Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Experimental demonstration of attosecond hard X-ray pulses

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper reports the first direct experimental confirmation that hard X-ray free-electron lasers can generate isolated attosecond pulses, measured via amplified spontaneous emission from a copper target.

desk verdict A real measurement advance for attosecond hard X-rays, but the duration claim leans on an unvalidated model at sub-fs pump lengths. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.07968 v1 pith:SW2OEQ33 submitted 2025-06-09 physics.optics physics.acc-ph

Ichiro Inoue , River Robles , Aliaksei Halavanau , Veronica Guo , Thomas M. Linker Andrei Benediktovitch , Stasis Chuchurka , Matthew H. Seaberg , Yanwen Sun
show 19 more authors
Diling Zhu David Cesar Yuantao Ding Vincent Esposito Paris Franz Nicholas S. Sudar Zhen Zhang Taito Osaka Gota Yamaguchi Yasuhisa Sano Kazuto Yamauchi Jumpei Yamada Uwe Bergmann Matthias F. Kling Claudio Pellegrini Makina Yabashi Nina Rohringer Takahiro Sato Agostino Marinelli
This is my paper
classification physics.opticsphysics.acc-ph
keywords attosecondpulseshardX-rayfree-electronlaseramplifiedspontaneousemissionpulsedurationdiagnosticsMaxwell-Blochsimulationtransform-limitedcopperK-shellfluorescenceradiationdamage
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports the first direct experimental confirmation that hard X-ray free-electron laser pulses can be made a few hundred attoseconds long, with the shortest pulses near the transform limit. The method uses a nonlinear process, amplified spontaneous emission from a copper foil, as a shot-by-shot clock: the number of stimulated Kα1 photons emitted when a focused 9.05 keV pulse hits the foil depends steeply on the pulse’s peak intensity and therefore on its duration. By matching the measured photon yield to three-dimensional Maxwell-Bloch simulations for 100 as, 400 as, and 1 fs pump pulses, the authors infer that most high-energy pulses fall between the 100 as and 400 as curves, indicating attosecond durations with pulse-to-pulse fluctuations. A rough threshold estimate independently puts the duration near 300 as, and the bandwidth–duration product for the shortest pulses is about 2 fs·eV, close to the transform limit. If correct, this extends attosecond techniques to photon energies about an order of magnitude higher than previous soft X-ray work, enabling experiments that watch electronic motion with atomic spatial resolution.

What carries the argument

The diagnostic is amplified spontaneous emission (ASE) from a 20-µm copper foil: a tightly focused hard X-ray pump creates a population inversion between the copper 2p and 1s levels, and spontaneously emitted Kα1 photons are amplified along the pump direction, producing a nonlinear signal that can reach $10^{8}$ photons. Because the ASE yield depends on the pump’s peak intensity and on its duration relative to the 400-as copper core-hole lifetime, matching the measured yield to three-dimensional Maxwell-Bloch simulations with stochastic emission terms yields the pulse duration. On the generation side, the pulse is produced by photocathode laser shaping, which forms a sub-femtosecond current spike in the electron bunch, followed by a linear undulator taper that compensates the strong energy chirp inside the spike.

What would settle it

Run the same 9.05 keV pulses through a target whose core-hole lifetime is much shorter than 100 as, for example a higher-Z element pumped at its L-shell edge, and compare the inferred durations with the copper results. Agreement would confirm the Maxwell-Bloch extrapolation; disagreement would show that the sub-100-as part of the model is wrong. Alternatively, a direct time-domain measurement of the same pulses, such as infrared streaking of photoelectrons, would settle whether the true duration lies in the 100–400 as range.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the free-electron laser, operated with photocathode-laser shaping and a linear undulator taper, generates isolated hard X-ray pulses at 9.05 keV with durations of roughly 100–400 as, and that these durations can be read out shot-by-shot from the yield of amplified spontaneous emission in a copper target. The evidence is a measured ASE signal that, for pulse energies above about 2 µJ, sits between the simulated curves for 100 as and 400 as pump pulses and clearly above the 1 fs curve, while the threshold pulse energy for ASE, about 1.5 µJ in a 150 nm focus, is consistent with roughly 300 as pulses. Because the single-shot spectra are single Gaussian peaks with 15–35 eV bandwidths, a 100 as pulse corresponds to a bandwidth–duration product of about 2 fs·eV, near the transform limit. The authors also find that multi-spike pulses produce little or no ASE, consistent with their lower peak intensity at equal pulse energy.

