Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 2 cited by

The capillary Gauss curvature flow

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A capillary version of the Gauss curvature flow shrinks every smooth strictly convex capillary hypersurface in a half-space to a boundary point in finite time, and its volume-normalized flow converges to a capillary soliton.

desk verdict A genuinely new capillary Gauss curvature flow with reusable entropy and polar-body tools, but the advertised convergence needs a proof patch in two places. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.09840 v1 pith:V3ZULWUQ submitted 2025-06-11 math.DG math.AP

Xinqun Mei , Guofang Wang , Liangjun Weng This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.DGmath.AP MSC 53C2135K5552A2035B6535C08
keywords capillaryGausscurvatureflowhypersurfacesolitonentropyparabolicMonge-AmpèreequationRobinboundaryconditionhalf-space
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper introduces the capillary Gauss curvature flow, a curvature-driven evolution for strictly convex hypersurfaces that sit inside a half-space and meet its boundary at a fixed contact angle. It claims that every such hypersurface shrinks to a boundary point in finite time, with extinction time given by the initial enclosed volume divided by $(n+1)$ times the volume of the unit spherical cap. It further claims that after rescaling to preserve enclosed volume, the flow converges smoothly to a soliton, a surface satisfying $K = \langle X,\nu\rangle/(1+\cos\theta\langle\nu,e\rangle)$ together with the contact-angle condition. A sympathetic reader should care because this is a capillary (Robin-boundary) counterpart of the classical Gauss curvature flow, and it provides a geometric model for the relaxation of sessile droplets on flat substrates.

What carries the argument

The machinery has four pieces. First, the capillary Gauss map $\widetilde{\nu} = \nu + \cos\theta\, e$ turns the flow into an anisotropic Gauss curvature flow with normal speed $\ell K$, where $\ell = 1+\cos\theta\langle\nu,e\rangle$. Second, using the capillary support function $u = \ell^{-1}\langle X,\nu\rangle$, the flow becomes a parabolic Monge-Ampère equation on the spherical cap $C_\theta$ with a Robin boundary condition; the test functions $\varphi = K/(u-c_0)$ and $P = \log(Ku^\gamma)$ obey homogeneous Neumann conditions on $\partial C_\theta$, so the maximum principle can bound the Gauss curvature from above and below. Third, the boundary maximum principle applied to $\Phi = \Delta h + n h$ bounds the principal curvatures, and this is the step that needs $\theta<\pi/2$. Fourth, the capillary entropy $E_\theta(b\Sigma) = \sup_z (1/\omega_\theta)\int_{C_\theta} \log u_z\, \ell\, d\sigma$, bounded below by a non-sharp capillary Blaschke-Santaló inequality, is monotone along the normalized flow and controls capillary inner and outer radii, yielding the compactness that produces the soliton limit.

