Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 70 references

The detection of spatially resolved protosteller outflows and episodic jets in the outer Galaxy

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read First spatially resolved protostellar outflows and episodic jets are reported in the outer Galaxy, toward the source Sh 2–283-1a SMM1.

desk verdict Solid first resolved jet detection in the outer Galaxy, but the episodic timescales rest on eye-drawn PV ridges and should be softened. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.08601 v1 pith:TH3YMZ3N submitted 2025-06-10 astro-ph.GA

Toki Ikeda , Takashi Shimonishi , Natsuko Izumi , Hiroyuki Kaneko , Satoko Takahashi , Kei E. I. Tanaka , Kenji Furuya , Chikako Yasui This is my paper
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords protostellaroutflowsepisodicjetsouterGalaxylow-metallicitystarformationALMAobservationsposition-velocitydiagramSiOabundanceISM:and
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reports the first spatially resolved detection of protostellar outflows and jets in the outer Galaxy, in the massive protostellar source Sh 2–283-1a SMM1 at about 16 kpc from the Galactic center. Its CO(3–2) maps show a well-collimated bipolar jet with multiple bullet-like knots embedded in slower, wider outflows, and the position-velocity diagram along the flow axis shows velocities rising linearly with distance from the star. The authors read three 'spine-like' streaks in that diagram as separate mass-ejection events and derive ejection intervals of 900–4000 years, comparable to the intervals seen in nearby star-forming clouds. If this interpretation holds, low-metallicity outer-Galaxy protostars launch jets and outflows through the same mechanisms as inner-Galaxy sources, with the same episodic accretion behavior.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by the position-velocity (PV) diagram of CO(3–2) emission cut along the flow axis (position angle 1.1 degrees). The PV diagram does two jobs: its linear velocity-position rise (the 'Hubble-like flow') shows a single outflow accelerating away from the protostar, and its three 'spine-like structures' (S1, S2, S3) are interpreted as distinct jet-ejection episodes whose inverse slopes give the 900–4000 year intervals between ejections.

What would settle it

A follow-up observation of Sh 2–283-1a SMM1 with sub-arcsecond resolution in a jet tracer such as SiO(8–7) that resolves the individual bullet knots: if the measured knot separations and velocities do not reproduce ejection intervals of 900–4000 years, or if the spine-like features disappear at higher resolution, the episodic-ejection interpretation loses support.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Using ALMA observations of five outer-Galaxy star-forming regions, the authors detect CO(3–2) outflows toward five protostellar candidates, and in one source, Sh 2–283-1a SMM1, they resolve two kinematic components: an outflow component with relative velocities of about 5–50 km s$^{-1}$ and a jet component with about 50–100 km s$^{-1}$. The jets are well collimated and contain multiple bullet structures, and the blue-shifted jet is also detected in SiO(8–7). The position-velocity diagram along the flow axis shows a Hubble-like linear velocity rise plus three spine-like continuous features, which the authors interpret, following Takahashi et al. (2024) and the numerical models of Machida and Basu (2019), as episodic mass-ejection events. The slopes of the spines yield time intervals between ejections of roughly 900–4000 years, and the morphology, collimation, and dynamical properties resemble those of nearby protostellar sources. The authors conclude that early star formation in the low-metallicity outer Galaxy is physically similar to that in the inner Galaxy, although the $N$(SiO)/$N$(CO) ratio in the jet bullet is lower than in inner-Galaxy low-mass sources, possibly reflecting different shock chemistry or dust composition, with non-LTE effects as an alternative explanation.