Load-bearing premise

The duration inference assumes that the Maxwell-Bloch simulations predict the absolute ASE yield for sub-femtosecond pump pulses as accurately as they do for the femtosecond pulses on which the model was validated, including the transient population-inversion dynamics when the pump is shorter than the 400-as copper core-hole lifetime.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Hard X-ray free-electron lasers can now produce and directly verify isolated attosecond pulses, raising the photon-energy reach of attosecond science to around 9 keV.
  • The ASE signal can be recorded on a shot-by-shot basis without destroying the X-ray pulse, so it can be used to group data by pulse duration or to train non-destructive estimators from accelerator parameters.
  • Nearly transform-limited 100 as, 9 keV pulses with microjoule energies and 10^19 W/cm^2 focused intensities should allow pump–probe studies of electron dynamics with atomic spatial resolution.
  • Pulses shorter than the few-femtosecond onset of secondary electronic damage open a route to single-shot diffraction and spectroscopy before radiation damage alters the sample.
  • Using targets with shorter core-hole lifetimes than copper, such as L-shell holes in higher-Z elements, the same technique could extend timing diagnostics to pulses of a few tens of attoseconds.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the Maxwell-Bloch absolute yield calibration carries over to other transition metals, the same ASE approach could be retuned to different photon energies and durations by choosing a target whose core-hole lifetime matches the expected pulse length.
  • A natural cross-check, not pursued in the paper, would be to compare ASE-inferred durations with an independent time-domain measurement, such as streaking of photoelectrons by an infrared field, once such a method reaches hard X-ray energies.
  • The Gaussian single-peak assumption in the simulations is only indirectly supported; if some pulses contained weak satellite sub-pulses, the ASE yield would be biased toward overestimating the main-peak duration, so a second diagnostic would make the duration claim more robust.
  • Because ASE depends on peak intensity, the same dataset could be re-analyzed with a Bayesian inversion to produce a full duration distribution rather than a comparison with three discrete curves.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports generation and characterization of attosecond hard X-ray pulses at the Linac Coherent Light Source using the photocathode laser shaping technique. The diagnostic is based on amplified spontaneous emission (ASE) from a 20-µm copper foil pumped by 9.05 keV X-ray pulses focused to 150 nm. By comparing the measured number of Kα1 ASE photons per pulse with three-dimensional Maxwell-Bloch simulations for Gaussian pump pulses of 100 as, 400 as, and 1 fs, the authors infer that most single-spike pulses have durations between 100 as and 400 as, with shot-to-shot fluctuations, and that the 100-as pulses are nearly transform-limited. The paper also proposes ASE as a general temporal diagnostic for hard X-ray attosecond pulses and discusses its sensitivity limit set by the core-hole lifetime.

Significance. If the inference is correct, this is the first direct experimental evidence of attosecond pulse generation in the hard X-ray regime, extending attosecond technology by about an order of magnitude in photon energy. The proposed ASE-based diagnostic is intrinsically single-shot and nonlinear, with detected photon numbers up to 10^8, which could make it a practical tool for characterizing and potentially feedback-optimizing attosecond hard X-ray FEL pulses. The authors present a forward-model comparison with no fitted free parameters, supported by start-to-end electron beam and FEL simulations, and they explicitly identify the core-hole-lifetime limit of the technique. These are genuine strengths. However, the central duration assignment depends on the absolute accuracy of the Maxwell-Bloch model in a regime where it has not been independently calibrated, and the experimental evidence is presented mainly as binned averages without full shot-level statistics.

