Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

Almost rigidity of the Talenti-type comparison theorem on $\mathrm{RCD}(0,N)$ space

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Near equality in Talenti's comparison forces an RCD(0,N) space to be almost a Euclidean cone.

desk verdict New almost-rigidity and Lp compactness for p-Laplacian on RCD(0,N), with a real gap for 1<N<2 and some presentation issues, but the core strategy is sound and worth refereeing. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.07100 v1 pith:WXRKOXFB submitted 2025-06-08 math.AP

Wenjing Wu This is my paper
classification math.AP MSC 53C2335J92
keywords TalenticomparisonRCD(0N)spacesp-LaplacianalmostrigidityEuclideanmetricmeasureconecompactnessSchwarzsymmetrizationisoperimetricinequality
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proves that Talenti's classical comparison, in which the Schwarz symmetrization of a solution is controlled by the solution of the symmetrized problem, holds for the p-Laplacian with Dirichlet data on open subsets of RCD(0,N) spaces, the synthetic class of spaces with nonnegative Ricci curvature and dimension at most N, provided the space has Euclidean volume growth. The quantitative version is the main discovery: if the comparison is almost an equality in the Lp norm, then the whole space is close, in the pointed measured Gromov–Hausdorff sense, to a Euclidean metric measure cone. This converts a functional inequality into a geometric rigidity statement: near-sharp rearrangement bounds are only possible near conical geometry.

What carries the argument

Two mechanisms carry the argument. First, the comparison chain of Theorem 4.3: the isoperimetric inequality Per(E) ≥ N $ω_N^{{1/N}}$ $AVR_m^{{1/N}}$ m(E)^{(N−1)/N}, combined with the coarea formula and Lemma 4.2, yields the pointwise bound $AVR_m^{{q/N}}$ u⋆ ≤ v on [0,r_a], with the explicit model-space solution formula (3.5) as the comparison target. Second, the almost rigidity uses the compactness theorem (Theorem 6.14), which gives Lp-strong precompactness of $W^{{1,p}}$_0 sequences of functions on balls in varying RCD(0,N) spaces converging in the pmGH sense, together with the Γ-convergence of p-Cheeger energies (Proposition 6.16); passing to the limit turns the small Lp deficit into exact equality, and the quoted rigidity of the isoperimetric inequality (Theorem 5.1, from [21] and [22]) turns that equality into conicity of the limit space.

What would settle it

Take a sequence of spaces obtained by smoothing the tip of a Euclidean metric cone over a small radius r_n→0, solve the p-Poisson problem with a fixed radial datum, and compute both ‖$AVR^{{q/N}}$ u⋆_n − v_n‖_{Lp} and the pmGH-distance to every Euclidean metric measure cone; if the deficit tends to 0 while the distance to every cone stays bounded below by a positive constant, then Theorem 6.18 would be false.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central result is Theorem 6.18. For every ε>0, p>1, N>1, and any bounds on the volume a=m(Ω), the volume-growth constant AVR_m, the distance from the marked point, and the norms of the datum f, there is δ>0 such that: if Ω=B_R(x) is a ball in an RCD(0,N) space with AVR_m≥b, f∈$W^{{1,q}}$_0 with c_l≤‖f‖_{Lq}≤‖f‖_{$W^{{1,q}}$}≤c_u, u solves −L_p u = f, v solves −L_p v = f⋆ on the model interval, and ‖$AVR_m^{{q/N}}$ u⋆ − v‖_{Lp} < δ, then there is a Euclidean metric measure cone (Z,d_Z,m_Z,\bar z) with d_pmGH((X,d,m,\bar x),(Z,d_Z,m_Z,\bar z)) < ε. The proof runs by contradiction: a sequence with deficits 1/n is pmGH-compact, the limit solves the same Poisson problem, the limit achieves exact equality in the Talenti chain, and the isoperimetric rigidity theorem forces the limit space to be a Euclidean cone.

