High-density three-dimensional holography using rapid modulation of light

Jorge-Alberto Peralta-\'Angeles; Mario A. Quiroz-Ju\'arez; Mingyuan Hong; Omar S. Maga\~na-Loaiza; Roberto de J. Le\'on-Montiel

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 27 references

High-density three-dimensional holography using rapid modulation of light

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read By flashing one independent hologram per light point in rapid sequence, this paper eliminates coherence-induced crosstalk in 3D holography and reaches transverse point spacings as small as 100 micrometers.

desk verdict A real, simple DMD time-multiplexing demo for 3D point holography, but the 100 µm claim rests on spot-fidelity data the paper does not actually show. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.08253 v1 pith:Q7HZ5V3B submitted 2025-06-09 physics.optics

Jorge-Alberto Peralta-Ángeles , Mingyuan Hong , Mario A. Quiroz-Juárez , Omar S. Magaña-Loaiza , Roberto de J. León-Montiel This is my paper

classification physics.optics

keywords three-dimensionalholographydigitalmicromirrordeviceamplitudehologramKinoformlight-pointcontourcrosstalkeliminationhigh-density3DprojectionGaussianbeam

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper presents a method for reconstructing three-dimensional images with a digital micromirror device that projects each light point of a 3D object one at a time, using its own amplitude hologram, at refresh rates near 10 kHz. The central claim is that this sequential, point-by-point addressing eliminates the coherence-induced crosstalk between depth layers that normally limits digital holography, without adding scattering media or other optical elements. Because adjacent points no longer interfere, the spacing between projected points can be reduced to about 100 micrometers in the transverse plane. The authors show experimental reconstructions of a pyramid, a cone, and a double cone at increasing spot densities and report that the projected beams remain Gaussian-like across depths.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing element is the rapidly modulated binary hologram sequence. For each light point, an ideal Gaussian field at the desired transverse position and depth is back-propagated by the angular-spectrum method to the DMD plane, its phase is extracted and binarized (the Kinoform method), and the resulting hologram is flashed on the DMD for roughly 105 microseconds. Because the DMD's refresh rate near 10 kHz lets each of the up to 396 loaded holograms appear in sequence, every point of the 3D object is focused independently, which is what removes coherence-induced crosstalk.

What would settle it

Record the intensity profile between two adjacent points in a 100-micrometer-spaced contour plane of, say, the pyramid reconstruction; if the valley between the spots does not fall to a level consistent with two independent Gaussian beams, then temporal overlap or hologram distortion is adding crosstalk, and the claimed 100-micrometer resolution would not hold.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The core discovery is that coherence-induced multiplane crosstalk in 3D holography can be bypassed by time-sharing rather than phase engineering: each point of the discretized object is encoded in an independent binarized Kinoform hologram, displayed by the DMD in rapid succession, so only one spot is projected at any instant. Since the spots never overlap temporally, their coherence does not produce inter-plane interference, and the density of points in each contour plane can be increased up to a transverse separation of roughly 100 micrometers without visible crosstalk. The reconstructed objects are built from light-point contours in nine planes spanning a 24-mm depth range, and the method is validated by Gaussian-fidelity fits in single-spot tests and by increasing-density reconstructions of three solid shapes.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the binarized holograms computed from an ideal Gaussian field really produce clean, compact Gaussian spots at every required depth and transverse position, so that neighboring points separated by about 100 micrometers do not overlap or distort; the paper verifies Gaussian shape only for a single spot at three depths, not inside the dense arrays shown in the reconstructions.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Point separations of 100 micrometers with no inter-point interference mean the contour density of a 3D hologram can be raised until it is limited by the DMD's pixel count and memory, not by crosstalk.
The absence of scattering plates or additional coherence-breaking optics makes the projector compact, a step toward real-time, high-resolution 3D displays.
Because each point is independently controlled in space and time, one can in principle assign different intensities or on-times to points, enabling grayscale or variable-brightness holograms without redesigning the optics.
The depth range of the method is set by the DMD's depth of field, about 725 micrometers per plane here, so the number of planes in a given volume is a design parameter computed from the depth-of-field formula rather than an external limitation.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

