Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 7 minor 98 references

Characterizing gas flows through observations of the disk-CGM interface with the HWO

T0 review · 3 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The HWO needs a multi-object UV spectrograph covering 940–3500 Å at R=100,000, and an 8-meter aperture can reach the required sensitivity.

desk verdict Useful HWO UV spectrograph requirements paper with real target-count and resolution evidence, but the 8m aperture rests on an unvalidated efficiency gain and an internal 21/22 magnitude inconsistency that need fixing before it anchors mission specs. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.10517 v1 pith:VEREJREF submitted 2025-06-12 astro-ph.GA

Sanchayeeta Borthakur , Joseph N. Burchett , Frances Cashman , Andrew J. Fox , Yong Zheng , David M. French , Rongmon Bordoloi , Brad Koplitz This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords HabitableWorldsObservatoryultravioletspectroscopymulti-objectspectrographcircumgalacticmediumdisk-halointerfacegalacticgasflowsabsorption-lineinstrumentdesign
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that the Habitable Worlds Observatory will only be able to characterize how gas flows into, through, and out of galaxies if it is built with a multi-object ultraviolet spectrograph that continuously covers 940–3500 Å, resolves individual kinematic components at R=100,000 (with 50,000 as the floor), and uses thousands of sub-arcsecond slitlets across a 6′×6′ field. The authors estimate that an 8-meter primary mirror—3.3 times Hubble's diameter—is enough to reach a signal-to-noise of 10 for a 21st-magnitude FUV continuum source within four hours, assuming a fivefold efficiency gain over HST. If HWO has these capabilities, absorption spectroscopy can map extended disks, high-velocity clouds, molecular hydrogen, and outflows in the disk–CGM interface, and so answer how galaxies acquire and lose gas.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing instrument concept is a high-resolution multi-object ultraviolet spectrograph (MOS) with photon-counting detectors, operating at R=100,000 with continuous 940–3500 Å coverage. The physical mechanism it exploits is absorption-line spectroscopy: background QSOs and UV-bright galaxies serve as continuum lamps against which cold, warm, and hot gas in the disk–CGM interface imprints narrow absorption components; the velocity structure, column densities, and ionization states of those components reveal whether gas is flowing in or out. The aperture argument is carried by the scaling relation sqrt(155/14.4) ≈ 3.3, comparing the 155 ksec COS would need to reach S/N=10 for a 21 mag source at R=20,000 with the 14.4 ksec HWO would need at R=100,000, together with the assumed fivefold efficiency gain over HST.

What would settle it

A concrete check: build a detailed end-to-end throughput model for a realistic HWO optical train (mirror coatings, grating efficiencies, detector quantum efficiency, slit losses) and compute the exposure time to reach S/N=10 at R=100,000 for a 21 AB mag source near 1250 Å; if that time exceeds 14.4 ksec for an 8 m aperture under the assumed efficiency, the aperture claim fails. A simpler observational check: compare the number of FUV-bright 21 mag QSOs predicted from the GALEX and Milliquas catalogs against counts from a deeper UV survey.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the disk–CGM interface—the region between the star-forming disk and the circumgalactic medium—holds the signatures of all gas flows, and that UV absorption spectroscopy with a specific set of instrument parameters is the only way to read them. Continuous wavelength coverage from 940 to 3500 Å (minimum 970–3000 Å) gives access to the full Lyman series, O VI, C III, H2 bands, and low-ionization metal lines; R≈100,000 (minimum 50,000) resolves 3 km/s kinematic components that R≈20,000 instruments like COS blend away; a multi-object spectrograph with thousands of sub-arcsecond slitlets over 6′×6′ turns each galaxy into a set of tens of sightlines; and a sensitivity of S/N=10 in four hours for a 21 AB mag FUV source—reachable with an 8 m aperture—makes statistical samples possible.

