Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 41 references

Capability demonstration of a JEDI-based system for TEMPO assimilation: system description and evaluation

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper demonstrates the first JEDI-based TEMPO NO2 assimilation with 4DEnVar and an EDA, improving column analyses and capturing diurnal variability while lowering surface NO2.

desk verdict First JEDI 4DEnVar+EDA cycling of hourly TEMPO NO2 is a credible integration milestone, but the column-improvement claim is overstated and the systematic negative surface increments may be a TEMPO-bias artifact. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.07321 v1 pith:YJ46RSEL submitted 2025-06-08 physics.ao-ph stat.AP

Maryam Abdi-Oskouei , Jérôme Barré This is my paper
classification physics.ao-phstat.AP
keywords dataassimilation4DEnVarensembleofassimilationsTEMPOnitrogendioxidegeostationarysatelliteGEOS-CFtroposphericNO2column
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper is a capability demonstration: it tries to establish that data assimilation methods built for numerical weather prediction, specifically four-dimensional ensemble variational assimilation (4DEnVar) and an Ensemble of Data Assimilations (EDA), can be transferred to atmospheric composition inside the JEDI (Joint Effort for Data assimilation Integration) framework. The test is to assimilate hourly tropospheric NO2 columns from TEMPO, the geostationary pollution monitor over North America, together with once-daily TROPOMI columns from a polar-orbiting instrument, into the GEOS-CF chemical forecast model over the continental United States for August 2023. A sympathetic reader would care because TEMPO is the first geostationary instrument giving hourly pollution views over North America, and this is the first reported system that folds that high-frequency information into a global chemical forecast. The results show the analysis fits the assimilated columns, captures the diurnal NO2 cycle, and improves agreement with Pandora and aircraft in situ measurements, while systematically lowering surface NO2 and thereby worsening agreement with AirNow surface stations. The paper reads that mixed result as evidence that observation biases and the separation of column and surface information are now the central issues, and as motivation for bias correction and dual concentration-emission assimilation.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the fusion of 4DEnVar with EDA inside JEDI. 4DEnVar defines the assimilation cost function in the ensemble subspace, so background error covariances are flow-dependent and observations are matched against time-interpolated ensemble trajectories; this is what lets hourly TEMPO data act on all hours of a six-hour window without a tangent-linear or adjoint model. EDA runs an independent 4DEnVar analysis for each ensemble member with perturbed observations, perturbed meteorology from a replayed forecast ensemble, and sector-dependent multiplicative emissions perturbations, which keeps ensemble spread alive and provides a posterior uncertainty estimate. Around that core sit the UFO column retrieval operator, which maps model mixing ratios to tropospheric or total columns using the retrieval's averaging kernels and a priori profile; the SABER/BUMP covariance machinery with NICAS localization, configured with a horizontal localization radius growing from 100 km near the surface to 5000 km aloft and a vertical localization of 0.3 in eta coordinates; and the GEOS-CF replay configuration, which fixes meteorology while letting transport uncertainty enter through the ensemble. Ozone is deliberately not among the variables being optimized (the control vector), so all ozone changes in the analysis are produced by model chemistry responding to the NO2 increments.

