Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 49 references

Double Low-Rank 4D Tensor Decomposition for Circular RIS-Aided mmWave MIMO-NOMA System Channel Estimation in Mobility Scenarios

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Double low-rank 4D tensor decomposition estimates RIS-aided mmWave channel parameters closest to the Cramér-Rao bound down to -20 dB SNR.

desk verdict The tensor formulation and the training-slot independence argument are fresh, but the paper's headline low-SNR advantage over the prior circular RIS method is never actually tested against it. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.07909 v1 pith:PGNDSV3W submitted 2025-06-09 eess.SP

Wanyuan Cai , Xiaoping Jin , Youming Li , Menglei Sheng , Mingjun Huang , Qinke Qi , Qiang Guo This is my paper
classification eess.SP
keywords channelestimationcircularRISdoublelow-rank4DtensordecompositionADMMmmWaveMIMO-NOMADopplershiftCramér-Raobound
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to establish that channel estimation for a circular-RIS-aided mmWave MIMO-NOMA downlink with a moving user can be solved by arranging the received pilot signal as a fourth-order tensor and decomposing it with a double low-rank model. The model combines a Tucker term that captures the tensor's global low-rank structure with a structured CP term that exploits the Vandermonde structure of the Doppler factor, and it adds a sparse component for the tail of the Gaussian noise. The claimed payoff is that the four factor matrices are restored more accurately than by methods relying on a single low-rank structure, with the largest gain at low signal-to-noise ratios. If the claim holds, the same angle, delay, Doppler, and gain estimates that drive beamforming can also serve positioning and integrated sensing, because the circular-RIS geometry plus the Jacobi-Anger expansion decouples all angles without extra hardware. Simulations show the proposed parameter MSEs closest to the Cramér-Rao bound down to $-20$ dB SNR, while comparison methods degrade.

What carries the argument

The central object is the DLR4DTD objective of Eq. (23): minimize $\|\mathbf{Y}-\mathbf{Z}-\mathbf{S}\|_F^2 + \mu_1\|\mathbf{Z}\|_{\mathrm{SCPD}} + \mu_2\|\mathbf{S}\|_1$ subject to $\mathbf{Z}=\mathbf{G}\times_1\mathbf{U}_1\times_2\mathbf{U}_2\times_3\mathbf{U}_3\times_4\mathbf{U}_4$ with orthogonal factors. The Tucker constraint enforces the global low-rank property and is updated inside ADMM by the higher-order orthogonal iteration (HOOI) algorithm. The structured-CPD subproblem enforces the local low-rank property: spatial smoothing on the mode-1 unfolding of the intermediate tensor exposes the Vandermonde Doppler factor through an eigendecomposition of $\mathbf{U}_{s1}^{\dagger}\mathbf{U}_{s2}$, recovering all four factor matrices without initialization or iteration over the CP fit. Around this core, the subframe-partitioning scheme organizes the received pilot signals into the fourth-order tensor of Eq. (21), and the Jacobi-Anger expansion $\mathbf{a}_r(\theta_{eq},\phi_{eq})\approx\boldsymbol{\Theta}\mathbf{J}_d(\theta_{eq})\mathbf{v}(\phi_{eq})$ splits the circular-RIS angles into a diagonal matrix depending on $\theta_{eq}$ and a vector depending on $\phi_{eq}$, which is what allows the angles to be uniquely decoupled.

