Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 130 references

Precise Age For The Binary HD 21278 In The Young Alpha Persei Cluster

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Precise masses for the HD 21278 binary pin the Alpha Persei cluster at $49 \pm 7$ Myr and put new pressure on the idea that single stars near $8\,M_\odot$ produce Chandrasekhar-mass white dwarfs.

desk verdict The binary mass measurement is solid, but the paper's age claim is undercut by internal inconsistencies and an appendix that implies a different age. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.08241 v1 pith:W2AP24ER submitted 2025-06-09 astro-ph.SR astro-ph.GA

Christopher A. Danner , Eric L. Sandquist , Gail H. Schaefer , Luigi R. Bedin , Christopher D. Farrington , Cyprien Lanthermann , Stefan Kraus , Robert Klement
show 9 more authors
Narsireddy Anugu John D. Monnier Jerome A. Orosz Isabelle Codron Tyler Gardner Mayra Gutierrez Benjamin R. Setterholm Jeremy Jones Becky Flores
This is my paper
classification astro-ph.SRastro-ph.GA
keywords alphaPerseiclusteropenagesspectroscopicbinariesstellarinterferometrymasseswhitedwarfinitial-finalmassrelationChandrasekharisochronefitting
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper uses the double-lined binary HD 21278 to set the age of the young $\alpha$ Persei open cluster. By combining radial velocities with orbit-resolved interferometry, the authors measure the two component masses as $5.381$ and $3.353$ $M_\odot$, then fit stellar isochrones to those masses and the infrared photometry. The resulting cluster age is $49 \pm 7$ Myr for PARSEC models and $49.5 \pm 6$ Myr for MIST models, notably younger than several previous estimates. If this age is right, two massive white dwarfs that appear to have escaped the cluster would have had quite massive progenitors, weakening the case that single stars near $8\,M_\odot$ end their lives as Chandrasekhar-mass white dwarfs.

What carries the argument

The machinery is the binary itself used as an isochrone clock. Radial-velocity broadening functions extract velocities from blended spectra, long-baseline interferometry resolves the roughly 2 milliarcsecond orbit and gives the inclination and flux ratios, and a Keplerian fit turns those into component masses. The paper then compares the two stars' infrared color-magnitude positions with rotating PARSEC and MIST isochrones, using the more massive, slowly rotating primary as the age-sensitive point because it is close to leaving the main sequence.

What would settle it

Detect past mass transfer in HD 21278 (for example, CNO-cycle processed material on the primary's surface, or a measurably changing orbital period) and the single-star isochrone comparison would be invalidated. A cleaner check is to resolve the primary's radius and effective temperature with longer-baseline interferometry and ask whether they land on the 49 Myr PARSEC/MIST track at $5.38\,M_\odot$; a clear miss would falsify the age assignment.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that the age of $\alpha$ Persei can be pinned down by its most massive still-main-sequence binary. HD 21278's two stars are measured by a combined Keplerian fit to radial velocities and interferometric sky positions: masses $5.381 \pm 0.084$ and $3.353 \pm 0.064$ $M_\odot$, in a 21.685-day eccentric orbit at an inclination of $148.938^\circ$. Placing those masses on PARSEC and MIST isochrones yields a cluster age of $49 \pm 7$ Myr or $49.5 \pm 6$ Myr, with systematic uncertainties of about 3 Myr from rotational mixing and convective overshoot. Reapplying that younger age to three candidate white-dwarf escapees changes their inferred progenitor masses (about $8.4$ and $7.4$ $M_\odot$ for the two viable candidates) and brings one $1.2\,M_\odot$ white dwarf into conflict with the cluster cooling-age budget, so the paper argues that single stars near $8\,M_\odot$ may not produce Chandrasekhar-mass white dwarfs.

Load-bearing premise

Both stars in HD 21278 evolved as isolated single stars despite past tidal interaction, so their masses and luminosities can be compared to single-star isochrones; if the pair exchanged mass earlier, the derived cluster age would be invalid.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The cluster is younger than the 77--81 Myr ages from lithium-depletion and kinematic methods, so membership-based evolutionary statements about $\alpha$ Persei would need to be recast to a roughly 49--51 Myr timescale.
  • The two viable white-dwarf escapees receive initial masses near $8.4$ and $7.4$ $M_\odot$, which extends the white dwarf initial-final mass relation steeply toward the supernova boundary.
  • The $1.20\,M_\odot$ white dwarf is probably not a cluster escapee: its $45 \pm 4$ Myr cooling time together with the new age leaves almost no time for a progenitor to have lived.
  • If single stars of $7$--$8.5$ $M_\odot$ make white dwarfs below the Chandrasekhar limit, then ultramassive white dwarfs near $1.2$--$1.3$ $M_\odot$ require either a different formation channel or a sharp change of slope in the initial-final mass relation just above this mass range.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable consequence the paper does not state is that field white dwarfs near $1.2$--$1.3$ $M_\odot$ should increasingly show merger signatures (fast rotation, magnetic fields, or unusual kinematics) if the single-star channel near $8\,M_\odot$ is closed.
  • The age gap with the lithium depletion boundary could be narrowed by searching for magnetic activity and spotting among the cluster's low-mass members; if the LDB clock runs systematically high in young clusters, the two methods would converge.
  • Applying the same binary-mass-plus-isochrone technique to other young clusters with resolved massive binaries could map the high-mass end of the initial-final mass relation without leaning on cluster turnoff ages.
  • A direct test of the single-star assumption would be a search for orbital period change or surface abundance anomalies in HD 21278; neither is claimed in the paper, but either would overturn the age if found.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper reports a combined spectroscopic and interferometric orbital solution for the double-lined binary HD 21278 in the alpha Persei cluster. New FIES/NOT spectra, archival KPNO, Narval, and HERMES spectra, and CHARA/PTI interferometric visibilities and closure phases are fitted with a thirteen-parameter Keplerian model, yielding component masses of about 5.38 and 3.35 Msun. The masses are then placed on 2MASS color-magnitude diagrams and compared to PARSEC and MIST isochrones to derive a cluster age of about 49-49.5 Myr, with the conclusion quoting 51 Myr. The paper also revisits the initial masses of three candidate massive white dwarf escapees from alpha Persei and argues that the inferred initial-final mass relation challenges the idea that single stars near 8 Msun produce Chandrasekhar-mass white dwarfs. An appendix presents independent SED fits for cluster B stars, including HD 21278 A.

