Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 32 references

A Novel Fine Spectral Structure of Solar Radio Bursts with Periodic Beaded Stripes Observed by CBSm of CMP-II

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Solar radio bursts display never-before-seen beaded stripes.

desk verdict A plausible new fine-structure class rests on a single event without instrument-artifact checks; the chained-stripe survey is solid, but the beaded claim needs independent confirmation before it is accepted. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.06819 v1 pith:EBVRVMW4 submitted 2025-06-07 astro-ph.SR

Chuanyang Li , Yao Chen , Bing Wang , Ze Zhong , Baolin Tan , Zongjun Ning , Hao Ning , Xiangliang Kong
show 6 more authors
Shuwang Chang Yanke Tang Ning Gai Li Deng Jingye Yan Fabao Yan
This is my paper
classification astro-ph.SR PACS 96.60.-j96.60.Tf96.60.Rd
keywords solarradioburstsfinespectralstructuresbeadedstripesnarrow-bandtypeIVdoubleplasmaresonancecoronalmagneticfieldMHDwaves
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports a newly identified fine spectral structure in solar radio bursts, which the authors call 'beaded stripes': narrow-band emission stripes that repeat every 0.5–0.8 s and, in some cases, carry periodic bead-like intensity enhancements with a ~0.1 s period and ~0.8 MHz frequency spacing. The structure was recorded by the Chashan broadband solar radio spectrometer on 2024 May 8 during a type IV burst, with similar chained stripes (but no beads) in three other events. The authors argue that each stripe is generated by the double plasma resonance instability and that successive stripes correspond to successive upper-hybrid harmonics, so the observed frequency gap directly measures the electron cyclotron frequency and hence the coronal magnetic field, which they estimate at 0.4–1.8 G. If correct, the discovery turns a spectral pattern into a quantitative diagnostic of coronal magnetic fields and low-frequency wave activity.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the double plasma resonance (DPR) instability, in which energetic electrons with a loss-cone type distribution excite upper-hybrid (UH) waves when the upper-hybrid frequency $\omega_{\mathrm{UH}}$ is nearly an integer multiple of the electron cyclotron frequency, $\omega_{\mathrm{UH}} \approx s\Omega_{\mathrm{ce}}$, in overdense plasma. As $\omega_{\mathrm{pe}}/\Omega_{\mathrm{ce}}$ changes by one unit, the active harmonic switches from $s$ to $s\pm 1$, producing successive stripes; the key identity $\Delta f = \Omega_{\mathrm{ce}}/2\pi$ then converts stripe spacing into magnetic-field strength. The absorption features are attributed to the sharp transition from UH wave amplification to strong damping, and the beaded substructure to the modulation of the growth rate by low-frequency MHD waves with a period near 0.1 s.

What would settle it

Compare simultaneous CBSm and DART dynamic spectra for the May 8, 2024 event: if the beaded stripes do not appear at the same times and frequencies in both instruments, the structure is not a solar emission; if they do, test the DPR interpretation by comparing the 0.4–1.8 G fields derived from the stripe spacing with independent field estimates in the source region.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the May 8, 2024 type IV burst contains a fine structure never reported before: periodic, fairly narrow stripes (bandwidth 2–5 MHz, instantaneous width ~1 MHz, recurrence 0.5–0.8 s) whose low-frequency edges show absorption and whose emission sometimes breaks into beads separated by ~0.8 MHz in frequency and ~0.1 s in time. Using DART imaging, the authors locate the radio source above brightening loops of AR 13664 with brightness temperature above $10^9$ K. They propose that a time-varying plasma density and/or magnetic field sweeps $\omega_{\mathrm{pe}}/\Omega_{\mathrm{ce}}$ across successive integers, so the instability excites successive upper-hybrid harmonics $s\Omega_{\mathrm{ce}}$; each harmonic is a stripe, the absorption is the transition from growth to damping of the upper-hybrid waves, and the beads are modulation of the growth by ~10 Hz MHD waves. This mechanism predicts that the frequency separation between successive stripes equals $\Omega_{\mathrm{ce}}$, giving magnetic fields of 0.4–1.8 G for the four events, and that chains drift with density changes while individual stripes drift with magnetic-field changes.

