Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 60 references

Breaking Kirchhoff's Law in Nonlinear Thermal Emission

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper reports a magnet-free experimental violation of Kirchhoff's law of thermal emission, achieved by pumping GaAs nanocrystals with 10.6 µm light to upconvert thermal radiation via sum-frequency generation.

desk verdict Real pump-induced spectral changes in a nonlinear RQPM medium, but the Kirchhoff-law-violation claim is not supported without direct temperature control and error bars. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.08544 v1 pith:QM2NQOXU submitted 2025-06-10 physics.optics physics.app-ph

R. Ma , Y. Yu , Y. Sun , H. Yan , W. Wan This is my paper
classification physics.opticsphysics.app-ph PACS 44.40.+a42.65.Ky
keywords Kirchhoff'slawthermalemissionnonreciprocalradiationsum-frequencygenerationrandomquasi-phase-matchingGaAsnanocrystalsradiativecoolingnonlinearoptics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports a magnet-free experimental violation of Kirchhoff's law of thermal radiation, using a GaAs nanocrystalline scattering medium with strong quadratic nonlinearity. The claim is that an intense 10.6 µm pump upconverts a portion of the material's own thermal radiation near 5 µm to about 3.4 µm through sum-frequency generation, raising emissivity at that band, while the same nonlinearity gives transmitted mid-infrared light a gain channel that lowers apparent absorptivity. If correct, the work supplies the first experimental nonlinear route to nonreciprocal thermal emission that does not require magnetic fields, and it suggests active, pump-tunable control of radiative heat flow for cooling, energy harvesting, and camouflage.

What carries the argument

The mechanism is pump-driven sum-frequency generation (SFG) in a random assembly of GaAs nanocrystals: thermal photons near 5 µm are mixed with a 10.6 µm pump to produce upconverted emission around 3.4 µm, which directly enhances emissivity, and the same nonlinear coupling amplifies a weak probe, reducing absorptivity. The essential enabling object is random quasi-phase-matching (RQPM), the statistical phase-matching that occurs in a polycrystalline nonlinear medium when many randomly oriented grains collectively provide the momentum needed for broadband conversion; the paper calculates an optimal average grain size of about 84.8 µm for this effect.

What would settle it

Measure the local temperature of the pumped GaAs nanocrystals in situ (for example with a calibrated mid-infrared emissivity thermometer or temperature-dependent Raman thermometry) while repeating the pumped emissivity/absorptivity traces; if the inferred temperature rise is large enough to account for the 3.3 µm emission enhancement and the probe transmission increase, the divergence is thermal rather than nonlinear. An independent control using a centrosymmetric (non-SFG) scattering medium with matched linear absorption would separate the pump-induced temperature effect from the nonlinear gain.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is the divergence of emissivity and absorptivity at a common wavelength, 3.3 µm, in a heated nonlinear scattering medium under optical pumping. At 705 K with the pump off, the emissivity and absorptivity agree as Kirchhoff's law demands; with the 10.6 µm pump on, the measured emissivity grows nearly linearly with pump power while the probe transmission rises, meaning the apparent absorptivity falls. The paper interprets this as nonlinearity-induced breaking of time-reciprocity: sum-frequency generation adds a new emission channel while providing nonlinear gain to a propagating probe. The effect is broadband because random quasi-phase-matching in randomly oriented GaAs nanocrystals allows the upconversion to proceed over a wide range of wavelengths, and the same mechanism is used to show faster thermal equilibration of a coated sensor, interpreted as an active radiative cooling channel.

