Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

First joint absorption and T$_e$-based metallicity measured in a GRB host galaxy at $z=4.28$ using JWST/NIRSpec

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read In the host of GRB 050505 at z=4.28, absorption and electron-temperature metallicities agree, suggesting afterglow absorption lines can trace galaxy chemistry.

desk verdict A careful, honest paper with a genuinely new measurement, but the central absorption–Te metallicity agreement leans on a value the authors themselves call a lower limit. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.08114 v1 pith:EIFBGYG5 submitted 2025-06-09 astro-ph.GA

Anne Inkenhaag , Patricia Schady , Phil Wiseman , Robert M. Yates , Maryam Arabsalmani , Lise Christensen , Valerio D'Elia , Massimiliano De Pasquale
show 15 more authors
Rubén García-Benito Dieter H. Hartmann Páll Jakobsson Tanmoy Laskar Andrew J. Levan Giovanna Pugliese Andrea Rossi Ruben Salvaterra Sandra Savaglio Boris Sbarufatti Rhaana L. C. Starling Nial Tanvir Berk Topçu Susanna D. Vergani Klaas Wiersema
This is my paper
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords gamma-raybursts:generalindividual:GRB050505galaxies:abundancestransients:burstsJWST/NIRSpecspectroscopyelectrontemperatureinterstellarmediummetallicityhigh-redshiftgalaxies
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports the first gamma-ray burst (GRB) host galaxy in which the metallicity of cold neutral gas, seen in afterglow absorption, and the metallicity of warm ionized gas, seen in emission, are measured together with a direct temperature-based method. For the host of GRB 050505 at $z=4.28$, JWST/NIRSpec spectroscopy detects the faint $[{\rm O\,III}]\,\lambda4363$ auroral line and yields an electron-temperature-based metallicity of $12+\log(\mathrm{O/H}) = 7.80\pm0.19$ and $7.96\pm0.21$ for two standard calibrations. A redetermined absorption metallicity from the afterglow spectrum, corrected for dust depletion, is $12+\log(\mathrm{O/H}) = 7.66\pm0.11$, in agreement with the emission value within the uncertainties. The authors argue that this agreement shows the warm and cold interstellar phases are efficiently mixed along the line of sight, and that GRB afterglow absorption lines can be a reliable tracer of host galaxy metallicity at high redshift. If the result holds for a larger sample, GRB absorption spectroscopy could trace cosmic chemical enrichment to the earliest epochs and in galaxies too faint for emission-line work, even with JWST.

What carries the argument

The measurement is carried by the temperature-sensitive $[{\rm O\,III}]\,\lambda4363$ auroral line, whose ratio to the nebular $[{\rm O\,III}]\,\lambda4959,5007$ lines fixes the electron temperature of the ionized gas; a two-zone ionization model then links $T_e([{\rm O\,III}])$ to $T_e([{\rm O\,II}])$ and yields the oxygen abundance. On the absorption side, the machinery is a simultaneous dust-depletion fit to the relative abundances of singly ionized metal species, using published depletion patterns, which extracts the neutral-gas metallicity while accounting for dust along the line of sight. The two probes meet because long GRBs trace massive-star formation, so both measurements sample the same region of the same galaxy.

What would settle it

Obtain high-resolution spectroscopy of a GRB afterglow whose host galaxy also has a JWST/NIRSpec detection of $[{\rm O\,III}]\,\lambda4363$, and compare the unsaturated, depletion-corrected absorption metallicity with the $T_e$-based emission metallicity; a systematic excess of the absorption value by more than about $0.3$ dex would break the claimed agreement. For GRB 050505 specifically, a high-resolution re-measurement showing that the true absorption metallicity lies above about $8.1$ in $12+\log(\mathrm{O/H})$ would falsify the conclusion as drawn.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that, in the host of GRB 050505 at $z=4.28$, two independent metallicity measurements probing different gas phases agree: the absorption-line metallicity of the cold neutral interstellar medium, $12+\log(\mathrm{O/H}) = 7.66\pm0.11$ after a dust-depletion fit, and the electron-temperature-based emission metallicity of the warm ionized gas, $12+\log(\mathrm{O/H}) = 7.80\pm0.19$ and $7.96\pm0.21$ for two common temperature calibrations. This is the first joint absorption plus $T_e$-based measurement in a GRB host, made possible by the detection of the temperature-sensitive $[{\rm O\,III}]\,\lambda4363$ auroral line in JWST/NIRSpec data. Because long GRBs explode in star-forming regions, the afterglow sightline and the emission-line gas trace the same stellar population; the observed agreement therefore implies efficient mixing between neutral and ionized gas and supports the use of afterglow absorption lines as a non-flux-limited tracer of galaxy chemical enrichment.

