Scattering theory on Riemann surfaces II: The scattering matrix and generalized period mappings

Eric Schippers; Wolfgang Staubach

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 25 references

Scattering theory on Riemann surfaces II: The scattering matrix and generalized period mappings

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper establishes that the scattering of $L^2$ harmonic one-forms across a complex of quasicircles on a compact Riemann surface is governed by an explicit unitary matrix of Schiffer operators, and that the induced generalized period…

desk verdict Solid second part of a program whose headline results are genuinely new but imported from Part I; review conditionally with access to the companion. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.08166 v1 pith:PKDZYDLC submitted 2025-06-09 math.DG math.AGmath.CV

Eric Schippers , Wolfgang Staubach This is my paper

classification math.DGmath.AGmath.CV MSC 14F4030F1530F3035P9951M15

keywords scatteringtheoryharmonicone-formsRiemannsurfacesquasicirclesSchifferoperatorsperiodmappingsGrunskyinequalitiespolarizations

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper sets out to prove that harmonic one-forms on a Riemann surface scatter across a separating network of quasicircles without loss of information: the matrix relating the holomorphic and anti-holomorphic parts of the forms, together with the cohomological data, is unitary and is given explicitly by integral operators called Schiffer operators. If correct, the same machinery gives a generalized period map for bordered surfaces that is an isomorphism with norm strictly less than one, so its graph is a positive polarization in an infinite Siegel disk. That unifies the classical period matrix of compact algebraic curves with the infinite-dimensional period map of the universal Teichmüller space, and recovers Grunsky-type inequalities with cohomological corrections. The argument depends on adjoint, cohomology, and kernel/image identities for Schiffer operators proved in the companion Part I, and assumes the target piece $\Sigma_2$ is connected.

What carries the argument

The workhorse is the family of Schiffer comparison operators, $T_{\Sigma_j,\Sigma_k}\colon A(\Sigma_j)\to A(\Sigma_k)$, $\alpha\mapsto \iint_{\Sigma_j} L_R(\cdot,w)\wedge \alpha(w)$, and $S_{\Sigma_k}\colon A(\Sigma_k)\to A(R)$, $\alpha\mapsto \iint_{\Sigma_k} K_R(\cdot,w)\wedge \alpha(w)$, where $L_R$ and $K_R$ are the Schiffer and Bergman kernels obtained from Green's function of the compact surface $R$. These operators supply every block of the scattering matrix. The overfare operator $O_{\Sigma_1,\Sigma_2}$ transfers harmonic functions—and, through exact forms, one-forms—across the quasicircles by matching conformally nontangential boundary values; compatible triples fix the cohomological ambiguity with a catalyzing form $\zeta$ by requiring $\alpha_k-\zeta|_{\Sigma_k}$ to be exact and $S_1\alpha_1+S_2\alpha_2=\zeta$. The proofs decompose harmonic forms along holomorphic/anti-holomorphic parts and cohomology classes using the Part I identities, then use the isomorphism $\Theta(\gamma,\tau)=-T_{1,2}\gamma+R_2\tau$ and its inverse, the augmented overfare, to establish unitarity and to define $\Upsilon=P_{\mathrm{cap}}O_{\mathrm{aug}}\Theta$ with $\|\Upsilon\|<1$.