A natural extension would be to measure the beam profile inside a dense 100-micrometer reconstruction rather than in isolated single-spot tests; if spot overlap or elongation appears there, the practical resolution would be lower than the nominal spacing.
Since the laser power is fixed, increasing spot density dims each point; equalizing brightness would require power scaling or per-point exposure weighting, a practical trade-off the paper notes but does not solve.
The same time-multiplexing principle could be combined with wavelength-multiplexed sources or multiple DMDs to scale to color or larger volumes without introducing crosstalk.
A testable prediction of the no-crosstalk claim is that contrast or sharpness of a dense contour should not degrade as the number of points grows, provided hologram fidelity holds; failure would pinpoint the actual limiting mechanism.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The one thing to know: this is a credible, simple experimental demonstration, and the headline claim—100 µm point spacing in 3D holographic projection with no coherence-induced crosstalk—is not yet backed by the measurements in the paper. The idea is to discretize each 3D object into individual light points, give each point its own binarized Fresnel hologram, and time-multiplex all of them on a DMD at ~10 kHz. The Fourier-optics derivation (Eqs. 1-4) is standard angular-spectrum propagation with a Gaussian target, correctly applied. What the paper does well is show that this can be done with a single DMD and no extra coherence-erasing optics: the images in Fig. 1 (4 to 25 spots in a plane) and Fig. 3 (120 to 396 point reconstructions of a pyramid, cone, double-cone) look visibly cleaner as density increases, with no obvious inter-plane crosstalk artifacts.

The soft spots are real but not disqualifying. The 100 µm claim rests on the assumption that every off-axis binarized hologram yields a compact Gaussian spot at its target (x_i, y_i, z_i); the paper only characterizes spots at the origin at three depths (Fig. 2), with R² fits of 0.97-0.99 but no reported waist, ellipticity, centroid error, or Strehl ratio. The authors actually flag increasing x-axis elongation from the DMD's tilt—which is precisely the failure mode that would eat into 100 µm spacing. In the dense reconstructions, there is no local spot-shape or overlap measurement; exposure times increase with point count as power is split, so the sharpness of Fig. 3 cannot be read as evidence against crosstalk. On the positive side, the circularity burden is low: no parameters were fitted to force the Gaussian results, and the R² values are self-consistency checks rather than tuned outputs. The "high density" wording is also optimistic: 396 points over 24×2×2 mm is roughly 4 points/mm³, and there is no quantitative comparison with the scattering-assisted or random-vector crosstalk methods in the cited literature.

Who is this for? Anyone building compact DMD-based 3D projectors where simplicity and alignment robustness matter more than point count. It deserves a serious referee: I would send it out, asking for spot-shape and position measurements inside the dense reconstructions (especially off-axis), a crosstalk control with a plane of isolated vs. adjacent points, error bars on the beam fits, and shared code/data. With those, this becomes a solid short paper. As written, it is a good demonstration whose central resolution claim is plausible but under-supported.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports a DMD-based holographic method for projecting three-dimensional objects from discretized light-point contours. For each point, the authors assume a Gaussian field (Eq. 1), propagate its Fourier spectrum back to the DMD plane with the angular-spectrum transfer function (Eqs. 2-3), and encode the result as a binarized kinoform hologram (Eq. 4). The holograms are displayed sequentially on the DMD, so each light point is temporally separated and coherent inter-point interference is avoided. The paper characterizes single-spot Gaussian fidelity at z = 80, 88, and 96 mm via R² fits (Fig. 2), shows a single-plane spot-density test with nominal separations down to about 102 µm (Fig. 1c-e), and presents 3D reconstructions of a pyramid, cone, and double-cone with 120, 200, and 396 spots at nominal spacings of ~333, ~200, and ~100 µm (Fig. 3). The central claim is that this scheme achieves high-density 3D reconstruction with point separations as small as 100 µm while eliminating coherence-induced crosstalk without extra optical elements.

Significance. The conceptual design is clean and the Fourier-optics derivation is standard: Eqs. (1)-(4) correctly describe how to compute an off-axis focused spot hologram, and temporal multiplexing is a legitimate way to avoid simultaneous coherent interference between points. If the 100 µm spacing claim is quantitatively supported, the method could be a useful compact alternative to scattering-based or random-phase 3D holography. Strengths include the explicit depth-of-field recurrence (Eq. 6), the use of open-source DMD control (pycrafter6500), and the qualitative demonstration that contour density can be increased without obvious visual degradation. The main weakness is that the quantitative evidence for the headline density is incomplete: the beam characterization is limited to on-axis single spots and reports only R² values, and the dense reconstructions are not analyzed for local spot fidelity or background. These gaps are load-bearing because the temporal-multiplexing argument only removes coherent crosstalk if each individual hologram produces a clean, compact spot.