What would settle it

Run the normalized flow (4.5) numerically from a strictly convex capillary initial surface that is not a spherical cap, with $\theta=\pi/3$ in $\mathbb{R}^3_+$, and inspect the Hausdorff limit of the rescaled surfaces. If the limit is a non-smooth set, a line segment, or a smooth surface that fails the soliton equation (1.8), the convergence claim fails; a second decisive test is to exhibit two distinct smooth strictly convex solutions of (1.8) for the same $\theta<\pi/2$, which would disprove the proposed uniqueness conjecture.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central result, Theorem 1.1, is that for any smooth strictly convex capillary hypersurface in $\mathbb{R}^{n+1}_+$ with contact angle $\theta\in(0,\pi/2)$, the flow $\partial_t X = -K(\nu+\cos\theta\, e)$ keeps the surfaces strictly convex, exists on $[0,T^*)$ with $T^* = \mathrm{Vol}(b\Sigma_0)/((n+1)\mathrm{Vol}(bC_\theta))$, and as $t\to T^*$ the surface shrinks to a single point $p$ lying on the boundary hyperplane. The volume-normalized flow converges, as $t\to +\infty$, to a smooth strictly convex capillary hypersurface $\Sigma_\infty$ that solves the soliton equation $K = \langle X,\nu\rangle/(1+\cos\theta\langle\nu,e\rangle)$ with $\langle\nu,e\rangle = -\cos\theta$ on $\partial\Sigma_\infty$. The spherical cap $C_\theta$ is itself such a soliton. The proof is split into two parts: Theorem 3.1 establishes finite-time extinction and point convergence, and Theorem 4.3 establishes soliton convergence for the normalized flow.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is an unstated step in the proof of Theorem 3.1: if the shrinking family collapsed to a lower-dimensional set instead of a point, the boundary of that collapsed set would contain a point where the evolving surfaces' principal curvatures become arbitrarily small, and this assertion is made without proof.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Every smooth strictly convex capillary hypersurface in a half-space with contact angle $\theta<\pi/2$ contracts to a boundary point in finite time, with the death time computed purely from the initial enclosed volume.
  • The volume-preserving rescaling exists for all time and converges to a capillary soliton, so the late-time shape of the droplet-like surface is a self-similar profile rather than a point.
  • If the paper's proposed uniqueness conjecture holds, the rescaled flow necessarily approaches the spherical cap, giving a capillary analogue of the classical conclusion that worn stones become round.
  • The same entropy and estimates are expected to handle the capillary $\alpha$-power Gauss curvature flow, with finite-time extinction and soliton convergence for $\alpha>1/(n+2)$.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the soliton classification conjecture is proved, Theorem 1.1 would imply that every such flow rounds off to a uniquely determined spherical cap; the paper leaves this classification open.
  • The capillary entropy framework and the $\theta$-capillary convex bodies introduced in Section 6 are likely to transfer to other capillary evolution problems, since they control radii without smoothness assumptions.
  • The restriction $\theta<\pi/2$ enters only at the boundary maximum principle for the harmonic curvature; extending the principal-curvature estimate to $\theta\ge\pi/2$, including the free-boundary case $\theta=\pi/2$, would be a natural next step but is not claimed here.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper introduces a capillary Gauss curvature flow for smooth strictly convex capillary hypersurfaces in the Euclidean half-space with contact angle θ ∈ (0, π/2). The main theorem (Theorem 1.1) has two parts: finite-time contraction to a point on the boundary hyperplane (Theorem 3.1, T* = Vol(bΣ0)/((n+1)Vol(cCθ))), and convergence of the volume-normalized flow to a smooth strictly convex capillary soliton satisfying (1.8) (Theorem 4.3). The proof strategy adapts Tso's and Guan–Ni's methods to the capillary setting: the flow is rewritten as a parabolic Monge–Ampère equation with Robin boundary condition, a priori curvature estimates are obtained via new test functions satisfying homogeneous Neumann conditions, and a capillary entropy functional is introduced and shown to be monotone. A capillary Blaschke–Santaló inequality and a stability estimate for the entropy point are developed to obtain uniform C0 and C2 estimates for the normalized flow.