What would settle it

On a genus-one surface, cut a torus into a punctured torus and a disk by one quasicircle, take explicit basis forms, and compute the $3\times 3$ block matrix numerically from the Schiffer kernels; if the computed matrix deviates from unitarity beyond quadrature error, Theorem 3.24 is false. Alternatively, compute the norm of $\Upsilon$ for a two-cap surface and check whether it reaches $1$, which would contradict Theorem 4.3's uniform gap below one.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is a block-matrix equation for compatible triples. If $R$ is a compact surface of genus $g\neq 0$ cut into $\Sigma_1$ and $\Sigma_2$ by quasicircles, with $\Sigma_2$ connected, and $(\alpha_1+\beta_1,\alpha_2+\beta_2,\xi+\eta)$ is a compatible triple—meaning the two forms share boundary values across the cuts and are related by the catalyzing form $\zeta=\xi+\eta$ through exact overfare, with $S_1\alpha_1+S_2\alpha_2=\zeta$—then the anti-holomorphic parts $\beta_1,\beta_2$ and the holomorphic part $\xi$ of the catalyzing form are obtained by applying the $3\times 3$ block matrix with entries $-T_{1,1},-T_{2,1},R_1$; $-T_{1,2},-T_{2,2},R_2$; $S_1,S_2,0$ to $(\alpha_1,\alpha_2,\eta)$. The paper proves this matrix is unitary. In genus zero the same relation holds for the upper-left $2\times 2$ block. From this follows the generalized period map $\Upsilon\colon A(\Sigma_1)\oplus A(R)\to A(\Sigma_1)\oplus A(R)$, $\Upsilon(\gamma,\tau)=(-T_{1,1}\gamma+R_1\tau,S_1\gamma)$, which is an isomorphism onto the semi-exact holomorphic one-forms on $\Sigma_2$ with $\|\Upsilon\|<1$, and whose graph is the positive polarization $W=O_{\mathrm{aug}}A^{se}(\Sigma_2)$.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the companion Part I's identities for the Schiffer operators—their adjoints, their action on cohomology, and which subspaces they map into and onto—are all correct, together with the standing assumption that one of the two pieces, $\Sigma_2$, is connected; if any of these fails, the scattering matrix need not be unitary and the generalized period map need not be an isomorphism.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

A compatible triple of harmonic one-forms is exchanged losslessly: the unitary scattering relation means no $L^2$ information is created or destroyed when forms are overferred across the quasicircle interface.
The generalized period map $\Upsilon$ is an isomorphism onto the semi-exact holomorphic one-forms of the bordered surface and satisfies $\|\Upsilon\|<1$, so the positive polarization it defines is the graph of a contraction in an infinite Siegel disk.
Classical period matrices of compact surfaces and the infinite-dimensional period maps of the disk and universal Teichmüller space become special cases of a single construction; the same theorem yields Grunsky-type inequalities, including the genus-$g$, $n$-border version, with cohomological corrections.
Well-posedness of the holomorphic boundary value problem for semi-exact one-forms is characterized by membership of the data in $\operatorname{Im}(I-T_{1,1})$ when $\Sigma_2$ is connected, giving a concrete solvability criterion that accounts for cohomology.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

A natural next step, not taken in the paper, is to use the unitarity and conformal invariance to build a unitary action of the mapping class group on the boundary-value Hilbert space; the scattering matrix would then be a representation of the modular group.
The norm gap $1-\|\Upsilon\|$ is a plausible quantitative invariant of how far a bordered surface is from being compact; one could test numerically on explicit quasicircle families whether the gap is controlled by the quasicircle constant or by the maximal dilatation.
The paper leaves holomorphicity of the generalized period map as future work; a concrete check would be to verify in the genus-one, one-border example that $\Upsilon$ depends holomorphically on the sewing parameters, which would place the construction inside Teichmüller theory.
The condition $[\delta-R_1S_1\tau]\in\operatorname{Im}(I-T_{1,1})$ for solvability suggests that an index-theoretic count of obstructions could be associated to the holomorphic boundary value problem; computing that index for each genus and border count would extend the paper's results.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Two things to know before you read it. The headline results are new: an explicit three-by-three scattering matrix in Schiffer operators that is unitary (Theorems 3.24–3.25), and a generalized period map whose graph gives a positive polarization with operator norm strictly inside the Siegel disk (Theorems 4.2–4.3). The catch is that both claims are proved by direct appeal to the authors' companion Part I [21]; the paper says so, and the referee cannot check them from this text alone.

What is good. The paper is a clean, honest continuation of a program. The decomposition lemmas (3.18–3.20) are intricate but well-organized, and the compatibility-with-catalyzing-form setup justifies the scattering interpretation. Where the paper does compute, it checks out; I found only a minor typo in the proof of Theorem 3.24 ("T2,2α1" for "T2,2α2"). The generalized period map does unify the classical period matrix and the KYNS period map at the level of linear algebra, and the Grunsky inequalities come out as a special case. The literature is credited properly, including Shirazi and Radnell–Schippers–Staubach.

Soft spots, in proportion. The main one is dependence on Part I. If any of the cited theorems (3.21, 3.23, 3.24, 4.1, 4.7, 4.12, 4.16) has a sign error or a missing condition, both headline results fail. That is not a flaw in this paper per se, but it makes the review inherently conditional. The abstract's "unifies" language is stronger than what is proved: holomorphicity of the period map is explicitly deferred, so the unification is structural rather than analytic. The assumption that Σ2 is connected is load-bearing and is stated clearly. Nothing else internal looks wrong.