Load-bearing premise

The argument stands on the assumption that successive stripes are successive upper-hybrid harmonics of the same double-plasma-resonance emission, so the gap between stripes equals the electron cyclotron frequency; if the stripes are independent plasma sources or an instrumental artifact, the derived fields and mechanism collapse.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The beaded stripes add a new category to the known fine structures of type IV bursts, distinguishable from zebra patterns, fiber bursts, and sawtooth chains by the periodic beaded enhancements.
  • If the harmonic interpretation is correct, the frequency spacing of successive stripes measures the coronal magnetic field in the emitting source directly, yielding 0.4–1.8 G for these events.
  • The drift of a stripe chain traces changes in plasma density, while the drift of an individual stripe traces changes in magnetic field strength, allowing time-resolved diagnosis from single dynamic spectra.
  • The ~0.1 s bead period implies ~10 Hz MHD waves in the source, providing a new link between radio fine structure and coronal wave activity.
  • The accompanying ~30% intensity depression at the low-frequency side is a predicted observational signature of upper-hybrid wave damping and should accompany every stripe of this type.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If confirmed, beaded stripes could serve as a coronal magnetometer that complements zebra-pattern diagnostics, potentially unifying several stripe-like fine structures as different regimes of the same DPR instability.
  • The end-to-end alignment of successive stripes and the wave-like chain drift suggest a propagating disturbance; a testable extension would be to model a fast magnetoacoustic or Alfvén wave train with wavelength about twice the source size to see if it reproduces the observed chain spacing.
  • Because only one of the four events shows beads, a systematic survey of archived CBSm spectra could quantify how often beads occur and under what density and magnetic-field conditions, sharpening the proposed MHD modulation mechanism.
  • Registering the stripe frequencies with DART imaging at multiple frequencies could localize the emission height and provide an independent cross-check of the DPR-derived magnetic field against extrapolated loop fields.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper reports a new meter-wavelength fine structure in solar type-IV bursts observed by the CBSm spectrometer: chains of narrow-band stripes with a typical recurrence of 0.5–0.8 s and bandwidths of 2–5 MHz, some of which show periodic beaded intensity enhancements with ~0.1 s temporal and ~0.8 MHz frequency spacing. The May 8, 2024 event is analyzed in detail, with DART imaging giving brightness temperatures above 1e9 K over AR 13664 and NLFFF extrapolation indicating a complex multi-loop topology. The authors interpret the chains as successive upper-hybrid harmonics excited by the double plasma resonance (DPR) instability as omega_pe/Omega_ce drifts by unity, and attribute the beads to modulation by ~10 Hz MHD waves. Three additional CBSm events are presented as similar chained-stripe cases without beads. The paper explicitly claims that beaded stripes are reported for the first time.