Load-bearing premise

The absorption metallicity rests on a low-resolution Keck spectrum from 2006 whose metal lines may hide partial saturation; if the true cold-gas metallicity is noticeably higher than the measured $12+\log(\mathrm{O/H})\sim7.7$, the agreement with the temperature-based value could disappear.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the agreement holds, GRB afterglow absorption spectroscopy can be trusted as a metallicity tracer for galaxies too faint for emission-line work, extending chemical-evolution studies beyond JWST's flux limits.
  • The consistency between the absorption and $T_e$-based metallicities implies that metals produced in star-forming regions are efficiently distributed into the neutral interstellar medium along this sightline.
  • Strong-line diagnostics that depend strongly on ionization parameter, such as $N2$, $S2$, $O3N2$ and $Ne3O2$, perform worse; ionization-parameter-insensitive diagnostics such as $R23$, or those explicitly calibrated for high-redshift conditions, track the temperature-based value better.
  • Simulation-based expectations predict best agreement between absorption and emission metallicities for high-column-density sightlines close to a galaxy centre, matching the properties of this GRB sightline.
  • Expanding the sample of high-redshift GRB hosts with $[{\rm O\,III}]\,\lambda4363$ detections could turn this single-object result into a general method for tracing cosmic chemical evolution.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the relation is confirmed in larger samples, part of the historical scatter between absorption and emission metallicities may be due to selection effects, such as emission samples being flux-limited and absorption sightlines being dust-poor, rather than a genuine physical difference between the neutral and ionized gas.
  • Because the absorption metallicity here is formally a lower limit, future high-resolution afterglow spectroscopy of similar systems that measures unsaturated column densities could reveal a small systematic offset; quantifying that offset would constrain metal mixing timescales and abundance gradients.
  • Applying the same JWST/NIRSpec strategy to GRB hosts at $z>6$ would test whether the efficient warm-cold mixing seen at $z=4.28$ persists at earlier epochs, when the universe is younger and enrichment may be patchier.
  • The strong-line diagnostic comparison suggests a practical ranking: high-redshift metallicity surveys should prefer $R23$-type ratios or high-ionization calibrated relations, and treat ionization-parameter-sensitive single-ion ratios as unreliable.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. This paper reports JWST/NIRSpec rest-frame optical spectroscopy of the host galaxy of GRB 050505 at z=4.28, detecting the temperature-sensitive [O III] lambda 4363 auroral line and deriving Te-based oxygen abundances of 12+log(O/H)=7.80+-0.14 (Izotov et al. 2006 method) and 7.96+-0.21 (Yates et al. 2020 method). The absorption-line metallicity of the cold ISM from the Keck/LRIS afterglow spectrum is recomputed with a dust-depletion fit, giving 12+log(O/H)=7.66+-0.11. The paper compares these values with each other and with a battery of strong-line diagnostics, concluding that the absorption and Te-based metallicities agree and that this implies efficient mixing between warm and cold ISM phases along the GRB sightline. The work is presented as the first such joint absorption and Te-based metallicity measurement in a GRB host galaxy at high redshift.

Significance. If the central agreement is robust, this is a valuable result: it would be the first direct comparison of GRB-afterglow absorption metallicities with the most reliable emission-line metallicity method at z>4, and it would support using GRB absorption spectroscopy to trace chemical enrichment in galaxies too faint for emission-line work. The paper also provides a rare high-redshift Te measurement for a GRB host and a careful multi-diagnostic comparison. The analysis is generally thorough in its treatment of line fitting and extinction, and the public JWST data make the emission-line part reproducible. However, the key inference depends on a single object and, more importantly, on the absorption metallicity being a true measurement rather than a lower limit; the paper itself states in Section 4.2.1 that hidden saturation means the absorption metallicity should be treated as a lower limit.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 4.2.1, Fig. 5] The central claim of agreement between Z_abs and the Te-based metallicities is not secure because Z_abs is a lower limit, as the paper itself acknowledges in Section 4.2.1: the LRIS lines 'can suffer from hidden saturation, and the metallicity should thus be considered a lower limit.' The dust-depletion fit in Fig. 5 treats all relative abundances as detections, even though Berger et al. identified Si II and Ni II as the likely unsaturated species and these lie above the best-fit relation. If saturated low-ionization lines pull the fit down, [M/H]=-1.03+-0.11 could be biased low. Since saturation can only raise the true Z_abs, the apparent consistency with 12+log(O/H)=7.80-7.96 is not a two-sided test. I request a quantitative treatment of lower limits in the depletion fit (for example, fitting only the unsaturated species, or a survival-analysis fit with upper limits propagated) and a statement of how high the absorption metallicity could plausibly be before the agreement disappears.
  2. [Section 3.2.1, Table 2] The Te-based metallicities carry an additional systematic uncertainty that is not reflected in the quoted errors. The two adopted methods differ by 0.16 dex (7.80 vs 7.96), driven mainly by the assumed Te([O II])-Te([O III]) relation, and the quoted uncertainties of 0.14 and 0.21 dex do not include the relation's systematic scatter. Moreover, the [O III] lambda 4363 detection is at only about 2.7 sigma (flux 0.08+-0.03 in Table 1), so the Te measurement itself is marginal. The conclusion that Z_abs agrees with Z_SF(Te) should therefore be framed with an explicit statement that the systematic spread between the two Te methods is comparable to the statistical errors and that the agreement is at best tentative.
  3. [Section 4.2.2, Table 3] The abstract states that strong-line diagnostics appropriate for high-z galaxies 'find good agreement' with the other two methods, but Table 3 shows that many diagnostics disagree with the Te-based values at >1 sigma (e.g., R2 NOX22 gives 8.17+-0.05, S2 NOX22 gives 8.34+-0.07, and several SST24 diagnostics exceed 8.1), and consistency is only reached after adding an adopted 0.2 dex systematic uncertainty that is not derived from the data. The only strong-line ratios that agree within 1 sigma with Z_SF(Te) are R23 and R3 for the high-EW NOX22 and some SST24 cases. The text should more clearly distinguish between diagnostics that actually agree and those that agree only after a generous systematic error is added, and the summary statement should be softened accordingly.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section 2.1] There is a typo: 'rest fame wavelength' should be 'rest frame wavelength.'
  2. [Figure 3 caption] The caption reads 'central wavelengths and line widths or all lines'; this should be 'of all lines.'
  3. [Table 1] The [Ne III] lambda 3967 uncorrected flux is listed as 0.08+-0.25, while the corrected flux is 0.16+-0.07; the error should not decrease after a multiplicative extinction correction, so this entry appears to contain a typo or a propagation error and should be checked.
  4. [Section 4.1.1] The reported comparison temperatures contain notation typos: 'Te([O III]) = 10500 ± 0.0500 K' and '13400±0.2000 K' should presumably read 10500±500 K and 13400±2000 K.
  5. [Abstract] The sentence 'this suggest that metallicities determined via GRB afterglow spectroscopy...' has a subject-verb agreement error ('suggest' should be 'suggests').
  6. [Section 1] The footnote defining [X/Y] is missing the division signs in the displayed formula; as printed, it reads as a ratio of logarithms rather than a logarithmic abundance ratio.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No circular derivation: the absorption and Te-based metallicities are independently measured, and the agreement is an empirical outcome; only methodological self-citations appear.