Significance. If the derived age and masses are correct, this is a valuable anchor for the alpha Persei cluster age and a rare, precise probe of the high-mass end of the white dwarf initial-final mass relation. The paper's strengths include a direct Keplerian fit to independent radial-velocity and interferometric data, a Monte Carlo treatment of photometric uncertainties, publicly listed radial velocities and nightly positions, and external comparison with two modern isochrone sets. The central claims are, however, currently undermined by internal inconsistencies between the abstract/body and the conclusion, by an unresolved conflict between the Section 4.1 isochrone age and the Appendix A SED age for the same star, and by a contradictory statement about whether the Narval/Melchior radial velocities were included in the final fit. These issues must be reconciled before the paper's quantitative conclusions can be accepted.

major comments (4)
  1. [4.1 and Appendix A] The paper presents two mutually inconsistent ages for HD 21278 A. Section 4.1 reports 49 +/- 7 Myr (PARSEC) and 49.5 +/- 6 Myr (MIST) from the 2MASS CAMD positions of both components, while Appendix A's independent SED fit gives Teff = 16410 K and R = 3.75 +/- 0.09 Rsun for the primary and states that 'an age of about 61 Myr is implied' with PARSEC models at the same rotation parameter omega = 0.2. The 12 Myr offset is about 1.7 times the quoted 7 Myr uncertainty and lies in the direction of the 79 Myr lithium depletion boundary age that the paper argues against. Because HD 21278 A is the most evolved and most age-sensitive star used in the fit, this disagreement must be resolved quantitatively; the resolution could involve the photometric flux decomposition, the adopted reddening, or the single-star isochrone assumption.
  2. [Abstract, Section 3, and Section 5] The final adopted parameters are not uniquely specified. The abstract and Section 3 quote masses 5.381 +/- 0.084 and 3.353 +/- 0.064 Msun, with ages 49 +/- 7 Myr (PARSEC) and 49.5 +/- 6 Myr (MIST), whereas the conclusion quotes masses 5.348 +/- 0.085 and 3.331 +/- 0.062 Msun and ages 51 +/- 7 Myr and 51 +/- 6 Myr. The conclusion says these are the final values, but the isochrone analysis in Section 4.1 is based on the earlier mass values and the paper does not explain which fit produced the conclusion or why the ages shifted by 2 Myr. The reader cannot determine the paper's actual headline result from the text as written.
  3. [Section 3 and Figure 4] The treatment of the Narval and Melchior radial velocities is contradictory. The text in Section 3 says these measurements 'were not included in the final fit' because they sit near velocity crossings and their low uncertainties were pulling the solution, but the caption of Figure 4 states that the Narval and Melchior measurements are included in the best-fit curve. Since the paper identifies the radial velocities as the largest source of mass uncertainty, this is not a cosmetic point; the authors should state definitively whether these data are in the final fit and, if they are excluded, provide a quantitative comparison of fits with and without them.
  4. [Section 4] The age derivation assumes that both components of HD 21278 evolved as single stars despite the paper's own statement that 'the stars had some tidal interaction that slowed their rotation compared to other alpha Per B-type stars' and that 'we will treat them as having evolved as single stars in the remainder of the paper.' This assumption is load-bearing because any significant pre-main-sequence or main-sequence mass transfer would make the current masses and luminosities inconsistent with single-star isochrones. The manuscript should provide a quantitative check based on the current orbital separation, Roche-lobe geometry, and tidal synchronization timescales, or explicitly identify the observational constraints that rule out substantial mass exchange.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 4.2 and Section 5] The WD 1 exclusion argument contains inconsistent arithmetic. Section 4.2 says the 45 +/- 4 Myr cooling time combined with the 51 +/- 7 Myr cluster age gives the progenitor 'at max a 17 Myr lifespan,' but 51 - 45 = 6 Myr; the conclusion instead says the progenitor had only 13 Myr before leaving the main sequence. Please recompute and quote the correct value.
  2. [References] The reference for the PARSEC models is cited as 'Nguyen, C. T., & et al. 2022' with an incomplete author list; please provide the full citation or a proper abbreviated format.
  3. [Table 7 and Section 2.1] Table 7 lists HD 21278 A as B3V with Teff = 16410 K, while the text in Section 2.1 says the primary is 'most likely a B5 star'; please reconcile the spectral type classification.
  4. [Section 1 and 2.1] There is a typo in 'photometic' in the introduction, and the text in Section 2.1 says 'Narval spectra' while elsewhere the instrument is called 'Narval'; please standardize the spelling.
  5. [Figure 9] The caption for the right panel of Figure 9 states that the MIST isochrone uses omega = 0.4 because a model with omega = 0.2 is unavailable, but the text in Section 4.1 says the MIST age was obtained by interpolating between omega = 0.0 and omega = 0.4; please clarify whether the plotted isochrone or the interpolated value is used for the quoted 49.5 Myr age.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: component masses come from independent Keplerian fits, and the cluster age is read from external PARSEC/MIST isochrones; the Appendix A SED tension is a consistency issue, not a circular step.

