Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 65 references

ASKAP-EMU radio continuum detection of planetary nebula NGC 5189: the "Infinity" nebula

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read NGC 5189 is a thermal, optically thin free-free radio source, with a 943 MHz flux of 0.33 Jy and a spectral index of 0.12.

desk verdict Solid ASKAP detection of NGC 5189 at 943 MHz; the spectral index rests on a heterogeneous historical fit, but the thermal optically thin conclusion is not endangered. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.06768 v1 pith:TA536SEA submitted 2025-06-07 astro-ph.GA

A. D. Asher , Z. J. Smeaton , M. D. Filipović , A. M. Hopkins , J. Th. van Loon , T. J. Galvin , L. A. Barnes This is my paper
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords planetarynebulaeradiocontinuumASKAPEMUsurveyspectralindexfree-freeemissionNGC5189opticallythin
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reports that the planetary nebula NGC 5189, nicknamed the 'Infinity' nebula, is detected in radio continuum at 943 MHz in two independent ASKAP-EMU observations with an integrated flux density of $S = 0.33 \pm 0.03$ Jy. Combining these measurements with radio data collected since 1965, the authors derive a spectral index of $\alpha = 0.12 \pm 0.05$, which places the nebula in the optically thin thermal free-free regime. Supporting quantities — a surface brightness of $\Sigma_{1\,\mathrm{GHz}} = 6.0 \times 10^{-21}$ W m$^{-2}$ Hz$^{-1}$ sr$^{-1}$, an optical depth of $\tau = 0.00246$, and an electron density of $N_e = 138$ cm$^{-3}$ — are all consistent with this picture. The 15-arcsecond radio image traces the optical structure seen by HST, including the two inner low-ionisation envelopes regarded as signs of a post common-envelope central binary with a Wolf-Rayet star. The work matters because it gives the highest-resolution radio view of this well-studied nebula to date and ties its radio emission to the physics that shaped it.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing quantity is the radio spectral index, defined by $S \propto \nu^{\alpha}$, fitted here to eleven flux density measurements made between 1965 and 2024 across six decades of frequency. The fit gives $\alpha = 0.12 \pm 0.05$, the discriminant that separates optically thin thermal free-free emission (expected near $\alpha \approx -0.1$) from optically thick or non-thermal emission. From the 943 MHz brightness temperature ($T_B = 24.6$ K), the paper derives the optical depth through $T_B = T(1 - e^{-\tau})$ and then the emission measure and electron density using the free-free opacity formula of Mezger and Henderson, assuming an electron temperature of $10^4$ K and a cylindrical path length equal to the nebula's smallest diameter. The two ASKAP-EMU epochs, with $15'' \times 15''$ resolution and 39 $\mu$Jy beam$^{-1}$ rms noise, supply the anchor measurement and the morphological overlay onto the HST image.

What would settle it

Measure NGC 5189 at frequencies well below 943 MHz, for example between 200 and 400 MHz with the Murchison Widefield Array; if the spectrum does not continue to rise toward lower frequencies as an optically thin free-free source with $\alpha = 0.12$ would predict, the thermal optically thin interpretation is ruled out.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that two independent ASKAP-EMU scheduling blocks, observed on 30 September 2023 and 7 May 2024, detect NGC 5189 at 943 MHz with consistent integrated flux densities of $0.333$ and $0.334$ Jy, reported as $S_{943\,\mathrm{MHz}} = 0.33 \pm 0.03$ Jy at 10% uncertainty. Using eleven of the twelve published flux density measurements spanning 843 MHz to 14.7 GHz, the paper fits a spectral index of $\alpha = 0.12 \pm 0.05$, which it interprets as thermal free-free emission that is optically thin at frequencies around 1 GHz. This interpretation is reinforced by an optical depth of $\tau = 0.00246$ and an electron density of $N_e = 138$ cm$^{-3}$ obtained from the brightness temperature via the Rayleigh-Jeans approximation and the Mezger-Henderson free-free opacity relation. The radio morphology, at a resolution of $15'' \times 15''$, traces the optical emission in the HST WFC3 image, with the inner contours outlining the two low-ionisation envelopes that are characteristic of post common-envelope nebulae surrounding a Wolf-Rayet star.