full rationale

The central comparison is between an absorption metallicity re-fit from Keck/LRIS column densities (Berger et al. 2006) using De Cia et al. (2016) depletion patterns and a Te-based metallicity derived from JWST/NIRSpec [OIII]4363 line fluxes with Izotov et al. (2006) and Yates et al. (2020) relations. These are independent inputs: the depletion-pattern fit has no Te-based quantity as input, and the Te calculation uses neither Z_abs nor the depletion fit. The SL-diagnostic comparison is an application of externally calibrated relations, not a calibration performed here; the several diagnostics disagree by up to ~0.6 dex, so the partial agreement with Te is not forced by construction. The only self-citations (Wiseman et al. 2017 procedure; Schady et al. 2024 sample) are methodological and not load-bearing. The paper's own caveat (Sec. 4.2.1: LRIS hidden saturation makes Z_abs a lower limit) is an observational limitation that affects the strength of the agreement, but it does not make any equation reduce to its input. No self-definitional step, no fitted parameter renamed as a prediction, and no uniqueness claim imported from the authors' prior work were found.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central agreement rests on a chain of standard astrophysical calibrations, none of which are invented for this paper. The most load-bearing are the Te([OII])-Te([OIII]) relation, the Balmer-derived extinction, the SMC extinction curve, and the De Cia depletion patterns. The paper is transparent about the assumptions and provides bracketing methods where possible.

free parameters (3)
  • Absorption metallicity [M/H] from dust depletion fit = -1.03 ± 0.11
    Fitted to the relative abundances from Berger et al. (2006) using De Cia et al. (2016) depletion patterns; this value is the core Z_abs input and is a lower limit if saturation is present.
  • Systematic uncertainty added to SL diagnostics without quoted errors = 0.2 dex
    Hand-chosen value for NOX22-average, LMC24, SCC25, S18 diagnostics; affects the error bars but not the central values.
  • [S II] lambda 6717/6731 amplitude ratio = 1.4 (maximum for n_e < 100 cm^-3)
    Forced to the theoretical maximum because only one component is detected; affects the S2 diagnostic, which is not central to the main claim.
assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption Two-zone ionization model: Te([OII]) related to Te([OIII]) via literature calibrations (Izotov et al. 2006; Yates et al. 2020)
    Section 3.2.1. The absence of [OII] auroral lines forces an assumed relation to derive Te([OII]) and hence O+/H+; the two relations bracket the metallicity.
  • domain assumption Case-B Balmer decrement (Halpha/Hbeta = 2.86) for extinction correction
    Section 3.1. Used to derive E(B-V)=0.18±0.07; if the true temperature/density differs, the line flux corrections and metallicity shift.
  • domain assumption SMC extinction curve is appropriate for the GRB host galaxy
    Section 3.1. Justified by low mass/metallicity of GRB hosts, but a different curve changes corrected fluxes.
  • domain assumption De Cia et al. (2016) dust depletion patterns apply to this line of sight
    Section 4.2.1. The absorption metallicity [M/H]=-1.03 is obtained by fitting these patterns; if the depletion is different, Z_abs changes.
  • domain assumption The LRIS absorption column densities from Berger et al. (2006) are not severely saturated
    Section 4.2.1. The paper notes hidden saturation would make Z_abs a lower limit; the agreement with Te-based value could break if saturation is severe.
  • domain assumption All emission lines trace the same gas, so a single redshift and velocity width can be imposed
    Section 3.1. Tying sigma and redshift to the Hbeta/OIII fit constrains the weak [OIII]4363 fit; if the auroral line originates in different gas, the flux could shift by about 5%.
  • domain assumption NOX22 high-EW calibrations are appropriate for this galaxy despite unmeasured EW(Hbeta)
    Section 3.2.2. Based on the high ionization ratio and Nakajima et al. (2023), but not directly verified; affects the SL metallicities that agree with Z_abs.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of First joint absorption and T$_e$-based metallicity measured in a GRB host galaxy at $z=4.28$ using JWST/NIRSpec." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/EIFBGYG5