major comments (3)
  1. [Discussion, Fig. 3] The central claim that pulse durations are 100–400 as rests on the absolute yield predicted by the Maxwell-Bloch model for sub-femtosecond pump pulses. The model has been validated against ASE experiments with femtosecond pulses (ref. [32], 7 fs) and related stimulated X-ray emission experiments, but in the regime where the pump duration is comparable to or shorter than the 400-as K-shell core-hole lifetime, the population inversion and gain evolve during the pump pulse itself. No independent experimental calibration exists in this regime. The paper should provide a sensitivity analysis (e.g., variations in the core-hole lifetime, dipole matrix element, dephasing time, the assumed 150-nm Gaussian spot size, and the pump temporal profile) and, if possible, a validation point at sub-femtosecond durations. Without this, a systematic error of even a factor of two in the simulated gain would move the inferred durations outside the claimed 100–400 as range.
  2. [Fig. 3 and Methods] The shaded bands around the simulated curves represent Poisson counting statistics of the detected photons only; they do not include any uncertainty on the simulated yield itself. In addition, the experimental data are shown as binned averages with standard deviations, but the number of pulses in each energy bin is not stated. The key sentence that “the measured ASE signal for most pulses is between the simulation results for 100 as and 400 as” cannot be verified from the binned averages alone, especially because only about 6.5% of all pulses were classified as single-spike. Please report the number of pulses per bin, the per-pulse detected yields (or an equivalent scatter plot), and a quantified systematic uncertainty on the simulated curves.
  3. [Abstract and Discussion] The phrase “direct experimental confirmation” is stronger than what the measurement provides. The pulse duration is not measured directly in the time domain; it is inferred by comparing a nonlinear yield with a forward model. Unlike angular streaking in the soft X-ray regime, this is a model-based inference. I recommend tempering the wording to “strong evidence” or “model-based confirmation” unless the sub-femtosecond calibration of the ASE model is independently established.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Introduction, first paragraph] There is a typo in “eletron beam current”; it should be “electron beam current.”
  2. [Fig. 1 caption and Methods] “XTCA V” should be written as “XTCAV” (X-band transverse deflecting cavity) consistently throughout the text and figure captions.
  3. [References] Reference [35] is cited as “accepted in Nature:2409.06914 [physics.optics]”; if the paper has been formally accepted, the reference should be updated to the full journal citation.
  4. [Results, threshold estimate] The threshold-based estimate of ~300 as should explicitly state that it uses the 7-fs threshold intensity without correcting for the core-hole-lifetime effect and should therefore be treated only as a rough consistency check, not as an independent confirmation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the attosecond duration claim is inferred by comparing measured ASE yields to an independently published forward model, not by fitting the model to the target data.

full rationale

The central inference — that the hard X-ray pulses are 100–400 as long — rests on comparing the measured absolute number of Kα1 ASE photons to simulated curves in Fig. 3 for Gaussian pump pulses of 100 as, 400 as, and 1 fs. These simulated curves are forward-model predictions from a 3D Maxwell-Bloch solver whose formalism is published in prior peer-reviewed work by the same group and others [36, 37, 44]. The model is not fitted to the data being interpreted: no parameter is adjusted to make the measured yields match the 100–400 as window. The atomic parameters (e.g., core-hole lifetime, dipole moments) are taken from the literature [45, 46], and the model has been validated against an independent femtosecond-pump ASE experiment, as the paper notes when using the previously determined threshold intensity of 2×10^19 W/cm2 for 7-fs pulses [32]. The rough threshold estimate of ~300 as is explicitly approximate and is not the basis of the central claim; it is a definitional rearrangement of intensity = energy/(duration × area) using a prior measured threshold. The Gaussian single-peak temporal profile assumption is supported by selection of spectra with R^2 > 0.995 and by independent start-to-end electron-beam and FEL simulations; even if that assumption were imperfect, it would be a model limitation rather than circularity because the ASE yield comparison still provides an independent constraint on duration conditional on the model. The paper's self-citations to its own Maxwell-Bloch methodology are normal and not load-bearing in a circular way: they point to derived formalisms with stated assumptions, not to an assertion of the present result, and the model is externally falsifiable through earlier ASE experiments. The main scientific risk — extrapolation of the absolute ASE-yield model from femtosecond to sub-femtosecond pump durations — is a question of model validation and sensitivity, not a circular reduction of the prediction to its inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on no newly fitted parameters. Inputs are measured (pulse energy, spot size) or taken from literature (core-hole lifetime, atomic data). The main postulates are the Gaussian temporal profile and the validity of the Maxwell-Bloch model at attosecond timescales. No new entities are introduced.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The temporal profile of the pump pulse is a single Gaussian without satellite peaks.
    Assumed in the ASE simulations; supported by measured single-Gaussian spectra and start-to-end beam dynamics simulations, but not directly measured at the attosecond timescale.
  • domain assumption The 3D Maxwell-Bloch model accurately simulates ASE for pump durations comparable to the core-hole lifetime.
    The model is validated against experiments with femtosecond pulses (refs 31,32); extrapolation to 100-as pulses is not independently confirmed.
  • domain assumption The Cu K-shell core-hole lifetime is approximately 400 as.
    Taken from refs 45,46; affects the sensitivity of the diagnostic and the interpretation of the simulated ASE yields.
  • domain assumption The threshold intensity for ASE from copper is the same for attosecond pulses as for 7-fs pulses.
    Used only for the rough duration estimate in the Results; the authors acknowledge the approximation, and the main result does not depend on this assumption.
  • domain assumption The start-to-end electron beam simulations (Astra, Elegant, Genesis) accurately model the generation of the attosecond current spike and the FEL process.
    Used to support the feasibility of 100-as pulses and the Gaussian assumption; not an experimental measurement.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Experimental demonstration of attosecond hard X-ray pulses." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SW2OEQ33