Load-bearing premise

The measured emissivity and absorptivity at 3.3 µm under the pump are treated as equilibrium-like properties of a single isothermal sample; if the pump instead heats the nanocrystals locally, the enhanced short-wavelength Planck emission and faster probe thermalization would mimic a Kirchhoff violation.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Emissivity and absorptivity at a given wavelength can be separated and tuned by pump intensity and pump wavelength, giving active, magnet-free control of thermal radiation.
  • The random quasi-phase-matching mechanism makes the nonreciprocal response broadband rather than narrowband, unlike typical resonant magneto-optical emitters.
  • The pump-enhanced emissivity provides a possible active radiative cooling channel, supported by the measured reduction in thermal equilibration time of a coated sensor.
  • The same upconversion scheme should work for any thermal emitter material that is transparent in the relevant band and possesses a second-order nonlinearity, extending the approach to other wavelength ranges.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct consequence the authors leave implicit is that the same medium should act as a pump-controlled mid-infrared amplifier near the upconversion band, since the nonlinear gain mechanism that lowers absorptivity could be used to amplify external signals, not only to change apparent absorption.
  • The 84.8 µm optimal grain size is a falsifiable design rule: if random quasi-phase-matching is really the mechanism, varying the average GaAs particle size around that value should shift or suppress the 3.4 µm upconversion peak, a test not reported in this paper.
  • The transient heat-dissipation data imply a radiative thermal conductance that is pump-tunable; deriving its magnitude from the measured emissivity shift would connect this experiment to quantitative radiative-cooling performance metrics, which the paper does not do.
  • Because RQPM is geometry-tolerant, the same scheme should transfer to other noncentrosymmetric powders, such as ZnSe or orientation-patterned GaP, provided they are transparent near the thermal and pump wavelengths; this generalization is an inference, not a claim of the paper.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports experiments on a GaAs micro/nanocrystalline medium heated to about 700 K and pumped by a 10.6 μm continuous-wave laser. It claims that sum-frequency generation upconverts 5 μm thermal radiation to about 3.3 μm, thereby increasing emissivity, while optical parametric gain experienced by a 3.3 μm probe reduces absorptivity, so that emissivity and absorptivity diverge at the same wavelength, which the authors call a violation of Kirchhoff's law. The paper also reports faster thermal equilibration of a GaAs-coated thermistor under pumping, attributed to enhanced radiative dissipation. The key evidence consists of pump-power-dependent emission and probe-transmission measurements at 3.3 μm and spectra with pump on and off.

Significance. The experiment is in a well-established area of nonlinear thermal emission and uses an independent prediction of the upconverted wavelength (1/λ_sfg = 1/10.6 + 1/5) with no free parameter fitted to enforce the observed spectral feature; the data are openly available. If the interpretation as a pump-controlled, nonlinear nonreciprocity is accepted, the work would be the first magnet-free experimental demonstration of such control over thermal emissivity and absorptivity, with potential value for thermal management. However, the paper's stronger claim of violating the equilibrium Kirchhoff law is not supported by the present evidence because the system is externally pumped and the sample temperature under the pump is not measured.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 'To show the violation of Kirchhoff's law', Fig. 3, Eqs. (1)-(2)] The quantities Δε and Δα are defined as pump-induced corrections to emission and to probe transmission. Kirchhoff's law is an equilibrium statement; the 10.6 μm pump is a coherent external drive that removes the medium from thermal equilibrium, so the observed divergence is a pumped nonlinear response (SFG upconversion and optical parametric amplification), not a violation of the equilibrium law. Please either derive the applicable nonequilibrium generalized Kirchhoff relation from fluctuation theory or reframe the central claim as a demonstration of pump-controlled nonlinear nonreciprocity in thermal emission.
  2. [Figs. 2(b)-2(d) and 3; 'To suppress substrate heating'] The claim that the pump only changes emissivity and absorptivity, not temperature, rests on the statement that substrate heating was suppressed and on simulations in Supplementary S3; no direct in-situ temperature measurement of the GaAs layer under the pump is reported. Even a small temperature rise would increase 3.3 μm Planck emission and accelerate thermal equilibration, which would mimic the claimed nonlinear signatures. Please provide in-situ thermometry (for example, from the unpumped spectral shape or a reference spectral line) and a control sample without χ^(2) response to bound the temperature rise.
  3. [Fig. 3(b), 'Measured emissivity and absorptivity'] The emissivity and absorptivity data are presented without error bars, repeated trials, or a description of the normalization used to convert the measured spontaneous signal and probe transmission into absolute dimensionless ε and α. Without this calibration and uncertainty information, the claimed linear divergence cannot be assessed quantitatively, and scattering losses in the nanocrystalline medium need to be separated from absorption before the absorptivity result can be interpreted as a material property.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Experimental parameters, Fig. 2] The text says the sample is heated to approximately 300 °C, but Fig. 2 reports spectra at 705 K (432 °C); please correct this inconsistency or clarify why different temperatures are quoted.
  2. [Methods, RQPM condition] The term 'nanocrystals' conflicts with the stated optimal particle size of about 84.8 μm; please use 'microcrystalline' or clarify the size distribution of the particles.
  3. [Reference [54]] Reference [54] is cited for a theoretical proposal of nonlinear frequency conversion with thermal emission, but it reports random quasi-phase matching in polycrystalline materials, not thermal emission; please correct the citation.
  4. [Eq. (2)] The correction factor η and the weak-probe limit are introduced without derivation; a sentence indicating the physical origin (for example, depletion or cascade effects) would help the reader assess the relation Δε = -Δα.
  5. [Supplementary S3] The simulation results in S3 are referenced but not included in the provided manuscript; please include the simulation details or a summary in the main text so the temperature-rising argument can be checked.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the measured emissivity–absorptivity divergence is a direct experimental result, not a fitted or self-referential construct.