@misc{pith2026250608114,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: First joint absorption and T$_e$-based metallicity measured in a GRB host galaxy at $z=4.28$ using JWST/NIRSpec},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/EIFBGYG5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.08114}
}
abstract

We present the first gamma-ray burst (GRB) host galaxy with a measured absorption line and electron temperature (T$_e$) based metallicity, using the temperature sensitive [OIII]$\lambda$4363 auroral line detected in the JWST/NIRSpec spectrum of the host of GRB 050505 at redshift $z=4.28$. We find that the metallicity of the cold interstellar gas, derived from the absorption lines in the GRB afterglow, of 12 + log(O/H)$\sim 7.7$ is in reasonable agreement with the temperature-based emission line metallicity in the warm gas of the GRB host galaxy, which has values of 12 + log(O/H) = 7.80$\pm$0.19 and 7.96$\pm$0.21 for two common indicators. When using strong emission line diagnostics appropriate for high-z galaxies and sensitive to ionisation parameter, we find good agreement between the strong emission line metallicity and the other two methods. Our results imply that, for the host of GRB050505, mixing between the warm and the cold ISM along the line of sight to the GRB is efficient, and that GRB afterglow absorption lines can be a reliable tracer of the metallicity of the galaxy. If confirmed with a large sample, this suggest that metallicities determined via GRB afterglow spectroscopy can be used to trace cosmic chemical evolution to the earliest cosmic epochs and in galaxies far too faint for emission line spectroscopy, even for JWST.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.08114 by the authors.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Spectrum of the host of GRB 050505, zoomed in on the wavelength region where emission lines were detected. The blue line is the spectrum taken using the G235M/F170LP grism/filter combination and the orange line is the spectrum taken using the G395M/F290LP grism/filter combination. The spectrum has been de-redshifted to the rest frame wavelengths to allow for easier emission line identification and the emission lines… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Fit of the H𝛾 and [O iii]𝜆4363 emission lines of the host of GRB 050505. The data are shown in blue and the combined Gaussians that were fit tothe data are in black. The grey shaded area corresponds to the 3𝜎 error of the best combined fit to the data. The central wavelengths and line widths or all lines were fixed to the values obtained from the fit of H𝛽 and [O iii]𝜆𝜆4959,5007(see Fig. A1, panel 3) as these lines … view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Comparison of the metallicities listed in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Trading oxygen for iron II. Oxygen- versus iron-dependent cosmic star formation history

    astro-ph.GA 2025-11 conditional novelty 6.5 of 10

    Most cosmic star formation occurred in gas with non-solar O/Fe; the cosmic mean [Fe/H] lags [O/H] by up to ~0.5 dex.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

131 extracted references · 21 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Arabsalmani M., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx2451 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.473.3312A 473, 3312

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stx2451 2018

  2. [2]

    Arabsalmani M., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/acd4b7 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...952...67A 952, 67

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acd4b7 2023

  3. [3]

    Z., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ac9ab2 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...940L..23A 940, L23

    Arellano-C \'o rdova K. Z., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ac9ab2 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...940L..23A 940, L23

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac9ab2 2022

  4. [4]

    J., Scott P., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev.astro.46.060407.145222 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ARA&A..47..481A 47, 481

    Asplund M., Grevesse N., Sauval A. J., Scott P., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev.astro.46.060407.145222 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ARA&A..47..481A 47, 481

    arXiv 2009

  5. [5]

    Astropy Collaboration et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 2013

  6. [6]

    Astropy Collaboration et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018AJ....156..123A 156, 123

    doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f 2018

  7. [7]

    Astropy Collaboration et al., 2022, @doi [apj] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac7c74 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...935..167A 935, 167

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac7c74 2022

  8. [8]

    E., Cenko S

    Berger E., Penprase B. E., Cenko S. B., Kulkarni S. R., Fox D. B., Steidel C. C., Reddy N. A., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/501162 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006ApJ...642..979B 642, 979

    work page doi:10.1086/501162 2006

Show all 131 references
  1. [9]

    Bolmer J., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201834422 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...623A..43B 623, A43

    2019 doi

  2. [10]

    K., Salas H., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201834156 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...622A.103B 622, A103

    Boquien M., Burgarella D., Roehlly Y., Buat V., Ciesla L., Corre D., Inoue A. K., Salas H., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201834156 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...622A.103B 622, A103

    2019 doi

  3. [11]

    Bushouse H., et al., 2025, JWST Calibration Pipeline, @doi 10.5281/zenodo.14597407

    2025 doi

  4. [12]

    J., Katz H., Rey M

    Cameron A. J., Katz H., Rey M. P., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnrasl/slad046 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.522L..89C 522, L89

    2023 doi

  5. [13]

    A., Clayton G

    Cardelli J. A., Clayton G. C., Mathis J. S., 1989, @doi [ ] 10.1086/167900 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1989ApJ...345..245C 345, 245

    1989 doi

  6. [14]

    Chabrier G., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1086/376392 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003PASP..115..763C 115, 763

    2003 doi

  7. [15]

