Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 34 references

Stability of 2-soliton solutions for the modified Camassa-Holm equation with cubic nonlinearity

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper proves that two-soliton solutions of the modified Camassa-Holm equation are nonlinearly stable: an H^2 perturbation of the momentum remains close to the two-soliton manifold for all times, up to a stated well-posedness assumption.

desk verdict First 2-soliton stability claim for mCH on nonzero background, with a real spectral gap at finite phases and an unproved LWP extension. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.07791 v3 pith:QESH6LJL submitted 2025-06-09 math.AP nlin.SI

Xijun Deng , Stéphane Lafortune , Zhisu Liu This is my paper
classification math.APnlin.SI MSC 35Q5335C0835B3535A15
keywords modifiedCamassa-Holmequationtwo-solitonsolutionsnonlinearstabilitynonzeroconstantbackgroundconservedquantitiesmomentumvariableconstrainedminimizationH2
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper's central claim is that a two-soliton solution of the modified Camassa-Holm equation, sitting on a nonzero constant background, is nonlinearly stable: if the initial momentum profile is close to the two-soliton profile in the Sobolev space $H^{2}$, the evolving solution stays close to the two-soliton manifold, with the two soliton phases allowed to shift in time. The proof works entirely in the momentum variable m, using four conserved integrals to build an action functional whose constrained critical points are exactly the two-soliton profiles. A spectral analysis of the Hessian, together with a count of zeros of a Wronskian associated with the kernel, shows the constrained second-order condition holds, which feeds into a general stability theorem for constrained minimizers. The result matters because it extends the known stability of single solitons for this equation to the interacting two-soliton case, a step toward multi-soliton stability. The paper states, but does not prove, an extension of the local well-posedness theory to nonzero backgrounds; the stability theorem is formulated under that assumption.

What carries the argument

The argument turns on the action functional F(m) = F3(m) + lambda1 F1(m) + lambda2 F2(m), built from three Frechet-differentiable conserved quantities on X_kappa, and on its second variation L = $delta^{2}$ F/delta $m^{2}$, a fourth-order self-adjoint operator evaluated at the two-soliton. The variational characterization fixes lambda1 and lambda2 so that both one-soliton and two-soliton profiles are critical points; the spectral analysis shows L has exactly one negative eigenvalue, with kernel spanned by the phase-derivatives of the two-soliton, by counting zeros of the second-order Wronskian of the two kernel functions in the tau-function variables. Finally the constrained second-order condition is verified by computing the 2x2 Hessian matrix M = $partial^{2}$ F/partial lambda_i partial lambda_j, whose determinant is negative, so it has one positive and one negative eigenvalue, exactly matching L's negativity and triggering the stability conclusion.

What would settle it

Check the assumed well-posedness extension: find initial data m0 in X_kappa, with m0 > 0 and m0 - kappa in $H^{2}$, for which the mCH initial-value problem either loses uniqueness or fails to preserve the sign of m; if such data exist, the stability theorem as stated has no well-posed evolution to govern. Alternatively, a direct numerical simulation of a perturbed two-soliton that shows the $H^{2}$ distance to the two-soliton manifold growing beyond any epsilon would refute the stability claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the nonzero-background phase space X_kappa = {m - kappa in $H^{2}$(R) : m > 0}, and under the stated assumption that the local well-posedness theory extends to nonzero backgrounds, the paper proves that the two-soliton profile tilde(mu)(t, x; c1, c2, y10, y20), with speeds satisfying 3 $kappa^{2}$ < c2 < c1 < 9 $kappa^{2}$, is stable in $H^{2}$: for every epsilon > 0 there is delta > 0 such that an initial datum m0 within $H^{2}$-distance delta of tilde(mu)(0) produces a solution m(t) that, for all times up to its maximal existence time T, lies within $H^{2}$-distance epsilon of tilde(mu)(t) with suitably chosen time-dependent phase parameters y10(t), y20(t). The stability is obtained by showing that the two-soliton is a constrained (non-isolated) minimizer of the functional F(m) = F3(m) + lambda1 F1(m) + lambda2 F2(m), a linear combination of the conserved quantities E1-E4; the Lagrange multipliers lambda1, lambda2 are fixed by the one-soliton variational relations, the Hessian L = $delta^{2}$ F/delta $m^{2}$ is shown to have exactly one negative eigenvalue with kernel spanned by the two translation modes, and the 2x2 matrix of second derivatives of the constraints with respect to the multipliers has exactly one positive eigenvalue, matching the negativity count. The paper treats this as a consequence of a general constrained-minimization stability criterion.