full rationale

The central derivation chain is not circular. The component masses (5.381 ± 0.084 and 3.353 ± 0.064 Msun) are obtained from a simultaneous fit to independent radial-velocity and interferometric data (Section 3), with no isochrone input. The cluster age is then derived by comparing the components' 2MASS CAMD positions to external PARSEC v2 and MIST isochrones (Section 4.1), using the measured flux ratios and distance; the masses constrain which isochrone points are compared but are not themselves outputs of the isochrones. The white-dwarf initial masses in Section 4.2 are inferred from the same external isochrones using the measured final white-dwarf masses and cooling times from Miller et al. (2022); this is a model-dependent inference, not a fit to the conclusion. Self-citations (Lam et al. 2023, Morales et al. 2022) supply comparison IFMR points only and are not load-bearing for the age or the 7-8.5 Msun Chandrasekhar-mass claim. The Appendix A SED fit implying about 61 Myr for HD 21278A is in tension with the 49 ± 7 Myr headline age, and the body/conclusion masses and ages differ slightly; these are internal-consistency and correctness concerns, but they do not constitute a circular reduction of any derived quantity to its inputs. The paper also states the single-star evolution assumption for the binary and flags the unknown WD progenitor rotation as a source of uncertainty, both of which are stated limitations rather than circular steps.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central age claim depends on the single-star evolution assumption, the choice of isochrone models and rotation rate, and the assumed cluster membership and reddening. None of these are independently derived in this paper; they are inputs from prior literature or modeling choices.

free parameters (3)
  • Primary star rotation rate omega in PARSEC isochrones = 0.2
    Chosen as 'most appropriate' in Section 4.1; the paper estimates a ~2 Myr age shift between omega=0 and omega=0.4, so this choice directly affects the quoted age.
  • Reddening E(B-V) for HD 21278 = 0.076 (Table 7)
    Derived from SED fitting in Appendix A and used for the binary's extinction correction; the paper notes using this instead of STILISM reddening changes the age by 1-2 Myr.
  • RV and interferometric uncertainty scaling factors = not specified
    Uncertainties for KPNO and NOT RVs were scaled to yield reduced chi2=1 (Section 2.1); the same was done separately for each interferometric beam combiner (Section 2.2). These scalings affect parameter uncertainties but not the best-fit values.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption HD 21278 components have evolved as single stars, with no significant mass transfer or tidal disruption of their internal evolution.
    Section 4 states this assumption explicitly. If false, isochrone ages from the binary components would not represent the cluster age.
  • domain assumption PARSEC and MIST isochrones accurately model the evolution of these B-type stars at the assumed metallicity and rotation.
    Section 4.1 uses these models to derive the age; model physics (overshoot, rotation treatment) contribute a quoted systematic uncertainty of ~3 Myr.
  • domain assumption The cluster is a single-age stellar population and HD 21278 is a coeval member.
    Membership is taken from Boyle & Bouma (2023); the age is assigned to the whole cluster from one binary.
  • domain assumption The Milky Way extinction law of Cardelli et al. (1989) and the STILISM reddening map are adequate for dereddening cluster members.
    Section 4.1 converts photometry to absolute magnitudes using these; the paper uses a different reddening for HD 21278 from SED fits.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Precise Age For The Binary HD 21278 In The Young Alpha Persei Cluster." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/W2AP24ER

@misc{pith2026250608241,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Precise Age For The Binary HD 21278 In The Young Alpha Persei Cluster},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/W2AP24ER}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.08241}
}
abstract

