Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 98 references

A Plasma Torus Around a Young Low-Mass Star

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Time-series H-alpha spectroscopy of the 3.93-hour rotator TIC 141146667 shows sinusoidal emission at two to four times the star's equatorial velocity, direct evidence for cool plasma clumps magnetically locked in corotation around a…

desk verdict The first spectroscopic evidence for corotating circumstellar plasma around a complex periodic variable—real, novel, and worth refereeing, though the derived clump radii carry more circularity than the paper lets on. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.09116 v1 pith:4A76YANN submitted 2025-06-10 astro-ph.SR

Luke G. Bouma , Moira M. Jardine This is my paper
classification astro-ph.SR
keywords complexperiodicvariablesMdwarfsplasmatoruscorotatingclumpsH-alphaspectroscopystellarmagneticfieldsTIC141146667centrifugalmagnetosphere
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that at least one complex periodic variable (CPV) genuinely hosts corotating circumstellar material, not just starspots. Five hours of Keck/HIRES spectra of TIC 141146667 show H-alpha emission that swings sinusoidally in velocity at 2.07, 2.88, and 3.88 times the stellar equatorial velocity, with a period matching the 3.930-hour photometric rotation. Because material at those distances would take 1-3 days to orbit under gravity alone, the emitting clumps must be locked to the star's magnetic field. This would be the first spectroscopic detection of circumstellar plasma around a CPV, and it supports the idea that many young, rapidly rotating M dwarfs sustain warped tori of cool plasma.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing identity is the corotation relation connecting observed velocity semi-amplitude to cylindrical radius: v = Ω R sin i, so a sinusoidal H-alpha velocity curve of semi-amplitude K maps to a clump location R = K / (Ω sin i). The central object is the warped plasma torus, a centrifugally supported accumulation of plasma in a misaligned dipole magnetosphere whose effective potential (gravitational plus centrifugal) has local minima outside the Keplerian corotation radius; those minima lie 180 degrees apart where the rotational and magnetic planes intersect. The machinery also includes the measured velocity dispersion of the H-alpha clumps (~0.24 v_eq), which rules out long arcs or radial spokes and requires blob-like emitting regions with dimensions of order 0.5 R*.

What would settle it

A decisive test would be to re-observe TIC 141146667 spectroscopically across several years: if the H-alpha clumps were on Keplerian orbits, their orbital phase would drift relative to the 3.930-hour stellar rotation period, whereas strict corotation requires the sinusoidal H-alpha pattern to stay locked to the photometric period with no detectable drift. A second direct check is measuring the stellar inclination via spectropolarimetry or asteroseismology; since the radius estimate for the inner clump scales as 1/sin i, a measured inclination near 60 degrees would push the inferred clump radii outward and change the comparison with the Keplerian corotation radius.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The discovery is direct evidence for cool (≲$10^{4}$ K) plasma clumps trapped in corotation around a CPV. The H-$\alpha$ emission is double-peaked and 180 degrees apart in phase, with velocity semi-amplitudes that map, under rigid corotation, to mean distances of 2.07 R*, 2.88 R*, and 3.88 R* from the star's rotation axis. The innermost clump's orbital period is consistent with the photometric period to within two minutes, while the Keplerian orbital period at 2 R* would be roughly 1-3 days, so the clumps cannot be on free Keplerian orbits; they must be magnetically confined. The authors interpret this as a warped plasma torus with antipodal density enhancements, analogous to the tori around rapidly rotating magnetic B stars and to prominence systems on active cool stars, and they note that the transits of the inner clumps overlap but do not fully explain the complex TESS photometric dips.

