Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 54 references

AstroSat/UVIT Study of NGC 663: First detection of Be+sdOB systems in a young star cluster

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Using far-UV photometry of 23 Be stars in NGC 663, the authors report 16 Be+sdOB binaries, the first in a young cluster, implying most Be stars there formed by binary mass transfer.

desk verdict New UVIT photometry and a catalog worth having, but the 16 sdOB companions and the 69.5% binary fraction are likely artifacts of a disc-contaminated SED baseline that fits B0–B3 stars at 10,000–12,000 K. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.08126 v2 pith:PX2I56ZI submitted 2025-06-09 astro-ph.SR

Sneha Nedhath , Sharmila Rani , Annapurni Subramaniam , Elena Pancino This is my paper
classification astro-ph.SR
keywords BestarsNGC663openclusterssdOBsubdwarfsbinarymasstransferultravioletexcessspectralenergydistributionUVITphotometry
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper asks why Be stars—rapidly rotating B-type stars surrounded by gas discs—exist, and tests the binary mass-transfer hypothesis in a young open cluster where no Be+sdOB system had previously been found. Using far- and near-ultraviolet photometry from UVIT/AstroSat for 23 known Be stars in NGC 663, the authors find that 19 show a significant far-UV excess over a single-star model, and 16 of those are well described by a two-component fit: a cool Be star plus a hot, compact sdOB companion. Placing the hot components on the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram puts them on the helium-core-burning tracks of stripped stars with masses between 0.6 and 2.8 solar masses, matching the locus of field Be+sdO systems. The authors conclude that at least 69.5% of the cluster's Be stars are binaries that likely formed through mass transfer, making NGC 663 the first young cluster with direct evidence for the binary pathway to the Be phenomenon.

What carries the argument

The diagnostic engine is spectral energy distribution (SED) fitting as implemented in VOSA: observed fluxes from UVIT far- and near-UV, Gaia, SDSS, 2MASS, and WISE are compared with synthetic photometry computed from Kurucz model atmospheres for single-star fits, and then, for stars with excess far-UV flux, with two-component fits that combine a cool Kurucz photosphere with a hot component from the Kurucz, TMAP, or Levenhagen grids. The central observable is the far-UV excess—an FUV flux exceeding the best single-star model by more than 50%—which the authors take as a signature of a hot companion, since B-type stars lack chromospheric FUV emission and the paper argues Be circumstellar discs do not produce significant flux in the FUV.

What would settle it

Obtain high-resolution optical or FUV spectra of the 16 double-fit systems and search for the photospheric signature of the sdOB companion, such as He II lines or radial-velocity variations. If such signatures fail to appear in a clear majority of the systems, or if refitting the SEDs with a disc-inclusive model removes the far-UV excess for more than a few stars, the companion interpretation would be weakened; a simpler check is whether the FUV excess correlates with independent disc-strength indicators such as H-alpha emission or infrared excess.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is the detection of high-mass sdOB companions to Be stars in a young open cluster, inferred from far-UV excess in spectral energy distributions rather than from resolved spectroscopy. Of 23 Be stars detected by UVIT in NGC 663, 19 show a more than 50% deviation from single-star Kurucz model fits at FUV wavelengths, and 16 of these are successfully fitted with a double-component SED combining a cool Kurucz photosphere with a hot component drawn from the Kurucz, TMAP, or Levenhagen grids, with hot-component temperatures ranging from about 23,000 K to 90,000 K. These hot components occupy the same region of the HR diagram as known field Be+sdO companions and the model stripped stars of Götberg et al. (2018), indicating helium-core-burning sdOB stars with masses of 0.6 to 2.8 solar masses. Because the cluster is only about 25 Myr old, the authors argue that the primary stars were 7 to 9 solar masses and lost different amounts of mass during transfer, producing the observed spread in stripped-star masses, and that the cluster's dynamical environment likely shapes these binaries.

