Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 8 minor 95 references

Aerial Shepherds: Enabling Hierarchical Localization in Heterogeneous MAV Swarms

T0 review · 1 major / 8 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read TransformLoc claims that a few well-equipped drones can act as flying localization beacons for a larger fleet of cheap, resource-limited drones, keeping their real-time position error under about one meter without any pre-deployed…

desk verdict A solid system paper with a real testbed and honest limitations, but the abstract overstates accuracy and the AMAV-error assumption remains untested. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.08408 v1 pith:3PPDCF6F submitted 2025-06-10 cs.NI

Haoyang Wang , Jingao Xu , Chenyu Zhao , Yuhan Cheng , Xuecheng Chen , Chaopeng Hong , Xiao-Ping Zhang , Yunhao Liu
show 1 more author
Xinlei Chen
This is my paper
classification cs.NI
keywords heterogeneousMAVswarmaerialshepherdsmobilelocalizationinfrastructureerror-awarejointestimationKalmanfiltersimilarity-instructedgrouping-schedulingnon-myopicschedulingsearchtreepruning
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Some drones in a heterogeneous swarm carry heavy sensors and computing, while most are cheap, light, and prone to drifting position estimates. The paper's claim is that the few capable drones can be repurposed as "aerial shepherds"—mobile localization infrastructure—that watch and correct the cheap ones, so the whole swarm stays localized in real time without GPS, fixed beacons, or SLAM on every vehicle. If this works, a small number of expensive drones can buy accurate positioning for a large fleet of inexpensive ones, with reported average error under one meter in real time and up to 68 percent better localization than the tested baselines. A sympathetic reader would take the core insight as removing the infrastructure bottleneck from lightweight MAV swarms.

What carries the argument

The central machinery is a two-part control loop. First, an error-aware joint location estimation model, built on a Kalman filter, fuses each BMAV's noisy motion prediction with range-and-bearing observations made by AMAVs; the trace of the BMAV's estimation covariance matrix, $\operatorname{tr}(\Sigma_{i,t})$, is the uncertainty indicator that tells AMAVs which BMAVs are in greatest need. Second, a similarity-instructed adaptive grouping-scheduling strategy decomposes the many-to-many resource allocation problem: a Voronoi diagram groups BMAVs to their nearest AMAV, a search tree over AMAV motion commands plans $\delta$-step lookahead trajectories, and the tree is pruned using $\epsilon$-algebraic redundancy and trajectory $\sigma$-crossing criteria to eliminate nodes that are spatially close and informationally redundant. This keeps the scheduling computation light enough to run in real time on the AMAVs.

What would settle it

Conduct the in-field two-AMAV/six-BMAV trial a second time with AMAV localization intentionally degraded, for example by adding controlled IMU drift so that AMAV error reaches 30 to 50 cm, while leaving all BMAV algorithms unchanged; if BMAV absolute trajectory error stays below 1.5 meters, the AMAV-accuracy assumption is not load-bearing, whereas if ATE rises roughly with the injected bias, the assumption is confirmed as the system's weak point.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper claims that resource-constrained BMAVs, which otherwise rely on dead reckoning and accumulate large errors, can be kept accurately localized by intermittent visual observations from AMAVs, provided those observations are scheduled where they matter. The scheduling is driven by a Kalman-filter-based joint estimation model in which the trace of each BMAV's covariance matrix serves as a proxy for its unknown localization error, telling AMAVs which BMAVs to assist. A similarity-instructed adaptive grouping-scheduling strategy then partitions the swarm by Voronoi regions and plans each AMAV's motion several steps ahead on a pruned search tree, reducing what would be an exponential resource-allocation problem to linear scale. In-field experiments with two AMAVs and six BMAVs report absolute trajectory error below 1.5 meters, while physical-feature-based simulations with five AMAVs and twenty BMAVs report below 0.7 meters; navigation success rates improve by up to 60 percent over baselines.

Load-bearing premise

The system assumes an AMAV's own position estimate is accurate enough, within about 10 cm, that its range-and-bearing observations are unbiased corrections for BMAVs, and the paper states that when this assumption fails the error-reduction benefit degrades.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the central claim holds, a heterogeneous swarm can localize itself indoors or in GPS-denied spaces without pre-deployed infrastructure, using a few well-equipped drones as mobile beacons.
  • BMAVs with minimal onboard sensing can navigate to destinations with high success rates; in the reported trials success reaches 100 percent under looser destination-accuracy constraints.
  • The exponential AMAV scheduling problem is reduced to linear scale through grouping and pruning, so the approach remains practical as swarm size grows within the tested range.
  • Any localization technique that can give an AMAV an accurate own-state estimate, and any visual or range observation modality, can in principle be plugged into the framework, making it modular across platforms.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the roughly 10 cm AMAV-accuracy threshold is the binding constraint, the approach would likely benefit in the field from fusing the AMAV's own estimate with additional onboard cues to verify its state before broadcasting corrections, something the paper leaves to future work.
  • The same grouping-scheduling machinery could transfer to heterogeneous ground robot teams, warehouse drones, or underwater vehicles wherever a few well-localized agents can observe many poorly-localized ones; this is testable by swapping the observation model.
  • Using covariance trace as a stand-in for true error assumes the Kalman model's Gaussian noise is roughly correct; a testable extension would compare trace-based selection against direct error estimates from occasional ground-truth checkpoints to see where the proxy misleads scheduling.
  • The reported improvements come from an 8m x 8m area with an AMAV observation range capped at one meter, so a fair extrapolation would test the system's sensitivity to room scale and to sparser BMAV distributions.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 8 minor

Summary. The paper proposes TransformLoc, a hierarchical localization framework for heterogeneous MAV swarms in which a small number of advanced MAVs (AMAVs) act as mobile localization infrastructure for resource-limited basic MAVs (BMAVs). The system uses an error-aware joint location estimation model, based on intermittent Kalman corrections from AMAV camera/AprilTag observations, with the trace of the BMAV state covariance used as an uncertainty proxy to decide which BMAVs to assist. A similarity-instructed adaptive grouping-scheduling strategy partitions the area via Voronoi diagrams and plans AMAV trajectories with a pruned lookahead search tree. The authors report in-field experiments with 2 AMAVs and 6 BMAVs in an 8m x 8m motion-capture room, plus physical-feature-based simulations with 5 AMAVs and 20 BMAVs, claiming ATE below 1.5m in-field and below 0.7m in simulation, improved navigation success rates, and lower latency than CCM-SLAM.