major comments (3)

[Sec. II.C, Fig. 2] The single-spot characterization reports R² values of Gaussian fits but does not report the fitted waist, ellipticity, centroid error, or Strehl ratio. The text explicitly notes an increasing x-axis elongation with propagation, attributed to DMD tilt; without measured waist parameters it is impossible to know whether the effective spot radius at z = 96 mm is small enough to keep two spots separated by 100 µm distinct. Please provide measured transverse 1/e² radii along x and y at each characterized plane and at representative off-axis positions corresponding to the dense reconstructions.
[Sec. II.D, Fig. 3] The dense 3D reconstructions are presented only as 20-shot averages with exposure time scaled by hologram count; no local spot-shape, overlap, or background measurement is reported. Because the central claim is that 100 µm spacing is achieved without compromising image quality, the paper should quantify the point-spread function inside dense patterns (e.g., line cuts through adjacent spots and midpoint-to-peak intensity ratios) and compare them with isolated-spot performance. Visual sharpness of averaged images does not rule out accumulation of stray light from the 396 sequential holograms.
[Sec. II.A, Eq. (4)] The binarized kinoform step is delegated to a reference ([12]) and the resulting diffraction efficiency and background level are not quantified. Since the elimination of crosstalk relies on each hologram producing a clean focused spot, the presence of uncharacterized background from binary encoding could become significant when 396 holograms are integrated by the camera. Please report the zero-order/background fraction and, if possible, the measured intensity profile of a single off-axis spot at the target plane.

minor comments (4)

[Title/author block] The title contains a typo: 'rapid mo dulation' should read 'rapid modulation'; the author list also shows an odd space in 'Jorge-Alberto Peralta- ´Angeles'.
[Fig. 1 caption] The caption says 'five squares by side' where 'spots per side' is meant, and the spot separation is given as 102.8 µm while the main text says 102.08 µm; these should be reconciled.
[Sec. II.C] The beam-characterization section would be easier to interpret if the Gaussian fit function and the definition of R² were stated, and if the fitted waist values (not only R²) were listed.
[References] Reference [26] lists only 'Goodman, Fourier optics' without author initials, publisher location, or edition; the full citation should be provided.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: holograms are constructed from an assumed Gaussian model, and the experimental checks are self-consistency tests rather than fitted predictions.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained and non-circular. The method starts by assuming each light spot is a Gaussian field with waist w0=25 µm (Eq. 1), Fourier transforms it (Eq. 2), back-propagates with the angular-spectrum Fresnel propagator (Eqs. 3-4), and binarizes the resulting Kinoform phase hologram. Every spot is independently encoded and sequentially displayed, so the claimed absence of coherence-induced crosstalk follows directly from temporal separation of the holograms, not from a fitted parameter. The beam characterization in Sec. II.C verifies that the produced spots remain Gaussian-like at three distances (R^2 between 0.97 and 0.99); this is a self-consistency check of the optical system, not a prediction used to set the method's constants. The 100 µm point-separation claim is an experimental demonstration: the spot coordinates are chosen directly and the reconstructions in Fig. 3 show the resulting spacing (e.g., ~102 µm and ~100 µm cases). No parameter is fitted to force this result, and no equation reduces by construction to another equation in a circular way. Self-citations (refs. 12, 15-17) appear only as background on DMD and quantum/statistical imaging capabilities and are not load-bearing for the central derivation; the DoF formulas are taken from external refs. 21 and 22, and the Kinoform method is standard Fourier optics. Concerns about off-axis spot fidelity, spot elongation, or insufficient characterization inside dense reconstructions are correctness and validation limitations, not circularity. Therefore the paper is essentially circularity-free.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The method rests on standard Fourier optics (angular spectrum, Kinoform binarization) plus the experimental assumptions that the illumination is effectively uniform over the DMD and that the binarized holograms produce clean Gaussian spots over the full depth range. The free parameters w0=25 µm, N=651, and z0=80 mm are design choices, not fitted to data; the spot positions are model inputs. No invented entities are introduced.

free parameters (3)

