Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 36 references

Equivariant $K$-theory of cellular toroidal embeddings

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read For every cellular toroidal embedding of a complex reductive group, the equivariant topological K-ring is isomorphic to a tensor product of the K-ring of the wonderful compactification and a ring of piecewise Laurent polynomial functions…

desk verdict Solid extension of the authors' program, but the key toric lemma is asserted without a valid proof, and the completeness hypotheses are missing. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.07867 v2 pith:QRZQIWKG submitted 2025-06-09 math.AG math.KT

Alexis Tchoudjem , V. Uma This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.AGmath.KT MSC 19L4755R9114M2757SXX
keywords equivariantK-theorytoroidalembeddingscellularvarietiesGKMtheorywonderfulcompactificationpiecewiseLaurentpolynomialsBialynicki-Biruladecompositiontoric
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proves a structure theorem for the equivariant topological K-ring of a cellular toroidal embedding $X$ of a complex connected reductive group $G$. It shows that $K^0_{\widetilde{G}_{\mathrm{comp}}\times\widetilde{G}_{\mathrm{comp}}}(X)$ is obtained from the equivariant K-ring of the wonderful compactification of the adjoint group and the K-ring of the toric variety $X_+$ associated to the positive fan, by a tensor product over the representation ring of a maximal torus. The factor $K^0_{T_{\mathrm{comp}}}(X_+)$ is identified with $P LP(F_+)$, the ring of piecewise Laurent polynomial functions on the fan $F_+$. If the paper is correct, the equivariant K-ring of every cellular toroidal embedding is fully determined by the wonderful compactification and the combinatorial fan $F_+$, and the ordinary K-ring follows by forgetting equivariance.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the GKM-type theorem for $T$-cellular varieties (Theorem 4.9): if every $T$-stable curve joining fixed points is a $\mathbb{P}^1$, the number of outgoing curves at each fixed point equals the dimension of the tangent cell, and the acting characters are pairwise linearly independent (Assumption 4.7), then $K^0_{T_{\mathrm{comp}}}(X)$ is exactly the subring $A$ of $R(T_{\mathrm{comp}})^{X^T}$ consisting of tuples satisfying congruence conditions modulo $1-e^{\chi}$ along each $T$-stable curve. For toroidal embeddings, Proposition 7.1 verifies these assumptions using the local isomorphism $U\times U^-\times X_0$ and smoothness of the Bialynicki-Birula cells. Cellularity of $X$ is shown (Theorem 6.4) to be equivalent to cellularity of the associated toric variety $X(F)$, so the fan combinatorics of $F_+$ controls everything. Weyl-group invariants then identify the $G$-equivariant ring via the dot action (Proposition 4.10).

What would settle it

Compute $K^0_{T_{\mathrm{comp}}}(X_+)$ for a cellular toric variety whose fan $F_+$ subdivides the positive Weyl chamber but has a maximal cone $\sigma$ with $\sigma/N_{\tau_i}$ not smooth; if the result is not isomorphic to $P LP(F_+)$ as an $R(T_{\mathrm{comp}})$-algebra, then Theorem 8.3 and the tensor-product description of $K^0(X)$ fail.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central assertion is that for any cellular toroidal embedding $X$ of $G$, the $\widetilde{G}_{\mathrm{comp}}\times\widetilde{G}_{\mathrm{comp}}$-equivariant topological K-ring is isomorphic, as an $R(\widetilde{G}_{\mathrm{comp}})\otimes R(\widetilde{G}_{\mathrm{comp}})$-algebra, to $K^0_{\widetilde{G}_{\mathrm{comp}}\times\widetilde{G}_{\mathrm{comp}}}(G_{\mathrm{ad}})\otimes_{R(\widetilde{T}_{\mathrm{comp}})} K^0_{\widetilde{T}_{\mathrm{comp}}}(X_+)$, where $G_{\mathrm{ad}}$ is the wonderful compactification of the adjoint group and $K^0_{\widetilde{T}_{\mathrm{comp}}}(X_+)\cong P LP(F_+)$. The proof proceeds by a GKM-type description of the $T\times T$-equivariant K-ring as a subring of functions on the $T\times T$-fixed points satisfying congruence conditions along $T\times T$-stable curves, then passes to Weyl-group invariants to recover the $G\times G$-equivariant ring. A direct-sum decomposition with an explicit Steinberg basis gives the module structure, and comparison with the corresponding decomposition for the wonderful compactification yields the tensor-product description. The ordinary K-ring then follows from weak equivariant formality as $K^0(X)\cong K^0(G_{\mathrm{ad}})\otimes_{R(\widetilde{T}_{\mathrm{comp}})} P LP(F_+)$.