Significance. If validated, TransformLoc would be a useful contribution to cost-effective swarm localization: it avoids external infrastructure, keeps the computational burden on the resource-rich AMAVs, and provides a concrete algorithmic pipeline for intermittent Kalman corrections and non-myopic AMAV scheduling. The paper's strengths include a real testbed with motion-capture ground truth, comparison against three baselines plus CCM-SLAM, robustness sweeps over agent counts and noise levels, and an ablation of the grouping and uncertainty-indicator components. The central Kalman-filter mechanism is standard and internally coherent, and the ATE evaluation against motion capture is an independent check on the system. However, the headline quantitative claims are not all directly supported by the reported numbers, and the system's dependence on AMAV self-localization accuracy is not experimentally interrogated, leaving a correctness risk in the central claim.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract; §5.2.1] The abstract states that TransformLoc achieves "an average localization error of under 1m" and outperforms baselines "by up to 68%" while improving navigation success rates "by 60%." Section 5.2.1 reports only that the CDF of ATE stays below 1.5m for TransformLoc and below 2.4–3m for the baselines; no mean or median ATE is given, and the computation behind "68%" and "60%" is not shown. The in-field success-rate margins reported in Sec. 5.2.1 are 22.3%, 25.6%, and 55.6% over the respective baselines, which do not transparently yield "60%," and the 68% localization figure appears to be closer to the simulation numbers (Sec. 5.2.2) than to the in-field CDFs. Please report the exact metric definitions and per-condition numbers supporting each headline claim, and reconcile the abstract with Sec. 5.2.1.
minor comments (8)
  1. [Index Terms] The index term "Micro Aearial Vehicle" contains a typo; it should read "Micro Aerial Vehicle."
  2. [§1, Fig. 2a discussion] The sentence describing CCM-SLAM says the BMAV achieved "a low localization error (>0.3 cm)"; the inequality sign appears to be inverted and the magnitude is inconsistent with the surrounding comparison.
  3. [§3.1.4, Eq. (3)] The Field-of-View definition in Eq. (3) is difficult to parse because the angular condition is not typeset cleanly; please rewrite it with explicit inequalities for the bearing range.
  4. [§3.1.3, Eq. (2)] Eq. (2) is described as "double integrator dynamics," but the state update is a first-order velocity-displacement model; either revise the description or include the acceleration term.
  5. [§4.2.2] The statement "If no BMAVs are present within an AMAV's region, it allocates sensing resources to all BMAVs over the duration of δ" appears to contradict the earlier claim that the grouping step converts the problem into disjoint one-to-many assignments; please clarify this exceptional case.
  6. [§5.1.2] The empirical noise percentages for BMAV motion and AMAV range/bearing measurements (20%, 10%, 5%) are calibrated on the same testbed used for evaluation; please report a held-out validation or a sensitivity analysis showing how the results depend on these values.
  7. [§5.2, Figs. 7–10] The presented CDFs and bar charts do not include error bars or the number of repeated trials; please state whether the curves aggregate all BMAVs over a single 420-second run or over multiple independent runs.
  8. [§8(v)] The first sentence of Sec. 8(v) says the framework "is able to run when AMAVs and BMAVs have different altitudes," but the following text says the framework "assumes constant altitude and equal operational conditions"; these statements should be reconciled.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central ATE claims are measured against independent motion-capture ground truth and do not reduce by construction to the covariance objective or to fitted noise parameters.

full rationale

TransformLoc's central derivation is self-contained against independent ground truth. The error-aware joint estimation is a standard Kalman filter (Algorithm 1): prediction from a noisy motion model (Eq. 2) and correction from AMAV range/bearing observations (Eq. 4). The scheduling objective (Eq. 8) minimizes the trace of the BMAV covariance, while the reported localization metric, ATE, is measured against a 240 FPS motion-capture system (Sec. 5.1.1), not against the covariance trace. Eq. (7) is an explicit proxy for the true localization error, not an identity forced by construction, and the paper validates this proxy empirically in Sec. 5.5.2. The empirically calibrated noise models (20%, 10%, 5%; Sec. 5.1.2) are inputs to the filter and simulator, not parameters fitted to reproduce the reported ATE; the in-field ATE is independently measured and does not reduce to those fitted values. The self-citations present, most notably the H-SwarmLoc baseline [12], are evaluation choices rather than load-bearing derivations: no central claim is justified solely by a self-citation, and no uniqueness or impossibility claim is imported from the authors' prior work. The stated caveats about AMAV localization error (Sec. 7(ii)) and zero-mean observation noise (Sec. 8(iv)) are explicit limitations and assumptions, not circular steps. No prediction in the paper is equivalent to its inputs by construction, so the appropriate finding is no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities. The central claim rests on six fitted or hand-chosen parameters (noise scales, command interval, pruning parameters, control discretization) and several domain assumptions that restrict the operating envelope to small indoor areas with accurate AMAV localization and zero-mean observation noise.

