Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 51 references

Resonant frequencies distribution for multiple closely spaced subwavelength resonators

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Arrangement alone sets resonant frequencies of packed spheres

desk verdict Useful N>2 spectral reduction for closely spaced resonators, but the missing factor of R in the capacitance asymptotics makes the explicit frequency formulas for i≥2 dimensionally wrong. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.08522 v1 pith:RWZCE6YF submitted 2025-06-10 math.AP

Haigang Li , Junhua Zhang This is my paper
classification math.AP MSC 35P0535B4035J05
keywords subwavelengthresonancecapacitancematrixresonatorarrangementresonantfrequencydistributionToeplitzcirculantgradientblow-upMinnaert
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper considers $N>2$ identical spherical resonators packed extremely close together in a line, a ring, or a rectangular grid, and asks how the arrangement shapes the subwavelength resonant frequencies. It proves that, as the density contrast becomes large and the gaps shrink exponentially fast, the leading-order frequencies are completely determined by the geometry through explicit eigenvalues of simple structured matrices: a Toeplitz matrix for the chain, a circulant matrix for the ring, and a block-Toeplitz matrix for the grid. The results show that a chain gives $N$ well-separated frequencies, a ring degenerates pairs of frequencies into fewer distinct resonances, and a grid broadens the frequency span while losing some distinct frequencies. The same analysis yields the resonant modes and identifies which gaps between resonators exhibit a slower gradient blow-up, pointing to where energy concentrates.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the capacitance matrix $C$ with entries $C_{ij} = \int_\Omega \nabla v_i \cdot \nabla v_j \, dx$, where $v_i$ is the harmonic potential equal to 1 on resonator $i$ and 0 on the others. The paper uses the reduction $\omega_i = \sqrt{\delta v_b^2 \lambda_i/|D_i|}$ so that resonant frequencies are square roots of eigenvalues of the generalized capacitance matrix. For close-to-touching spheres, $C$ has the entry-wise asymptotic form: diagonal entries are $2\pi|\log \varepsilon|+O(1)$ ($\pi|\log \varepsilon|$ at the two ends of a chain), nearest-neighbor off-diagonals are $-\pi|\log \varepsilon|+O(1)$, and all other entries are $O(1)$. Substituting this structure into $\det(C-\lambda I)$ reduces the eigenvalue problem to a Toeplitz (chain), circulant (ring), or block-Toeplitz (matrix) determinant, whose roots are obtained from trigonometric identities; the average capacity $M$ then fixes the lowest eigenvalue.

What would settle it

Compute the capacitance matrix $C$ numerically for a chain of $N=4$ spheres of radius $R=1$ at separations $\varepsilon=10^{-4}, 10^{-5}, 10^{-6}$ and test whether $C_{13}$ stays $O(1)$ as $|\log \varepsilon|$ grows; Proposition 3.1(iii) predicts it does, and if $C_{13}$ instead grows like $|\log \varepsilon|$ the Toeplitz model $A$ is wrong. As a direct check of Theorem 1.1, solve the Helmholtz problem (1.1) for the same chain and compare the ratios $\omega_2:\omega_3:\omega_4$ to $\sqrt{2-\sqrt{2}}:\sqrt{2}:\sqrt{2+\sqrt{2}}$.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that, for $N$ identical spherical resonators of radius $R$ at separation $\varepsilon$ with $\varepsilon = e^{-\Lambda/\delta^{1-\beta}}$, the subwavelength resonant frequencies of the Helmholtz resonance problem have explicit leading-order asymptotics. In every arrangement the lowest frequency is $\omega_1 = \sqrt{3 v_b^2 M \delta/(4\pi R^3)}(1+o(1))$, while the remaining frequencies obey $\omega_i = \sqrt{3 v_b^2 a_i \delta |\log \varepsilon|/(4 R^3)} + O(\sqrt{\delta/|\log \varepsilon|}+\delta)$ for $i=2,\ldots,N$, where the coefficients $a_i$ are the eigenvalues of the matrix $A$ for a chain, $\hat A$ for a ring, or the block-Toeplitz matrix $\tilde A$ for an $m\times n$ grid. For a chain these coefficients are $a_i^N = 2(1-\cos((i-1)\pi/N))$; for a ring they are $\hat a_i^N = 2(1-\cos(2(i-1)\pi/N))$ with double multiplicity; for a grid they are the distinct sums $a_\gamma^m + a_\alpha^n$. The paper further shows the resonant modes are approximately constant on each resonator with values given by the corresponding eigenvectors, and that the gradient of a mode blows up like $1/\varepsilon$ except in specific gaps where the rate drops to $1/(\varepsilon|\log \varepsilon|)$.

