Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

Traces of the evolution of cosmic void galaxies: An Integral Field Spectroscopy based analysis

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Void galaxies are younger and less metal-rich than comparable non-void galaxies.

desk verdict Reasonable MaNGA-based confirmation of delayed void assembly, but the magnitude-matched control does not exclude a stellar-mass offset, and the abstract overstates a mass analysis that is not in the paper. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.07783 v2 pith:24KCLV7T submitted 2025-06-09 astro-ph.GA

Agustín M. Rodríguez-Medrano , Dante J. Paz , Damián Mast , Federico A. Stasyszyn , Andrés N. Ruiz This is my paper
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords cosmicvoidsgalaxyevolutionintegralfieldspectroscopyMaNGAstellarmetallicityageenvironmentSDSS
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tests a numerical prediction that galaxies in cosmic voids assemble later than galaxies elsewhere, using integral field spectroscopy from the MaNGA survey. It compares 176 void galaxies with a non-void control sample constructed to mimic the same r-band brightness distribution, and it stacks spatially resolved age and metallicity profiles for early- and late-type galaxies separately. The central finding is that void galaxies host younger and less metal-rich stellar populations, with the difference surviving brightness matching and appearing in both morphological classes. A matched analysis of gas mass, by contrast, finds no environmental difference. The authors read this as evidence that the void environment delays galaxy assembly and growth.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing tool is the magnitude-matched control sample: since void galaxies are fainter on average, and faint galaxies are younger and less metal-rich, the paper builds a non-void sample that reproduces the void sample's r-band absolute magnitude distribution with ten times more galaxies, so any residual age and metallicity offsets cannot be blamed on brightness. The second mechanism is the stacking of radial metallicity and age profiles from the MEGACUBES MaNGA datacubes, which lets the authors compare mean profiles in radial bins out to roughly 1.75 effective radii for early- and late-type galaxies separately.

What would settle it

Match the control sample simultaneously in r-band magnitude, stellar mass, star formation rate, redshift, and integral-field spatial coverage, then re-measure the stacked age and metallicity profiles; if the offsets disappear, the environmental claim is not supported.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Using voids identified in SDSS with a spherical-underdensity void finder and MaNGA integral-field datacubes, the paper claims that at fixed r-band absolute magnitude void galaxies are systematically younger and more metal-poor than non-void galaxies. After resampling the non-void sample to reproduce the void sample's magnitude distribution, Kolmogorov–Smirnov tests reject equality of the age and metallicity distributions (p = 0.03 and p = 0.01). The same offsets appear in stacked radial profiles separated by morphology: early-type void galaxies are younger and less metal-rich at all radii, and late-type void galaxies are younger, especially in their outer discs, while late-type metallicity gradients are not significantly different. The authors interpret this as delayed assembly and growth in underdense regions, consistent with their earlier work with the IllustrisTNG simulation.

Load-bearing premise

The non-void control sample is assumed to be otherwise comparable to the void sample once r-band magnitudes are matched, so unverified differences in redshift, stellar mass, star formation rate, or integral-field coverage could mimic the measured age and metallicity offsets.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • At a given r-band magnitude, void galaxies are younger and less metal-rich, so brightness differences are not the cause of the environmental offsets.
  • The effect appears in both early-type and late-type galaxies, indicating it is not a simple morphological selection effect.
  • Late-type void galaxies show younger outer discs, pointing to delayed or extended star formation in their discs.
  • No gas-mass difference is measured between environments, suggesting that any predicted gas excess may live in fainter, lower-mass galaxies than MaNGA's bright sample.
  • The age and metallicity offsets strengthen the delayed-assembly picture drawn from simulations and earlier observational studies.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct test would be to repeat the comparison with redshift, stellar mass, star formation rate, and integral-field spatial coverage matched simultaneously; the current appendix only checks redshift versus magnitude for the full samples.
  • Because the simulations predict the largest gas excess in low-mass void galaxies, a fainter integral-field sample or targeted neutral-hydrogen follow-up of the same voids could decide whether the null gas result is real or a sample-selection artifact.
  • If younger populations in void discs are confirmed with larger samples, that would support a picture in which void galaxies assemble their discs later, not merely form stars over a longer period.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. This paper uses MaNGA integral-field spectroscopy to compare galaxies in cosmic voids, identified from SDSS DR12 with the authors' own void finder, with non-void galaxies. After noting that the void sample is fainter than the non-void sample, the authors construct a magnitude-matched non-void control and compare integrated stellar metallicities, ages, gas masses, morphological fractions, and radial gradients. They report that void galaxies are younger and less metal-rich in both binned comparisons and in matched-distribution KS tests (p=0.01 and 0.03), that gas content does not differ with environment, and that age and metallicity gradients are generally negative with void galaxies offset to younger ages and lower metallicities. The paper interprets these differences as evidence that the void environment delays galaxy assembly and growth, in agreement with the authors' previous IllustrisTNG-based predictions.