Load-bearing premise

The proof depends on Theorem 5.1, taken from earlier work: equality in the isoperimetric inequality (2.7) for some set forces the space to be a Euclidean metric measure cone with the set as a centered ball; if that rigidity statement fails, or fails to apply to the superlevel sets that arise in the limit, the almost-rigidity conclusion has no proof.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For p=2 and Euclidean volume growth, the result yields a quantitative stability statement for the classical Talenti comparison on RCD(0,N) spaces, extending the known rigidity to a neighbourhood of equality.
  • The L^r gradient estimate (4.1), valid for every 1 ≤ r ≤ p, is a direct consequence of the comparison chain and holds on every RCD(0,N) space with Euclidean volume growth.
  • If equality holds at a single point (Theorem 5.4), the comparison is exactly saturated on the whole tail and the space is a Euclidean metric measure cone; with extra regularity the solution is radial about a tip.
  • The δ in Theorem 6.18 depends on ε, p, N, the volume bounds a_1,a_2, the volume-growth lower bound b, the ratio c_l/c_u, and the distance bound d, so the almost rigidity is quantitative with respect to all data of the problem.
  • When the space is already a Euclidean cone, the comparison is sharp: the paper shows the inequality becomes equality on the half-line model.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural next step the paper does not take is to make δ explicit: the contradiction proof gives existence of δ but no rate, and an explicit deficit-to-distance estimate, even in model cases, would turn the almost rigidity into a quantitative stability inequality.
  • Because the limit argument uses only the isoperimetric inequality and the Γ-convergence of Cheeger energies, the same scheme may prove almost rigidity for other rearrangement-type inequalities on RCD spaces, such as Sobolev or spectral-gap comparisons, whenever their equality cases are conical.
  • For 1<N<2 the quoted rigidity theorem may need separate verification, since the cross-sectional dimension N−1 of the cone is below the usual dimension threshold; a counterexample there would limit the theorem's range even if the comparison itself holds.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. This paper studies the Dirichlet p-Poisson problem on open subsets of RCD(0,N) spaces with N in (1,∞). It proves a Talenti-type comparison theorem: the Schwarz symmetrization of the solution, normalized by the asymptotic volume ratio, is pointwise bounded above by the solution of the symmetrized one-dimensional model problem; it also proves L^r gradient estimates, a rigidity theorem saying that equality forces the space to be a Euclidean metric measure cone, and an almost-rigidity theorem (Theorem 6.18) saying that L^p closeness of the symmetrized solution to the model solution forces the underlying space to be pmGH-close to a Euclidean cone. The proof of the almost-rigidity result proceeds by contradiction, passing to a pmGH limit and using rigidity of the isoperimetric inequality on the limit space. A compactness theorem for W^{1,p} functions with respect to varying measures is developed and used as a key tool.