Load-bearing premise

The entire derivation rests on the capacitance matrix's entry-wise asymptotics—only nearest-neighbor pairs contribute $|\log \varepsilon|$, all farther pairs only $O(1)$—so any hidden $|\log \varepsilon|$ term from next-nearest-neighbor interactions would destroy the formulas.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In a chain of $N$ identical close-to-touching resonators, the leading-order spectrum consists of $N$ distinct frequencies given by $\omega_1 = \sqrt{3 v_b^2 M \delta/(4\pi R^3)}$ and $\omega_i = \sqrt{3 v_b^2 (2-2\cos((i-1)\pi/N)) \delta|\log \varepsilon|/(4R^3)}$ for $i=2,\ldots,N$, making the chain a natural multifrequency filter.
  • A ring array has the same overall frequency span as a chain but only about half as many distinct frequencies, because each nontrivial leading-order eigenvalue has multiplicity two; when $N$ is even there is an additional mode reaching the top of the shared range.
  • An $m\times n$ matrix array spans a frequency interval $\sqrt{2}$ times wider than the chain (up to $2\sqrt{2}\eta$), but the number of distinct leading-order frequencies equals the number of distinct values $a_\gamma^m+a_\alpha^n$, which is no larger than $N$.
  • In the chain, the gradient of a resonant mode blows up at the faster rate $1/\varepsilon$ except in the gap between resonators $l$ and $l+1$ when $l(i-1)$ is a multiple of $N$, where the rate is only $1/(\varepsilon|\log \varepsilon|)$; this gives a spatial criterion for energy localization.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Extension not in the paper: the same isospectral reduction should apply to any periodic resonator lattice, with the leading-order frequencies given by eigenvalues of the adjacency or Laplacian matrix of the nearest-neighbor graph; this would include honeycomb and other Bravais lattices beyond the three treated here.
  • Extension not in the paper: the criterion $l(i-1)=N t$ for suppressed gradient blow-up could be inverted into a design rule for steering acoustic energy through chosen gaps, but the paper does not optimize over arrangements.
  • Testable extension: the formulas depend on separation only through $|\log \varepsilon|$, so changing a single gap in a chain should shift the resonant frequencies in a computable way; Remark 1.2 works out the $N=3$ case with two different gaps, and the same perturbative scheme should extend to arbitrary $N$.
  • Extension not in the paper: the capacitance-matrix reduction is not specific to acoustics, so analogous explicit frequency formulas should hold for high-contrast elastic or electromagnetic arrays; the paper mentions elastic waves as future work.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper studies subwavelength resonances of N > 2 closely spaced identical spherical resonators in three spatial configurations: chain, ring, and rectangular matrix. The authors reduce the Helmholtz resonance problem to a generalized capacitance matrix eigenvalue problem, and then analyze the capacitance matrix using leading-order asymptotics for close-to-touching spheres. The main results are explicit leading-order frequency formulas: for chains the frequencies are governed by eigenvalues 2(1 − cos((i−1)π/N)) of a Toeplitz-type matrix; for rings by the eigenvalues of a circulant matrix, giving double eigenvalues and hence fewer distinct frequencies; for matrices by roots of a product of shifted chain eigenvalue polynomials. The paper also gives boundary values of resonant modes and identifies resonators between which the gradient blow-up rate is reduced. The central claim is that the spectral response of a finite array is determined at leading order by the arrangement through these explicit structured matrices.