Significance. If the environmental interpretation is correct, the paper provides a valuable observational test of simulation predictions about delayed evolution in cosmic voids, and it exploits the spatial information of MaNGA through stacked radial profiles. The use of magnitude-matched samples, explicit KS tests, and a candid discussion of gas-mass limitations are strengths. However, the central claim rests on matching r-band luminosity rather than stellar mass, and the paper does not yet establish that the measured age and metallicity offsets are not simply consequences of the well-known mass-age and mass-metallicity relations. Because this issue is addressable with existing data, the result is promising but not yet fully validated.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sections 3.1 and 3.3, Figs. 2 and 6] The central magnitude-matched comparison controls only r-band luminosity, not stellar mass. Fig. 2 shows that at fixed Mr void galaxies are bluer and have higher SFRs than non-void galaxies, implying that they have systematically lower stellar mass-to-light ratios and therefore lower stellar masses in the matched void sample. Since stellar age and metallicity correlate strongly with stellar mass, the KS results in Fig. 6 (p=0.01 for metallicity, p=0.03 for age) do not uniquely identify an environmental effect. A comparison at fixed stellar mass, or a demonstration that the magnitude-matched non-void control also matches the void sample in stellar mass, SFR, and IFU Primary/Secondary coverage, is required to support the environmental interpretation.
  2. [Abstract and Section 4] The abstract states that the younger and less metal-rich trend is observed 'as a function of mass', but the body of the paper never bins or matches by stellar mass; the analyses use r-band absolute magnitude throughout (Figs. 2 and 3). This internal inconsistency should be resolved either by adding a stellar-mass-based analysis or by removing the phrase and explicitly limiting claims to comparisons at fixed luminosity.
  3. [Section 3.4, Fig. 7, and Section 5] The profile stacking results are used to claim that evolutionary differences are evident for both early- and late-type galaxies, but the individual profile points are significant at only about 1 sigma in most bins, and the text itself notes that the LTG metallicity gradients are statistically indistinguishable between environments. A stacked-profile significance test that uses all radial bins or compares the fitted gradients jointly would be needed before making the strong final-bullet conclusion in Section 5 that the differences are evident for both morphological classes.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Fig. 7 caption] The caption states that the left columns show LTGs and the right columns show ETGs, but the panel labels and the text in Section 3.4 indicate the opposite; this should be corrected.
  2. [Fig. 8 caption] The caption defines the old population as '2 Gyr < t < 5 Gyr', while the text in Section 3.4 defines old as '5 Gyr < t ≤ 13 Gyr'; one of these is a typographical error and should be corrected.
  3. [Section 2] The sentence 'MaNGA and SDSS surveys occupy the same spatial region' cites Bacon et al. (2001) for SDSS; the correct survey reference is York et al. (2000), which is already in the bibliography.
  4. [Section 4 and abstract] The gas-mass null result is based only on the Secondary Sample and is acknowledged in Section 4 to depend on inclination and SFR; the abstract's unqualified statement that gas content does not differ should carry a qualifier reflecting these limitations.
  5. [Fig. 4 and Section 3.2] The morphological fraction test (p=0.02) is performed on the unmatched void and non-void samples, so it is not protected from the magnitude bias that the paper itself emphasizes in Section 3.3; a magnitude-matched morphological comparison would strengthen this supporting claim.
  6. [Various] There are several typographical errors, including 'non-voids' in Fig. 2, 'brigther' in Section 4, 'environement' in Section 5, 'the the' in Section 3.4, and 'V oids' in Section 2.3; these should be fixed in the revision.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the MaNGA-based analysis is self-contained and the simulation predictions are used only as external benchmarks.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is not circular. Stellar metallicities, ages, SFRs, and gas masses are measured from MaNGA datacubes using independent pipelines (pyPipe3D and MEGACUBES/STARLIGHT), and the void/non-void classification uses a public SDSS-based void catalog (Ruiz et al. 2015, 2019) plus a distance criterion that does not involve any of the target astrophysical properties. The magnitude-matching procedure in Section 3.3 controls for the r-band luminosity distribution; it does not fit, assume, or otherwise inject the age or metallicity differences, so the subsequent KS-test results are free to disagree with the simulation expectations. The repeated citations to Rodríguez-Medrano et al. (2024) and other same-group works are used as benchmarks or prior motivation, not as inputs to any equation, fitting step, or sample selection, so the self-citation flavor is not load-bearing. The legitimate concern is the confound flagged in the skeptical reading: matching on Mr need not match stellar mass, and the paper's own Fig. 2 shows void galaxies are bluer at fixed Mr, implying lower mass-to-light ratios; Appendix A checks redshift versus magnitude but not stellar mass, SFR, or IFU coverage for the matched samples, and no fixed-stellar-mass analysis appears despite the abstract's claim that the trend is observed as a function of mass. These are correctness and interpretation risks, not circularity, because the observational measurements remain independent of the simulation predictions and the control-sample construction does not force the result. No specific reduction of a claimed prediction to its inputs was found.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new particles, forces, or fitted theoretical models are introduced. The age and metallicity comparison is a direct observational measurement with no fitting parameters. The ledger records the chosen void-selection thresholds and the key modeling assumptions about spectral fitting, control-sample comparability, and statistics.

