Heegaard Floer theory and pseudo-Anosov flows II: Differential and Fried pants

Antonio Alfieri; Chi Cheuk Tsang

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 17 references

Heegaard Floer theory and pseudo-Anosov flows II: Differential and Fried pants

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Every sleek multi-orbit of a pseudo-Anosov flow contributes exactly one dimension to sutured Floer homology, and for suspension flows the next-to-top grading counts least-period periodic points.

desk verdict Solid sequel: new rs-grading and dimension count for sleek summands, but hinges on imported Proposition 3.3 from the companion paper. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.07163 v1 pith:JDRV72T2 submitted 2025-06-08 math.GT math.DS

Antonio Alfieri , Chi Cheuk Tsang This is my paper · ORCID

classification math.GTmath.DS MSC 57K1837D20

keywords HeegaardFloerhomologysuturedpseudo-Anosovflowsveeringbranchedsurfacesrefinedspin-cgradingFriedpantsperiodicpointcountssleekmulti-orbits

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper studies the sutured Heegaard Floer chain complex built from a pseudo-Anosov flow and a chosen collection of closed orbits with respect to which the flow has no perfect fits. The authors introduce a refinement of the $\mathrm{spin}^c$-grading, called the rs-grading, which uses a multi-valued lift of the standard $\varepsilon$-map to obstruct effective domains: if an effective domain connects two generators, then their sets of possible strums overlap. They prove that for every sleek multi-orbit, one whose representing loops never become tangled under sweeping, the summand of the complex attached to that multi-orbit has homology of dimension one. If correct, this gives a dynamical reading of Floer homology: in the suspension case, the next-to-top nonzero sutured Floer group counts periodic points of least period, matching and generalizing results for fibered knots.

What carries the argument

The central object is the rs-grading, defined from a multi-valued lift $\mathrm{r}\varepsilon$ of the $\varepsilon$-map: a generator $x$ maps to the homology classes of all possible strums of its multi-loop $\mu_x$ in the augmented dual graph, and two generators are rs-equivalent when these sets overlap, with the relation transitively closed. This grading works because, in the canonical veering Heegaard diagram, every effective domain is embedded with alternating $\alpha/\beta$ boundary, so the $\beta$-boundary decomposes into paths whose homology classes force a common strum. The second carrying device is the dynamic annulus or Möbius band $D(\gamma)$ associated to a sleek orbit $\gamma$, together with its maximal core $C$; on $C$ one defines the combinatorial complex $CC(C)$ generated by loops representing the orbit and equipped with a differential counting single strums across red sectors forward and blue sectors backward. The proof of Theorem 1.7 identifies the Floer subcomplex with $CC(C)$, then runs an induction over cores, reducing to a single loop with trivial homology.

What would settle it

Compute, for a small canonical diagram such as the figure-eight knot complement whose 10 Heegaard states are explicitly listed, all effective domains between generators: a single effective domain connecting two generators whose sets of strum homology classes are disjoint would refute Lemma 1.3, and a sleek summand whose homology has dimension different from 1 would refute Theorem 1.7.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central claim is Theorem 1.7: for any sleek multi-orbit $\gamma$ of the blown-up flow $\phi^\#$, the corresponding summand $\mathrm{SF}\,C(\phi,\mathcal{C},\gamma)$ has homology $H_*(\mathrm{SF}\,C(\phi,\mathcal{C},\gamma)) \cong \mathbb{F}$. The rs-grading is a genuine refinement of the $\mathrm{spin}^c$-grading, and each rs-class for a sleek orbit is generated exactly by the Heegaard states whose multi-loop represents that orbit. The proof identifies this summand with a combinatorial chain complex $CC(C)$ on a maximal core of the dynamic annulus or Möbius band of $\gamma$, whose differential counts single strums across red and blue sectors; an induction on cores shows every such complex has one-dimensional homology. Theorem 1.8 transfers this to suspension flows: for the blown-up monodromy $f^\#$ with least period $P$, one has $\dim \mathrm{SF}\,H(Y^\#, n) = \frac{1}{n} \cdot \#\{\text{period-}n\text{ periodic points of } f^\#\}$ whenever $n$ lies between $P$ and $2P-1$, and symmetrically near the top grading, which makes the next-to-top grading count periodic points of least period.