Load-bearing premise

The episodic-jet claim rests on treating the three 'spine-like' features in the position-velocity diagram as distinct mass-ejection events rather than as, for example, bow shocks, precession, or ambient velocity structure, with no statistical test ruling out these alternatives.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the detection holds, the outer Galaxy is no longer an exception: protostars in low-metallicity environments launch well-collimated jets with episodic bullets just like inner-Galaxy sources.
  • The 900–4000 year ejection intervals imply that episodic accretion variability occurs in a massive protostar at about 16 kpc, linking outflow bullet spacing to the accretion history of the central object.
  • The low $N$(SiO)/$N$(CO) ratio measured in the jet bullet, about an order of magnitude below that of nearby low-mass protostars like L1448, points toward different shock chemistry or different dust composition in the outer Galaxy, though non-LTE excitation effects could also explain it.
  • The detection of four additional outflow sources (NOMF05-16-1, NOMF05-23-1, NOMF05-23-3, NOMF05-63-1) indicates that active outflow-driven star formation is ongoing in the outer Galaxy at galactocentric distances near 17 kpc.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Inference: if the spine-slope timing is right, the bullets should be separated along the jet by roughly 0.03–0.1 pc; resolving the jet at sub-arcsecond resolution would let observers check whether the observed R1–R4 and B1–B2 knot spacings match the predicted ejection cadence.
  • Inference: comparing SiO(8–7)/CO(3–2) against additional outer-Galaxy sources, or observing lower-excitation CO and SiO lines, would separate a genuine metallicity effect on shock chemistry from a non-LTE excitation artifact.
  • Inference: applying the same PV-diagram spine analysis to the four newly detected outer-Galaxy outflows would test whether episodic ejection is a general feature of low-metallicity star formation or specific to the more massive Sh 2–283-1a SMM1.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. This paper reports ALMA Band 7 observations of 16 protostellar candidates in five outer-Galaxy star-forming regions (galactocentric distances 15.7–17.4 kpc). Toward the intermediate/high-mass protostar Sh 2-283-1a SMM1, the authors detect spatially resolved CO(3-2) outflow (relative velocities ~5–50 km/s) and jet (~50–100 km/s) components, including multiple bullet structures, plus an SiO(8-7) jet counterpart and an HCO+(4-3) outflow counterpart. A position-velocity diagram along the flow axis shows a Hubble-like velocity increase with distance and three 'spine-like' ridges (S1–S3), which the authors interpret as episodic mass-ejection events with intervals of 900–4000 years. They also derive LTE dynamical properties for the outflows and jets, compare the SiO/CO column-density ratio with those of inner-Galaxy low-mass jet sources, and report four additional CO outflow detections in the other target regions. The paper's central claim is that this is the first spatially resolved detection of protostellar outflows and jets in the low-metallicity outer Galaxy, indicating that early star formation there resembles the inner Galaxy.

Significance. If the detection and the episodic interpretation hold, the paper extends the jet/outflow paradigm to a poorly explored low-metallicity environment and provides a concrete target for future higher-resolution and multi-line follow-up. The strengths of the paper are that the CO and SiO jet/outflow detections are supported by standard ALMA calibration and imaging, the morphology and velocity structure are shown clearly in the figures, the authors explicitly acknowledge that the LTE-derived dynamical masses are lower limits, and the non-LTE RADEX calculations for the SiO/CO ratio are a useful caution against overinterpreting single-transition abundance ratios. The main result that needs additional support is the episodic-ejection timescale claim, which currently rests on by-eye identification of PV ridges rather than on a quantitative analysis.