Load-bearing premise

The theorem's content depends on an unproved assumption: that the local well-posedness result for the modified Camassa-Holm equation, stated for zero-background initial data, remains valid on the nonzero-background space X_kappa.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The H^2 closeness to the two-soliton manifold persists for the entire lifespan of the solution; with the additional weighted-space assumptions of Proposition 1.3, the lifespan is infinite.
  • Stability in the momentum variable is equivalent to stability of the velocity profile u = (1 - partial_x^2)^{-1} m in H^4, so the result covers the physical waveform as well.
  • The range of admissible speeds is exactly 3 kappa^2 < c2 < c1 < 9 kappa^2, and the stability estimate is uniform with respect to the two initial phases.
  • Because the argument does not use linear dispersion, the stability is specific to the cubic mCH equation on a nonzero background and is not obtained by taking a zero-dispersion limit of the dispersive model.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the assumed well-posedness extension fails, the theorem would still hold for the weighted, sign-preserving data of Proposition 1.3, where global existence is already available; the result could be re-stated on that smaller class without changing the variational argument.
  • The Wronskian-counting technique for locating the single negative eigenvalue should carry over to other tau-function-represented integrable equations, as long as their conserved integrals can be combined into a Frechet-differentiable action with the right multipliers.
  • A numerical experiment that evolves a perturbed two-soliton and monitors the H^2 distance to the two-soliton manifold is a direct way to see the predicted boundedness; the paper's analysis predicts no dispersive radiation at leading order.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper claims nonlinear stability of 2-soliton solutions of the modified Camassa-Holm equation with cubic nonlinearity on a nonzero constant background, with perturbations measured in H^2 in the momentum variable m. The proof strategy follows the Maddocks-Sachs framework: four conserved quantities are recombined into a Lagrangian; the 2-soliton is characterized as a critical point (Lemma 3.1); the Hessian L is analyzed spectrally (Section 4), with the claim that L has exactly one negative eigenvalue obtained by counting zeros of the Wronskian of the two kernel elements (Proposition 4.1); the constrained second-order condition is then reduced to a two-by-two Hessian matrix M (Lemma 5.1); and Theorem 1.1 is concluded by appealing to results in [25]. The main theorem states that for speeds 3κ^2 < c2 < c1 < 9κ^2, any H^2-close initial momentum remains H^2-close to the 2-soliton family with suitably chosen time-dependent phase shifts on the maximal existence interval.