Load-bearing premise

The argument rests on Proposition 3.3 imported from the companion paper: in this specially constructed Heegaard diagram every effective domain has all multiplicities 0 or 1, its boundary alternates between $\alpha$- and $\beta$-arcs, and no $\alpha$- or $\beta$-arc contains a point of the top generator; if a domain with higher multiplicity or non-alternating boundary existed, the common-strum obstruction and the description of the differential would both need to be modified.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

The sutured Heegaard Floer chain complex decomposes into rs-graded summands, and no differential term can join generators with different rs-gradings, so the $\mathrm{spin}^c$-graded blocks split further in a way read off from the veering branched surface.
Every pants-irreducible multi-orbit is sleek, so each such orbit contributes at least one dimension to $\mathrm{SF}\,H(Y^\#)$; in particular, $\dim \mathrm{SF}\,H(Y^\#) \geq \#\{\text{pants-irreducible multi-orbits of } \phi^\#\}$.
For a suspension pseudo-Anosov flow, $\dim \mathrm{SF}\,H(Y^\#, n) = \frac{1}{n}\cdot\#\{\text{period-}n\text{ periodic points of } f^\#\}$ for $n = P, \ldots, 2P-1$ and for the symmetric top interval $n = \frac{3e}{2}-(2P-1), \ldots, \frac{3e}{2}-P$; the next-to-top nonzero grading counts least-period periodic points, and the second-to-top grading counts fixed points.
For fibered hyperbolic knots satisfying the stated monodromy and degeneracy-slope hypotheses, the knot Floer homology dimension in grading $g-1$ equals the number of interior fixed points of the monodromy plus $4g-1$, recovering known knot Floer counts.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the common-strum obstruction behind Lemma 1.3 is as strong as claimed, then the same criterion should govern effective domains in any Heegaard diagram arising from a veering branched surface; testing it on veering triangulations beyond the examples treated here would be a cheap, direct check of the method.
The one-dimensional sleek summands suggest a direct categorification of the zeta function: 'long' or tangled multi-orbits would cancel in pairs under strumming, so the homology keeps one generator per sleek orbit; a formal spectral-sequence proof of that cancellation would connect the present complex to a Novikov-ring complex counting all multi-orbits.
For Anosov flows that are not suspensions, the same sleek-summand counting should give lower bounds on sutured Floer homology in terms of pants-irreducible orbits, potentially certifying nonzero Floer classes from flow data alone.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The paper delivers what it promises: a refinement of the spin-c grading (the rs-grading) on the canonical Heegaard diagram of a veering branched surface, a clean statement that every sleek summand has one-dimensional homology, and a new counting result for suspension flows. Theorems 1.7 and 1.8 are real advances, not repackaged versions of Ni or Ghiggini-Spano. The identification of the sleek summand with the combinatorial complex of the maximal core is genuinely new, and the induction over cores is a nice argument. The proof of Proposition 6.5, matching the Floer differential with strumming, is detailed and plausible.

The main soft spot is the one the authors themselves flag by importing Proposition 3.3 from the companion paper [AT25]. That proposition — embeddedness, alternating boundary, no x_top in arc interiors — is the load-bearing wall. Lemma 3.4 and Proposition 6.5 both lean on it, and if it fails, the rs-grading could lose its obstruction property and the differential could pick up extra terms. This is a legitimate conditionality, not a manufactured one. The paper is honest that the proof lives elsewhere, but a referee cannot fully verify Theorems 1.7 and 1.8 without checking [AT25] carefully. I would not call this circular — the isomorphism is obtained by matching differentials, not by postulating the answer — but it is external dependence.

Minor issues: the abstract credits Agol-Guéritaud, but that work is missing from the references. Theorem 2.18 (empty polygons have one holomorphic disk) is used as folklore; that is standard but worth a citation to something more accessible than private communication. Also, the rs-grading equivalence relation is defined via the transitive closure of an intransitive relation; the paper handles this correctly, but it is a place where a reader can easily get confused.