full rationale

The paper's central claim rests on two independent measurements: spontaneous emission near 3.3 μm with the probe off (emissivity) and transmitted intensity of a 3.3 μm probe under varying pump power (absorptivity). These are not fitted to each other, and no free parameter is adjusted to force their divergence. Equations (1) and (2) are presented as mechanistic hypotheses for why emissivity should increase and absorptivity should decrease under pumping; they are not used as fitting functions, and the correction factor η is a stated weak-probe assumption, not a fitted value. The predicted upconversion wavelength is fixed independently by the pump wavelength (10.6 μm) and the thermal peak (~5 μm), giving ~3.4 μm, which is then observed near 3.3 μm; this is an external consistency check, not an input recycled as a prediction. The only self-citations are to the authors' prior work on nonlinear thermal emission ([55,56]), used for fabrication details, random quasi-phase-matching context, and consistency with earlier SFG scaling; these are not load-bearing for the Kirchhoff-violation claim, and the RQPM concept is also cited to the independent prior work [54]. No uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors' own publications, and no known result is merely renamed. The absence of a direct in-situ temperature measurement during pump-on spectra is a legitimate experimental limitation that bears on whether the system is isothermal and thus on whether the measured quantities are the equilibrium ε and α of Kirchhoff's law, but it is a physical-interpretation concern, not a circularity in the derivation chain. The paper's measured divergence therefore does not reduce, by its own equations or by citation, to its own inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard nonlinear optics plus assumptions about the material retaining chi-2 after grinding, random quasi-phase-matching efficiency, and the validity of emissivity and absorptivity definitions under an external pump. No free parameters are fitted in the main text, and no new particles or forces are introduced.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Random quasi-phase-matching permits broadband sum-frequency generation in randomly oriented polycrystalline media.
    Invoked to explain broadband conversion near 3.4 µm; taken from ref 54 and the authors' prior works (refs 55 and 56), not re-derived in this paper.
  • domain assumption GaAs retains a nonzero effective second-order susceptibility after grinding into nanocrystals.
    Necessary for Eq. (1) and Eq. (2); the averaged chi-2 is said to be derived in Supplementary S1.
  • ad hoc to paper The weak probe approximation makes the correction factor eta close to unity, so delta-epsilon equals minus delta-alpha.
    The paper introduces eta between 0 and 1 to account for probe influence on SFG, then assumes eta is near unity; this assumption makes the symmetry of the central claim exact.
  • domain assumption Emissivity and absorptivity remain well-defined thermodynamic properties while a strong external pump drives the system out of equilibrium.
    The measurement protocol in Fig. 3 labels spontaneous emission as emissivity and probe transmission as absorptivity; this presumes a nonequilibrium extension of Kirchhoff's concepts.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Breaking Kirchhoff's Law in Nonlinear Thermal Emission." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QM2NQOXU