What would settle it

Run the same simulator with noise altered so its tail is not sparse—for example Gaussian noise with the largest outliers clipped, or uniform dense noise—and check around $-15$ dB SNR whether DLR4DTD still beats the single-structure benchmark; if the margin collapses, the sparse-tail model is the load-bearing part of the low-SNR claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the noiseless received signal is modeled as a rank-$L$ canonical polyadic tensor whose four factor matrices separate the parameter groups: $\mathbf{A}$ for the BS and mobile angles, $\mathbf{B}$ for the circular-RIS angles, $\mathbf{C}$ for delay and gain, and $\mathbf{D}$ for Doppler. The proposed DLR4DTD algorithm recovers these factors by solving a nonconvex model that couples a fit term, a structured-CPD regularizer, and an $\ell^1$ sparse-noise penalty, with the low-rank signal constrained to a Tucker form. An ADMM loop alternates a higher-order orthogonal iteration step for global denoising, a structured-CPD step that uses spatial smoothing and an eigendecomposition for local factor recovery, a soft-thresholding step for the sparse noise tail, and a multiplier update. The paper's core assertion is that this double low-rank structure suppresses noise and restores factor matrices accurately enough that, at SNR down to $-20$ dB, the MSE of $\phi_{BR}$, $\theta_{RM}$, $\theta_{BR}$, $\phi_{RM}$, $\tau$, $f_d$, and $\rho$ sits closest to the derived Cramér-Rao bound among the tested estimators, and the cascade-channel NMSE falls roughly exponentially with SNR.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the heavy tail of measurement noise can be separated as a sparse layer by the sparse-noise penalty; if real noise tails are not sparse in the tensor sense, the low-SNR advantage over the single-structure benchmark disappears.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Angle parameters are uniquely decoupled: $\phi_{BR}$ and $\theta_{RM}$ are read from factor matrix $\mathbf{A}$ by a two-stage rough search plus simplex refinement, while $\theta_{BR}$ and $\phi_{RM}$ are read from $\mathbf{B}$ via spectral search and simplex refinement; linear RIS topologies cannot provide this decoupling.
  • The number of RIS training time slots is independent of the circular-RIS radius, so the scheme avoids the small element spacings, mutual coupling, and manufacturing problems of the earlier circular-RIS training pattern.
  • All four factor matrices share one permutation matrix, so the per-path channel parameters are automatically paired, and the time delay, Doppler shift, and cascade gain are estimated without ambiguity; the cascade delay can be decoupled into physical positions once $L\geq 2$.
  • In simulation, the proposed method keeps every estimated parameter MSE closest to the Cramér-Rao bound down to $-20$ dB SNR, with cascade-channel NMSE decreasing roughly exponentially in SNR, and the ADMM objective converges in few iterations regardless of initialization.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Our inference: the sparse-noise-tail layer is a generic plug-in. Any tensor-based channel estimator facing Gaussian noise at low SNR could adopt the same soft-thresholding update with a cross-validated weight, independent of the circular-RIS geometry.
  • Our inference: the reconstructed factor matrices carry both communication and positioning parameters, so the low-SNR estimation gain should propagate directly into RIS-aided localization and integrated sensing; feeding the estimated angles, delays, and Doppler shifts into position equations is a natural next test.
  • Our inference: the radius-independence property, if it holds at larger radii and element counts, opens a design direction the paper does not explore—enlarging the circular RIS to reduce mutual coupling without paying additional training slots.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a channel estimation method for a circular RIS-aided mmWave MIMO-NOMA downlink system in mobility. The received signal is modeled as a fourth-order tensor with a canonical polyadic decomposition (CPD) structure, separating angle, delay, Doppler, and gain parameters into factor matrices. The proposed DLR4DTD method jointly exploits a global Tucker low-rank model and a local structured CPD (called 4DSTDCE), adds an ell-1 regularized sparse component believed to capture the tail of Gaussian noise, and solves the resulting nonconvex problem via ADMM. A two-stage parameter estimation based on the Jacobi-Anger expansion of the circular RIS is used for angle decoupling, and a closed-form Cramér-Rao bound is derived by vectorizing the received signal. Simulations compare DLR4DTD against CP-ALS-QR and the paper's own 4DSTDCE subroutine, reporting MSE/NMSE versus SNR and convergence behavior.