Significance. The observational claim, if validated, defines a genuinely new class of solar radio fine structure and provides a fresh diagnostic window on coronal density and magnetic-field variations on sub-second time scales. The combination of high-resolution CBSm spectra with DART imaging and NLFFF context is a strength, as is the explicit recognition that the exact MHD mode cannot be identified with the current data. The paper also states its limitations openly, including the absence of a quantitative growth-rate model. However, the central new feature rests on a single visually identified event, the quoted parameters lack uncertainty estimates, and the DPR-based diagnostic is partly circular. These issues must be addressed before the novelty claim and the derived magnetic-field values can be accepted.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 3.2, Figs. 3(c)-3(e), Fig. 5, Fig. 6] The defining beaded substructure is quantified only by visual inspection of a single CBSm event. The quoted bead parameters (~0.1 s temporal period, ~0.8 MHz frequency spacing, ~0.6 MHz bandwidth) are not accompanied by uncertainties, a detection threshold relative to the noise level, or a comparison with off-burst quiet-Sun data. Because a ~10 Hz amplitude modulation combined with an ~0.8 MHz spectral ripple is exactly the pattern that receiver gain ripple or a digital spectral artifact could imprint on a drifting stripe, the paper needs an explicit artifact test (e.g., off-burst, quiet-Sun, or artificial-signal check) before the 'reported for the first time ever' claim can be supported.
  2. [Sec. 3.2 and Sec. 2 (DART description)] The independent DART dataset cannot corroborate the beads: DART samples only 16 discrete frequencies between 150 and 450 MHz with channel spacings of roughly 15-48 MHz, far coarser than the claimed 0.8 MHz bead spacing. The paper should state this limitation explicitly and, if any higher-time-resolution or multi-frequency verification exists, present it; otherwise the beaded-stripe class is supported by a single instrument for the defining sub-structure.
  3. [Sec. 4 (second prediction of the DPR scenario)] The use of the DPR mechanism as a quantitative diagnostic is circular as presented. The frequency separation between successive stripes is assumed to equal Omega_ce in order to infer B0 = 0.4-1.8 G, and the same separation is then described as a model prediction. To make the scenario testable, the paper must either predict the stripe spacing from an independently measured magnetic field (e.g., NLFFF extrapolation or source-position constraints) or explicitly reframe the exercise as parameter estimation rather than prediction.
  4. [Sec. 3.2, Sec. 3.3, Table 1] The quantitative characterization of the stripes and beads is given as ranges without error bars, fitting criteria, or significance tests. For example, the drift rates in Fig. 4(a) are quoted as varying from -12 to -5 MHz/s, and the bead parameters in Fig. 6 are said to be 'read from the zoom-in view,' but no fitting method or measurement uncertainty is reported. This makes it difficult to verify the claimed periodicity, parallelism, and event-to-event similarity, and it weakens the central observational conclusion.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Title and figures] The title contains a typographical error ('Pe riodic'), and several figure axis labels appear garbled in the manuscript (e.g., 'F 3eq6en(y' in Fig. 1). The final version should use clean, machine-readable axis labels.
  2. [Sec. 4] The sentence 'In the following study, we will develop a quantitative model...' correctly identifies that growth rates are not computed here, but this limitation should also appear in the abstract or concluding summary so that the proposed mechanism is not read as a demonstrated quantitative explanation.
  3. [Table 1] Event B is listed with a stripe period of 0.1-0.2 s, which overlaps the bead period of the May 8 event; the paper should clarify whether these are distinct phenomena or whether the classification criterion (chained vs. beaded) is based on morphology alone.
  4. [Data Availability Statement] The CBSm data link is given as 'Gallery of CSO type-II Bursts' without a URL; the published version should provide a direct, working link so that the claimed new structure can be independently inspected.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

The paper's DPR-based 'prediction' that stripe spacing equals Ωce restates its identification of stripes with successive UH harmonics; the inferred B field is just the observed spacing converted into gauss. The beaded-stripe discovery itself is an independent observational claim and the interpretive part is only partially circular.

  1. self definitional [Section 4 (Summary and Discussion), paragraphs after Fig. 8: 'Once ωpe/Ωce varies by a unity...' and 'With this scenario we predict...']
    "we have excitations of successive UH harmonics of (s ± 1) Ωce. The harmonics correspond to the radio stripes in a chain... With this scenario we predict that ... the frequency separation of successive stripes is determined by Ωce, this allows us to diagnose B0. For the four events reported here, we have Ωce varying from 1–5 MHz, then the magnetic field strength within the radio source varies from 0.4–1.8 G."

    The model first identifies each observed stripe with a successive upper-hybrid harmonic, so the spacing between stripes is, by construction, one electron-cyclotron frequency Ωce. The 'prediction' that the frequency separation is determined by Ωce therefore restates the identification rather than making a new, falsifiable claim. The paper then reads Ωce from the observed spacing (1–5 MHz) and converts it to B = 0.4–1.8 G, so the derived magnetic field is the input spacing expressed in different units. There is no independent observable that could disagree with the model: any stripe spacing would yield some Ωce and hence some B. The identification also leaves the harmonic number s unconstrained, so the spacing cannot independently test the DPR mechanism.