Significance. If correct, Theorem 6.18 is a genuine quantitative rigidity result for Talenti comparison in the nonsmooth RCD setting, and the overall strategy is coherent. The paper contains substantial self-contained material: a detailed proof of the coarea formula, an explicit analysis of the one-dimensional model problem, and a compactness theorem for W^{1,p} under pmGH convergence. It does not introduce free parameters or normalization tricks; the asymptotic volume ratio is a geometric invariant. The main caveats are technical rather than conceptual: the stated range 1<N<2 is not covered by the cone definition and rigidity theorem as written, and Theorem 1.2 is stated without the hypotheses under which it is proved. These issues are local and appear fixable without changing the main strategy.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 5, Definition 5.1 and Theorems 5.1, 5.4, 6.18] The statements of Theorem 5.1, Theorem 5.4, and Theorem 6.18 cover every N>1, but Definition 5.1 defines a Euclidean metric measure cone as a cone over an RCD(N−2,N−1) space. For 1<N<2 the cross-section dimension N−1 is below 1, where the standard RCD condition is not defined. Since Step 4 of the proof of Theorem 6.18 uses Theorem 5.1 to infer that the limit space is a Euclidean cone, the main almost-rigidity theorem is unproved on the stated range. Please either restrict the cone definition and all rigidity/almost-rigidity statements to N≥2, or supply a degenerate convention for cross-sections of dimension N−1<1 and verify that the quoted rigidity theorem covers that convention.
  2. [Section 5, Theorem 5.1] The text states that the boundedness assumption on E in [21] can be dropped thanks to [22], but no specific result of [22] is identified. This strengthening is not needed for the application: every superlevel set appearing in Step 4 of Theorem 6.18 is contained in the ball B_{R∞}(x∞), hence is bounded. Please either quote the precise theorem from [22] that justifies the unbounded version, or remove the strengthening and apply the original bounded statement from [21].
  3. [Theorem 1.2 and Assumption 6.12] The compactness theorem is stated in the introduction without the technical hypotheses under which it is proved in Section 6.2: the uniform local doubling function D, the Poincaré constant function P, the measure-growth function C, the sphere-boundary condition m∞(∂B_r(z))=0, the proper ambient space Y, and the other conditions of Assumption 6.12. As stated, Theorem 1.2 also uses dpmGH convergence but does not specify that the functions f_n are identified in a common space or that the L^p convergence is understood in the varying-measure sense of Definition 6.1. Since Theorem 6.18 invokes this compactness result, please restate Theorem 1.2 under Assumption 6.12 or prove that the omitted conditions are automatically satisfied in the setting of Theorem 6.18.
  4. [Section 6.4, Theorem 6.19] Theorem 6.19 is stated as a theorem of the paper but its proof is omitted with the comment that it is 'very similar' to a result in [19]. This is missing support for a stated result. If Theorem 6.19 is not needed for the main almost-rigidity theorem, it should be removed or clearly labeled as a remark; if it is kept as a theorem, a proof or a precise reference for the full statement should be supplied.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section 2.3, Lemma 2.4 and Theorem 2.5] In the statement of Lemma 2.4, the notation |Df|_{w,p} is used before it is introduced; please define it or point to the earlier definition. In the proof of Theorem 2.5, the limit 'B → 0 as m → 0' in the estimate of the term B should read 'as m → ∞'.
  2. [Section 3, Proposition 3.3] In Step 4 of the proof, the term B is estimated with 'm → 0' but the preceding definition uses m→∞; this is a typo that should be corrected.
  3. [Section 5, Theorem 5.4] In the proof of part (i), the claim that u^♯ is continuous on the whole closed interval [0,m(Ω)] requires justification when u is unbounded, since u^♯(0) may be infinite. The argument only needs continuity away from possible atoms, so please clarify the treatment of the endpoint.
  4. [Section 6.1, Lemma 6.13] The proof fixes τ>0 and then writes 'let s_k = 2^{-k}r for every r∈(0,τ]', which is formally confusing because r should be fixed for the argument. Please rephrase to make the choice of r and the subsequent limiting procedure clear.
  5. [Section 6.3, Theorem 6.18 proof, Step 1] After passing to a pmGH limit, the proof uses the lower semicontinuity of the distance to the class of Euclidean metric measure cones to assert that the limit still satisfies (6.19). This should be stated explicitly, with a justification or a reference, since the class of cones is not compact a priori.
  6. [Throughout] There are numerous typographical issues with arrows and subscripts, such as 'n− →' instead of '→' and 'µ♯' instead of 'µ' in a few places. These do not affect the mathematics but should be corrected in a final revision.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the almost-rigidity theorem reduces to external isoperimetric rigidity from [21]–[22] and to the author’s prior published comparison lemmas [19]; the only flagged issues are non-circular applicability gaps for 1<N<2 and the asserted unbounded-E strengthening of Theorem 5.1.