    Christensen L., Hjorth J., Gorosabel J., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20040361 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004A&A...425..913C 425, 913

    2004 doi

  8. [16]

    Christensen L., et al., 2012, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.22007.x , 427, 1973

    2012

  9. [17]

    X., Cooke R

    Cucchiara A., Fumagalli M., Rafelski M., Kocevski D., Prochaska J. X., Cooke R. J., Becker G. D., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/804/1/51 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...804...51C 804, 51

    2015 doi

  10. [18]

    Curti M., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac2737 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.518..425C 518, 425

    2023 doi

  11. [19]

    Curti M., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202346698 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...684A..75C 684, A75

    2024 doi

  12. [20]

    D'Elia V., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201323057 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014A&A...564A..38D 564, A38

    2014 doi

  13. [21]

    B., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201527895 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016A&A...596A..97D 596, A97

    De Cia A., Ledoux C., Mattsson L., Petitjean P., Srianand R., Gavignaud I., Jenkins E. B., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201527895 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016A&A...596A..97D 596, A97

    2016 doi

  14. [22]

    De Cia A., Ledoux C., Petitjean P., Savaglio S., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201731970 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018A&A...611A..76D 611, A76

    2018 doi

  15. [23]

    Decleir M., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac5dbe , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...930...15D 930, 15

    2022 doi

  16. [24]

    A., Kewley L

    Dopita M. A., Kewley L. J., Sutherland R. S., Nicholls D. C., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1007/s10509-016-2657-8 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016Ap&SS.361...61D 361, 61

    2016 doi

  17. [25]

    G., Pagel B

    Edmunds M. G., Pagel B. E. J., 1978, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/185.1.77P , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1978MNRAS.185P..77E 185, 77P

    1978 doi

  18. [26]

    L., Massa D., Gordon K

    Fitzpatrick E. L., Massa D., Gordon K. D., Bohlin R., Clayton G. C., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab4c3a , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...886..108F 886, 108

    2019 doi

  19. [27]

    Friis M., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv960 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.451..167F 451, 167

    2015 doi

  20. [29]

    Fynbo J. P. U., et al., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18318.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011MNRAS.413.2481F 413, 2481

    2011

  21. [30]

    Fynbo J. P. U., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stt1579 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.436..361F 436, 361

    2013 doi

  22. [31]

    J., et al., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1038/27150 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998Natur.395..670G 395, 670

    Galama T. J., et al., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1038/27150 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998Natur.395..670G 395, 670

    1998 doi

  23. [32]

    Gordon K., 2024, dust\_extinction , @doi 10.5281/zenodo.11235336

    2024 doi

  24. [33]

    D., Cartledge S., Clayton G

    Gordon K. D., Cartledge S., Clayton G. C., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/705/2/1320 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...705.1320G 705, 1320

    2009 doi

  25. [34]

    D., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac00b7 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...916...33G 916, 33

    Gordon K. D., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac00b7 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...916...33G 916, 33

    2021 doi

  26. [35]

    D., Clayton G

    Gordon K. D., Clayton G. C., Decleir M., Fitzpatrick E. L., Massa D., Misselt K. A., Tollerud E. J., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/accb59 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...950...86G 950, 86

    2023 doi

  27. [36]

    F., Fruchter A

    Graham J. F., Fruchter A. S., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/774/2/119 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...774..119G 774, 119

    2013 doi

  28. [37]

    F., Fruchter A

    Graham J. F., Fruchter A. S., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/834/2/170 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...834..170G 834, 170

    2017 doi

  29. [38]

    F., Schady P., Fruchter A

    Graham J. F., Schady P., Fruchter A. S., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/acbfab , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...954...13G 954, 13

    2023 doi

  30. [39]

    R., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020Natur.585..357H 585, 357

    Harris C. R., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020Natur.585..357H 585, 357

    2020 doi

  31. [40]

    E., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201425001 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015A&A...580A.139H 580, A139

    Hartoog O. E., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201425001 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015A&A...580A.139H 580, A139

    2015 doi

  32. [41]

    E., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/acb2cf , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...944L..30H 944, L30

    Heintz K. E., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/acb2cf , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...944L..30H 944, L30

    2023 doi

  33. [42]

    Henry R. B. C., Worthey G., 1999, @doi [ ] 10.1086/316403 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999PASP..111..919H 111, 919

    1999 doi

  34. [43]

    K., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20031144 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003A&A...410...83H 410, 83

    Hirashita H., Buat V., Inoue A. K., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20031144 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003A&A...410...83H 410, 83

    2003 doi

  35. [44]

    S., Salzer J

    Hirschauer A. S., Salzer J. J., Bresolin F., Saviane I., Yegorova I., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/150/3/71 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015AJ....150...71H 150, 71

    2015 doi

  36. [45]

    S., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad2745 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.526.3504H 526, 3504

    Hirschmann M., Charlot S., Somerville R. S., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad2745 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.526.3504H 526, 3504

    2023 doi

  37. [46]

    Hjorth J., et al., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1038/nature01750 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003Natur.423..847H 423, 847

    2003 doi

  38. [47]

    D., 2007, @doi [Computing in Science and Engineering] 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007CSE.....9...90H 9, 90