Load-bearing premise

The interpretation assumes the system is viewed nearly edge-on and that the H-alpha emission comes from discrete, rigidly corotating clumps whose measured velocity spread maps linearly to their spatial size; if the inclination is significantly below 90 degrees or the emission traces a distributed flow, the quoted radii, the antipodal geometry, and the precise comparison with the corotation radius would shift, although the existence of magnetically controlled circumstellar plasma would remain.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • At least one CPV is now known to have corotating circumstellar plasma, so the starspot-only explanation cannot account for the entire class.
  • The clumps orbit at 2-4 R* while Keplerian orbits at those radii take 1-3 days, so the plasma must be magnetically forced to corotate with the star.
  • The spectroscopic transits of the inner H-alpha clump cover roughly 22% of each cycle and coincide only partially with the TESS photometric dip, implying additional opacity sources or spatially distinct structures contribute to the photometric variability.
  • Correcting the observed CPV fraction for transit geometry suggests that ≳10% of young M dwarfs may host similar centrifugal magnetospheres during their first ~100 Myr.
  • The clump gas mass is estimated at ≈2×10^17 g with dust mass between 10^15 and 10^17 g, setting concrete scales for future models of the composition and origin of the material.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If corotating tori are common around young M dwarfs, their sharp, periodic optical dips could be confused with, or contaminate, searches for short-period rocky exoplanet transits in TESS data; the 3.93-hour period and repeated features of TIC 141146667 illustrate a false-positive population that time-series spectroscopy can distinguish.
  • The geometric correction implies that >10% of young, rapidly rotating M dwarfs could host similar structures; a targeted volume-limited TESS survey of young moving groups paired with H-alpha follow-up of a handful of CPVs would test this prediction directly.
  • The paper's plasma clumps sit at the cool end of a continuum that includes solar prominences and the tori of rapidly rotating B stars; if dust can condense inside these clumps, the structures could serve as a formation site for small solid bodies around low-mass stars.
  • The derived magnetic-field lower bound of ≈1 G at the clump sites is easily exceeded by typical M-dwarf surface fields, so the main uncertainty is not field strength but the topology; future spectropolarimetry that maps the field geometry of a CPV would discriminate between dipole and multipolar confinement.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper presents time-series Keck/HIRES spectroscopy and TESS photometry of the young M-dwarf complex periodic variable TIC 141146667 (P=3.93 hr). The Hα spectra show emission components extending to roughly two to four times the equatorial velocity, with apparent sinusoidal phase modulation over the five-hour run. The authors argue that the high observed velocities and the 3.93 hr period rule out a photospheric origin and a Keplerian orbit at the inferred radii, implying magnetically forced corotation of cool circumstellar plasma at roughly 2-4 R*. They quantify the clump properties with a phenomenological multi-Gaussian model, derive order-of-magnitude plasma densities, masses, and dust mass limits, and connect the system to warped plasma tori around magnetic stars. The central claim is that this is the first direct spectroscopic evidence that CPVs can host corotating circumstellar material rather than being purely starspot phenomena.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the paper breaks an important degeneracy in the CPV literature: at least some complex periodic variables have corotating circumstellar plasma, not merely complex starspot distributions. The high-velocity Hα emission is visually striking and the order-of-magnitude physical estimates (n_H~1e11 cm^-3, M_gas~1e17 g, B>1 G) provide a useful starting point. The paper is also commendably candid about several weaknesses: the single-epoch nature of the spectroscopy, the factor-of-several decay of the Hα emissivity, the instability of the outer component, and the model-dependence of the fits. The main limitations are that the quantitative radii and the claimed period agreement are partly conditioned on priors informed by the same data, and the radii assume an edge-on viewing geometry that is only weakly constrained. These issues affect the detailed geometry and the exact corotation radius comparison, but they do not undermine the robust visual detection of high-velocity magnetically controlled circumstellar hydrogen.

major comments (4)
  1. [Appendix B; Table 1; Section 3] The reported orbital periods and semi-amplitudes (P0=3.92±0.03 hr, K0/veq=2.07±0.04; P1=3.92±0.06 hr, K1/veq=2.88±0.10; P2=3.88±0.20 hr, K2/veq=3.88±0.25) are not independent tests of the photometric period and phase, because the multi-Gaussian component means were fit with priors centered on sinusoids at the photometric period and phase, with amplitudes K_inner≈2.5 veq and K_outer≈3.9 veq, values that the text states were 'suggested by visual inspection' of the same data. This circularity does not invalidate the visual detection of high-velocity Hα emission, but it means the quoted period agreement and the derived radii in Table 1 and Section 3 are model-dependent. The authors should either re-fit with uninformative priors to demonstrate robustness or explicitly label the reported values as estimates obtained under priors derived from the same dataset.
  2. [Appendix A; Table 1; Section 3] The orbital radii a0=2.07 R*, a1=2.88 R*, and a2=3.88 R* in Table 1 and Section 3 assume sin i=1, whereas Appendix A gives only a 2σ lower limit of i>63°. Since the observed velocity semi-amplitude scales as (r/R*) sin i, the true radii are larger by up to roughly 12% and should be quoted with the inclination dependence made explicit. The corotation conclusion survives this shift because even the smallest inferred radius remains above the Keplerian corotation radius Rc=1.82 R*, but the stated radii are lower limits under the edge-on assumption rather than direct measurements.
  3. [Appendix B; Section 4.2] The outer component, which is a key element of the antipodal-clump geometry, is acknowledged in Appendix B to be 'inconsistent with the idea of a stable clump of material,' with a poorly constrained period (P2=3.88±0.20 hr) and detection over only part of the cycle. Section 4.2 nevertheless uses two clumps separated by 180° in phase as evidence for a warped torus. The warped-torus interpretation should be explicitly conditioned on the assumption that the outer component is a coherent, long-lived structure; if it is instead transient or a distributed flow, the detailed geometry changes, although the existence of magnetically controlled plasma would remain.
  4. [Section 4.1; Appendix B] The claim that radial spokes or azimuthally extended arcs are 'ruled out' by the approximately 30 km/s Hα velocity dispersion is stronger than the data support. The argument in Appendix B assumes that the velocity width is well sampled over the full cycle, but the authors note greater uncertainty at mid-transit and the dataset shows large non-periodic emissivity variations and a decaying outer component. With a single five-hour sequence, the quoted widths may not sample the full range of possible geometries. I recommend softening 'ruled out' to 'inconsistent with the simplest arc/spoke geometries' unless additional epochs are analyzed.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Appendix B] The statement that 'a table of the fitted means, amplitudes, and standard deviations for each component is available upon request' should be replaced by a machine-readable supplementary table, since the subsequent orbit fits depend on these fitted values.
  2. [Figure 3; Appendix B] The notation f_t and f_λ is used in the figures and text without definition; please define these quantities in the caption or in the text near the first use.
  3. [References] The reference list contains a duplicate entry for Virtanen et al. (2020); one copy should be removed.
  4. [Table 1] The quoted veq sin i = 138±8 km/s exceeds veq = 130±4 km/s; although the difference is within the combined uncertainties, a sentence discussing the consistency of these values, or the systematic uncertainties in R* or vsini, would be helpful.
  5. [Abstract; Section 4.5] The statement that roughly 10% of M dwarfs may host similar structures is an extrapolation from a single object and an assumed geometric correction; the paper should state more explicitly that this is a rough estimate contingent on the CPV occurrence rate and on the assumption that the tori are present in all CPVs.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant load-bearing circularity: the corotating-plasma detection is direct and externally checked; only the quantitative radii inherit visually chosen priors, and the paper discloses this.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Appendix B (Detailed Behavior of Hα), feeding Table 1 a0/a1/a2 and Section 3 radii]
    "We assumed that the 'inner' (K_inner≈2.5v_eq) clump would be well-fit by a sum of two gaussians because it is visually double-peaked in the raw data from φ=0.15-0.35 and φ=0.65-0.85 (Figure 3b). ... This prior on the means mitigates multimodality in the likelihood by requiring the mean velocity of each component to be within a one or two v_eq of the time-variable sinusoid suggested by visual inspection."