Load-bearing premise

The central assumption is that Be circumstellar discs emit negligible far-UV flux, so that an excess of FUV light over a one-star model can only come from a hot companion; if the discs do contribute in the FUV, some of the 19 reported excesses would be misattributed to companions.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • At least 69.5% of the Be stars in NGC 663 are binaries with hot companions, establishing binary mass transfer as the dominant formation channel for the Be population in this young cluster.
  • The detected sdOB companions are the first high-mass stripped companions found in a star cluster, extending the previously field-only Be+sdO population into open clusters.
  • The sdOB masses of 0.6 to 2.8 solar masses, produced from primaries of roughly 7 to 9 solar masses, indicate that mass transfer removes different amounts of mass in different systems, likely reflecting a range of orbital parameters.
  • High-resolution spectroscopy of the 16 binary candidates is the necessary next step to confirm their evolutionary status and measure the atmospheric abundances of the sdOB stars.
  • The companions occupy the long-lived helium-core-burning phase, so the sample can directly test theoretical models of stripped-star evolution in the mass range relevant to Be/X-ray binary progenitors.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same UV-excess SED method could be applied to other young open clusters with archival UVIT or GALEX data to measure whether the Be+sdOB binary fraction is universal or varies with cluster age, mass, or dynamical environment.
  • Because the single-component fits ignore any contribution from the Be circumstellar disc, a re-analysis with disc-inclusive models would test how many of the 19 far-UV excesses survive; the paper's assumption that the discs are FUV-quiet is the load-bearing premise of the companion interpretation.
  • The spread in stripped-star masses from similar initial primaries implies a link between mass-transfer efficiency and orbital parameters, which could be mapped by combining the authors' photometric variability data with future radial-velocity curves.
  • If the binary fraction holds up under spectroscopic confirmation, population-synthesis models that predict a large fraction of Be stars forming via mass transfer would gain their first cluster-scale observational calibration.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper presents UVIT/AstroSat far-UV and near-UV photometry of 23 known Be stars in the young open cluster NGC 663. Using multi-wavelength SED fitting with single Kurucz models and then two-component Kurucz/TMAP/L evenhagen models in VOSA, the authors report that 19 of 23 Be stars show a significant FUV excess, that 16 are well fitted with a hot companion, and that these companions are sdOB stars in the helium-core-burning phase. From this they conclude that at least 69.5% of the Be stars in NGC 663 were formed through binary mass transfer, claiming the first detection of Be+sdOB systems in a young star cluster.