Overall, the mathematical core looks sound to me. The paper is written for specialists in Heegaard Floer homology and pseudo-Anosov flows, and it will be of real value to that audience. It deserves a serious referee. My recommendation: send it to peer review, with the explicit instruction that the referee check the imported Proposition 3.3 and its use in Sections 3 and 6. Fix the missing reference, and it is a strong contribution.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies the differential of the sutured Heegaard Floer chain complex associated to a veering branched surface of a pseudo-Anosov flow. It introduces a multi-valued lift rε of the Ozsváth-Szabó ε-map, defines a refined rs-grading, and proves that an effective domain connecting two states forces their rε-sets to intersect (Lemma 3.4). It then associates to each sleek multi-orbit a combinatorial chain complex CC(C) whose differential is given by strumming, proves that H(CC(C)) ≅ F, and identifies the sleek summand SF C(φ,C,rs) with CC(C) (Proposition 6.5), yielding Theorem 1.7. Applications to suspension flows and fibered knots are then derived, including counting statements in the spirit of Ni and Ghiggini-Spano.

Significance. The main theorems, if correct, would be a substantial bridge between sutured Floer homology and the periodic orbit structure of pseudo-Anosov flows, giving an explicit combinatorial model for certain summands of the Floer chain complex. The inductive proof that H(CC(C)) ≅ F is explicit and largely checkable from the text, and the identification of the differential with strumming in Proposition 6.5 is a valuable structural statement. However, the advertised counting applications currently contain a mismatch between the stated formula and its use, and the main results depend heavily on a structural proposition imported from the companion paper [AT25].

major comments (2)

[Section 1.4, Theorem 1.8; Section 7.2, proof of Corollary 1.9] The statement of Theorem 1.8 is internally inconsistent. The displayed formula asserts that for n in the top range, dim SF H(Y#, n) = (1/n)·(# periodic points of f# of period n). In the setting of Corollary 1.9, f# is obtained by blowing up a pseudo-Anosov map at a fixed singular point, so the least period is P = 1, e = 4g−2, and the top range reduces to the single value n = 3e/2 − 1 = 6g−4. The formula therefore says that dim SF H(Y7, 6g−4) equals (1/(6g−4)) times the number of period-(6g−4) points, not the number of fixed points. Nevertheless, the proof of Corollary 1.9 invokes Theorem 1.8 to conclude dim SF H(Y7, 6g−4) = # fixed points of f#. These two statements cannot both be correct. The final sentence of Theorem 1.8, saying that the next-to-top nonzero grading counts periodic points of the least period, appears to conflate the grading n with the period P, and the same conflation is carried into the proof of Corollary 1.9. The theorem and corollary need to be corrected so that the counting claim follows from the stated formula.
[Sections 3.4 and 6.2 (Lemma 3.4 and Proposition 6.5)] Lemma 3.4 and Proposition 6.5 are load-bearing for Theorems 1.7 and 1.8, and both rely on Proposition 3.3, which is imported from [AT25, Propositions 5.9, 5.13, 5.15] and not proved here. Clause (1) of Proposition 3.3 is used in Lemma 3.4 to decompose ∂βD into simple arcs; clause (3) is used to write each such arc as a difference of directed paths from xbot; and clause (2) controls the boundary pattern in the proof of Proposition 6.5. If any effective domain with multiplicities, non-alternating boundary, or an α/β-arc through x_top existed, the rs-grading would not be a genuine obstruction and the strumming differential could miss terms. Because the companion proof is not included, the central results are conditional on an external structural input. I recommend stating this dependence explicitly in the statements of Theorems 1.7 and 1.8 and, if [AT25] is not yet available in published form, providing a proof or a detailed sketch of the three clauses of Proposition 3.3.

minor comments (4)