    The quantitative 'orbital radii' (Table 1: a0=2.07, a1=2.88, a2=3.88 R*) are converted from fitted semi-amplitudes (K0/veq=2.07, K1/veq=2.88, K2/veq=3.88) obtained under priors whose guiding sinusoids (K_inner≈2.5, K_outer≈3.9 veq) were chosen by visual inspection of the same spectra. The outer K2 reproduces its prior center (3.88 vs 3.9); the inner values fall inside the prior windows. The priors are wide uniform windows, and the inner fitted values sit roughly 4σ from the prior centers, so nothing is statistically forced. The central claim—sinusoidal Hα at 2-4 veq that cannot be photospheric (exceeds veq sin i) or Keplerian (required radii lie inside the star)—is directly visible in Figure 3b and does not depend on the fitted radii.

full rationale

The paper's load-bearing chain is data-driven, not definitional. High-velocity Hα emission (semi-amplitudes 2.07-3.88 veq) is directly visible in the 5-hour HIRES time series (Figure 3b) without any model fit; it exceeds the maximum photospheric Doppler shift veq sin i = 138 km/s, so it is circumstellar. The sinusoidal phase structure and the period check (P0=3.92±0.03 hr vs photometric 3.930±0.001 hr) tie the material to the stellar rotation; a Keplerian interpretation fails because the observed velocities would require orbits at roughly 0.4-1.5 R*, inside or at the stellar surface. The warped-torus interpretation is checked against external work (Townsend & Owocki 2005; Townsend 2008), which the paper explicitly tests and finds partially deficient (two predicted W-eclipses; unequal clump distances). Self-citations (Bouma et al. 2024) provide the CPV catalog, SED radii, and occurrence statistics, but none carries the spectroscopic detection. The only prior-informed quantity is the radial scale: Appendix B's orbit-fit priors are anchored to visual estimates (K_inner≈2.5, K_outer≈3.9 veq) from the same data, and the quoted radii inherit this, which the paper discloses ('suggested by visual inspection'; 'the model fits noise, not signal'). The paper also flags the factor-of-seven emissivity decay, the outer clump's instability, and the weak inclination constraint (i>63° at 2σ). These affect clump lifetime, geometry, and precise radii, not the existence of corotating cool plasma. Verdict: no load-bearing circularity; score 2 reflects the prior-informed radial scale only.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central quantitative output, the clump orbital radii, is derived from Gaussian-fit velocity semi-amplitudes whose priors are centered on values chosen by visual inspection of the same data, making the radii fitted rather than first-principles. The physical interpretation then leans on the warped-torus model of Townsend & Owocki (2005), on an order-of-magnitude recombination calculation, and on the assumption of near-edge-on viewing. No new particles or forces are introduced; the 'plasma torus' is a known structure type applied to a new star.