We present a study of the double-lined spectroscopic binary HD 21278 that contains one of the brightest main sequence stars in the young $\alpha$ Persei open cluster. We analyzed new spectra and reanalyzed archived spectra to measure precise new radial velocity curves for the binary. We also obtained interferometric data using the CHARA Array at Mount Wilson to measure the sky positions of the two stars and the inclination of the $\sim$ 2 milliarcsecond orbit. We determine that the two stars have masses of $5.381 \pm 0.084 M_{\odot}$ and $3.353 \pm 0.064 M_{\odot}$. From isochrone fits, we find the cluster's age to be $49 \pm 7$ Myr (using PARSEC models) or $49.5 \pm 6$ Myr (MIST models). Finally, we revisit the massive white dwarfs that are candidate escapees from the $\alpha$ Persei cluster to try to better characterize the massive end of the white dwarf initial-final mass relation. The implied progenitor masses challenge the idea that Chandrasekhar-mass white dwarfs are made by single stars with masses near $8 \msun$.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.08241 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Broadening functions for KPNO spectra. The red dashed line is the rotational fit for the primary star, the gold dashed line is the rotational fit for the secondary star, the blue dashed line is the combined fit, and the black line is the measured broadening function. we obtained satisfactory results using the same 14000 K synthetic spectrum for both stars. The disentangled average spectra are shown in [PITH_FULL_IM… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Broadening functions for the FIES spectra. The line meanings are the same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Disentangled spectra of the HD 21278 binary for the primary star (top panel) and secondary star (bottom panel). The He I 4387 and 4471 ˚A absorption lines, and the Mg II 4481 ˚A absorption line are the most prominent features [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (16 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Top: Radial velocity measurements from KPNO (cyan and pink) and NOT (blue and red) spectra versus orbital phase, and best-fit curve. Radial velocity measurements from Narval (Petit et al. 2014) and Melchior (Royer et al. 2024) are included (green and brown) in the best…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Squared visibilities versus spatial frequency for MIRC-X observations and predictions of the best-fit model (black dots), separated by mJD of observation. For clarity, only observations taken at one epoch are shown for each night. Observations are separated by telescop…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Closure phase versus spatial frequency for MIRC-X observations and predictions of the best-fit model (black dots), separated by mJD of observation. The plotted spatial frequency is obtained by summing for two of the three baselines. For clarity, only observations taken…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Sky plane orbit for HD 21278 B relative to HD 21278 A. The white circles show the model positions at the time of the CLIMB observations, while blue points are model positions at the time of MIRC-X and MYSTIC observations. Green points show model positions for PTI. The …
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Left: CMD of the α Persei cluster using 2MASS photometry cross￾referenced with Boyle & Bouma (2023) membership information. HD21278 (red), the primary star (green), and secondary star (magenta) are shown. Right: CMD of α Persei using Gaia DR3 photometry. each source of…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Left: Comparison of a PARSEC isochrone (age 49 Myr, ω=0.2) with the 2MASS CAMD of α Persei. The uncertainty ellipses for the primary and secondary star positions are shown, along with isochrone predictions for their masses (and 1σ uncertainties). Right: Same, but for a…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Comparison of best-fit isochrones and the α Per CMD using Gaia DR3 data from Boyle & Bouma (2023). The MIST isochrone (red) uses ω = 0.4, and an empirical isochrone (Rottensteiner & Meingast 2024) is also overlaid in green [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: The initial-final mass relation for white dwarfs from measurements in open clusters. α Persei measurements are from this work and have been highlighted via the red box. Sources for data on other cluster WDs are: Pleiades, Heyl et al. (2022); ”young clusters”, Richer e…
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Measured reddening E(B − V ) for α Per B stars versus sky position. 21238, which indicates that the (H − Ks) colors are close and also consistent within the measurement uncertainties. The two stars are relatively close together in the cluster, with lower reddening tha…
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Color-apparent magnitude (left) and dereddened color – absolute magnitude diagrams for α Per B stars. Color coding corresponds to projected rotation speed vrot sin i. ”A” is the inferred position of HD 21278 A after subtraction of the flux contribution of the secondar…
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Spectral energy distribution for HD 21238. The green curve is the Gaia BP/RP spectrum, yellow points are photometric measurements, the black and red dotted lines are the unreddened and reddened ATLAS9 models, and red dots are the model predictions for the observed mag…
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Spectral energy distribution for HD 21278 A. Points and lines have the same meaning as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_15.png]
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Spectral energy distribution for the Be star ψ Per. Points and lines have the same meaning as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_16.png]
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: Radius versus temperature for B-type stars in α Per. Color coding corresponds to projected rotation speed vrot sin i. For the Be stars, the fit using a single temperature photosphere is connected with the characteristics inferred from rotating models. Known binaries w…
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: Squared visibilities versus spatial frequency for MYSTIC observations and predictions of the best-fit model (black dots), separated by mJD of observation. To reduce clutter, only observations taken at one epoch were used for each night. Observations are separated by t…
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: Closure phase versus spatial frequency for MYSTIC observations and predictions of the best-fit model (black dots), separated by mJD of observation. The spatial frequency is obtained by taking the sum of the two baselines and dividing by the wavelength data. To reduce …

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

130 extracted references · 25 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archivePrefix author booktitle chapter doi edition editor eprint howpublished institution journal key month number organization pages publisher school series title misctitle type volume year version url label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts ...

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION format.url url empty "" new.block "" url * "" * if FUNCTION format.eprint eprint empty "" archivePrefix empty "" archivePrefix "arXiv" = new.block " " eprint * " " * new.block " " eprint * " " * if if if FUNCTION format.doi doi empty "" " " doi * " " * if FUNCTION format.pid doi empty eprint empty ur...

  3. [3]

    Vg TV2 ` ???U zMNкukp D J ˏ` x ̙3yי4iR> L20 X

    thebibliography [1] 20pt to REFERENCES 6pt =0pt -12pt 10pt plus 3pt =0pt =0pt =1pt plus 1pt =0pt =0pt -12pt =13pt plus 1pt =20pt =13pt plus 1pt \@M =10000 =-1.0em =0pt =0pt 0pt =0pt =1.0em @enumiv\@empty 10000 10000 `\.\@m \@noitemerr \@latex@warning Empty `thebibliography' environment \@ifnextchar \@reference \@latexerr Missing key on reference command E...

    arXiv 2021

  4. [4]

    Abt , H. A. 1970, , 19, 387, 10.1086/190215

    work page doi:10.1086/190215 1970

  5. [5]

    A., & Levy , S

    Abt , H. A., & Levy , S. G. 1978, , 36, 241, 10.1086/190498

    doi:10.1086/190498 1978

  6. [6]

    J., Curtis , J

    Andrews , J. J., Curtis , J. L., Chanam \'e , J., et al. 2022, , 163, 275, 10.3847/1538-3881/ac6952

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ac6952 2022

  7. [7]

    D., et al

    Anugu , N., Le Bouquin , J.-B., Monnier , J. D., et al. 2020 a , , 160, 158, 10.3847/1538-3881/aba957

    doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aba957 2020

  8. [8]

    2020 b , MIRCX\_Pipeline

    Anugu , N., Le Bouquin , J.-B., Monnier , J., et al. 2020 b , MIRCX\_Pipeline. https://gitlab.chara.gsu.edu/lebouquj/mircx_pipeline.git

    2020

Show all 130 references
  1. [9]

    1976, ApJ, 210, 642

    Avni , Y. 1976, ApJ, 210, 642

    1976

  2. [11]

    2021 b , , 161, 147, 10.3847/1538-3881/abd806

    ---. 2021 b , , 161, 147, 10.3847/1538-3881/abd806

    2021 doi

  3. [12]

    Bertone , E., Buzzoni , A., Ch \'a vez , M., & Rodr \' guez-Merino , L. H. 2008, , 485, 823, 10.1051/0004-6361:20078923

    2008 doi

  4. [13]

    S., Castelli , F., & Plez , B

    Bessell , M. S., Castelli , F., & Plez , B. 1998, , 333, 231

    1998

  5. [14]

    W., & Bouma , L

    Boyle , A. W., & Bouma , L. G. 2023, , 166, 14, 10.3847/1538-3881/acd3e8

    2023 doi

  6. [15]

    2012, , 427, 127, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21948.x

    Bressan , A., Marigo , P., Girardi , L., et al. 2012, , 427, 127, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21948.x