[Section 7.2, proof of Corollary 1.9] The phrase '4 longitudinal sutures' appears to be a typo for '2 longitudinal sutures'; with four sutures per solid torus the suture counts in the decomposition do not add up to 8g−4, while with two sutures they do, matching the two generators z_top and z_bot used later.
[Section 6.2, proof of Proposition 6.5] The proof cites 'Theorem 2.15' for the Lipshitz index computation; the correct references are Definition 2.15 and Theorem 2.16.
[Section 7.1, Corollary 7.2] The statement 'dim SF H(Q) ≥ 2N+1' should presumably be 'dim SF H(Q) ≥ 2^{N+1}', since 2^N multi-loops are formed from the N eastward branch loops.
[Section 4.2, Definition 4.9] There is a typo in the resolution relation: 'γ˝∪{G}' should be 'γ˝∪{γ+}' (or the analogous object).

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the refined grading and chain-complex identification are proved from structural lemmas rather than assumed.

full rationale

The paper's central claim (Theorem 1.7) is not equivalent to any input by construction. The rs-grading is defined through a multi-valued homology lift of the Ozsváth–Szabó ε-map, independently of the differential, and Lemma 3.4 proves that any effective domain forces a common strum. The combinatorial complex CC(C) has its own differential given by strumming across red/blue sectors, and Proposition 6.5 identifies it with the Floer differential by a direct computation of effective domains and their Lipshitz indices, not by declaring the two complexes equal. The induction over cores, reducing to the trivial one-orbit base case, is substantive. The suspension-flow application counts rs-gradings against periodic orbits using the established bijection F, rather than renaming a known count. The only external dependence is on Proposition 3.3, imported from the authors' companion paper [AT25]; this is a normal sequel dependency on a stated structural lemma about effective domains, and it does not smuggle in the theorem being proved. No fitted parameters or tautological redefinitions appear.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no fitted free parameters; the only numerical inputs are dynamical quantities such as the least period P and the prong count e, which are defined from the map rather than fitted. The central claim rests on background results imported from the companion paper [AT25] and from [LMT23], plus a folklore empty-polygon count. No new physical entities are posited; the rs-grading, sleek multi-orbits, maximal cores, and the combinatorial complex CC(C) are mathematical constructs whose properties are proved internally.

assumptions (5)

domain assumption Theorem 2.7: for a pseudo-Anosov flow with no perfect fits relative to C (containing singular orbits), there is a veering branched surface B and a bijection F from sweep-equivalence classes of loops in G+ to closed orbits of φ#.
Imported from [AT25, Theorem 2.5], [LMT23], [Tsa23]. The definitions of γ_x, sleek multi-orbits, and dynamic annuli all depend on this bijection.
domain assumption Proposition 3.3: every effective domain in the canonical veering Heegaard diagram is embedded, has alternating α/β boundary, and has boundary arcs avoiding x_top.
From [AT25, Proposition 5.9, Lemma 5.13, Proposition 5.15]. Used in Lemma 3.4 to prove the rε obstruction and in Proposition 6.5 to identify the Floer differential with strumming.
domain assumption Theorem 2.18: an empty 2n-gon has exactly one holomorphic representative, so its contribution to the differential coefficient is 1.
Cited as folklore from [OSS12]. Used in Proposition 6.5 to convert domain counts into differential coefficients.
standard math Standard sutured Heegaard Floer theory: the chain complex is well-defined, invariant, and splits along spinc-structures after admissible diagrams.
Background from [Juh06], [OS04], [Lip06]. The admissibility of the specific diagram is from [AT25, Proposition 5.14].
domain assumption The no-perfect-fits hypothesis and nonempty C containing singular orbits are satisfied whenever the framework is applied, including suspension flows with C containing singular orbits.
Stated in Theorem 2.7 and Section 1.4. The main theorems only apply under this dynamical hypothesis.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Heegaard Floer theory and pseudo-Anosov flows II: Differential and Fried pants." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/JDRV72T2