Significance. If the result is correct, it would be a meaningful advance: it is the first stability theorem for 2-soliton solutions of the mCH equation on a nonzero background, and it extends the one-soliton stability analysis in [3] to the multi-soliton setting using a nontrivial combination of conserved quantities. The paper contains many explicit computations, including the variational characterization, the Hessian computation, and the determinant of the Hessian matrix M, and it avoids parameter fitting: the Lagrange multipliers are uniquely determined from the critical-point equations. The reduction to the Maddocks-Sachs criterion is a natural and potentially powerful approach for this equation. However, the theorem as stated rests on an explicitly acknowledged but unproved extension of local well-posedness to nonzero backgrounds, and the spectral analysis is only carried out in asymptotic regimes for well-separated solitons; these gaps are load-bearing for the claimed stability result.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 1 (Theorem 1.1)] The theorem is stated under an unproved extension of local well-posedness to nonzero backgrounds. Proposition 1.2 applies to u0 in H^s with s > 5/2 and does not cover initial data in X_kappa; Proposition 1.3, the only global result for nonzero backgrounds quoted in the paper, requires m0 - kappa in H^{2,1}(R) ∩ H^{1,2}(R), which is strictly stronger than the H^2 assumption used in Theorem 1.1. Since the stability statement quantifies over all m0 in X_kappa with ||m0 - tilde-mu(0)||_{H^2} < delta and asserts existence of the solution up to maximal time T, the theorem depends on well-posedness that is not established. The authors explicitly acknowledge this in the sentence preceding Theorem 1.1, but for a stated theorem this is a load-bearing premise rather than a harmless technicality; either the extension should be proved, or the theorem should be restricted to a class of initial data for which existence is known.
  2. [Section 4 (Proposition 4.1)] The proof that L has exactly one negative eigenvalue is carried out only in the asymptotic regimes tau >> 1, where the two constituent solitons are well separated and exponentially small terms are discarded. Proposition 4.1, however, is asserted for all finite values of y10, y20 and all admissible speeds, and the stability theorem requires the spectral information at the initial time tau = 0 for arbitrary phase offsets, including strongly overlapping solitons. The Wronskian computation (4.4)-(4.20) does not contain a continuity argument, an exact identity, or any other device that transfers the zero count from the well-separated approximation to the exact Wronskian for finite phases. Consequently, Lemma 4.4 does not yield the claimed one-negative-eigenvalue property, and the constrained second-order condition (5.1) used in Proposition 5.1 is not verified for the initial data covered by Theorem 1.1. This is an internal proof gap, not an externally imposed assumption.
  3. [Section 3 (Lemma 3.1, Step 3)] The exact critical-point identity G(tilde-mu) = 0 is not proved in the manuscript. Step 3 shows, at best, that G(tilde-mu) is a sum of two zero terms plus exponentially small terms and then invokes 'Proposition 3.3 of [20]' to conclude the existence of multipliers for which the variational principle holds. This delegation is insufficient as written: the proposition is not stated, its hypotheses are not checked for the mCH parametrization, and the multipliers lambda1, lambda2 were already fixed in Step 2 from the one-soliton relations. The asymptotic information G(mu_c1) = G(mu_c2) = 0 plus e.s.t. decay does not by itself imply the exact vanishing of G(tilde-mu) unless the cited proposition provides a rigidity argument and is applicable here. This gap is load-bearing because Lemma 3.1 is the variational characterization on which the subsequent stability argument rests.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Lemma 4.2] The displayed formula for L_infinity contains the typo '3 lambda2 lambda^{-5}', which should presumably read '3 lambda2 kappa^{-5}'. The factorization of the constant-coefficient operator should also be checked, as the second factor appears to be missing a factor of kappa^{-7}.
  2. [Proposition 4.1, Case II] Several displayed formulas in Case II use inconsistent variable names, e.g. 'e^{2 xi - psi_1 + 4h}' and '1 + e^{2 xi_2 - psi_2}' where the variable should be xi_1; these typographical errors make the Wronskian computation difficult to verify.
  3. [Remark 1.2] The norm identity is misstated: one should have ||m||_{H^2}^2 = ∫ (1 + ξ^2)^4 |hat u(ξ)|^2 dξ, not ∫ (1 + x^2)^2 |hat u| dx. The intended equivalence between H^2(m) and H^4(u) is correct, but the displayed formula is not.
  4. [Theorem 1.1] The wording 'if for every epsilon > 0 there exists delta...' is grammatically incomplete; it should read 'for every epsilon > 0 there exists delta = delta(epsilon) > 0 such that ...'.
  5. [Lemma 5.1] The computation of F2(mu_c) would benefit from additional detail in the change of variables; as written, some intermediate integrands contain apparent typographical errors, such as the term '-4 sqrt(1-phi) sqrt(1-phi)' in the displayed integrand, which obscures the verification of the final expression for F2(mu_c).