free parameters (4)
  • K0/v_eq (inner clump 0 Halpha velocity semi-amplitude) = 2.07 ± 0.04
    Fitted from Gaussian decomposition of Halpha spectra; used to derive clump orbital radius a0=2.07 R* in Table 1. Prior centered at 2.5 v_eq from visual inspection.
  • K1/v_eq (inner clump 1 Halpha velocity semi-amplitude) = 2.88 ± 0.10
    Fitted from Gaussian decomposition; used for a1=2.88 R*.
  • K2/v_eq (outer clump Halpha velocity semi-amplitude) = 3.88 ± 0.25
    Fitted from a single Gaussian; used for a2=3.88 R*. Detection only over half the cycle; period ambiguous.
  • Halpha velocity dispersion sigma_i/v_eq = about 0.24
    Used to infer clump radial extent about 0.5 R* and to rule out arc/spoke geometries.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The warped-torus model of Townsend & Owocki (2005) for centrifugally supported magnetospheres applies to cool M dwarfs with strong multipolar fields.
    Used in Section 4.2 to interpret the two antipodal clumps and W-shaped photometric dips as expected from a tilted dipole; the paper itself notes discrepancies (two W-dips predicted, unequal clump distances) that would require non-dipolar fields.
  • domain assumption The Halpha emission is dominated by case B recombination in optically thin, uniform-density plasma (scattering neglected).
    Appendix C, Equations C1/C2; used to estimate n_H about 10^11 cm^-3 and M_gas about 2x10^17 g. The authors call this an order-of-magnitude estimate.
  • ad hoc to paper Clump orbital radii are computed assuming sin i about 1 (edge-on viewing).
    Table 1 derives a0, a1, a2 from K/v_eq with no inclination factor; inclination only constrained to i>63 degrees at 2 sigma (Appendix A), so radii could be up to about 12% larger.
  • domain assumption The Halpha line width maps linearly to spatial extent under rigid corotation (sigma = Omega*r/2).
    Appendix B, physical dimensions of emitting region; used to infer clump size about 0.5 R* and rule out arcs/spokes.
  • domain assumption Stellar parameters (M=0.22±0.02 Msun, R=0.42±0.02 Rsun, age 35-150 Myr) from SED and isochrone fitting are correct.
    These set the Keplerian corotation radius Rc=1.82 R* against which the clump radii are compared.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A Plasma Torus Around a Young Low-Mass Star." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/4A76YANN

@misc{pith2026250609116,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A Plasma Torus Around a Young Low-Mass Star},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/4A76YANN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.09116}
}
abstract

A small fraction of red dwarfs younger than 100 million years show structured, periodic optical light curves suggestive of transiting opaque material that corotates with the star. However, the composition, origin, and even the existence of this material are uncertain. The main alternative hypothesis is that these complex periodic variables (CPVs) are explained by complex distributions of bright or dark regions on the stellar surfaces. Here, we present time-series spectroscopy and photometry of a rapidly-rotating ($P$=3.9 hr) CPV, TIC 141146667. The spectra show sinusoidal time-varying H$\alpha$ emission at twice to four times the star's equatorial velocity, providing direct evidence for cool ($\lesssim$10$^4$ K) plasma clumps trapped in corotation around a CPV. These data support the idea that young, rapidly-rotating M dwarfs can sustain warped tori of cool plasma, similar to other rapidly-rotating magnetic stars. Outstanding questions include whether dust clumps in these plasma tori explain CPV light curves, and whether the tori originate from the star or are fed by external sources. Rough estimates suggest $\gtrsim$10% of M dwarfs host similar structures during their early lives.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.09116 by the authors.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Photometric evolution of TIC 141146667 around the Keck/HIRES observation (green bar). a, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Spectral energy distribution of broadband photometric magnitudes (filled cyan circles) plotted over the best-fit BT-Settl stellar atmosphere model (Allard et al. 2012) and the associated photometric predictions (empty purple diamonds). This plot was made from an adaptation of astroARIADNE (Vines & Jenkins 2022). The photometry extends from the Gaia DR3 blue passband to WISE W3; the W4 passband (22 µm) did not yield … view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. TIC 141146667 age diagnostics. a, Dereddened Gaia DR3 color vs. absolute magnitude for TIC 141146667, USco (8 Myr), IC 2602 (40 Myr), the Pleiades (112 Myr) and stars within 100 pc. The location of TIC 141146667 in this diagram suggests an age of 30-150 Myr. b, A dearth of photospheric lithium for TIC 141146667 (yellow triangle denotes 2σ upper limit) yields a lower bound on the star’s age of ≳20 Myr. Comparison sta… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Time-variable fit to Hα line profiles. Left column: Raw spectrum at each epoch fλ minus the time-averaged spectrum f⟨t⟩ (as in Figure 3e). Underplotted sinusoids are not fits; they are meant to guide the eye. Middle columns: Model of emission from the inner clump (sum …
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: a, Orbits fit to mean radial velocities (RVs) extracted from Hα profile fits in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_7.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Sanderson et al. (2023) calculated the relevant cloud mass for this problem assuming a spherical dust clump of size r, and they found Mdust ≳ 2 · 1015 g τ 1  Qext 3 −1  r 0.1R⋆ R⋆ 0.4R⊙ 2  a 1µm  ρd 3gcm−3  . (D5) Three relevant objects for comparison includ…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

98 extracted references · 21 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Allard, F., Homeier, D., & Freytag, B. 2012, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 370, 2765, doi: 10.1098/rsta.2011.0269 Astropy Collaboration, Robitaille, T. P., Tollerud, E. J., et al. 2013, A&A, 558, A33, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A. M., Sip˝ocz, ...

    arXiv 2012

  2. [2]

    Bagenal, F., & Sullivan, J. D. 1981, J. Geophys. Res., 86, 8447, doi: 10.1029/JA086iA10p08447

    doi:10.1029/ja086ia10p08447 1981

  3. [4]

    T., et al

    Bellotti, S., Morin, J., Lehmann, L. T., et al. 2024, A&A, 686, A66, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202348043

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202348043 2024

  4. [5]

    D., Owocki, S

    Berry, I. D., Owocki, S. P., Shultz, M. E., & ud-Doula, A. 2022, MNRAS, 511, 4815, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac322

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac322 2022

  5. [6]

