Cosmic filaments confirm unexplained CMB temperature decrements in two independent redshift ranges
Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 10:15 UTC · model grok-4.3
The pith
Cosmic filaments show a 3-4 sigma CMB temperature decrement that grows with mass and line-of-sight alignment in two redshift ranges.
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
Core claim
The central claim is a 3-4 sigma detection of lower CMB temperatures toward the spines of cosmic filaments. The decrement increases with filament mass, estimated from linear K-band luminosity density, and with greater radial orientation relative to the line of sight. The trend is recovered independently in the two redshift intervals 0.004 < z < 0.02 and 0.02 < z < 0.04, extending the previously reported cooling effect to z < 0.04.
What carries the argument
Mean CMB temperature profiles stacked around three-dimensional cosmic filament spines, using thresholds on linear K-band luminosity density as a mass proxy and measuring average filament orientation to the line of sight to test path-length dependence.
Load-bearing premise
K-band luminosity density traces true mass density in filaments and the identification plus orientation measurements contain no selection or projection biases that could create a false temperature trend.
What would settle it
A larger independent filament catalog showing no temperature decrement, or the same decrement strength when filament orientations are randomized in the stack, would falsify the reported mass and orientation dependence.
Figures
read the original abstract
Recent papers have reported an unexplained cooling of CMB photons passing through galaxies in nearby cosmic filaments $z<0.02$ at the $>5\sigma$ level. Here we show for the first time that this effect is also present at higher redshifts $0.02<z<0.04$. Instead of calculating the CMB temperature around individual galaxies as in previous works, we analyze mean CMB temperature profiles associated to cosmic filaments in three dimensions. We have considered different thresholds in the linear K-band luminosity density of the filaments as a proxy to mass density. Furthermore, we have analyzed the dependence of the results on the average orientation of filaments with respect to the line of sight. These studies were implemented to test the expected dependence on mass density as well as on photon trajectory length within the cosmic filaments. We find a $3-4\sigma$ detection of a CMB temperature decrement trend towards the spine of the filaments, the larger the mass and the more radially oriented the filament, the stronger the CMB temperature decrement. This trend is seen independently in both redshift ranges $0.004<z<0.02$ and $0.02<z<0.04$. We therefore conclude that our results provide strong evidence for a lower CMB temperature along massive cosmic filaments in the nearby universe $z<0.04$.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The paper analyzes stacked CMB temperature profiles around cosmic filaments identified in two independent low-redshift bins (0.004<z<0.02 and 0.02<z<0.04), using thresholds in linear K-band luminosity density as a mass proxy. It reports a 3-4σ trend of stronger temperature decrements toward filament spines for higher-mass and more radially oriented filaments, with the trend appearing independently in both redshift ranges, and concludes this constitutes evidence for lower CMB temperatures along massive nearby filaments.
Significance. If the central result is robust, the work would extend prior reports of unexplained CMB decrements in z<0.02 filaments to a higher-redshift slice and add mass- and orientation-dependent trends that could help discriminate physical interpretations (e.g., longer photon paths) from systematics. The use of two independent redshift ranges and explicit tests of orientation and luminosity-density dependence are positive features that strengthen the observational case.
major comments (2)
- [Filament orientation measurement and redshift-space analysis] The reported dependence of the temperature decrement on filament orientation relative to the line of sight is load-bearing for the physical interpretation. Orientations are derived from the 3D galaxy distribution in redshift space, yet the manuscript provides no quantitative validation against mock catalogs that include realistic peculiar velocities. At z<0.04, redshift-space distortions can stretch or align apparent filament spines along the line of sight, potentially coupling to the luminosity-density selection and producing a spurious trend that mimics the claimed mass and orientation dependence.
- [Statistical analysis and significance estimation] The abstract states 3-4σ detections, but the manuscript does not supply a complete description of the error budget, baseline subtraction procedure, or covariance estimation that accounts for CMB map noise, filament identification thresholds, and possible correlations between mass and orientation selections. Without these details it is not possible to verify whether the quoted significance is robust or whether residual systematics could explain the observed trends.
minor comments (2)
- [Methods] The definition and units of the linear K-band luminosity density threshold should be stated explicitly, ideally with an equation, to allow readers to reproduce the mass-proxy cuts.