Significance. If the stated theorems were fully proven, this would be a substantial contribution: it provides the first capillary counterpart of Tso's finite-time extinction result and of Guan–Ni's convergence-to-soliton theorem, and the newly introduced capillary entropy, capillary polar body, and Blaschke–Santaló inequality are of independent interest. The paper also contains several technically useful estimates, including two-sided principal curvature bounds and a positive lower bound for the capillary support function along the normalized flow. However, two load-bearing gaps prevent the paper from fully establishing its advertised conclusions: the proof of global convergence in Theorem 4.3 only yields subsequential convergence to a soliton, and the exclusion of lower-dimensional collapse in Theorem 3.1 rests on an unproved geometric assertion. These issues are fixable by weakening the statements to subsequential convergence and by supplying a rigorous argument for the collapse exclusion, but they are nontrivial and affect the central claims.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4.5, proof of Theorem 4.3] The proof establishes that every sequence t_j → +∞ has a subsequence along which u(·, t + t_j) converges in C∞ to some stationary solution ū∞ of (4.5), i.e. to a soliton. This is only subsequential convergence. The final paragraph attempts to upgrade to full convergence by contradiction, but the contradiction assumes that every subsequential limit must coincide with the previously chosen u∞. That assumption is exactly the uniqueness of solitons with fixed normalized volume and fixed capillary entropy value E∞, which is not proven and is explicitly left open in Conjecture 1.2. Consequently, the global convergence assertion in Theorem 4.3 (and hence the corresponding part of Theorem 1.1) is not justified. The theorem should be weakened to subsequential convergence, or a proof of the needed uniqueness of solitons must be supplied.
  2. [§3.4, proof of Theorem 3.1] In the final paragraph, the authors assert that if ∩_{t≥0} bΣ_t were not a point but had zero volume, then 'there must be some point with arbitrarily small principal curvature' along the boundary of H ∩ ∂(∩_{t≥0} bΣ_t). This assertion is load-bearing for excluding collapse to a lower-dimensional set and forcing the limit to be a single point. It is stated without proof, and the uniform lower bound on principal curvatures from Proposition 3.8 applies to the smooth evolving hypersurfaces Σ_t, not directly to the convex limit set. A rigorous compactness argument (for example, using the uniform C² estimates to pass to a limit and then analyzing the boundary of the limiting convex set) is needed here. As written, this step is a gap in the proof of Theorem 3.1.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract] The phrase 'which we callcapillary Gauss curvature flow' is missing a space; it should be 'which we call capillary Gauss curvature flow'.
  2. [Theorem 1.1] The notation T* := Vol(bΣ0)/((n+1)Vol(cCθ)) uses cCθ before the set Cθ is defined in the preceding paragraph; please define cCθ explicitly at its first use.
  3. [§2.2, Proposition 2.4] In the proof of Proposition 2.4, the Jacobian determinant is computed as det(DΨ(ξ)) = 1/ℓ^{n+2}(ξ), but the displayed matrix appears to have a different scaling in the last row; please verify this computation and the stated positivity.
  4. [§3.3, Proposition 3.8] In equation (3.22), the term involving cos θ ⟨e_i, e⟩ appears with a sign that is not justified; please check whether the constant C in (3.22) can indeed be chosen independent of ℓ and θ in the range (0, π/2).
  5. [§5] Theorem 5.3 is introduced as a result to be established in a forthcoming work but is given the label 'Theorem' rather than 'Conjecture' or 'Expected result'; this may mislead readers about the status of the statement.
  6. [References] Reference [15] is an arXiv preprint that has since been superseded by the published work of Choi–Daskalopoulos; please update the citation to the published version if available.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

The final global-convergence step of Theorem 4.3 assumes the uniqueness it needs, making the advertised convergence to a fixed soliton partially circular.

  1. other [Section 4.5, proof of Theorem 4.3, final paragraph]
    "Finally, we prove that u(ξ, t) globally converges in the C∞-topology to u∞(ξ, t) as t → +∞. We proceed by contradiction. If not, then there there exist l ∈ N and a sequence {tj}j≥1 with tj ↗ +∞, such that sup_{Cθ} |(∇^l u)(ξ, tj) − (∇^l u∞)(ξ)| ≥ τ, for some positive constant τ. On the other hand, we consider the sequence uj(ξ, t) := u(ξ, t+ tj) defined in way of (4.60), we see that uj(ξ, t) (up to a subsequence) converges in C∞ topology to u∞(ξ) on Cθ × {0}."

    The preceding argument only proves that every sequence tj has a further subsequence whose limit is some stationary solution (a soliton) of (4.6); it does not prove that all such subsequential limits coincide. In the contradiction step, the limit of the further subsequence is labeled u∞, the same function selected from an earlier subsequence. Identifying an arbitrary subsequential limit with the previously chosen soliton is exactly the missing uniqueness of solitons, which the paper leaves open in Conjecture 1.2. Thus the global convergence assertion is not derived from the estimates and monotonicity; it is obtained by assuming that all subsequential limits are the same soliton, which is the very conclusion being proved.