What would settle it

Compare TEMPO tropospheric NO2 columns with collocated Pandora total-column NO2 and GCAS partial columns at the same places and times, stratified by hour, cloud fraction, and region over August 2023. If TEMPO shows a systematic morning high bias of the same sign and magnitude as the negative analysis increments, the surface NO2 degradation is a retrieval-bias artifact; if no such bias appears, the degradation points to a real model or vertical-representativeness error, and bias correction would still be needed but for a different reason.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that a JEDI-based 4DEnVar system with a 32-member EDA can assimilate hourly TEMPO geostationary NO2 retrievals into GEOS-CF alongside daily TROPOMI retrievals, producing credible chemical analyses and demonstrating that weather-forecasting-grade assimilation technology transfers to air quality. In the August 2023 CONUS experiment, the analysis moves the modeled columns closer to the assimilated observations, spreads observational influence through the six-hour assimilation windows via ensemble trajectories, and brings the modeled morning NO2 peak closer to TEMPO. The dominant physical signature is a systematic negative increment in the lower troposphere: column assimilation removes NO2 near the surface, improving agreement with Pandora total columns and AEROMMA in situ NO2 and ozone, but degrading surface NO2 relative to AirNow. The paper flags that TEMPO may carry a high bias and that no variational bias correction is applied, so the surface degradation could be a bias artifact; it also notes the ozone improvement is chemically expected but achieved 'for the wrong reasons,' since ozone is not assimilated and the improvement follows from NO2 reductions in regimes where volatile organic compounds limit ozone production.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the filtered TEMPO tropospheric NO2 columns are unbiased enough, and the uncertainty values attached to them are accurate enough, that pulling the model toward them improves the true atmospheric state; if TEMPO is biased high, the systematic negative surface increments and the degraded AirNow comparison are artifacts of that bias, not real corrections.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Hourly geostationary NO2 columns can be assimilated into a global chemical forecast at scale: the JEDI system improves the match to TEMPO and captures the morning NO2 peak across CONUS and all study regions.
  • The generic column retrieval operator handles TEMPO, TROPOMI, GCAS, and Pandora in one framework, so assimilation and independent evaluation share the same observation operator infrastructure instead of separate post-processing tools.
  • Column-only NO2 assimilation lowers surface NO2; if TEMPO is biased high, this is a bias artifact that calls for bias correction, and if the model is genuinely biased, it is a real correction that needs a surface constraint, and in either case the next step is jointly optimizing concentrations and emissions instead of columns alone.
  • Ozone improves indirectly because lowering NO2 suppresses photochemical ozone in summer conditions where volatile organic compounds limit ozone production; this corrects the model's known positive ozone bias without adding ozone observations, which exposes VOC emission and photochemistry uncertainties.
  • The forecast model dominates computational cost, so real-time operational use of TEMPO assimilation depends on reducing that cost; the paper identifies neural network model emulation as the active development path.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct test of the TEMPO-bias hypothesis would be to rerun the August 2023 experiment with a Pandora-anchored bias correction for TEMPO columns: if the AirNow surface degradation vanishes, the negative surface increments are retrieval artifacts rather than model corrections.
  • The same JEDI 4DEnVar-EDA setup is a natural platform for observing system simulation experiments that quantify how much hourly geostationary sampling adds over daily polar sampling for NOx emission inversions, a comparison the paper motivates but does not run.
  • Because ozone enters only through chemistry, the reported ozone improvement is compensation rather than an independent constraint; assimilating ozone or VOC-sensitive observations alongside NO2 would separate genuine ozone increments from NO2-driven compensation.
  • The replay configuration fixes meteorology, so the composition analysis cannot feed back into weather; a coupled meteorology-composition application would require extending the system beyond the demonstrated setup.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports the first implementation of TEMPO tropospheric NO2 column assimilation in the JEDI framework, using 4DEnVar with an Ensemble of Data Assimilations (EDA) coupled to the GEOS-CF model. Hourly TEMPO and daily TROPOMI NO2 retrievals are cycled over CONUS for August 2023, and the analysis is evaluated against Pandora, AirNow, AEROMMA, and STAQS/GCAS observations. The authors demonstrate that the system can ingest high-frequency geostationary retrievals, reduce observation-minus-background residuals, and reproduce diurnal NO2 variability. They also report systematic negative near-surface NO2 increments that improve agreement with Pandora and AEROMMA but degrade comparisons with AirNow and GCAS, and they discuss mechanisms including possible TEMPO bias and the absence of bias correction. The central claim is feasibility of applying 4DEnVar+EDA to atmospheric composition, with a secondary claim that assimilation improves model performance in the column.

Significance. If the feasibility claim holds, this is a notable advance: it is, to my knowledge, the first demonstration of 4DEnVar combined with EDA for tropospheric composition assimilation, and it shows that a model-agnostic framework like JEDI can assimilate hourly geostationary observations with flow-dependent, ensemble-derived background errors. The manuscript is unusually candid in reporting degraded comparisons against independent datasets (GCAS and AirNow), which is a scientific strength. The system description is detailed enough to be reproduced in principle, and the independent evaluation across ground, aircraft, and satellite platforms is a model for subsequent GEO-AQ assimilation studies. However, the paper's accuracy claims about column improvements are not uniformly supported by the independent evaluation, and the absence of observational bias correction leaves a key mechanism for the systematic surface degradation unaddressed. With appropriate qualification or additional testing, this would be a valuable contribution to the field.

