Liu, and Y. Zhou. Global solutions for incompr essible viscoelastic fluids. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. , 188(3):371–398, 2008

    2008

  19. [27]

    P. G. Lemari´ e-Rieusset. Recent developments in the Navier-Stokes problem , volume 431 of Chapman & Hall/CRC Research Notes in Mathematics . Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL, 2002

    2002

  20. [28]

    F. Lin. A new proof of the Caffarelli-Kohn-Nirenberg theo rem. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. , 51(3):241–257, 1998

    1998

  21. [29]

    F.-H. Lin, C. Liu, and P. Zhang. On hydrodynamics of visc oelastic fluids. Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 58(11):1437–1471, 2005

    2005

  22. [30]

    Y. Lin, H. Zhang, and Y. Zhou. Global smooth solutions of MHD equations with large data. J. Differential Equations , 261(1):102–112, 2016

    2016

  23. [31]

    F. Liu, S. Xi, Z. Zeng, and S. Zhu. Global mild solutions t o three-dimensional magnetohydro- dynamic equations in Morrey spaces. J. Differential Equations , 314:752–807, 2022

    2022

  24. [32]

    Liu and X

    M. Liu and X. Lin. Global classical solutions to the elas todynamic equations with damping. J. Inequal. Appl. , 2021(1):88, 2021

    2021

  25. [33]

    Maekawa and Y

    Y. Maekawa and Y. Terasawa. The Navier-Stokes equation s with initial data in uniformly local Lp spaces. Differential Integral Equations , 19(4):369–400, 2006

    2006

  26. [34]

    Mahalov, B

    A. Mahalov, B. Nicolaenko, and T. Shilkin. L3,∞-solutions to the MHD equations. J. Math. Sci, 143:2911–2923, 2007

    2007

  27. [35]

    C. Miao, B. Yuan, and B. Zhang. Well-posedness for the in compressible magneto- hydrodynamic system. Math. Methods Appl. Sci. , 30(8):961–976, 2007

    2007

  28. [36]

    Neˇ cas, M

    J. Neˇ cas, M. R ˚ uˇ ziˇ cka, and V.ˇSver´ ak. On Leray’s self-similar solutions of the Navier-S tokes equations. Acta Math. , 176(2):283–294, 1996

    1996

  29. [37]

    C. W. Oseen. Neuere methoden und ergebnisse in der hydrodynamik , volume 1. Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft, 1927

    1927

  30. [38]

    Sermange and R

    M. Sermange and R. Temam. Some mathematical questions r elated to the MHD equations. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. , 36(5):635–664, 1983

    1983

  31. [39]

    Z. Tan, W. Wu, and J. Zhou. Existence of mild solutions an d regularity criteria of weak solutions to the viscoelastic Navier–Stokes equation with damping. Commun. Math. Sci. , 18(1):205–226, 2020

    2020

  32. [40]

    T.-P. Tsai. Lectures on Navier-Stokes equations , volume 192 of Graduate Studies in Mathe- matics. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2018

    2018

  33. [41]

    J. Wu. Regularity results for weak solutions of the 3D MH D equations. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst, 10(1/2):543–556, 2004

    2004

  34. [42]

    Y. Yang. Forward self-similar solutions to the mhd equa tions in the whole space. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.02601, 2024. 67

    2024 arXiv

  35. [43]

    G. Yue, Z. Pang, and Y. Wu. On the interior regularity cri teria for the viscoelastic fluid system with damping. Adv. Calc. Var. , 18(2):323–338, 2025

    2025

  36. [44]

    Y. Zhou. Remarks on regularities for the 3D MHD equation s. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst , 12(5):881–886, 2005. 68

    2005

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.