@misc{pith2026250607163,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Heegaard Floer theory and pseudo-Anosov flows II: Differential and Fried pants},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/JDRV72T2}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.07163}
}

abstract

In earlier work, relying on work of Agol-Gu\'eritaud and Landry-Minsky-Taylor, we showed that given a pseudo-Anosov flow $(Y,\phi)$ and a collection of closed orbits $\mathcal{C}$ satisfying the `no perfect fit' condition, one can construct a special Heegaard diagram for the link complement $Y^\sharp= Y \setminus \nu (\mathcal{C})$ framed by the degeneracy curves. In this paper, we demonstrate how the special combinatorics of this diagram can be used to understand the differential of the associated Heegaard Floer chain complex. More specifically, we introduce a refinement of the $\text{spin}^\text{c}$-grading obstructing two Heegaard states from being connected by an effective domain. We describe explicitly the subcomplexes in the refined gradings that represent irreducible multi-orbits, in the sense that they contain states corresponding to multi-orbits which cannot be resolved along Fried pants. In particular we show that the homology of these subcomplexes are 1-dimensional. When specialized to the case of suspension flows our arguments prove some results in the spirit of Ni, Ghiggini, and Spano: the next-to-top non-zero sutured Floer group counts the number of periodic points of least period.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.07163 by the authors.

**Figure 1.** The figure-eight knot complement Y 7 admits a veering branched surface B. Top left: Dual graph of B. Bottom left: Heegaard diagram of Y 7 associated to B. Right: SF HpY 7 q computed using this Heegaard diagram, along with the s- and rs-gradings. of chain-complexes. To illustrate the rs-grading we use the example of the figure-eight knot complement. Example 1.4 (Figure-eight knot). Let ϕ be the suspension flow on th… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** A simple example illustrating the induction on cores in the proof of Theorem 6.1. In this example there are two cores: the one shaded in yellow contains the other shaded in blue (with the area of overlap appearing green). The portions of the chain complex corresponding to the yellow and blue cores are indicated by the yellow and blue boxes respectively. We then run an induction argument by showing that if C 1 is a s… view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** A local picture around a triple point in a branched surface satisfying Theorem 2.1(3). which we call the maw coorientation, given by the direction from the side with more sectors to the side with less sectors, as indicated in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (19 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Each sector of a veering branched surface is a diamond. strum strum [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png]

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Each edge of G`zG can be strum into a path of G in two ways. Definition 2.4 (Sweep-equivalent). We say that two loops in G` are sweep-equivalent if they are related by a finite sequence of strums. More precisely, if we have a sequence of loops c0, . . . , cn in G` wher…

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: The color of a triple point is determined by the local form of the branched surface. Here the orientation on M is used to distinguish between the two local pictures [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png]

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: An example of the local configuration of sectors in a veering branched surface. 2.3. Pseudo-Anosov flows. For the purposes of this paper, a pseudo-Anosov flow on a closed 3-manifold Y is a continuous flow ϕ for which there is a pair of singular 2-dimensional foliations…

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: Local picture of a pseudo-Anosov flow. Left: Near a singular orbit. Right: Away from a singular orbit [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_8.png]

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: Blowing up along [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_9.png]

**Figure 10.** Figure 10: The α-curves are placed in correspondence with the triple points of B. M M0 M1 0 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_10.png]

**Figure 11.** Figure 11: The 3-manifold obtained from pΣ0, α, βq is the submanifold M0 Ă M with complement MzM0 a collection of solid tori tT1, . . . , Tℓu, one for each cusp curve on BM. In M0, we have a collection of annuli Ai , each with one boundary component along the core of Ti and the …

**Figure 12.** Figure 12: The local combinatorics of the Heegaard diagram near a triple point v depends on the color of v. with the branch loops of B. Furthermore, each annulus Ai can be decomposed into a union of punctured rectangles, one for each α-curve it contains in its closure. Each of t…

**Figure 13.** Figure 13: Picking the edges ex,i, the union of which is the multi-loop µx associated to x. ways of assigning to each sector one of its four corners, so that each triple point is picked exactly once. The Floer chain complex of a veering branched surface B has two preferential ge…

**Figure 14.** Figure 14: Checking that every β-arc eri of D, which goes from yi to xi , can be written as a difference eri “ erx,i ´ ery,i. Modulo the symmetry of reflecting the sector across the vertical diagonal, and interchanging xi and yi , there are 8 cases. In 3 of the cases, xi “ yi in…