major comments (4)
  1. [Abstract and §4] The abstract claims that assimilation 'improves model performance in the column,' but this is not uniformly supported by the independent evaluation. Section 3.3.2 reports that the GCAS comparison is generally degraded (§14), and Section 3.3.3 reports degraded surface NO2 against AirNow. The column improvements are evident for Pandora rural/suburban sites and in the fit to the assimilated TEMPO/TROPOMI columns, but the GCAS partial-column degradation indicates that the improvement claim is dataset-dependent. I recommend either qualifying the claim to specific datasets or providing a synthesized evaluation that weighs the contradictory evidence.
  2. [§2.5 and §4] The observation perturbations in the EDA assume that reported retrieval errors are accurate, independent, and Gaussian. Geostationary retrievals typically have spatially and temporally correlated errors from common air-mass-factor, cloud, and albedo assumptions; using them at face value with a diagonal error model can overfit the correlated component. The paper itself notes in §4 that TEMPO may carry a high bias and that no VarBC is applied. If TEMPO columns are biased high, the systematic negative near-surface increments shown in Figures 9 and 10 could be artifacts of pulling the model toward a biased observational target, which would independently explain the degraded AirNow and GCAS comparisons. A sensitivity test with bias-corrected TEMPO columns or with inflated/correlated observation errors would directly test this, and should be reported before drawing conclusions about the accuracy of surface-level changes.
  3. [§3.1] The fit-to-observation metric (|OMB| - |OMA|, Figure 5) is an internal diagnostic: it verifies that the minimization reduced the cost function, not that the analysis is closer to the true atmospheric state. The text in §3.1 repeatedly interprets this metric as 'improvement' relative to observations. I recommend explicitly labeling these as consistency diagnostics and reserving accuracy statements for the independent evaluations in Section 3.3.
  4. [§3.4] The improved agreement with AirNow and AEROMMA ozone after assimilation is described in §3.4 as an improvement achieved 'for the wrong reasons,' because it results from lowering surface NO2 rather than from a physically better NO2 state. This is an honest and important caveat, but it undercuts the idea that the ozone improvement is an independent confirmation of assimilation skill. I recommend presenting the ozone result as a hypothesis-generating finding about model VOC/NOx biases, not as a validated benefit of the assimilation system, unless further evidence is provided.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Throughout] There are several typographical inconsistencies: 'TropOMI' should be 'TROPOMI' in Section 2.1.2, the title has a spacing issue in 'JEDI- BASED', and the CEOS reference contains 'Compositin' and 'Aeroas'. These should be corrected in a final polish.
  2. [§3.3.1] Figure 13 is described with colored lines ('blue line' and 'red line' in the text), but the caption does not identify which line corresponds to 32mem and which to noDA. Please add a legend or explicit caption labels.
  3. [§3.3.2] Figure 14 boxplots are not fully defined in the caption; for consistency with Figure 15, state what the box edges, whiskers, and median represent.
  4. [§2.3.3] The sentence '4DEnVar does not assimilate observations at their exact time' is ambiguous because the method does use observation times through time-interpolated ensemble trajectories. I recommend rewording to clarify that it does not perform a model integration to the exact observation time, but it does account for observation time.
  5. [§2.4 and §3.3.1] The manuscript reports model resolution inconsistently: GEOS-CF is described as ~25 km global in §2.4, while §3.3.1 refers to '1° and 0.25°' for the analysis and forecasting system. Please clarify which resolution is used for the assimilation control vector and which for the evaluation.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

Only minor circularity: OMB-OMA fit diagnostics are definitional; the central capability claim rests on independent evaluations.

  1. self definitional [Section 3.1, 'Observation-space analysis statistics', fit-to-observation metric definition]
    "A fit-to-observation performance metric is defined as the difference of the absolute errors between observation-minus-background (OMB) and observation-minus-analysis (OMA). Positive values of this metric indicate that the assimilation has improved agreement with the observations (i.e., OMA is smaller than OMB), bringing the analysis closer to the assimilated data."

    OMA is the output of the 4DEnVar minimization whose cost function contains exactly the squared observation-minus-analysis misfit for the assimilated TEMPO/TROPOMI columns. Therefore OMA being smaller than OMB in this metric is a property of the minimization, not an independent empirical result. The paper uses this only as a diagnostic sanity check and explicitly labels it as such, while the abstract's column-improvement claim is additionally supported by independent Pandora and aircraft comparisons. The step is definitional but not load-bearing for the central feasibility claim.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is a technical feasibility demonstration: first implementation of a JEDI-based 4DEnVar plus EDA system assimilating hourly TEMPO NO2 retrievals alongside TROPOMI into GEOS-CF. The evaluation suite includes independent datasets (AirNow surface, Pandora columns, AEROMMA in situ, STAQS/GCAS aircraft), none of which are inputs to the assimilation, so the main result is not defined by the assimilated observations. The only substantively circular element is the Section 3.1 fit-to-observation metric: |OMB|-|OMA| is positive by construction for assimilated observations because the analysis minimizes exactly that observation misfit; the paper itself calls this a diagnostic check. Self-citations are present (Barré et al. 2019 for EDA reducing inflation need; Abdi-Oskouei et al. 2022 for VOC-limited ozone regimes), but they are not load-bearing: the EDA spread is demonstrated in the experiment, and the VOC remark is a secondary interpretation. The paper transparently reports mixed independent results, including degradation against AirNow and GCAS, so no prediction is disguised as a fit. Overall circularity is minor and does not undermine the capability demonstration.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The ledger is dominated by hand-tuned DA configuration parameters (localization, emission perturbation magnitudes and scales) and standard DA assumptions rather than fitted physical constants. The paper introduces no new physical entities. The most fragile inputs are the assumed unbiasedness of TEMPO retrievals and the adequacy of vertical localization, both of which the authors themselves flag.