Significance. If the reported gains hold, the paper would make a useful contribution to RIS-aided channel estimation by combining global and local low-rank structure with sparse outlier modeling, and by providing a CRB benchmark for the circular-RIS setting. The manuscript contains a mostly coherent tensor model, a fairly complete parameter estimation pipeline, and a self-contained CRB derivation in Appendix A, which is a notable strength. However, the central low-SNR advantage rests on a modeling assumption about Gaussian noise tails that is not justified, and the numerical evaluation does not include the existing circular-RIS method [25] that motivates the work, so the main comparative claim is not yet established.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section V, Fig. 3] The numerical comparison does not include the circular-RIS channel estimation method of [25], which is the state-of-the-art approach the paper explicitly aims to overcome (Section I). The only baselines are CP-ALS-QR [23] and 4DSTDCE, and 4DSTDCE is the paper's own subroutine introduced in Algorithm 1 and used inside DLR4DTD. The comparison therefore demonstrates an ablation gain over a component of the proposed method, not an advantage over existing circular-RIS estimators. To support the central claim of improved estimation accuracy for circular-RIS systems, the authors should simulate [25] (or justify its exclusion with a concrete reason, e.g., unavailability of code) and discuss how the proposed training-slot design compares in accuracy and complexity.
  2. [Section III.A, Eq. (23)] The low-SNR improvement of DLR4DTD relies on the assumption, stated in Section III.A and formalized in Eq. (23), that 'the tail of the noise exhibits strong intensity and sparsity' and can therefore be modeled as an additive sparse component S penalized by mu_2 ||S||_1. This assumption is load-bearing: Figs. 3(a)-3(h) attribute the advantage at SNR = -15 dB and below to the separation of S. However, Gaussian noise does not have a sparse tail in the usual sense, and the paper provides neither a statistical justification nor a robustness test against non-sparse or non-Gaussian noise. There is also a risk that the ell-1 penalty absorbs signal energy rather than only noise. The authors should either justify this model with a concrete statistical argument, add experiments with standard Gaussian noise where the sparse component is disabled, or demonstrate that the result is insensitive to the choice of mu_2 and to the sparsity model.
  3. [Section V, Fig. 3 and Fig. 5] The simulation section states that 'all the simulation results are averaged over independent Monte Carlo trials' but does not report the number of trials or any error bars or confidence intervals. Given that the key claims are about relative performance at low SNR, where the plotted differences can be small (e.g., Fig. 3(a) at SNR near 10 dB), single-mean curves without variance information are insufficient to establish that DLR4DTD outperforms 4DSTDCE. Additionally, Fig. 5 has no legend or curve identification, and the caption does not explain which metric is plotted, making the velocity-robustness claim unverifiable. The authors should report trial counts, include error bars or shaded intervals, and clarify Fig. 5.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section VI and Appendix A] Typographical issues: 'Jacobi-Angler expansion' in the conclusion should be 'Jacobi-Anger expansion', and the Appendix title 'DEVIATION OF CRB' should be 'DERIVATION OF CRB'.
  2. [Section V, Eq. (62)] The NMSE definition in Eq. (62) is inconsistent: the denominator uses N M and the outer sum runs over m=1..M and n=1..N, but the norm inside the sum depends on k and m, not on n. The summation index should be k over the pilot subcarriers (or K should replace N consistently).
  3. [Algorithm 2 and Section V] Algorithm 2 states fixed parameter values mu_1 = 0.01 and mu_2 = 0.5, while Section V says these parameters are chosen by cross-validation. Please clarify whether the listed values are defaults or the outcome of cross-validation, and report the cross-validated values used in the figures.
  4. [Eq. (24) and Eq. (29)] The formulation in Eq. (24) introduces an auxiliary variable R and the constraint Z = R, yet the objective already contains both ||Y-Z-S||_F^2 and mu_1 ||Y-R-S||_F^2; this is not wrong but is redundant and makes the derivation harder to follow. A brief explanation of why both terms are retained would improve readability.
  5. [Section V, Fig. 3(a)] The caption of Fig. 3(a) reads 'MSE of phi_BR', but the text in Section V discusses 'theta_BR' in the corresponding paragraph; please check that the subfigure labels match the parameter discussed in the text.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No material circularity: only a minor, non-load-bearing self-citation; derivation is self-contained.

  1. other [Section I, Introduction, sentence citing Ref. [9]]
    "In [9], the subspace-based CPD method is proposed to resolve these problems by exploiting the Vandermonde structure behind the received signal and only uses basic linear algebra, avoiding initialization and iteration."