Load-bearing premise

The spectral index rests on eleven flux density measurements taken over six decades with different telescopes, beam sizes, and calibration standards, so the conclusion of optically thin thermal emission depends on those historical points being on a common flux scale.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the spectral index of 0.12 is correct, NGC 5189 is firmly a thermal, optically thin free-free emitter at radio frequencies around 1 GHz, consistent with its status as an ionised planetary nebula.
  • The two consistent 943 MHz flux measurements establish a reliable modern baseline for monitoring possible slow flux evolution in this object.
  • The radio contours tracing the two inner low-ionisation envelopes provide morphological support for the post common-envelope, Wolf-Rayet central binary interpretation of the nebula's shaping.
  • The measured surface brightness places NGC 5189 well inside the range of Galactic PNe, confirming radio surface brightness as a workable distance-independent diagnostic for these objects.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The unexplained gap between the two PMN 4850 MHz measurements (0.309 Jy versus 0.215 Jy) could be decided by a new high-resolution image at 4.8 GHz, which the paper leaves for future work.
  • The marginal brightening between the 2003 SUMSS point and the 2023 ASKAP point hints at slow flux evolution; two further ASKAP epochs a few years apart would test whether the rise is real.
  • Because the electron density assumes a cylindrical geometry, a realistic three-dimensional reconstruction of this quadrupolar nebula could revise $N_e$ and the optical depth without changing the spectral index conclusion.
  • If the free-free interpretation holds, NGC 5189 should show an optically thick turnover at low frequencies, providing a target for future low-frequency arrays to locate that turnover.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports two ASKAP-EMU observations of the Galactic planetary nebula NGC 5189 at 943 MHz, with integrated flux densities S = 0.333 ± 0.033 Jy (September 2023) and 0.334 ± 0.033 Jy (May 2024). The authors combine these with published and re-measured historical radio flux densities to derive a spectral index α = 0.12 ± 0.05, from which they conclude the nebula is a thermal, optically thin free-free emitter. Additional derived quantities include a spectral luminosity of 8.89 × 10^13 W m^-2 Hz^-1, a surface brightness at 1 GHz of 6.0 × 10^-21 W m^-2 Hz^-1 sr^-1, physical dimensions 1.48 pc × 0.96 pc, an optical depth τ = 0.00246, and an electron density Ne = 138 cm^-3. The paper also overlays the ASKAP radio contours on an HST WFC3 image and identifies two inner low-ionisation structures traced by the radio emission.

Significance. The 943 MHz detection is credible: the two independent epochs agree to about 0.3%, the image rms is 39 µJy beam^-1, and the ASKAP flux is consistent with the 843 MHz Molonglo measurements at the roughly 10% level. The high angular resolution of the ASKAP image provides the cleanest radio morphology of NGC 5189 to date, and the agreement with the HST low-ionisation envelopes is a useful addition. The conclusion that NGC 5189 is an optically thin thermal free-free emitter is consistent with the broad spectral energy distribution and with previous studies. The quantitative claims, however, need attention: the spectral-index fit lacks a systematic error budget, and the reported electron density contains an arithmetic inconsistency that should be fixed before the paper is accepted.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3, Table 1 and Figure 3] The text does not state how the ±0.05 uncertainty on α was computed. If it is the scatter of the fit, it does not include systematic differences between the at least three absolute flux scales involved: Hydra-A for the Parkes and PMN data, the Molonglo scale for SUMSS/MGPS-2, and PKS B1934-638 for ASKAP. One of the two PMN flux densities (0.215 Jy at 4850 MHz) is excluded, and the text says the reason for this value is 'unclear', so the fit is sensitive to a post hoc choice. This does not threaten the broad thermal classification, since even shifts of ±0.2 in α would still be consistent with free-free emission, but the quantitative α quoted in the abstract should either carry a systematic uncertainty or be presented with an explicit caveat.
  2. [§3, Eqs. (2)-(8)] There is an arithmetic inconsistency in the electron-density derivation. With τ = 0.00246, Eq. (6) gives EM = 6630 pc cm^-6. The text then says the path length s is the smallest diameter, 2.2 arcmin, which at 1.5 kpc is s = 0.96 pc. Inserting these values into Eq. (8) gives Ne = sqrt(6630/0.96) ≈ 83 cm^-3, not the reported 138 cm^-3. The value 138 cm^-3 would require s ≈ 0.35 pc, which is not stated or justified. Because Ne appears in the abstract and is used to support the optically thin conclusion, this needs to be corrected or the geometry clarified.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract and §1] The name 'Kwok' is typeset as 'K wok' in several places, and 'Wolf-Rayet' appears as 'W olf-Rayet' in the abstract; these typographical artifacts should be cleaned up.
  2. [§3, PMN and SUMSS remeasurements] The remeasured PMN value 0.310 ± 0.004 Jy quotes only the IMFIT statistical uncertainty; a sentence distinguishing statistical and systematic calibration errors, including the adopted 10% uncertainties on the ASKAP and SUMSS fluxes, would make the table reproducible.
  3. [Figure 3] The excluded PMN measurement is not shown in the figure; displaying it as an open symbol would make the post hoc exclusion transparent.
  4. [§3, R1/R2 flux densities] The integrated flux densities of the inner envelopes R1 and R2 are quoted without uncertainties; an explicit statement on whether the 10% uncertainty applies to these smaller regions is needed.
  5. [References] There are minor reference typos, e.g., 'Pottash' instead of 'Pottasch' and inconsistent accents in 'Filipovic/Filipović'; these should be checked against the original sources.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the ASKAP flux density is a direct measurement, the spectral index is a fit to independent historical data, and the optical-depth/electron-density estimates follow from standard physical relations with adopted canonical inputs.