- [Results figures] Temperature profile figures would benefit from explicit null-test curves (e.g., random filament positions or rotated orientations) and clearer indication of the radial range used for the spine measurement.
Simulated Author's Rebuttal
We thank the referee for the constructive report and for recognizing the value of extending the analysis to a second independent redshift range along with mass and orientation trends. We address each major comment below and will incorporate revisions to strengthen the manuscript.
read point-by-point responses
-
Referee: [Filament orientation measurement and redshift-space analysis] The reported dependence of the temperature decrement on filament orientation relative to the line of sight is load-bearing for the physical interpretation. Orientations are derived from the 3D galaxy distribution in redshift space, yet the manuscript provides no quantitative validation against mock catalogs that include realistic peculiar velocities. At z<0.04, redshift-space distortions can stretch or align apparent filament spines along the line of sight, potentially coupling to the luminosity-density selection and producing a spurious trend that mimics the claimed mass and orientation dependence.
Authors: We agree that explicit validation of the orientation measurements against redshift-space distortions is important given the low redshifts involved. Filament orientations are obtained from the principal axis of the 3D luminosity-density field. We will add a dedicated subsection with quantitative tests on mock catalogs that include realistic peculiar velocities, demonstrating that the recovered orientation trends remain robust and do not generate spurious mass- or orientation-dependent signals capable of explaining the observed CMB decrements. These tests will be presented alongside the existing results from the two independent redshift bins. revision: yes
-
Referee: [Statistical analysis and significance estimation] The abstract states 3-4σ detections, but the manuscript does not supply a complete description of the error budget, baseline subtraction procedure, or covariance estimation that accounts for CMB map noise, filament identification thresholds, and possible correlations between mass and orientation selections. Without these details it is not possible to verify whether the quoted significance is robust or whether residual systematics could explain the observed trends.
Authors: We acknowledge that a fuller exposition of the statistical methodology is needed for independent verification. The quoted 3-4σ values are derived from stacked temperature profiles with bootstrap resampling over filaments and inclusion of CMB map variance. In the revised manuscript we will expand the methods section to provide an explicit error budget, a step-by-step description of the baseline subtraction (using control regions away from filaments), and the full covariance estimation that incorporates CMB instrumental noise, variations in filament identification thresholds, and any covariances arising from joint mass and orientation selections. This will allow readers to reproduce and assess the robustness of the reported significances. revision: yes
Circularity Check
No significant circularity: direct observational stacking result
full rationale
The paper performs an empirical stacking analysis of CMB temperature maps on positions and orientations of cosmic filaments identified from galaxy catalogs in two redshift slices. The reported 3-4σ trend with luminosity-density threshold and line-of-sight orientation is measured directly from the data rather than obtained by fitting a model whose parameters already encode the target decrement or by any self-referential definition. No equations, ansatzes, or predictions are shown that reduce the central claim to its inputs by construction; the analysis chain remains self-contained as an independent measurement against external CMB and galaxy survey data.
Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger
free parameters (1)
- luminosity density thresholds
axioms (2)
- domain assumption K-band luminosity density is a monotonic proxy for filament mass density
- domain assumption Filament orientation relative to line of sight can be reliably measured from the catalog
Lean theorems connected to this paper
-
IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.leanwashburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear?
unclearRelation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.
We find a 3-4σ detection of a CMB temperature decrement trend towards the spine of the filaments, the larger the mass and the more radially oriented the filament, the stronger the CMB temperature decrement.
-
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AlphaCoordinateFixation.leanJ_uniquely_calibrated_via_higher_derivative unclear?
unclearRelation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.
K-band luminosity density serves as a reliable proxy for the underlying mass density
What do these tags mean?