major comments (3)
  1. [§4.2, Figure 5] The episodic mass-ejection timescales (900–4000 yr) rest entirely on the three 'spine-like' lines S1–S3, which are drawn by eye in the PV diagram with no fitting criterion, no slope uncertainties, and no statistical test against alternative kinematic models. The PV slice has a synthesized beam of 0.79″ and each spine spans only a few independent beams, so the adopted slopes (6.2–33.3 km s−1 arcsec−1) and the derived time intervals are not uniquely determined. Because 'episodic jets' appears in the title and the interval estimate appears in the abstract, this is a load-bearing step. Please define objectively how the ridgelines were extracted (for example, fits to PV-intensity peaks in position-velocity windows), propagate the uncertainties in the slopes, and compare the S1–S3 structures against a null model of a smooth Hubble-flow outflow (including limb-brightened edges) and against alternatives such as precession or bow shocks. The separate CO/SiO jet and bullet detections do not depend on this step, but the episodic claim does.
  2. [§4.1, Table 5] The dynamical quantities in Table 5 are presented without uncertainties, even though the text acknowledges that LTE CO(3-2) masses can be underestimated by 1–2 orders of magnitude and that missing flux and the assumed inclination i = 45° further affect the results. The comparison with inner-Galaxy massive protostars (Beuther et al. 2002; Maud et al. 2015) is therefore a lower-limit consistency check, not a quantitative similarity statement. Please propagate the systematic uncertainties from Eq. (2) (including X_CO, metallicity, missing flux, and subthermal excitation) and from Eq. (1) (including Lobs and Vobs), or apply a non-LTE correction. At minimum, the 'physical similarity' conclusion in the abstract and §4.1 should be explicitly restricted to morphological and velocity structure unless the dynamical comparison is made on a corrected or bounded basis.
  3. [§4.3, Eq. (3)] The conclusion that N(SiO)/N(CO) in the jet bullet is 'more than an order of magnitude lower' than in L1448 depends on adopting L1448's rotational temperatures (Trot(CO) = 11 K, Trot(SiO) = 100–500 K) for Sh 2-283-1a SMM1, without any excitation measurement for the target. The RADEX calculations in the same section show that N(SiO)/N(CO) varies by roughly an order of magnitude or more with n(H2) and Tkin, so the low abundance ratio is not uniquely established. The abstract should either quote the non-LTE range or explicitly state that the lower ratio is obtained only under one adopted excitation scenario; the caveats in the text are appropriate but the headline statement is stronger than the data currently support.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Title, Introduction] The title contains the typo 'protosteller' and the typeset version has 'outflows a nd'; the Introduction also contains 'low-matellicity' (Section 1).
  2. [Table 1 note] The Gaia source ID is given as '83 3119827723711464576' in the table note, while the text reads '3119827723711464576'; the extra '83' appears to be a typo and should be corrected.
  3. [Figure 5 caption] The caption says 'yellow allow' instead of 'yellow arrow'; also, the figure would be easier to interpret if the PV-plane beam size and the adopted S1–S3 fitting windows were overlaid.
  4. [§3.1] The sentence 'The terminal velocities of the outflows are determined by the morphology of the emission distribution and the line shape' is qualitative; since the outflow/jet separation underpins Table 4, a more explicit operational criterion (or a reference to an example channel map) would improve reproducibility.
  5. [§4.3.1] The reference citation contains a typo: 'e,g.,' should read 'e.g.,'.
  6. [§4.1] The phrase 'with assuming' should be 'assuming' or 'with the assumption of' in several places; the manuscript would also benefit from a brief statement of the assumed line opacity and excitation regime in the caption of Table 5.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the detection and episodic-jet interpretation rest on direct ALMA imaging and external comparisons; the by-eye spine identification is an uncertainty, not a definitional reduction.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation chain is observational rather than definitional. The outflow and jet detections are made directly from ALMA CO(3-2), SiO(8-7), and HCO+(4-3) images and spectra, with velocity ranges set by the FWTM of the HCO+ line and 3-sigma noise thresholds. The episodic timescale of 900-4000 years is obtained from the slopes of spine-like structures in the observed position-velocity diagram, and no equation in Section 4.2 reduces that timescale to a fitted parameter or to a literature value. The interpretation of the spines as episodic ejections is anchored to external or independent work: the numerical simulations of Machida & Basu (2019) as presented in Takahashi et al. (2024), and the comparable-resolution observations of Nony et al. (2020); although Takahashi et al. is by a coauthor, the load-bearing numerical result is external and the Nony et al. comparison is independent. The luminosity estimate uses a scaling from Shimonishi et al. (2021), but this is an ancillary consistency check, cross-checked with the Maud et al. (2015) outflow-mass-luminosity relation, and it does not feed back into the detection or episodic claim. The SiO/CO comparison uses published column densities and an acknowledged RADEX non-LTE analysis; the paper explicitly cautions that the abundance ratio depends on assumed density, which is an uncertainty rather than circularity. The by-eye identification of S1-S3 and the absence of a statistical test against alternative kinematic models are correctness risks, not circular reductions. No claimed prediction is equivalent to its input by construction, and no load-bearing step reduces to a self-citation chain.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The observations rest on standard interferometric calibration and line physics. The main interpretive parameters are the assumed inclination, the LTE and optically thin column density assumptions, the adopted CO conversion factor, and the density assumed for non-LTE calculations. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (5)
  • Inclination angle i = 45 degrees
    Assumed for all dynamical quantities in Tables 5 and 6. The paper notes that i > 84 degrees changes derived values by about an order of magnitude.
  • Rotational temperature of CO = 11 K adopted for L1448 comparison; 150 K for Orion comparison
    Used in LTE column density derivation. Only one CO transition is detected, so Trot is taken from the literature.
  • Rotational temperature of SiO = 100 to 500 K for L1448 comparison; 150 K uniform case
    Used in LTE column density derivation. Only one SiO transition is detected, so Trot cannot be measured directly.
  • CO-to-H2 conversion factor X_CO = 5 x 10^20 cm^-2 (K km/s)^-1
    Metallicity-corrected value adopted from Bolatto et al. (2013) for converting CO intensity to outflow mass.
  • H2 density n(H2) in non-LTE RADEX calculations = 10^5 to 10^6 cm^-3
    Assumed typical jet bullet density. The resulting N(SiO)/N(CO) ratio differs by a factor of about 50 between the two densities.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption CO(3-2) and SiO(8-7) emission in the jet component is optically thin and in LTE for the column density derivation.
    Stated in Section 4.3.1. The LTE assumption is standard but unverified because only one transition per molecule is detected.
  • domain assumption The spine-like structures in the PV diagram represent episodic mass-ejection events.
    Central interpretive assumption in Section 4.2, based on analogy with Takahashi et al. (2024) and Nony et al. (2020). No quantitative fitting or alternative-structure test is given.
  • domain assumption The CO-to-H2 conversion factor X_CO = 5 x 10^20 cm^-2 (K km/s)^-1 is valid in the outer Galaxy low-metallicity environment.
    Adopted from Bolatto et al. (2013) in Section 4.1. The paper does not independently calibrate this factor for the target regions.
  • domain assumption SiO emission traces shocked gas and is physically associated with the CO jet component.
    Used in Section 3.2 to link the SiO jet to the CO jet. This is a standard astrochemical assumption for SiO in protostellar outflows.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The detection of spatially resolved protosteller outflows and episodic jets in the outer Galaxy." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TH3YMZ3N