Significance. If correct, the paper provides useful explicit design formulas for finite subwavelength resonator arrays and extends the existing N = 2 close-to-touching analyses to N > 2. The reduction to Toeplitz, circulant, and block-Toeplitz eigenvalue problems is elegant, and the closed-form determinant computations (e.g., f_N(a) = −a sin(Nθ)/sin θ for the chain) are valuable. The paper also gives a concrete prediction of arrangement-dependent spectral degeneracies and mode-dependent gradient blow-up rates, which is of interest for metamaterial design. However, the main theorems contain a systematic dimensional/scaling error, and the matrix arrangement section omits proofs of essential lemmas, so the validity of the stated formulas is not yet established.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3.1, Proposition 3.1 and Eq. (3.1); Theorems 1.1, 1.6, 1.8] The capacitance asymptotics omit the sphere radius R. Since C_ij = ∫_{∂D_i} ∂v_j/∂ν dσ has the dimension of length, the singular part of the self-capacitance of a sphere of radius R near a touching neighbor must be πR|log ε| + O(1), not π|log ε| + O(1); similarly the nearest-neighbor off-diagonal entries must be −πR|log ε| + O(1). With the stated entries, λ̃_i = (3δ v_b^2/(4πR^3)) a_i^N π|log ε| has dimension length^{-1}·time^{-2}, and under a uniform dilation of all lengths by a factor s the claimed ω_i for i ≥ 2 scale as s^{-3/2} instead of the required s^{-1}; by contrast ω_1 scales correctly because M scales with R. Thus the explicit constants in Theorems 1.1, 1.6, and 1.8, as well as the examples in Section 6, are incorrect for general R; the |log ε| terms should carry R^{-2}, not R^{-3}. This is a load-bearing correction, not a notational issue. If the authors intend to normalize R = 1, this must be stated explicitly and the scaling restored afterward.
  2. [§5, Lemmas 5.3 and 5.4] The proofs of Lemmas 5.3 and 5.4 are omitted with the statement that they are similar to Lemmas 4.6 and 4.7, yet these lemmas are essential for Theorem 1.8. The analogy is not sufficient for Lemma 5.4: the model polynomial (1.9) can have repeated roots of multiplicity r_t > 2 (for example, for m = n = 6 the sum a_γ^m + a_α^n takes the same value from several distinct pairs), whereas the ring proof in Lemma 4.6 is explicitly built on the two-dimensional kernel of Â_t and a decomposition into two basis vectors. A complete proof of the root localization near repeated roots of arbitrary multiplicity is needed, including a treatment of the relevant eigenspaces and the scaling of the perturbations. As written, Theorem 1.8 is not proved.
  3. [§1.2.3 and §6.2.3] The abstract and introduction claim that the paper characterizes the asymptotic behavior of resonant modes for all three arrangements, but for the matrix arrangement no theorem analogous to Theorems 1.4 and 1.7 is stated or proved. The only matrix mode information appears in the N = 6 example in Section 6.2.3, which is not a general result. The authors should either state and prove a matrix mode theorem or explicitly restrict the claimed contribution to the chain and ring cases.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§1.2.3, after Table 1] The sentence "These results are summarized in Tables 1 and 2 blow" contains a typo: "blow" should be "below".
  2. [Equation (1.6) and Remark 1.5] The notation for the neck regions is inconsistent: equation (1.6) uses Ω^r_{l,l+1} while Remark 1.5 uses Ω_r^{l,l+1}. Please unify the notation.
  3. [Equation (1.4)] In the definition of M, the integration domain appears to be written as B_{\tilde R} (a ball) rather than ∂B_{\tilde R} (its boundary). Since the flux of ∂v_i/∂ν is integrated over a surface, the boundary of the large ball is presumably intended.
  4. [§6 and §4.1] The symbol γ is used both as a perturbation constant in Lemma 4.6 and as the exponent γ = min{β/2, 1−β} in Section 6. These uses should be distinguished to avoid confusion.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the resonant-frequency formulas are obtained from a cited capacitance-matrix reduction plus a new Toeplitz/circulant eigenvalue analysis, not from the conclusions themselves.