full rationale

The paper's central claims are (1) a direct ASKAP-EMU detection of NGC 5189 at 943 MHz with S = 0.33 ± 0.03 Jy, and (2) a spectral index α = 0.12 ± 0.05 obtained by fitting eleven published flux-density measurements from 1965–2024. The ASKAP flux density is measured directly from survey images using CARTA and MIRIAD IMFIT; it is not derived from any assumed spectral index or from the historical data. The two ASKAP epochs agree to <1%, which is a repeatability statement, not a circular construction. The spectral index is an ordinary least-squares-type fit to external catalogue values (Parkes, PMN, SUMSS, MGPS-2, and the new ASKAP points); no equation in the paper defines α in terms of the conclusion that the nebula is thermal. The choice to exclude one of the two PMN catalogue values is an explicit data-selection decision discussed in Section 3, and the paper acknowledges the reason for the discrepancy is unclear; this is a potential systematic-error concern, but it is not circularity because the included historical points are independent measurements rather than outputs of the present model. The optical depth τ = 0.00246 and electron density Ne = 138 cm−3 are derived from the measured 943 MHz flux via the Rayleigh–Jeans approximation (Eqs. 2–4) and the Mezger & Henderson free-free opacity formula (Eqs. 5–8), with canonical assumptions (T = 10^4 K, cylindrical geometry with path length equal to the smallest diameter). These equations do not assume the target result: τ and Ne are computed from the measured Sν and adopted geometry, and the conclusion of optical thinness follows from the small computed τ, not from an input constraint. The surface brightness comparison uses an external range from Leverenz et al. and the luminosity uses the independent Chornay & Walton distance; neither step presupposes the thermal conclusion. Self-citations appear only for methodological conventions (e.g., the 10% ASKAP uncertainty level adopted in prior ASKAP-related papers) and are not load-bearing for the central claims; they do not import an unverified uniqueness theorem or ansatz. Finally, the morphological overlap with HST images is a qualitative comparison and does not feed back into the flux or spectral-index derivation.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central numbers are direct measurements, but the derived physical parameters depend on the adopted distance, canonical electron temperature, assumed geometry, and comparability of historical flux scales. No new entities are introduced, and the only hand-picked numerical input is the 10% uncertainty for flux densities.

