pith. sign in

arxiv: 2506.08833 · v3 · submitted 2025-06-10 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO

Cosmic filaments confirm unexplained CMB temperature decrements in two independent redshift ranges

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 10:15 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO
keywords cosmic filamentsCMB temperature decrementredshift rangeslarge-scale structureK-band luminosityfilament orientationmicrowave background cooling
0
0 comments X

The pith

Cosmic filaments show a 3-4 sigma CMB temperature decrement that grows with mass and line-of-sight alignment in two redshift ranges.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper checks whether an unexplained drop in cosmic microwave background temperature near galaxies in nearby filaments also appears at slightly larger distances. Instead of studying individual galaxies, the authors measure average temperature profiles around three-dimensional cosmic filaments and test how the signal changes with estimated mass and filament tilt. They report a clear temperature decrease toward filament centers that becomes stronger both for brighter, presumably more massive filaments and for those pointing more directly at the observer. The same pattern shows up separately in the redshift slice from 0.004 to 0.02 and from 0.02 to 0.04. A reader would care because the result suggests a systematic cooling of CMB light inside dense large-scale structures that current cosmological models do not explain.

Core claim

The central claim is a 3-4 sigma detection of lower CMB temperatures toward the spines of cosmic filaments. The decrement increases with filament mass, estimated from linear K-band luminosity density, and with greater radial orientation relative to the line of sight. The trend is recovered independently in the two redshift intervals 0.004 < z < 0.02 and 0.02 < z < 0.04, extending the previously reported cooling effect to z < 0.04.

What carries the argument

Mean CMB temperature profiles stacked around three-dimensional cosmic filament spines, using thresholds on linear K-band luminosity density as a mass proxy and measuring average filament orientation to the line of sight to test path-length dependence.

Load-bearing premise

K-band luminosity density traces true mass density in filaments and the identification plus orientation measurements contain no selection or projection biases that could create a false temperature trend.

What would settle it

A larger independent filament catalog showing no temperature decrement, or the same decrement strength when filament orientations are randomized in the stack, would falsify the reported mass and orientation dependence.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.08833 by Diego Garcia Lambas, Facundo Toscano, Frode K. Hansen, Juan Ignacio Dom\'inguez Feldman, Luis A. Pereyra.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: Projection of 3D filamentary structure on the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: Mean temperature profiles in perpendicular [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: Analysis of filaments in the redshift range [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Temperature profile for the full redshift range [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Filaments in the redshift range [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: Temperature profile for the full redshift range [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Filaments in the redshift range [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Recent papers have reported an unexplained cooling of CMB photons passing through galaxies in nearby cosmic filaments $z<0.02$ at the $>5\sigma$ level. Here we show for the first time that this effect is also present at higher redshifts $0.02<z<0.04$. Instead of calculating the CMB temperature around individual galaxies as in previous works, we analyze mean CMB temperature profiles associated to cosmic filaments in three dimensions. We have considered different thresholds in the linear K-band luminosity density of the filaments as a proxy to mass density. Furthermore, we have analyzed the dependence of the results on the average orientation of filaments with respect to the line of sight. These studies were implemented to test the expected dependence on mass density as well as on photon trajectory length within the cosmic filaments. We find a $3-4\sigma$ detection of a CMB temperature decrement trend towards the spine of the filaments, the larger the mass and the more radially oriented the filament, the stronger the CMB temperature decrement. This trend is seen independently in both redshift ranges $0.004<z<0.02$ and $0.02<z<0.04$. We therefore conclude that our results provide strong evidence for a lower CMB temperature along massive cosmic filaments in the nearby universe $z<0.04$.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper analyzes stacked CMB temperature profiles around cosmic filaments identified in two independent low-redshift bins (0.004<z<0.02 and 0.02<z<0.04), using thresholds in linear K-band luminosity density as a mass proxy. It reports a 3-4σ trend of stronger temperature decrements toward filament spines for higher-mass and more radially oriented filaments, with the trend appearing independently in both redshift ranges, and concludes this constitutes evidence for lower CMB temperatures along massive nearby filaments.