full rationale

Most of the paper is a direct observational report: the beaded stripes are identified on CBSm spectra, their time and frequency scales are measured, and DART provides brightness-temperature and source-location context. The discovery claim itself is not circular — it does not presuppose the DPR model. The chained-stripe phenomena are also compared with previously reported fibers/sawtooth structures rather than renamed as a new mechanism. Self-citations (CBSm instrument paper [15], DPR papers [27,28]) are present, but the DPR condition is independently supported by the external refs [25,26], so they are not load-bearing in a circular sense. The genuine circular step is the DPR-interpretation 'prediction': stripes are assumed to be successive UH harmonics separated by Ωce, and the observed spacing is then 'predicted' to equal Ωce and converted into B. This makes the inferred B value a restatement of the observed spacing, not an independent test. Because that step concerns the proposed mechanism rather than the novel observation itself, the paper is partially but not wholly circular.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the observational identification of the stripes and on an interpretive model that is not quantitatively tested in the paper. No free parameters are fitted in a quantitative sense, but the harmonic number and the mapping from stripe spacing to Ωce are unverified modeling choices.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption DPR instability drives upper-hybrid waves for loss-cone electron distributions
    Invoked in Section 4 as the emission mechanism; supported by cited literature [25-28] but not re-derived here.
  • ad hoc to paper Successive stripes in a chain are successive UH harmonics, switched as ωpe/Ωce varies by unity
    Core new interpretative step in Section 4; no quantitative dispersion calculation is given in this paper.
  • ad hoc to paper The frequency separation of stripes equals Ωce
    Used to diagnose B = 0.4 to 1.8 G; this assumption is the basis of the 'prediction' and is not independently verified.
  • ad hoc to paper Bead periodicity (0.1 s) maps to a 10 Hz MHD wave modulating UH growth
    Section 4; authors state they cannot determine the exact wave mode with present data.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A Novel Fine Spectral Structure of Solar Radio Bursts with Periodic Beaded Stripes Observed by CBSm of CMP-II." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/EBVRVMW4

@misc{pith2026250606819,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A Novel Fine Spectral Structure of Solar Radio Bursts with Periodic Beaded Stripes Observed by CBSm of CMP-II},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/EBVRVMW4}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.06819}
}
abstract

A novel fine spectral structure in solar radio bursts has been discovered using the Chashan broadband solar radio spectrometer at meter wavelengths (CBSm), an instrument of the Chinese Meridian Project-Phase II (CMP-II). The structure features periodic narrow-band stripes with a typical recurrence time $< 1 $ s (occasionally reaches 8 s), often drifting from high to low frequencies and accompanied by absorptions, with trailing stripes appearing at the end of preceding ones. Some stripes exhibit periodic beaded enhancements with a periodicity of $\sim$0.1 s. The beaded stripes are reported for the first time ever. Data from the DAocheng Radio Telescope (DART) indicate a radio emission brightness temperature exceeding $10^{9}$ K, originating above brightening loops in active region AR 13664. We proposed a novel generation mechanism of the periodic stripes on the basis of the double plasma resonance (DPR) instability, and explained the beaded substructure in terms of modulation by low-frequency magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) waves. The study highlights the CBSm's capability to detect high-resolution fine spectral structures and offers novel insights into the emission mechanism and source characteristics of solar radio bursts.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

32 extracted references · 11 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Boischot, J

    A. Boischot, J. F. Denisse, Les \'e missions de Type IV et l'origine des rayons cosmiques associ \'e s aux \'e ruptions chromosph \'e rigues. (Stanford University Press, Stanford, 1959), p. 186, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1959IAUS....9..186B

    work page 1959

  2. [2]

    Kr \"u ger,\ Introduction to solar radio astronomy and radio physics (Springer Dordrecht, 1984), pp

    A. Kr \"u ger,\ Introduction to solar radio astronomy and radio physics (Springer Dordrecht, 1984), pp. 113-126. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9402-7, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1984itsr.book.....K

    work page doi:10.1007/978-94-009-9402-7 1984

  3. [3]

    Slottje, Atlas of Fine Structures of Dynamic Spectra of Solar Type IV-dm and Some Type II Radio Bursts, Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree, (Utrecht University, 1982), pp

