Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.
Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links
Paper Citation Record · LEDGER
Do Concept Replacement Techniques Really Erase Unacceptable Concepts?
As of 3 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 0 of 0 outbound references and 1 inbound Pith citation observation for arXiv:2506.08991.
A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.
Coverage vector
One-hop event checks from named stored sources.
Source: scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache, observed 2026-08-03T06:30:56.289259+00:00
Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.
Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-08-02T21:46:43.029378Z
A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.
Source: cited_works
Reference resolution
0 of 0 outbound references displayed
- verified exact0
- verified fuzzy0
- unresolved0
- parse uncertain0
- malformed identifier0
- metadata mismatch0
External citation measurements
No source-named external measurement is stored.
Outbound references
No outbound reference observations are available for this paper version.
Pith citing papers
Observation 4c9d56b2-d7b3-4bd2-9bc9-0b86e5aebeb6 · inbound
ReVision : A Post-Hoc, Vision-Based Technique for Replacing Unacceptable Concepts in Image Generation Pipeline cites this paper.
ReVision : A Post-Hoc, Vision-Based Technique for Replacing Unacceptable Concepts in Image Generation Pipeline Do Concept Replacement Techniques Really Erase Unacceptable Concepts?
Reference 6
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T21:46:43.029378Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.