    2021, waqasbhatti/astrobase: astrobase v0.5.3, v0.5.3, Zenodo, Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.1011188

    Bhatti, W., Bouma, L., Joshua, et al. 2021, waqasbhatti/astrobase: astrobase v0.5.3, v0.5.3, Zenodo, Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.1011188

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.1011188 2021

  6. [7]

    F., Matzner, C

    Bildsten, L., Brown, E. F., Matzner, C. D., & Ushomirsky, G. 1997, ApJ, 482, 442, doi: 10.1086/304151

    work page doi:10.1086/304151 1997

  7. [8]

    J., West, A

    Bochanski, J. J., West, A. A., Hawley, S. L., & Covey, K. R. 2007, AJ, 133, 531, doi: 10.1086/510240

    doi:10.1086/510240 2007

  8. [9]

    G., Jayaraman, R., Rappaport, S., et al

    Bouma, L. G., Jayaraman, R., Rappaport, S., et al. 2024, AJ, 167, 38, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ad0c4c

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ad0c4c 2024

Show all 98 references
  1. [10]

    G., Winn, J

    Bouma, L. G., Winn, J. N., Ricker, G. R., et al. 2020, AJ, 160, 86, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ab9e73 Briceño, C., Calvet, N., Hernández, J., et al. 2019, AJ, 157, 85, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aaf79b

    2020 doi

  2. [11]

    P., Oishi, J

    Brown, B. P., Oishi, J. S., Vasil, G. M., Lecoanet, D., & Burns, K. J. 2020, ApJL, 902, L3, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/abb9a4 CPV PLASMATORUS15 Time [BJDTDB] RV (kms −1)σ RV (kms −1) 2460357.954919 2.73 5.86 2460357.965845 -4.40 2.37 2460357.976770 -0.19 2.64 2460357.987698 3.84 2...

    2020

  3. [12]

    R., Vedantham, H

    Callingham, J. R., Vedantham, H. K., Shimwell, T. W., et al. 2021, Nature Astronomy, 5, 1233, doi: 10.1038/s41550-021-01483-0

    2021 doi

  4. [13]

    Q., Petit, P., Donati, J

    Cang, T. Q., Petit, P., Donati, J. F., & Folsom, C. P. 2021, A&A, 654, A42, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202141975

    2021 doi

  5. [14]

    Q., Petit, P., Donati, J

    Cang, T. Q., Petit, P., Donati, J. F., et al. 2020, A&A, 643, A39, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202037693

    2020 doi

  6. [15]

    2014, MNRAS, 444, 2525, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu1605

    Chen, Y ., Girardi, L., Bressan, A., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 444, 2525, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu1605

    2014 doi

  7. [16]

    A., et al

    Chubak, C., Marcy, G., Fischer, D. A., et al. 2012, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1207.6212, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1207.6212 Collier Cameron, A., & Robinson, R. D. 1989, MNRAS, 236, 57, doi: 10.1093/mnras/236.1.57 Collier Cameron, A., & Woods, J. A. 1992, MNRAS, 258, 360, doi: 10.1093/m...

    2012 doi arXiv

  8. [17]

    2014, ApJ, 786, 100, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/786/2/100

    Croll, B., Rappaport, S., DeV ore, J., et al. 2014, ApJ, 786, 100, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/786/2/100

    2014 doi

  9. [18]

    M., Wright, E

    Cutri, R. M., Wright, E. L., Conrow, T., et al. 2021, VizieR Online Data Catalog, II/328

    2021

  10. [19]

    Dahm, S. E. 2015, ApJ, 813, 108, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/813/2/108

    2015 doi

  11. [20]

    Daley-Yates, S., & Jardine, M. M. 2024, MNRAS, 534, 621, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae2131

    2024 doi

  12. [21]

    M., & Johnston, C

    Daley-Yates, S., Jardine, M. M., & Johnston, C. D. 2023, MNRAS, 526, 1646, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad2752

    2023 doi

  13. [22]

    2006, Science, 311, 633, doi: 10.1126/science.1121102

    Donati, J.-F., Forveille, T., Collier Cameron, A., et al. 2006, Science, 311, 633, doi: 10.1126/science.1121102

    2006 doi

  14. [23]

    F., & Landstreet, J

    Donati, J. F., & Landstreet, J. D. 2009, ARA&A, 47, 333, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-082708-101833

    2009 doi

  15. [25]

    T., Curtis, J

    Douglas, S. T., Curtis, J. L., Agüeros, M. A., et al. 2019, ApJ, 879, 100, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab2468

    2019 doi

  16. [26]

    Draine, B. T. 2011, Physics of the Interstellar and Intergalactic Medium

    2011

  17. [27]

    D., & Charbonneau, D

    Dressing, C. D., & Charbonneau, D. 2015, ApJ, 807, 45, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/807/1/45

    2015 doi

  18. [28]

    J., Collier Cameron, A., Barnes, J

    Dunstone, N. J., Collier Cameron, A., Barnes, J. R., & Jardine, M. 2006, MNRAS, 373, 1308, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.11128.x

    2006

  19. [29]

    Feiden, G. A. 2016, A&A, 593, A99, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201527613

    2016 doi

  20. [30]

    D., Montet, B

    Feinstein, A. D., Montet, B. T., Ansdell, M., et al. 2020, AJ, 160, 219, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/abac0a

    2020 doi

  21. [31]

    Ferreira, J. M. 2000, MNRAS, 316, 647, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03540.x

    2000

  22. [32]

    France, K., Loyd, R. O. P., Youngblood, A., et al. 2016, ApJ, 820, 89, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/820/2/89 Gagné, J., Mamajek, E. E., Malo, L., et al. 2018, ApJ, 856, 23, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaae09 Gaia Collaboration, Brown, A. G. A., Vallenari, A., et al. 2018, A&A, 616, A1, d...