free parameters (3)
  • Void contrast threshold = delta = -0.9
    Chosen in Section 2.3 from the Ruiz et al. void finder convention; it defines which underdense spheres count as voids and is not fitted to this paper's result.
  • Minimum void radius = 12 h^-1 Mpc
    Chosen in Section 2.3 to avoid shot-noise voids; it changes the composition of the void galaxy sample.
  • Magnitude-matching resampling factor = 10 times more non-void galaxies
    The non-void sample is resampled to mimic the void magnitude distribution, and the 10x factor is a procedure choice that changes the effective noise of the control sample.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The spherical void finder with integrated contrast delta < -0.9 traces the underdense environments relevant to galaxy evolution.
    Section 2.3 uses this threshold and the Ruiz et al. algorithm; if the void tracing is wrong, the void/non-void classification is wrong.
  • domain assumption Light-weighted age and metallicity at the effective radius, derived from pyPipe3D and STARLIGHT fits, are representative of galaxy-wide stellar populations.
    Section 3.1 uses Re values as a galaxy-wide proxy, relying on earlier work; systematic fitting biases would propagate to all comparisons.
  • domain assumption The MaStar and MILES stellar population libraries with a Salpeter IMF do not introduce environment-dependent biases in the recovered age and metallicity trends.
    Sections 2.1 and 2.2 describe the spectral fitting setup; if these models bias void and non-void galaxies differently, the measured trends would be spurious.
  • domain assumption The magnitude-matched non-void control sample is otherwise comparable to the void sample in redshift, mass, SFR, and IFU coverage.
    This is the load-bearing comparability assumption in Section 3.3 and Appendix A; residual differences could mimic environmental offsets.
  • standard math Standard statistical tests, including the KS test and error-of-the-mean intervals, are valid for the sample sizes used.
    Used throughout Section 3 on samples of 176 void galaxies and thousands of non-void galaxies; the p-values are only moderately below 0.05.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Traces of the evolution of cosmic void galaxies: An Integral Field Spectroscopy based analysis." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/24KCLV7T

@misc{pith2026250607783,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Traces of the evolution of cosmic void galaxies: An Integral Field Spectroscopy based analysis},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/24KCLV7T}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.07783}
}
read the original abstract