free parameters (6)
  • BMAV motion noise scale = 20% of measured velocity
    Set from testbed measurements; used in Eq. (2) and the Kalman prediction step; controls covariance growth and thus the uncertainty metric that drives AMAV tasking.
  • AMAV range observation noise scale = 10% of measured range
    Calibrated on the testbed; used in Eq. (4) observation noise; affects the Kalman correction gain and simulated ATE.
  • AMAV bearing observation noise scale = 5% of measured bearing
    Calibrated on the testbed; used in Eq. (4); affects correction quality and the scheduler's predicted covariance.
  • Command interval delta = 5 steps
    Chosen in Sec. 5.1.2; defines BMAV control period, grouping refresh rate, and AMAV lookahead horizon; Fig. 10c shows localization error depends strongly on this choice.
  • Pruning parameters epsilon and sigma = epsilon = 1, sigma = 10
    Hand-set in Sec. 5.1.2; control the amount of search-tree pruning; Fig. 11a shows the epsilon choice trades runtime against ATE, so reported performance is sensitive to these constants.
  • AMAV control primitives set = u in {0,1,3} m/s, omega in {0, plus/minus 1, plus/minus 3} rad/s
    Discretized control space in Sec. 4.3.1; the search tree branches over these 15 actions; a different discretization would change achievable planning quality.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption All MAVs operate at equal altitude.
    Invoked in Sec. 3.1.1; the state and observation models in Eqs. (1)-(4) are 2D, and Sec. 8(v) leaves varying altitudes to future work. A violation changes FoV and observation geometry.
  • domain assumption Observation noise is zero-mean Gaussian.
    Used in the Kalman correction (Eq. (4)); Sec. 8(iv) admits that lighting, sensor noise, and occlusions can introduce non-zero mean errors, which would bias the correction.
  • domain assumption AMAV localization error is below about 10cm.
    Sec. 7(ii) states the system 'significantly enhances' BMAV localization only when AMAV localization error is less than 10cm; the observation model treats AMAV state as accurate.
  • domain assumption BMAVs rely solely on dead-reckoning from IMU and optical flow.
    Sec. 4.4 defines the BMAV localization setup as dead-reckoning only; this defines the niche but limits generality to BMAVs with no independent perception.
  • domain assumption The physical-feature-based simulator reproduces the real testbed.
    Robustness and ablation results in Figs. 8-10 come from this simulator; its fidelity is not independently validated or released, so simulation-based claims inherit this assumption.
  • standard math Trace of the state covariance is a valid uncertainty measure for BMAV localization error.
    Standard in Kalman filtering; the paper validates correlation with ATE in Fig. 11b, but the scheduling objective optimizes this proxy, so the resource allocation is only as good as the proxy.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Aerial Shepherds: Enabling Hierarchical Localization in Heterogeneous MAV Swarms." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3PPDCF6F

@misc{pith2026250608408,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Aerial Shepherds: Enabling Hierarchical Localization in Heterogeneous MAV Swarms},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3PPDCF6F}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.08408}
}
read the original abstract

A heterogeneous micro aerial vehicles (MAV) swarm consists of resource-intensive but expensive advanced MAVs (AMAVs) and resource-limited but cost-effective basic MAVs (BMAVs), offering opportunities in diverse fields. Accurate and real-time localization is crucial for MAV swarms, but current practices lack a low-cost, high-precision, and real-time solution, especially for lightweight BMAVs. We find an opportunity to accomplish the task by transforming AMAVs into mobile localization infrastructures for BMAVs. However, translating this insight into a practical system is challenging due to issues in estimating locations with diverse and unknown localization errors of BMAVs, and allocating resources of AMAVs considering interconnected influential factors. This work introduces TransformLoc, a new framework that transforms AMAVs into mobile localization infrastructures, specifically designed for low-cost and resource-constrained BMAVs. We design an error-aware joint location estimation model to perform intermittent joint estimation for BMAVs and introduce a similarity-instructed adaptive grouping-scheduling strategy to allocate resources of AMAVs dynamically. TransformLoc achieves a collaborative, adaptive, and cost-effective localization system suitable for large-scale heterogeneous MAV swarms. We implement and validate TransformLoc on industrial drones. Results show it outperforms all baselines by up to 68\% in localization performance, improving navigation success rates by 60\%. Extensive robustness and ablation experiments further highlight the superiority of its design.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.08408 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Introduction of a heterogeneous MAV swarm composed of two [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Motivating example. (a) BMAVs contend with constrained on [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Demonstration of the TransformLoc framework. Initially, BMAVs estimate locations amidst noisy measurements. Leveraging an uncertainty￾aided inference method, AMAV generates intermittent observations to facilitate intermittent joint location estimation for BMAVs. Following this, TransformLoc optimizes resource allocation for AMAVs through adaptive grouping and scheduling. This entails dynamically grouping MAVs and su… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (8 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The error-aware joint pose estimation model operates as follows: [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The similarity-instructed adaptive grouping-scheduling strategy aims to address the resource allocation challenge. Initially, it leverages the Voronoi diagram to group MAVs, effectively decoupling the resource allocation problem. Subsequently, the strategy constructs s…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Experimental Setup and Implementation of Heterogeneous MAV Swarm. AMAVs utilize tracking cameras for localization and visual sensors for observation generation. BMAVs are equipped with AprilTag markers for recognition and localization. Ground truth data is obtained fro…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Overall performance in in-field experiments with two AMAVs and six BMAVs. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Overall performance in physical feature-based simulation with five AMAVs and twenty BMAVs. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: System Robustness Evaluation with five AMAVs and twenty BMAVs. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: System Micro-benchmark BMAVs, TransformLoc consistently achieves an ATE of less than 1.2m. This result is more than 57% lower than any other baseline method. These experimental findings high￾light the efficacy of TransformLoc in efficiently distribut￾ing the sensing r…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: System efficiency 5.5.2 Correlation of ATE and indicator To gauge the efficacy of the indicator, we delve deeper into the insights provided by Fig. 11b. The visual representation of the indicator (tr(Σj,t)) unveils a conspicuous association with the ATE of BMAVs. This…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

95 extracted references · 79 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Transformloc: Transforming mavs into mobile localization infrastructures in heterogeneous swarms

    H. Wang, J. Xu, C. Zhao, Z. Lu, Y. Cheng, X. Chen, X.-P . Zhang, Y. Liu, and X. Chen, “Transformloc: Transforming mavs into mobile localization infrastructures in heterogeneous swarms.”