    2012

  7. [16]

    A., Williams , K

    Canton , P. A., Williams , K. A., Kilic , M., & Bolte , M. 2021, , 161, 169, 10.3847/1538-3881/abe1ad

    2021 doi

  8. [17]

    L., Elyajouri , M., & Monreal-Ibero , A

    Capitanio , L., Lallement , R., Vergely , J. L., Elyajouri , M., & Monreal-Ibero , A. 2017, , 606, A65, 10.1051/0004-6361/201730831

    2017 doi

  9. [18]

    A., Clayton , G

    Cardelli , J. A., Clayton , G. C., & Mathis , J. S. 1989, in IAU Symposium, Vol. 135, Interstellar Dust, ed. L. J. Allamandola & A. G. G. M. Tielens , 5--10

    1989

  10. [19]

    Castelli , F., & Kurucz , R. L. 2003, in IAU Symposium, Vol. 210, Modelling of Stellar Atmospheres, ed. N. Piskunov , W. W. Weiss , & D. F. Gray , A20. astro-ph/0405087

    2003 arXiv

  11. [20]

    C., Magnier , E

    Chambers , K. C., Magnier , E. A., Metcalfe , N., et al. 2016, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1612.05560, 10.48550/arXiv.1612.05560

    2016 doi arXiv

  12. [21]

    1995, , 101, 309, 10.1086/192242

    Charbonneau , P. 1995, , 101, 309, 10.1086/192242

    1995 doi

  13. [22]

    2015, in IAU General Assembly, Vol

    Chen , Y., Bressan , A., Girardi , L., & Marigo , P. 2015, in IAU General Assembly, Vol. 29, 2257534

    2015

  14. [23]

    2014, , 444, 2525, 10.1093/mnras/stu1605

    Chen , Y., Girardi , L., Bressan , A., et al. 2014, , 444, 2525, 10.1093/mnras/stu1605

    2014 doi

  15. [24]

    2016, ApJ, 823, 102

    Choi , J., Dotter , A., Conroy , C., et al. 2016, ApJ, 823, 102

    2016

  16. [25]

    1997, , 114, 699, 10.1086/118504

    Clampitt , L., & Burstein , D. 1997, , 114, 699, 10.1086/118504

    1997 doi

  17. [26]

    D., Holm , A

    Code , A. D., Holm , A. V., & Bottemiller , R. L. 1980, , 43, 501, 10.1086/190680

    1980 doi

  18. [27]

    A., & Megeath , S

    Cohen , M., Wheaton , W. A., & Megeath , S. T. 2003, , 126, 1090, 10.1086/376474

    2003 doi

  19. [28]

    Colavita , M. M. 1999, , 111, 111, 10.1086/316302

    1999 doi

  20. [29]

    M., Wallace , J

    Colavita , M. M., Wallace , J. K., Hines , B. E., et al. 1999, , 510, 505, 10.1086/306579

    1999 doi

  21. [30]

    Cote , J., & van Kerkwijk , M. H. 1993, , 274, 870

    1993

  22. [31]

    D., & Kalirai , J

    Cummings , J. D., & Kalirai , J. S. 2018, , 156, 165, 10.3847/1538-3881/aad5df

    2018 doi

  23. [32]

    D., Kalirai , J

    Cummings , J. D., Kalirai , J. S., Tremblay , P. E., Ramirez-Ruiz , E., & Choi , J. 2018, , 866, 21, 10.3847/1538-4357/aadfd6

    2018 doi

  24. [33]

    O'Brien , M

    Cunningham , T., Tremblay , P.-E., & W. O'Brien , M. 2024, , 527, 3602, 10.1093/mnras/stad3275

    2024 doi

  25. [34]

    M., Skrutskie , M

    Cutri , R. M., Skrutskie , M. F., van Dyk , S., et al. 2003, VizieR Online Data Catalog: 2MASS All-Sky Catalog of Point Sources (Cutri+ 2003) , VizieR On-line Data Catalog: II/246. Originally published in: University of Massachusetts and Infrared Processing and Analysis Center...

    2003

  26. [35]

    Dahm , S. E. 2015, , 813, 108, 10.1088/0004-637X/813/2/108

    2015 doi

  27. [36]

    J., & Hillenbrand , L

    David , T. J., & Hillenbrand , L. A. 2015, , 804, 146, 10.1088/0004-637X/804/2/146

    2015 doi

  28. [37]

    J., Deutschman , W

    Davis , R. J., Deutschman , W. A., & Haramundanis , K. L. 1973, Celescope catalog of ultraviolet stellar observations; 5068 objects measured by the Smithsonian experiment aboard the Orbiting Astronomical Observatory (OAO-2)

    1973

  29. [38]

    S., & Wesselius , P

    de Boer , K. S., & Wesselius , P. R. 1980, , 85, 1354, 10.1086/112806

    1980 doi

  30. [39]

    2011, , 529, A87, 10.1051/0004-6361/201015639

    Delaa , O., Stee , P., Meilland , A., et al. 2011, , 529, A87, 10.1051/0004-6361/201015639

    2011 doi

  31. [40]

    V., Blair , W

    Dixon , W. V., Blair , W. P., Kruk , J. W., & Romelfanger , M. L. 2013, , 125, 431, 10.1086/670227

    2013 doi

  32. [41]

    D., Casewell , S

    Dobbie , P. D., Casewell , S. L., Burleigh , M. R., & Boyce , D. D. 2009, , 395, 1591, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14645.x

    2009

  33. [42]

    2016, ApJS, 222, 8

    Dotter , A. 2016, ApJS, 222, 8

    2016

  34. [43]

    F., Richmond , M

    Droege , T. F., Richmond , M. W., Sallman , M. P., & Creager , R. P. 2006, , 118, 1666, 10.1086/510197