Significance. If correct, this result would be important: it would provide the first cluster-based evidence for a large population of Be stars with stripped hot companions, directly supporting the binary mass-transfer formation channel. The paper uses archival UVIT data, a reasonable membership cross-match, and a standard SED-fitting tool. However, the central claim rests entirely on the definition of the FUV-excess baseline, and that baseline is, in my reading, not physically sound. The fitted cool-component temperatures contradict the published spectral types, so the claimed detection of hot companions is not supported by the evidence presented.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 5, Table B.1] The single-star baseline is defined by fitting one Kurucz SED to all photometry, including NUV and IR points that the paper itself says are contaminated by Be disc free-bound/free-free emission. This systematically biases the fitted photospheric temperature downward. The consequence is visible in Table B.1: the cool components of all 16 'binary' systems have Teff = 10,000–12,000 K, whereas Section 4 states that most Be stars in NGC 663 are spectroscopically B0–B3, corresponding to photospheric temperatures of roughly 20,000–30,000 K. A 10,000–12,000 K Kurucz model emits far less FUV flux than the real B0–B3 photosphere, so a large FUV excess, and hence the need for a hot second component, follows automatically. The remark in Section 5 that the disc is not efficient in the FUV does not address this: the bias enters through the NUV/IR points that set the overall model temperature and normalization. The confirmatory fit that omits wavelengths below 3000 Å is not shown and would not cure the problem because IR disc excess remains. This internal inconsistency between Table B.1 and the cited spectral classifications undermines the central detection claim.
  2. [Section 6, paragraph 4] The inferred masses of the Be stars (2–8 M_sun) are difficult to reconcile with the same stars being mostly B0–B3 spectral types, which have ZAMS masses of roughly 8–18 M_sun. This reinforces the interpretation that the fitted cool-component temperatures are not physical photospheric temperatures but effective continuum fits that absorb disc emission. The companion masses (0.6–2.8 M_sun) and the resulting 69.5% binary fraction are therefore unsupported by the data as presented.
  3. [Section 5, UV-excess criterion] The paper defines UV excess as a >50% deviation from the single-model SED fit, but it does not quantify how this threshold was chosen or test it against a realistic single-Be-star model that includes a circumstellar disc. Without such a control, the >50% criterion has no demonstrated selectivity. The quoted Vgfb<15 values only show that the chosen model family can be made to fit internally; they do not establish that the hot component is physically required rather than an artifact of an incorrect baseline.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 3, second paragraph] The filter name 'N236M' appears to be a typo; it should read 'N263M'.
  2. [Section 5, model setup] The model metallicity is fixed to [Fe/H] = -0.5 dex, but Section 2 adopts [Fe/H] = -0.125 dex from Dias et al. (2021) for the cluster; the discrepancy needs to be justified because it affects the Kurucz SED shapes and hence the fitted temperatures.
  3. [Software line in the reference list] The citation for Astropy is garbled: 'Astropy (Pigulski, A. et al. 2001, Astropy Collaboration et al. 2018)' should be replaced by the Astropy Collaboration 2018 entry only.
  4. [Figure B.1 caption] The caption states that the uppermost panel consists of three stars showing no UV excess, but Section 5 and Table B.1 imply four single-fit stars without UV excess, including GG95; please clarify or correct.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the UV-excess and companion parameters are fitted against external model grids and observed photometry, not defined by the paper's conclusion.

full rationale

The paper's central claim—that 19 of 23 Be stars show UV excess and 16 host hot sdOB companions—rests on comparing observed UVIT, Gaia, SDSS, 2MASS, and WISE photometry with Kurucz/TMAP/Levenhagen model SEDs. The FUV excess is an observed residual relative to a single-star Kurucz fit, and the companion's effective temperature, gravity, luminosity, and radius are then obtained by chi-square minimization against external stellar-atmosphere grids. Nothing in the derivation defines the predicted quantity as the fitted input: the existence of the excess is not equivalent to the presence of a companion by construction, because the binary fit must simultaneously reproduce the full multi-wavelength SED and can fail (as it did for three excess stars). The concern that Be-disc NUV/IR excess biases the cool photosphere toward low temperatures and thereby manufactures a spurious FUV excess is a model-systematics and physical-assumption issue, not circularity: the analysis allows for single-star fits with no companion and for unsuccessful binary fits. Self-citations (Rani et al. 2021 for the SED technique, and the UOCS series label) are methodological rather than load-bearing, and the key comparisons to stripped-star models and field Be+sdO systems use external work (Götberg et al. 2018; Wang et al. 2021). No circular step can be exhibited from the paper's equations or self-citation chain, so the appropriate finding is no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The analysis relies on standard stellar atmosphere grids, adopted cluster parameters, and external evolutionary models. The only hand-tuned inputs are the metallicity value (-0.5 dex), the UV-excess threshold, and an extinction range; none are measured. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (3)
  • Metallicity for model grid = -0.5 dex
    Set to -0.5 in VOSA for all stars, despite the adopted cluster value of -0.125 dex; affects the model photosphere shapes and can bias temperatures.
  • UV excess threshold = >50% deviation
    A star is classified as having UV excess if the FUV points deviate by more than 50% from the single-star fit; this threshold is arbitrary and not statistically justified.
  • Extinction A_V = 2.17 to 2.9 mag
    Taken from literature and used as a range; the differential reddening is not modeled in the SED fitting, so extinction uncertainty is not propagated into companion parameters.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Kurucz and TMAP stellar atmosphere models accurately represent the photospheric SEDs of Be stars and their hot companions.
    The SED fitting uses these grids; any mismatch (e.g., from the Be disc or from missing line blanketing) maps into systematic parameter errors. Invoked in Section 5.
  • domain assumption Cluster distance, age, and reddening from Dias et al. (2021) are correct.
    Distance (2.353 kpc), log age (7.403), and E(B-V)=0.7 are adopted for all SED fits and HR diagram placement. See Section 1.
  • domain assumption The Be disc emits negligibly in the FUV.
    Cited literature (Goraya 1986) is used to argue disc emission is inefficient in FUV; this justifies attributing FUV excess to companions, but the disc's NUV/IR excess is not included in the model baseline. See Section 5.
  • domain assumption Membership probabilities from Hunt & Reffert (2023) correctly isolate cluster members.
    Be stars are selected with PMP greater than 50%, some as low as 53 to 68%, so field contamination is possible; the cluster binary fraction depends on membership. See Appendix A.
  • domain assumption Götberg et al. (2018) stripped-star models constrain companion masses.
    Used to convert the fitted L and Teff of the hot components into masses (0.6 to 2.8 Msun); if these models are wrong, the 'high-mass sdOB' claim fails. See Section 6.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of AstroSat/UVIT Study of NGC 663: First detection of Be+sdOB systems in a young star cluster." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/PX2I56ZI