Gaussian spot waist w0 = 25 µm
Sets the transverse size of each reconstructed point; chosen by the authors. The achievable point separation (100 µm) and depth of field depend on this value; no systematic optimization is reported.
Hologram size N = 651 pixels
Each spot hologram uses a 651x651-pixel region of the DMD; this sets the shortest achievable focal length (about 59 mm) and the transverse field of view. Chosen as a compromise, not derived.
Starting plane position z0 = 80 mm
The first image plane is placed 80 mm from the DMD; subsequent plane positions follow from Eq. (6). This choice depends on the optical layout and is not optimized.

assumptions (5)

standard math Angular spectrum back-propagation with the Fresnel transfer function (Eq. 3) correctly describes the field from the DMD plane to the focal plane at z_i.
Invoked in Eq. (4) to compute the DMD-plane field; standard Fourier optics (Goodman).
domain assumption Each light spot is well described by the ideal Gaussian field of Eq. (1) with a fixed waist w0=25 µm.
The holograms are designed for this model; the measured spots show an x-axis elongation (Sec. II.C), so the model is idealized.
domain assumption The DMD is illuminated by a spatially uniform plane wave so that the computed phase hologram produces the intended field.
No illumination beam profile is characterized in Sec. II.B; an aperture is used but flatness is not verified.
standard math The depth-of-field formula DoF_i = 8*lambda*z_i^2/D^2 (Eq. 5) from refs. [21,22] is valid for this pixelated modulator and is used to set plane spacing.
Taken from the cited literature and used to avoid inter-plane overlap.
domain assumption Kinoform phase-to-binary binarization (per ref. [12]) produces holograms whose diffraction efficiency and fidelity are adequate for the spot array.
Binarization is known to introduce noise; the paper does not quantify its effect on spot fidelity at high densities.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of High-density three-dimensional holography using rapid modulation of light." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/Q7HZ5V3B

@misc{pith2026250608253,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: High-density three-dimensional holography using rapid modulation of light},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/Q7HZ5V3B}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.08253}
}

abstract

One of the most common methods for reconstructing three-dimensional (3D) images of real objects is digital holography. This technique relies on the use of electro-optical devices that modify the phase or amplitude of light fields in a controlled manner, the so-called spatial light modulators. However, given that holography typically requires coherent light sources, a common problem with three-dimensional projection is the crosstalk between the layers that make up the 3D object. This limits full-depth control and directly affects image quality. Interestingly, in the past few years, several methods have proven to be effective in breaking layer crosstalk by erasing the spatial coherence of light. A drawback of such solutions is that, in many cases, additional optical resources are required to achieve such a task. In this work, we present a method for high-density reconstruction of three-dimensional objects using rapid modulation of light fields by means of digital micromirror devices (DMDs). The 3D reconstruction is performed by discretizing the object into multiplane light-point contours, where the resolution of the contours is controlled by the density of the light points. This allows us to achieve point separations, in the transverse plane, as small as 100 $\mu$m. The high refresh rate of the DMD ($\sim 10$ kHz) allows for a reconstruction where each point of the 3D image is spatially and temporally controlled by independent amplitude holograms, thus effectively eliminating coherence-induced multiplane crosstalk without the need for additional optical elements. Because of its simplicity and versatility, we believe that our method provides a practical route toward compact, high-resolution 3D holographic projectors.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.08253 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** shows the reconstruction of these three objects with increasingly higher spot density. The first column shows the 3D rendered solid figures, while the second, third and fourth columns show the holographic projections using 120, 200 and 396 light spots, respectively. The spot density is calculated taking into account the contour perimeter of each plane, the spacing between spots and the maximum number of correctly d… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

27 extracted references · 27 canonical work pages

[12]

Mirhosseini, O

M. Mirhosseini, O. S. Magana-Loaiza, C. Chen, B. Ro- denburg, M. Malik, and R. W. Boyd, Rapid generation of light beams carrying orbital angular momentum, Opt. Express 21, 30196 (2013)

work page 2013
[1]

Y. Pan, J. Liu, X. Li, and Y. Wang, A review of dynamic holographic three-dimensional display: algorithms, de- vices, and systems, IEEE Transactions on Industrial In- formatics 12, 1599 (2016)

work page 2016
[2]

Rhisheekesan, D

A. Rhisheekesan, D. Thomas, V. R. K, G. T, P. A. V, J. P. Ulahannan, and S. Damodarakurup, Review on digital holography techniques using digital micromirror device, Optics and Lasers in Engineering 177, 108120 (2024)

work page 2024
[3]