    2006 doi

  35. [44]

    1994, Baltic Astronomy, 3, 348, 10.1515/astro-1994-0404

    Dzervitis , U., Paupers , O., & Vansevicius , V. 1994, Baltic Astronomy, 3, 348, 10.1515/astro-1994-0404

    1994 doi

  36. [45]

    2008, , 478, 467, 10.1051/0004-6361:20078095

    Ekstr \"o m , S., Meynet , G., Maeder , A., & Barblan , F. 2008, , 478, 467, 10.1051/0004-6361:20078095

    2008 doi

  37. [46]

    El-Badry , K., Rix , H.-W., & Weisz , D. R. 2018, , 860, L17, 10.3847/2041-8213/aaca9c

    2018 doi

  38. [47]

    1987, , 71, 275

    Fehrenbach , C., Duflot , M., Burnage , R., et al. 1987, , 71, 275

    1987

  39. [48]

    L., & Massa , D

    Fitzpatrick , E. L., & Massa , D. 2005, , 129, 1642, 10.1086/427855

    2005 doi

  40. [49]

    B., Barrett , S

    Frost , E. B., Barrett , S. B., & Struve , O. 1926, , 64, 1, 10.1086/142986

    1926 doi

  41. [50]

    2018, A&A, 616, A10

    Gaia Collaboration . 2018, A&A, 616, A10

    2018

  42. [51]

    L., Sarro , L

    Gaia Collaboration , Smart , R. L., Sarro , L. M., et al. 2021, , 649, A6, 10.1051/0004-6361/202039498

    2021 doi

  43. [52]

    J., Barrado , D., Bouy , H., et al

    Galindo-Guil , F. J., Barrado , D., Bouy , H., et al. 2022, , 664, A70, 10.1051/0004-6361/202141114

    2022 doi

  44. [53]

    D., Fekel , F

    Gardner , T., Monnier , J. D., Fekel , F. C., et al. 2021, , 161, 40, 10.3847/1538-3881/abcf4e

    2021 doi

  45. [54]

    P., Tremblay , P

    Gentile Fusillo , N. P., Tremblay , P. E., Cukanovaite , E., et al. 2021, , 508, 3877, 10.1093/mnras/stab2672

    2021 doi

  46. [55]

    K., Apparao , K

    Ghosh , K. K., Apparao , K. M. V., & Pukalenthi , S. 1999, , 134, 359, 10.1051/aas:1999144

    1999 doi

  47. [56]

    E., & Abt , H

    Gomez , A. E., & Abt , H. A. 1982, , 94, 650, 10.1086/131038

    1982 doi

  48. [57]

    F., & Levato , H

    Gonz \'a lez , J. F., & Levato , H. 2006, , 448, 283, 10.1051/0004-6361:20053177

    2006 doi

  49. [58]

    D., Clayton , G

    Gordon , K. D., Clayton , G. C., Decleir , M., et al. 2023, , 950, 86, 10.3847/1538-4357/accb59

    2023 doi

  50. [59]

    D., Gies , D

    Gordon , K. D., Gies , D. R., Schaefer , G. H., Huber , D., & Ireland , M. 2019, , 873, 91, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab04b2

    2019 doi

  51. [60]

    Gray , R. O. 1998, , 116, 482, 10.1086/300397

    1998 doi

  52. [61]

    Henden , A. A. 2019, , 47, 130

    2019

  53. [62]

    Heyl , J., Caiazzo , I., Richer , H., & Miller , D. R. 2021, arXiv 2110.04296

    2021 arXiv

  54. [63]

    Heyl , J., Caiazzo , I., & Richer , H. B. 2022, , 926, 132, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac45fc

    2022 doi

  55. [64]

    V., et al

    H g , E., Fabricius , C., Makarov , V. V., et al. 2000, , 355, L27

    2000

  56. [65]

    2010, , 514, A1, 10.1051/0004-6361/200913811

    Ishihara , D., Onaka , T., Kataza , H., et al. 2010, , 514, A1, 10.1051/0004-6361/200913811

    2010 doi

  57. [66]

    1976, Ultraviolet bright-star spectrophotometric catalogue

    Jamar , C., Macau-Hercot , D., Monfils , A., et al. 1976, Ultraviolet bright-star spectrophotometric catalogue

    1976

  58. [67]

    L., & Mitchell , R

    Johnson , H. L., & Mitchell , R. I. 1975, , 1, 299

    1975

  59. [68]

    E., Sigut , T

    Jones , C. E., Sigut , T. A. A., Grzenia , B. J., Tycner , C., & Zavala , R. T. 2017, , 843, 24, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa72e4

    2017 doi

  60. [69]

    V., Piskunov , A

    Kharchenko , N. V., Piskunov , A. E., Schilbach , E., R \"o ser , S., & Scholz , R. D. 2012, , 543, A156, 10.1051/0004-6361/201118708

    2012 doi

  61. [70]

    C., Rivinius , T., et al

    Klement , R., Carciofi , A. C., Rivinius , T., et al. 2017, , 601, A74, 10.1051/0004-6361/201629932

    2017 doi

  62. [71]

    R., et al

    Klement , R., Rivinius , T., Gies , D. R., et al. 2024, , 962, 70, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad13ec

    2024 doi

  63. [72]

    L., et al

    Kluska , J., Kraus , S., Davies , C. L., et al. 2018, , 855, 44, 10.3847/1538-4357/aaacd3

    2018 doi

  64. [73]

    1971, , 23, 159

    Kodaira , K. 1971, , 23, 159

    1971

  65. [74]

    G., Volkov , I

    Kornilov , V. G., Volkov , I. M., Zakharov , A. I., et al. 1991, Trudy Gosudarstvennogo Astronomicheskogo Instituta, 63, 1

    1991

  66. [75]