@misc{pith2026250608126,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: AstroSat/UVIT Study of NGC 663: First detection of Be+sdOB systems in a young star cluster},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/PX2I56ZI}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.08126}
}
read the original abstract

Be stars are rapidly rotating stars surrounded by a disc; however, the origin of these stars remains unclear. Mass and angular momentum transfer in close binaries account for the rapid rotation of a major fraction of Be stars, as supported by the previous detection of low-mass stripped companions to these stars. The stripped companions can be helium-burning subdwarf OB-type stars (sdOBs) and white dwarfs. The main objective of this study is to characterise the identified Be stars in the young open cluster NGC 663 and search for possible hot companions. We present the first ultraviolet (UV) photometric study of NGC 663 using far-UV and near-UV data from UVIT/AstroSat as a part of the UOCS series (XVIII). We identified 23 previously known Be stars in the cluster. Further, we utilised the spectral energy distribution fitting technique to derive the fundamental parameters and to search for UV-bright companions of the identified Be stars. Our study reveals that 19 out of 23 Be stars show a significant UV excess, indicating the presence of hot companions. Here, we report the first detection of high-mass sdOB companions to Be stars, with 69.5% of them found in binaries within a cluster, offering direct evidence of binary interactions. This study showcases the key role of binary interactions in the formation of Be stars in clusters and provides insights into massive star evolution.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.08126 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Upper panel: Single-fit SED of Be star GG 95, with the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. HR diagram illustrating UVIT-identified Be stars and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 40 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archiveprefix author booktitle chapter edition editor howpublished institution eprint journal key month note number organization pages publisher school series title type volume year label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts #0 'before.all := #1 ...

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 global.max substring 't := if while FUNCTION word.in bbl.in " " * FUNCTION format....

  3. [3]

    S., Santos, J

    Angelo, M. S., Santos, J. F. C., Maia, F. F. S., & Corradi, W. J. B. 2022, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 510, 5695

    work page 2022

  4. [4]

    M., Sip o cz , B

    Astropy Collaboration , Price-Whelan , A. M., Sip o cz , B. M., et al. 2018, , 156, 123

    2018

  5. [5]

    2008, , 492, 277

    Bayo , A., Rodrigo , C., Barrado Y Navascu \'e s , D., et al. 2008, , 492, 277

    work page 2008

  6. [6]

    2020, , 641, A42

    Bodensteiner , J., Shenar , T., & Sana , H. 2020, , 641, A42

    work page 2020

  7. [7]