**Figure 15.** Figure 15: A Fried pants Definition 4.9 (Pants-equivalence). Let P be a Fried pants. Let γ˘ be the closed multi-orbit that is the collection of positive/negative boundary components of P. For every closed multi-orbit γ ˝ , we say that the closed multi-orbits γ ˝ Y tGu and γ ˝ Y …

**Figure 16.** Figure 16: Left: Each vertex vr0 of Gr gives a maximal rectangle Rvr0 . Right: If vr1 and vr2 are the two vertices that follow vr0 in Gr, then Rvr1 and Rvr2 are taller and thinner than Rvr0 . Now suppose c and c 1 are two loops in G passing through the same vertex v. Lift c and …

**Figure 17.** Figure 17: Constructing a Fried pants in the proof of Theorem 4.10. Now pick an arc αr on Rrvr connecting γr X Rrvr to γr 2 X Rrvr that is transverse to ΛĂs and ΛĂu. Similarly, pick an arc αr 1 on Rrvr connecting γr 1 X Rrvr to γr 2 X Rrvr that is transverse to ΛĂs and ΛĂu. Cons…

**Figure 18.** Figure 18: An example of a dynamic plane. (2) an open M¨obius band if c is not a multiple of a branch loop and is orientationreversing, or (3) a half-open annulus if c is a multiple of a branch loop. We call Dpcq the dynamic annulus or M¨obius band associated to c accordingly. …

**Figure 19.** Figure 19: The setup in Theorem 5.7. Dpc 1 q “ Dpγq, we see that c and c 1 are related by sweeping across finitely many sectors in Dpγq as well. We can enlarge C by adding these sectors one-by-one. At each stage, one sector is removed from A, and the boundary component of A is a…

**Figure 20.** Figure 20: Defining a compact region C so that every core is contained in C. Repeating the argument, we get an infinite chain of rectangles R0 Ą R1 Ą . . . , which implies that R0 contains infinitely many sectors. Contradiction. □ Using Theorem 5.7, we can show that there is an …

**Figure 21.** Figure 21: If there is an effective domain D connecting c1 P S to c2 P S with Lipshitz index 1, then c1 and c2 differ by a turn t and D “ Dptq. Now suppose there is an effective domain D connecting c1 P S to c2 P S. We consider the sets T L 1 :“ tt P T | t is a side vertex of a …

**Figure 22.** Figure 22: When a veering branched surface T B is orientable, we can label its branch loops as westward or eastward. In this figure, the orientation on T B is induced from the standard one on the page. 7. Applications 7.1. Orientable veering branched surfaces. We say that a veer…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

17 extracted references · 12 canonical work pages

[1]

Heegaard F loer theory and pseudo- A nosov flows I : Generators and categorification of the zeta function, 2025

Antonio Alfieri and Chi Cheuk Tsang. Heegaard F loer theory and pseudo- A nosov flows I : Generators and categorification of the zeta function, 2025

work page 2025
[2]

Quasigeodesic flows in hyperbolic 3-manifolds

S\' e rgio Fenley and Lee Mosher. Quasigeodesic flows in hyperbolic 3-manifolds. Topology , 40(3):503--537, 2001

work page 2001
[3]

Transitive A nosov flows and pseudo- A nosov maps

David Fried. Transitive A nosov flows and pseudo- A nosov maps. Topology , 22(3):299--303, 1983

1983
[4]

Knot F loer homology of fibred knots and F loer homology of surface diffeomorphisms, 2022

Paolo Ghiggini and Gilberto Spano. Knot F loer homology of fibred knots and F loer homology of surface diffeomorphisms, 2022

work page 2022
[5]

Holomorphic discs and sutured manifolds

Andr\' a s Juh\' a sz. Holomorphic discs and sutured manifolds. Algebr. Geom. Topol. , 6:1429--1457, 2006

2006
[6]

Floer homology and surface decompositions

Andr\' a s Juh\' a sz. Floer homology and surface decompositions. Geom. Topol. , 12(1):299--350, 2008

work page 2008
[7]