    2018, , 616, A132, 10.1051/0004-6361/201832832

    Lallement , R., Capitanio , L., Ruiz-Dern , L., et al. 2018, , 616, A132, 10.1051/0004-6361/201832832

    2018 doi

  67. [76]

    L., Schaefer , G

    Lam , R., Sandquist , E. L., Schaefer , G. H., et al. 2023, , 166, 29, 10.3847/1538-3881/accddb

    2023 doi

  68. [77]

    Lawson , P. R., ed. 2000, Principles of Long Baseline Stellar Interferometry

    2000

  69. [78]

    L., & Silvotti , R

    Lodieu , N., P \'e rez-Garrido , A., Smart , R. L., & Silvotti , R. 2019, A&A, 628

    2019

  70. [79]

    L., Zhao , Y

    Luo , A. L., Zhao , Y. H., Zhao , G., & et al. 2022, VizieR Online Data Catalog: LAMOST DR7 catalogs (Luo+, 2019) , VizieR On-line Data Catalog: V/156. Originally published in: 2019RAA..in.prep..L

    2022

  71. [80]

    2018, VizieR Online Data Catalog: Sloan magnitudes for the brightest stars, V2 (Mallama, 2018) , VizieR On-line Data Catalog: II/355

    Mallama , A. 2018, VizieR Online Data Catalog: Sloan magnitudes for the brightest stars, V2 (Mallama, 2018) , VizieR On-line Data Catalog: II/355. Originally published in: 2018arXiv180509324M

    2018

  72. [81]

    W., & von Braun , K

    Mann , A. W., & von Braun , K. 2015, , 127, 102, 10.1086/680012

    2015 doi

  73. [82]

    2017, , 835, 77, 10.3847/1538-4357/835/1/77

    Marigo , P., Girardi , L., Bressan , A., et al. 2017, , 835, 77, 10.3847/1538-4357/835/1/77

    2017 doi

  74. [83]

    D., Curtis , J

    Marigo , P., Cummings , J. D., Curtis , J. L., et al. 2020, Nature Astronomy, 4, 1102, 10.1038/s41550-020-1132-1

    2020 doi

  75. [84]

    Massa , D., & Fitzpatrick , E. L. 2000, , 126, 517, 10.1086/313298

    2000 doi

  76. [85]

    Meade , M. R. 1999, , 118, 1073, 10.1086/300955

    1999 doi

  77. [86]

    2021, , 645, A84, 10.1051/0004-6361/202038610

    Meingast , S., Alves , J., & Rottensteiner , A. 2021, , 645, A84, 10.1051/0004-6361/202038610

    2021 doi

  78. [87]

    Mermilliod , J. C. 2006, VizieR Online Data Catalog: Homogeneous Means in the UBV System (Mermilliod 1991) , VizieR On-line Data Catalog: II/168. Originally published in: Institut d'Astronomie, Universite de Lausanne (1991)

    1991

  79. [88]

    R., Caiazzo , I., Heyl , J., Richer , H

    Miller , D. R., Caiazzo , I., Heyl , J., Richer , H. B., & Tremblay , P.-E. 2022, ApJL, 926

    2022

  80. [89]

    D., Zhao , M., Pedretti , E., et al

    Monnier , J. D., Zhao , M., Pedretti , E., et al. 2011, , 742, L1, 10.1088/2041-8205/742/1/L1

    2011 doi

  81. [90]

    2024, , 688, A97, 10.1051/0004-6361/202449895

    Montesinos , B. 2024, , 688, A97, 10.1051/0004-6361/202449895

    2024 doi

  82. [91]

    M., Sandquist , E

    Morales , L. M., Sandquist , E. L., Schaefer , G. H., et al. 2022, , 164, 34, 10.3847/1538-3881/ac7329

    2022 doi

  83. [92]

    1978, , 34, 477

    Morel , M., & Magnenat , P. 1978, , 34, 477

    1978

  84. [93]

    Morrell , N., & Abt , H. A. 1992, ApJ, 393, 666

    1992

  85. [94]

    A., Mathieu , R

    Morse , J. A., Mathieu , R. D., & Levine , S. E. 1991, , 101, 1495, 10.1086/115782

    1991 doi

  86. [95]

    Negueruela , I., Sim \'o n-D \' az , S., de Burgos , A., Casasbuenas , A., & Beck , P. G. 2024, , 690, A176, 10.1051/0004-6361/202449298

    2024 doi

  87. [96]

    T., & et al

    Nguyen , C. T., & et al. 2022, A&A, 665

    2022

  88. [97]

    H., Code , A

    Nordsieck , K. H., Code , A. D., Anderson , C. M., et al. 2002, VizieR Online Data Catalog: Wisconsin Ultraviolet Photo-Polarimeter Experiment (WUPPE, 1990-1995) , VizieR On-line Data Catalog: VI/105. Originally published in: 1994SPIE.2010....2N

    2002

  89. [98]

    2019, , 485, 5666, 10.1093/mnras/stz725

    Pastorelli , G., Marigo , P., Girardi , L., et al. 2019, , 485, 5666, 10.1093/mnras/stz725

    2019 doi

  90. [99]

    2020, , 498, 3283, 10.1093/mnras/staa2565

    ---. 2020, , 498, 3283, 10.1093/mnras/staa2565

    2020 doi

  91. [100]

    2015, , 580, A23, 10.1051/0004-6361/201526413

    Paunzen , E. 2015, , 580, A23, 10.1051/0004-6361/201526413

    2015 doi

  92. [101]

    2022, , 661, A89, 10.1051/0004-6361/202142355

    ---. 2022, , 661, A89, 10.1051/0004-6361/202142355

    2022 doi

  93. [102]

    2013, ApJS, 208, 4

    Paxton , B. 2013, ApJS, 208, 4

    2013

  94. [103]

    2015, ApJS, 220, 15

    ---. 2015, ApJS, 220, 15

    2015

  95. [104]