free parameters (3)
  • Adopted distance to NGC 5189 = 1500 pc
    Taken from Chornay & Walton (2021); converts angular sizes to physical sizes and flux to spectral luminosity.
  • Adopted electron temperature = 10^4 K
    Canonical PN value (Bojičić et al. 2021); used in the optical depth and electron density derivation.
  • Assumed fractional uncertainty for ASKAP and SUMSS flux densities = 10%
    Adopted from earlier ASKAP-EMU papers because CARTA does not output uncertainty levels directly; affects only error bars, not central values.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Historical radio flux densities from 1965 to 2024 are on a sufficiently comparable flux scale to fit a single spectral index
    The fit in Figure 3 uses points from Parkes, PMN, SUMSS, MGPS-2 and ASKAP without rescaling the different absolute calibrations (Hydra-A vs PKS B1934-638).
  • domain assumption Cylindrical geometry with path length equal to the smallest projected diameter
    Used to convert emission measure to electron density in Equation (8).
  • standard math Rayleigh-Jeans approximation is valid at 943 MHz for T ~ 10^4 K
    The paper verifies the condition nu << 21*(T/K) GHz, so the approximation holds.
  • domain assumption Spectral index classification ranges from Ridpath (2018) are correct
    Used to label the source as thermal rather than non-thermal.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of ASKAP-EMU radio continuum detection of planetary nebula NGC 5189: the "Infinity" nebula." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TA536SEA

@misc{pith2026250606768,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: ASKAP-EMU radio continuum detection of planetary nebula NGC 5189: the "Infinity" nebula},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TA536SEA}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.06768}
}
abstract

We report the radio continuum detection of well known Galactic Planetary Nebula (PN) NGC 5189, observed at 943 MHz during the Australian Square Kilometre Array Pathfinder (ASKAP) Evolutionary Map of the Universe (EMU) survey. Two detections of NGC 5189 have been made during the survey, of better resolution than previous radio surveys. Both measurements of the integrated flux density are consistent with each other, at $S_{\rm 943\,MHz} = 0.33\pm0.03$ Jy, and the spectral luminosity is $L_{\rm{943\,MHz}}$ = 8.89 $\times$ 10$^{13}$ W m$^{-2}$ Hz$^{-1}$. Using available flux density measurements for radio-detections of NGC 5189, we calculate a radio surface brightness at 1 GHz and measure $\Sigma_{\rm 1~GHz}$ = 6.0 $\times$ 10$^{-21}$ W m$^{-2}$ Hz$^{-1}$ sr$^{-1}$, which is in the expected range for Galactic PNe. We measure an apparent size of 3.4${'}$ $\times$ 2.2${'}$ corresponding to physical diameters of 1.48 pc $\times$ 0.96 pc, and combine available radio observations of NGC 5189 to estimate a spectral index of $\alpha$ = 0.12 $\pm$ 0.05. Hence, we agree with previous findings that NGC 5189 is a thermal (free-free) emitting nebula. Additional measurements of the optical depth ($\tau = 0.00246$) and electron density ($N_{e} = 138~cm^{-3}$) support our findings that NGC 5189 is optically thin at 943 MHz. Furthermore, the radio contours from the ASKAP-EMU image have been overlaid onto a Hubble Space Telescope (HST) Wide Field Camera 3 image, demonstrating that the radio morphology closely traces the optical. Notably, the contour alignment for the innermost region highlights the two envelopes of gas previously reported to be low-ionisation structures, which is considered a defining feature of post common-envelope PNe that surround a central Wolf-Rayet star.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.06768 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Top: ASKAP–EMU radio image of Infinity at 943 MHz with an rms noise level of 39 µJy beam–1. The contours are at levels of 10, 50, 100, 175, and 200σ. The synthesised beam size is shown in the bottom left corner. Bottom: RGB image of Infinity from HST images, overlaid with ASKAP–EMU radio image contours. Red is the F673N filter (a narrow-band filter centred at 676.59 nm), green is the F606W filter (a wide V band filt… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. A comparison of Infinity observations: the cyan ellipse in both the PMN and ASKAP–EMU images represents the region that was measured during the PMN survey (Griffith & Wright, 1993; Wright et al., 1994; Condon et al., 1993). The central pink polygon in both images represents the Infinity PN from the recent ASKAP observations. the EM and Ne values, we employ the Mezger & Henderson (1967) approximation for the free-fre… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Using 11 of the 12 available radio data points (labelled according to the respective telescope and year of the associated paper or observation), we calculated the radio spectral index for Infinity and determined α = 0.12±0.05, represented by the dashed orange line. Both axes are log scale. For the two ASKAP-EMU data points coloured blue, the survey bandwidth of 288 MHz has been marked with a horizontal line of the s… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: We outline in red the two inner envelopes in the central region of Infinity (which we arbitrarily identify as regions R1 and R2), from which we measure the respective integrated flux densities. Additionally, we measure the apparent size of the inner region containing R…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