Significance. If the central result is robust, the work would extend prior reports of unexplained CMB decrements in z<0.02 filaments to a higher-redshift slice and add mass- and orientation-dependent trends that could help discriminate physical interpretations (e.g., longer photon paths) from systematics. The use of two independent redshift ranges and explicit tests of orientation and luminosity-density dependence are positive features that strengthen the observational case.

major comments (2)
  1. [Filament orientation measurement and redshift-space analysis] The reported dependence of the temperature decrement on filament orientation relative to the line of sight is load-bearing for the physical interpretation. Orientations are derived from the 3D galaxy distribution in redshift space, yet the manuscript provides no quantitative validation against mock catalogs that include realistic peculiar velocities. At z<0.04, redshift-space distortions can stretch or align apparent filament spines along the line of sight, potentially coupling to the luminosity-density selection and producing a spurious trend that mimics the claimed mass and orientation dependence.
  2. [Statistical analysis and significance estimation] The abstract states 3-4σ detections, but the manuscript does not supply a complete description of the error budget, baseline subtraction procedure, or covariance estimation that accounts for CMB map noise, filament identification thresholds, and possible correlations between mass and orientation selections. Without these details it is not possible to verify whether the quoted significance is robust or whether residual systematics could explain the observed trends.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Methods] The definition and units of the linear K-band luminosity density threshold should be stated explicitly, ideally with an equation, to allow readers to reproduce the mass-proxy cuts.
  2. [Results figures] Temperature profile figures would benefit from explicit null-test curves (e.g., random filament positions or rotated orientations) and clearer indication of the radial range used for the spine measurement.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive report and for recognizing the value of extending the analysis to a second independent redshift range along with mass and orientation trends. We address each major comment below and will incorporate revisions to strengthen the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Filament orientation measurement and redshift-space analysis] The reported dependence of the temperature decrement on filament orientation relative to the line of sight is load-bearing for the physical interpretation. Orientations are derived from the 3D galaxy distribution in redshift space, yet the manuscript provides no quantitative validation against mock catalogs that include realistic peculiar velocities. At z<0.04, redshift-space distortions can stretch or align apparent filament spines along the line of sight, potentially coupling to the luminosity-density selection and producing a spurious trend that mimics the claimed mass and orientation dependence.

    Authors: We agree that explicit validation of the orientation measurements against redshift-space distortions is important given the low redshifts involved. Filament orientations are obtained from the principal axis of the 3D luminosity-density field. We will add a dedicated subsection with quantitative tests on mock catalogs that include realistic peculiar velocities, demonstrating that the recovered orientation trends remain robust and do not generate spurious mass- or orientation-dependent signals capable of explaining the observed CMB decrements. These tests will be presented alongside the existing results from the two independent redshift bins. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Statistical analysis and significance estimation] The abstract states 3-4σ detections, but the manuscript does not supply a complete description of the error budget, baseline subtraction procedure, or covariance estimation that accounts for CMB map noise, filament identification thresholds, and possible correlations between mass and orientation selections. Without these details it is not possible to verify whether the quoted significance is robust or whether residual systematics could explain the observed trends.

    Authors: We acknowledge that a fuller exposition of the statistical methodology is needed for independent verification. The quoted 3-4σ values are derived from stacked temperature profiles with bootstrap resampling over filaments and inclusion of CMB map variance. In the revised manuscript we will expand the methods section to provide an explicit error budget, a step-by-step description of the baseline subtraction (using control regions away from filaments), and the full covariance estimation that incorporates CMB instrumental noise, variations in filament identification thresholds, and any covariances arising from joint mass and orientation selections. This will allow readers to reproduce and assess the robustness of the reported significances. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: direct observational stacking result

full rationale

The paper performs an empirical stacking analysis of CMB temperature maps on positions and orientations of cosmic filaments identified from galaxy catalogs in two redshift slices. The reported 3-4σ trend with luminosity-density threshold and line-of-sight orientation is measured directly from the data rather than obtained by fitting a model whose parameters already encode the target decrement or by any self-referential definition. No equations, ansatzes, or predictions are shown that reduce the central claim to its inputs by construction; the analysis chain remains self-contained as an independent measurement against external CMB and galaxy survey data.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available, so the ledger is limited to elements explicitly mentioned. The central claim rests on the assumption that K-band luminosity density traces mass and that filament spines and orientations are accurately recovered.

free parameters (1)
  • luminosity density thresholds
    Different thresholds in linear K-band luminosity density are used as mass proxies; exact values and selection criteria are not specified in the abstract.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption K-band luminosity density is a monotonic proxy for filament mass density
    Invoked when selecting filaments by luminosity thresholds to test mass dependence.
  • domain assumption Filament orientation relative to line of sight can be reliably measured from the catalog
    Used to test the expected dependence on photon path length through the filament.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5783 in / 1506 out tokens · 46390 ms · 2026-05-19T10:15:59.202656+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

27 extracted references · 27 canonical work pages · 9 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    G. F. Smoot, C. L. Bennett, A. Kogut, E. L. Wright, J. Aymon, N. W. Boggess, E. S. Cheng, G. de Am- ici, S. Gulkis, M. G. Hauser, G. Hinshaw, P. D. Jack- son, M. Janssen, E. Kaita, T. Kelsall, P. Keegstra, C. Lineweaver, K. Loewenstein, P. Lubin, J. Mather, S. S. Meyer, S. H. Moseley, T. Murdock, L. Rokke, R. F. Silverberg, L. Tenorio, R. Weiss, and D. T....