Load-bearing premise

The decisive assumption is that the embedding is complete and that the Bialynicki-Birula cells are smooth, which guarantees each $T$-stable curve joining fixed points is a projective line, with exactly the right number of outgoing curves at every fixed point and pairwise independent acting characters.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The equivariant K-ring of every cellular toroidal embedding is explicitly determined by the wonderful compactification and the fan $F_+$; no further geometric input about $X$ is needed.
  • The ordinary topological K-ring is $K^0(X)\cong K^0(G_{\mathrm{ad}})\otimes_{R(\widetilde{T}_{\mathrm{comp}})} P LP(F_+)$, giving a complete computation once the K-ring of the wonderful compactification is known.
  • The $\widetilde{G}_{\mathrm{comp}}\times\widetilde{G}_{\mathrm{comp}}$-equivariant ring is a free module of rank $|W|$ over $K^0_{\widetilde{T}_{\mathrm{comp}}}(X_+)\otimes R(\widetilde{G}_{\mathrm{comp}})$ with an explicit Steinberg basis and closed-form multiplication constants.
  • The results extend earlier descriptions for regular embeddings to singular cellular toroidal embeddings and provide a topological analogue of operational algebraic K-theory descriptions.
  • Cellular toroidal embeddings are weakly equivariantly formal for K-theory, so the forgetful map from equivariant to ordinary K-ring is surjective with kernel controlled by the augmentation ideal.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same GKM framework likely extends to cellular spherical embeddings beyond group compactifications; the only inputs needed are a description of invariant curves and fixed points, so the method is probably portable to other spherical varieties with known fan combinatorics.
  • If the completeness hypothesis is truly unnecessary, the tensor-product formula would extend to partial compactifications of $G$, giving K-rings for non-proper group embeddings; this is a testable extension the paper does not explicitly claim.
  • The piecewise-Laurent-polynomial building block suggests that the equivariant K-ring of a toroidal embedding depends only on the subdivision $F_+$ of the positive Weyl chamber, so two embeddings with the same $F_+$ but differing behavior outside the chamber would have isomorphic equivariant K-rings.
  • One could test the formula numerically on low-rank examples, such as $G=\mathrm{SL}(2)$ or $\mathrm{PGL}(2)$ with small fans, by computing both sides via the GKM description and comparing the tensor-product decomposition.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper studies the eG_comp×eG_comp-equivariant topological K-ring K^0_{eGcomp×eGcomp}(X) of a cellular toroidal embedding X of a complex connected reductive group G. It develops a GKM-type description for complete T-cellular varieties (Theorem 4.9), proves that a toroidal embedding is T×T-cellular if and only if its associated toric variety X is T-cellular (Theorem 6.4), and classifies the T×T-stable curves (Propositions 7.1 and 7.2). The main structural result is Theorem 9.7/Corollary 9.8: K^0_{eGcomp×eGcomp}(X) is isomorphic to K^0_{eGcomp×eGcomp}(G_ad) ⊗_{R(eTcomp)} P LP(F_+), yielding the ordinary K-ring in Theorem 9.9.