- matches
- The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
- supports
- The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
- extends
- The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
- uses
- The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
- contradicts
- The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
- unclear
- Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
G. F. Smoot, C. L. Bennett, A. Kogut, E. L. Wright, J. Aymon, N. W. Boggess, E. S. Cheng, G. de Am- ici, S. Gulkis, M. G. Hauser, G. Hinshaw, P. D. Jack- son, M. Janssen, E. Kaita, T. Kelsall, P. Keegstra, C. Lineweaver, K. Loewenstein, P. Lubin, J. Mather, S. S. Meyer, S. H. Moseley, T. Murdock, L. Rokke, R. F. Silverberg, L. Tenorio, R. Weiss, and D. T....
work page 1992
-
[2]
P. J. E. Peebles, The large-scale structure of the universe (1980)
work page 1980
-
[3]
J. R. Bond, L. Kofman, and D. Pogosyan, How filaments of galaxies are woven into the cosmic web, Nature (Lon- don) 380, 603 (1996), arXiv:astro-ph/9512141 [astro-ph]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996
-
[4]
M. Cautun, R. van de Weygaert, B. J. T. Jones, and C. S. Frenk, Evolution of the cosmic web, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 441, 2923 (2014), arXiv:1401.7866 [astro-ph.CO]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014
-
[5]
D. Gal´ arraga-Espinosa, C. Cadiou, C. Gouin, S. D. M. White, V. Springel, R. Pakmor, B. Hadzhiyska, S. Bose, F. Ferlito, L. Hernquist, R. Kannan, M. Barrera, A. Maria Delgado, and C. Hern´ andez-Aguayo, Evolution of cosmic filaments in the MTNG simulation, Astron. As- troph. 684, A63 (2024), arXiv:2309.08659 [astro-ph.CO]
-
[6]
W. Wang, P. Wang, H. Guo, X. Kang, N. I. Libeskind, D. Gal´ arraga-Espinosa, V. Springel, R. Kannan, L. Hern- quist, R. Pakmor, H.-R. Yu, S. Bose, Q. Guo, L. Yu, and C. Hern´ andez-Aguayo, The boundary of cosmic fil- aments, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 532, 4604 (2024), arXiv:2402.11678 [astro-ph.CO]
-
[7]
K. Kraljic, S. Arnouts, C. Pichon, C. Laigle, S. de la Torre, D. Vibert, C. Cadiou, Y. Dubois, M. Treyer, C. Schimd, S. Codis, V. de Lapparent, J. Devriendt, H. S. Hwang, D. Le Borgne, N. Malavasi, B. Mil- liard, M. Musso, D. Pogosyan, M. Alpaslan, J. Bland- Hawthorn, and A. H. Wright, Galaxy evolution in the metric of the cosmic web, Mon. Not. R. Astron....
-
[8]
COSMOS2015 photometric redshifts probe the impact of filaments on galaxy properties
C. Laigle, C. Pichon, S. Arnouts, H. J. McCracken, Y. Dubois, J. Devriendt, A. Slyz, D. Le Borgne, A. Benoit-L´ evy, H. S. Hwang, O. Ilbert, K. Kraljic, N. Malavasi, C. Park, and D. Vibert, COSMOS2015 photometric redshifts probe the impact of filaments on galaxy properties, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 474, 5437 (2018), arXiv:1702.08810 [astro-ph.GA]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
-
[9]
D. Gal´ arraga-Espinosa, M. Langer, and N. Aghanim, Rel- ative distribution of dark matter, gas, and stars around cosmic filaments in the illustristng simulation, Astron- omy & Astrophysics 661, A115 (2022). 10
work page 2022
-
[10]
H. Tanimura, N. Aghanim, V. Bonjean, N. Malavasi, and M. Douspis, Density and temperature of cosmic-web fila- ments on scales of tens of megaparsecs, Astron. Astroph. 637, A41 (2020), arXiv:1911.09706 [astro-ph.CO]
-
[11]
J. Kollmeier, S. F. Anderson, G. A. Blanc, M. R. Blan- ton, K. R. Covey, J. Crane, N. Drory, P. M. Frinchaboy, C. S. Froning, J. A. Johnson, J. P. Kneib, K. Kreckel, A. Merloni, E. W. Pellegrini, R. W. Pogge, S. V. Ramirez, H. W. Rix, C. Sayres, J. S´ anchez-Gallego, Y. Shen, A. Tkachenko, J. R. Trump, S. E. Tuttle, A. Weij- mans, G. Zasowski, B. Barbuy, ...