@misc{pith2026250608544,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Breaking Kirchhoff's Law in Nonlinear Thermal Emission},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QM2NQOXU}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.08544}
}
read the original abstract

Thermal radiation is strictly governed by Kirchhoff s law to reach thermal equilibrium. The violation of Kirchhoff s law decouples nonreciprocally the equity between absorptivity and emissivity, enabling exotic thermal engineering applications. However, achieving broadband nonreciprocal thermal emissivity and absorptivity remains a challenge. Here we experimentally demonstrate nonreciprocal and broadband thermal radiation by breaking Kirchhoff s law through nonlinear optical frequency conversion in a scattering medium. Thermal blackbody radiation is upconverted through sum-frequency generation with an intense infrared pump, while broadband conversion is enabled by the critical random quasi-phase-matching condition in the nonlinear nanocrystals. Moreover, a temporal transient measurement also indicates a possible active radiation cooling through such nonlinear thermal radiation. These results may pave a new way for nonlinear and active thermal management in critical applications like radiation cooling, energy harvesting, and infrared camouflage.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 58 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    J. J. Greffet, R. Carminati, K. Joulain, J. P. Mulet, S. Mainguy, and Y. Chen, Coherent emission of light by thermal sources, Nature 416, 61– 64 (2002)

    work page 2002

  2. [2]

    X. Liu, T. Tyler, T. Starr, A. F. Starr, N. M. Jokerst, and W. J. Padilla, Taming the blackbody with infrared metamaterials as selective thermal emitters, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 045901 (2011)

    work page 2011

  3. [3]

    Liu, and W

    X. Liu, and W. J. Padilla, Dynamic manipulation of infrared radiation with MEMS metamaterials, Adv. Opt. Mater. 1, 559-562 (2013)

    work page 2013

  4. [4]

    C. Luo, A. Narayanaswamy, G. Chen, and J. D. Joannopoulos, Thermal radiation from photonic crystals: a direct calculation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 213905 (2004)

    work page 2004

  5. [5]

    Zoysa, Conversion of broadband to narrowband thermal emission through energy recycling, Nat

    D. Zoysa, Conversion of broadband to narrowband thermal emission through energy recycling, Nat. Photon. 6, 535-539 (2012)

    work page 2012

  6. [6]

    D. G. Baranov, Y . Xiao, I. A. Nechepurenko, A. Krasnok, A. Alù, and M. A. Kats, Nanophotonic engineering of far -field thermal emitters, Nat. Mater. 18, 920-930 (2019)

    work page 2019

  7. [7]

    Laroche, R

    M. Laroche, R. Carminati, and J. J. Greffet, Coherent thermal antenna using a photonic crystal slab, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 123903 (2006)

    work page 2006

  8. [8]

    G. Lu, C. R. Gubbin, J. R. Nolen, T. Folland, M. J. Tadjer, S. De. Liberato, and J. D. Caldwell, Engineering the spectral and spatial dispersion of thermal emission via polariton–phonon strong coupling, Nano Lett. 21, 1831-1838 (2021)

    work page 2021

Show all 60 references
  1. [9]

    J. D. Caldwell, O. J. Glembocki, Y. Francescato, N. Sharac, V. Giannini, F. J. Bezares, J. P. Long, J. C. Owrutsky, I. Vurgaftman, J. G. Tischler, V. D. Wheeler, N. D. Bassim, L . M. Shirey, R. Kasica, and S . A. Maier, Low-loss, extreme subdiffraction photon confinement via s...