65 extracted references · 61 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    F., & Forteza, S

    Aller, A., Lillo-Box, J., Jones, D., Miranda, L. F., & Forteza, S. B. 2020, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 635, A128

    work page 2020

  2. [2]

    H., & Milne, D

    Aller, L. H., & Milne, D. 1972, Australian Journal of Physics, 25, 91

    work page 1972

  3. [3]

    2024, Astrophysics and Space Science, 369, 85

    Asher, A., Filipović, M., Bojičić, I., et al. 2024, Astrophysics and Space Science, 369, 85

    work page 2024

  4. [4]

    2009, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 397, 1386

    Bains, I., Cohen, M., Chapman, J., Deacon, R., & Redman, M. 2009, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 397, 1386

    work page 2009

  5. [5]

    1987, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 227, 161

    Barlow, M. 1987, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 227, 161

    work page 1987

  6. [6]

    2017, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 837, L10

    Bear, E., & Soker, N. 2017, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 837, L10

    work page 2017

  7. [7]

    Bock, D.-J., Large, M., & Sadler, E. M. 1999, The Astronomical Journal, 117, 1578 Bojičić, I., Filipović, M., Urošević, D., Parker, Q., & Galvin, T. 2021, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 503, 2887

    work page 1999

  8. [8]

    2024, Astronomy & Astro- physics, 684, A150

    Burger-Scheidlin, C., Brose, R., Mackey, J., et al. 2024, Astronomy & Astro- physics, 684, A150

    2024

Show all 65 references
  1. [9]

    2017, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 468, 3450

    Cerrigone, L., Umana, G., Trigilio, C., et al. 2017, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 468, 3450

    2017

  2. [10]

    2021, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 656, A110

    Chornay, N., & Walton, N. 2021, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 656, A110

    2021

  3. [11]

    2021, Astrophysics Source Code Library, ascl–2103

    Comrie, A., Wang, K.-S., Hsu, S.-C., et al. 2021, Astrophysics Source Code Library, ascl–2103

    2021

  4. [12]

    1989, The Astronomical Journal, 97, 1064

    Condon, J., Broderick, J., & Seielstad, G. 1989, The Astronomical Journal, 97, 1064

    1989

  5. [13]

    R., & Wright, A

    Condon, J., Griffith, M. R., & Wright, A. E. 1993, The Astronomical Journal, 106, 1095

    1993

  6. [14]

    2024, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 529, 2443

    Cotton, W., Filipović, M., Camilo, F., et al. 2024, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 529, 2443

    2024

  7. [15]

    2010, Journal of Astronomical History and Heritage, 13, 59

    Cozens, G., Walsh, A., & Orchiston, W. 2010, Journal of Astronomical History and Heritage, 13, 59

    2010

  8. [16]

    Crawford, E. J. 2015, PhD thesis, Western Sydney University

    2015

  9. [17]

    1998, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 296, 367 Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia 9

    Crowther, P., De Marco, O., & Barlow, M. 1998, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 296, 367 Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia 9

    1998

  10. [18]

    P., & Montez, R

    Danehkar, A., Karovska, M., Maksym, W. P., & Montez, R. 2018, The Astrophysical Journal, 852, 87

    2018

  11. [19]

    S., & Thackeray, A

    Evans, D. S., & Thackeray, A. D. 1950, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astro- nomical Society, 110, 429 Filipović, M., Cohen, M., Reid, W. A., et al. 2009, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 399, 769

    1950

  12. [20]

    Filipovic, M. D. 1996, PhD thesis, University of Western Sydney, Australia Filipović, M. D., Payne, J. L., Alsaberi, R., et al. 2022, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 512, 265 Filipović, M. D., Dai, S., Arbutina, B., et al. 2023, The Astronomical Journal, 166...