Load-bearing premise

The argument assumes that HWO's end-to-end photon-collection efficiency will be five times better than Hubble's; if the real gain is smaller, the 8-meter aperture no longer reaches the required signal-to-noise, and the needed diameter grows toward 9 meters or beyond.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A single 6′×6′ pointing covers roughly 20 kpc × 20 kpc at 10 Mpc, so one MOS field can simultaneously probe the galaxy disk, multiple QSO sightlines, and the CGM around it.
  • Reaching R=100,000 recovers individual cloud components that are irretrievably blended at COS's R=20,000, making column density and metallicity measurements reliable for the first time.
  • With 21 mag sensitivity, the number of galaxy–QSO pairs grows by orders of magnitude relative to HST-COS, enabling samples of more than 200 galaxies and multi-sightline (3–5) studies of a dozen individual galaxies.
  • Stacking and binning the same MOS data, using photon-counting detectors, lets HWO detect CGM emission lines (Lyα, O VI, C III) around the same fields probed in absorption, giving direct gas densities.
  • If throughput drops by 25% at bluer wavelengths, the required aperture rises to 9 m, but the instrument requirements otherwise stand.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This reader's inference: the same MOS design, with its thousands of slitlets, would also enable stellar-population and ISM science inside the target galaxies, effectively making HWO a UV-multi-object surveyor; the paper does not develop this as a science case.
  • This reader's inference: the requirement that stacking and binning improve S/N implies a detector with negligible read noise; the paper names photon-counting detectors but does not translate this into a specific dark-current or read-noise specification, which would be a concrete engineering target.
  • This reader's inference: since the sample-size estimates depend on the GALEX and Milliquas catalogs, a deeper all-sky UV survey would directly increase the number of viable galaxy–QSO pairs, amplifying the science return of the proposed instrument.
  • This reader's inference: the aperture estimate is deliberately zeroth-order; a detailed error budget including slit losses, grating efficiencies, and detector quantum efficiency as functions of wavelength could push the required aperture above 8 m even at the nominal fivefold efficiency gain.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 7 minor

Summary. This paper presents a science case for equipping the Habitable Worlds Observatory (HWO) with a multi-object ultraviolet spectrograph dedicated to studies of the disk-CGM interface. The authors argue that absorption spectroscopy of gas flows requires continuous wavelength coverage from 940 to 3500 Å (minimum 970–3000 Å), spectral resolving power R ≈ 100,000 (minimum 50,000), a 6′ × 6′ field of view with thousands of sub-arcsecond slitlets, and sensitivity sufficient to reach S/N = 10 for a 21 AB magnitude FUV continuum source in a few hours. From these requirements they estimate an optimal aperture of about 8 meters, using a scaling relative to HST/COS. The argument is supported by a review of current observations (HST/COS, FUSE), public QSO-galaxy pair catalogs, and synthetic spectra from the MAIHEM simulations.

Significance. If the requirements survive closer scrutiny, the paper provides a useful, externally anchored baseline for HWO instrument definition and connects a concrete observational program to the Astro2020 decadal priorities. Its strengths include anchoring to public catalogs for sample statistics, using an independent simulation for the resolution argument, and distinguishing ideal from minimum specifications. The quantitative headline numbers, however, are more fragile than the prose suggests: the 8 m aperture depends on an unvalidated efficiency factor, and the limiting magnitude is stated inconsistently across sections. The paper is best read as a community science-case input; as a refereed requirements document, the load-bearing numbers need additional justification and internal consistency.