full rationale

The derivation chain is not circular. Theorem 4.3 derives the Talenti comparison from the isoperimetric inequality (2.7), the coarea formula, and the rearrangement Lemmas 4.1–4.2; the constant A_VR_m is a geometric invariant (a limit volume ratio), not a fitted parameter, and the p-Laplacian solutions are genuine PDE solutions. The rigidity Theorem 5.4 reduces equality in the Talenti inequality to equality in the isoperimetric inequality via equations (5.2) and (4.2), then invokes Theorem 5.1, quoted from Cavalletti–Manini [21] and [22]; that is an external rigidity statement, not a renamed version of the equality being proved. The almost-rigidity proof of Theorem 6.18 obtains a pmGH limit and shows that the limit has equality in the isoperimetric chain for its superlevel sets; conicity follows from the same external Theorem 5.1, not from the near-equality assumption by construction. The near-equality assumption only produces equality in the limit through Lp-strong convergence; it does not define the cone. Self-citations are minor and not load-bearing: Lemmas 4.1–4.2, Proposition 6.17(ii)–(vi), and the proof of Theorem 6.19 are referred to the author’s prior published paper [19], which contains a full Talenti-type comparison theorem for the p-Laplacian on RCD(K,N) spaces; using that published result as a lemma for a new compactness/almost-rigidity statement is normal mathematical practice, not a circular reduction. The paper does not import a uniqueness theorem from its own authors; the rigidity theorem is due to [21] and [22]. Two non-circular limitations are flagged: (i) Section 5 asserts without identifying a specific result that the boundedness assumption in [21] can be dropped, writing: 'Theorem 5.1 is stated in [21] with the extra assumption that E is bounded, however this assumption can be dropped thanks to the recent [22].' This is an unsupported strengthening, though it is not needed for the superlevel sets in Theorem 6.18 since they lie inside a fixed ball. (ii) Definition 5.1 and Theorems 5.1, 5.4 and 6.18 are stated for all N>1, but the cone cross-section is required to be RCD(N−2,N−1), whose dimension N−1 is below 1 for 1<N<2, outside the standard range of RCD spaces; no degenerate convention is given. These are applicability/correctness risks, not instances of circular reasoning. Overall score 2: one minor self-citation that is not load-bearing.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the sharp isoperimetric inequality, its rigidity, Pólya-Szegő rigidity, Gamma-convergence of Cheeger energies, and compactness of pmGH classes. No free parameters are fitted to data, and no new particles, forces, dimensions, or other entities are introduced.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption RCD(0,N) synthetic curvature-dimension condition with positive Euclidean volume growth AV_R > 0
    Defines the class of spaces throughout; volume growth enters the isoperimetric constant and the radius bounds in Step 1 of Theorem 6.18.
  • domain assumption Sharp isoperimetric inequality for CD(0,N) spaces, Theorem 2.6, quoted from [16] and [17]
    Used in the first inequality of the comparison chain (4.2); the constant AV_R^{1/N} determines the final comparison and rigidity statements.
  • domain assumption Isoperimetric rigidity: equality in (2.7) implies a Euclidean metric cone, Theorem 5.1, quoted from [21] and [22]
    Used in Theorem 5.4 and in Step 4 of the almost rigidity proof to identify the limit space as a cone.
  • domain assumption Pólya-Szegő inequality and its rigidity for RCD(0,N) spaces, Propositions 5.2 and 5.3, quoted from [23] and [24]
    Used in Theorem 5.4(iii) to prove radiality of u and in the rigidity arguments.
  • domain assumption Gamma-convergence of p-Cheeger energies under pmGH convergence, Proposition 6.16, quoted from [31]
    Used in Proposition 6.17(i) to obtain lower semicontinuity of the p-energy for limit functions.
  • standard math Compactness of the normalized pmGH class and uniform doubling and Poincaré estimates for RCD spaces, Proposition 6.9 and Remark 6.8
    Provides the compactness and uniform analytic estimates needed in Theorem 6.14 and in the contradiction argument of Theorem 6.18.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Almost rigidity of the Talenti-type comparison theorem on $\mathrm{RCD}(0,N)$ space." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WXRKOXFB

@misc{pith2026250607100,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Almost rigidity of the Talenti-type comparison theorem on $\mathrmRCD(0,N)$ space},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WXRKOXFB}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.07100}
}
abstract