Galaxies in the most underdense regions of the Universe, known as cosmic voids, exhibit astrophysical properties that suggest a distinct evolutionary path compared to galaxies in denser environments. Numerical simulations indicate that the assembly of void galaxies occurs later, leading to galaxies with younger stellar populations, low metallicities, and a high gas content in their halos, which provides the fuel to sustain elevated star formation activity. Our objective in this work is to test these numerical predictions with observational data by comparing galaxies in voids with galaxies in non-void environments. We used voids identified in SDSS data and galaxies from the MaNGA survey, which provides galaxies with integral field spectroscopy (IFS). We separated the galaxies into void and non-void samples, mimicked the magnitude distribution, and compared their integrated astrophysical properties as well as the metallicity and age profiles through a stacking technique, ETGs and LTGs separately. We find that void galaxies have younger and less metal-rich stellar populations. Regarding gas mass, we do not find differences across environments. When dividing galaxies into ETGs and LTGs, we observe that ETGs show negative gradients in both age and metallicity, with void galaxies consistently appearing younger and less metal-rich. For LTGs, age gradients are also negative, showing younger populations in void galaxies. However, we do not find statistically significant differences in stellar metallicity gradients between void and non-void environments. Our results show how the astrophysical properties of galaxies in voids differ from those of galaxies in the rest of the Universe. This suggests that the void environment plays a role in the evolution of its galaxies, delaying their assembly and growth.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.07783 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Distribution of r-band absolute magnitudes for the galaxy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Astrophysical properties of galaxies as a function of r [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Fraction of early-type (ETGs) and late-type galaxies [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Astrophysical properties of galaxies as a function of r [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Distribution of stellar properties for void and non-void [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The left panel shows the distribution of stellar metallicity for a sample of non-void galaxies that mimics the r-band absolute [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Profiles of the mean stellar metallicity (top panels) and age (bottom panels). The left columns show the profiles for late-type [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The figure shows the profiles of mean fraction of stars in di [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The role of filaments in the large-scale conformity signal

    astro-ph.GA 2026-07 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    Filamentary regions of the cosmic web are the primary contributors to the residual large-scale conformity signal of low-mass central galaxies in both SAG and TNG300.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 27 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    N., Adelman-McCarthy, J

    Abazajian, K. N., Adelman-McCarthy, J. K., Agüeros, M. A., et al. 2009, ApJS, 182, 543

    2009

  2. [2]

    D., Allende Prieto, C., et al

    Alam, S., Albareti, F. D., Allende Prieto, C., et al. 2015, ApJS, 219, 12

    2015

  3. [3]

    G., Rodriguez, F., Ruiz, A

    Alfaro, I. G., Rodriguez, F., Ruiz, A. N., & Lambas, D. G. 2020, A&A, 638, A60 Argudo-Fernández, M., Gómez Hernández, C., Verley, S., et al. 2024, A&A, 692, A258

    work page 2020

  4. [4]

    2001, MNRAS, 326, 23

    Bacon, R., Copin, Y ., Monnet, G., et al. 2001, MNRAS, 326, 23

    work page 2001

  5. [5]

    K., Heckman, T., Sánchez, S

    Barrera-Ballesteros, J. K., Heckman, T., Sánchez, S. F., et al. 2021, ApJ, 909, 131

    work page 2021

  6. [6]

    Brinchmann, J., Charlot, S., White, S. D. M., et al. 2004, MNRAS, 351, 1151

    2004

  7. [7]

    A., Law, D

    Bundy, K., Bershady, M. A., Law, D. R., et al. 2015, ApJ, 798, 7

    2015

  8. [8]

    Ceccarelli, L., Padilla, N., & Lambas, D. G. 2008, MNRAS, 390, L9 Cid Fernandes, R. 2018, MNRAS, 480, 4480 Cid Fernandes, R., Mateus, A., Sodré, L., Stasi ´nska, G., & Gomes, J. M. 2005, MNRAS, 358, 363

    work page 2008

Show all 50 references
  1. [9]

    M., González Delgado, R

    Conrado, A. M., González Delgado, R. M., García-Benito, R., et al. 2024, A&A, 687, A98

    2024

  2. [10]

    M., Lawrence, J

    Croom, S. M., Lawrence, J. S., Bland-Hawthorn, J., et al. 2012, MNRAS, 421, 872

    2012

  3. [11]

    Curtis, O., McDonough, B., & Brainerd, T. G. 2024, ApJ, 962, 58

    2024

  4. [12]

    J., Lang, D., et al

    Dey, A., Schlegel, D. J., Lang, D., et al. 2019, AJ, 157, 168 Domínguez-Gómez, J., Lisenfeld, U., Pérez, I., et al. 2022, A&A, 658, A124 Domínguez-Gómez, J., Pérez, I., Ruiz-Lara, T., et al. 2023a, A&A, 680, A111 Domínguez-Gómez, J., Pérez, I., Ruiz-Lara, T., et al. 2023b, Nat...