@misc{pith2026250608601,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The detection of spatially resolved protosteller outflows and episodic jets in the outer Galaxy},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TH3YMZ3N}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.08601}
}
abstract

We present the first detection of spatially resolved protostellar outflows and jets in the outer Galaxy. We observed five star-forming regions in the outer Galaxy (Sh 2--283, NOMF05-16/19/23/63; galactocentric distance = 15.7--17.4 kpc) with the Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA). Towards Sh 2--283, we have detected distinct outflow ($\sim$5--50 km s$^{-1}$) and jet components ($\sim$50--100 km s$^{-1}$) associated with the protostar in CO(3--2) emission. The outflows and jets are well-collimated, with the jets exhibiting multiple bullet structures. The position-velocity diagram along the CO flow axis shows two characteristic structures: (a) the flow velocity which linearly increases with the position offset from the core center (Hubble-like flow), and (b) continuous velocity components of the periodical flows (spine-like structures), which may indicate the episodic mass-ejection event. The time intervals of the mass-ejection events are estimated to be 900--4000 years based on the slopes of these spine-like structures. These characteristics align with those of nearby protostellar systems, indicating that early star formation in low-metallicity environments, such as the outer Galaxy, resembles that in the inner Galaxy. In contrast to the physical similarities, the $N\mathrm{(SiO)}$/$N\mathrm{(CO)}$ ratio in the jet bullet appears to be lower than that measured in the low-mass protostellar sources in the inner Galaxy. This may indicate the different shock chemistry or different dust composition in the outer Galaxy source, although non-LTE effects could also affect the observed low $N\mathrm{(SiO)}$/$N\mathrm{(CO)}$ ratio. We also report the new detection of the other 4 outflow sources in the outer Galaxy.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.08601 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The spectra of CO(J = 3–2), which is extracted from the 4. ′′0 × 10. ′′0 elliptical region around Sh 2–283–1a SMM1 ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. (a) The CO(J = 3–2) integrated intensity map of the red-shifted jet components is shown. The white crosses denote the positions of the jet bullets which are identified from the emission peaks in the integrated intensity map of the jet components. The number labels represent the emitting order of the jet bullets. (b) The integrated intensity map of the outflows and jets is presented. The color map and contour lines r… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. (a) The spectra of SiO(J = 8–7) (magenta) and CO(J = 3–2) (black) are shown. The spectra are extracted from a 2. ′′0 × 5. ′′0 elliptical region centered on the protostar, as indicated by the black ellipse in panel (b). The green-shaded area represents the jet component. The red and black dotted lines represent the 3σ rms noise level (1σ = 0.005 K) of SiO(J = 8–7) and the systemic velocity of Sh 2–283–1a SMM1 (53.2 k… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a) The spectra of HCO+(J = 4–3) (magenta) and CO(J = 3–2) (black) are shown. The spectra are extracted from a 4. ′′0 × 10. ′′0 elliptical region centered on the protostar, as indicated by the black ellipse in panel (b). In the spectrum, the yellow-shaded area represen…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The position-velocity diagram of Sh 2–283–1a SMM1 along the flow axis (p.a = 1.1◦ ). The contour levels are at 5, 7, 10, 15, 25, 35, 45, 75, 115, 165, and 300σ of the rms noise level, with 1σ equals to 1.8 mJy beam−1 . The vertical dotted lines to the horizontal axis s…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Newly detected outflow sources in the outer Galaxy. The upper panels represent the spectra of CO(J = 3–2) (black) and HCO+(J = 4–3) (magenta). The spectra of CO(J = 3–2) are extracted from the elliptical region as shown in the lower panels, while the spectra of HCO+(J …