  2. [2]

    Socialdrone: An inte- grated social media and drone sensing system for reliable disaster response,

    M. T. Rashid, D. Y. Zhang, and D. Wang, “Socialdrone: An inte- grated social media and drone sensing system for reliable disaster response,” in Proceedings of the IEEE INFOCOM, 2020, pp. 218–227

    2020

  3. [3]

    Sniffy bug: A fully autonomous swarm of gas-seeking nano quadcopters in cluttered environments,

    B. P . Duisterhof, S. Li, J. Burgu ´es, V . J. Reddi, and G. C. de Croon, “Sniffy bug: A fully autonomous swarm of gas-seeking nano quadcopters in cluttered environments,” in 2021 IEEE/RSJ Inter- national Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) . IEEE, 2021, pp. 9099–9106

    2021

  4. [4]

    Gas source localization and mapping with mobile robots: A review,

    A. Francis, S. Li, C. Griffiths, and J. Sienz, “Gas source localization and mapping with mobile robots: A review,” Journal of Field Robotics, vol. 39, no. 8, pp. 1341–1373, 2022

    2022

  5. [5]

    Odor source localization algorithms on mobile robots: A review and future outlook,

    X.-x. Chen and J. Huang, “Odor source localization algorithms on mobile robots: A review and future outlook,” Robotics and Autonomous Systems, vol. 112, pp. 123–136, 2019

    2019

  6. [6]

    Heuristic algorithms for co-scheduling of edge analytics and routes for uav fleet missions,

    A. Khochare, Y. Simmhan, F. B. Sorbelli, and S. K. Das, “Heuristic algorithms for co-scheduling of edge analytics and routes for uav fleet missions,” in Processings of IEEE INFOCOM, 2021, pp. 1–10

    2021

  7. [7]

    Swarmcontrol: An automated dis- tributed control framework for self-optimizing drone networks,

    L. Bertizzolo, S. D’oro, L. Ferranti, L. Bonati, E. Demirors, Z. Guan, T. Melodia, and S. Pudlewski, “Swarmcontrol: An automated dis- tributed control framework for self-optimizing drone networks,” in Proceedings of the IEEE INFOCOM, 2020, pp. 1768–1777

    2020

  8. [8]

    Lifesaving with res- cuechain: Energy-efficient and partition-tolerant blockchain based secure information sharing for uav-aided disaster rescue,

    Y. Wang, Z. Su, Q. Xu, R. Li, and T. H. Luan, “Lifesaving with res- cuechain: Energy-efficient and partition-tolerant blockchain based secure information sharing for uav-aided disaster rescue,” in Processings of the IEEE INFOCOM, 2021, pp. 1–10

    2021

Show all 95 references
  1. [9]

    Physical layer secure communications based on collaborative beamforming for uav networks: A multi-objective optimization approach,

    J. Li, H. Kang, G. Sun, S. Liang, Y. Liu, and Y. Zhang, “Physical layer secure communications based on collaborative beamforming for uav networks: A multi-objective optimization approach,” in Processings of the IEEE INFOCOM, 2021, pp. 1–10

    2021

  2. [10]

    Global drones market outlook (2022-2032),

    “Global drones market outlook (2022-2032),” https://www. factmr.com/report/62/drone-market

    2022

  3. [11]

    Joint training and resource allocation optimization for federated learning in uav swarm,

    Y. Shen, Y. Qu, C. Dong, F. Zhou, and Q. Wu, “Joint training and resource allocation optimization for federated learning in uav swarm,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 10, no. 3, 2022

    2022

  4. [12]

    H- swarmloc: Efficient scheduling for localization of heterogeneous mav swarm with deep reinforcement learning,

    H. Wang, X. Chen, Y. Cheng, C. Wu, F. Dang, and X. Chen, “H- swarmloc: Efficient scheduling for localization of heterogeneous mav swarm with deep reinforcement learning,” in Proceedings of the 20th ACM Sensys, 2022, pp. 1148–1154

    2022

  5. [13]

    Intelligent resource allocation schemes for uav-swarm-based cooperative sensing,

    T. Li, S. Leng, Z. Wang, K. Zhang, and L. Zhou, “Intelligent resource allocation schemes for uav-swarm-based cooperative sensing,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal , vol. 9, no. 21, pp. 21 570– 21 582, 2022

    2022

  6. [14]

    A computational model- driven hybrid social media and drone-based wildfire monitoring framework,

    M. T. Rashid, D. Zhang, and D. Wang, “A computational model- driven hybrid social media and drone-based wildfire monitoring framework,” in Proceedings of the IEEE INFOCOM WKSHPS , 2020, pp. 1362–1363

    2020

  7. [15]

    Intelli-eye: An uav tracking system with optimized machine learning tasks offloading,

    B. Yang, H.-H. Wu, X. Cao, X. Li, T. Kroecker, Z. Han, and L. Qian, “Intelli-eye: An uav tracking system with optimized machine learning tasks offloading,” in Proceedings of the IEEE INFOCOM WKSHPS, 2019, pp. 1–6

    2019

  8. [16]

    When uavs ride a bus: Towards energy- efficient city-scale video surveillance,

    A. Trotta, F. D. Andreagiovanni, M. Di Felice, E. Natalizio, and K. R. Chowdhury, “When uavs ride a bus: Towards energy- efficient city-scale video surveillance,” in Processings of the IEEE INFOCOM, 2018, pp. 1043–1051

    2018

  9. [17]

    The euroc micro aerial vehicle datasets,

    M. Burri, J. Nikolic, P . Gohl, T. Schneider, J. Rehder, S. Omari, M. W. Achtelik, and R. Siegwart, “The euroc micro aerial vehicle datasets,” The International Journal of Robotics Research , vol. 35, no. 10, pp. 1157–1163, 2016

    2016

  10. [18]

    Ccm-slam: Robust and efficient cen- tralized collaborative monocular simultaneous localization and mapping for robotic teams,

    P . Schmuck and M. Chli, “Ccm-slam: Robust and efficient cen- tralized collaborative monocular simultaneous localization and mapping for robotic teams,” Journal of Field Robotics, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 763–781, 2019

    2019

  11. [19]

    Smoothlander: A quadrotor landing control system with smooth trajectory guarantee based on reinforcement learning,

    C. Zhao, H. Wang, J. Li, F. Man, S. Mu, W. Ding, X.-P . Zhang, and X. Chen, “Smoothlander: A quadrotor landing control system with smooth trajectory guarantee based on reinforcement learning,” in Proceedings of the Ubicomp, 2023, pp. 682–687

    2023

  12. [20]

    Edge assisted mobile semantic visual slam,

    J. Xu, H. Cao, D. Li, K. Huang, C. Qian, L. Shangguan, and Z. Yang, “Edge assisted mobile semantic visual slam,” in Proceedings of the IEEE INFOCOM, April 27-30 2020

    2020

  13. [21]

    Authentication for drone delivery through a novel way of using face biometrics,

    J. Sharp, C. Wu, and Q. Zeng, “Authentication for drone delivery through a novel way of using face biometrics,” in Proceedings of the 28th ACM MobiCom, 2022, pp. 609–622