In this paper, we prove a Talenti-type comparison theorem for the $p$-Laplacian with Dirichlet boundary conditions on open subsets of a $\mathrm{RCD}(0,N)$ space with $N\in (1,\infty)$. We also obtain an almost rigidity result of the Talenti-type comparison theorem, whose proof relies on a compactness on varying spaces.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Mean curvature and sharp Willmore inequalities in metric spaces

    math.DG 2026-07 accept novelty 7.5 of 10

    Level sets of electrostatic potentials on RCD(0,N) spaces carry an L2 mean curvature vector satisfying the classical sharp Willmore inequality with rigidity and almost-rigidity.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

31 extracted references · 31 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [19]

    Wenjing Wu, A Talenti-type comparison theorem for the p-Laplacian on RCD(K,N) spaces and some applications, Nonlinear Analysis, Volume 248, 2024, 113631, ISSN 0362-546X

    work page 2024

  2. [22]

    Antonelli, E

    G. Antonelli, E. Pasqualetto, M. Pozzetta, I.Y. Violo, Topological regularity of isoperimetric sets in PI spaces having a deformation property, Proc. R. Soc. Edinb. Sect. A Math. (2023)

    work page 2023

  3. [21]

    Fabio Cavalletti, Davide Manini, Rigidities of isoperimetric inequality under nonnegative Ricci curvature. J. Eur. Math. Soc. (2024)

    work page 2024

  4. [1]

    Talenti, G.: Elliptic equations and rearrangements. Ann. Scuola Norm. Sup. Pisa Cl. Sci. 4(3), 256 (1976)

    work page 1976

  5. [2]

    Daguang Chen, Haizhong Li, Talenti’s comparison theorem for Poisson equation and applica- tions on Riemannian manifold with nonnegative Ricci curvature, J. Geom. Anal. 33 (4) (2023) 20, Paper No. 123

    work page 2023

  6. [3]

    Gigli, A

    N. Gigli, A. Mondino, G. Savar´ e, Convergence of pointed non-compact metric measure spaces and stability of Ricci curvature bounds and heat flows, Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (3) 111 (5) (2015) 1071-1129

    work page 2015

  7. [4]

    Bj¨ orn and A

    J. Bj¨ orn and A. Ka lamajska, Poincar´ e inequalities and compact embeddings from Sobolev type spaces into weighted Lq spaces on metric spaces, J. Funct. Anal. 282 (2022), no. 11, Paper No. 109421, 47 pp

    work page 2022

  8. [5]

    Ambrosio, L., Gigli, N., Savar´ e, G.: Density of Lipschitz functions and equivalence of weak gradients in metric measure spaces. Rev. Mat. Iberoam. 29(3), 969-996 (2013)

    work page 2013

Show all 31 references
  1. [6]

    Ambrosio, L., Gigli, N., Savar´ e, G.: Calculus and heat flow in metric measure spaces and applications to spaces with Ricci bounds from below. Invent. Math. 195(2), 289-391 (2014) ALMOST RIGIDITY OF THE TALENTI-TYPE COMPARISON THEOREM 39

    2014

  2. [7]

    Cheeger, J.: Differentiability of Lipschitz functions on metric measure spaces. Geom. Funct. Anal. 9(3), 428-517 (1999)

    1999

  3. [8]

    Shanmugalingam, N.: Newtonian spaces: an extension of Sobolev spaces to metric measure spaces. Rev. Mat. Iberoamericana 16(2), 243-279 (2000)

    2000

  4. [9]

    Gigli, N.: On the differential structure of metric measure spaces and applications. Mem. Am. Math. Soc. 236(1113), vi+91 (2015)

    2015

  5. [10]

    Gigli, Nonsmooth differential geometry–an approach tailored for spaces with Ricci curvature bounded from below, Mem

    N. Gigli, Nonsmooth differential geometry–an approach tailored for spaces with Ricci curvature bounded from below, Mem. Am. Math. Soc. 251 (2018), v+161

    2018

  6. [11]

    Gigli, F

    N. Gigli, F. Nobili, A first-order condition for the independence on p of weak gradients, J. Funct. Anal. 283 (2022) Paper (109686) 52

    2022

  7. [12]