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

70 extracted references · 25 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    G., Shepherd , D., Gueth , F., et al

    Arce , H. G., Shepherd , D., Gueth , F., et al. 2007, in Protostars and Planets V, ed. B. Reipurth , D. Jewitt , & K. Keil , 245, 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0603071

    arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.astro-ph/0603071 2007

  2. [2]

    Z., Esteban , C., Garc \' a-Rojas , J., & M \'e ndez-Delgado , J

    Arellano-C \'o rdova , K. Z., Esteban , C., Garc \' a-Rojas , J., & M \'e ndez-Delgado , J. E. 2021, , 502, 225, 10.1093/mnras/staa3903

    doi:10.1093/mnras/staa3903 2021

  3. [3]

    1996, , 34, 111, 10.1146/annurev.astro.34.1.111

    Bachiller , R. 1996, , 34, 111, 10.1146/annurev.astro.34.1.111

    doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.34.1.111 1996

  4. [4]

    1990, , 231, 174

    Bachiller , R., Cernicharo , J., Martin-Pintado , J., Tafalla , M., & Lazareff , B. 1990, , 231, 174

    work page 1990

  5. [5]

    2007, , 462, 429, 10.1051/0004-6361:20065568

    Balestra , I., Tozzi , P., Ettori , S., et al. 2007, , 462, 429, 10.1051/0004-6361:20065568

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20065568 2007

  6. [6]

    2016, , 54, 491, 10.1146/annurev-astro-081915-023341

    Bally , J. 2016, , 54, 491, 10.1146/annurev-astro-081915-023341

    doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081915-023341 2016

  7. [7]

    K., et al

    Beuther , H., Schilke , P., Sridharan , T. K., et al. 2002, , 383, 892, 10.1051/0004-6361:20011808

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20011808 2002

  8. [8]

    D., Wolfire , M., & Leroy , A

    Bolatto , A. D., Wolfire , M., & Leroy , A. K. 2013, , 51, 207, 10.1146/annurev-astro-082812-140944

    doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-082812-140944 2013

Show all 70 references
  1. [9]

    A., Daflon , S., Lanz , T., et al

    Bragan c a , G. A., Daflon , S., Lanz , T., et al. 2019, , 625, A120, 10.1051/0004-6361/201834554

    2019 doi

  2. [10]

    2022, , 134, 114501, 10.1088/1538-3873/ac9642

    CASA Team , Bean , B., Bhatnagar , S., et al. 2022, , 134, 114501, 10.1088/1538-3873/ac9642

    2022 doi

  3. [11]

    2019, , 877, 112, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab15d4

    Cheng , Y., Qiu , K., Zhang , Q., et al. 2019, , 877, 112, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab15d4

    2019 doi

  4. [12]

    2019, , 624, A78, 10.1051/0004-6361/201834783

    Delgado Mena , E., Moya , A., Adibekyan , V., et al. 2019, , 624, A78, 10.1051/0004-6361/201834783