    2016 doi

  23. [33]

    W., Rojas-Ayala, B., et al

    Gaidos, E., Mann, A. W., Rojas-Ayala, B., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 514, 1386, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac1433

    2022 doi

  24. [34]

    Gray, D. F. 2008, The Observation and Analysis of Stellar Photospheres 16 BOUMA ET AL

    2008

  25. [35]

    2018, The Journal of Open Source Software, 3, 695, doi: 10.21105/joss.00695

    Green, G. 2018, The Journal of Open Source Software, 3, 695, doi: 10.21105/joss.00695

    2018 doi

  26. [36]

    M., Schlafly, E., Zucker, C., Speagle, J

    Green, G. M., Schlafly, E., Zucker, C., Speagle, J. S., & Finkbeiner, D. 2019, ApJ, 887, 93, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab5362 Günther, M. N., Berardo, D. A., Ducrot, E., et al. 2022, AJ, 163, 144, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ac503c

    2019 doi

  27. [37]

    E., Lada, E

    Haisch, Jr., K. E., Lada, E. A., & Lada, C. J. 2001, ApJL, 553, L153, doi: 10.1086/320685

    2001 doi

  28. [38]

    1963, Progress of Theoretical Physics, 30, 460, doi: 10.1143/PTP.30.460

    Hayashi, C., & Nakano, T. 1963, Progress of Theoretical Physics, 30, 460, doi: 10.1143/PTP.30.460

    1963 doi

  29. [39]

    W., Johnson, J

    Howard, A. W., Johnson, J. A., Marcy, G. W., et al. 2010, ApJ, 721, 1467, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/721/2/1467

    2010 doi

  30. [40]

    G., & Storey, P

    Hummer, D. G., & Storey, P. J. 1987, MNRAS, 224, 801, doi: 10.1093/mnras/224.3.801

    1987 doi

  31. [41]

    L., & Reffert, S

    Hunt, E. L., & Reffert, S. 2024, A&A, 686, A42, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202348662

    2024 doi

  32. [42]

    D., et al

    Hunter, J. D., et al. 2007, Computing in science and engineering, 9, 90

    2007

  33. [43]

    O., Wende-von Berg, S., Dreizler, S., et al

    Husser, T. O., Wende-von Berg, S., Dreizler, S., et al. 2013, A&A, 553, A6, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201219058

    2013 doi

  34. [44]

    Jardine, M., Collier Cameron, A., & Donati, J. F. 2002, MNRAS, 333, 339, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05394.x

    2002

  35. [45]

    D., Jackson, R

    Jeffries, R. D., Jackson, R. J., Wright, N. J., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 523, 802, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad1293

    2023 doi

  36. [46]

    M., Twicken, J

    Jenkins, J. M., Twicken, J. D., McCauliff, S., et al. 2016, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference

    2016

  37. [47]

    9913, Software and Cyberinfrastructure for Astronomy IV , ed

    Series, V ol. 9913, Software and Cyberinfrastructure for Astronomy IV , ed. G. Chiozzi & J. C. Guzman, 99133E, doi: 10.1117/12.2233418

    doi

  38. [48]

    M., Prato, L., McLane, J

    Johns-Krull, C. M., Prato, L., McLane, J. N., et al. 2016, ApJ, 830, 15, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/830/1/15

    2016 doi

  39. [49]

    2018, Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society, 2, 4, doi: 10.3847/2515-5172/aaa4b7

    Kanodia, S., & Wright, J. 2018, Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society, 2, 4, doi: 10.3847/2515-5172/aaa4b7

    2018 doi

  40. [50]

    Kaur, S., Viganò, D., Béjar, V . J. S., et al. 2024, A&A, 691, L17, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202452037

    2024 doi

  41. [51]

    G., Fossati, L., Johnstone, C

    Kislyakova, K. G., Fossati, L., Johnstone, C. P., et al. 2018, ApJ, 858, 105, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aabae4

    2018 doi

  42. [52]

    2021, A&A Rv, 29, 1, doi: 10.1007/s00159-020-00130-3

    Kochukhov, O. 2021, A&A Rv, 29, 1, doi: 10.1007/s00159-020-00130-3

    2021 doi

  43. [53]

    2017, ApJL, 835, L4, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/835/1/L4

    Kochukhov, O., & Lavail, A. 2017, ApJL, 835, L4, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/835/1/L4

    2017 doi

  44. [54]

    2011, ApJ, 726, 24, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/726/1/24

    Kochukhov, O., Lundin, A., Romanyuk, I., & Kudryavtsev, D. 2011, ApJ, 726, 24, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/726/1/24