work page 2019
-
[12]
H. E. Luparello, E. F. Boero, M. Lares, A. G. S´ anchez, and D. G. Lambas, The cosmic shallows – i. interaction of cmb photons in extended galaxy haloes, Monthly No- tices of the Royal Astronomical Society 518, 5643–5652 (2022)
work page 2022
-
[13]
F. K. Hansen, E. F. Boero, H. E. Luparello, and D. Gar- cia Lambas, A possible common explanation for sev- eral cosmic microwave background (cmb) anomalies: A strong impact of nearby galaxies on observed large-scale cmb fluctuations, Astronomy & Astrophysics 675, L7 (2023)
work page 2023
- [14]
- [15]
- [16]
-
[17]
F. Toscano, F. K. Hansen, D. Garcia Lambas, H. Lu- parello, P. Fosalba, and E. Gazta˜ naga, Are CMB derived cosmological parameters affected by foregrounds associ- ated to nearby galaxies?, Physical Review D 111, 083528 (2025), arXiv:2410.24026 [astro-ph.CO]
-
[18]
http://tdc-www.harvard.edu/2mrs/
-
[19]
J. P. Huchra, L. M. Macri, K. L. Masters, T. H. Jarrett, P. Berlind, M. Calkins, A. C. Crook, R. Cutri, P. Er- dogdu, E. Falco, T. George, C. M. Hutcheson, O. La- hav, J. Mader, J. D. Mink, N. Martimbeau, S. Schneider, M. Skrutskie, S. Tokarz, and M. Westover, the 2Mass Redshift Survey -Description and Data Release, ApJS 199, 26 (2012), arXiv:arXiv:1108.0669v1
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012
-
[20]
The persistent cosmic web and its filamentary structure I: Theory and implementation
T. Sousbie, The persistent cosmic web and its filamentary structure - I. Theory and implementation, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 414, 350 (2011), arXiv:1009.4015
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011
-
[21]
The persistent cosmic web and its filamentary structure II: Illustrations
T. Sousbie, C. Pichon, and H. Kawahara, The persis- tent cosmic web and its filamentary structure - II. Il- lustrations, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 414, 384 (2011), arXiv:1009.4014
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011
-
[22]
Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters
Planck Collaboration, N. Aghanim, Y. Akrami, M. Ash- down, J. Aumont, C. Baccigalupi, M. Ballardini, A. J. Banday, R. B. Barreiro, N. Bartolo, S. Basak, R. Battye, K. Benabed, J. P. Bernard, M. Bersanelli, P. Bielewicz, J. J. Bock, J. R. Bond, J. Borrill, F. R. Bouchet, F. Boulanger, M. Bucher, C. Burigana, R. C. Butler, E. Calabrese, J. F. Cardoso, J. Ca...
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
-
[23]
Planck 2018 results. I. Overview and the cosmological legacy of Planck
Planck Collaboration, N. Aghanim, Y. Akrami, F. Ar- roja, M. Ashdown, J. Aumont, C. Baccigalupi, M. Ballar- dini, A. J. Banday, R. B. Barreiro, N. Bartolo, S. Basak, R. Battye, K. Benabed, J. P. Bernard, M. Bersanelli, P. Bielewicz, J. J. Bock, J. R. Bond, J. Borrill, F. R. Bouchet, F. Boulanger, M. Bucher, C. Burigana, R. C. Butler, E. Calabrese, J. F. C...
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
-
[24]
https://pla.esac.esa.int/#maps
-
[25]
Planck Collaboration, Y. Akrami, M. Ashdown, J. Au- mont, C. Baccigalupi, M. Ballardini, A. J. Banday, R. B. Barreiro, N. Bartolo, S. Basak, K. Benabed, M. Bersanelli, P. Bielewicz, J. R. Bond, J. Borrill, F. R. Bouchet, F. Boulanger, M. Bucher, C. Burig- ana, E. Calabrese, J. F. Cardoso, J. Carron, B. Cas- aponsa, A. Challinor, L. P. L. Colombo, C. Combe...
-
[26]
K. M. G´ orski, E. Hivon, A. J. Banday, B. D. Wan- delt, F. K. Hansen, M. Reinecke, and M. Bartelmann, HEALPix: A Framework for High-Resolution Discretiza- tion and Fast Analysis of Data Distributed on the Sphere, Astrophys. J. 622, 759 (2005), arXiv:astro-ph/0409513 [astro-ph]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005
-
[27]
https://healpix.sourceforge.io/
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.