    2019 doi

  5. [13]

    M., Arce , H

    Dunham , M. M., Arce , H. G., Mardones , D., et al. 2014, , 783, 29, 10.1088/0004-637X/783/1/29

    2014 doi

  6. [14]

    2022, , 931, 130, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac67a1

    Dutta , S., Lee , C.-F., Hirano , N., et al. 2022, , 931, 130, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac67a1

    2022 doi

  7. [15]

    2024, , 167, 72, 10.3847/1538-3881/ad152b

    Dutta , S., Lee , C.-F., Johnstone , D., et al. 2024, , 167, 72, 10.3847/1538-3881/ad152b

    2024 doi

  8. [16]

    M., Curiel , S., et al

    Fern \'a ndez-L \'o pez , M., Girart , J. M., Curiel , S., et al. 2013, , 778, 72, 10.1088/0004-637X/778/1/72

    2013 doi

  9. [17]

    M., & Mampaso , A

    Fern \'a ndez-Mart \' n , A., P \'e rez-Montero , E., V \' lchez , J. M., & Mampaso , A. 2017, , 597, A84, 10.1051/0004-6361/201628423

    2017 doi

  10. [18]

    1991, , 366, 107, 10.1086/169544

    Fich , M., & Silkey , M. 1991, , 366, 107, 10.1086/169544

    1991 doi

  11. [19]

    J., Hillenbrand , L

    Fischer , W. J., Hillenbrand , L. A., Herczeg , G. J., et al. 2023, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 534, Protostars and Planets VII, ed. S. Inutsuka , Y. Aikawa , T. Muto , K. Tomida , & M. Tamura , 355, 10.48550/arXiv.2203.11257

    2023 doi arXiv

  12. [20]

    2015, , 807, L4, 10.1088/2041-8205/807/1/L4

    Fukui , Y., Harada , R., Tokuda , K., et al. 2015, , 807, L4, 10.1088/2041-8205/807/1/L4

    2015 doi

  13. [21]

    Gaia Collaboration , Brown , A. G. A., Vallenari , A., et al. 2021, , 649, A1, 10.1051/0004-6361/202039657

    2021 doi

  14. [22]

    Ginsburg , A., Bally , J., & Williams , J. P. 2011, , 418, 2121, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19279.x

    2011

  15. [23]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2405.01710, 10.48550/arXiv.2405.01710

    Hamedani Golshan , R., S \'a nchez-Monge , \'A ., Schilke , P., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2405.01710, 10.48550/arXiv.2405.01710

    2024 doi arXiv

  16. [24]

    Hirano , N., Ho , P. P. T., Liu , S.-Y., et al. 2010, , 717, 58, 10.1088/0004-637X/717/1/58

    2010 doi

  17. [25]

    E., Lau , R

    Izumi , N., Ressler , M. E., Lau , R. M., et al. 2024, , 168, 68, 10.3847/1538-3881/ad4e2e

    2024 doi

  18. [26]

    G., Reipurth , B., Ostriker , E

    Lee , C.-F., Mundy , L. G., Reipurth , B., Ostriker , E. C., & Stone , J. M. 2000, , 542, 925, 10.1086/317056

    2000 doi

  19. [27]

    2015, , 581, A4, 10.1051/0004-6361/201425521

    Lefloch , B., Gusdorf , A., Codella , C., et al. 2015, , 581, A4, 10.1051/0004-6361/201425521

    2015 doi

  20. [28]

    2021, , 649, A4, 10.1051/0004-6361/202039653

    Lindegren , L., Bastian , U., Biermann , M., et al. 2021, , 649, A4, 10.1051/0004-6361/202039653

    2021 doi

  21. [29]

    2018, , 618, A120, 10.1051/0004-6361/201731733

    Louvet , F., Dougados , C., Cabrit , S., et al. 2018, , 618, A120, 10.1051/0004-6361/201731733

    2018 doi

  22. [30]

    W., Hoare , M

    Lucas , P. W., Hoare , M. G., Longmore , A., et al. 2008, , 391, 136, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13924.x

    2008

  23. [31]

    N., & Basu , S

    Machida , M. N., & Basu , S. 2019, , 876, 149, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab18a7

    2019 doi

  24. [32]