@misc{pith2026250607968,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Experimental demonstration of attosecond hard X-ray pulses},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SW2OEQ33}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.07968}
}
abstract

We present the first direct experimental confirmation of attosecond pulse generation in the hard X-ray regime with a free-electron laser. Our experiment is based on measurements of a nonlinear optical phenomenon known as amplified spontaneous emission (ASE) from 3d transition metals. By analyzing the yield of the collective X-ray fluorescence induced by ultrashort pulses at the Linac Coherent Light Source, we identify the generation of attosecond pulses and shot-to-shot fluctuations in their duration, ranging from 100 as to 400 as. The observed product of bandwidth and pulse duration for 100 as pulses is approximately 2 fs$\cdot$eV, indicating the generation of nearly transform-limited pulses. Our results extend the photon energy reach of attosecond techniques by one order of magnitude, providing the ability to simultaneously probe matter on the time-scales of electronic phenomena and with atomic spatial resolution. Furthermore, attosecond hard X-ray pulses can outrun the fastest radiation damage processes, paving the way to single-shot damage-free X-ray measurements.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.07968 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Schematics (not to scale) of the experiment. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Amplified spontaneous emission from 20- [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Comparison between measured and simulated num [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Peak undulator [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Simulated electron beam longitudinal phase space at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Spectral-angular and transverse intensity distribu [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Expected number of detected [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_8.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Electronic Damage Suppression in X-ray Diffraction with Attosecond X-ray Pulses

    physics.optics 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Attosecond x-ray pulses keep transient electronic excitation below the level needed for valence-charge-density mapping, whereas femtosecond pulses do not.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

58 extracted references · 47 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [32]

    Yoneda et.al., Atomic inner-shell laser at 1.5- ˚ angstr¨ om wavelength pumped by an x-ray free-electron laser, Na- ture524, 446 (2015)

    H. Yoneda et.al., Atomic inner-shell laser at 1.5- ˚ angstr¨ om wavelength pumped by an x-ray free-electron laser, Na- ture524, 446 (2015)

    work page 2015

  2. [1]

    Krausz and M

    F. Krausz and M. Ivanov, Attosecond physics, Rev. Mod. Phys.81, 163 (2009)

    2009

  3. [2]

    P. B. Corkum, Plasma perspective on strong field multi- photon ionization, Phys. Rev. Lett.71, 1994 (1993)

    1993

  4. [3]

    Hentschel, R

    M. Hentschel, R. Kienberger, C. Spielmann, G. A. Rei- der, N. Milosevic, T. Brabec, P. Corkum, U. Heinzmann, M. Drescher, and F. Krausz, Attosecond metrology, Na- ture414, 509 (2001)

    2001

  5. [4]

    P. M. Paul, E. S. Toma, P. Breger, G. Mullot, F. Aug´ e, P. Balcou, H. G. Muller, and P. Agostini, Observation of a train of attosecond pulses from high harmonic generation, Science292, 1689 (2001)

    2001

  6. [5]

    Duris, S

    J. Duris, S. Li, T. Driver, E. G. Champenois, J. P. MacArthur, A. A. Lutman, Z. Zhang, P. Rosenberger, J. W. Aldrich, R. Coffee, G. Coslovich, F.-J. Decker, J. M. Glownia, G. Hartmann, W. Helml, A. Kamalov, J. Knurr, J. Krzywinski, M.-F. Lin, J. P. Marangos, M. Nantel, A. Natan, J. T. O’Neal, N. Shivaram, P. Wal- ter, A. L. Wang, J. J. Welch, T. J. A. Wol...

    work page 2020

  7. [6]

    Huang and K.-J

    Z. Huang and K.-J. Kim, Review of x-ray free-electron laser theory, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams10, 034801 (2007)

    work page 2007

  8. [7]

    Pellegrini, A

    C. Pellegrini, A. Marinelli, and S. Reiche, The physics of x-ray free-electron lasers, Rev. Mod. Phys.88, 015006 (2016)

    2016

Show all 58 references
  1. [8]

    Bonifacio, L

    R. Bonifacio, L. De Salvo, P. Pierini, N. Piovella, and C. Pellegrini, Spectrum, temporal structure, and fluctua- tions in a high-gain free-electron laser starting from noise, Phys. Rev. Lett.73, 70 (1994)