    C. Slottje, Atlas of Fine Structures of Dynamic Spectra of Solar Type IV-dm and Some Type II Radio Bursts, Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree, (Utrecht University, 1982), pp. 32-95. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1982PhDT.......179S

    work page 1982

  4. [4]

    Aurass, J

    H. Aurass, J. Kurths, G. Mann, G. P. Chernov, and M. Karlicky,\ Solar Physics \ 108, 131-137 (1987). doi:10.1007/BF00152082, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1987SoPh..108..131A

    doi:10.1007/bf00152082 1987

  5. [5]

    G. Mann, K. Baumgaertel, G. P. Chernov, and M. Karlicky,\ Solar Physics \ 120, 383-391 (1989). doi:10.1007/BF00159886, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1989SoPh..120..383M

    doi:10.1007/bf00159886 1989

  6. [6]

    G. P. Chernov,\ Space Science Reviews \ 127, 195-326 (2006). doi:10.1007/s11214-006-9141-7, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006SSRv..127..195C

    doi:10.1007/s11214-006-9141-7 2006

  7. [7]

    G. P. Chernov,\ Astronomy Letters \ 34, 486-499 (2008). doi:10.1134/S1063773708070074, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008AstL...34..486C

    doi:10.1134/s1063773708070074 2008

  8. [8]

    S. W. Feng, Y. Chen, C. Y. Li, B. Wang, Z. Wu, X. L. Kong, Q. F. Du, J. R. Zhang, and G. Q. Zhao,\ Solar Physics \ 293, 39 (2018). doi:10.1007/s11207-018-1263-z, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018SoPh..293...39F

    doi:10.1007/s11207-018-1263-z 2018

Show all 32 references
  1. [9]

    Klassen, H

    A. Klassen, H. Aurass, and G. Mann,\ Astronomy and Astrophysics \ 370, L41-L44 (2001). doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20010332, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001A&A...370L..41K

    2001 doi

  2. [10]

    Karlick \'y , M

    M. Karlick \'y , M. B \'a rta, A. Klassen, H. Aurass, and G. Mann,\ Solar Variability: From Core to Outer Frontiers \ 1, 303-306 (2002). https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002ESASP.506..303K

    2002

  3. [11]

    G. P. Chernov,\ Astronomy Letters \ 23, 827-837 (1997). https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1997AstL...23..827C

    1997

  4. [12]

    J. Yan, J. Wu, L. Wu, Y. Yang, J. Wu, Y. Yan, and C. Wang,\ Nature Astronomy \ 7, 750-750 (2023). doi:10.1038/s41550-023-01932-y, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023NatAs...7..750Y

    2023 doi

  5. [13]

    Y. Yan, Z. Chen, W. Wang, F. Liu, L. Geng, L. Chen, C. Tan, X. Chen, C. Su, and B. Tan,\ Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences \ 8, 20 (2021). doi:10.3389/fspas.2021.584043, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021FrASS...8...20Y

    2021

  6. [14]

    Y. Yan, J. Zhang, W. Wang, F. Liu, Z. Chen, and G. Ji,\ Earth Moon and Planets \ 104, 97-100 (2009). doi:10.1007/s11038-008-9254-y, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009EM

    2009 doi

  7. [15]

    Chang, B

    S. Chang, B. Wang, G. Lu, Y. Shen, Y. Bai, Z. Shang, L. Zhang, Z. Wu, Y. Su, Y. Chen, and F. Yan,\ The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series \ 272, 21 (2024). doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ad3de7, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJS..272...21C

    2024 doi

  8. [16]

    Wang W, Yan Y H, Tan B L, Tan C M, Feng S W, Liu F, Chen L J, Su C. 2024. Wide-band solar radio spectral monitoring in the Phase II of Chinese Meridian Project. Reviews of Geophysics and Planetary Physics, 55(1): 1-5 (in Chinese). DOI: 10.19975/j.dqyxx.2023-016

    2024 doi

  9. [17]