Who this is for: specialists in Teichmüller theory, conformal mapping, and boundary value problems. The paper deserves serious refereeing. Send it to review, but choose a referee who can also read Part I. If Part I holds up, this is a substantial contribution.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. This is the second part of a two-paper project on conformally invariant scattering of L2 harmonic one-forms on a compact Riemann surface R cut into two pieces Σ1 and Σ2 by a complex of quasicircles. The paper defines an overfare process for one-forms with cohomological data specified by a catalyzing form, introduces compatible triples, and derives an explicit block-matrix scattering matrix whose entries are Schiffer operators. It then states and proves that this matrix is unitary, and applies the machinery to construct a generalized period map whose graph gives a positive polarization in an infinite Siegel disk, with operator norm strictly less than one. The paper also derives a generalized Grunsky inequality and a well-posedness criterion for a holomorphic boundary value problem. The proofs of the main structural identities are explicitly delegated to the companion paper [21].

Significance. If the results are correct, the paper provides a genuinely unifying framework: it treats the classical polarization of a compact Riemann surface and the infinite-dimensional period map of universal Teichmüller space as special cases of a single construction based on boundary values of harmonic one-forms. The explicit form of the scattering matrix in terms of Schiffer operators is a clean and publishable contribution, and the conformal invariance of the construction is a definite strength. The paper contains no fitted parameters or ad hoc numerical inputs; the structure is entirely operator-theoretic. The main caveat is the extremely heavy reliance on the companion paper [21] for all workhorse identities: unitarity, surjectivity of Θ, the Schiffer-operator adjoint relations, and the kernel/image characterizations are all imported. This is appropriate for a declared Part II, but it means the present paper cannot be verified independently of [21].

major comments (2)

[Section 3.5, Theorem 3.24] The unitarity of the scattering matrix is a headline claim, but its proof is entirely external: the sentence 'This matrix is unitary. Unitarity follows from [21, Theorems 3.21, 3.23, 3.24]' is the whole argument. The displayed verification in the proof only checks the third row and one of the first two rows, and the second-row computation contains a variable typo: 'T2,2α1' should read 'T2,2α2', since it is obtained by applying T2,2 to the first equation of (3.11). Because a single sign error in one of the cited identities of [21] would propagate directly into the second row and into the norm computation in Theorem 4.3, the paper should either expand the nine block identities and show how each follows from the cited results, or include an appendix with the verification. As written, a reader of this paper alone cannot check the central unitary claim.
[Section 4.5, Theorem 4.7 proof, Eq. (4.18)] The displayed equality 'γ = PΣ1(δ−R1S1τ) = PΣ1δ' is not valid in general. Since PΣ1 is the identity on A(Σ1), applying it to both sides of δ−R1S1τ = (I−T1,1)γ gives PΣ1(δ−R1S1τ) = δ−R1S1τ, and this is not γ unless T1,1γ = 0. The subsequent estimate ∥γ∥ ≲ ∥δ∥ therefore does not follow from the preceding line. The continuous-dependence claim of Theorem 4.7 may be salvageable by proving separately that I−T1,1 has a bounded inverse on A(Σ1), but the proof as written contains a genuine false equality and needs repair.

minor comments (5)

[Lemma 3.19(1)] In part (1), the sentence 'there are γ2, ρ2 ∈ A(Σ1)' is inconsistent with the formula α1 = T2,1γ2 + R1S2τ2, since T2,1 acts on A(Σ2); it should read γ2, ρ2 ∈ A(Σ2).
[Lemma 3.19(2)] In part (2), the clause 'µ1, τ1 ∈ [R1A(R)]⊥' appears to be a typo for 'µ1, ν1 ∈ [R1A(R)]⊥'; also equation (3.8) writes 'S1ν1 + S1τ1 = ζ', but the lemma's data contain ξ, η and no ζ, so this should presumably be '= ξ'.
[Proof of Theorem 3.24] Besides the T2,2α1 typo, the second-row computation elides the cancellation of the term −γ2 with the identity for T2,2T2,2γ2; please display the intermediate step so the reader can verify the use of [21, Theorem 3.23].
[Section 2.8] The sentence 'We will sue the abbreviated notation' contains the typo 'sue'; it should be 'use'.
[Theorem 4.3] The statement 'there is a c < 1' after invoking the isomorphism Θ is slightly imprecise: an isomorphism gives a lower bound c0 > 0, and one then chooses c = min(c0, 1/2) to ensure c < 1; please phrase it this way.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the scattering matrix and period-map conclusions rest on external companion-paper theorems, not on the conclusions themselves.