Significance. If correct, the paper gives a complete and computable description of the equivariant topological K-ring for a class of possibly singular group embeddings, extending earlier algebraic K-theory results for regular embeddings and providing the topological analogue of Gonzales's operational K-theory. The paper contains complete proofs of the GKM theorem for complete T-cellular varieties and of the invariant-curve classification; these are useful contributions in their own right. However, the central theorem rests on an unproved identification of K^0_{eTcomp}(X_+) with P LP(F_+) for the non-complete toric variety X_+, and on skipped proofs of Theorems 9.5 and 9.6. These gaps need to be repaired before the main claim can be considered established.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 8, Theorem 8.3] The proof of Theorem 8.3 is omitted, and the cited result [34, Theorem 5.6] (Theorem 5.5 of this paper) is stated for a complete T-cellular toric variety. The fan F_+ subdivides the positive Weyl chamber C_+, whose support is a proper cone whenever the root system is nonempty; hence X_+ = X(F_+) is not complete. The freeness and injectivity results that prove the P LP description (Theorems 4.1 and 4.9) are proved in Section 4 under the explicit compactness assumption, not for arbitrary T-cellular varieties. Thus the proof of Theorem 8.3 does not follow from the cited theorem. This is load-bearing: Theorem 1.2, Corollary 9.8, Theorem 9.7, and Theorem 9.9 all use K^0_{eTcomp}(X_+) ≅ P LP(F_+). Please supply a proof for T-cellular toric varieties whose fans have non-complete support, or otherwise justify the reduction.
  2. [Theorems 1.1, 1.2, 9.1, 9.7] The main theorems do not state completeness of X as a hypothesis. Section 4 begins with the sentence "We shall assume that the T-cellular variety X is compact," and Theorem 4.9 is applied to X in Theorem 9.1. If completeness is implicit in the term "toroidal embedding", the convention should be made explicit in the statements; if not, the applications of Theorem 4.9 lack a needed hypothesis. This issue is independent of the non-completeness of X_+, so it should be settled in the statement of the main theorems.
  3. [Section 9.1, Theorems 9.5 and 9.6] The proofs of Theorems 9.5 and 9.6 are skipped, with references to [33, Theorems 2.1 and 2.2] and the phrase "similar arguments". These theorems provide the direct-sum decomposition (9.40) and the multiplication rule (9.41), which are precisely the ring-structure facts needed for the tensor-product algebra isomorphism in Theorem 9.7. Because the present setting replaces algebraic equivariant K-theory by topological equivariant K-theory, allows X to be singular, and would depend on the unproved Theorem 8.3, the reduction to [33] is not a formality. Please give the arguments or a precise verification that the hypotheses of [33] hold here.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Section 6, proof of Proposition 6.3(2)] In the displayed formula for Z_{i,j}, the factor (w_1^{-1},w_1^{-1})·F_j appears, while the following equality uses (w_1^{-1},w_2^{-1})·X_{\nu_0,x_j}; the first appearance is presumably a typo for (w_1^{-1},w_2^{-1})·F_j.
  2. [Sections 2 and 8] For the non-compact space X_+, the notation K^0_{Tcomp}(X_+) is ambiguous: Section 2 defines compactly supported K^0_{Gcomp,c} for non-compact spaces, but later sections omit the subscript c. Please state explicitly whether Theorem 8.3 concerns global or compactly supported equivariant K-theory, and adapt the tensor products in Theorem 9.7 and Corollary 9.8 accordingly.
  3. [Section 8, Theorem 8.3] The assertion that F_+ satisfies [34, Assumption 5.5] is not demonstrated in the text, and that assumption is not reproduced; readers need its exact statement and a verification for the polytopal complex associated to F_+ in order to check the reduction.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No equation-level circularity; the core GKM argument is independent, though several central statements are delegated to the authors' own earlier papers by skipped proofs.