The sutured F loer homology polytope

Andr\' a s Juh\' a sz. The sutured F loer homology polytope. Geom. Topol. , 14(3):1303--1354, 2010

2010
[8]

A cylindrical reformulation of H eegaard F loer homology

Robert Lipshitz. A cylindrical reformulation of H eegaard F loer homology. Geom. Topol. , 10:955--1096, 2006. [Paging previously given as 955--1097]

2006

Show all 17 references

[9]

Landry, Yair N

Michael P. Landry, Yair N. Minsky, and Samuel J. Taylor. Flows, growth rates, and the veering polynomial. Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems , 43(9):3026--3107, 2023

2023
[10]

Knot F loer homology and fixed points, 2022

Yi Ni. Knot F loer homology and fixed points, 2022

2022
[11]

Holomorphic disks and topological invariants for closed three-manifolds

Peter Ozsv\' a th and Zolt\' a n Szab\' o . Holomorphic disks and topological invariants for closed three-manifolds. Ann. of Math. (2) , 159(3):1027--1158, 2004

2004
[12]

Ozsváth, András I

Peter S. Ozsváth, András I. Stipsicz, and Zoltán Szabó. Heegaard F loer homology. In preparation
[13]

Stipsicz, and Zolt\' a n Szab\' o

Peter Ozsv\' a th, Andr\' a s I. Stipsicz, and Zolt\' a n Szab\' o . Combinatorial H eegaard F loer homology and nice H eegaard diagrams. Adv. Math. , 231(1):102--171, 2012

2012
[14]

From veering triangulations to link spaces and back again, 2019

Saul Schleimer and Henry Segerman. From veering triangulations to link spaces and back again, 2019

2019
[15]

An algorithm for computing some H eegaard F loer homologies

Sucharit Sarkar and Jiajun Wang. An algorithm for computing some H eegaard F loer homologies. Ann. of Math. (2) , 171(2):1213--1236, 2010

2010
[16]

Veering Triangulations and Pseudo- A nosov Flows

Chi Cheuk Tsang. Veering Triangulations and Pseudo- A nosov Flows . PhD thesis, 2023

2023
[17]

Anosov flows and the pair of pants differential

Jonathan Zung. Anosov flows and the pair of pants differential. In preparation

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Heegaard F loer theory and pseudo- A nosov flows I : Generators and categorification of the zeta function, 2025

Antonio Alfieri and Chi Cheuk Tsang. Heegaard F loer theory and pseudo- A nosov flows I : Generators and categorification of the zeta function, 2025

work page 2025

[2] [2]

Quasigeodesic flows in hyperbolic 3-manifolds

S\' e rgio Fenley and Lee Mosher. Quasigeodesic flows in hyperbolic 3-manifolds. Topology , 40(3):503--537, 2001

work page 2001

[3] [3]

Transitive A nosov flows and pseudo- A nosov maps

David Fried. Transitive A nosov flows and pseudo- A nosov maps. Topology , 22(3):299--303, 1983

1983

[4] [4]

Knot F loer homology of fibred knots and F loer homology of surface diffeomorphisms, 2022

Paolo Ghiggini and Gilberto Spano. Knot F loer homology of fibred knots and F loer homology of surface diffeomorphisms, 2022

work page 2022

[5] [5]

Holomorphic discs and sutured manifolds

Andr\' a s Juh\' a sz. Holomorphic discs and sutured manifolds. Algebr. Geom. Topol. , 6:1429--1457, 2006

2006

[6] [6]

Floer homology and surface decompositions

Andr\' a s Juh\' a sz. Floer homology and surface decompositions. Geom. Topol. , 12(1):299--350, 2008

work page 2008

[7] [7]

The sutured F loer homology polytope

Andr\' a s Juh\' a sz. The sutured F loer homology polytope. Geom. Topol. , 14(3):1303--1354, 2010

2010

[8] [8]

A cylindrical reformulation of H eegaard F loer homology

Robert Lipshitz. A cylindrical reformulation of H eegaard F loer homology. Geom. Topol. , 10:955--1096, 2006. [Paging previously given as 955--1097]

2006