    1994

  2. [9]

    Zhang, J

    Z. Zhang, J. Duris, J. P. MacArthur, A. Zholents, Z. Huang, and A. Marinelli, Experimental demonstra- tion of enhanced self-amplified spontaneous emission by photocathode temporal shaping and self-compression in a magnetic wiggler, New Journal of Physics22, 083030 (2020)

    2020

  3. [10]

    E. Prat, A. Malyzhenkov, C. Arrell, P. Craievich, S. Reiche, T. Schietinger, and G. Wang, Coherent sub- 8 femtosecond soft x-ray free-electron laser pulses with nonlinear compression, APL Photonics8, 111302 (2023)

    2023

  4. [11]

    beam ` a la carte

    S. Li, Z. Zhang, S. Alverson, D. Cesar, T. Driver, P. Franz, E. Isele, J. P. Duris, K. Larsen, M.-F. Lin, R. Obaid, J. T. O’Neal, R. Robles, N. Sudar, Z. Guo, S. Vetter, P. Walter, A. L. Wang, J. Xu, S. Carbajo, J. P. Cryan, and A. Marinelli, “beam ` a la carte”: Laser heater ...

    2024

  5. [12]

    Franz, S

    P. Franz, S. Li, T. Driver, R. R. Robles, D. Cesar, E. Isele, Z. Guo, J. Wang, J. P. Duris, K. Larsen, J. M. Glownia, X. Cheng, M. C. Hoffmann, X. Li, M.-F. Lin, A. Ka- malov, R. Obaid, A. Summers, N. Sudar, E. Thierstein, Z. Zhang, M. F. Kling, Z. Huang, J. P. Cryan, and A. M...

    2024

  6. [13]

    Z. Guo, T. Driver, S. Beauvarlet, D. Cesar, J. Duris, P. L. Franz, O. Alexander, D. Bohler, C. Bostedt, V. Averbukh, X. Cheng, L. F. DiMauro, G. Doumy, R. Forbes, O. Gessner, J. M. Glownia, E. Isele, A. Ka- malov, K. A. Larsen, S. Li, X. Li, M.-F. Lin, G. A. Mc- Cracken, R. Ob...

    2024

  7. [14]

    J. P. Duris, J. P. MacArthur, J. M. Glownia, S. Li, S. Vet- ter, A. Miahnahri, R. Coffee, P. Hering, A. Fry, M. E. Welch,et al., Controllable x-ray pulse trains from en- hanced self-amplified spontaneous emission, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 104802 (2021)

    2021

  8. [15]

    R. R. Robles, K. A. Larsen, D. Cesar, T. Driver, J. Duris, P. Franz, D. Garratt, V. Guo, G. Just, R. Lemons,et al., Spectrotemporal shaping of attosecond x-ray pulses with a fresh-slice free-electron laser, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 115001 (2025)

    2025

  9. [16]

    J. T. O’Neal, E. G. Champenois, S. Oberli, R. Obaid, A. Al-Haddad, J. Barnard, N. Berrah, R. Coffee, J. Duris, G. Galinis, D. Garratt, J. M. Glownia, D. Haxton, P. Ho, S. Li, X. Li, J. MacArthur, J. P. Marangos, A. Natan, N. Shivaram, D. S. Slaughter, P. Walter, S. Wandel, L. ...

    2020

  10. [17]

    Driver, M

    T. Driver, M. Mountney, J. Wang, L. Ortmann, A. Al- Haddad, N. Berrah, C. Bostedt, E. G. Champenois, L. F. DiMauro, J. Duris, D. Garratt, J. M. Glownia, Z. Guo, D. Haxton, E. Isele, I. Ivanov, J. Ji, A. Kamalov, S. Li, M.-F. Lin, J. P. Marangos, R. Obaid, J. T. O’Neal, P. Rose...

    2024

  11. [18]

    Alexander, F

    O. Alexander, F. Egun, L. Rego, A. M. Gutierrez, D. Garratt, G. A. C´ ardenas, J. J. Nogueira, J. P. Lee, K. Zhao, R.-P. Wang, D. Ayuso, J. C. T. Barnard, S. Beauvarlet, P. H. Bucksbaum, D. Cesar, R. Coffee, J. Duris, L. J. Frasinski, N. Huse, K. M. Kowalczyk, K. A. Larsen, M....