Liu, S.-Y

J.-P. Liu, S.-Y. Wang, P. Tsang, and T.-C. Poon, Nonlin- earity compensation and complex-to-phase conversion of complex incoherent digital holograms for optical recon- struction, Opt. Express 24, 14582 (2016)

work page 2016
[4]

A. B. Ayoub and D. Psaltis, High speed, complex wave- front shaping using the digital micro-mirror device, Sci- entiﬁc Reports 11, 18837 (2021)

work page 2021
[5]

Y. Zhao, Y. Wei, X. Cui, L. Qu, L. Liu, and Y. Wang, 3D display technology in medical imaging ﬁeld, in 2013 IEEE International Conference on Medical Imaging Physics and Engineering (2013) pp. 210–214

work page 2013
[6]

Zhang, D

C. Zhang, D. Zhang, and Z. Bian, Dynamic full-color digi- tal holographic 3D display on single DMD, Opto-Electron Advances 4, 200049 (2021)

work page 2021
[7]

Sando, D

Y. Sando, D. Barada, and T. Yatagai, Full-color holo- graphic 3D display with horizontal full viewing zone by spatiotemporal-division multiplexing, Appl. Opt. 57, 7622 (2018)

work page 2018

Show all 27 references

[8]

Ouyang, X

W. Ouyang, X. Xu, W. Lu, N. Zhao, F. Han, and S.-C. Chen, Ultrafast 3D nanofabrication via digital hologra- phy, Nat. Commun. 14, 1716 (2023)

2023
[9]

Xiong, E.-L

J. Xiong, E.-L. Hsiang, Z. He, T. Zhan, and S.-T. Wu, Augmented reality and virtual reality displays: emerging technologies and future perspectives, Light: Sci. & Appl. 10, 216 (2021)

2021
[10]

C. Jang, K. Bang, M. Chae, B. Lee, and D. Lanman, Waveguide holography for 3D augmented reality glasses, Nat. Commun. 15, 66 (2024)

2024
[11]

Wang, Y.-L

D. Wang, Y.-L. Li, F. Chu, N.-N. Li, Z.-S. Li, S.-D. Lee, Z.-Q. Nie, C. Liu, and Q.-H. Wang, Color liquid crystal grating based color holographic 3D display system with large viewing angle, Light: Sci. & Appl. 13, 16 (2024)

2024
[13]

Perez-Garcia, F

B. Perez-Garcia, F. I. Mecillas-Hern´ andez, and C. Rosales-Guzm´ an, Highly-stable generation of vector beams through a common-path interferometer and a DMD, Journal of Optics 24, 074007 (2022)

2022
[14]

Lerner, D

V. Lerner, D. Shwa, Y. Drori, and N. Katz, Shaping Laguerre-Gaussian laser modes with binary gratings us- ing a digital micromirror device, Opt. Lett. 37, 4826 (2012)

2012
[15]

Bhusal, M

N. Bhusal, M. Hong, A. Miller, M. A. Quiroz-Ju´ arez, R. d. J. Le´ on-Montiel, C. You, and O. S. Maga˜ na-Loaiza, Smart quantum statistical imaging beyond the Abbe- Rayleigh criterion, npj Quantum Inf. 8, 83 (2022)

2022
[16]

M. Hong, A. Miller, R. d. J. Le´ on-Montiel, C. You, and O. S. Maga˜ na-Loaiza, Engineering super-Poissonian pho- ton statistics of spatial light modes, Laser Photonics Rev. 17, 2300117 (2023)

2023
[17]

Mostafavi, M

F. Mostafavi, M. Hong, R. B. Dawkins, J. Ferdous, I. Baum, R.-B. Jin, R. d. J. Le´ on-Montiel, C. You, and O. S. Maga˜ na-Loaiza, Multiphoton quantum imaging us- ing natural light, Appl. Phys. Rev. 12, 011424 (2025)

2025
[18]

Dudley, W

D. Dudley, W. M. Duncan, and J. Slaughter, Emerg- ing digital micromirror device (DMD) applications, in MOEMS Display and Imaging Systems , Vol. 4985, edited by H. Urey, International Society for Optics and Photon- 7 ics (SPIE, 2003) pp. 14 – 25

2003
[19]