major comments (3)
  1. [§4.2, §4.5, Table 3] The target sensitivity is internally inconsistent. Section 4.2 states that 'the sensitivity of HWO should enable observations of 22 FUV AB magnitude targets to provide large enough samples and do so at S/N ∼10 in reasonable exposure times,' tying the sample-size goal to a limiting magnitude of 22. The abstract, §4.5, Table 3, and the conclusion instead specify a 21 mag target. Because one magnitude is a factor of 10^-0.4 = 0.398 in flux, reaching S/N = 10 for a 22 mag source requires 2.51 times more collecting area than for 21 mag, or a diameter larger by sqrt(2.51) ≈ 1.58. Applied to the §4.5 scaling, this gives roughly 12.5–13 m rather than 8 m. The phrase 'limiting FUV magnitude of 21 or higher' in §4.2 does not resolve the conflict. The paper must either explicitly retract the 22 mag requirement or carry it through the aperture calculation; as written, the requirements traceability is broken and the headline aperture is not uniquely defined.
  2. [§4.5] The assumed five-fold improvement in end-to-end photon-collection efficiency of HWO relative to HST is the single most load-bearing unvalidated number in the paper. It enters directly into the aperture estimate: the ratio sqrt(155/14.4) = 3.3 is multiplied by the HST diameter only after folding in the factor of five efficiency gain. If the real gain is 3× or 7×, the required aperture changes correspondingly, and the authors note a 25% blue-throughput drop would already push the aperture to 9 m. The paper labels this a 'back-of-the-envelope calculation,' which is honest but insufficient for a requirements recommendation. I request a sensitivity analysis over a plausible range of efficiency gains and a clear statement of the efficiency value needed for an 8 m aperture to meet the stated S/N and exposure-time goal. Without this, the 8 m figure cannot be treated as a robust HWO requirement.
  3. [§4.4, Fig. 6] The resolution claim is stronger than the evidence presented. The text says R = 100,000 'will guarantee that lines are detected beyond the confusion limit due to blending' and that R = 50,000 is the 'minimum resolution required to guarantee the detection of the individual lines.' Figure 6 shows a single synthetic sightline from the MAIHEM simulations at one impact parameter, with no noise, no variation in halo mass or viewing geometry, and no quantitative component-recovery metric. The figure caption itself concedes that at R = 100,000 'some of the narrow saturated lines may look unsaturated,' which is in tension with the word 'perfectly resolve' in the text. A robust requirements statement would need at least a small grid of realizations and a recovery fraction as a function of resolution and S/N. I recommend softening the guarantee language and presenting such a test.
minor comments (7)
  1. [§5] Conclusion item 1 says 'Sensitivity to detect 21 mag FUV target with S/N ≤10 in a few hours'; the inequality should be S/N ≥ 10, consistent with Table 3 and the rest of the text.
  2. [§2.2] The list 'Si II, Si II, Si IV, C IV, O VI' repeats Si II; it likely should read 'Si II, Si III, Si IV, C IV, O VI.'
  3. [Table 3] The phrase 'contiguous coverage from extreme-UV to optical, i.e., from 940–3500 Å' is inaccurate: 3500 Å is the near-UV, not the optical. Rephrase as 'extreme-UV to near-UV.'
  4. [§4.5] The displayed scaling 'sqrt(155/14.4) = 3.3 times that of HST or 8 m' should explicitly state that 8 m = 3.3 × 2.4 m, so the reader can follow the arithmetic.
  5. [Fig. 2 caption] The caption has a run-on sentence after the SDSS citation; insert a period before 'While the numbers might change...'.
  6. [Table 1] The term 'viral temperature' should be 'virial temperature'.
  7. [§4.4] The phrase 'where situation levels are not directly estimated' appears to be a typo for 'saturation levels'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No material circularity: the instrument requirements are anchored to external benchmarks, and the aperture estimate is a transparent scaling from COS; the self-citations and the 5x efficiency assumption are inputs, not self-fulfilling predictions.

full rationale

We find no circular step that reduces a prediction to its own inputs. The central instrument requirements (wavelength coverage 940-3500 A, R=100,000, MOS with thousands of sub-arcsecond slitlets, 6' x 6' FOV) are traced to external anchors: atomic transition lists, archival FUSE and HST-COS spectra, public QSO-galaxy catalogs (GALEX, SDSS, Milliquas), and the MAIHEM simulation [98]. The aperture estimate in Section 4.5 is an explicit back-of-the-envelope scaling from COS's 155 ksec exposure to a stated requirement of S/N=10 for a 21 mag target in 14.4 ksec, giving sqrt(155/14.4)=3.3 times HST, or 8 m; this is a transparent arithmetic consequence of the stated requirement and an assumed efficiency, not a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction. Self-citations exist (refs 6, 7, 10, 19, 52, 96-98), but they are used as observational or theoretical evidence, not as an authority that forbids alternatives; the MAIHEM resolution study is a forward simulation and therefore counts as independent support under the stated review rules. Two numerical inconsistencies deserve correction but are not circularity: Section 4.2 says 22 FUV AB magnitude targets are needed for the sample-size goal, whereas the aperture derivation and conclusions use 21 mag (a one-magnitude shift would raise the required diameter to roughly 12.7 m); and Section 4.5 states a five-fold efficiency gain but then omits that factor from the sqrt(155/14.4) scaling, which would otherwise yield about 3.5 m if applied. These affect correctness and requirement traceability, not self-reference. The score of 2 reflects the presence of several self-citations that are not load-bearing for the main derivation, plus the noted traceability gaps that should be resolved before final requirements are adopted.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on a small number of hand-chosen performance targets and one explicit efficiency assumption. No new physical entities are introduced. The main unvalidated input is the 5x system efficiency gain, which drives the aperture estimate; the science case itself relies on standard astrophysical assumptions about tracer lines and on the representativeness of public catalogs and one simulation.