    2024

  12. [19]

    S. Li, L. Lu, S. Bhattacharyya, C. Pearce, K. Li, E. T. Nienhuis, G. Doumy, S. Moeller, M.-F. Lin,et al., Attosecond-pump attosecond-probe x-ray spectroscopy of liquid water, Science383, 1118 (2024)

    2024

  13. [20]

    Marinelli, J

    A. Marinelli, J. MacArthur, P. Emma, M. Guetg, C. Field, D. Kharakh, A. A. Lutman, Y. Ding, and Z. Huang, Experimental demonstration of a single-spike hard-x-ray free-electron laser starting from noise, Appl. Phys. Lett.111, 151101 (2017)

    2017

  14. [21]

    Huang, Y

    S. Huang, Y. Ding, Y. Feng, E. Hemsing, Z. Huang, J. Krzywinski, A. A. Lutman, A. Marinelli, T. J. Maxwell, and D. Zhu, Generating single-spike hard x-ray pulses with nonlinear bunch compression in free-electron lasers, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 154801 (2017)

    2017

  15. [22]

    Malyzhenkov, Y

    A. Malyzhenkov, Y. P. Arbelo, P. Craievich, P. Dijk- stal, E. Ferrari, S. Reiche, T. Schietinger, P. Jurani´ c, and E. Prat, Single-and two-color attosecond hard x-ray free- electron laser pulses with nonlinear compression, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 042018 (2020)

    2020

  16. [23]

    J. Yan, W. Qin, Y. Chen, W. Decking, P. Dijkstal, M. Guetg, I. Inoue, N. Kujala, S. Liu, T. Long, N. Mirian, and G. Geloni, Terawatt-attosecond hard x-ray free- electron laser at high repetition rate, Nature Photon.18, 1293 (2024)

    2024

  17. [24]

    Hartmann, G

    N. Hartmann, G. Hartmann, R. Heider, M. S. Wag- ner, M. Ilchen, J. Buck, A. O. Lindahl, C. Benko, J. Gr¨ unert, J. Krzywinski, J. Liu, A. A. Lutman, A. Marinelli, T. Maxwell, A. A. Miahnahri, S. P. Moeller, M. Planas, J. Robinson, A. K. Kazansky, N. M. Kabach- nik, J. Viefhaus...

    2018

  18. [25]

    S. Li, Z. Guo, R. N. Coffee, K. Hegazy, Z. Huang, A. Natan, T. Osipov, D. Ray, A. Marinelli, and J. P. Cryan, Characterizing isolated attosecond pulses with angular streaking, Opt. Express26, 4531 (2018)

    2018

  19. [26]

    Inubushi, K

    Y. Inubushi, K. Tono, T. Togashi, T. Sato, T. Hat- sui, T. Kameshima, K. Togawa, T. Hara, T. Tanaka, H. Tanaka, T. Ishikawa, and M. Yabashi, Determination of the pulse duration of an x-ray free electron laser using highly resolved single-shot spectra, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 1448...

    2012

  20. [27]

    P. Krejciket al., Sub-fs Resolution with the Enhanced Operation of the X-band Transverse Deflecting Cavity using an RF pulse Compression SLED Cavity, in5th In- ternational Beam Instrumentation Conference(2017) p. WEPG77

    2017

  21. [28]

    R. H. Dicke, Coherence in spontaneous radiation pro- cesses, Phys. Rev.93, 99 (1954)

    1954

  22. [29]

    Gross and S

    M. Gross and S. Haroche, Superradiance: An essay on the theory of collective spontaneous emission, Physics Reports93, 301 (1982)

    1982

  23. [30]

    Rohringer and R

    N. Rohringer and R. London, Atomic inner-shell x-ray laser pumped by an x-ray free-electron laser, Phys. Rev. A80, 013809 (2009). 9

    2009

  24. [31]

    Rohringer et.al., Atomic inner-shell x-ray laser at 1.46 nanometres pumped by an x-ray free-electron laser, Na- ture481, 488 EP (2012)

    N. Rohringer et.al., Atomic inner-shell x-ray laser at 1.46 nanometres pumped by an x-ray free-electron laser, Na- ture481, 488 EP (2012)

    2012

  25. [33]

    Kroll, C

    T. Kroll, C. Weninger, R. Alonso-Mori, D. Sokaras, D. Zhu, L. Mercadier, V. P. Majety, A. Marinelli, A. Lut- man, M. W. Guetg, F.-J. Decker, S. Boutet, A. Aquila, J. Koglin, J. Koralek, D. P. DePonte, J. Kern, F. D. Fuller, E. Pastor, T. Fransson, Y. Zhang, J. Yano, V. K. Yach...