full rationale

The derivation of K0_{eTcomp×eTcomp}(X) in Theorem 9.1 is self-contained: it applies Theorem 4.9, whose proof is given in Section 4.1 using the cell filtration and Thom isomorphisms, to the curve data established in Proposition 7.1 and Proposition 7.2. The passage to eGcomp×eGcomp via W-invariants is Proposition 4.10, proved in the paper. None of these steps is a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction, nor does any defining equation reduce to the target isomorphism. The main theorem's factor K0_{Tcomp}(X+) ≅ P LP(F+) (Theorem 8.3) is, however, not proved in the text: the authors write 'We shall skip the proof of the above theorem which follows exactly along the same lines as that for a complete T-cellular toric variety X=X(Σ) in [34, Theorem 5.6]' and [34] is by one of the authors. Similarly, Theorems 9.5 and 9.6 are asserted with proofs skipped by analogy with [33, Theorems 2.1 and 2.2]. These are load-bearing self-citations and omitted proofs, creating a substantial burden of trust; they are not circular in the equation-level sense, because the cited results are prior published theorems and the present GKM analysis of X is independent. The skeptic's concern that X+ is not complete is a correctness risk about whether [34, Theorem 5.6] applies, not a demonstration that the paper's formula is its own input. Overall: no self-definitional, fitted-input, or renaming circularity; score 2 for the heavy reliance on the authors' own skipped arguments.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

All quantities in the paper are fixed by the geometry of G and the fan F. There are no fitted constants. The paper relies on standard K-theory facts and on imported results from Brion-Kumar, Steinberg, McLeod, Harada-Landweber, and the authors' earlier papers. No new entities are postulated.

assumptions (5)
  • standard math Steinberg basis theorem: R(T_comp) is a free R(G_comp)-module with basis {f_v : v in W}.
    Cited from Steinberg and used in Section 4.2.2 and Theorem 9.5 for the direct sum decomposition.
  • standard math Topological equivariant K-theory facts: Thom isomorphism, localization, and the Kunneth formula of McLeod.
    Used in Section 2, Theorem 4.1, and Proposition 4.10 to prove freeness and the W-invariant description.
  • domain assumption Weak equivariant formality of T-cellular varieties and the Harada-Landweber criterion for compact connected Lie groups with torsion-free fundamental group.
    Used in Theorem 4.14 and Theorem 9.9 to pass from equivariant to ordinary K-theory.
  • domain assumption Properties of toroidal embeddings from Brion-Kumar: existence of p : X to G_ad, the local product structure U x U^- x X_0, and the classification by fans.
    Imported from [8] in Sections 1 and 6; used in Proposition 6.2, Proposition 6.3, and Theorem 9.7.
  • standard math R(T_comp) is a unique factorization domain and elements 1 - e^chi are relatively prime when the characters are linearly independent.
    Used in the proof of Theorem 4.9 to conclude that products of Euler classes divide the GKM data.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Equivariant $K$-theory of cellular toroidal embeddings." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QRZQIWKG

@misc{pith2026250607867,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Equivariant $K$-theory of cellular toroidal embeddings},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QRZQIWKG}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.07867}
}
abstract

In this article we describe the $G_{comp}\times G_{comp}$-equivariant topological $K$-ring of a {\em cellular} toroidal embedding $\mathbb{X}$ of a complex connected reductive algebraic group $G$. In particular, our results extend the results in \cite{u1} and \cite{u2} on the regular embeddings of $G$, to the equivariant topological $K$-ring of a larger class of (possibly singular) cellular toroidal embeddings. They are also a topological analogue of the results in \cite{gon} on the operational equivariant algebraic $K$-ring, for cellular toroidal embeddings.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

36 extracted references · 36 canonical work pages

  1. [33]

    Uma,EquivariantK-theory of group compactifications: further develop- ments, Izv

    V. Uma,EquivariantK-theory of group compactifications: further develop- ments, Izv. Math.80, No. 2, (2016), 417-441

    work page 2016

  2. [1]

    Anderson and S

    D. Anderson and S. Payne,OperationalK-theory, Documenta Math.20 (2015), 357-399

    work page 2015

  3. [2]

    Atiyah, K-Theory, W.A.Benjamin, New York, NY, (1967)

    M.F. Atiyah, K-Theory, W.A.Benjamin, New York, NY, (1967)

    work page 1967

  4. [3]

    Bialynicki-Birula,Some properties of the decompositions of algebraic vari- eties determined by actions of a torus, Bull

    A. Bialynicki-Birula,Some properties of the decompositions of algebraic vari- eties determined by actions of a torus, Bull. Acad. Polon. Sci. S´er. Sci. Math. Astronom. Phys.24(1976), 667-674

    work page 1976

  5. [4]