free parameters (5)
  • Horizontal localization radius (NICAS) = 100 km at surface to 5000 km at TOA
    Hand-set in Section 2.3.2; governs spatial spread of TEMPO and TROPOMI information and affects all increments.
  • Vertical localization scale (eta) = 0.3 uniform
    Chosen in Section 2.3.2; the paper says this could benefit from further refinement, and it controls the vertical propagation that may cause surface degradation.
  • Emission perturbation magnitudes by sector = Agriculture 75%, Energy 30%, Industry 30%, Residential 45%, Ships 40%, Solvents 50%, Traffic 35%, Waste 55%
    Table 1: hand-tuned multiplicative perturbations that set ensemble spread near the surface; they are static over the whole experiment.
  • Emission spatial correlation lengths = 500 km for Agriculture, Ships, and Waste; 200 km for others
    Table 1: hand-tuned correlation scales that shape ensemble error patterns.
  • Observation error standard deviations = reported retrieval errors, assumed Gaussian
    Section 2.5: observation perturbations use reported errors without independent validation of the error covariance.
assumptions (6)
  • standard math The 4DEnVar ensemble subspace spans the true background error covariance.
    Section 2.3.3 relies on projecting the cost function into the ensemble subspace; this is the standard 4DEnVar assumption.
  • domain assumption TEMPO and TROPOMI tropospheric NO2 retrievals are unbiased after the cloud fraction, SZA, and qa_value filters.
    Section 2.1 filters are applied but retrieval biases are not characterized; Section 4 later suggests TEMPO may have a high bias.
  • domain assumption Observation and model errors are Gaussian, zero-mean, and independent for the EDA perturbations.
    Section 2.5: perturbations are generated from Gaussian noise with reported variances; no check of normality or independence is provided.
  • domain assumption GEOS-FP replay meteorology and its ensemble represent transport uncertainty in the composition system.
    Section 2.4: the model uses archived meteorological analyses and ensembles without re-assimilating meteorological observations.
  • domain assumption The column retrieval operator correctly converts model NO2 to retrieval space using averaging kernels and a priori profiles.
    Section 2.3.1: the operator is taken from JEDI documentation and trusted for all four retrieval products.
  • domain assumption The model's NO2-O3 photochemistry responds realistically to NO2 increments.
    Section 3.4: ozone improvements are attributed to chemical response to NO2 reductions, assuming the mechanism and VOC emission inputs are adequate.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Capability demonstration of a JEDI-based system for TEMPO assimilation: system description and evaluation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YJ46RSEL

@misc{pith2026250607321,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Capability demonstration of a JEDI-based system for TEMPO assimilation: system description and evaluation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/YJ46RSEL}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.07321}
}
read the original abstract

The launch of the Tropospheric Emissions: Monitoring of Pollution (TEMPO) mission in 2023 marked a new era in air quality monitoring by providing high-frequency, geostationary observations of column NO2 across North America. In this study, we present the first implementation of a TEMPO NO2 data assimilation system using the Joint Effort for Data assimilation Integration (JEDI) framework. Leveraging a four-dimensional ensemble variational (4DEnVar) approach and an Ensemble of Data Assimilations (EDA), we demonstrate a novel capability to assimilate hourly NO2 retrievals from TEMPO alongside polar-orbiting TROPOMI data into NASA's GEOS Composition Forecast (GEOS-CF) model. The system is evaluated over the CONUS region for August 2023, using a suite of independent measurements including Pandora spectrometers, AirNow surface stations, and aircraft-based observations from AEROMMA and STAQS field campaigns. Results show that the assimilation system successfully integrates geostationary NO2 observations, improves model performance in the column, and captures diurnal variability. However, assimilation also leads to systematic reductions in surface NO2 levels, improving agreement with some datasets (e.g., Pandora, AEROMMA) but degrading comparisons with others (e.g., AirNow). These findings highlight the importance of joint evaluation across platforms and motivate further development of dual-concentration emission assimilation schemes. While the system imposes high computational costs, primarily from the forecast model, ongoing efforts to integrate AI-based model emulators offer a promising path toward scalable, real-time assimilation of geostationary atmospheric composition data.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.07321 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Mean tropospheric NO2 column during 4 to 31 August 2023, measured by a) TROPOMI instrument, and b) TEMPO. Red boxes 1-Long Island, 2-Toronto, 3-Lake Michigan, 4-Salt Lake City, and 5-California indicate the study regions defined to encompass flight tracks from AEROMMA and STAQS field campaigns. In this study, we used TEMPO tropospheric NO2 vertical column Level-2, Version 3 during August 2023. Following the recommen… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Tropospheric NO2 column on 9 August 2023, a) measured by TROPOMI, b) the model equivalent values on [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Hourly binned tropospheric NO2 column measured by TEMPO on 9 August 2023 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (15 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Hourly model equivalent background tropospheric NO2 column or H(xb) on 9 August 2023 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Hourly fit to observation performance (|OMB| - |OMA|) on 9 August 2023 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Mean diurnal values of tropospheric NO2 column averaged over (a) CONUS and (b-f) study regions. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: RMS of NO2 partial column increments within the lower tropospheric layer (surface to 800hPa) for each assimilation window during the experiment period 15 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: RMS of hourly NO2 partial column increments within the lower tropospheric layer (surface to 800hPa) for each assimilation window during the experiment period system. A comparison between panels (a) and (b) of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: NO2 partial column increment within a) 800 hPa to TOA and b) surface to 800 hPa (free troposphere) on 9 August 2023. Hours with increment values of zero are excluded (3Z to 9Z) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Vertical distribution of NO2 increment in number density unit of 1e9 molec/cm3 during 9 August 2023. The blue and red lines show the RMS and the mean of the increment, respectively. A log scale is used for the Y-axis, and a symlog scale with a threshold of 0.5 is used…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Ensemble spread of prior (left column) and posterior (right column) at a and b) 4 August 2023, 12Z, b, d) 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Ensemble spread of prior (left column) and posterior (right column) at a and b) 30 August 2023, 12Z, b, d) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Mean diurnal values of total NO2 column measured by Pandora over CONUS in (a) rural with 6 stations, (b) suburban with 5 stations, and (c) urban classification with 36 stations. Observation values are in black, and the model-equivalent values of the 32mem and noDA urb…
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Boxplots of tropospheric NO2 column measured by GCAS during the STAQS field campaign. Colors grey, red, and blue represent observation, noDA experiment, and 32mem experiment, respectively. 3.4 Impacts on ozone In this study, we did not choose to use the ensemble infor…
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Boxplots of in situ NO2 (a) and ozone (b) concentrations measured during the AEROMMA field campaign. Each box’s bottom and top edges represent the 25th (Q1) and 75th (Q3) percentiles, respectively, while the line inside the box denotes the median value. Whiskers exten…
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Mean diurnal values of surface NO2 and ozone concentration averaged over CONUS for rural sites(a and d), suburban sites (b and e), and urban sites (c and f). Observation values are in black, and the model-equivalent values of noDA and 32mem experiments are in red and …
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: Hourly mean surface NO2 mixing ratio difference between 32mem and noDA experiments (32mem - noDA) from 4 to 31 August 2023 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_17.png]
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: Hourly mean surface O3 mixing ratio difference between 32mem and noDA experiments (32mem - noDA) from 4 to 31 August 2023 4 Discussion and conclusion In this study, we present the first implementation of TEMPO NO2 data assimilation within the JEDI framework. TEMPO’s u…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