    & Kurucz , R

    Castelli , F. & Kurucz , R. L. 2003, in IAU Symposium, Vol. 210, Modelling of Stellar Atmospheres, ed. N. Piskunov , W. W. Weiss , & D. F. Gray , A20

    2003

  8. [8]

    2024, , 167, 12

    Cavallo , L., Spina , L., Carraro , G., et al. 2024, , 167, 12

    work page 2024

Show all 54 references
  1. [9]

    2016, , 823, 102

    Choi , J., Dotter , A., Conroy , C., et al. 2016, , 823, 102

    2016

  2. [10]

    2024, , 532, 1547

    Cordoni , G., Casagrande , L., Yu , J., et al. 2024, , 532, 1547

    2024

  3. [11]

    E., Langer , N., Izzard , R

    de Mink , S. E., Langer , N., Izzard , R. G., Sana , H., & de Koter , A. 2013, , 764, 166

    2013

  4. [12]

    E., Sana , H., Langer , N., Izzard , R

    de Mink , S. E., Sana , H., Langer , N., Izzard , R. G., & Schneider , F. R. N. 2014, , 782, 7

    2014

  5. [13]

    S., Monteiro , H., Moitinho , A., et al

    Dias , W. S., Monteiro , H., Moitinho , A., et al. 2021, , 504, 356

    2021

  6. [14]

    2022, VizieR Online Data Catalog: Gaia DR3 Part 1

    Gaia Collaboration . 2022, VizieR Online Data Catalog: Gaia DR3 Part 1. Main source (Gaia Collaboration, 2022), VizieR On-line Data Catalog: I/355, originally published in: A&A, 674, A1 (2023)

    2023

  7. [15]

    Goraya , P. S. 1986, , 222, 121

    1986

  8. [16]

    E., Groh , J

    G \"o tberg , Y., de Mink , S. E., Groh , J. H., et al. 2018, , 615, A78

    2018

  9. [17]

    E., Sigut , T

    Granada , A., Jones , C. E., Sigut , T. A. A., et al. 2018, , 155, 50

    2018

  10. [18]

    Hall , J. C. 2008, Living Reviews in Solar Physics, 5, 2

    2008

  11. [19]

    Hunt , E. L. & Reffert , S. 2023, VizieR Online Data Catalog: Improving the open cluster census. II. (Hunt+, 2023) , VizieR On-line Data Catalog: J/A+A/673/A114. Originally published in: 2023A&A...673A.114H

    2023

  12. [20]

    Hunter, J. D. 2007, Computing in Science & Engineering, 9, 90

    2007

  13. [21]

    2022, , 940, 86

    Klement , R., Baade , D., Rivinius , T., et al. 2022, , 940, 86

    2022

  14. [22]

    S., Diaz , M

    Levenhagen , R. S., Diaz , M. P., Coelho , P. R. T., & Hubeny , I. 2017, , 231, 1

    2017

  15. [23]

    Mathew , B., Subramaniam , A., & Bhatt , B. C. 2008, , 388, 1879

    2008

  16. [24]

    Millman, K. J. & Aivazis, M. 2011, Computing in Science & Engineering, 13, 9

    2011

  17. [25]

    Oliphant, T. E. 2007, Computing in Science & Engineering, 9, 10

    2007

  18. [26]

    2010, , 517, A32

    Paunzen , E., Heiter , U., Netopil , M., & Soubiran , C. 2010, , 517, A32

    2010

  19. [27]

    Peters , G. J. 1976, in IAU Symposium, Vol. 70, Be and Shell Stars, ed. A. Slettebak , 69

    1976

  20. [28]

    J., Gies , D

    Peters , G. J., Gies , D. R., Grundstrom , E. D., & McSwain , M. V. 2008, , 686, 1280

    2008

  21. [29]

    J., Pewett , T

    Peters , G. J., Pewett , T. D., Gies , D. R., Touhami , Y. N., & Grundstrom , E. D. 2013, , 765, 2

    2013

  22. [30]