full rationale

The derivation chain is: (1) Lemma 2.6 (cited from [9]) reduces the Helmholtz resonance problem to an eigenvalue problem for the generalized capacitance matrix; this is an independent two-body-layer-potential result. (2) Propositions 3.1, 4.1, and 5.1 supply the small-ε entry asymptotics of the capacitance matrix. These are imported from [24], [39], and [43]. The paper states this explicitly, e.g. 'by virtue of [43, Proposition 1.5], we have C_{11} = ... = π|log ε| + M_{11} + o(1)' and 'Referring to [39], we have C_{i,i+1} = ... = -π|log ε| + M_{i,i+1} + o(1)'. There is some self-citation here, since H. Li is a coauthor of [43], but the cited proposition is a derived asymptotic result about two close-to-touching convex resonators; it does not assume the N-resonator frequency distribution that Theorem 1.1 aims to prove, and the same asymptotics are also supported by [39] and [24]. (3) The genuinely new content is the spectral analysis of the resulting model matrices: the determinant expansions, factorization of f_N(a), root localization via the intermediate value theorem, and eigenvector recursions in Lemmas 3.2-3.5, 4.2-4.6, and 5.2-5.4. These computations do not reintroduce Theorem 1.1 as an input. No constants are fitted to force the stated frequencies; the quantity M is the average capacity defined in (1.4) and appears as the smallest eigenvalue asymptotics, not as a tunable parameter. The leading-order formula for ω_1 is a consequence of the capacitance-matrix eigenvalue problem, not a restatement of its definition. The possible dimensional concern about the missing radius R in Proposition 3.1 is a correctness or scaling risk, not a circularity, and it does not change the fact that the paper's derivation is not self-referential. Overall, the paper is a straightforward application of known capacitance asymptotics followed by nontrivial model-matrix spectral analysis, so no circular step is exhibited.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central results rest on the capacitance approximation and on entry-wise asymptotics for the capacitance matrix imported from earlier papers. No new physical entities are introduced. The main unresolved input is the average capacity M and the unspecified scaling constants Lambda and beta.

free parameters (3)
  • Spacing scale exponent beta = Unspecified value in (0,1).
    Introduced in (1.2) to set epsilon = exp(-Lambda/delta^(1-beta)); the frequency scale eta ~ delta^(beta/2) depends on it.
  • Spacing constant Lambda = Unspecified positive constant.
    Fixed positive constant in (1.2); appears in eta and in the N=2 comparison in Remark 1.3.
  • Average capacity M = Not computed, defined by (1.4).
    Determines the lowest resonant frequency omega_1 in all three theorems; the paper does not evaluate it, so the omega_1 formula is a restatement of the capacitance eigenvalue, not an independent prediction.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The subwavelength resonant frequencies are the square roots of the eigenvalues of the generalized capacitance matrix, up to O(delta) (Lemma 2.6, cited from [6]).
    All theorems build on this reduction; it is imported, not proved here.
  • domain assumption The leading-order asymptotic entries of the capacitance matrix for close-to-touching spheres have the form given in Propositions 3.1, 4.1 and 5.1, with nearest-neighbor terms proportional to |log epsilon| and all other entries O(1).
    These entry-wise asymptotics, cited from [39,43,24], are what justify the Toeplitz, circulant, and block-Toeplitz matrix models.
  • domain assumption The inter-resonator spacing is epsilon = exp(-Lambda/delta^(1-beta)) with 0<beta<1.
    This super-algebraic small-spacing regime is required for the leading-order eigenvalue localization and is not justified from the underlying physics.
  • ad hoc to paper For the matrix arrangement, Lemmas 5.3 and 5.4, which localize the roots of det(C - a rho I) near the roots of the model polynomial, hold by analogy with the ring case.
    The paper states these lemmas are proved like the ring lemmas and omits the proofs; Theorem 1.8 depends on them.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Resonant frequencies distribution for multiple closely spaced subwavelength resonators." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/RWZCE6YF