    Miranda, M., Jr.: Functions of bounded variation on ”good” metric spaces. J. Math. Pures Appl. 82(8), 975-1004 (2003)

    2003

  8. [13]

    Ambrosio, L., Di Marino, S.: Equivalent definitions of BV space and of total variation on metric measure spaces. J. Funct. Anal. 266(7), 4150-4188 (2014)

    2014

  9. [14]

    PhD Thesis, Scuola Normale Superiore, Pisa (2014)

    Di Marino, S.: Recent advances on BV and Sobolev spaces in metric measure spaces. PhD Thesis, Scuola Normale Superiore, Pisa (2014)

    2014

  10. [15]

    Gigli, N., Han, B.: Independence on p of weak upper gradients on RCD spaces. J. Funct. Anal. 271(1), 1-11 (2014)

    2014

  11. [16]

    Balogh and Alexandru Kristaly

    Zoltan M. Balogh and Alexandru Kristaly. Sharp isoperimetric and Sobolev inequalities in spaces with nonnegative Ricci curvature. Math. Ann., 385(3-4):1747-1773, 2023

    2023

  12. [17]

    Perimeter as relaxed Minkowski content in metric measure spaces

    Luigi Ambrosio, Simone Di Marino, and Nicola Gigli. Perimeter as relaxed Minkowski content in metric measure spaces. Nonlinear Anal., 153:78-88, 2017

    2017

  13. [18]

    Mondino, M

    A. Mondino, M. Vedovato, A Talenti-type comparison theorem for RCD(K, N) spaces and applications, Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations 60 (4) (2021) 157

    2021

  14. [20]

    Folland, Real Analysis: Modern Techniques and their Applications, vol

    G. Folland, Real Analysis: Modern Techniques and their Applications, vol. 40, John Wiley Sons, 1999

    1999

  15. [23]

    Francesco Nobili, Ivan Yuri Violo, Rigidity and almost rigidity of Sobolev inequalities on compact spaces with lower Ricci curvature bounds, Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations 61 (5) (2022) 65, Paper No. 180

    2022

  16. [24]

    Francesco Nobili, Ivan Yuri Violo, Stability of Sobolev inequalities on Riemannian manifolds with Ricci curvature lower bounds, Advances in Mathematics, Volume 440, 2024, 109521, ISSN 0001-8708,

    2024

  17. [25]

    Honda, Ricci curvature and Lp-convergence, J

    S. Honda, Ricci curvature and Lp-convergence, J. Reine Angew. Math. 705 (2015) 85-154

    2015

  18. [26]

    Luigi Ambrosio, Nicola Gigli, Giuseppe Savar´ e, Giuseppe: Gradient Flows in Metric Spaces and in the Space of Probability Measures, second ed., in: Lectures Math., ETH Z¨ urich Birkh¨ auser Verlag, Basel, 2008, p. x+334

    2008

  19. [27]

    Tapio Rajala, Interpolated measures with bounded density in metric spaces satisfying the curvature-dimension conditions of Sturm, J. Funct. Anal. 263 (4) (2012) 896-924

    2012

  20. [28]

    Sturm, On the geometry of metric measure spaces

    K.T. Sturm, On the geometry of metric measure spaces. II, Acta Math. 196 (1) (2006) 133-177

    2006

  21. [29]

    Haj lasz, P

    P. Haj lasz, P. Koskela, Sobolev met poincar´ e, Mem. Am. Math. Soc. 145 (688) (2000) x-101

    2000

  22. [30]

    Korevaar–Schoen’s energy on strongly rectifiable spaces

    Gigli, N., Tyulenev, A. Korevaar–Schoen’s energy on strongly rectifiable spaces. Calc. Var. 60, 235 (2021)

    2021

  23. [31]

    Luigi Ambrosio, Shouhei Honda, New stability results for sequences of metric measure spaces with uniform Ricci bounds from below, in: Measure Theory in Non-Smooth Spaces, in: Partial Differ. Equ. Meas. Theory De Gruyter Open, Warsaw, 2017, pp. 1-51. 40 WENJING WU School of Mat...

    2017

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.