    G., & Shirley , Y

    Mangum , J. G., & Shirley , Y. L. 2015, , 127, 266, 10.1086/680323

    2015 doi

  25. [33]

    N., & Tomisaka , K

    Matsushita , Y., Takahashi , S., Machida , M. N., & Tomisaka , K. 2019, , 871, 221, 10.3847/1538-4357/aaf1b6

    2019 doi

  26. [34]

    T., Moore , T

    Maud , L. T., Moore , T. J. T., Lumsden , S. L., et al. 2015, , 453, 645, 10.1093/mnras/stv1635

    2015 doi

  27. [35]

    u ller , H. S. P., Schl \

    M \"u ller , H. S. P., Schl \"o der , F., Stutzki , J., et al. 2005, in Astrochemistry: Recent Successes and Current Challenges, ed. D. C. Lis , G. A. Blake , & E. Herbst , Vol. 231, 62

    2005

  28. [36]

    M \"u ller , H. S. P., Thorwirth , S., Roth , D. A., & Winnewisser , G. 2001, , 370, L49, 10.1051/0004-6361:20010367

    2001 doi

  29. [37]

    2005, , 57, 917, 10.1093/pasj/57.6.917

    Nakagawa , M., Onishi , T., Mizuno , A., & Fukui , Y. 2005, , 57, 917, 10.1093/pasj/57.6.917

    2005 doi

  30. [38]

    2007, , 462, 163, 10.1051/0004-6361:20065621

    Nisini , B., Codella , C., Giannini , T., et al. 2007, , 462, 163, 10.1051/0004-6361:20065621

    2007 doi

  31. [39]

    2020, , 636, A38, 10.1051/0004-6361/201937046

    Nony , T., Motte , F., Louvet , F., et al. 2020, , 636, A38, 10.1051/0004-6361/201937046

    2020 doi

  32. [40]

    Omura , M., Tokuda , K., & Machida , M. N. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2401.03086, 10.48550/arXiv.2401.03086

    2024 doi arXiv

  33. [41]

    L., Arce , H

    Plunkett , A. L., Arce , H. G., Mardones , D., et al. 2015, , 527, 70, 10.1038/nature15702

    2015 doi

  34. [42]

    Pyo , T.-S., Hayashi , M., Takami , M., & Beck , T. L. 2024, , 963, 159, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad1f59

    2024 doi

  35. [43]

    2009, , 702, L66, 10.1088/0004-637X/702/1/L66

    Qiu , K., & Zhang , Q. 2009, , 702, L66, 10.1088/0004-637X/702/1/L66

    2009 doi

  36. [44]

    M., Prochaska , J

    Rafelski , M., Wolfe , A. M., Prochaska , J. X., Neeleman , M., & Mendez , A. J. 2012, , 755, 89, 10.1088/0004-637X/755/2/89

    2012 doi

  37. [45]

    J., Menten , K

    Reid , M. J., Menten , K. M., Brunthaler , A., et al. 2014, , 783, 130, 10.1088/0004-637X/783/2/130

    2014 doi

  38. [46]

    P., Whitney , B

    Robitaille , T. P., Whitney , B. A., Indebetouw , R., Wood , K., & Denzmore , P. 2006, , 167, 256, 10.1086/508424

    2006 doi

  39. [47]

    2009, , 495, 169, 10.1051/0004-6361:200810739

    Santiago-Garc \' a , J., Tafalla , M., Johnstone , D., & Bachiller , R. 2009, , 495, 169, 10.1051/0004-6361:200810739

    2009 doi

  40. [48]

    M., Pineau des Forets , G., & Flower , D

    Schilke , P., Walmsley , C. M., Pineau des Forets , G., & Flower , D. R. 1997, , 321, 293

    1997

  41. [49]

    B., et al

    Sewi o , M., Indebetouw , R., Charnley , S. B., et al. 2018, , 853, L19, 10.3847/2041-8213/aaa079

    2018 doi

  42. [50]

    B., et al

    Sewi o , M., Cordiner , M., Charnley , S. B., et al. 2022, , 931, 102, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac4e8f

    2022 doi

  43. [51]

    2020, , 891, 164, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab6e6b

    Shimonishi , T., Das , A., Sakai , N., et al. 2020, , 891, 164, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab6e6b