41 extracted references · 37 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    A Geostationary Satellite Constellation for Observing Global Air Quality : An International Path Forward , 2011

    CEOS Atmospheric Composition Constellation . A Geostationary Satellite Constellation for Observing Global Air Quality : An International Path Forward , 2011. URL https://ceos.org/observations/documents/AC-VC_Geostationary-Cx-for-Global-AQ-final_Apr2011.pdf

    work page 2011

  2. [2]

    Geostationary Satellite Constellation for Observing Global Air Quality : Geophysical Validation Needs , October 2019

    CEOS Atmospheric Compositin Virtual Constellation and CEOS Working Group on Calibration and Validation. Geostationary Satellite Constellation for Observing Global Air Quality : Geophysical Validation Needs , October 2019. URL https://ceos.org/observations/documents/GEO_AQ_Constellation_Geophysical_Validation_Needs_1.1_2Oct2019.pdf

    work page 2019

  3. [3]

    On the feasibility of monitoring carbon monoxide in the lower troposphere from a constellation of Northern Hemisphere geostationary satellites

    Jérôme Barré, David Edwards, Helen Worden, Arlindo Da Silva, and William Lahoz. On the feasibility of monitoring carbon monoxide in the lower troposphere from a constellation of Northern Hemisphere geostationary satellites. ( Part 1). Atmospheric Environment, 113: 0 63--77, July 2015. ISSN 13522310. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.04.069. URL https://linkingh...

    work page doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.04.069 2015

  4. [4]

    Jérôme Barré, David Edwards, Helen Worden, Avelino Arellano, Benjamin Gaubert, Arlindo Da Silva, William Lahoz, and Jeffrey Anderson. On the feasibility of monitoring carbon monoxide in the lower troposphere from a constellation of northern hemisphere geostationary satellites: Global scale assimilation experiments ( Part II ). Atmospheric Environment, 140...

    work page doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.06.001 2016

  5. [5]

    Fishman, L

    J. Fishman, L. T. Iraci, J. Al-Saadi, K. Chance, F. Chavez, M. Chin, P. Coble, C. Davis, P. M. DiGiacomo, D. Edwards, A. Eldering, J. Goes, J. Herman, C. Hu, D. J. Jacob, C. Jordan, S. R. Kawa, R. Key, X. Liu, S. Lohrenz, A. Mannino, V. Natraj, D. Neil, J. Neu, M. Newchurch, K. Pickering, J. Salisbury, H. Sosik, A. Subramaniam, M. Tzortziou, J. Wang, and ...

    work page 2012

  6. [6]

    Advancing the Science of Both Coastal Ocean Biophysics and Atmospheric Pollution Chemistry : A final report to the NASA Earth Science Division by the GEO - CAPE team, 2018

    Jay Al-Saadi, Mian Chin, Arlindo da Silva, David Edwards, Greg Frost, Daven Henze, Laura Iraci, Daniel Jacob, Antonio Mannino, Vijay Natraj, Brad Pierce, Joe Salisbury, and Jun Wang. Advancing the Science of Both Coastal Ocean Biophysics and Atmospheric Pollution Chemistry : A final report to the NASA Earth Science Division by the GEO - CAPE team, 2018

    work page 2018

  7. [7]

    Kim, Rokjin J

    Jhoon Kim, Ukkyo Jeong, Myoung-Hwan Ahn, Jae H. Kim, Rokjin J. Park, Hanlim Lee, Chul Han Song, Yong-Sang Choi, Kwon-Ho Lee, Jung-Moon Yoo, Myeong-Jae Jeong, Seon Ki Park, Kwang-Mog Lee, Chang-Keun Song, Sang-Woo Kim, Young Joon Kim, Si-Wan Kim, Mijin Kim, Sujung Go, Xiong Liu, Kelly Chance, Christopher Chan Miller, Jay Al-Saadi, Ben Veihelmann, Pawan K. ...