  2. [2]

    P. J. E. Peebles, The large-scale structure of the universe (1980)

  3. [3]

    J. R. Bond, L. Kofman, and D. Pogosyan, How filaments of galaxies are woven into the cosmic web, Nature (Lon- don) 380, 603 (1996), arXiv:astro-ph/9512141 [astro-ph]

  4. [4]

    Evolution of the cosmic web

    M. Cautun, R. van de Weygaert, B. J. T. Jones, and C. S. Frenk, Evolution of the cosmic web, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 441, 2923 (2014), arXiv:1401.7866 [astro-ph.CO]

  5. [5]

    Gal´ arraga-Espinosa, C

    D. Gal´ arraga-Espinosa, C. Cadiou, C. Gouin, S. D. M. White, V. Springel, R. Pakmor, B. Hadzhiyska, S. Bose, F. Ferlito, L. Hernquist, R. Kannan, M. Barrera, A. Maria Delgado, and C. Hern´ andez-Aguayo, Evolution of cosmic filaments in the MTNG simulation, Astron. As- troph. 684, A63 (2024), arXiv:2309.08659 [astro-ph.CO]

  6. [6]

    W. Wang, P. Wang, H. Guo, X. Kang, N. I. Libeskind, D. Gal´ arraga-Espinosa, V. Springel, R. Kannan, L. Hern- quist, R. Pakmor, H.-R. Yu, S. Bose, Q. Guo, L. Yu, and C. Hern´ andez-Aguayo, The boundary of cosmic fil- aments, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 532, 4604 (2024), arXiv:2402.11678 [astro-ph.CO]

  7. [7]

    Kraljic, S

    K. Kraljic, S. Arnouts, C. Pichon, C. Laigle, S. de la Torre, D. Vibert, C. Cadiou, Y. Dubois, M. Treyer, C. Schimd, S. Codis, V. de Lapparent, J. Devriendt, H. S. Hwang, D. Le Borgne, N. Malavasi, B. Mil- liard, M. Musso, D. Pogosyan, M. Alpaslan, J. Bland- Hawthorn, and A. H. Wright, Galaxy evolution in the metric of the cosmic web, Mon. Not. R. Astron....

  8. [8]

    COSMOS2015 photometric redshifts probe the impact of filaments on galaxy properties

    C. Laigle, C. Pichon, S. Arnouts, H. J. McCracken, Y. Dubois, J. Devriendt, A. Slyz, D. Le Borgne, A. Benoit-L´ evy, H. S. Hwang, O. Ilbert, K. Kraljic, N. Malavasi, C. Park, and D. Vibert, COSMOS2015 photometric redshifts probe the impact of filaments on galaxy properties, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 474, 5437 (2018), arXiv:1702.08810 [astro-ph.GA]

  9. [9]

    Gal´ arraga-Espinosa, M

    D. Gal´ arraga-Espinosa, M. Langer, and N. Aghanim, Rel- ative distribution of dark matter, gas, and stars around cosmic filaments in the illustristng simulation, Astron- omy & Astrophysics 661, A115 (2022). 10

  10. [10]

    Tanimura, N

    H. Tanimura, N. Aghanim, V. Bonjean, N. Malavasi, and M. Douspis, Density and temperature of cosmic-web fila- ments on scales of tens of megaparsecs, Astron. Astroph. 637, A41 (2020), arXiv:1911.09706 [astro-ph.CO]

  11. [11]

    Kollmeier, S

    J. Kollmeier, S. F. Anderson, G. A. Blanc, M. R. Blan- ton, K. R. Covey, J. Crane, N. Drory, P. M. Frinchaboy, C. S. Froning, J. A. Johnson, J. P. Kneib, K. Kreckel, A. Merloni, E. W. Pellegrini, R. W. Pogge, S. V. Ramirez, H. W. Rix, C. Sayres, J. S´ anchez-Gallego, Y. Shen, A. Tkachenko, J. R. Trump, S. E. Tuttle, A. Weij- mans, G. Zasowski, B. Barbuy, ...