@misc{pith2026250608522,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Resonant frequencies distribution for multiple closely spaced subwavelength resonators},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/RWZCE6YF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.08522}
}
abstract

In this paper, we investigate a resonant system comprising $N$ closely packed spherical resonators ($N>2$). We analyze how the spatial arrangement of these resonators influences the distribution of resonant frequencies, focusing on leading-order terms. Furthermore, we characterize the asymptotic behavior of resonant modes linked to their respective frequencies. Our results demonstrate distinct trends across configurations: For single-row alignment, the system exhibits $N$ clearly separated resonant frequencies; For multi-row arrangements, the resonant frequency range broadens, though the total number of frequencies may diminish; while for ring configurations, comparable frequency ranges to chain arrangements emerge, but with fewer resonant frequencies. We derive explicit analytical expressions to quantify these frequency distributions. Regarding resonant modes, we identify that at specific frequencies, the gradient of these modes may exhibit different asymptotic behavior between different resonators.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.08522 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. A chain arrangement. distribution of resonant frequencies [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Two ring arrangements. Set α(N) := ( (N + 1)/2, N is odd, N/2, N is even. (1.7) For the ring arrangement, we have the distribution of resonant frequencies in the following. Theorem 1.6. Let D be a ring arrangement illustrated as above. Then, as δ → 0, the resonant frequencies of D are given by ω1 = q3v 2 bMδ 4πR3  1 + o(1) , and ω2i−2, ω2i−1 = s 3v 2 b aˆ i N 4R3 δ| log ε| + O  s δ | log ε| + δ  , i = 2, . . . ,… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Matrix arrangements. When the resonators are arranged in a matrix format, the distribution of their resonant frequencies becomes more intricate. Let a γ m and a α n be defined in (1.5), and denote ¯a 1 N ≤ · · · ≤ a¯ N N as all the roots of the polynomial in a given by Ym γ=1 Yn α=1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Resonant modes of a chain arrangement for N = 4. In this figure and subsequent ones, the orange regions between the spheres indicate that the upper–bounded norm of the gradient of the resonant mode is C ε| log ε| in those areas. Conversely, the red regions denote that …
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: 6.1.3. Matrix arrangement. When N = 4, the matrix arrangement is the same as the ring arrangement, with only the order of the resonator numbers being different. 6.2. For N = 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_5.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Resonant modes of ring arrangement for N = 4. 6.2.1. Chain arrangement. By Theorem 1.1, we deduce that a 2 6 = 2 − √ 3, a 3 6 = 1, a 4 6 = 2, a 5 6 = 3, a 6 6 = 2 + √ 3, which leads to the resonant frequencies ω1 = s 3v 2 bM 4πR3 δ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p0…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Resonant modes of chain arrangement for N = 6. u 6 1 = 1, u6 2 = −1, u6 3 = 1, u6 4 = −1, u6 5 = 1, u6 6 = −1, where k s t are some constants for t = 1, 2 and s = 2, . . . , 5. See [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Resonant modes of ring arrangement for N = 6. 6.2.3. Matrix arrangement. For N = 6, with m = 2 and n = 3. By Theorem 1.8, we obtain a¯ 2 6 = 1, a¯ 3 6 = 2, a¯ 4 6 = ¯a 5 6 = 3, a¯ 6 6 = 5. Therefore, the resonant frequencies are ω1 = q3v 2 bM 4πR3 δ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:f…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Resonant modes of matrix arrangement for N = 6. 7. Concluding remarks In this paper, we investigate how the number and spatial arrangement of resonators in a subwavelength acoustic resonance system influence its resonant frequencies. This is achieved by analyzing the e…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 51 canonical work pages

  1. [31]

    Feppon, and H

    F. Feppon, and H. Ammari, Modal decompositions and point scatterer approximations near the Minnaert resonance frequencies, Stud. Appl. Math., 149 (2022), pp. 164–229

    work page 2022

  2. [1]

    Ammari, S

    H. Ammari, S. Barandun, J. Cao, and F. Feppon, Edge modes in subwavelength resonators in one dimen- sion, Multiscale Model. Simul., 21 (2023), pp. 964–992

    work page 2023

  3. [2]