    2013

  2. [10]

    S. A. Maier, M. L. Brongersma, P. G. Kik, S. Meltzer, A. A. G. Requicha, and H. A. Atwater, Plasmonics—a route to nanoscale optical devices, Adv. Mater. 13, 1501-1505 (2001)

    2001

  3. [11]

    B. J. Lee, C. J. Fu, and Z. M. Zhang, Coherent thermal emission from one-dimensional photonic crystals, Appl. Phys. Lett. 87, 071904 (2005)

    2005

  4. [12]

    O. Ilic, P. Bermel, G. Chen, J. D. Joannopoulos, I. Celanovic, and M. Soljačić, Tailoring high-temperature radiation and the resurrection of the incandescent source, Nat. Nanotechnol. 11, 320-324 (2016)

    2016

  5. [13]

    Laroche, C

    M. Laroche, C. Arnold, F. Marquier, R. Carminati, J. J. Greffet, S. Collin, N. Bardou, and J. L. Pelouard, Highly directional radiation generated by a tungsten thermal source, Opt. Lett. 30, 2623-2625 (2005)

    2005

  6. [14]

    Chalabi, A

    H. Chalabi, A. Alù, and M. L. Brongersma, Focused thermal emission from a nanostructured SiC surface, Phys. Rev. B 94, 094307 (2016)

    2016

  7. [15]

    V. W. Brar, M. C. Sherrott, M. S. Jang, S. Kim, L. Kim, M. Choi, L. A. Sweatlock, and H. A. Atwater, Electronic modulation of infrared radiation in graphene plasmonic resonators, Nat. Commun. 6, 7032 (2015)

    2015

  8. [16]

    M. A. Kats , R. Blanchard , S. Zhang , P. Genevet, C. Ko , S. Ramanathan , and F. Capasso, Vanadium Dioxide as a Natural Disordered Metamaterial: Perfect Thermal Emission and Large Broadband Negat-ive Differential Thermal Emittance, Phys. Rev. X 3, 041004 (2013)

    2013

  9. [17]

    T Inoue, M. D. Zoysa, T. Asano, and S. Noda, Realization of dynamic thermal emission control, Nat. Mater. 13, 928-931 (2014)

    2014

  10. [18]

    K. J. Shayegan, S. Biswas, B. Zhao, S. Fan, and H. A. Atwater, Direct observation of the viola tion of Kirchhoff’s law of thermal radiation, Nat. Photon. 17, 891-896 (2023)

    2023

  11. [19]

    Buddhiraju, W

    S. Buddhiraju, W. Li, and S. Fan, Photonic refrigeration from time-modulated thermal emission, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 077402 (2020)

    2020

  12. [20]

    Rephaeli, A

    E. Rephaeli, A. Raman, and S. Fan, Ultrabroadband photonic structures to achieve high -performance daytime radiative cooling, Nano Lett. 13, 1457-1461 (2013)

    2013

  13. [21]

    A. P. Raman, M. A. Anoma, L. Zhu, E. Rephaeli, and S. Fan, Passive radiative cooling below ambient air temperature under direct sunlight , Nature 515, 540–544 (2014)

    2014

  14. [22]

    P. C. Hsu, A. Y. Song, P. B. Catrysse, C. Liu, Y. Peng, J. Xie, S. Fan, and Y. Cui, Radiative human body cooling by nanoporous polyethylene textile, Science 353, 1019-1023 (2016)

    2016

  15. [23]

    M. A. Green, Time-asymmetric photovoltaics, Nano Lett. 12, 5985-5988 (2012)

    2012

  16. [24]

    Polman, and H

    A. Polman, and H. A. Atwater, Photonic design principles for ultrahigh-efficiency photovoltaics, Nat. Mater. 11, 174–177 (2012)

    2012

  17. [25]

    Z. Yu, A. Raman, and S. Fan, Fundamental limit of nanophotonic light trapping in solar cells, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 107, 17491-17496 (2010)

    2010

  18. [26]

    L. Zhu, A. Raman, K. X. Wang, M. A. Anoma, and S. Fan, Radiative cooling of solar cells, Optica 1, 32-38 (2014)

    2014

  19. [27]