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the 2-soliton stability proof uses conservation laws, an external variational framework, and independently checkable formulas; self-citations are not load-bearing and the main claim does not reduce to its inputs by construction.

full rationale

No circular step is exhibited. The Lagrange multipliers in (3.2) are uniquely determined by solving the two single-soliton critical-point equations (3.17), and the verification of G(µ˜)=0 relies on Proposition 3.3 of [20], an external result, not on Theorem 1.1 itself. The spectral analysis in Proposition 4.1 counts Wronskian zeros via [25, Lemma 2.2], using kernel elements from Lemma 4.3; no parameter is fitted and no stability conclusion is fed back as an input. The only self-citation, [3], supplies the explicit formula F1(µc) used in Lemma 5.1; this is a concrete, externally checkable one-soliton formula, not an unverified uniqueness assertion, and the two-soliton stability does not reduce to the one-soliton result. Two non-circular weaknesses should be flagged separately and weighed as correctness risks. First, before Theorem 1.1 the paper states: "An assumption we make is that Proposition 1.2 can be extended to initial conditions with nonzero background thus for example on Xκ as defined in (1.3)." This makes the theorem conditional on an unproved well-posedness extension. Second, Proposition 4.1 asserts that L has exactly one negative eigenvalue for all finite y10,y20, but the proof computes the Wronskian only in the large-τ asymptotic regions (Cases I, II, III) and then concludes "the Wronskian W(r)(y) changes sign only once"; no continuity or global argument transfers the zero count to strongly overlapping finite phases, leaving the constrained second-order condition (5.1) unsupported in that regime. These are proof gaps and limitations, not circularity, so they do not raise the circularity score.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The proof is built on six external or unproved premises: the extension of local well-posedness to nonzero background, global well-posedness from a preprint, the abstract Maddocks-Sachs framework, the transfer of a variational principle from mKdV, the conservation and differentiability of the higher-order invariants, and time-independence of the Wronskian zero count. None of these are proven in this paper; they are imported from prior work or assumed.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Extension of Proposition 1.2 (local well-posedness with sign preservation) to nonzero background data in X_kappa.
    Stated as an assumption before Theorem 1.1; not proved. The stability statement only has meaning if such well-posedness holds.
  • domain assumption Global well-posedness on the nonzero background from [34, Theorem 1.1] for m(0) - kappa in H^{2,1} cap H^{1,2}, m(0) > 0.
    Used in Remark 1.1 to replace T by infinity; [34] is an arXiv preprint and its assumptions are not verified here.
  • domain assumption The abstract stability theorem of Maddocks-Sachs [25] applies to the mCH equation with the specific functionals and the 2-soliton family, including the phase-independence of the constant C.
    Section 6 reduces the proof entirely to checking the hypotheses and then cites [25, Section 2.3]. The hypotheses are not restated or verified line by line.
  • domain assumption Proposition 3.3 of [20] (a multi-soliton variational principle for mKdV) transfers verbatim to the mCH equation.
    Used in Step 3 of Lemma 3.1 to show G(mu_tilde) = 0 from the criticality of the two one-soliton profiles.
  • domain assumption The conserved quantities E2, E3, E4 from [26] are conserved and Frechet differentiable on X_kappa, and the 2-soliton's asymptotic decoupling into one-solitons is uniform enough to justify computing Fi(mu_tilde) as sums of Fi(mu_cj).
    These are taken from a Backlund transformation paper [26]; only E4 is shown conserved in Appendix A, and only for smooth solutions.
  • domain assumption The number of zeros of the Wronskian computed at large positive time is the same for all finite times.
    Proposition 4.1 computes the Wronskian only for large positive tau and does not prove time-independence of the zero count.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Stability of 2-soliton solutions for the modified Camassa-Holm equation with cubic nonlinearity." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QESH6LJL

@misc{pith2026250607791,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Stability of 2-soliton solutions for the modified Camassa-Holm equation with cubic nonlinearity},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QESH6LJL}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.07791}
}
abstract

In this paper, we are concerned with the stability of 2-soliton solutions on a nonzero constant background for the modified Camassa-Holm equation with cubic nonlinearity. By employing conserved quantities in terms of the momentum variable $m$, we show that the 2-soliton, when regarded as a solution to the initial-value problem for the modified Camassa-Holm equation, is nonlinearly stable to perturbations with respect to the momentum variable in the Sobolev space $H^2$.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

34 extracted references · 34 canonical work pages

  1. [25]