    Ref. [9] has overlapping authors with the present paper (M. Sheng, Y. Li, W. Cai, and Q. Qi are co-authors here), so this is a self-citation. However, this sentence is background motivation for subspace-based CPD and user localization; the DLR4DTD derivation does not rest on [9]. The structured-CPD subroutine in Algorithm 1 is explicitly motivated by the external Ref. [24] ('motivated by the structured CPD method proposed in [24]'), and the low-SNR claim is supported by the ADMM solution of Eq. (23). Thus this is a minor self-citation with no load-bearing role and no reduction of a prediction to an input.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. The received signal is modeled as a CPD tensor in Eqs. (20)-(22), and the DLR4DTD objective (23) is posed directly on that tensor, with ADMM updates (26)-(50) solving the stated objective; the CRB in Section IV and Appendix A is derived from the model via the complex Fisher information matrix, not fitted to simulation curves. The low-SNR advantage rests on the explicit modeling assumption that the tail of Gaussian noise is sparse (Section III.A, Eq. (23)), which is an assumption about the noise, not a circular reduction. The numerical comparison against 4DSTDCE (Algorithm 1) is an ablation against a component of the proposed method, and the absence of a comparison with [25] is a scope/evidence gap; neither makes the derivation circular. The only flagged item is the self-citation [9], which is motivational and not load-bearing. Score 2 reflects that minor self-citation; no prediction reduces to an input by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard mmWave channel assumptions, a known tensor CPD model, and an ad hoc sparse-noise assumption. The main free parameters are the regularization weights mu_1 and mu_2, the Tucker rank set to L, and the Jacobi-Anger truncation order. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (5)
  • mu_1 (Tucker fidelity weight) = 0.01
    Set in Algorithm 2 and chosen by cross-validation in Section V; controls the balance between the global Tucker fit and the structured CPD fit in Eq. (23).
  • mu_2 (sparse noise weight) = 0.5
    Set in Algorithm 2 and cross-validated in Section V; controls the strength of the ell-1 penalty on the sparse noise term S in Eq. (23).
  • Tucker rank r1 = r2 = r3 = r4 = L (assumed number of paths)
    The global low-rank Tucker model in Algorithm 2 fixes the rank to the assumed number of propagation paths L; L is treated as known rather than estimated.
  • Jacobi-Anger truncation order I = 2 times ceil(2 pi r / lambda)
    The infinite Jacobi-Anger series in Eq. (15) is truncated at an order chosen by the authors for higher precision; this controls the accuracy of the angle decoupling approximation.
  • ADMM penalty gamma and tolerances = gamma = 1.5; eps1 = eps2 = eps3 = 1e-5; kmax = 300
    Numerical hyperparameters of the ADMM solver in Algorithm 2; they are not derived from the model and the convergence of the nonconvex problem is not proven.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption BS-RIS channel is LoS-dominated and quasi-static with a single path
    Eq. (1) models G[tau] as a single tap; the paper argues BS and RIS are at high locations with limited local scattering. If this fails, the CPD model in Eq. (21) is misspecified.
  • domain assumption RIS-MS channel parameters remain constant within an aggregated slot
    Section II.A justifies this via numerology with 480 kHz subcarrier spacing and 90 km/h motion giving 0.3125 cm movement per slot; the Doppler model in Eq. (7) relies on this.
  • ad hoc to paper The tail of Gaussian noise is sparse
    Section III.A introduces the sparse noise variable S in Eq. (23) with the statement that noise tails exhibit strong intensity and sparsity; no distributional or empirical justification is given.
  • standard math The received noise-free tensor has exact CPD of rank L with identifiable factor matrices
    Eq. (22) assumes the tensor admits CPD form; uniqueness is invoked from [46] without proving that the conditions hold for the circular RIS parameters.
  • domain assumption Pilot symbols X and RIS phase shift matrix Xi are known at the receiver
    Eqs. (18)-(19) treat X and Xi as known pilot and configuration matrices; any pilot estimation error is ignored.
  • ad hoc to paper Jacobi-Anger truncation error is negligible with I = 2 times ceil(2 pi r / lambda)
    Eq. (15) truncates the infinite expansion; the order is set by the authors rather than derived from a required error bound.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Double Low-Rank 4D Tensor Decomposition for Circular RIS-Aided mmWave MIMO-NOMA System Channel Estimation in Mobility Scenarios." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/PGNDSV3W

@misc{pith2026250607909,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Double Low-Rank 4D Tensor Decomposition for Circular RIS-Aided mmWave MIMO-NOMA System Channel Estimation in Mobility Scenarios},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/PGNDSV3W}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.07909}
}
read the original abstract

Channel estimation is not only essential to highly reliable data transmission and massive device access but also an important component of the integrated sensing and communication (ISAC) in the sixth-generation (6G) mobile communication systems. In this paper, we consider a downlink channel estimation problem for circular reconfigurable intelligent surface (RIS)-aided millimeter-wave (mmWave) multiple-input multiple-output non-orthogonal multiple access (MIMO-NOMA) system in mobility scenarios. First, we propose a subframe partitioning scheme to facilitate the modeling of the received signal as a fourth-order tensor satisfying a canonical polyadic decomposition (CPD) form, thereby formulating the channel estimation problem as tensor decomposition and parameter extraction problems. Then, by exploiting both the global and local low-rank properties of the received signal, we propose a double low-rank 4D tensor decomposition model to decompose the received signal into four factor matrices, which is efficiently solved via alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM). Subsequently, we propose a two-stage parameter estimation method based on the Jacobi-Anger expansion and the special structure of circular RIS to uniquely decouple the angle parameters. Furthermore, the time delay, Doppler shift, and channel gain parameters can also be estimated without ambiguities, and their estimation accuracy can be efficiently improved, especially at low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Finally, a concise closed-form expression for the Cram\'er-Rao bound (CRB) is derived as a performance benchmark. Numerical experiments are conducted to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method compared with the other discussed methods.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.07909 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The mobile stations (MSs) transmit large amounts of data at high transmission rates while moving, such as extensive real-time road and MS status information collected by diverse sensors. Due to the obstruction of buildings, the direct (i.e. LoS) path between base station (BS) and MSs are blocked. Thus, a circular RIS is introduced to provide extra paths for communication. To strike a balanced trade-off between syste… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Subframe partitioning scheme. In mobility scenarios, a faster moving velocity will intro￾duce a higher Doppler frequency shift, causing rapid mmWave channel fluctuations within a short period of time. Owing to the numerology definition of the subcarrier spacing (SCS) and wide frequency band of the mmWave system, a larger SCS can be set to achieve shorter symbol duration time [40]. According to the technical specific… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Comparison of channel estimation performance versus [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: shows the objective function values of the proposed method versus iteration times under different SNR. It can be observed from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Comparison of estimation performance versus velocity. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 33 canonical work pages