    2020 doi

  44. [52]

    2021, , 922, 206, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac289b

    Shimonishi , T., Izumi , N., Furuya , K., & Yasui , C. 2021, , 922, 206, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac289b

    2021 doi

  45. [53]

    2016, , 827, 72, 10.3847/0004-637X/827/1/72

    Shimonishi , T., Onaka , T., Kawamura , A., & Aikawa , Y. 2016, , 827, 72, 10.3847/0004-637X/827/1/72

    2016 doi

  46. [54]

    Shimonishi , T., Tanaka , K. E. I., Zhang , Y., & Furuya , K. 2023, , 946, L41, 10.3847/2041-8213/acc031

    2023 doi

  47. [55]

    L., Loren , R

    Snell , R. L., Loren , R. B., & Plambeck , R. L. 1980, , 239, L17, 10.1086/183283

    1980 doi

  48. [56]

    Tabone , B., Godard , B., Pineau des For \^e ts , G., Cabrit , S., & van Dishoeck , E. F. 2020, , 636, A60, 10.1051/0004-6361/201937383

    2020 doi

  49. [57]

    2010, , 522, A91, 10.1051/0004-6361/201015158

    Tafalla , M., Santiago-Garc \' a , J., Hacar , A., & Bachiller , R. 2010, , 522, A91, 10.1051/0004-6361/201015158

    2010 doi

  50. [58]

    N., Omura , M., et al

    Takahashi , S., Machida , M. N., Omura , M., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2401.13204, 10.48550/arXiv.2401.13204

    2024 doi arXiv

  51. [59]

    M., Schneider , P

    Takami , M., G \"u nther , H. M., Schneider , P. C., et al. 2023, , 264, 1, 10.3847/1538-4365/ac9afc

    2023 doi

  52. [60]

    2022, , 936, L6, 10.3847/2041-8213/ac81c1

    Tokuda , K., Zahorecz , S., Kunitoshi , Y., et al. 2022, , 936, L6, 10.3847/2041-8213/ac81c1

    2022 doi

  53. [61]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2501.02190, 10.48550/arXiv.2501.02190

    Tokuda , K., Kunitoshi , Y., Zahorecz , S., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2501.02190, 10.48550/arXiv.2501.02190

    2025 doi arXiv

  54. [62]

    M., Patel , N

    Torrelles , J. M., Patel , N. A., Curiel , S., et al. 2011, , 410, 627, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17483.x

    2011

  55. [63]

    Tychoniec , ., Hull , C. L. H., Kristensen , L. E., et al. 2019, , 632, A101, 10.1051/0004-6361/201935409

    2019 doi

  56. [64]

    van der Tak , F. F. S., Black , J. H., Sch \"o ier , F. L., Jansen , D. J., & van Dishoeck , E. F. 2007, , 468, 627, 10.1051/0004-6361:20066820

    2007 doi

  57. [65]

    L., Eisenhardt , P

    Wright , E. L., Eisenhardt , P. R. M., Mainzer , A. K., et al. 2010, , 140, 1868, 10.1088/0004-6256/140/6/1868

    2010 doi

  58. [67]

    2004 b , , 426, 503, 10.1051/0004-6361:20035767

    ---. 2004 b , , 426, 503, 10.1051/0004-6361:20035767

    2004 doi

  59. [68]

    2010, VizieR Online Data Catalog, II/298

    Yamamura , I., Makiuti , S., Ikeda , N., et al. 2010, VizieR Online Data Catalog, II/298

    2010

  60. [69]

    I., Dewangan , L

    Zinchenko , I. I., Dewangan , L. K., Baug , T., Ojha , D. K., & Bhadari , N. K. 2021, , 506, L45, 10.1093/mnrasl/slab070

    2021 doi

  61. [70]

    I., Liu , S

    Zinchenko , I. I., Liu , S. Y., & Su , Y. N. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2411.00116. 2411.00116

    2024 arXiv

  62. [71]

    I., Liu , S.-Y., Su , Y.-N., Wang , K.-S., & Wang , Y

    Zinchenko , I. I., Liu , S.-Y., Su , Y.-N., Wang , K.-S., & Wang , Y. 2020, , 889, 43, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab5c18

    2020 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.