    2022

  14. [22]

    Tracking drone orientation with multiple gps receivers,

    M. Gowda, J. Manweiler, A. Dhekne, R. R. Choudhury, and J. D. Weisz, “Tracking drone orientation with multiple gps receivers,” in Proceedings of the 22nd ACM MobiCom , 2016, pp. 280–293

    2016

  15. [23]

    Micnest: Long-range instant acoustic localization of drones in precise landing,

    W. Wang, L. Mottola, Y. He, J. Li, Y. Sun, S. Li, H. Jing, and Y. Wang, “Micnest: Long-range instant acoustic localization of drones in precise landing,” in Proceedings of the 20th ACM SenSys , 2022

    2022

  16. [24]

    Train once, locate anytime for anyone: Adversarial learning based wireless localization,

    D. Li, J. Xu, Z. Yang, Y. Lu, Q. Zhang, and X. Zhang, “Train once, locate anytime for anyone: Adversarial learning based wireless localization,” in Proceedings of the IEEE INFOCOM, May 10-13 2021

    2021

  17. [25]

    Wi- drone: Wi-fi-based 6-dof tracking for indoor drone flight control,

    G. Chi, Z. Yang, J. Xu, C. Wu, J. Zhang, J. Liang, and Y. Liu, “Wi- drone: Wi-fi-based 6-dof tracking for indoor drone flight control,” in Proceedings of the ACM MobiSys, 2022

    2022

  18. [26]

    Drunkwalk: Collaborative and adaptive planning for navigation of micro-aerial sensor swarms,

    X. Chen, A. Purohit, C. R. Dominguez, S. Carpin, and P . Zhang, “Drunkwalk: Collaborative and adaptive planning for navigation of micro-aerial sensor swarms,” in Proceedings of the 13th ACM Sensys, 2015, pp. 295–308

    2015

  19. [27]

    Swarmmap: Scaling up real-time collaborative visual slam at the edge,

    J. Xu, H. Cao, Z. Yang, L. Shangguan, J. Zhang, X. He, and Y. Liu, “Swarmmap: Scaling up real-time collaborative visual slam at the edge,” in Proceedings of the USENIX NSDI, 2022, pp. 977–993

    2022

  20. [28]

    Coded hyperspectral image reconstruction using deep external and internal learning,

    Y. Fu, T. Zhang, L. Wang, and H. Huang, “Coded hyperspectral image reconstruction using deep external and internal learning,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence , vol. 44, no. 7, pp. 3404–3420, 2021

    2021

  21. [29]

    Latent diffusion enhanced rectangle transformer for hyperspectral image restoration,

    M. Li, Y. Fu, T. Zhang, J. Liu, D. Dou, C. Yan, and Y. Zhang, “Latent diffusion enhanced rectangle transformer for hyperspectral image restoration,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2024

    2024

  22. [30]

    Combining imu with acoustics for head motion tracking lever- aging wireless earphone,

    J. Hu, H. Jiang, D. Liu, Z. Xiao, Q. Zhang, J. Liu, and S. Dustdar, “Combining imu with acoustics for head motion tracking lever- aging wireless earphone,” IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing , 2023

    2023

  23. [31]

    Leovr: Motion-inspired visual-lidar fusion for environment depth esti- mation,

    D. Li, J. Xu, Z. Yang, Q. Ma, L. Zhang, and P . Chen, “Leovr: Motion-inspired visual-lidar fusion for environment depth esti- mation,” IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 2023

    2023

  24. [32]

    See through smoke: robust indoor mapping with low-cost mmwave radar,

    C. X. Lu, S. Rosa, P . Zhao, B. Wang, C. Chen, J. A. Stankovic, N. Trigoni, and A. Markham, “See through smoke: robust indoor mapping with low-cost mmwave radar,” in Proceedings of the 18th MobiSys, 2020, pp. 14–27

    2020

  25. [33]

    milliego: single- chip mmwave radar aided egomotion estimation via deep sensor fusion,

    C. X. Lu, M. R. U. Saputra, P . Zhao, Y. Almalioglu, P . P . De Gusmao, C. Chen, K. Sun, N. Trigoni, and A. Markham, “milliego: single- chip mmwave radar aided egomotion estimation via deep sensor fusion,” in Proceedings of the 18th Sensys, 2020, pp. 109–122. IEEE TRANSACTIONS...

    2020

  26. [34]

    Pair-navi: Peer-to-peer indoor navigation with mobile visual slam,

    E. Dong, J. Xu, C. Wu, Y. Liu, and Z. Yang, “Pair-navi: Peer-to-peer indoor navigation with mobile visual slam,” in Proceedings of the IEEE INFOCOM, April 29-May 2 2019

    2019

  27. [35]

    Low-light raw video denoising with a high-quality realistic motion dataset,

    Y. Fu, Z. Wang, T. Zhang, and J. Zhang, “Low-light raw video denoising with a high-quality realistic motion dataset,” IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, vol. 25, pp. 8119–8131, 2022

    2022

  28. [36]

    Deep guided attention network for joint denoising and demosaicing in real image,

    T. Zhang, Y. Fu, J. Zhang, and C. Yan, “Deep guided attention network for joint denoising and demosaicing in real image,” Chinese Journal of Electronics, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 303–312, 2024

    2024

  29. [37]

    Physics-based noise mod- eling for extreme low-light photography,

    K. Wei, Y. Fu, Y. Zheng, and J. Yang, “Physics-based noise mod- eling for extreme low-light photography,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence , vol. 44, no. 11, pp. 8520– 8537, 2021

    2021

  30. [38]

    Edge assisted mobile semantic visual slam,

    H. Cao, J. Xu, D. Li, L. Shangguan, Y. Liu, and Z. Yang, “Edge assisted mobile semantic visual slam,” IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 2022

    2022

  31. [39]

    Apriltag 2: Efficient and robust fiducial detection,

    J. Wang and E. Olson, “Apriltag 2: Efficient and robust fiducial detection,” in Processings of the IEEE IROS, 2016, pp. 4193–4198

    2016

  32. [40]