    Ammari, G

    H. Ammari, G. Ciraolo, H. Kang, H. Lee, and K. Yun, Spectral analysis of the Neumann–Poincar´ e operator and characterization of the stress concentration in anti-plane elasticity, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 208 (2013), pp. 275–304

    work page 2013

  4. [3]

    Ammari, A

    H. Ammari, A. Dabrowski, B. Fitzpatrick, P. Millien, and M. Sini, Subwavelength resonant dielectric nanoparticles with high refractive indices, Math. Methods Appl. Sci., 42:18 (2019), pp. 6567–6579

    work page 2019

  5. [4]

    Ammari and B

    H. Ammari and B. Davies, A fully–coupled subwavelength resonance approach to filtering auditory signals, Proc. A, 475 (2019), 20190049

    work page 2019

  6. [5]

    Ammari and B

    H. Ammari and B. Davies, Mimicking the active cochlea with a fluid-coupled array of subwavelength Hopf resonators, Proc. A, 476 (2020), 20190870

    work page 2020

  7. [6]

    Ammari, B

    H. Ammari, B. Davies and E. O. Hiltunen, Functional analytic methods for discrete approximations of subwavelength resonator systems, Pure Appl. Anal., 6 (2024), pp. 873–939

    work page 2024

  8. [7]

    High-order exceptional points and enhanced sensing in subwavelength resonator arrays

    H. Ammari, B. Davies, E. O. Hiltunen, H. Lee, and S. Yu, “High-order exceptional points and enhanced sensing in subwavelength resonator arrays”, Stud. Appl. Math. 146:2 (2021), 440-462

    work page 2021

Show all 51 references
  1. [8]

    Ammari, B

    H. Ammari, B. Davies, E. O. Hiltunen, and S. Yu, Topologically protected edge modes in one-dimensional chains of subwavelength resonators, J. Math. Pures Appl., 144 (2020), pp. 17–49

    2020

  2. [9]

    Ammari, B

    H. Ammari, B. Davies, and S. Yu, Close–to–touching acoustic subwavelength resonators: Eigenfrequency separation and gradient blow–up, Multiscale Model. Simul., 18 (2020), pp. 1299–1317

    2020

  3. [10]

    Ammari, B

    H. Ammari, B. Fitzpatrick, D. Gontier, H. Lee, and H. Zhang, Sub–wavelength focusing of acoustic waves in bubbly media, Proc. A, 473 (2017), 20170469

    2017

  4. [11]

    Ammari, B

    H. Ammari, B. Fitzpatrick, D. Gontier, H. Lee, and H. Zhang, Minnaert resonances for acoustic waves in bubbly media, Ann. Inst. H. Poincar´ e Anal. Non Lin´ eaire, 35 (2018), pp. 1975–1998

    2018

  5. [12]

    Ammari, B

    H. Ammari, B. Fitzpatrick, H. Lee, S. Yu, and H. Zhang, Double–negative acoustic metamaterials, Quart. Appl. Math., 77 (2019), pp. 767–791

    2019

  6. [13]

    Ammari, E

    H. Ammari, E. O. Hiltunen and S. Yu, A high-frequency homogenization approach near the Dirac points in bubbly honeycomb crystals, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 238 (2020), pp. 1559–1583

    2020

  7. [14]

    Ammari, H

    H. Ammari, H. Kang, D. Kim, S. Yu, Quantitative estimates for stress concentration of the Stokes flow between adjacent circular cylinders. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 55 (2023), no. 4, pp. 3755–3806

    2023

  8. [15]

    Ammari, H

    H. Ammari, H. Kang, H. Lee, J. Lee, and M. Lim, Optimal estimates for the electric field in two dimensions, J. Math. Pures Appl., 88 (2007), pp. 307–324. 30 H.G. LI AND J.H. ZHANG

    2007

  9. [16]

    Ammari, B

    H. Ammari, B. Li, and J. Zou, Mathematical analysis of electromagnetic scattering by dielectric nanopar- ticles with high refractive indices, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 376:1 (2023), pp. 39–90