full rationale

Most of the derivation is not circular: the capillary Gauss curvature flow (1.3), the normalized flow (4.3), and the soliton equation (1.8) are related by direct computation (stationary solutions of (4.3) satisfy (4.6)), and no fitted parameter or ad hoc normalization forces the soliton shape. The paper's reliance on prior works by the same authors for capillary support function identities, volume formulas, comparison principles, and Minkowski-type integral formulas is self-citation, but those are independent published results with their own derivations and are not used to assume the main theorem. The main circularity is concentrated in the final paragraph of Section 4.5: the proof of global C∞ convergence to a fixed u∞ requires uniqueness of the subsequential soliton limit, but uniqueness is open (Conjecture 1.2). The proof bypasses this by reusing the symbol u∞ for an arbitrary subsequential limit, effectively assuming the conclusion. Separately, the Section 3.4 step asserting the existence of a point with arbitrarily small principal curvature on the boundary of the lower-dimensional limit is asserted without proof; this is a correctness gap in the collapse argument, though not itself a circular dependency. Overall, the paper establishes substantial and non-circular a priori estimates, entropy monotonicity, and subsequential convergence; however, the advertised full convergence in Theorem 1.1 depends on the circular final step, so a partial circularity score is warranted.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 3 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard parabolic Monge-Ampere theory, capillary support function geometry from the authors' earlier work, and several compactness arguments. There are no fitted parameters. The new geometric constructs, the capillary Gauss map, entropy, and polar body, are proof tools introduced by the paper and do not carry independent evidence beyond their internal role.

assumptions (7)
  • standard math Parabolic Monge-Ampere theory with Neumann or oblique boundary conditions provides short-time existence and higher-order estimates.
    Invoked in Proposition 3.2, Theorem 3.1, and Theorem 4.3, citing standard references [17] and [23].
  • domain assumption Comparison principle for capillary curvature flows holds.
    Used in Proposition 3.3 and Theorem 3.1 to bound the flow by a shrinking spherical cap; cited to [36, Proposition 4.2].
  • domain assumption The capillary volume evolution formula d/dt Vol(bΣ_t) = (n+1)(Vol(bΣ_t)-Vol(cC_θ)) holds along the normalized flow.
    Used in Proposition 4.1 and Proposition 4.10; cited to [38, Theorem 1.1].
  • domain assumption Capillary support function parametrization gives a scalar parabolic Monge-Ampere equation with Robin boundary condition ∇_μ h = cot θ h.
    Used to convert the geometric flow into equations (3.1) and (4.4); relies on prior capillary convex geometry in [27] and [28].
  • standard math The classical Blaschke-Santalo inequality holds for the symmetrized convex body Ω.
    Used in Proposition 2.12 to obtain a non-sharp capillary Blaschke-Santalo inequality.
  • standard math Blaschke selection theorem and Hausdorff convergence of convex bodies hold in the appendix.
    Used in Theorem 6.6 to establish compactness and distance estimates for capillary entropy points.
  • domain assumption Strict convexity is preserved along the flow for θ in (0,π/2).
    Proved via two-sided principal curvature estimates in Propositions 3.8 and 4.16; the range θ in (0,π/2) is used for the boundary maximum principle.
invented entities (3)
  • Capillary Gauss map ν̃ = ν + cos θ e
    purpose: Defines the normal speed in the capillary Gauss curvature flow (1.3).
    Introduced in this paper as a capillary adaptation of the Gauss map, with no independent experimental or geometric evidence outside the constructed theory.
  • Capillary entropy functional E_θ(bΣ)
    purpose: Monotone quantity along the normalized flow used to control inner and outer capillary radii.
    Defined in Definition 4.4 as a proof tool; its usefulness is established only within this paper's convergence argument.
  • Capillary polar body bΣ*_z
    purpose: Used to prove a capillary Blaschke-Santalo inequality and to express volumes in terms of capillary support functions.
    Introduced in Definition 2.6 as an auxiliary convex-geometric object; its properties are developed in this paper only.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The capillary Gauss curvature flow." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/V3ZULWUQ

@misc{pith2026250609840,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The capillary Gauss curvature flow},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/V3ZULWUQ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.09840}
}
read the original abstract