    J., Wang , L., Gies , D

    Peters , G. J., Wang , L., Gies , D. R., & Grundstrom , E. D. 2016, , 828, 47

    2016

  23. [31]

    2001 a , , 376, 144

    Pigulski , A., Kopacki , G., & Ko aczkowski , Z. 2001 a , , 376, 144

    2001

  24. [32]

    2001 b , VizieR Online Data Catalog, J/A+A/376/144

    Pigulski , A., Kopacki , G., & Kolaczkowski , Z. 2001 b , VizieR Online Data Catalog, J/A+A/376/144

    2001

  25. [33]

    , Kopacki, G

    Pigulski, A. , Kopacki, G. , & Kolaczkowski, Z. 2001, A&A, 376, 144

    2001

  26. [34]

    R., Cote , J., Waters , L

    Pols , O. R., Cote , J., Waters , L. B. F. M., & Heise , J. 1991, , 241, 419

    1991

  27. [35]

    Postma , J. E. & Leahy , D. 2017, , 129, 115002

    2017

  28. [36]

    2021, , 923, 162

    Rani , S., Pandey , G., Subramaniam , A., et al. 2021, , 923, 162

    2021

  29. [37]

    & Deetjen , J

    Rauch , T. & Deetjen , J. L. 2003, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 288, Stellar Atmosphere Modeling, ed. I. Hubeny , D. Mihalas , & K. Werner , 103

    2003

  30. [38]

    M., et al

    Rebassa-Mansergas , A., Solano , E., Jim \'e nez-Esteban , F. M., et al. 2021, , 506, 5201

    2021

  31. [39]

    C., & Martayan , C

    Rivinius , T., Carciofi , A. C., & Martayan , C. 2013, , 21, 69

    2013

  32. [40]

    1979, , 84, 1319

    Sanduleak , N. 1979, , 84, 1319

    1979

  33. [41]

    1990, , 100, 1239

    Sanduleak , N. 1990, , 100, 1239

    1990

  34. [42]

    & Li , X.-D

    Shao , Y. & Li , X.-D. 2014, , 796, 37

    2014

  35. [43]

    & Li , X.-D

    Shao , Y. & Li , X.-D. 2021, , 908, 67

    2021

  36. [44]

    Stetson , P. B. 1987, , 99, 191

    1987

  37. [45]

    N., Postma , J., Joseph , P., et al

    Tandon , S. N., Postma , J., Joseph , P., et al. 2020, , 159, 158

    2020

  38. [46]

    N., Subramaniam , A., Girish , V., et al

    Tandon , S. N., Subramaniam , A., Girish , V., et al. 2017, , 154, 128

    2017

  39. [47]

    2011, TOPCAT: Tool for OPerations on Catalogues And Tables , Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1101.010

    Taylor , M. 2011, TOPCAT: Tool for OPerations on Catalogues And Tables , Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1101.010

    2011

  40. [48]

    & Vanbeveren , D

    van Bever , J. & Vanbeveren , D. 1997, , 322, 116

    1997

  41. [49]

    C., & Varoquaux, G

    van der Walt, S., Colbert, S. C., & Varoquaux, G. 2011, Computing in Science & Engineering, 13, 22

    2011

  42. [50]

    R., Peters , G

    Wang , L., Gies , D. R., Peters , G. J., et al. 2021, , 161, 248

    2021

  43. [51]

    2010, in P roceedings of the 9th P ython in S cience C onference, ed

    W es M c K inney. 2010, in P roceedings of the 9th P ython in S cience C onference, ed. S t\'efan van der W alt & J arrod M illman, 56 -- 61

    2010

  44. [52]

    Whitford , A. E. 1958, , 63, 201

    1958

  45. [53]

    Yadav , R. K. S. & Sagar , R. 2001, , 328, 370

    2001

  46. [54]

    C., Lin , C

    Yu , P. C., Lin , C. C., Chen , W. P., et al. 2015, , 149, 43

    2015

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.