    B. Zhao, J. M. Zhao, and Z. M. Zhang, Enhancement of near -infrared absorption in graphene with metal gratings , Appl. Phys. Lett. 105, 031905 (2014)

    2014

  20. [28]

    B. Zhao, B. Guizal, Z. M. Zhang, S. Fan, and M. Antezza, Near-field heat transfer between grap hene/hBN multilayers, Phys. Rev. B 95, 245437 (2017)

    2017

  21. [29]

    B. Zhao, K. Chen, S. Buddhiraju, G. Bhatt, M. Lipson, and S. Fan, High-performance near-field thermophotovoltaics for waste heat recovery, Nano Energy 41, 344-350 (2017)

    2017

  22. [30]

    Huang, A

    R. Huang, A. Miranowicz, J. Q. Liao, F. Nori, and H. Jing, Nonreciprocal photon blockade, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 153601 (2018)

    2018

  23. [31]

    D. L. Sounas, and A. Alù, Non-reciprocal photonics based on time modulation, Nat. Photon. 11, 774–783 (2017)

    2017

  24. [32]

    W. C. Snyder, Z. Wan, and X. Li, Thermodynamic constraints on reflectance reciprocity and Kirchhoff’s law, Appl. Opt. 37, 3464-3470 (1998)

    1998

  25. [33]

    Zhu, and S

    L. Zhu, and S. Fan, Persistent directional current at equilibrium in nonreciprocal many -body near field electromagnetic heat transfer , Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 134303 (2016)

    2016

  26. [34]

    Soo, and M

    H. Soo, and M. Krüger, Fluctuational electrodynamics for nonlinear materials in and out of thermal equilibrium , Phys. Rev. B 97, 045412 (2018)

    2018

  27. [35]

    Khandekar, and A

    C. Khandekar, and A. W. Rodriguez, Near-field thermal upconversion and energy transfer through a Kerr medium, Opt. Express 25, 23164- 23180 (2017)

    2017

  28. [36]

    C Khandekar, R Messina, and A. W. Rodriguez, Near-field refrigeration and tunable heat exchange through four-wave mixing, AIP Adv. 8, 055029 (2018)

    2018

  29. [37]

    Shi, and S

    Y. Shi, and S. Fan, Dynamic non-reciprocal meta-surfaces with arbitrary phase reconfigurability based on photonic transition in meta-atoms, Appl. Phys. Lett. 108, 021110 (2016)

    2016

  30. [38]

    Taravati, Giant linear nonreciprocity, zero reflection, and zero band gap in equilibrated space -time-varying media, Phys

    S. Taravati, Giant linear nonreciprocity, zero reflection, and zero band gap in equilibrated space -time-varying media, Phys. Rev. Appl. 9, 064012 (2018)

    2018

  31. [39]

    Taravati,and A

    S. Taravati,and A. A. Kishk, Space-time modulation: Principles and applications, IEEE Microw. Mag. 21, 30-56 (2020)

    2020

  32. [40]

    Ries, Complete and reversible absorption of radiation, Appl

    H. Ries, Complete and reversible absorption of radiation, Appl. Phys. B 32, 153-156 (1983)

    1983

  33. [41]

    Zhu, and S

    L. Zhu, and S. Fan, Near-complete violation of detailed balance in thermal radiation, Phys. Rev. B 90, 220301 (2014)

    2014

  34. [42]

    B. Zhao, Y. Shi, J. Wang, Z. Zhao, N. Zhao, and S. Fan, Near-complete violation of Kirchhoff’s law of thermal radiation with a 0.3 T magnetic field, Opt. Lett. 44, 4203-4206 (2019)

    2019

  35. [43]

    B. Zhao, C. Guo, C. A. C. Garcia, P. Narang, and S. Fan, Axion-field-enabled nonreciprocal thermal radiation in Weyl semimetals, Nano Lett. 20, 1923-1927 (2020)

    2020

  36. [44]