    Hunter J. D., 2007, @doi [Computing in Science and Engineering] 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007CSE.....9...90H 9, 90

    2007 doi

  39. [48]

    I., Stasi´nskastasi´nska G., Meynet G., Guseva N

    Izotov Y. I., Stasi´nskastasi´nska G., Meynet G., Guseva N. G., Thuan T. X., 2006, @doi [A&A] 10.1051/0004-6361:20053763 , 448, 955

    2006 doi

  40. [49]

    Izzo L., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx2244 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.472.4480I 472, 4480

    2017 doi

  41. [50]

    Kawai N., et al., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1038/nature04498 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006Natur.440..184K 440, 184

    2006 doi

  42. [51]

    Kennicutt Jr. R. C., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev.astro.36.1.189 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998ARA&A..36..189K 36, 189

    1998 doi

  43. [52]

    J., Dopita M

    Kewley L. J., Dopita M. A., 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1086/341326 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002ApJS..142...35K 142, 35

    2002 doi

  44. [53]

    J., Ellison S

    Kewley L. J., Ellison S. L., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1086/587500 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008ApJ...681.1183K 681, 1183

    2008 doi

  45. [54]

    J., Maier C., Yabe K., Ohta K., Akiyama M., Dopita M

    Kewley L. J., Maier C., Yabe K., Ohta K., Akiyama M., Dopita M. A., Yuan T., 2013a, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/774/1/L10 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...774L..10K 774, L10

    doi

  46. [55]

    J., Dopita M

    Kewley L. J., Dopita M. A., Leitherer C., Dav \'e R., Yuan T., Allen M., Groves B., Sutherland R., 2013b, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/774/2/100 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...774..100K 774, 100

    doi

  47. [56]

    K \"o ppen J., Hensler G., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20042266 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005A&A...434..531K 434, 531

    2005 doi

  48. [57]

    Krogager J.-K., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stt955 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.433.3091K 433, 3091

    2013 doi

  49. [58]

    Kr \"u hler T., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201425561 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015A&A...581A.125K 581, A125

    2015 doi

  50. [59]

    P., Galbany L., Gensior J., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201630268 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017A&A...602A..85K 602, A85

    Kr \"u hler T., Kuncarayakti H., Schady P., Anderson J. P., Galbany L., Gensior J., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201630268 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017A&A...602A..85K 602, A85

    2017 doi

  51. [60]

    H., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202347133 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...681A..70L 681, A70

    Laseter I. H., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202347133 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...681A..70L 681, A70

    2024 doi

  52. [61]

    Maiolino R., Mannucci F., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1007/s00159-018-0112-2 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&ARv..27....3M 27, 3

    2019 doi

  53. [62]

    Marques-Chaves R., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202347411 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...681A..30M 681, A30

    2024 doi

  54. [63]

    McGuire J. T. W., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/825/2/135 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...825..135M 825, 135

    2016 doi

  55. [64]

    Metha B., Trenti M., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa1114 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.495..266M 495, 266

    2020 doi

  56. [65]

    Metha B., Trenti M., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad165 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.520..879M 520, 879

    2023 doi

  57. [66]

    J., Trenti M., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab892 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.504.5992M 504, 5992

    Metha B., Cameron A. J., Trenti M., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab892 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.504.5992M 504, 5992

    2021 doi

  58. [67]

    Nakajima K., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/ac7710 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJS..262....3N 262, 3

    2022 doi

  59. [68]

    Nakajima K., Ouchi M., Isobe Y., Harikane Y., Zhang Y., Ono Y., Umeda H., Oguri M., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/acd556 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJS..269...33N 269, 33

    2023 doi

  60. [69]

    M., Prochaska J

    Neeleman M., Wolfe A. M., Prochaska J. X., Rafelski M., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/769/1/54 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...769...54N 769, 54

    2013 doi

  61. [70]

    B., Rawlik M., Ingargiola A., Nelson A., 2016, Lmfit: Non-Linear Least-Square Minimization and Curve-Fitting for Python , Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1606.014

    Newville M., Stensitzki T., Allen D. B., Rawlik M., Ingargiola A., Nelson A., 2016, Lmfit: Non-Linear Least-Square Minimization and Curve-Fitting for Python , Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1606.014

    2016

  62. [71]

    C., Dopita M

    Nicholls D. C., Dopita M. A., Sutherland R. S., Kewley L. J., Palay E., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0067-0049/207/2/21 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJS..207...21N 207, 21

    2013 doi

  63. [72]

    C., Dopita M

    Nicholls D. C., Dopita M. A., Sutherland R. S., Jerjen H., Kewley L. J., Basurah H., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/786/2/155 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...786..155N 786, 155

    2014 doi

  64. [73]

    C., Sutherland R

    Nicholls D. C., Sutherland R. S., Dopita M. A., Kewley L. J., Groves B. A., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw3235 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.466.4403N 466, 4403

    2017 doi

  65. [74]

    E., 1989, Astrophysics of gaseous nebulae and active galactic nuclei

    Osterbrock D. E., 1989, Astrophysics of gaseous nebulae and active galactic nuclei

    1989

  66. [75]

    E., Ferland G

    Osterbrock D. E., Ferland G. J., 2006, Astrophysics of gaseous nebulae and active galactic nuclei