    2023

  10. [17]

    Ammari, P

    H. Ammari, P. Millien, M. Ruiz, and H. Zhang, Mathematical analysis of plasmonic nanoparticles: the scalar case, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 224:2 (2017), pp. 597–658

    2017

  11. [18]

    Ammari, M

    H. Ammari, M. Ruiz, S. Yu, and H. Zhang, Mathematical analysis of plasmonic resonances for nanoparti- cles: the full Maxwell equations, J. Differential Equations, 261:6 (2016), pp. 3615–3669

    2016

  12. [19]

    Ammari and H

    H. Ammari and H. Zhang, A mathematical theory of super–resolution by using a system of sub-wavelength Helmholtz resonators, Comm. Math. Phys., 337:1 (2015), pp. 379–428

    2015

  13. [20]

    V. F. K. Bjerknes, Fields of Force, The Columbia University Press, New York, 1906

    1906

  14. [21]

    J. Bao, H. Li, and Y. Li, Gradient estimates for solutions of the Lam´ e system with partially infinite coefficients, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 215 (2015), pp. 307–351

    2015

  15. [22]

    J. Bao, H. Li, and Y. Li, Gradient estimates for solutions of the Lam´ e system with partially infinite coefficients in dimensions greater than two, Adv. Math., 305 (2017), pp. 298–338

    2017

  16. [23]

    E. Bao, Y. Li, and B. Yin, Gradient estimates for the perfect conductivity problem, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 193 (2009), pp. 195–226

    2009

  17. [24]

    E. Bao, Y. Li and B. Yin, Gradient estimates for the perfect and insulated conductivity problems with multiple inclusions, Comm. Partial Differential Equations, 35 (2010), pp. 1982–2006

    2010

  18. [25]

    Bonnetier and F

    E. Bonnetier and F. Triki, On the spectrum of the Poincar´ e variational problem for two close-to-touching inclusions in 2D, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 209 (2013), pp. 541–567

    2013

  19. [26]

    D. L. Colton and R. Kress, Integral equation methods in scattering theory, Pure and Applied Mathematics (New York) A Wiley-Interscience Publication, Wiley, New York, 1983

    1983

  20. [27]

    L. A. Crum, Bjerknes forces on bubbles in a stationary sound field, J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., 57 (1975), pp. 1363–1370

    1975

  21. [28]

    Devaud, T

    M. Devaud, T. Hocquet, J. C. Bacri, and V. Leroy, The Minnaert bubble: An acoustic approach, Eur. J. Phys., 29 (2008), 1263

    2008

  22. [29]

    H. Dong, H. Li and L. Xu, On higher regularity of Stokes systems with piecewise H¨ older continuous coefficients, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 377 (2024), pp. 8477–8513

    2024

  23. [30]

    H. Dong, Y. Li, Z. Yang, Gradient estimates for the insulated conductivity problem: the non-umbilical case. J. Math. Pures Appl. (9) 189 (2024), Paper No. 103587, 37 pp

    2024

  24. [32]

    Feppon, Z

    F. Feppon, Z. Cheng and H. Ammari, Subwavelength resonances in one-dimensional high-contrast acoustic media, SIAM J. Appl. Math., 83 (2023), pp. 625–665

    2023

  25. [33]

    H. Kang, S. Yu, Quantitative characterization of stress concentration in the presence of closely spaced hard inclusions in two-dimensional linear elasticity. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 232 (2019), no. 1, 121–196

    2019

  26. [34]

    H. K. Khattak, P. Bianucci, and A. D. Slepkov, Linking plasma formation in grapes to microwave reso- nances of aqueous dimers, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 116 (2019), pp. 4000–4005

    2019

  27. [35]

    Kim and M

    J. Kim and M. Lim, Electric field concentration in the presence of an inclusion with eccentric core-shell geometry, Math. Ann., 373 (2019), pp. 517–551

    2019

  28. [36]