full rationale

I walked the derivation chain from the compatible-triple definition through the scattering matrix (Theorem 3.24) and the generalized period map (Theorems 4.1–4.3). No step reduces to its own input by construction. The block-matrix equation (3.17) is derived from decomposition Lemma 3.19 and the previously established overfare and Schiffer-operator identities; the bottom-row equality is the compatibility condition, and the first two rows are obtained by algebraic manipulation of the decompositions. Unitarity is asserted by invoking [21, Theorems 3.21, 3.23, 3.24], and the surjectivity of Θ is imported from [21, Corollary 4.18]; these are genuine external mathematical results with stated assumptions rather than restatements of the present paper's target claims. There are no fitted parameters, no quantity is defined in terms of the object it is supposed to predict, and no uniqueness or period-map conclusion is assumed as a premise. The extensive self-citation of Part I is a dependence on prior work, not circularity, and a failure of any cited identity would be a correctness risk rather than a circular one.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 3 invented entities

No fitted numerical parameters: the paper is pure mathematics. The load-bearing inputs are standard Green's function and Sobolev theory, the authors' earlier analytic theory of overfare [19, 20], and, above all, the Schiffer operator calculus of the companion paper Part I [21], from which every workhorse lemma is imported. The new constructs (catalyzing forms, compatible triples, bridgeworthy forms, augmented overfare) are definitions introduced by the paper; their external anchors are the classical period map and the classical Grunsky inequalities, both recovered as special cases in Section 4.

assumptions (5)

standard math Existence, uniqueness and conformal invariance of Green's functions on compact and bordered Riemann surfaces (Section 2.5)
Standard results from Ahlfors-Sario [2] and Royden [15], used to define the Schiffer and Bergman kernels in Definition 2.26.
domain assumption Adjoint identities, cohomology interrelations, and kernel/image characterizations for Schiffer operators from Part I [21]
The workhorses of Sections 3.4 to 3.5 and Chapter 4, invoked at every step of the proofs of Theorems 3.19, 3.20, 3.24, 4.1, 4.3 and 4.7; e.g. [21, Theorems 3.21, 3.23, 3.24] give the unitarity identities. Proved in the authors' companion paper, not here.
domain assumption Well-posedness of the H^{-1/2} Dirichlet problem for L2 harmonic one-forms on finite-genus bordered surfaces
From [20, Theorem 3.25], used in Theorem 3.11 and Section 4.5 to assert existence of weakly compatible forms and to set up the holomorphic boundary value problem.
domain assumption Bounded overfare theorems for Dirichlet-bounded harmonic functions
Theorems 2.22 and 2.25 from [19]; boundedness requires Σ1 connected, or the quasicircles to be BZM, conditions inherited by all later statements.
domain assumption Identification of the boundary values of L2 harmonic one-forms with H^{-1/2}(Γ)
Theorem 2.17 from [20]; the basis for partial overfare of one-forms and for transferring boundary data across quasicircles.

invented entities (3)

Catalyzing form ζ independent evidence
purpose: A harmonic one-form on R specifying the cohomological data: α1 and α2 are compatible with respect to ζ when boundary values match, each αk differs from the restriction of ζ by an exact form, and S1^h α1 + S2^h α2 = ζ (Definitions 3.10 and 3.13).
Introduced in this paper; its usefulness is evidenced by the explicit unitary scattering matrix it enables and by the recovery of the classical period map and Grunsky inequalities in Chapter 4.
Bridgeworthy harmonic forms A_bw independent evidence
purpose: Characterizes the kernel of the harmonic projection S_k^h and the ambiguity in compatible triples: constant on each boundary component, with equal values on boundary curves bounding the same component of the other piece (Definition 3.17).
Used in Theorem 3.20 to pin down uniqueness of compatible forms and in the scattering matrix analysis of harmonic measures (3.20).
Augmented overfare map O_aug independent evidence
purpose: Maps a semi-exact harmonic one-form on Σ2 to its overfare together with the cohomology class in A_harm(R); its inverse Θ is the generalized period map (4.1), (4.2).
The construction that unifies the classical period matrix and the universal Teichmüller period map: the graph of Υ = Pcap O_aug Θ is the polarizing subspace W (Theorem 4.2).