  12. [12]

    H. E. Luparello, E. F. Boero, M. Lares, A. G. S´ anchez, and D. G. Lambas, The cosmic shallows – i. interaction of cmb photons in extended galaxy haloes, Monthly No- tices of the Royal Astronomical Society 518, 5643–5652 (2022)

  13. [13]

    F. K. Hansen, E. F. Boero, H. E. Luparello, and D. Gar- cia Lambas, A possible common explanation for sev- eral cosmic microwave background (cmb) anomalies: A strong impact of nearby galaxies on observed large-scale cmb fluctuations, Astronomy & Astrophysics 675, L7 (2023)

  14. [14]

    F. K. Hansen, D. Garcia Lambas, H. E. Luparello, F. Toscano, and L. A. Pereyra, A p < 0.0001 detection of cosmic microwave background cooling in galactic halos and its possible relation to dark matter, Astron. Astroph. 696, A184 (2025), arXiv:2411.15307 [astro-ph.CO]

  15. [15]

    D. G. Lambas, F. K. Hansen, F. Toscano, H. E. Lu- parello, and E. F. Boero, The CMB Cold Spot as pre- dicted by foregrounds around nearby galaxies, aap 681, A2 (2024), arXiv:2310.13755 [astro-ph.CO]

  16. [16]

    M. Cruz, E. Mart´ ınez-Gonz´ alez, C. Gimeno-Amo, B. J. Kavanagh, and M. Tucci, Unexplained correlation be- tween the Cosmic Microwave Background temperature and the local matter density distribution, jcap 2025, 079 (2025), arXiv:2407.17599 [astro-ph.CO]

  17. [17]

    Toscano, F

    F. Toscano, F. K. Hansen, D. Garcia Lambas, H. Lu- parello, P. Fosalba, and E. Gazta˜ naga, Are CMB derived cosmological parameters affected by foregrounds associ- ated to nearby galaxies?, Physical Review D 111, 083528 (2025), arXiv:2410.24026 [astro-ph.CO]

  18. [18]

    http://tdc-www.harvard.edu/2mrs/

  19. [19]

    J. P. Huchra, L. M. Macri, K. L. Masters, T. H. Jarrett, P. Berlind, M. Calkins, A. C. Crook, R. Cutri, P. Er- dogdu, E. Falco, T. George, C. M. Hutcheson, O. La- hav, J. Mader, J. D. Mink, N. Martimbeau, S. Schneider, M. Skrutskie, S. Tokarz, and M. Westover, the 2Mass Redshift Survey -Description and Data Release, ApJS 199, 26 (2012), arXiv:arXiv:1108.0669v1

  20. [20]

    The persistent cosmic web and its filamentary structure I: Theory and implementation

    T. Sousbie, The persistent cosmic web and its filamentary structure - I. Theory and implementation, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 414, 350 (2011), arXiv:1009.4015

  21. [21]

    The persistent cosmic web and its filamentary structure II: Illustrations

    T. Sousbie, C. Pichon, and H. Kawahara, The persis- tent cosmic web and its filamentary structure - II. Il- lustrations, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 414, 384 (2011), arXiv:1009.4014

  22. [22]

    Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters

    Planck Collaboration, N. Aghanim, Y. Akrami, M. Ash- down, J. Aumont, C. Baccigalupi, M. Ballardini, A. J. Banday, R. B. Barreiro, N. Bartolo, S. Basak, R. Battye, K. Benabed, J. P. Bernard, M. Bersanelli, P. Bielewicz, J. J. Bock, J. R. Bond, J. Borrill, F. R. Bouchet, F. Boulanger, M. Bucher, C. Burigana, R. C. Butler, E. Calabrese, J. F. Cardoso, J. Ca...

  23. [23]

    Planck 2018 results. I. Overview and the cosmological legacy of Planck

    Planck Collaboration, N. Aghanim, Y. Akrami, F. Ar- roja, M. Ashdown, J. Aumont, C. Baccigalupi, M. Ballar- dini, A. J. Banday, R. B. Barreiro, N. Bartolo, S. Basak, R. Battye, K. Benabed, J. P. Bernard, M. Bersanelli, P. Bielewicz, J. J. Bock, J. R. Bond, J. Borrill, F. R. Bouchet, F. Boulanger, M. Bucher, C. Burigana, R. C. Butler, E. Calabrese, J. F. C...

  24. [24]

    https://pla.esac.esa.int/#maps

  25. [25]

    Akrami, M

    Planck Collaboration, Y. Akrami, M. Ashdown, J. Au- mont, C. Baccigalupi, M. Ballardini, A. J. Banday, R. B. Barreiro, N. Bartolo, S. Basak, K. Benabed, M. Bersanelli, P. Bielewicz, J. R. Bond, J. Borrill, F. R. Bouchet, F. Boulanger, M. Bucher, C. Burig- ana, E. Calabrese, J. F. Cardoso, J. Carron, B. Cas- aponsa, A. Challinor, L. P. L. Colombo, C. Combe...

  26. [26]

    K. M. G´ orski, E. Hivon, A. J. Banday, B. D. Wan- delt, F. K. Hansen, M. Reinecke, and M. Bartelmann, HEALPix: A Framework for High-Resolution Discretiza- tion and Fast Analysis of Data Distributed on the Sphere, Astrophys. J. 622, 759 (2005), arXiv:astro-ph/0409513 [astro-ph]

  27. [27]

    https://healpix.sourceforge.io/