    Kushwaha, B

    M. Kushwaha, B. Djafari-Rouhani, and L. Dobrzynski, Sound isolation from cubic arrays of air bubbles in water, Phys. Lett. A, 248 (1998), pp. 252–256

    1998

  29. [37]

    Leroy, A

    V. Leroy, A. Bretagne, M. Fink, H. Willaime, P. Tabeling, and A. Tourin, Design and characterization of bubble phononic crystals, Appl. Phys. Lett., 95 (2009), 171904

    2009

  30. [38]

    Li, Lower bounds of gradient’s blow-up for the Lam´ e system with partially infinite coefficients, J

    H. Li, Lower bounds of gradient’s blow-up for the Lam´ e system with partially infinite coefficients, J. Math. Pures Appl. (9) 149 (2021), 98–134

    2021

  31. [39]

    H. Li, Y. Li and Z. Yang, Asymptotics of the gradient of solutions to the perfect conductivity problem, Multiscale Model. Simul., 17 (2019), pp. 899–925

    2019

  32. [40]

    Li and L

    H. Li and L. Xu, Estimates for stress concentration between two adjacent rigid inclusions in Stokes flow, J. Funct. Anal., 286 (2024), 110313

    2024

  33. [41]

    H. Li, L. Xu and P. Zhang, Stress blowup analysis when a suspending rigid particle approaches the boundary in Stokes flow: 2-dimensional case, SIAM J. Math. Anal., 55 (2023), pp. 4493–4536

    2023

  34. [42]

    H. Li, L. Xu and P. Zhang, Stress blow-up analysis when suspending rigid particles approach boundary in 3D Stokes flow, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst., 44 (2024), pp. 1134–1165

    2024

  35. [43]

    Li, and Y

    H. Li, and Y. Zhao, The interaction between two close–to–touching convex acoustic subwavelength res- onators, Multiscale Model. Simul., 21 (2023), pp. 804–826. FINITE SYSTEMS OF SUBW A VELENGTH RESONATORS 31

    2023

  36. [44]

    Y. Li, Z. Yang, Gradient estimates of solutions to the insulated conductivity problem in dimension greater than two. Math. Ann. 385 (2023), no. 3-4, 1775–1796

    2023

  37. [45]

    Lim and K

    M. Lim and K. Yun, Blow-up of electric fields between closely spaced spherical perfect conductors, Comm. Partial Differential Equations, 34 (2009), pp. 1287–1315

    2009

  38. [46]

    Meklachi, S

    T. Meklachi, S. Moskow, and J. C. Schotland, Asymptotic analysis of resonances of small volume high contrast linear and nonlinear scatterers, J. Math. Phys., 59:8 (2018), 083502

    2018

  39. [47]

    Minnaert, On musical air–bubbles and the sounds of running water, Philos

    M. Minnaert, On musical air–bubbles and the sounds of running water, Philos. Mag., 16 (1933), pp. 235–248

    1933

  40. [48]

    Pandey, Asymmetricity and sign reversal of secondary Bjerknes force from strong nonlinear coupling in cavitation bubble pairs, Phys

    V. Pandey, Asymmetricity and sign reversal of secondary Bjerknes force from strong nonlinear coupling in cavitation bubble pairs, Phys. Rev. E, 99 (2019), 042209

    2019

  41. [49]

    Poladian, Asymptotic behaviour of the effective dielectric constants of composite materials, Proc

    L. Poladian, Asymptotic behaviour of the effective dielectric constants of composite materials, Proc. A, 426 (1989), pp. 343–359

    1989

  42. [50]

    Weinkove, The insulated conductivity problem, effective gradient estimates and the maximum principle, Math

    B. Weinkove, The insulated conductivity problem, effective gradient estimates and the maximum principle, Math. Ann. 385 (1–2) (2023) 1–16

    2023

  43. [51]

    Yu and H

    S. Yu and H. Ammari, Plasmonic interaction between nanospheres, SIAM Rev., 60 (2018), pp. 356–385. (H.G. Li)School of Mathematical Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Laboratory of Math- ematics and Complex Systems, Ministry of Education, Beijing 100875, China. Email address:...

    2018

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.