    2011 doi

  45. [55]

    2021, A&A, 647, L1, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202140400 —

    Koen, C. 2021, A&A, 647, L1, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202140400 —. 2023, MNRAS, 518, 2921, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac3276 Krtiˇcka, J., Mikulášek, Z., Kurfürst, P., & Oksala, M. E. 2022, A&A, 659, A37, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202141997

    2021 doi

  46. [56]

    2020, MNRAS, 494, 62, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa689

    Lee, J., Song, I., & Murphy, S. 2020, MNRAS, 494, 62, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa689

    2020 doi

  47. [57]

    V ., et al

    Leitzinger, M., Odert, P., Zaqarashvili, T. V ., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 463, 965, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw1922

    2016 doi

  48. [58]

    2008, A&A, 482, 883, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20078467 Mikulášek, Z., Krtiˇcka, J., Shultz, M

    Marigo, P., Girardi, L., Bressan, A., et al. 2008, A&A, 482, 883, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20078467 Mikulášek, Z., Krtiˇcka, J., Shultz, M. E., et al. 2020, in Stellar Magnetism: A Workshop in Honour of the Career and Contributions of John D. Landstreet, ed. G. Wade, E. Alecian,...

    2008 doi arXiv

  49. [59]

    1985, Ap&SS, 116, 285, doi: 10.1007/BF00653783 Open-AI

    Nakajima, R. 1985, Ap&SS, 116, 285, doi: 10.1007/BF00653783 Open-AI. 2025, ChatGPT, Model o3; Conversational AI model used for editing manuscript and generating testable code; the author wrote all of the original manuscript text. https://chat.openai.com/

    1985 doi

  50. [60]

    J., & Mamajek, E

    Pecaut, M. J., & Mamajek, E. E. 2016, MNRAS, 461, 794, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw1300

    2016 doi

  51. [61]

    P., Wade, G

    Petit, V ., Owocki, S. P., Wade, G. A., et al. 2013, MNRAS, 429, 398, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sts344

    2013 doi

  52. [62]

    2024, ApJ, 963, 122, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad1bef

    Pfalzner, S., & Dincer, F. 2024, ApJ, 963, 122, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad1bef

    2024 doi

  53. [63]

    2019, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1912.11554, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1912.11554

    Phan, D., Pradhan, N., & Jankowiak, M. 2019, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1912.11554, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1912.11554

    2019 doi arXiv

  54. [64]

    K., Curtis, J

    Popinchalk, M., Faherty, J. K., Curtis, J. L., et al. 2023, ApJ, 945, 114, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acb055

    2023 doi

  55. [65]

    V ., Apai, D., & Giampapa, M

    Rackham, B. V ., Apai, D., & Giampapa, M. S. 2018, ApJ, 853, 122, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaa08c

    2018 doi

  56. [66]

    A., Curtis, J

    Rampalli, R., Agüeros, M. A., Curtis, J. L., et al. 2021, ApJ, 921, 167, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac0c1e

    2021 doi

  57. [67]

    2018, A&A, 612, A99, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201731738 Ratzenböck, S., Großschedl, J

    Randich, S., Tognelli, E., Jackson, R., et al. 2018, A&A, 612, A99, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201731738 Ratzenböck, S., Großschedl, J. E., Möller, T., et al. 2023, A&A, 677, A59, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202243690

    2018 doi

  58. [68]

    T., Lisse, C., von Hippel, T., & Mullally, F

    Reach, W. T., Lisse, C., von Hippel, T., & Mullally, F. 2009, ApJ, 693, 697, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/693/1/697

    2009 doi

  59. [69]

    M., Stauffer, J

    Rebull, L. M., Stauffer, J. R., Cody, A. M., et al. 2020, AJ, 159, 273, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ab893c —. 2018, AJ, 155, 196, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aab605

    2020 doi

  60. [70]

    M., Stauffer, J

    Rebull, L. M., Stauffer, J. R., Hillenbrand, L. A., et al. 2017, ApJ, 839, 92, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa6aa4 —. 2022, AJ, 164, 80, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ac75f1

    2017 doi

  61. [71]

    M., Stauffer, J

    Rebull, L. M., Stauffer, J. R., Bouvier, J., et al. 2016, AJ, 152, 114, doi: 10.3847/0004-6256/152/5/114

    2016 doi

  62. [72]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2404.02932, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2404.02932

    Redfield, S., Batalha, N., Benneke, B., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2404.02932, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2404.02932

    2024 doi arXiv

  63. [73]

    J., et al

    Reiners, A., Shulyak, D., Käpylä, P. J., et al. 2022, A&A, 662, A41, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202243251 Ribas, Á., Bouy, H., & Merín, B. 2015, A&A, 576, A52, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201424846 CPV PLASMATORUS17

    2022 doi

  64. [74]

    R., Winn, J

    Ricker, G. R., Winn, J. N., Vanderspek, R., et al. 2015, Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems, 1, 014003, doi: 10.1117/1.JATIS.1.1.014003

    2015 doi

  65. [75]

    1989, Advances in Space Research, 9, 59, doi: 10.1016/0273-1177(89)90241-X

    Rickman, H. 1989, Advances in Space Research, 9, 59, doi: 10.1016/0273-1177(89)90241-X