    work page 2020

  8. [8]

    Edwards, Sara Martínez-Alonso, Duseong S

    David P. Edwards, Sara Martínez-Alonso, Duseong S. Jo, Ivan Ortega, Louisa K. Emmons, John J. Orlando, Helen M. Worden, Jhoon Kim, Hanlim Lee, Junsung Park, and Hyunkee Hong. Quantifying the diurnal variation in atmospheric NO _ 2 from Geostationary Environment Monitoring Spectrometer ( GEMS ) observations. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 24 0 (15): 0 ...

    work page doi:10.5194/acp-24-8943-2024 2024

Show all 41 references
  1. [9]

    Zoogman, X

    P. Zoogman, X. Liu, R.M. Suleiman, W.F. Pennington, D.E. Flittner, J.A. Al-Saadi, B.B. Hilton, D.K. Nicks, M.J. Newchurch, J.L. Carr, S.J. Janz, M.R. Andraschko, A. Arola, B.D. Baker, B.P. Canova, C. Chan Miller, R.C. Cohen, J.E. Davis, M.E. Dussault, D.P. Edwards, J. Fishman,...

    2017

  2. [10]

    Henze, Arthur P

    Chia-Hua Hsu, Daven K. Henze, Arthur P. Mizzi, Gonzalo González Abad, Jian He, Colin Harkins, Aaron R. Naeger, Congmeng Lyu, Xiong Liu, Christopher Chan Miller, R. Bradley Pierce, Matthew S. Johnson, and Brian C. McDonald. An Observing System Simulation Experiment Analysis of ...

    2024 doi

  3. [11]

    Miyazaki, T

    K. Miyazaki, T. Sekiya, D. Fu, K. W. Bowman, S. S. Kulawik, K. Sudo, T. Walker, Y. Kanaya, M. Takigawa, K. Ogochi, H. Eskes, K. F. Boersma, A. M. Thompson, B. Gaubert, J. Barre, and L. K. Emmons. Balance of Emission and Dynamical Controls on Ozone During the Korea ‐ United Sta...

    2019 doi

  4. [12]

    Bowman, Keiya Yumimoto, Thomas Walker, and Kengo Sudo

    Kazuyuki Miyazaki, Kevin W. Bowman, Keiya Yumimoto, Thomas Walker, and Kengo Sudo. Evaluation of a multi-model, multi-constituent assimilation framework for tropospheric chemical reanalysis. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 20 0 (2): 0 931--967, January 2020. ISSN 1680-7316....

    2020 doi

  5. [13]

    James, Curtis R

    Eric P. James, Curtis R. Alexander, David C. Dowell, Stephen S. Weygandt, Stanley G. Benjamin, Geoffrey S. Manikin, John M. Brown, Joseph B. Olson, Ming Hu, Tatiana G. Smirnova, Terra Ladwig, Jaymes S. Kenyon, and David D. Turner. The High - Resolution Rapid Refresh ( HRRR ): ...

    2022 doi

  6. [14]

    Benjamin, Stephen S

    Stanley G. Benjamin, Stephen S. Weygandt, John M. Brown, Ming Hu, Curtis R. Alexander, Tatiana G. Smirnova, Joseph B. Olson, Eric P. James, David C. Dowell, Georg A. Grell, Haidao Lin, Steven E. Peckham, Tracy Lorraine Smith, William R. Moninger, Jaymes S. Kenyon, and Geoffrey...

    2016 doi

  7. [15]

    The CAMS reanalysis of atmospheric composition

    Antje Inness, Melanie Ades, Anna Agustí-Panareda, Jérôme Barré, Anna Benedictow, Anne-Marlene Blechschmidt, Juan Jose Dominguez, Richard Engelen, Henk Eskes, Johannes Flemming, Vincent Huijnen, Luke Jones, Zak Kipling, Sebastien Massart, Mark Parrington, Vincent-Henri Peuch, M...

    2019 doi

  8. [16]

    Sector‐ Based Top ‐ Down Estimates of NOx , SO2 , and CO Emissions in East Asia

    Zhen Qu, Daven K Henze, Helen M Worden, Zhe Jiang, Benjamin Gaubert, Nicolas Theys, and Wei Wang. Sector‐ Based Top ‐ Down Estimates of NOx , SO2 , and CO Emissions in East Asia . Geophysical Research Letters, 49, 2022. doi:10.1029/2021GL096009

    2022 doi

  9. [17]

    The Joint Effort for Data Assimilation Integration ( JEDI )

    Yannick Trémolet and Thomas Auligné. The Joint Effort for Data Assimilation Integration ( JEDI ). JCSDA Quarterly Newsletter, 0 (66): 0 1--5, 2020. doi:10.25923/RB19-0Q26. URL https://repository.library.noaa.gov/view/noaa/22752. Publisher: Joint Center for Satellite Data Assim...