In this article, we first introduce a Gauss curvature type flow for capillary hypersurfaces, which we call capillary Gauss curvature flow. We then show that the flow will shrink to a point in finite time. This is a capillary counterpart (or Robin boundary counterpart) of Firey's problem studied in [Mathematika 21 (1974), pp. 1-11] and Tso [Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 38 (1985), no. 6, 867-882]. Finally, we prove that its normalized flow converges to a soliton. This is a capillary counterpart of the result of Guan and Ni in [J. Eur. Math. Soc. 19 (2017), no. 12, 3735-3761]. The classification of solitons remains an open conjecture.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Free boundary flows by powers of the Gauss curvature in the unit ball

    math.DG 2026-07 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

    Strictly convex free-boundary hypersurfaces in the unit ball under α-Gauss curvature flow extinct at a boundary point, and for α>1/(n+2) the volume-normalized Cayley images converge smoothly to the unit hemisphere.

  2. On the conjectured capillary Blaschke-Santal\'o inequality

    math.DG 2025-09 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    The capillary Blaschke-Santalo inequality holds for unconditional strictly convex capillary hypersurfaces with theta in (0, pi/2); for theta in (pi/2, pi) the volume product is unbounded.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

39 extracted references · 36 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Contraction of convex hypersurfaces in Euclidean space

    B. Andrews. “Contraction of convex hypersurfaces in Euclidean space”. In: Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations2.2 (1994), pp. 151–171

    work page 1994

  2. [2]

    Gauss curvature flow: the fate of the rolling stones

    B. Andrews. “Gauss curvature flow: the fate of the rolling stones”. In:Invent. Math. 138.1 (1999), pp. 151–161

    work page 1999

  3. [3]

    Motion of hypersurfaces by Gauss curvature

    B. Andrews. “Motion of hypersurfaces by Gauss curvature”. In: Pacific J. Math. 195.1 (2000), pp. 1–34

    work page 2000

  4. [4]

    Surfaces moving by powers of Gauss curvature

    B. Andrews and X. Chen. “Surfaces moving by powers of Gauss curvature”. In:Pure Appl. Math. Q.8.4 (2012), pp. 825–834

    work page 2012

  5. [5]

    Andrews, B

    B. Andrews, B. Chow, C. Guenther, and M. Langford.Extrinsic geometric flows. Vol. 206. Graduate Studies in Mathematics. American Mathematical Society, Prov- idence, RI, 2020, pp. xxviii+759

    work page 2020

  6. [6]

    Flow by powers of the Gauss curvature

    B. Andrews, P. Guan, and L. Ni. “Flow by powers of the Gauss curvature”. In:Adv. Math. 299 (2016), pp. 174–201

    work page 2016

  7. [7]

    The logarithmic Minkowski conjecture and theLp-Minkowski prob- lem

    K. J. Böröczky. “The logarithmic Minkowski conjecture and theLp-Minkowski prob- lem”. In: Harmonic analysis and convexity. Vol. 9. Adv. Anal. Geom. De Gruyter, Berlin, 2023, pp. 83–118

    work page 2023

  8. [8]

    Anisotropicflow,entropy,and Lp-Minkowskiproblem

    K.J.BöröczkyandP.Guan.“Anisotropicflow,entropy,and Lp-Minkowskiproblem”. In: Canad. J. Math.77.1 (2025), pp. 1–20

    work page 2025

Show all 39 references
  1. [9]

    The log-Brunn-Minkowski inequality

    K. J. Böröczky, E. Lutwak, D. Yang, and G. Zhang. “The log-Brunn-Minkowski inequality”. In:Adv. Math.231.3-4 (2012), pp. 1974–1997

    2012

  2. [10]

    The logarithmic Minkowski problem

    K. J. Böröczky, E. Lutwak, D. Yang, and G. Zhang. “The logarithmic Minkowski problem”. In:J. Amer. Math. Soc.26.3 (2013), pp. 831–852

    2013

  3. [11]