    De Concini, C

    E.Bifet, C. De Concini, C. Procesi,Cohomology of regular embeddings, Adv. in Math.82(1990), 1-34

    work page 1990

  6. [5]

    Brion,Groupe de Picard et nombrers characteristiques des varietes spheriques, Duke Math

    M. Brion,Groupe de Picard et nombrers characteristiques des varietes spheriques, Duke Math. J.58No. 2 (1989), 397-424

    work page 1989

  7. [6]

    Brion,Equivariant Chow Groups for Torus Actions, Journal of Transfor- mation Groups2(1997), 225-267

    M. Brion,Equivariant Chow Groups for Torus Actions, Journal of Transfor- mation Groups2(1997), 225-267

    work page 1997

  8. [7]

    Brion,The behaviour at infinity of the Bruhat Decomposition, Comment

    M. Brion,The behaviour at infinity of the Bruhat Decomposition, Comment. Math. Helv.73(1998), 137-174

    work page 1998

Show all 36 references
  1. [8]

    Brion and S

    M. Brion and S. Kumar, Frobenius Splitting Methods in Geometry and Rep- resentation Theory,Progress in Mathematics, Birkhauser

  2. [9]

    J. B. Carrell,Torus Actions and Cohomology, Invariant theory and Alge- braic Transformation groups II, Encyclopedia of Mathematical Sciences131 Springer

  3. [10]

    Carrell and R.M

    J.B. Carrell and R.M. Goresky,A Decomposition Theorem for the Integral Homology of a Variety, Invent. Math.73(1983), 367-381

    1983

  4. [11]

    Chriss and V.Ginzburg,Representation theory and complex geometry, Birkhauser (1997)

    N. Chriss and V.Ginzburg,Representation theory and complex geometry, Birkhauser (1997)

    1997

  5. [12]

    De Concini and C

    C. De Concini and C. Procesi, Complete symmetric varieties,Invariant Theory (Proceedings, Montecatini 1982),Lecture Notes in Math.996, 1-44, Springer- Verlag, New York 1983

    1982

  6. [13]

    Fulton,Introduction to toric varieties, Annals of Mathematical Studies 131, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey (1993)

    W. Fulton,Introduction to toric varieties, Annals of Mathematical Studies 131, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey (1993)

    1993

  7. [14]

    Goresky, R

    M. Goresky, R. Kottwitz, R. MacPherson,Equivariant Cohomology, Koszul duality, and the localization theorem.Invent. Math.131, 25-83 (1998)

    1998

  8. [15]

    Gonzales,Localization in equivariant operationalK-theory and the Chang- Skjelbred property, Manuscripta Mathematica,153, No

    R.P. Gonzales,Localization in equivariant operationalK-theory and the Chang- Skjelbred property, Manuscripta Mathematica,153, No. 3 (2017), 623-644

    2017

  9. [16]

    Gubeladze,K-theory of affine toric varieties, Homology, Homotopy Appl.1 (1999), 135-145

    J. Gubeladze,K-theory of affine toric varieties, Homology, Homotopy Appl.1 (1999), 135-145

    1999

  10. [17]

    Landweber,Surjectivity for HamiltonianG- Spaces in K-Theory, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society359 No

    Megumi Harada and Gregory D. Landweber,Surjectivity for HamiltonianG- Spaces in K-Theory, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society359 No. 12 (2007), 6001-6025. 52 A. TCHOUDJEM AND V. UMA

    2007

  11. [18]

    Hausel and B

    T. Hausel and B. Strumfels,Toric Hyperkahler Varieties, Documenta Mathe- matica7(2002), 495-534

    2002

  12. [19]

    Kostant and S

    B. Kostant and S. Kumar,T-equivariantK-theory of generalized flag varieties J. Differential Geom.32(1990),549-603

    1990

  13. [20]

    Iversen,The geometry of algebraic groups, Adv

    B. Iversen,The geometry of algebraic groups, Adv. in Math,20(1976), 57-85

    1976

  14. [21]