    2006

  67. [76]

    T., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201834179 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...623A..26P 623, A26

    Palmerio J. T., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201834179 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...623A..26P 623, A26

    2019 doi

  68. [77]

    A., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty2508 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.481.3520P 481, 3520

    Patr \' cio V., Christensen L., Rhodin H., Ca \ n ameras R., Lara-L \'o pez M. A., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty2508 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.481.3520P 481, 3520

    2018 doi

  69. [78]

    Peimbert M., 1967, @doi [ ] 10.1086/149385 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1967ApJ...150..825P 150, 825

    1967 doi

  70. [79]

    A., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/817/1/8 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...817....8P 817, 8

    Perley D. A., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/817/1/8 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...817....8P 817, 8

    2016 doi

  71. [80]

    C., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev-astro-021820-120014 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ARA&A..58..363P 58, 363

    P \'e roux C., Howk J. C., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev-astro-021820-120014 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ARA&A..58..363P 58, 363

    2020 doi

  72. [81]

    L., Steidel C

    Pettini M., Ellison S. L., Steidel C. C., Bowen D. V., 1999, @doi [ ] 10.1086/306635 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999ApJ...510..576P 510, 576

    1999 doi

  73. [82]

    S., Grebel E

    Pilyugin L. S., Grebel E. K., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw238 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.457.3678P 457, 3678

    2016 doi

  74. [83]

    S., V \' lchez J

    Pilyugin L. S., V \' lchez J. M., Thuan T. X., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/720/2/1738 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...720.1738P 720, 1738

    2010 doi

  75. [84]

    Piranomonte S., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv1569 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.452.3293P 452, 3293

    2015 doi

  76. [85]

    Planck Collaboration et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201525830 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016A&A...594A..13P 594, A13

    2016 doi

  77. [86]

    Popesso P., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac3214 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.519.1526P 519, 1526

    2023 doi

  78. [87]

    X., Gawiser E., Wolfe A

    Prochaska J. X., Gawiser E., Wolfe A. M., Cooke J., Gelino D., 2003a, @doi [ ] 10.1086/375839 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003ApJS..147..227P 147, 227

    doi

  79. [88]

    X., Castro S., Djorgovski S

    Prochaska J. X., Castro S., Djorgovski S. G., 2003b, @doi [ ] 10.1086/376793 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003ApJS..148..317P 148, 317

    doi

  80. [89]

    X., et al., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1086/421988 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004ApJ...611..200P 611, 200

    Prochaska J. X., et al., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1086/421988 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004ApJ...611..200P 611, 200

    2004 doi

  81. [90]

    X., et al., 2007a, @doi [ ] 10.1086/510239 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJS..168..231P 168, 231

    Prochaska J. X., et al., 2007a, @doi [ ] 10.1086/510239 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJS..168..231P 168, 231

    doi

  82. [91]

    X., Chen H.-W., Dessauges-Zavadsky M., Bloom J

    Prochaska J. X., Chen H.-W., Dessauges-Zavadsky M., Bloom J. S., 2007b, @doi [ ] 10.1086/520042 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJ...666..267P 666, 267

    doi

  83. [92]

    M., Prochaska J

    Rafelski M., Wolfe A. M., Prochaska J. X., Neeleman M., Mendez A. J., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/755/2/89 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...755...89R 755, 89

    2012 doi

  84. [93]

    E., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/acaaaf , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...942L..14R 942, L14

    Rhoads J. E., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/acaaaf , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...942L..14R 942, L14

    2023 doi

  85. [94]

    Rhodin N. H. P., Christensen L., M ller P., Zafar T., Fynbo J. P. U., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201832992 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018A&A...618A.129R 618, A129

    2018 doi

  86. [95]

    Rogers N. S. J., Skillman E. D., Pogge R. W., Berg D. A., Croxall K. V., Bartlett J., Arellano-C \'o rdova K. Z., Moustakas J., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac947d , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...939...44R 939, 44

    2022 doi

  87. [96]

    Saccardi A., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202244205 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...671A..84S 671, A84

    2023 doi

  88. [97]

    L., et al., 2020, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/stz3032 , 491, 1427

    Sanders R. L., et al., 2020, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/stz3032 , 491, 1427

    2020 doi

  89. [98]

    L., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/abf4c1 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...914...19S 914, 19

    Sanders R. L., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/abf4c1 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...914...19S 914, 19

    2021 doi

  90. [99]

    L., Shapley A

    Sanders R. L., Shapley A. E., Topping M. W., Reddy N. A., Brammer G. B., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad15fc , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...962...24S 962, 24

    2024 doi

  91. [100]

    Savaglio S., 2006, @doi [New Journal of Physics] 10.1088/1367-2630/8/9/195 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006NJPh....8..195S 8, 195

    2006 doi

  92. [101]

    Schady P., et al., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11592.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007MNRAS.377..273S 377, 273

    2007

  93. [102]

    Schady P., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae677 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.529.2807S 529, 2807

    2024 doi

  94. [103]

    I., Naidu R., Guseva N

    Schaerer D., Marques-Chaves R., Barrufet L., Oesch P., Izotov Y. I., Naidu R., Guseva N. G., Brammer G., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202244556 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022A&A...665L...4S 665, L4