    J. Wu, B. Wu, K. Shi, X. Wu, and C. Fu, Strong nonreciprocal thermal radiation of transverse electric wave in Weyl semimetal, Int. J. Therm. Sci. 187, 108172 (2023)

    2023

  37. [45]

    Shaltout, A

    A. Shaltout, A. Kildishev, and V. Shalaev, Time-varying metasurfaces and Lorentz non-reciprocity, Opt. Mater. Express 5, 2459-2467 (2015)

    2015

  38. [46]

    Hadad, D

    Y . Hadad, D. L. Sounas, and A. Alu, Space-time gradient metasurfaces. Phys. Rev. B 92, 100304 (2015)

    2015

  39. [47]

    Zheng, J

    Y . Zheng, J. Yang, Z. Shen, J. Cao, X. Chen, X. Liang, and W. Wan, Optically induced transparency in a micro -cavity. Light Sci. Appl. 5, e16072-e16072 (2016)

    2016

  40. [48]

    J. Yang, L. Y uan, T. Qin, F. Zhang, Y . Chen, X. Jiang, X. Chen, S. Fan, and W. Wan, Phonon-induced anomalous gauge potential for photonic isolation in frequency space. Optica 8, 1448-1457 (2021)

    2021

  41. [49]

    Y. Shi, S. Han, and S. Fan, Optical circulation and isolation based on indirect photonic transitions of guided resonance modes, ACS Photon. 4, 1639-1645 (2017)

    2017

  42. [50]

    Butler, and C

    A. Butler, and C. Argyropoulos, Broadband and wide angle nonreciprocal thermal emission from Weyl semimetal structures, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 40, 2122-2128 (2023)

    2023

  43. [51]

    K. Shi, Y. Sun, R. Hu, and S. He, Ultra-broadband and wide-angle nonreciprocal thermal emitter based on Weyl semimetal metamaterials , Nano Photon. 13, 737-747 (2024)

    2024

  44. [52]

    K. J. Shayegan, J. S. Hwang, B. Zhao, A. P. Raman, and H. A. Atwater, Broadband nonreciprocal thermal emissivity and absorptivity, Light Sci. Appl. 13, 176 (2024)

    2024

  45. [53]

    K. J. Shayegan, B. Zhao, Y. Kim, S. Fan, and H. A. Atwater, Nonreciprocal infrared absorption via resonant magneto-optical coupling to InAs, Sci. Adv. 8, eabm4308 (2022)

    2022

  46. [54]

    Baudrier-Raybaut, R

    M. Baudrier-Raybaut, R. Haidar, P. Kupecek, P. Lemasson, and E. Rosencher, Random quasi-phase-matching in bulk polycrystalline isotropic nonlinear materials, Nature 432, 374-376 (2004)

    2004

  47. [55]

    Z. Zhou, W. Liu, H. Yan, X. Chen, and W. Wan, Nonlinear thermal emission and visible thermometry, Adv. Photon. 4, 045001-045001 (2022)

    2022

  48. [56]

    R. Ma, H. Yan, Z. Zhou, Y. Yu, and W. Wan, Nonlinear upconverted thermal emission through difference frequency generation, Opt. Lett. 49, 4565-4568 (2024)

    2024

  49. [57]

    Skauli, P

    T. Skauli, P. S. Kuo, K. L. V odopyanov, T. J. Pinguet, O. Levi, L. A. Eyres, J. S. Harris, M. M. Fejer, B. Gerard, L. Becouarn, and E. Lallier, Improved dispersion relations for GaAs and applications to nonlinear optics, J. Appl. Phys. 94, 6447-6455 (2003)

    2003

  50. [58]

    Amotchkina, M

    T. Amotchkina, M. Trubetskov, D. Hahner, and V. Pervak, Characterization of e-beam evaporated Ge, YbF_3, ZnS, and LaF_3 thin films for laser-oriented coatings, Appl. Opt. 59, A40-A47 (2020)

    2020

  51. [59]

    See Supplementary Materials

  52. [60]

    https://github.com/LALALA-coder007/DATA_SET

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.