  1. [25]

    Circular RIS-enabled channel estimation and localization for multi-user ISAC systems,

    Y . Lin, S. Jin, M. Matthaiou, and X. Yi, “Circular RIS-enabled channel estimation and localization for multi-user ISAC systems,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 23, no. 8, pp. 8730–8743, 2024

    work page 2024

  2. [46]

    On the uniqueness of multilinear decomposition of N-way arrays,

    N. D. Sidiropoulos and R. Bro, “On the uniqueness of multilinear decomposition of N-way arrays,”J. Chemom., vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 229– 239, 2000

    work page 2000

  3. [23]

    CP decomposition for tensors via alternating least squares with QR decomposition,

    R. Minster, I. Viviano, X. Liu, and G. Ballard, “CP decomposition for tensors via alternating least squares with QR decomposition,”Numer . Linear Algebra Appl., vol. 30, no. 6, p. e2511, 2023

    work page 2023

  4. [1]

    On the road to 6G: Visions, requirements, key technologies, and testbeds,

    C.-X. Wang, X. You, X. Gao, X. Zhu, Z. Li, C. Zhang, H. Wang, Y . Huang, Y . Chen, H. Haas, J. S. Thompson, E. G. Larsson, M. D. Renzo, W. Tong, P. Zhu, X. Shen, H. V . Poor, and L. Hanzo, “On the road to 6G: Visions, requirements, key technologies, and testbeds,”IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts., vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 905–974, 2023

    2023

  5. [2]

    Active fully- connected RIS based on index modulation for high rate and energy- efficient systems,

    J. Jin, X. Jin, M. Wen, M. Song, C. Huang, and Y . Yao, “Active fully- connected RIS based on index modulation for high rate and energy- efficient systems,”IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 72, no. 12, pp. 7639– 7649, 2024

    work page 2024

  6. [3]

    Evolution of NOMA toward next generation multiple access (NGMA) for 6G,

    Y . Liu, S. Zhang, X. Mu, Z. Ding, R. Schober, N. Al-Dhahir, E. Hossain, and X. Shen, “Evolution of NOMA toward next generation multiple access (NGMA) for 6G,”IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 1037–1071, 2022

    2022

  7. [4]

    An overview of signal processing techniques for RIS/IRS-aided wireless systems,

    C. Pan, G. Zhou, K. Zhi, S. Hong, T. Wu, Y . Pan, H. Ren, M. D. Renzo, A. Lee Swindlehurst, R. Zhang, and A. Y . Zhang, “An overview of signal processing techniques for RIS/IRS-aided wireless systems,”IEEE J. Sel. Topics Signal Process., vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 883–917, 2022. VOL. XX, NO. X, MONTH 2025 13

    work page 2022

  8. [5]

    Integrated sensing and communication with reconfigurable intelligent surfaces: Opportunities, applications, and future directions,

    R. Liu, M. Li, H. Luo, Q. Liu, and A. L. Swindlehurst, “Integrated sensing and communication with reconfigurable intelligent surfaces: Opportunities, applications, and future directions,”IEEE Wireless Com- mun., vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 50–57, 2023

    work page 2023

Show all 49 references
  1. [6]

    Rectangular differential reflecting spatial modulation: A noncoherent joint index-modulation of RIS-assisted MIMO system,

    P. Zhang, X. Jin, C. Wan, S. Xing, C. Huang, M. Wen, and Y . Yao, “Rectangular differential reflecting spatial modulation: A noncoherent joint index-modulation of RIS-assisted MIMO system,”IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 72, no. 12, pp. 7387–7400, 2024

    2024

  2. [7]

    Wireless communications with reconfigurable intelligent surface: Path loss modeling and experimental measurement,

    W. Tang, M. Z. Chen, X. Chen, J. Y . Dai, Y . Han, M. Di Renzo, Y . Zeng, S. Jin, Q. Cheng, and T. J. Cui, “Wireless communications with reconfigurable intelligent surface: Path loss modeling and experimental measurement,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 421– ...