    2020 doi

  10. [18]

    Zhiquan Liu, Chris Snyder, Jonathan J. Guerrette, Byoung-Joo Jung, Junmei Ban, Steven Vahl, Yali Wu, Yannick Trémolet, Thomas Auligné, Benjamin Ménétrier, Anna Shlyaeva, Stephen Herbener, Emily Liu, Daniel Holdaway, and Benjamin T. Johnson. Data assimilation for the Model for ...

    2022

  11. [19]

    Guerrette, Zhiquan Liu, Chris Snyder, Byoung-Joo Jung, Craig S

    Jonathan J. Guerrette, Zhiquan Liu, Chris Snyder, Byoung-Joo Jung, Craig S. Schwartz, Junmei Ban, Steven Vahl, Yali Wu, Ivette Hernández Baños, Yonggang G. Yu, Soyoung Ha, Yannick Trémolet, Thomas Auligné, Clementine Gas, Benjamin Ménétrier, Anna Shlyaeva, Mark Miesch, Stephen...

    2023

  12. [20]

    Martin, Andrew Tangborn, Shobha Kondragunta, and Daryl T

    Bo Huang, Mariusz Pagowski, Samuel Trahan, Cory R. Martin, Andrew Tangborn, Shobha Kondragunta, and Daryl T. Kleist. JEDI - Based Three - Dimensional Ensemble - Variational Data Assimilation System for Global Aerosol Forecasting at NCEP . Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth ...

    2023 doi

  13. [21]

    The prototype NOAA Aerosol Reanalysis version 1.0: description of the modeling system and its evaluation

    Shih-Wei Wei, Mariusz Pagowski, Arlindo Da Silva, Cheng-Hsuan Lu, and Bo Huang. The prototype NOAA Aerosol Reanalysis version 1.0: description of the modeling system and its evaluation. Geoscientific Model Development, 17 0 (2): 0 795--813, January 2024. ISSN 1991-9603. doi:10...

    2024 doi

  14. [22]

    N. E. Bowler, A. M. Clayton, M. Jardak, P. M. Jermey, A. C. Lorenc, M. A. Wlasak, D. M. Barker, G. W. Inverarity, and R. Swinbank. The effect of improved ensemble covariances on hybrid variational data assimilation. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 143 0 ...

    2017 doi

  15. [23]

    Keller, K

    Christoph A. Keller, K. Emma Knowland, Bryan N. Duncan, Junhua Liu, Daniel C. Anderson, Sampa Das, Robert A. Lucchesi, Elizabeth W. Lundgren, Julie M. Nicely, Eric Nielsen, Lesley E. Ott, Emily Saunders, Sarah A. Strode, Pamela A. Wales, Daniel J. Jacob, and Steven Pawson. Des...

    2021 doi

  16. [24]

    Isaksen, Massimo Bonavita, Roberto Buizza, Mike Fisher, J

    L. Isaksen, Massimo Bonavita, Roberto Buizza, Mike Fisher, J. Haseler, Martin Leutbecher, and Laure Raynaud. Ensemble of data assimilations at ECMWF , December 2010. URL https://www.ecmwf.int/node/10125. Issue: 636 Pages: 45 Publication Title: ECMWF Technical Memoranda

    2010

  17. [25]

    Nowlan, Xiong Liu, James W

    Caroline R. Nowlan, Xiong Liu, James W. Leitch, Kelly Chance, Gonzalo González Abad, Cheng Liu, Peter Zoogman, Joshua Cole, Thomas Delker, William Good, Frank Murcray, Lyle Ruppert, Daniel Soo, Melanie B. Follette-Cook, Scott J. Janz, Matthew G. Kowalewski, Christopher P. Loug...

    2013

  18. [26]

    Nowlan, Gonzalo Gonzalez Abad, Xiong Liu, Huiqun Wang , and Kelly Chance

    Caroline R. Nowlan, Gonzalo Gonzalez Abad, Xiong Liu, Huiqun Wang , and Kelly Chance. TEMPO Nitrogen Dioxide Retrieval Algorithm Theoretical Basis Document , 2025. URL https://www.earthdata.nasa.gov/apt/documents/tempo-nitrogen-dioxide-retrieval/v1.0. Publisher: NASA Algorithm...

    2025

  19. [27]

    J. H. G. M. van Geffen, H. J. Eskes, K. F. Boersma, and J. P. Veefkind. TROPOMI ATBD of the total and tropospheric NO2 data products, July 2022. URL https://sentinel.esa.int/documents/247904/2476257/Sentinel-5P-TROPOMI-ATBD-NO2-data-products

    2022

  20. [28]

    Veefkind, I

    J.P. Veefkind, I. Aben, K. McMullan, H. Förster, J. De Vries, G. Otter, J. Claas, H.J. Eskes, J.F. De Haan, Q. Kleipool, M. Van Weele, O. Hasekamp, R. Hoogeveen, J. Landgraf, R. Snel, P. Tol, P. Ingmann, R. Voors, B. Kruizinga, R. Vink, H. Visser, and P.F. Levelt. TROPOMI on t...