    Fol- lowupar: Enabling follow-up effects in mobile ar applications,

    J. Xu, G. Chi, Z. Yang, D. Li, Q. Zhang, Q. Ma, and X. Miao, “Fol- lowupar: Enabling follow-up effects in mobile ar applications,” in Proceedings of the ACM MobiSys, June 24-July 2 2021

    2021

  33. [41]

    Sugarmap: Location-less cov- erage for micro-aerial sensing swarms,

    A. Purohit, Z. Sun, and P . Zhang, “Sugarmap: Location-less cov- erage for micro-aerial sensing swarms,” in Proceedings of the ACM Sensys, 2013, pp. 253–264

    2013

  34. [42]

    H-drunkwalk: Collaborative and adaptive navigation for heterogeneous mav swarm,

    X. Chen, C. Ruiz, S. Zeng, L. Gao, A. Purohit, S. Carpin, and P . Zhang, “H-drunkwalk: Collaborative and adaptive navigation for heterogeneous mav swarm,” ACM Transactions on Sensor Net- works, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 1–27, 2020

    2020

  35. [43]

    Ucinski, Optimal measurement methods for distributed parameter system identification

    D. Ucinski, Optimal measurement methods for distributed parameter system identification. CRC press, 2004

    2004

  36. [44]

    Voronoi diagrams—a survey of a fundamental geometric data structure,

    F. Aurenhammer, “Voronoi diagrams—a survey of a fundamental geometric data structure,” ACM CSUR, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 345–405, 1991

    1991

  37. [45]

    On effi- cient sensor scheduling for linear dynamical systems,

    M. P . Vitus, W. Zhang, A. Abate, J. Hu, and C. J. Tomlin, “On effi- cient sensor scheduling for linear dynamical systems,” Automatica, vol. 48, no. 10, pp. 2482–2493, 2012

    2012

  38. [46]

    Information acquisition with sensing robots: Algorithms and error bounds,

    N. Atanasov, J. Le Ny, K. Daniilidis, and G. J. Pappas, “Information acquisition with sensing robots: Algorithms and error bounds,” in Processings of the IEEE ICRA, 2014, pp. 6447–6454

    2014

  39. [47]

    Borenstein, H

    J. Borenstein, H. Everett, and L. Feng, Navigating mobile robots: Systems and techniques. AK Peters, Ltd., 1996

    1996

  40. [48]

    Learning multi-agent coordination for enhancing target coverage in directional sensor networks,

    J. Xu, F. Zhong, and Y. Wang, “Learning multi-agent coordination for enhancing target coverage in directional sensor networks,” Processings of the NeurIPS, vol. 33, pp. 10 053–10 064, 2020

    2020

  41. [49]

    Fiducial markers for pose estimation: Overview, applications and experimental comparison of the artag, apriltag, aruco and stag markers,

    M. Kalaitzakis, B. Cain, S. Carroll, A. Ambrosi, C. Whitehead, and N. Vitzilaios, “Fiducial markers for pose estimation: Overview, applications and experimental comparison of the artag, apriltag, aruco and stag markers,” Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems , vol. 101, pp....

    2021

  42. [50]

    Asc: Actuation system for city-wide crowdsensing with ride-sharing vehicular platform,

    X. Chen, S. Xu, H. Fu, C. Joe-Wong, L. Zhang, H. Y. Noh, and P . Zhang, “Asc: Actuation system for city-wide crowdsensing with ride-sharing vehicular platform,” in Proceedings of the Fourth Work- shop on International Science of Smart City Operations and Platforms Engineering,...

    2019

  43. [51]

    Deliversense: Efficient delivery drone scheduling for crowdsens- ing with deep reinforcement learning,

    X. Chen, H. Wang, Z. Li, W. Ding, F. Dang, C. Wu, and X. Chen, “Deliversense: Efficient delivery drone scheduling for crowdsens- ing with deep reinforcement learning,” inAdjunct Proceedings of the 2022 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing an...

    2022

  44. [52]

    Quest: Quality-informed multi-agent dispatching system for op- timal mobile crowdsensing,

    Z. Li, F. Man, X. Chen, S. Xu, F. Dang, X.-P . Zhang, and X. Chen, “Quest: Quality-informed multi-agent dispatching system for op- timal mobile crowdsensing,” in IEEE INFOCOM 2024-IEEE Con- ference on Computer Communications. IEEE, 2024, pp. 1811–1820

    2024

  45. [53]

    Ddl: Empowering delivery drones with large-scale urban sensing capability,

    X. Chen, H. Wang, Y. Cheng, H. Fu, Y. Liu, F. Dang, Y. Liu, J. Cui, and X. Chen, “Ddl: Empowering delivery drones with large-scale urban sensing capability,” IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, 2024

    2024

  46. [54]

    Joint deployment of truck-drone systems for camera-based object monitoring,

    L. Wang, W. Wang, H. Dai, Y. Qu, J. Zheng, R. Gu, G. Chen, and X. Fu, “Joint deployment of truck-drone systems for camera-based object monitoring,” IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, no. 01, pp. 1–18, 2024

    2024

  47. [55]

    Motion inspires notion: self-supervised visual-lidar fusion for environment depth estimation,

    D. Li, J. Xu, Z. Yang, Q. Zhang, Q. Ma, L. Zhang, and P . Chen, “Motion inspires notion: self-supervised visual-lidar fusion for environment depth estimation,” in Proceedings of the 20th MobiSys, 2022, pp. 114–127

    2022

  48. [56]

    Ultra-wideband swarm ranging,

    F. Shan, J. Zeng, Z. Li, J. Luo, and W. Wu, “Ultra-wideband swarm ranging,” in Processings of the IEEE INFOCOM, 2021, pp. 1–10

    2021

  49. [57]

    Sardo: An automated search-and-rescue drone-based solution for victims localization,

    A. Albanese, V . Sciancalepore, and X. Costa-P ´erez, “Sardo: An automated search-and-rescue drone-based solution for victims localization,” IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, vol. 21, no. 9, pp. 3312–3325, 2021

    2021

  50. [58]

    ilocus: Incentivizing vehicle mobility to optimize sensing distri- bution in crowd sensing,