    2021

  3. [8]

    Channel estimation and user localization for IRS-assisted MIMO-OFDM systems,

    Y . Lin, S. Jin, M. Matthaiou, and X. You, “Channel estimation and user localization for IRS-assisted MIMO-OFDM systems,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 2320–2335, 2022

    2022

  4. [9]

    User localization for reconfigurable intelligent surface-assisted mmWave MIMO-OFDM systems,

    M. Sheng, Y . Li, W. Cai, Q. Qi, Z. Wu, and Y . Wu, “User localization for reconfigurable intelligent surface-assisted mmWave MIMO-OFDM systems,”IEEE Commun. Lett., pp. 1–5, 2024

    2024

  5. [10]

    Tensor decomposition-based channel estimation for hybrid mmWave massive MIMO in high-mobility scenarios,

    R. Zhang, L. Cheng, S. Wang, Y . Lou, W. Wu, and D. W. K. Ng, “Tensor decomposition-based channel estimation for hybrid mmWave massive MIMO in high-mobility scenarios,”IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 70, no. 9, pp. 6325–6340, 2022

    2022

  6. [11]

    TRICE: A channel estimation framework for RIS-aided millimeter-wave MIMO systems,

    K. Ardah, S. Gherekhloo, A. L. F. de Almeida, and M. Haardt, “TRICE: A channel estimation framework for RIS-aided millimeter-wave MIMO systems,”IEEE Signal Process. Lett., vol. 28, pp. 513–517, 2021

    2021

  7. [12]

    Efficient two-level block-structured sparse Bayesian learning-based channel estimation for RIS-assisted MIMO IoT systems,

    J. Chen, N. Ma, X. Xu, X. Qin, Y . Li, and P. Zhang, “Efficient two-level block-structured sparse Bayesian learning-based channel estimation for RIS-assisted MIMO IoT systems,”IEEE Internet Things J., vol. 11, no. 14, pp. 24 933–24 947, 2024

    2024

  8. [13]

    Exploiting structured sparsity with low complexity sparse Bayesian learning for RIS-assisted MIMO mmWave channel estimation,

    W. Li, Z. Lin, Q. Guo, and B. Vucetic, “Exploiting structured sparsity with low complexity sparse Bayesian learning for RIS-assisted MIMO mmWave channel estimation,”IEEE Trans. V eh. Technol., vol. 73, no. 5, pp. 6752–6764, 2024

    2024

  9. [14]

    Channel estimation for RIS-aided mmWave MIMO systems via atomic norm minimization,

    J. He, H. Wymeersch, and M. Juntti, “Channel estimation for RIS-aided mmWave MIMO systems via atomic norm minimization,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 20, no. 9, pp. 5786–5797, 2021

    2021

  10. [15]

    Location-aware beam training and multi- dimensional ANM-based channel estimation for RIS-aided mmwave systems,

    H. Chung and S. Kim, “Location-aware beam training and multi- dimensional ANM-based channel estimation for RIS-aided mmwave systems,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 652–666, 2024

    2024

  11. [16]

    Channel estimation for RIS- aided MIMO systems: A partially decoupled atomic norm minimization approach,

    Y . Chu, Z. Wei, Z. Yang, and D. W. K. Ng, “Channel estimation for RIS- aided MIMO systems: A partially decoupled atomic norm minimization approach,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., pp. 1–1, 2024

    2024

  12. [17]

    ADMM based channel estimation for RISs aided millimeter wave communications,

    H. Liu, J. Zhang, Q. Wu, H. Xiao, and B. Ai, “ADMM based channel estimation for RISs aided millimeter wave communications,”IEEE Commun. Lett., vol. 25, no. 9, pp. 2894–2898, 2021

    2021

  13. [18]

    Machine learning with tree tensor networks, CP rank constraints, and tensor dropout,

    H. Chen and T. Barthel, “Machine learning with tree tensor networks, CP rank constraints, and tensor dropout,”IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., vol. 46, no. 12, pp. 7825–7832, 2024