P. Zhu, O. Fajardo, J. Shum, Y.-P. Z. Sch¨ arer, and R. W. Friedrich, High-resolution optical control of spatiotemp o- ral neuronal activity patterns in zebraﬁsh using a digital micromirror device, Nature Protocols 7, 1410 (2012)

2012
[20]

M. L. Huebschman, B. Munjuluri, and H. R. Garner, Dynamic holographic 3-D image projection, Opt. Express 11, 437 (2003)

2003
[21]

P. Yu, Y. Liu, Z. Wang, J. Liang, X. Liu, Y. Li, C. Qiu, and L. Gong, Ultrahigh-density 3D holographic projec- tion by scattering-assisted dynamic holography, Optica 10, 481 (2023)

2023
[22]

Makey, ¨Ozg¨ un Yavuz, D

G. Makey, ¨Ozg¨ un Yavuz, D. K. Kesim, A. Turnalı, P. Elahi, S. Ilday, O. Tokel, and F. ¨Omer Ilday, Breaking crosstalk limits to dynamic holography using orthogonal- ity of high-dimensional random vectors, Nature Photon- ics 13, 251 (2019)

2019
[23]

J. Park, K. Lee, and Y. Park, Ultrathin wide-angle large-area digital 3D holographic display using a non- periodic photon sieve, Nature Communications 10, 10.1038/s41467-019-09126-9 (2019)

2019 doi
[24]

H. Yu, K. Lee, J. Park, and Y. Park, Ultrahigh-deﬁnition dynamic 3D holographic display by active control of vol- ume speckle ﬁelds, Nature Photonics 11, 186 (2017)

2017
[25]

A. H. Dorrah, P. Bordoloi, V. S. de Angelis, J. O. de Sarro, L. A. Ambrosio, M. Zamboni-Rached, and F. Capasso, Light sheets for continuous-depth hologra- phy and three-dimensional volumetric displays, Nature Photonics 17, 427 (2023)

2023
[26]

Goodman, Fourier optics (Roberts And Company Pub- lishers, 2005)

2005
[27]

Pozzi, D

P. Pozzi, D. Wilding, O. Soloviev, H. Verstraete, L. Bli ek, G. Vdovin, and M. Verhaegen, High speed wavefront sen- sorless aberration correction in digital micromirror base d confocal microscopy, Opt. Express 25, 949 (2017)

2017

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [12]

Mirhosseini, O

M. Mirhosseini, O. S. Magana-Loaiza, C. Chen, B. Ro- denburg, M. Malik, and R. W. Boyd, Rapid generation of light beams carrying orbital angular momentum, Opt. Express 21, 30196 (2013)

work page 2013

[2] [1]

Y. Pan, J. Liu, X. Li, and Y. Wang, A review of dynamic holographic three-dimensional display: algorithms, de- vices, and systems, IEEE Transactions on Industrial In- formatics 12, 1599 (2016)

work page 2016

[3] [2]

Rhisheekesan, D

A. Rhisheekesan, D. Thomas, V. R. K, G. T, P. A. V, J. P. Ulahannan, and S. Damodarakurup, Review on digital holography techniques using digital micromirror device, Optics and Lasers in Engineering 177, 108120 (2024)

work page 2024

[4] [3]

Liu, S.-Y

J.-P. Liu, S.-Y. Wang, P. Tsang, and T.-C. Poon, Nonlin- earity compensation and complex-to-phase conversion of complex incoherent digital holograms for optical recon- struction, Opt. Express 24, 14582 (2016)

work page 2016

[5] [4]

A. B. Ayoub and D. Psaltis, High speed, complex wave- front shaping using the digital micro-mirror device, Sci- entiﬁc Reports 11, 18837 (2021)

work page 2021

[6] [5]

Y. Zhao, Y. Wei, X. Cui, L. Qu, L. Liu, and Y. Wang, 3D display technology in medical imaging ﬁeld, in 2013 IEEE International Conference on Medical Imaging Physics and Engineering (2013) pp. 210–214

work page 2013

[7] [6]

Zhang, D

C. Zhang, D. Zhang, and Z. Bian, Dynamic full-color digi- tal holographic 3D display on single DMD, Opto-Electron Advances 4, 200049 (2021)

work page 2021

[8] [7]

Sando, D

Y. Sando, D. Barada, and T. Yatagai, Full-color holo- graphic 3D display with horizontal full viewing zone by spatiotemporal-division multiplexing, Appl. Opt. 57, 7622 (2018)

work page 2018