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Scattering theory on Riemann surfaces II: The scattering matrix and generalized period mappings." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/PKDZYDLC

@misc{pith2026250608166,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Scattering theory on Riemann surfaces II: The scattering matrix and generalized period mappings},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/PKDZYDLC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.08166}
}

read the original abstract

We construct a scattering theory for harmonic one-forms on Riemann surfaces, obtained from boundary value problems involving systems of curves and the jump problem. We obtain an explicit expression for the scattering matrix in terms of integral operators which we call Schiffer operators, and show that the matrix is unitary. We also obtain a general association of positive polarizing Lagrangian spaces to bordered Riemann surfaces, which unifies the classical polarizations for compact surfaces of algebraic geometry with the infinite-dimensional period map of the universal Teichm\"uller space.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

25 extracted references · 22 canonical work pages

[21]

Scattering theory on Riemann surfaces I: Schiffer operators, cohomol- ogy, and index theorems

Schippers, E.; and Staubach, W. Scattering theory on Riemann surfaces I: Schiffer operators, cohomol- ogy, and index theorems. Accepted for publication in Communications in Contemporary Mathematics

work page
[1]

Ahlfors, L. V. The complex analytic structure of the space of closed Riemann surfaces, in Analytic Functions. Princeton University Press,1960

work page 1960
[2]

V.; Sario, L

Ahlfors, L. V.; Sario, L. Riemann surfaces. Princeton Mathematical Series, No. 26 Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J. 1960

work page 1960
[3]

Kernel functions and conformal mapping

Bergman, S.; and Schiffer, M. Kernel functions and conformal mapping. Compositio Math.8, (1951), 205–249

work page 1951
[4]

Linear partial differential operators

Hörmander, L. Linear partial differential operators. Springer Verlag, Berlin-New York, 1976

work page 1976
[5]

Besov spaces on closed subsets ofRn

Jonsson, A. Besov spaces on closed subsets ofRn. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.341no. 1, (1994), 355–370

work page 1994
[6]

Function spaces on subsets ofRn

Jonsson, A.; Wallin, H. Function spaces on subsets ofRn. - Math. Rep.2no. 1, 1984

work page 1984
[7]

A.; and Yuriev, D

Kirillov A. A.; and Yuriev, D. V. Representations of the Virasoro algebra by the orbit method, J. Geom. Phys.5(1988), no. 3, 351–363

work page 1988

Show all 25 references

[8]

A. A. Kirillov, and D. V. Yuri’ev, Kähler geometry of the infinite-dimensional homogeneous space M= Diff +(S1)/rot(S1), Funktsional. Anal. i Prilozhen.21(1987) no. 4, 35–46

1987
[9]

Teichmüller theory and the universal period mapping via quantum calculus and theH 1/2 space on the circle

Nag, S.; Sullivan, D. Teichmüller theory and the universal period mapping via quantum calculus and theH 1/2 space on the circle. Osaka J. Math.32(1995), no. 1, 1–34

1995
[10]

V., Jr.; Yulmukhametov, R

Napalkov, V. V., Jr.; Yulmukhametov, R. S. On the Hilbert transform in the Bergman space. (Russian) Mat. Zametki70(2001), no. 1, 68–78; translation in Math. Notes70(2001), no. 1-2, 61–70

2001
[11]

and Schippers, E

Radnell, D. and Schippers, E. Quasisymmetric sewing in rigged Teichmüller space, Commun. Contemp. Math.8(2006), no. 4, 481–534

2006
[12]

A Model of the Teichmüller space of genus-zero bordered surfaces by period maps

Radnell, D.; Schippers, E.; and Staubach, W. A Model of the Teichmüller space of genus-zero bordered surfaces by period maps. Conform. Geom. Dyn.23(2019), 32-–51

2019
[13]

Dirichlet spaces of domains bounded by quasicircles, Commun

Radnell, D.; Schippers, E.; and Staubach, W. Dirichlet spaces of domains bounded by quasicircles, Commun. Contemp. Math.22(2020), no. 3

2020
[14]

Theorie der Abelschen Functionen, J

Riemann, B. Theorie der Abelschen Functionen, J. Reine Angew. Math.,54(1857), pp. 115–155; Werke, pp. 88-142
[15]