    2011, ApJS, 192, 3

    Paxton , B., Bildsten , L., Dotter , A., et al. 2011, ApJS, 192, 3

    2011

  96. [105]

    H., & Sareyan , J

    Pe \ n a , J. H., & Sareyan , J. P. 2006, , 42, 179

    2006

  97. [106]

    2014, , 126, 469, 10.1086/676976

    Petit , P., Louge , T., Th \'e ado , S., et al. 2014, , 126, 469, 10.1086/676976

    2014 doi

  98. [107]

    M., & Heard , J

    Petrie , R. M., & Heard , J. F. 1969, Publications of the Dominion Astrophysical Observatory Victoria, 13, 329

    1969

  99. [108]

    G., Roman-Lopes , A., Rom \'a n-Z \'u \ n iga , C

    Ram \' rez-Preciado , V. G., Roman-Lopes , A., Rom \'a n-Z \'u \ n iga , C. G., et al. 2020, , 894, 5, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab8127

    2020 doi

  100. [109]

    B., Caiazzo , I., Du , H., et al

    Richer , H. B., Caiazzo , I., Du , H., et al. 2021, , 912, 165, 10.3847/1538-4357/abdeb7

    2021 doi

  101. [110]

    2024, , 690, A16, 10.1051/0004-6361/202347701

    Rottensteiner , A., & Meingast , S. 2024, , 690, A16, 10.1051/0004-6361/202347701

    2024 doi

  102. [111]

    2024, , 681, A107, 10.1051/0004-6361/202346847

    Royer , P., Merle , T., Dsilva , K., et al. 2024, , 681, A107, 10.1051/0004-6361/202346847

    2024 doi

  103. [112]

    1999, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol

    Rucinski , S. 1999, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 185, IAU Colloq. 170: Precise Stellar Radial Velocities, ed. J. B. Hearnshaw & C. D. Scarfe , 82

    1999

  104. [113]

    Rucinski , S. M. 1992, AJ, 104, 1968

    1992

  105. [114]

    H., Hummel , C

    Schaefer , G. H., Hummel , C. A., Gies , D. R., et al. 2016, , 152, 213, 10.3847/0004-6256/152/6/213

    2016 doi

  106. [115]

    R., Monnier , J

    Setterholm , B. R., Monnier , J. D., Le Bouquin , J.-B., et al. 2023, Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems, 9, 025006, 10.1117/1.JATIS.9.2.025006

    2023 doi

  107. [116]

    Sigut , T. A. A., & Ghafourian , N. R. 2023, , 948, 34, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac940c

    2023 doi

  108. [117]

    E., Tycner , C., Sigut , T

    Silaj , J., Jones , C. E., Tycner , C., Sigut , T. A. A., & Smith , A. D. 2010, , 187, 228, 10.1088/0067-0049/187/1/228

    2010 doi

  109. [119]

    2006 b , , 131, 1163, 10.1086/498708

    ---. 2006 b , , 131, 1163, 10.1086/498708

    2006 doi

  110. [120]

    Smartt , S. J. 2009, , 47, 63, 10.1146/annurev-astro-082708-101737

    2009 doi

  111. [121]

    2014, , 445, 4287, 10.1093/mnras/stu2029

    Tang , J., Bressan , A., Rosenfield , P., et al. 2014, , 445, 4287, 10.1093/mnras/stu2029

    2014 doi

  112. [122]

    H., Avila , G., Buchhave , L., et al

    Telting , J. H., Avila , G., Buchhave , L., et al. 2014, Astronomische Nachrichten, 335, 41, 10.1002/asna.201312007

    2014 doi

  113. [123]

    A., McAlister , H

    ten Brummelaar , T. A., McAlister , H. A., Ridgway , S. T., et al. 2005, , 628, 453, 10.1086/430729

    2005 doi

  114. [124]

    A., Gies , D

    ten Brummelaar , T. A., Gies , D. G., McAlister , H. A., et al. 2016, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 9907, Optical and Infrared Interferometry and Imaging V, ed. F. Malbet , M. J. Creech-Eakman , & P. G. Tuthill , 990703, 1...

    2016 doi

  115. [125]

    I., Nandy , K., Jamar , C., et al

    Thompson , G. I., Nandy , K., Jamar , C., et al. 1978, Catalogue of stellar ultraviolet fluxes : a compilation of absolute stellar fluxes measured by the Sky Survey Telescope (S2/68) aboard the ESRO satellite TD-1 /

    1978

  116. [126]

    F., Monnier , J

    Torres , G., Boden , A. F., Monnier , J. D., & van Belle , G. T. 2024, , 977, 43, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad8dcc

    2024 doi

  117. [127]

    J., Beckman , J

    Trapero , J., Sempere , M. J., Beckman , J. E., & Hobbs , L. M. 1996, , 457, 731, 10.1086/176767

    1996 doi

  118. [128]

    2007, , 474, 653, 10.1051/0004-6361:20078357

    van Leeuwen , F. 2007, , 474, 653, 10.1051/0004-6361:20078357

    2007 doi

  119. [129]

    R., van Duinen , R

    Wesselius , P. R., van Duinen , R. J., de Jonge , A. R. W., et al. 1982, , 49, 427

    1982

  120. [130]

    L., Eisenhardt , P

    Wright , E. L., Eisenhardt , P. R. M., Mainzer , A. K., et al. 2010, , 140, 1868, 10.1088/0004-6256/140/6/1868

    2010 doi

  121. [131]

    2002, Baltic Astronomy, 11, 75

    Zdanavicius , J., & Zdanavicius , K. 2002, Baltic Astronomy, 11, 75

    2002

  122. [132]

    H., Schneider , A., & Song , I

    Zuckerman , B., Melis , C., Rhee , J. H., Schneider , A., & Song , I. 2012, ApJ, 752, 58

    2012

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.