    2019

  5. [13]

    A., Smith, J

    Douglass, K. A., Smith, J. A., & Demina, R. 2019, ApJ, 886, 153

    2019

  6. [14]

    A., Kannappan, S

    Florez, J., Berlind, A. A., Kannappan, S. J., et al. 2021, ApJ, 906, 97

    2021

  7. [15]

    Gallazzi, A., Charlot, S., Brinchmann, J., White, S. D. M., & Tremonti, C. A. 2005, MNRAS, 362, 41 García-Benito, R., González Delgado, R. M., Pérez, E., et al. 2017, A&A, 608, A27 González Delgado, R. M., Cerviño, M., Martins, L. P., Leitherer, C., &

    2005

  8. [16]

    Hauschildt, P. H. 2005, MNRAS, 357, 945 González Delgado, R. M., Pérez, E., Cid Fernandes, R., et al. 2014, A&A, 562, A47

    2005

  9. [17]

    2020, MNRAS, 493, 899

    Habouzit, M., Pisani, A., Goulding, A., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 493, 899

    2020

  10. [18]

    R., V ogeley, M

    Hoyle, F., Rojas, R. R., V ogeley, M. S., & Brinkmann, J. 2005, ApJ, 620, 618

    2005

  11. [19]

    S., & Pan, D

    Hoyle, F., V ogeley, M. S., & Pan, D. 2012, MNRAS, 426, 3041

    2012

  12. [20]

    J., Sánchez, S

    Ibarra-Medel, H. J., Sánchez, S. F., Avila-Reese, V ., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 463, 2799

    2016

  13. [21]

    M., White, S

    Kauffmann, G., Heckman, T. M., White, S. D. M., et al. 2003, MNRAS, 341, 33

    2003

  14. [22]

    Kennicutt, Jr., R. C. 1998, ARA&A, 36, 189

    1998

  15. [23]

    A., et al

    Kreckel, K., Platen, E., Aragón-Calvo, M. A., et al. 2011, AJ, 141, 4

    2011

  16. [24]

    Lacerda, E. A. D., Sánchez, S. F., Mejía-Narváez, A., et al. 2022, New A, 97, 101895

    2022

  17. [25]

    2020, MNRAS, 491, 5747

    Martizzi, D., V ogelsberger, M., Torrey, P., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 491, 5747

    2020

  18. [26]

    M., Moreno, J., White, A., et al

    Moorman, C. M., Moreno, J., White, A., et al. 2016, ApJ, 831, 118

    2016

  19. [27]

    C., Tremonti, C

    Moustakas, J., Kennicutt, Jr., R. C., Tremonti, C. A., et al. 2010, ApJS, 190, 233

    2010

  20. [28]

    2019, Computational Astrophysics and Cosmology, 6, 2

    Nelson, D., Springel, V ., Pillepich, A., et al. 2019, Computational Astrophysics and Cosmology, 6, 2

    2019

  21. [29]

    G., Prada, F., Holtzman, J., Klypin, A., & Betancort-Rijo, J

    Patiri, S. G., Prada, F., Holtzman, J., Klypin, A., & Betancort-Rijo, J. 2006, MN- RAS, 372, 1710 Pérez, E., Cid Fernandes, R., González Delgado, R. M., et al. 2013, ApJ, 764, L1 Pérez, I., Verley, S., Sánchez-Menguiano, L., et al. 2024, A&A, 689, A213

    2006

  22. [30]

    2018, MNRAS, 475, 648

    Pillepich, A., Nelson, D., Hernquist, L., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 475, 648

    2018

  23. [31]

    E., Holwerda, B

    Porter, L. E., Holwerda, B. W., Kruk, S., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 524, 5768

    2023

  24. [32]

    2017, ApJ, 846, L4

    Ricciardelli, E., Cava, A., Varela, J., & Tamone, A. 2017, ApJ, 846, L4

    2017

  25. [33]

    D., Rembold, S

    Riffel, R., Mallmann, N. D., Rembold, S. B., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 524, 5640 Article number, page 10 of 12 Rodríguez-Medrano et al.: Traces of the evolution of void galaxies

    2023

  26. [34]

    & Merchán, M

    Rodriguez, F. & Merchán, M. 2020, A&A, 636, A61 Rodríguez-Medrano, A. M., Paz, D. J., Stasyszyn, F. A., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 521, 916 Rodríguez Medrano, A. M., Paz, D. J., Stasyszyn, F. A., & Ruiz, A. N. 2022, MNRAS, 511, 2688 Rodríguez-Medrano, A. M., Springel, V ., Stasyszyn,...