    S. Xu, X. Chen, X. Pi, C. Joe-Wong, P . Zhang, and H. Y. Noh, “ilocus: Incentivizing vehicle mobility to optimize sensing distri- bution in crowd sensing,” IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing , vol. 19, no. 8, pp. 1831–1847, 2019

    2019

  51. [59]

    Pas: Prediction-based actuation system for city-scale ridesharing vehicular mobile crowdsensing,

    X. Chen, S. Xu, J. Han, H. Fu, X. Pi, C. Joe-Wong, Y. Li, L. Zhang, H. Y. Noh, and P . Zhang, “Pas: Prediction-based actuation system for city-scale ridesharing vehicular mobile crowdsensing,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 3719–3734, 2020

    2020

  52. [60]

    Minimal navigation solution for a swarm of tiny flying robots to explore an unknown environment,

    K. McGuire, C. De Wagter, K. Tuyls, H. Kappen, and G. C. de Croon, “Minimal navigation solution for a swarm of tiny flying robots to explore an unknown environment,” Science Robotics , vol. 4, no. 35, p. eaaw9710, 2019

    2019

  53. [61]

    Mobiair: Unleashing sensor mobility for city-scale and fine-grained air-quality monitoring with airbert,

    Y. Liu, H. Wang, F. Man, J. Xu, F. Dang, Y. Liu, X.-P . Zhang, and X. Chen, “Mobiair: Unleashing sensor mobility for city-scale and fine-grained air-quality monitoring with airbert,” in Proceedings of the 22nd Annual International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applica- tions a...

    2024

  54. [62]

    Scheduling uav swarm with attention-based graph reinforcement learning for ground-to-air heterogeneous data communication,

    J. Ren, Y. Xu, Z. Li, C. Hong, X.-P . Zhang, and X. Chen, “Scheduling uav swarm with attention-based graph reinforcement learning for ground-to-air heterogeneous data communication,” in Adjunct Proceedings of the 2023 ACM International Joint Conference on Per- vasive and Ubiqu...

    2023

  55. [63]

    Analysis of drone assisted network coded cooperation for next generation wireless network,

    P . Kumar, P . Singh, S. Darshi, and S. Shailendra, “Analysis of drone assisted network coded cooperation for next generation wireless network,” IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 93–103, 2019

    2019

  56. [64]

    Coverage optimization with a dynamic network of drone relays,

    E. Arribas, V . Mancuso, and V . Cholvi, “Coverage optimization with a dynamic network of drone relays,” IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, vol. 19, no. 10, pp. 2278–2298, 2019

    2019

  57. [65]

    Emergency networking using uavs: A reinforcement learning approach with large language model,

    Y. Xu, Z. Jian, J. Zha, and X. Chen, “Emergency networking using uavs: A reinforcement learning approach with large language model,” in In Processings of 2024 23rd ACM/IEEE IPSN . IEEE, 2024, pp. 281–282

    2024

  58. [66]

    Predictive estimation of optimal signal strength from drones over iot frameworks in smart cities,

    S. H. Alsamhi, F. A. Almalki, O. Ma, M. S. Ansari, and B. Lee, “Predictive estimation of optimal signal strength from drones over iot frameworks in smart cities,” IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 402–416, 2021

    2021

  59. [67]

    Tagging iot data in a drone view,

    L. Da Van, C. H. Chang, K. L. Tong, K. R. Wu, L. Y. Zhang, and Y. C. Tseng, “Tagging iot data in a drone view,” in Proceedings of the ACM MobiCom, 2019

    2019

  60. [68]

    Intelligent uav swarm cooperation for multiple targets tracking,

    L. Zhou, S. Leng, Q. Liu, and Q. Wang, “Intelligent uav swarm cooperation for multiple targets tracking,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 743–754, 2021

    2021

  61. [69]

    Localization and clustering based on swarm intelligence in uav networks for emergency communica- tions,

    M. Y. Arafat and S. Moh, “Localization and clustering based on swarm intelligence in uav networks for emergency communica- tions,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 6, no. 5, 2019

    2019

  62. [70]

    Soscheduler: Toward proactive and adaptive wildfire suppression via multi-uav collaborative scheduling,

    X. Chen, Z. Xiao, Y. Cheng, C. Hsia, H. Wang, J. Xu, S. Xu, F. Dang, X.-P . Zhang, Y. Liuet al., “Soscheduler: Toward proactive and adaptive wildfire suppression via multi-uav collaborative scheduling,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 2024

    2024

  63. [71]

    Orb-slam: a versatile and accurate monocular slam system,

    R. Mur-Artal, J. M. M. Montiel, and J. D. Tardos, “Orb-slam: a versatile and accurate monocular slam system,” IEEE transactions on robotics, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 1147–1163, 2015

    2015

  64. [72]

    Monoslam: Real-time single camera slam,

    A. J. Davison, I. D. Reid, N. D. Molton, and O. Stasse, “Monoslam: Real-time single camera slam,” IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 1052–1067, 2007

    2007

  65. [73]

    Lvcp: Lidar-vision tightly coupled collaborative real-time relative positioning,

    Z. Jian, Q. Li, S. Zheng, X. Wang, and X. Chen, “Lvcp: Lidar-vision tightly coupled collaborative real-time relative positioning,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.10782, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  66. [74]

    Swarm of micro flying robots in the wild,

    X. Zhou, X. Wen, Z. Wang, Y. Gao, H. Li, Q. Wang, T. Yang, H. Lu, Y. Cao, C. Xu et al., “Swarm of micro flying robots in the wild,” Science Robotics, vol. 7, no. 66, p. eabm5954, 2022

    2022

  67. [75]

    Design experiences in minimalistic flying sensor node platform through sensorfly,

    X. Chen, A. Purohit, S. Pan, C. Ruiz, J. Han, Z. Sun, F. Mokaya, P . Tague, and P . Zhang, “Design experiences in minimalistic flying sensor node platform through sensorfly,” ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks (TOSN), vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 1–37, 2017

    2017

  68. [76]

    Racer: Rapid collaborative explo- ration with a decentralized multi-uav system,

    B. Zhou, H. Xu, and S. Shen, “Racer: Rapid collaborative explo- ration with a decentralized multi-uav system,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 2023. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MOBILE COMPUTING 17

    2023

  69. [77]