    J. P. May, A Concise Course in Algebraic Topology, Chicago Lectures in Math- ematics, The University of Chicago Press (1999)

    1999

  15. [22]

    A. S. Merkurjev,Comparison of the equivariant and the standard K-theory of algebraic varieties, Algebra i Analiz,9, Issue 4, (1997), 175–214

    1997

  16. [23]

    McLeod,The Kunneth formula in equivariantK-theory, inAlgebraic Topol- ogy, Waterloo,1978 (Proc

    J. McLeod,The Kunneth formula in equivariantK-theory, inAlgebraic Topol- ogy, Waterloo,1978 (Proc. Conf. Univ. Waterloo, Waterlo, Ont., 1978), Lec- ture Notes in Mathematics, Vol. 741, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1979, pp. 316- 333

    1978

  17. [24]

    H. V. Pittie,Homogeneous Vector Bundles on Homogeneous Spaces, Topology 111972, 199-203

  18. [25]

    Segal,Equivariant K-theory, Publications math´ ematiques de l’I.H

    G. Segal,Equivariant K-theory, Publications math´ ematiques de l’I.H. ´E.S., tome 34 (1968), p. 129-151

    1968

  19. [26]

    Steinberg,On a theorem of Pittie, Topology,14:2 (1975), 173-177

    R. Steinberg,On a theorem of Pittie, Topology,14:2 (1975), 173-177

    1975

  20. [27]

    R. W. Thomason,Algebraic K -theory of group scheme actions, pp. 539–563 in Algebraic topology and algebraic K -theory (Princeton,NJ,1983), edited by W.Browder, Ann. of Math. Stud. 113, Princeton Univ. Press, 1987

    1983

  21. [28]

    New York 1987

    Tammo tom Dieck, Transformation Groups, De Gruyter Studies in Mathemat- ics, Walter de Gruyter Berlin. New York 1987

    1987

  22. [29]

    Tchoudjem,Cohomologie des fibr´ es en droites sur les compactifications des groupes r´ eductifs, Ann

    A. Tchoudjem,Cohomologie des fibr´ es en droites sur les compactifications des groupes r´ eductifs, Ann. Scient. Ec. Norm. Sup., 4e, t. 37, 2004, p.415 ` a 448

    2004

  23. [30]

    Timashev,Homogeneous spaces and equivariant embeddings, Encyclopedia of Mathematical Sciences,138, Invariant theory and Algebraic Transformation Groups, 8

    D. Timashev,Homogeneous spaces and equivariant embeddings, Encyclopedia of Mathematical Sciences,138, Invariant theory and Algebraic Transformation Groups, 8. Springer, Heidelberg, 2011

    2011

  24. [31]

    J. S. Tymoczko,Permutation Actions on Equivariant Cohomology, Contem- porary Mathematics460, American Mathematical Society, (2008)

    2008

  25. [32]

    Uma,EquivariantK-theory of compactifications of algebraic groups, Trans- formation groups12, No

    V. Uma,EquivariantK-theory of compactifications of algebraic groups, Trans- formation groups12, No. 2, (2007), 371-406

    2007

  26. [34]

    Uma,EquivariantK-theory of cellular toric varieties, Fundamenta Mathe- maticae,269, (2025), 71-97

    V. Uma,EquivariantK-theory of cellular toric varieties, Fundamenta Mathe- maticae,269, (2025), 71-97

    2025

  27. [35]

    Uma,EquivariantK-theory of cellular toric bundles and related spaces, math arXiv:2409.05719v3

    V. Uma,EquivariantK-theory of cellular toric bundles and related spaces, math arXiv:2409.05719v3

    arXiv

  28. [36]

    Vezzosi and A

    G. Vezzosi and A. Vistoli,Higher algebraicK-theory for actions of diagonal- izable groups. Invent. Math.153(2003), no.1, 1-44. EQUIV ARIANTK-THEORY OF CELLULAR TOROIDAL EMBEDDINGS 53 Institut Camille Jordan Universit ´e Lyon 1 43, boulevard du ONZE NOVEMBRE 69622 Villeurbanne ...

    2003

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.