    2024

  14. [19]

    Hyperspectral image denoising with total variation regularization and nonlocal low-rank tensor decom- position,

    H. Zhang, L. Liu, W. He, and L. Zhang, “Hyperspectral image denoising with total variation regularization and nonlocal low-rank tensor decom- position,”IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., vol. 58, no. 5, pp. 3071– 3084, 2020

    2020

  15. [20]

    Channel estimation for intelligent reflecting surface assisted MIMO systems: A tensor modeling approach,

    G. T. de Ara ´ujo, A. L. F. de Almeida, and R. Boyer, “Channel estimation for intelligent reflecting surface assisted MIMO systems: A tensor modeling approach,”IEEE J. Sel. Topics Signal Process., vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 789–802, 2021

    2021

  16. [21]

    Time-varying phase noise estimation, channel estimation, and data detection in RIS-assisted MIMO systems via tensor analysis,

    J. Du, Y . Cheng, L. Jin, and F. Gao, “Time-varying phase noise estimation, channel estimation, and data detection in RIS-assisted MIMO systems via tensor analysis,”IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 71, pp. 3426–3441, 2023

    2023

  17. [22]

    Compressed CPD-based channel estimation and joint beamforming for RIS-assisted millimeter wave communications,

    X. Zheng, J. Fang, H. Wang, P. Wang, and H. Li, “Compressed CPD-based channel estimation and joint beamforming for RIS-assisted millimeter wave communications,”IEEE Trans. V eh. Technol., pp. 1–13, 2024

    2024

  18. [24]

    Time- varying channel estimation scheme for uplink MU-MIMO in 6G sys- tems,

    J. Wang, W. Zhang, Y . Chen, Z. Liu, J. Sun, and C.-X. Wang, “Time- varying channel estimation scheme for uplink MU-MIMO in 6G sys- tems,”IEEE Trans. V eh. Technol., vol. 71, no. 11, pp. 11 820–11 831, 2022

    2022

  19. [26]

    Conformal IRS-empowered MIMO-OFDM: Channel estimation and environment mapping,

    Y . Lin, S. Jin, M. Matthaiou, and X. You, “Conformal IRS-empowered MIMO-OFDM: Channel estimation and environment mapping,”IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 70, no. 7, pp. 4884–4899, 2022

    2022

  20. [27]

    Pattern analysis of uniform circular array,

    K.-L. Du, “Pattern analysis of uniform circular array,”IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 1125–1129, 2004

    2004

  21. [28]

    Uniform circular arrays for smart anten- nas,

    P. Ioannides and C. Balanis, “Uniform circular arrays for smart anten- nas,”IEEE Antennas Propag. Mag., vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 192–206, 2005

    2005

  22. [29]

    On the impact of mutual coupling on RIS-assisted channel estimation,

    P. Zheng, X. Ma, and T. Y . Al-Naffouri, “On the impact of mutual coupling on RIS-assisted channel estimation,”IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 1275–1279, 2024

    2024

  23. [30]

    Sparse Bayesian learning for the time-varying massive MIMO channels: Acquisition and tracking,

    J. Ma, S. Zhang, H. Li, F. Gao, and S. Jin, “Sparse Bayesian learning for the time-varying massive MIMO channels: Acquisition and tracking,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 1925–1938, 2019

    1925

  24. [31]

    Tensor-based joint channel estimation and symbol detection for time-varying mmWave massive MIMO systems,

    J. Du, M. Han, Y . Chen, L. Jin, and F. Gao, “Tensor-based joint channel estimation and symbol detection for time-varying mmWave massive MIMO systems,”IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 69, pp. 6251–6266, 2021

    2021

  25. [32]

    Tensor decomposition- aided time-varying channel estimation for millimeter wave MIMO systems,

    L. Cheng, G. Yue, X. Xiong, Y . Liang, and S. Li, “Tensor decomposition- aided time-varying channel estimation for millimeter wave MIMO systems,”IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 1216–1219, 2019

    2019

  26. [33]

    Estimating doubly-selective chan- nels for hybrid mmWave massive MIMO systems: A doubly-sparse approach,

    S. Gao, X. Cheng, and L. Yang, “Estimating doubly-selective chan- nels for hybrid mmWave massive MIMO systems: A doubly-sparse approach,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 19, no. 9, pp. 5703– 5715, 2020

    2020

  27. [34]

    Sparse, group-sparse, and online Bayesian learning aided channel estimation for doubly-selective mmWave hybrid MIMO OFDM systems,