Royden, H. L. Function theory on compact Riemann surfaces. J. Analyse Math.18, (1967), 295–327

1967
[16]

Riemann boundary value problem on quasidisks, Faber isomorphism and Grunsky operator

Schippers, E.; Staubach, W. Riemann boundary value problem on quasidisks, Faber isomorphism and Grunsky operator. Complex Anal. Oper. Theory12(2018), no. 2, 325–354

2018
[17]

Analysis on quasicircles — A unified approach through transmission and jump problems

Schippers, E.; and Staubach, W. Analysis on quasicircles — A unified approach through transmission and jump problems. EMS Surv. Math. Sci.9(2022), no.1, 31—97

2022
[18]

A scattering theory of harmonic one-forms on Riemann surfaces

Schippers, E; and Staubach, W. A scattering theory of harmonic one-forms on Riemann surfaces. arXiv:2112.00835v1

arXiv
[19]

Overfare of harmonic functions on Riemann surfaces

Schippers, E.; and Staubach, W. Overfare of harmonic functions on Riemann surfaces. New York J. Math.31(2025) 321–367

2025
[20]

Overfare of harmonic one-forms on Riemann surfaces

Schippers, E.; and Staubach, W. Overfare of harmonic one-forms on Riemann surfaces. New York J. Math.30(2024) 1437–1478

2024
[22]

and Staubach, W

Schippers, E., Shirazi, M. and Staubach, W. Schiffer comparison operators and approximations on Riemann surfaces bordered by quasicircles, J. Geom. Anal.31(2021), no. 6, 5877—5908

2021
[23]

Faber and Grunsky Operators on Bordered Riemann Surfaces of Arbitrary Genus and the Schiffer Isomorphism"

Shirazi, M. Faber and Grunsky Operators on Bordered Riemann Surfaces of Arbitrary Genus and the Schiffer Isomorphism". PhD Dissertation, University of Manitoba 2020

2020
[24]

Faber and Grunsky Operators Corresponding to Bordered Riemann Surfaces, Conform

Shirazi, M. Faber and Grunsky Operators Corresponding to Bordered Riemann Surfaces, Conform. Geom. Dyn.24(2020), 177–201

2020
[25]

Weil-Petersson Metric on the Universal Teichmüller Space, Memoirs of the American Mathematical Society.183(2006) no

Takhtajan, L.; Teo, L-P. Weil-Petersson Metric on the Universal Teichmüller Space, Memoirs of the American Mathematical Society.183(2006) no. 861. 43 Glossary A:Bergman space. 6 Abw:bridgeworthy harmonic oneforms. 22 Aharm:Harmonic Bergman space. 6 Ahm:Complex linear span of h...

2006

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [21]

Scattering theory on Riemann surfaces I: Schiffer operators, cohomol- ogy, and index theorems

Schippers, E.; and Staubach, W. Scattering theory on Riemann surfaces I: Schiffer operators, cohomol- ogy, and index theorems. Accepted for publication in Communications in Contemporary Mathematics

work page

[2] [1]

Ahlfors, L. V. The complex analytic structure of the space of closed Riemann surfaces, in Analytic Functions. Princeton University Press,1960

work page 1960

[3] [2]

V.; Sario, L

Ahlfors, L. V.; Sario, L. Riemann surfaces. Princeton Mathematical Series, No. 26 Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J. 1960

work page 1960

[4] [3]

Kernel functions and conformal mapping

Bergman, S.; and Schiffer, M. Kernel functions and conformal mapping. Compositio Math.8, (1951), 205–249

work page 1951

[5] [4]

Linear partial differential operators

Hörmander, L. Linear partial differential operators. Springer Verlag, Berlin-New York, 1976

work page 1976

[6] [5]

Besov spaces on closed subsets ofRn

Jonsson, A. Besov spaces on closed subsets ofRn. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.341no. 1, (1994), 355–370

work page 1994

[7] [6]

Function spaces on subsets ofRn

Jonsson, A.; Wallin, H. Function spaces on subsets ofRn. - Math. Rep.2no. 1, 1984

work page 1984

[8] [7]

A.; and Yuriev, D

Kirillov A. A.; and Yuriev, D. V. Representations of the Virasoro algebra by the orbit method, J. Geom. Phys.5(1988), no. 3, 351–363

work page 1988