    1996

  13. [21]

    D., Smeaton, Z

    Filipovic, M. D., Smeaton, Z. J., Kothes, R., et al. 2025, Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia, in press

    2025

  14. [22]

    1986, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 157, 171

    Gathier, R., Pottasch, S., & Pel, J. 1986, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 157, 171

    1986

  15. [23]

    R., Goss, W

    Gathier, R., Pottasch, S. R., Goss, W. M., & van Gorkom, J. H. 1983, Astron- omy & Astrophysics, 128, 325

    1983

  16. [24]

    A., & Miller Bertolami, M

    Gesicki, K., Zijlstra, A. A., & Miller Bertolami, M. M. 2018, Nature Astron- omy, 2, 580

    2018

  17. [25]

    1996, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems V, 101, 80

    Gooch, R. 1996, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems V, 101, 80

    1996

  18. [26]

    R., & Wright, A

    Griffith, M. R., & Wright, A. E. 1993, Astronomical Journal, 105, 1666

    1993

  19. [27]

    2007, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 461, 1019

    Gruenwald, R., & Aleman, A. 2007, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 461, 1019

    2007

  20. [28]

    2019, Astrophysics Source Code Library, ascl–1912

    Guzman, J., Whiting, M., V oronkov, M., et al. 2019, Astrophysics Source Code Library, ascl–1912

    2019

  21. [29]

    A., Śniadkowska, K., et al

    Hajduk, M., van Hoof, P. A., Śniadkowska, K., et al. 2018, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 479, 5657

    2018

  22. [30]

    A., Zijlstra, A

    Hajduk, M., van Hoof, P. A., Zijlstra, A. A., et al. 2024, Astronomy & Astro- physics, 688, L21

    2024

  23. [31]

    M., Kapinska, A., Marvil, J., et al

    Hopkins, A. M., Kapinska, A., Marvil, J., et al. 2025, The Evolutionary Map of the Universe: A new radio atlas for the southern hemisphere sky, arXiv:2505.08271

    2025

  24. [32]

    2021, Publications of the Astro- nomical Society of Australia, 38

    Hotan, A., Bunton, J., Chippendale, A., et al. 2021, Publications of the Astro- nomical Society of Australia, 38

    2021

  25. [33]

    2008, Experimental Astronomy, 22, 151 K wok, S

    Johnston, S., Taylor, R., Bailes, M., et al. 2008, Experimental Astronomy, 22, 151 K wok, S. 2001, in Post-AGB Objects as a Phase of Stellar Evolution: Proceed- ings of the Toruń W orkshop held July 5–7, 2000, Springer, 3–10 K wok, S. 2005, Journal of the Korean Astronomical S...

    2008

  26. [34]

    1998, in American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts #192, V ol

    Leckrone, D., Cheng, E., Feinberg, L., et al. 1998, in American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts #192, V ol. 192, 35–08

    1998

  27. [35]

    D., Bojičić, I

    Leverenz, H., Filipović, M. D., Bojičić, I. S., et al. 2016, Astrophysics and Space Science, 361, 108

    2016

  28. [36]

    2015, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 448, 1789

    Manick, R., Miszalski, B., & McBride, V. 2015, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 448, 1789

    2015

  29. [37]

    B., Akras, S., & Gonçalves, D

    Mari, M. B., Akras, S., & Gonçalves, D. R. 2023, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 525, 1998

    2023

  30. [38]

    2024, Wide Field Camera 3 Instrument Handbook, Version 17.0 (Baltimore: STScI)

    Marinelli, M., & Green, J. 2024, Wide Field Camera 3 Instrument Handbook, Version 17.0 (Baltimore: STScI)

    2024

  31. [39]

    M., Snell, R

    Marr, J. M., Snell, R. L., & Kurtz, S. E. 2015, Fundamentals of radio astronomy: observational methods (CRC Press)

    2015

  32. [40]

    2003, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 342, 1117

    Mauch, T., Murphy, T., Buttery, H., et al. 2003, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 342, 1117

    2003

  33. [41]

    1967, Astrophysical Journal, 147, 471

    Mezger, P., & Henderson, A. 1967, Astrophysical Journal, 147, 471

    1967

  34. [42]

    1981, Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia, 4, 156

    Mills, B. 1981, Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia, 4, 156

    1981

  35. [43]