    2022 doi

  95. [104]

    F., Finkbeiner D

    Schlafly E. F., Finkbeiner D. P., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/737/2/103 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJ...737..103S 737, 103

    2011 doi

  96. [105]

    J., Finkbeiner D

    Schlegel D. J., Finkbeiner D. P., Davis M., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1086/305772 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998ApJ...500..525S 500, 525

    1998 doi

  97. [106]

    D., Palmerio J

    Schneider B., Le Floc'h E., Arabsalmani M., Vergani S. D., Palmerio J. T., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202243367 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022A&A...666A..14S 666, A14

    2022 doi

  98. [107]

    arXiv:2502.10499

    Scholte D., et al., 2025, arXiv e-prints, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025arXiv250210499S p. arXiv:2502.10499

    2025 arXiv

  99. [108]

    Schulze S., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/808/1/73 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...808...73S 808, 73

    2015 doi

  100. [109]

    Shi W.-B., et al., 2014, @doi [Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics] 10.1088/1674-4527/14/7/010 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014RAA....14..875S 14, 875

    2014 doi

  101. [110]

    Starling R. L. C., et al., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:200500181 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005A&A...442L..21S 442, L21

    2005 doi

  102. [111]

    Starling R. L. C., et al., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17879.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011MNRAS.411.2792S 411, 2792

    2011

  103. [112]

    Stasi \'n ska G., Izotov Y., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20021510 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003A&A...397...71S 397, 71

    2003 doi

  104. [113]

    Stasi \'n ska G., et al., eds, 2012, Oxygen in the Universe EAS Publications Series Vol. 54

    2012

  105. [114]

    Stasi \'n ska G., Izotov Y., Morisset C., Guseva N., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201425389 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015A&A...576A..83S 576, A83

    2015 doi

  106. [115]

    C., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/795/2/165 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...795..165S 795, 165

    Steidel C. C., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/795/2/165 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...795..165S 795, 165

    2014 doi

  107. [116]

    J., Zeippen C

    Storey P. J., Zeippen C. J., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03184.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000MNRAS.312..813S 312, 813

    2000

  108. [117]

    L., Steidel C

    Strom A. L., Steidel C. C., Rudie G. C., Trainor R. F., Pettini M., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aae1a5 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...868..117S 868, 117

    2018 doi

  109. [118]

    R., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/754/1/46 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...754...46T 754, 46

    Tanvir N. R., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/754/1/46 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...754...46T 754, 46

    2012 doi

  110. [119]

    M., Jensen J., Ellison S

    Teimoorinia H., Jalilkhany M., Scudder J. M., Jensen J., Ellison S. L., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab466 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.503.1082T 503, 1082

    2021 doi

  111. [120]

    C., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sts303 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.428.3590T 428, 3590

    Th \"o ne C. C., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sts303 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.428.3590T 428, 3590

    2013 doi

  112. [121]

    R., Edmunds M

    Thurston T. R., Edmunds M. G., Henry R. B. C., 1996, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/283.3..990 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996MNRAS.283..990T 283, 990

    1996 doi

  113. [122]

    R., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/acba8a , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...945...35T 945, 35

    Trump J. R., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/acba8a , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...945...35T 945, 35

    2023 doi

  114. [123]

    D., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201425013 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015A&A...581A.102V 581, A102

    Vergani S. D., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201425013 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015A&A...581A.102V 581, A102

    2015 doi

  115. [124]

    Vincenzo F., Belfiore F., Maiolino R., Matteucci F., Ventura P., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw532 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.458.3466V 458, 3466

    2016 doi

  116. [125]

    M., et al., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20066780 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007A&A...468...83V 468, 83

    Vreeswijk P. M., et al., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20066780 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007A&A...468...83V 468, 83

    2007 doi

  117. [126]

    M., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201219652 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A&A...549A..22V 549, A22

    Vreeswijk P. M., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201219652 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A&A...549A..22V 549, A22

    2013 doi

  118. [127]

    Wiersema K., et al., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20066273 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007A&A...464..529W 464, 529

    2007 doi

  119. [128]

    M., Greiner J., Fynbo J

    Wiseman P., Schady P., Bolmer J., Kr \"u hler T., Yates R. M., Greiner J., Fynbo J. P. U., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201629228 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017A&A...599A..24W 599, A24

    2017 doi

  120. [129]

    M., Gawiser E., Prochaska J

    Wolfe A. M., Gawiser E., Prochaska J. X., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev.astro.42.053102.133950 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005ARA&A..43..861W 43, 861

    2005

  121. [130]

    E., 1993, @doi [ ] 10.1086/172359 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1993ApJ...405..273W 405, 273

    Woosley S. E., 1993, @doi [ ] 10.1086/172359 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1993ApJ...405..273W 405, 273

    1993 doi

  122. [131]

    M., Schady P., Chen T

    Yates R. M., Schady P., Chen T. W., Schweyer T., Wiseman P., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201936506 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020A&A...634A.107Y 634, A107

    2020 doi

  123. [132]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION fin.entry write newline FUNCTION new.block output.state before.all = 'skip after.block 'output.state := if FUNCTION new.sentence output.state after.block = 'skip output.state before.all = 'skip after.sentence 'output.stat...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.