    Z. Hou, H. Tian, W. Su, M. S. Madjarska, H. Chen, R. Zheng, X. Bai, and Y. Deng,\ The Astrophysical Journal \ 953, 171 (2023). doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ace31b, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...953..171H

    2023 doi

  10. [18]

    Y. Yang, Z. Ning, Y. Song, Y. Han, X. Tang, M. Gao, H. Liu, J. Yan, B. Wang, and S. Chang, \ The Astrophysical Journal \ 985, 257 (2025). doi:10.3847/1538-4357/add143

    2025 doi

  11. [19]

    Yingli Cui, Xiangliang Kong, Zhentong Li, et al., Generation of a metric type II radio burst by jet-induced perturbation propagating through coronal loops, \ Astronomy and Astrophysics, 2025, under review

    2025

  12. [20]

    D. Li, D. Yuan, J. Yan, X. Zhao, Z. Wu, J. Wang, Z. Hou, C. Li, H. Zhao, L. Fu, L. Wu, and L. Deng,\ Journal of Geophysical Research (Space Physics) \ 130, e2025JA033772 (2025). doi:10.1029/2025JA033772, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025JGRA..13033772L

    2025 doi

  13. [21]

    Yan, F.-B., Y. Liu, K. Xu, Z.-Q. Shang, Y.-R. Su, G. Lu, Y. Chen, and Z. Wu,\ Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics \ 20, 156 (2020). doi:10.1088/1674-4527/20/9/156, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020RAA....20..156Y

    2020 doi

  14. [22]

    Z. Hou, H. Tian, J. Yan, M. S. Madjarska, J. Zhang, Y. Xu, H. Chen, Z. Wu, L. Wu, X. Lv, Y. Yang, Y. Liu, L. Deng, L. Feng, and Y. Qiu,\ Astronomy and Astrophysics \ 695, A12 (2025). doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202453282, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025A

    2025 doi

  15. [23]

    B. T. Wang, X. Cheng, J. Y. Yan, C. Xing, W. T. Fu, L. Wu, L. Deng, A. L. Lan, Y. Chen, C. Wang, and M. D. Ding,\ The Astrophysical Journal \ 984, 97 (2025). doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adcb46, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025ApJ...984...97W

    2025 doi

  16. [24]

    Schou, and 20 colleagues,\ Solar Physics \ 275, 229-259 (2012)

    J. Schou, and 20 colleagues,\ Solar Physics \ 275, 229-259 (2012). doi:10.1007/s11207-011-9842-2, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012SoPh..275..229S

    2012 doi

  17. [25]

    J. R. Lemen, and 46 colleagues,\ Solar Physics \ 275, 17-40 (2012). doi:10.1007/s11207-011-9776-8, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012SoPh..275...17L

    2012 doi

  18. [26]

    W. D. Pesnell, B. J. Thompson, and P. C. Chamberlin,\ Solar Physics \ 275, 3-15 (2012). doi:10.1007/s11207-011-9841-3, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012SoPh..275....3P

    2012 doi

  19. [27]

    R. M. Winglee, and G. A. Dulk,\ The Astrophysical Journal \ 307, 808 (1986). doi:10.1086/164467, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1986ApJ...307..808W

    1986 doi

  20. [28]

    E. Y. Zlotnik,\ Solar Physics \ 284, 579-588 (2013). doi:10.1007/s11207-012-0151-1, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013SoPh..284..579Z

    2013 doi

  21. [29]

    C. Li, Y. Chen, X. Kong, M. Hosseinpour, and B. Wang,\ The Astrophysical Journal \ 880, 31 (2019). doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab270f, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...880...31L

    2019 doi

  22. [30]

    C. Li, Y. Chen, S. Ni, B. Tan, H. Ning, and Z. Zhang,\ The Astrophysical Journal \ 909, L5 (2021). doi:10.3847/2041-8213/abe708, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...909L...5L

    2021 doi

  23. [31]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archive author booktitle chapter collaboration edition editor eid eprint howpublished institution journal key month note number numpages organization pages publisher school series title type url volume year label INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence afte...

  24. [32]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 gl...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.