    2018

  26. [34]

    M. D. Doyle, A. Halavanau, Y. Zhang, Y. Michine, J. Ev- erts, F. Fuller, R. Alonso-Mori, M. Yabashi, I. Inoue, T. Osaka, J. Yamada, Y. Inubushi, T. Hara, J. Kern, J. Yano, V. K. Yachandra, N. Rohringer, H. Yoneda, T. Kroll, C. Pellegrini, and U. Bergmann, Seeded stimu- lated x...

    2023

  27. [35]

    T. M. Linker, A. Halavanau, T. Kroll, A. Benedik- tovitch, Y. Zhang, Y. Michine, S. Chuchurka, Z. Ab- hari, D. Ronchetti, T. Fransson, C. Weninger, F. D. Fuller, A. Aquila, R. Alonso-Mori, S. Boutet, M. W. Guetg, A. Marinelli, A. A. Lutman, M. Yabashi, I. In- oue, T. Osaka, J....

    2025 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Chuchurka, A

    S. Chuchurka, A. Benediktovitch, i. c. v. Kruˇ siˇ c, A. Hala- vanau, and N. Rohringer, Stochastic modeling of x-ray superfluorescence, Phys. Rev. A109, 033725 (2024)

    2024

  29. [37]

    Chuchurka, V

    S. Chuchurka, V. Sukharnikov, and N. Rohringer, Hermi- tian stochastic methodology for x-ray superfluorescence, Phys. Rev. A109, 063705 (2024)

    2024

  30. [38]

    P. Emma, R. Akre, J. Arthur, R. Bionta, C. Bost- edt, J. Bozek, A. Brachmann, P. Bucksbaum, R. Cof- fee, F. J. Decker, Y. Ding, D. Dowell, S. Edstrom, A. Fisher, J. Frisch, S. Gilevich, J. Hastings, G. Hays, P. Hering, Z. Huang, R. Iverson, H. Loos, M. Messer- schmidt, A. Miah...

    2010

  31. [39]

    Chollet, R

    M. Chollet, R. Alonso-Mori, M. Cammarata, D. Dami- ani, J. Defever, J. T. Delor, Y. Feng, J. M. Glownia, J. B. Langton, S. Nelson, K. Ramsey, A. Robert, M. Sikorski, S. Song, D. Stefanescu, V. Srinivasan, D. Zhu, H. T. Lemke, and D. M. Fritz, The X-ray Pump–Probe instru- ment ...

    2015

  32. [40]

    Inoue, T

    I. Inoue, T. Sato, R. Robles, M. H. Seaberg, Y. Sun, D. Zhu, D. Cesar, Y. Ding, V. Esposito, P. Franz, V. Guo, A. Halavanau, N. S. Sudar, Z. Zhang, Y. Inubushi, T. Os- aka, G. Yamaguchi, Y. Sano, K. Yamauchi, M. Yabashi, A. Marinelli, and J. Yamada, Nanofocused attosecond hard...

    2025

  33. [41]

    M. Kato, T. Tanaka, T. Kurosawa, N. Saito, M. Richter, A. A. Sorokin, K. Tiedtke, T. Kudo, K. Tono, M. Yabashi, and T. Ishikawa, Pulse energy measurement at the hard x-ray laser in japan, Appl. Phys. Lett.101, 023503 (2012)

    2012

  34. [42]

    We found that approximately 6.5% of all pulses exhibited a single spike in their spectrum (Fig

    based on a thin, bent silicon (220) crystal (10µm thickness) and a two-dimensional detector (Alvium), po- sitioned between the intensity monitor and the focusing optics. We found that approximately 6.5% of all pulses exhibited a single spike in their spectrum (Fig. 1 (b) shows...

  35. [43]

    D. Zhu, M. Cammarata, J. M. Feldkamp, D. M. Fritz, J. B. Hastings, S. Lee, H. T. Lemke, A. Robert, J. L. Turner, and Y. Feng, A single-shot transmissive spec- trometer for hard x-ray free electron lasers, App. Phys. Lett.101, 034103 (2012)

    2012

  36. [44]

    Mozzanica, M

    A. Mozzanica, M. Andr¨ a, R. Barten, A. Bergamaschi, S. Chiriotti, M. Br¨ uckner, R. Dinapoli, E. Fr¨ ojdh, D. Greiffenberg, F. Leonarski, C. Lopez-Cuenca, D. Mezza, S. Redford, C. Ruder, B. Schmitt, X. Shi, D. Thattil, G. Tinti, S. Vetter, and J. Zhang, The jungfrau detector ...