    2020

  27. [35]

    R., V ogeley, M

    Rojas, R. R., V ogeley, M. S., Hoyle, F., & Brinkmann, J. 2004, ApJ, 617, 50

    2004

  28. [36]

    R., V ogeley, M

    Rojas, R. R., V ogeley, M. S., Hoyle, F., & Brinkmann, J. 2005, ApJ, 624, 571

    2005

  29. [37]

    Rosas-Guevara, Y ., Tissera, P., Lagos, C. d. P., Paillas, E., & Padilla, N. 2022, MNRAS[arXiv:2204.04565]

    2022 arXiv

  30. [38]

    N., Alfaro, I

    Ruiz, A. N., Alfaro, I. G., & Garcia Lambas, D. 2019, MNRAS, 483, 4070

    2019

  31. [39]

    N., Paz, D

    Ruiz, A. N., Paz, D. J., Lares, M., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 448, 1471

    2015

  32. [40]

    & Dall’Agnol De Oliveira, B

    Ruschel-Dutra, D. & Dall’Agnol De Oliveira, B. 2020, danielrd6/ifscube: Modeling,https://zenodo.org/record/4065550, dOI: 10.5281/zen- odo.4065550

    2020

  33. [41]

    2021, MN- RAS, 507, 74 Sánchez, S

    Ruschel-Dutra, D., Storchi-Bergmann, T., Schnorr-Müller, A., et al. 2021, MN- RAS, 507, 74 Sánchez, S. F., Barrera-Ballesteros, J. K., Lacerda, E., et al. 2022, ApJS, 262, 36 Sánchez, S. F., García-Benito, R., González Delgado, R., et al. 2024, Rev. Mex- icana Astron. Astrofis...

    2021

  34. [42]

    2018, MNRAS, 475, 676

    Springel, V ., Pakmor, R., Pillepich, A., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 475, 676

    2018

  35. [43]

    G., Vasei, K., & Lehnert, M

    Tavasoli, S., Rahmani, H., Khosroshahi, H. G., Vasei, K., & Lehnert, M. D. 2015, ApJ, 803, L13

    2015

  36. [44]

    & Cen, R

    Tonnesen, S. & Cen, R. 2015, ApJ, 812, 104 Torres-Ríos, G., Pérez, I., Verley, S., et al. 2024, A&A, 691, A341 van de Weygaert, R. & Platen, E. 2011, in International Journal of Modern Physics Conference Series, V ol. 1, International Journal of Modern Physics Conference Series, 41–66

    2015

  37. [45]

    2016, MNRAS, 463, 3409

    Vazdekis, A., Koleva, M., Ricciardelli, E., Röck, B., & Falcón-Barroso, J. 2016, MNRAS, 463, 3409

    2016

  38. [46]

    2010, MNRAS, 404, 1639 Vázquez-Mata, J

    Vazdekis, A., Sánchez-Blázquez, P., Falcón-Barroso, J., et al. 2010, MNRAS, 404, 1639 Vázquez-Mata, J. A., Hernández-Toledo, H. M., Avila-Reese, V ., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 512, 2222 von Benda-Beckmann, A. M. & Müller, V . 2008, MNRAS, 384, 1189

    2010

  39. [47]

    A., Bundy, K., Diamond-Stanic, A

    Wake, D. A., Bundy, K., Diamond-Stanic, A. M., et al. 2017, AJ, 154, 86

    2017

  40. [48]

    R., et al

    Yan, R., Bundy, K., Law, D. R., et al. 2016, AJ, 152, 197

    2016

  41. [49]

    2019, ApJ, 883, 175

    Yan, R., Chen, Y ., Lazarz, D., et al. 2019, ApJ, 883, 175

    2019

  42. [50]

    G., Adelman, J., Anderson, John E., J., et al

    York, D. G., Adelman, J., Anderson, John E., J., et al. 2000, AJ, 120, 1579 Article number, page 11 of 12 A&A proofs:manuscript no. aa53110-24 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.10 0.12 z 0 10 20 30 40f non-void Void 0 5 10 15 20 Re [arc] 0.000 0.025 0.050 0.075 0.100 0.125 0.150f 20 40 60 80 I...

    2000

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.