    Maddocks, R

    J. Maddocks, R. Sachs, On the stability of KdV multi-solitons , Commun. Pure Appl. Math. XL VI(1993) 867–901

    work page 1993

  2. [3]

    X. Deng, S. Lafortune, Z. Liu, Orbital stability of smooth solitary waves for the modified Camassa-Holm equation , arXiv:2412.19342v2. 26

    work page arXiv

  3. [20]

    Le Coz, Z

    S. Le Coz, Z. Wang, Stability of the multi-solitons of the modified Korteweg-de Vries equation, Nonlinearity 34 (2020) 7109–7143. 27

    work page 2020

  4. [1]

    P.M. Bies, P. G´ orka, E.G. Reyes, The dual modified Korteweg-de Vries Fokas-Qiao equation: geometry and local analysis. J. Math. Phys.53 (2012) 073710

    work page 2012

  5. [2]

    Constantin, V.S

    A. Constantin, V.S. Gerdjikov, and R.I. Ivanov, Generalized Fourier trans- form for the Camassa–Holm hierarchy , Inverse problems 23 (2007) 1565– 1597

    work page 2007

  6. [4]

    Ehrman, M

    B. Ehrman, M. Johnson, S. Lafortune, Orbital stability of smooth solitary waves for the Novikov equation, J. Nonlinear Sci. 34 (2024) 10098

    work page 2024

  7. [5]

    Fokas, The Korteweg-de Vries equation and beyond, Acta Appl

    A.S. Fokas, The Korteweg-de Vries equation and beyond, Acta Appl. Math. 39 (1995) 295–305

    work page 1995

  8. [6]

    Fokas, On a class of physically important integrable equations, Physica D 87 (1995) 145–150

    A.S. Fokas, On a class of physically important integrable equations, Physica D 87 (1995) 145–150

    work page 1995

Show all 34 references
  1. [7]

    Y. Fu, G. Gui, Y. Liu, C. Qu, On the Cauchy problem for the integrable modified Camassa-Holm equation with cubic nonlinearity, J. Diff. Equ. 255 (2013) 1905–1938

    2013

  2. [8]

    Fuchssteiner, Some tricks from the symmetry-toolbox for nonlinear equa- tions, Physica D 95 (1996) 229–243

    B. Fuchssteiner, Some tricks from the symmetry-toolbox for nonlinear equa- tions, Physica D 95 (1996) 229–243

    1996

  3. [9]

    Greenberg, An oscillation method for fourth order, self-adjoint, two- point boundary value problems with nonlinear eigenvalues, SIAM J

    L. Greenberg, An oscillation method for fourth order, self-adjoint, two- point boundary value problems with nonlinear eigenvalues, SIAM J. Math. Anal. 22 (1991) 1021–1042

    1991

  4. [10]

    G. Gui, Y. Liu, P. Olver, C.Z. Qu, Wave breaking and peakons for a mod- ified Camassa-Holm equation , Comm. Math. Phys. 319 (2013) 731–759

    2013

  5. [11]

    Henry, Geometric Theory of Semilinear Parabolic Equations

    D. Henry, Geometric Theory of Semilinear Parabolic Equations . Springer- Verlag, New York (1981)

    1981

  6. [12]

    Hestenes, Calculus of Variations and Optimal Control Theory, Wiley, New York (1966)

    M.R. Hestenes, Calculus of Variations and Optimal Control Theory, Wiley, New York (1966). (reprint, Krieger 1980)

    1966

  7. [13]

    Hestenes, Optimization Theory, the Finite Dimensional Case , Wiley, New York (1975)

    M.R. Hestenes, Optimization Theory, the Finite Dimensional Case , Wiley, New York (1975). (reprint, Krieger 1980)

    1975

  8. [14]

    Holmer, G

    J. Holmer, G. Perelman, M. Zworski, Effective dynamics of double solitons for perturbed mKdV , Commun. Math. Phys. 305 (1993) 363–425

    1993

  9. [15]

    A.N.W. Hone, S. Lafortune, Stability of stationary solutions for noninte- grable peakon equations , Physica D 263 (2013) 1–14