    Uniqueness when theLp curvature is close to be a constant forp ∈ [0, 1)

    K. J. Böröczky and C. Saroglou. “Uniqueness when theLp curvature is close to be a constant forp ∈ [0, 1)”. In:Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations63.6 (2024), Paper No. 154, 26

    2024

  4. [12]

    Asymptotic behavior of flows by powers of the Gaussian curvature

    S. Brendle, K. Choi, and P. Daskalopoulos. “Asymptotic behavior of flows by powers of the Gaussian curvature”. In:Acta Math.219.1 (2017), pp. 1–16

    2017

  5. [13]

    Uniqueness of solutions to the logarithmic Minkowski problem in R3

    S. Chen, Y. Feng, and W. Liu. “Uniqueness of solutions to the logarithmic Minkowski problem in R3”. In:Adv. Math.411.part A (2022), Paper No. 108782, 18

    2022

  6. [14]

    TheLp-Brunn-Minkowski inequality for p <1

    S. Chen, Y. Huang, Q.-R. Li, and J. Liu. “TheLp-Brunn-Minkowski inequality for p <1”. In:Adv. Math.368 (2020), pp. 107166, 21

    2020

  7. [15]

    Uniqueness of closed self-similar solutions to the Gauss curvature flow

    K. Choi and P. Daskalopoulos. “Uniqueness of closed self-similar solutions to the Gauss curvature flow”. In: (2016). arXiv:1609.05487 [math.DG]

    2016 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Deforming convex hypersurfaces by thenth root of the Gaussian curva- ture

    B. Chow. “Deforming convex hypersurfaces by thenth root of the Gaussian curva- ture”. In:J. Differential Geom.22.1 (1985), pp. 117–138

    1985

  9. [17]

    Initial and nonlinear oblique boundary value problems for fully non- linear parabolic equations

    G. C. Dong. “Initial and nonlinear oblique boundary value problems for fully non- linear parabolic equations”. In:J. Partial Differential Equations Ser. A1.2 (1988), pp. 12–42

    1988

  10. [18]

    Shapes of worn stones

    W. J. Firey. “Shapes of worn stones”. In:Mathematika 21 (1974), pp. 1–11

    1974

  11. [19]

    Evolving plane curves by curvature in relative geometries

    M. E. Gage. “Evolving plane curves by curvature in relative geometries”. In:Duke Math. J.72.2 (1993), pp. 441–466

    1993

  12. [20]

    Non-homogeneous fully nonlinear contracting flows of convex hypersurfaces

    P. Guan, J. Huang, and J. Liu. “Non-homogeneous fully nonlinear contracting flows of convex hypersurfaces”. In:Adv. Nonlinear Stud.24.1 (2024), pp. 141–154

    2024

  13. [21]

    Entropy and a convergence theorem for Gauss curvature flow in high dimension

    P. Guan and L. Ni. “Entropy and a convergence theorem for Gauss curvature flow in high dimension”. In:J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS)19.12 (2017), pp. 3735–3761. REFERENCES 45

    2017

  14. [22]

    LocalLp-Brunn-Minkowski inequalities forp <1

    A. V. Kolesnikov and E. Milman. “LocalLp-Brunn-Minkowski inequalities forp <1”. In: Mem. Amer. Math. Soc.277.1360 (2022), pp. v+78

    2022

  15. [23]

    G. M. Lieberman.Second order parabolic differential equations. World Scientific Pub- lishing Co., Inc., River Edge, NJ, 1996, pp. xii+439

    1996

  16. [24]

    The relative isoperimetric inequality for minimal submanifolds with free boundary in the Euclidean space

    L. Liu, G. Wang, and L. Weng. “The relative isoperimetric inequality for minimal submanifolds with free boundary in the Euclidean space”. In:J. Funct. Anal.285.2 (2023), Paper No. 109945, 22

    2023

  17. [25]

    Capillary Schwarz symmetrization in the half-space

    Z. Lu, C. Xia, and X. Zhang. “Capillary Schwarz symmetrization in the half-space”. In: Adv. Nonlinear Stud.23.1 (2023), Paper No. 20220078, 14