    S. Srivastava, C. S. K. Patro, A. K. Jagannatham, and L. Hanzo, “Sparse, group-sparse, and online Bayesian learning aided channel estimation for doubly-selective mmWave hybrid MIMO OFDM systems,”IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 69, no. 9, pp. 5843–5858, 2021

    2021

  28. [35]

    Estimation of dispersive high-Doppler channels in the RIS-aided mmWave internet of vehicles,

    J. Chen, W. Shen, S. Luo, S. Ma, C. Xing, and L. Hanzo, “Estimation of dispersive high-Doppler channels in the RIS-aided mmWave internet of vehicles,”IEEE Internet Things J., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 677–691, 2024

    2024

  29. [36]

    Low- rank tensor decomposition-aided channel estimation for millimeter wave MIMO-OFDM systems,

    Z. Zhou, J. Fang, L. Yang, H. Li, Z. Chen, and R. S. Blum, “Low- rank tensor decomposition-aided channel estimation for millimeter wave MIMO-OFDM systems,”IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 35, no. 7, pp. 1524–1538, 2017

    2017

  30. [37]

    Channel estimation and hybrid precoding for millimeter wave cellular systems,

    A. Alkhateeb, O. El Ayach, G. Leus, and R. W. Heath, “Channel estimation and hybrid precoding for millimeter wave cellular systems,” IEEE J. Sel. Topics Signal Process., vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 831–846, 2014

    2014

  31. [38]

    Tensor-based channel esti- mation for millimeter wave MIMO-OFDM with dual-wideband effects,

    Y . Lin, S. Jin, M. Matthaiou, and X. You, “Tensor-based channel esti- mation for millimeter wave MIMO-OFDM with dual-wideband effects,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 68, no. 7, pp. 4218–4232, 2020

    2020

  32. [39]

    An overview of signal processing techniques for millimeter wave MIMO systems,

    R. W. Heath, N. Gonz ´alez-Prelcic, S. Rangan, W. Roh, and A. M. Sayeed, “An overview of signal processing techniques for millimeter wave MIMO systems,”IEEE J. Sel. Topics Signal Process., vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 436–453, 2016

    2016

  33. [40]

    5G; NR; Physical channels and modulation; (3GPP TS 38.211 version 18.2.0 Release 18),

    3GPP, “5G; NR; Physical channels and modulation; (3GPP TS 38.211 version 18.2.0 Release 18),” 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP), Technical Specification (TS), May 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi ts/138200 138299/138211/ 18.02.00 60/ts 13821...

    2024

  34. [41]

    Abramowitz and I

    M. Abramowitz and I. A. Stegun,Handbook of mathematical functions with formulas, graphs, and mathematical tables. US Government printing office, 1968, vol. 55

    1968

  35. [42]

    Super-resolution channel estimation for arbitrary arrays in hybrid millimeter-wave mas- sive MIMO systems,

    Y . Wang, Y . Zhang, Z. Tian, G. Leus, and G. Zhang, “Super-resolution channel estimation for arbitrary arrays in hybrid millimeter-wave mas- sive MIMO systems,”IEEE J. Sel. Topics Signal Process., vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 947–960, 2019

    2019

  36. [43]

    Tensor decompositions and applications,

    T. G. Kolda and B. W. Bader, “Tensor decompositions and applications,” SIAM Rev., vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 455–500, 2009

    2009

  37. [44]

    D. P. Bertsekas,Constrained optimization and Lagrange multiplier methods. Academic press, 2014

    2014

  38. [45]

    Tensor-based channel estimation and itera- tive refinements for two-way relaying with multiple antennas and spatial reuse,

    F. Roemer and M. Haardt, “Tensor-based channel estimation and itera- tive refinements for two-way relaying with multiple antennas and spatial reuse,”IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 58, no. 11, pp. 5720–5735, 2010

    2010

  39. [47]

    A simplex method for function minimiza- tion,

    J. A. Nelder and R. Mead, “A simplex method for function minimiza- tion,”Comput. J., vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 308–313, 1965

    1965

  40. [48]

    Conver- gence properties of the Nelder–Mead simplex method in low dimen- sions,

    J. C. Lagarias, J. A. Reeds, M. H. Wright, and P. E. Wright, “Conver- gence properties of the Nelder–Mead simplex method in low dimen- sions,”SIAM J. Optim., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 112–147, 1998

    1998

  41. [49]

    S. M. Kay,Fundamentals of statistical signal processing: estimation theory. Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1993

    1993

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.