    2012

  21. [29]

    NO _ 2 column amounts from ground-based Pandora and MFDOAS spectrometers using the direct-sun DOAS technique: Intercomparisons and application to OMI validation

    Jay Herman, Alexander Cede, Elena Spinei, George Mount, Maria Tzortziou, and Nader Abuhassan. NO _ 2 column amounts from ground-based Pandora and MFDOAS spectrometers using the direct-sun DOAS technique: Intercomparisons and application to OMI validation. Journal of Geophysica...

    2009 doi

  22. [30]

    Jing Gao and Brian C. O’Neill. Mapping global urban land for the 21st century with data-driven simulations and Shared Socioeconomic Pathways . Nature Communications, 11 0 (1): 0 2302, May 2020. ISSN 2041-1723. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-15788-7. URL https://www.nature.com/articles...

    2020 doi

  23. [31]

    AEROMMA : Atmospheric Emission and Reactions Observed from Megacities and Marine Aeroas

    NOAA-CSL. AEROMMA : Atmospheric Emission and Reactions Observed from Megacities and Marine Aeroas . URL https://csl.noaa.gov/projects/aeromma/

  24. [32]

    STAQS : Synergistic TEMPO Air Quality Science

    NASA. STAQS : Synergistic TEMPO Air Quality Science . URL https://www-air.larc.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/ArcView/staqs

  25. [33]

    Kowalewski and Scott J

    Matthew G. Kowalewski and Scott J. Janz. Remote sensing capabilities of the GEO - CAPE airborne simulator. In Earth observing systems XIX , volume 9218, pages 496--507, San Diego, California, United States, September 2014. doi:10.1117/12.2062058. URL http://proceedings.spiedig...

    2014 doi

  26. [34]

    Normalized Interpolated Convolution from an Adaptive Subgrid documentation, 2020

    Benjamin Ménétrier. Normalized Interpolated Convolution from an Adaptive Subgrid documentation, 2020. URL https://github.com/benjaminmenetrier/nicas_doc/blob/master/nicas_doc.pdf

    2020

  27. [35]

    Kleist and Kayo Ide

    Daryl T. Kleist and Kayo Ide. An OSSE - Based Evaluation of Hybrid Variational – Ensemble Data Assimilation for the NCEP GFS . Part II : 4DEnVar and Hybrid Variants . Monthly Weather Review, 143 0 (2): 0 452--470, February 2015. ISSN 0027-0644, 1520-0493. doi:10.1175/MWR-D-13-...

    2015 doi

  28. [36]

    Historical (1750–2014) anthropogenic emissions of reactive gases and aerosols from the Community Emissions Data System ( CEDS )

    Rachel M Hoesly, Steven J Smith, Leyang Feng, Zbigniew Klimont, Greet Janssens-Maenhout, Tyler Pitkanen, Jonathan J Seibert, Linh Vu, Robert J Andres, Ryan M Bolt, Tami C Bond, Laura Dawidowski, Nazar Kholod, June-ichi Kurokawa, Meng Li, Liang Liu, Zifeng Lu, Maria Cecilia P M...

    2014

  29. [37]

    C. A. Keller, M. S. Long, R. M. Yantosca, A. M. Da Silva, S. Pawson, and D. J. Jacob. HEMCO v1.0: a versatile, ESMF -compliant component for calculating emissions in atmospheric models. Geoscientific Model Development, 7 0 (4): 0 1409--1417, July 2014. ISSN 1991-9603. doi:10.5...

    2014 doi

  30. [38]

    Jacob, Elizabeth W

    Haipeng Lin, Daniel J. Jacob, Elizabeth W. Lundgren, Melissa P. Sulprizio, Christoph A. Keller, Thibaud M. Fritz, Sebastian D. Eastham, Louisa K. Emmons, Patrick C. Campbell, Barry Baker, Rick D. Saylor, and Raffaele Montuoro. Harmonized Emissions Component ( HEMCO ) 3.0 as a ...

    2021

  31. [39]

    Oman, Susan E

    Clara Orbe, Luke D. Oman, Susan E. Strahan, Darryn W. Waugh, Steven Pawson, Lawrence L. Takacs, and Andrea M. Molod. Large- Scale Atmospheric Transport in GEOS Replay Simulations . Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 9 0 (7): 0 2545--2560, 2017. ISSN 1942-2466. doi:...

    2017 doi

  32. [40]

    Emission optimisations first attempt based on the Ensemble of Data Assimilation for atmospheric composition, June 2019

    Jérôme Barré, Sebastien Massart, Melanie Ades, Luke Jones, and Richard Engelen. Emission optimisations first attempt based on the Ensemble of Data Assimilation for atmospheric composition, June 2019. URL https://www.ecmwf.int/sites/default/files/elibrary/2019/19085-emission-op...

    2019

  33. [41]

    Stanier, Megan Christiansen, Gabriele Pfister, R

    Maryam Abdi-Oskouei, Behrooz Roozitalab, Charles O. Stanier, Megan Christiansen, Gabriele Pfister, R. Bradley Pierce, Brian C. McDonald, Zac Adelman, Mark Janseen, Angela F. Dickens, and Gregory R. Carmichael. The Impact of Volatile Chemical Products , Other VOCs , and NOx on ...

    2022 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.