    2023

  18. [26]

    A constrained mean curvature flow and Alexandrov- Fenchel inequalities

    X. Mei, G. Wang, and L. Weng. “A constrained mean curvature flow and Alexandrov- Fenchel inequalities”. In:Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN1 (2024), pp. 152–174

    2024

  19. [27]

    The capillary Minkowski problem

    X. Mei, G. Wang, and L. Weng. “The capillary Minkowski problem”. In:Adv. Math. 469 (2025), Paper No. 110230

    2025

  20. [28]

    Alexandrov-Fenchel inequalities for convex hypersurfacesinthehalf-spacewithcapillaryboundaryII

    X. Mei, G. Wang, L. Weng, and C. Xia. “Alexandrov-Fenchel inequalities for convex hypersurfacesinthehalf-spacewithcapillaryboundaryII”.In: Math. Z.310.4(2025), Paper No. 71

    2025

  21. [29]

    On the Blaschke-Santaló inequality

    M. Meyer and A. Pajor. “On the Blaschke-Santaló inequality”. In: Arch. Math. (Basel) 55.1 (1990), pp. 82–93

    1990

  22. [30]

    Un invariante afin para los cuerpos convexos del espacio den dimen- siones

    L. Santaló. “Un invariante afin para los cuerpos convexos del espacio den dimen- siones”. spa. In:Portugaliae mathematica8.4 (1949), pp. 155–161

    1949

  23. [31]

    On affine plane curve evolution

    G. Sapiro and A. Tannenbaum. “On affine plane curve evolution”. In:J. Funct. Anal. 119.1 (1994), pp. 79–120

    1994

  24. [32]

    Remarks on the conjectured log-Brunn-Minkowski inequality

    C. Saroglou. “Remarks on the conjectured log-Brunn-Minkowski inequality”. In: Geom. Dedicata177 (2015), pp. 353–365

    2015

  25. [33]

    Schneider

    R. Schneider. Convex bodies: the Brunn-Minkowski theory. expanded. Vol. 151. En- cyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cam- bridge, 2014, pp. xxii+736

    2014

  26. [34]

    Hypersurfaces with capillary boundary evolving by vol- ume preserving power mean curvature flow

    C. Sinestrari and L. Weng. “Hypersurfaces with capillary boundary evolving by vol- ume preserving power mean curvature flow”. In:Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equa- tions 63.9 (2024), Paper No. 237, 27

    2024

  27. [35]

    Deforming a hypersurface by its Gauss-Kronecker curvature

    K. Tso. “Deforming a hypersurface by its Gauss-Kronecker curvature”. In:Comm. Pure Appl. Math.38.6 (1985), pp. 867–882

    1985

  28. [36]

    A mean curvature type flow with capillary boundary in a unit ball

    G. Wang and L. Weng. “A mean curvature type flow with capillary boundary in a unit ball”. In:Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations59.5 (2020), Paper No. 149, 26

    2020

  29. [37]

    A Minkowski-type inequality for capillary hyper- surfaces in a half-space

    G. Wang, L. Weng, and C. Xia. “A Minkowski-type inequality for capillary hyper- surfaces in a half-space”. In:J. Funct. Anal.287.4 (2024), Paper No. 110496, 22

    2024

  30. [38]

    Alexandrov-Fenchel inequalities for convex hyper- surfaces in the half-space with capillary boundary

    G. Wang, L. Weng, and C. Xia. “Alexandrov-Fenchel inequalities for convex hyper- surfaces in the half-space with capillary boundary”. In:Math. Ann. 388.2 (2024), pp. 2121–2154

    2024

  31. [39]

    Non-uniqueness of self-similar shrinking curves for an anisotropic cur- vature flow

    H. Yagisita. “Non-uniqueness of self-similar shrinking curves for an anisotropic cur- vature flow”. In:Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations26.1 (2006), pp. 49–55. 46 REFERENCES (X. Mei) Key Laboratory of Pure and Applied Mathematics, School of Mathematical Sciences, Pekin...

    2006

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.