    Deepgps: Deep learning en- hanced gps positioning in urban canyons,

    Z. Liu, J. Liu, X. Xu, and K. Wu, “Deepgps: Deep learning en- hanced gps positioning in urban canyons,” IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 376–392, 2022

    2022

  70. [78]

    Indoor drone localization and tracking based on acoustic inertial mea- surement,

    Y. Sun, W. Wang, L. Mottola, Z. Jia, R. Wang, and Y. He, “Indoor drone localization and tracking based on acoustic inertial mea- surement,” IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing , vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 7537–7551, 2024

    2024

  71. [79]

    Acoustic localization system for precise drone landing,

    Y. He, W. Wang, L. Mottola, S. Li, Y. Sun, J. Li, H. Jing, T. Wang, and Y. Wang, “Acoustic localization system for precise drone landing,” IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, vol. 23, no. 5, 2024

    2024

  72. [80]

    Rf- diffusion: Radio signal generation via time-frequency diffusion,

    G. Chi, Z. Yang, C. Wu, J. Xu, Y. Gao, Y. Liu, and T. X. Han, “Rf- diffusion: Radio signal generation via time-frequency diffusion,” in Proceedings of the 30th ACM MobiCom , 2024, pp. 77–92

    2024

  73. [81]

    Zero-effort cross-domain gesture recognition with wi- fi,

    Y. Zheng, Y. Zhang, K. Qian, G. Zhang, Y. Liu, C. Wu, and Z. Yang, “Zero-effort cross-domain gesture recognition with wi- fi,” in Proceedings of the 17th ACM MobiSys , 2019, pp. 313–325

    2019

  74. [82]

    Wepos: Weak-supervised indoor positioning with unlabeled wifi for on-demand delivery,

    B. Guo, W. Zuo, S. Wang, W. Lyu, Z. Hong, Y. Ding, T. He, and D. Zhang, “Wepos: Weak-supervised indoor positioning with unlabeled wifi for on-demand delivery,” Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies , vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 1–25, 2022

    2022

  75. [83]

    Millisign: mmwave-based passive signs for guiding uavs in poor visibility conditions,

    T. Iizuka, T. Sasatani, T. Nakamura, N. Kosaka, M. Hisada, and Y. Kawahara, “Millisign: mmwave-based passive signs for guiding uavs in poor visibility conditions,” in Proceedings of the 29th ACM MobiCom, 2023, pp. 1–15

    2023

  76. [84]

    Com- puter vision-assisted 3d object localization via cots rfid devices and a monocular camera,

    Z. Wang, M. Xu, N. Ye, F. Xiao, R. Wang, and H. Huang, “Com- puter vision-assisted 3d object localization via cots rfid devices and a monocular camera,” IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 893–908, 2019

    2019

  77. [85]

    Accurate indoor localiza- tion with zero start-up cost,

    S. Kumar, S. Gil, D. Katabi, and D. Rus, “Accurate indoor localiza- tion with zero start-up cost,” in Proceedings of the ACM MobiCom , 2014, pp. 483–494

    2014

  78. [86]

    Path gen- eration for wheeled robots autonomous navigation on vegetated terrain,

    Z. Jian, Z. Liu, H. Shao, X. Wang, X. Chen, and B. Liang, “Path gen- eration for wheeled robots autonomous navigation on vegetated terrain,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 2023

    2023

  79. [87]

    Singhal and S

    C. Singhal and S. De, Resource allocation in next-generation broadband wireless access networks. IGI Global, 2017

    2017

  80. [88]

    Localization and clustering based on swarm intelligence in uav networks for emergency communica- tions,

    M. Y. Arafat and S. Moh, “Localization and clustering based on swarm intelligence in uav networks for emergency communica- tions,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal , vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 8958–8976, 2019

    2019

  81. [89]

    Gcrl: Efficient delivery area assignment for last-mile logistics with group-based coop- erative reinforcement learning,

    H. Wang, S. Wang, Y. Yang, and D. Zhang, “Gcrl: Efficient delivery area assignment for last-mile logistics with group-based coop- erative reinforcement learning,” in 2023 IEEE 39th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE). IEEE, 2023, pp. 3522–3534

    2023

  82. [90]

    Learning q-network for active information acquisition,

    H. Jeong, B. Schlotfeldt, H. Hassani, M. Morari, D. D. Lee, and G. J. Pappas, “Learning q-network for active information acquisition,” in 2019 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). IEEE, 2019, pp. 6822–6827

    2019

  83. [91]

    Capacity augmentation in wireless mesh networks,

    U. Ashraf, “Capacity augmentation in wireless mesh networks,” IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing , vol. 14, no. 7, pp. 1344– 1354, 2014

    2014

  84. [92]

    Catch me if you can: Deep meta-rl for search-and-rescue using lora uav networks,

    M. N. Soorki, H. Aghajari, S. Ahmadinabi, H. B. Babadegani, C. Chaccour, and W. Saad, “Catch me if you can: Deep meta-rl for search-and-rescue using lora uav networks,” IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 2024

    2024

  85. [93]

    Streaming from the air: Enabling drone- sourced video streaming applications on 5g open-ran architec- tures,

    L. Bertizzolo, T. X. Tran, J. Buczek, B. Balasubramanian, R. Jana, Y. Zhou, and T. Melodia, “Streaming from the air: Enabling drone- sourced video streaming applications on 5g open-ran architec- tures,” IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing , vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 3004–3016, 2021

    2021

  86. [94]

    Califormer: Leveraging unlabeled measurements to calibrate sensors with self- supervised learning,

    H. Wang, Y. Liu, C. Zhao, J. He, W. Ding, and X. Chen, “Califormer: Leveraging unlabeled measurements to calibrate sensors with self- supervised learning,” in In Proceedings of the 2023 ACM UbiComp , 2023, pp. 743–748. Haoyang Wang received the B.E. degree from the School of C...

    2023

  87. [2022]

    degree at Shenzhen International Graduate School, Ts- inghua University, Shenzhen, China

    He is currently pursuing an M.S. degree at Shenzhen International Graduate School, Ts- inghua University, Shenzhen, China. His re- search interests encompass cyber-physical sys- tems and collaborative multi-agent robotic mo- tion scheduling. Xuecheng Chen received the B.E. deg...

    2021

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.