    1989 doi

  66. [76]

    Donati, J. F. 2023, MNRAS, 518, 4734, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac3302

    2023 doi

  67. [77]

    E., Wade, G

    Shultz, M. E., Wade, G. A., Rivinius, T., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 475, 5144, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty103

    2018 doi

  68. [78]

    2019, A&A, 626, A86, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201935315

    Shulyak, D., Reiners, A., Nagel, E., et al. 2019, A&A, 626, A86, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201935315

    2019 doi

  69. [79]

    M., Wisniewski, J

    Silverberg, S. M., Wisniewski, J. P., Kuchner, M. J., et al. 2020, ApJ, 890, 106, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab68e6

    2020 doi

  70. [81]

    F., Cutri, R

    Skrutskie, M. F., Cutri, R. M., Stiening, R., et al. 2006, AJ, 131, 1163, doi: 10.1086/498708

    2006 doi

  71. [82]

    2017, AJ, 153, 152, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aa5eb9

    Stauffer, J., Collier Cameron, A., Jardine, M., et al. 2017, AJ, 153, 152, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aa5eb9

    2017 doi

  72. [83]

    J., et al

    Stauffer, J., Rebull, L., David, T. J., et al. 2018, AJ, 155, 63, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aaa19d

    2018 doi

  73. [84]

    M., Jardine, M., et al

    Stauffer, J., Rebull, L. M., Jardine, M., et al. 2021, AJ, 161, 60, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/abc7c6

    2021 doi

  74. [85]

    Stellingwerf, R. F. 1978, ApJ, 224, 953, doi: 10.1086/156444

    1978 doi

  75. [86]

    2020, PASJ, 72, 23, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psz145 TESS Team

    Tanimoto, Y ., Yamashita, T., Ui, T., et al. 2020, PASJ, 72, 23, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psz145 TESS Team. 2021, TESS Light Curves - All Sectors, STScI/MAST, doi: 10.17909/T9-NMC8-F686

    2020 doi

  76. [87]

    M., Rizzuto, A

    Tofflemire, B. M., Rizzuto, A. C., Newton, E. R., et al. 2021, AJ, 161, 171, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/abdf53

    2021 doi

  77. [88]

    2018, AJ, 156, 138, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aad906

    Tokovinin, A., & Briceño, C. 2018, AJ, 156, 138, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aad906

    2018 doi

  78. [89]

    Townsend, R. H. D. 2008, MNRAS, 389, 559, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13462.x

    2008

  79. [90]

    Townsend, R. H. D., & Owocki, S. P. 2005, MNRAS, 357, 251, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.08642.x

    2005

  80. [91]

    Townsend, R. H. D., Owocki, S. P., & Groote, D. 2005, ApJL, 630, L81, doi: 10.1086/462413 TRAPPIST-1 JWST Community Initiative, de Wit, J., Doyon, R., et al. 2024, Nature Astronomy, 8, 810, doi: 10.1038/s41550-024-02298-5 Van Der Walt, S., Colbert, S. C., & Varoquaux, G. 2011,...

    2005 doi

  81. [92]

    2015, Astrophysics and Space Science

    Vial, J.-C., & Engvold, O. 2015, Astrophysics and Space Science

    2015

  82. [93]

    415, Solar Prominences, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-10416-4

    Library, V ol. 415, Solar Prominences, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-10416-4

    doi

  83. [94]

    A., Jardine, M., Opher, M., Donati, J

    Vidotto, A. A., Jardine, M., Opher, M., Donati, J. F., & Gombosi, T. I. 2011, MNRAS, 412, 351, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17908.x Villarreal D’Angelo, C., Jardine, M., Johnstone, C. P., & See, V . 2019, MNRAS, 485, 1448, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz477

    2011

  84. [95]

    I., & Jenkins, J

    Vines, J. I., & Jenkins, J. S. 2022, MNRAS, 513, 2719, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac956

    2022 doi

  85. [97]

    E., et al

    Virtanen, P., Gommers, R., Oliphant, T. E., et al. 2020, Nature Methods, 17, 261, doi: 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2 V ogt, S. S., Allen, S. L., Bigelow, B. C., et al. 1994, SPIE Conference Series, ed. D. L. Crawford & E. R. Craine, V ol. 2198

    2020 doi

  86. [98]

    Waugh, R. F. P., & Jardine, M. M. 2022, MNRAS, 514, 5465, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac1698

    2022 doi

  87. [99]

    G., Henry, T

    Winters, J. G., Henry, T. J., Jao, W.-C., et al. 2019, AJ, 157, 216, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ab05dc

    2019 doi

  88. [100]

    L., Mann, A

    Wood, M. L., Mann, A. W., Barber, M. G., et al. 2023, AJ, 165, 85, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aca8fc

    2023 doi

  89. [101]

    G., Adelman, J., Anderson, John E., J., et al

    York, D. G., Adelman, J., Anderson, John E., J., et al. 2000, AJ, 120, 1579, doi: 10.1086/301513

    2000 doi

  90. [102]

    N., Rappaport, S., et al

    Zhan, Z., Günther, M. N., Rappaport, S., et al. 2019, ApJ, 876, 127, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab158c

    2019 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.