    1979, Astronomy & Astrophysics Supplement Series, 36, 227

    Milne, D. 1979, Astronomy & Astrophysics Supplement Series, 36, 227

    1979

  36. [44]

    Milne, D., & Aller, L. H. 1975, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 38, 183

    1975

  37. [45]

    K., & Aller, L

    Milne, D. K., & Aller, L. H. 1982, Astronomy & Astrophysics, Supplement, 50, 209

    1982

  38. [46]

    2009, Astronomy & Astro- physics, 505, 249

    Miszalski, B., Acker, A., Parker, Q., & Moffat, A. 2009, Astronomy & Astro- physics, 505, 249

    2009

  39. [47]

    2007, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 382, 382

    Murphy, T., Mauch, T., Green, A., et al. 2007, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 382, 382

    2007

  40. [48]

    P., Hopkins, A

    Norris, R. P., Hopkins, A. M., Afonso, J., et al. 2011, Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia, 28, 215

    2011

  41. [49]

    M., van Loon, J

    Pennock, C. M., van Loon, J. T., Filipović, M. D., et al. 2021, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 506, 3540 Pérez-Sánchez, A., Vlemmings, W., Tafoya, D., & Chapman, J. 2013, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters, 436, L79

    2021

  42. [50]

    1983, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 117, 33

    Phillips, J., & Reay, N. 1983, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 117, 33

    1983

  43. [51]

    Pottash, S. R. 1983, Planetary Nebulae: A Study of Late Stages of Stellar Evolution (Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Co.)

    1983

  44. [52]

    2018, A Dictionary of Astronomy (3 ed.) (Oxford University Press, Oxford)

    Ridpath, I. 2018, A Dictionary of Astronomy (3 ed.) (Oxford University Press, Oxford)

    2018

  45. [53]

    1991, Australian Journal of Physics, 44, 729

    Robertson, J. 1991, Australian Journal of Physics, 44, 729

    1991

  46. [54]

    T., & Ramos-Larios, G

    Sabin, L., Vázquez, R., López, J., García-Díaz, M. T., & Ramos-Larios, G. 2012, Revista mexicana de astronomía y astrofísica, 48, 165

    2012

  47. [55]

    2025, A&A, 693, L15

    Sasaki, M., Zangrandi, F., Filipović, M., et al. 2025, A&A, 693, L15

    2025

  48. [56]

    J., Teuben, P., & Wright, M

    Sault, R. J., Teuben, P., & Wright, M. C. 2011, MIRIAD: Multi-channel image reconstruction, image analysis, and display (Astrophysics Source Code Library), ascl–1106

    2011

  49. [57]

    J., Teuben, P

    Sault, R. J., Teuben, P. J., & Wright, M. C. 1995, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems IV, 77, 433

    1995

  50. [58]

    1965, Australian Journal of Physics, 18, 187

    Slee, O., & Orchiston, D. 1965, Australian Journal of Physics, 18, 187

    1965

  51. [59]

    J., Filipović, M

    Smeaton, Z. J., Filipović, M. D., Lazarević, S., et al. 2024b, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 534, 2918 Suárez, O., Gómez, J. F., Bendjoya, P., et al. 2015, The Astrophysical Journal, 806, 105

    2015

  52. [60]

    2022, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 513, 2904

    Tacchella, S., Smith, A., Kannan, R., et al. 2022, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 513, 2904

    2022

  53. [61]

    1987, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 171, 178

    Taylor, A., Pottasch, S., & Zhang, C. 1987, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 171, 178

    1987

  54. [62]

    L., Rohlfs, K., & Hüttemeister, S

    Wilson, T. L., Rohlfs, K., & Hüttemeister, S. 2013, Tools of Radio Astronomy (6th ed.) (Springer)

    2013

  55. [63]

    E., Griffith, M

    Wright, A. E., Griffith, M. R., Burke, B., & Ekers, R. 1994, Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 91, 111

    1994

  56. [64]

    2004, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 351, 935

    Zhang, Y., Liu, X.-W., Wesson, R., et al. 2004, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 351, 935

    2004

  57. [65]

    A., Van Hoof, P

    Zijlstra, A. A., Van Hoof, P. A., Chapman, J. M., & Loup, C. 1994, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 290, 228

    1994

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.