    2013

  10. [16]

    Ivanov, T

    I. Ivanov, T. Lyons, Dark solitons of the Qiao’s hierarchy , J. Math. Phys. 53 (2012) 123701

    2012

  11. [17]

    Kapitula, On the stability of N -solitons in integrable systems , Nonlin- earity 20 (2007) 879–907

    T. Kapitula, On the stability of N -solitons in integrable systems , Nonlin- earity 20 (2007) 879–907

    2007

  12. [18]

    Lafortune, D.E

    S. Lafortune, D.E. Pelinovsky, Stability of smooth solitary waves in the b-Camassa-Holm equation, Physica D 440 (2022) 133477

    2022

  13. [19]

    Lax, Integrals of nonlinear equations of evolution and solitary waves , Commun

    P. Lax, Integrals of nonlinear equations of evolution and solitary waves , Commun. Pure Appl. Math. XXI (1968) 467–490

    1968

  14. [21]

    J. Li, Y. Liu, Stability of solitary waves for the modified Camassa-Holm equation, Ann. PDE 7 (2021) 14

    2021

  15. [22]

    J. Li, Y. Liu, G. Zhu, Orbital stability of smooth solitons for the modified Camassa-Holm equation, Adv. Math. 454 (2024) 109870

    2024

  16. [23]

    J. Li, Y. Liu, G. Zhu, Stability of 2-soliton solutions in the modified Camassa-Holm equation, Mathematische Annalen 392 (2025) 899–932

    2025

  17. [24]

    Li and H

    J. Li and H. Zhang, Stability of n-solitons for the Camassa-Holm equation , J. Funct. Anal. 289 (2025) 111084

    2025

  18. [26]

    Matsuno, B¨ acklund transformation and smooth multi-soliton solutions for a modified Camassa-Holm equation with cubic nonlinearity , J

    Y. Matsuno, B¨ acklund transformation and smooth multi-soliton solutions for a modified Camassa-Holm equation with cubic nonlinearity , J. Math. Phys. 54 (2013) 051504

    2013

  19. [27]

    Matsuno, Smooth and singular multi-soliton solutions of a modified Camassa-Holm equation with cubic nonlinearity and linear dispersion , J

    Y. Matsuno, Smooth and singular multi-soliton solutions of a modified Camassa-Holm equation with cubic nonlinearity and linear dispersion , J. Phys. A 47 (2014) 125203

    2014

  20. [28]

    Neves, O

    A. Neves, O. Lopes, Orbital stability of double solitons for the Benjamin- Ono equation, Commun. Math. Phys. 262 (2006) 757–791

    2006

  21. [29]

    Olver, P

    P.J. Olver, P. Rosenau, Tri-Hamiltonian duality between solitons and solitary-wave solutions having compact support , Phys. Rev. E 53 (1996) 1900–1906

    1996

  22. [30]

    Qiao, A new integrable equation with cuspons and w/m-shape-peaks solitons, J

    Z. Qiao, A new integrable equation with cuspons and w/m-shape-peaks solitons, J. Math. Phys. 47 (2006) 112701

    2006

  23. [31]

    Z. Qiao, X. Li, An integrable equation with nonsmooth solitons, Theoretical and Mathematical Physics 167 (2011) 584–589

    2011

  24. [32]

    C. Qu, X. Liu, Y. Liu, Stability of peakons for an integrable modified Camassa-Holm equation with cubic nonlinearity , Commun. Math. Phys. 322 (2013) 967–997

    2013

  25. [33]

    Wang and Y

    Z. Wang and Y. Liu, Stability of smooth multi-solitons for the Ca- massa–Holm equation, Calculus of Variations and Partial Differential Equa- tions 61 (2022) 51

    2022

  26. [34]

    Y. Yang, E. Fan, Y. Liu, Existence of global solutions for the modi- fied Camassa-Holm equation with a nonzero background , arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.12711 (2022). 28 Appendix A. Conservation of the functionalE4 In this Appendix, we show explicitly that the quantity E4 given i...

    2022 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.