    2018

  37. [45]

    Halavanau, A

    A. Halavanau, A. Benediktovitch, A. A. Lutman, D. De- Ponte, D. Cocco, N. Rohringer, U. Bergmann, and C. Pel- legrini, Population inversion x-ray laser oscillator, Pro- ceedings of the National Academy of Sciences117, 15511 (2020)

    2020

  38. [46]

    Jurek, S.-K

    Z. Jurek, S.-K. Son, B. Ziaja, and R. Santra,XMDYN andXATOM: versatile simulation tools for quantitative modeling of X-ray free-electron laser induced dynamics of matter, J. Appl. Cryst.49, 1048 (2016)

    2016

  39. [47]

    Campbell and T

    J. Campbell and T. Papp, Widths of the atomic k–n7 lev- els, Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables77, 1 (2001)

    2001

  40. [48]

    H. N. Chapman, P. Fromme, A. Barty, T. A. White, R. A. Kirian, A. Aquila, M. S. Hunter, J. Schulz, D. P. De- Ponte, U. Weierstall, R. B. Doak, F. R. N. C. Maia, A. V. Martin, I. Schlichting, L. Lomb, N. Coppola, R. L. Shoe- man, S. W. Epp, R. Hartmann, D. Rolles, A. Rudenko, L...

    2011

  41. [49]

    Inoue, Y

    I. Inoue, Y. Inubushi, T. Sato, K. Tono, T. Katayama, T. Kameshima, K. Ogawa, T. Togashi, S. Owada, Y. Amemiya, T. Tanaka, T. Hara, and M. Yabashi, Ob- servation of femtosecond x-ray interactions with matter using an x-ray–x-ray pump–probe scheme, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA113...

    2016

  42. [50]

    Inoue, V

    I. Inoue, V. Tkachenko, K. J. Kapcia, V. Lipp, B. Zi- aja, Y. Inubushi, T. Hara, M. Yabashi, and E. Nishibori, Delayed onset and directionality of x-ray-induced atomic displacements observed on subatomic length scales, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 223203 (2022)

    2022

  43. [51]

    Ziaja, R

    B. Ziaja, R. A. London, and J. Hajdu, Unified model of secondary electron cascades in diamond, Journal of Applied Physics97, 064905 (2005)

    2005

  44. [52]

    Inoue, Y

    I. Inoue, Y. Deguchi, B. Ziaja, T. Osaka, M. M. Ab- dullah, Z. Jurek, N. Medvedev, V. Tkachenko, Y. In- 10 ubushi, H. Kasai, K. Tamasaku, T. Hara, E. Nishibori, and M. Yabashi, Atomic-scale visualization of ultrafast bond breaking in x-ray-excited diamond, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126...

    2021

  45. [53]

    Inoue, J

    I. Inoue, J. Yamada, K. J. Kapcia, M. Stransky, V. Tkachenko, Z. Jurek, T. Inoue, T. Osaka, Y. In- ubushi, A. Ito, Y. Tanaka, S. Matsuyama, K. Yamauchi, M. Yabashi, and B. Ziaja, Femtosecond reduction of atomic scattering factors triggered by intense x-ray pulse, Phys. Rev. Le...

    2023

  46. [54]

    Fl¨ ottmann, ASTRA: A Space Charge Tracking Al- gorithm,https://www.desy.de/ ~mpyflo/(2023), User’s manual, DESY, Hamburg

    K. Fl¨ ottmann, ASTRA: A Space Charge Tracking Al- gorithm,https://www.desy.de/ ~mpyflo/(2023), User’s manual, DESY, Hamburg

    2023

  47. [55]

    Borland,Elegant: A flexible SDDS-compliant code for accelerator simulation, Tech

    M. Borland,Elegant: A flexible SDDS-compliant code for accelerator simulation, Tech. Rep. (Argonne National Lab., IL (US), 2000)

    2000

  48. [56]

    Wang and M

    Y. Wang and M. Borland, Pelegant: A parallel accelera- tor simulation code for electron generation and tracking, inAIP Conference Proceedings, Vol. 877 (American In- stitute of Physics, 2006) pp. 241–247

    2006

  49. [57]

    S. Reiche, Genesis 1.3: a fully 3d time-dependent fel simulation code, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment429, 243 (1999)

    1999

  50. [58]

    Reiche, Genesis-1.3-version4,https://github.com/ svenreiche/Genesis-1.3-Version4(2022)

    S. Reiche, Genesis-1.3-version4,https://github.com/ svenreiche/Genesis-1.3-Version4(2022)

    2022

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.