free parameters (3)
  • System efficiency gain factor of HWO relative to HST = 5x
    Assumed in §4.5 to scale exposure time; directly sets the 8 m aperture estimate. Not derived from any demonstrated technology.
  • Target signal-to-noise ratio threshold = S/N = 10 in 4 hours
    Adopted requirement for the 21 AB mag limiting sensitivity; not derived in the paper.
  • Limiting FUV magnitude for background sources = 21 AB mag (FUV)
    Chosen so that a sufficiently large sample of galaxy-QSO pairs is available (Figs 2, 3); a design choice, not an empirical result.
assumptions (3)
  • standard math Exposure time scales as the inverse square of aperture diameter and linearly with efficiency
    Used in §4.5 to derive the 3.3x aperture factor from the ratio of exposure times; a standard radiometric relation.
  • domain assumption The MAIHEM simulation realistically represents the turbulent component structure of the disk-CGM interface
    Figure 6 and §4.4 use MAIHEM synthetic sightlines to conclude R=100,000 resolves and R=50,000 is the minimum; if the simulation is not representative, the resolution requirements could be wrong.
  • domain assumption The GALEX, SDSS, Milliquas, and NED catalogs used for the target counts are statistically representative at the relevant fluxes and redshifts
    Figures 2 and 3 are built from these public catalogs; the paper notes catalog-dependent variations but does not quantify completeness or selection biases.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Characterizing gas flows through observations of the disk-CGM interface with the HWO." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VEREJREF

@misc{pith2026250610517,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Characterizing gas flows through observations of the disk-CGM interface with the HWO},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VEREJREF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.10517}
}
read the original abstract

How gas gets into, through, and out of galaxies is critical to understanding galactic ecosystems. The disk-CGM interface region is uniquely suited for studying processes that drive gas flows. Matter and energy that enter and leave a galaxy pass through this region; however, the precise pathways are yet to be explored. In this paper, we discuss future observations that will facilitate the discovery of the gas flow pathways in galaxies and the telescope parameters necessary for making those observations. We advocate for high spectral resolution ultraviolet spectroscopic capabilities on the Habitable Worlds Observatory (HWO) that will enable observations in a wavelength range of 940 - 3500 A (minimum range: 970 - 3000 A) and at a resolution of 100,000 (minimum of 50,000). We advocate 19 for a multi-object spectrograph with thousands of sub-arcsec slitlets and a field of view 6' x 6'. We also recommend that the spectrograph be sensitive enough to achieve a signal-to-noise ratio of 10 or higher within a few hours for a continuum source of 21 AB magnitude and estimate an optimal aperture size of 8 meters. These capabilities would enable the characterization of gas in the disk-halo interface, leading to breakthroughs in our understanding of the gas flows and galactic ecosystems.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

98 extracted references · 80 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    How do galaxies get their gas?,

    D. Kere ˇs, N. Katz, D. H. Weinberg, et al., “How do galaxies get their gas?,” MNRAS 363, 2–28 (2005)

    2005

  2. [2]

    Orbiting Circumgalactic Gas as a Signature of Cosmological Accretion,

    K. R. Stewart, T. Kaufmann, J. S. Bullock,et al., “Orbiting Circumgalactic Gas as a Signature of Cosmological Accretion,” ApJ 738, 39 (2011)

    2011

  3. [3]

    The Radial and Azimuthal Profiles of Mg II Absorption around 0.5 ¡ z ¡ 0.9 zCOSMOS Galaxies of Different Colors, Masses, and Envi- ronments,

    R. Bordoloi, S. J. Lilly, C. Knobel, et al. , “The Radial and Azimuthal Profiles of Mg II Absorption around 0.5 ¡ z ¡ 0.9 zCOSMOS Galaxies of Different Colors, Masses, and Envi- ronments,” ApJ 743, 10 (2011). 37

    2011

  4. [4]

    Tracing Outflows and Accretion: A Bimodal Azimuthal Dependence of Mg II Absorption,

    G. G. Kacprzak, C. W. Churchill, and N. M. Nielsen, “Tracing Outflows and Accretion: A Bimodal Azimuthal Dependence of Mg II Absorption,” ApJL 760, L7 (2012)

    2012

  5. [5]

    Gas accretion via condensation and fountains,

    F. Fraternali, “Gas accretion via condensation and fountains,” inGas Accretion onto Galaxies, F. Andrew and D. Romeel, Eds., Astrophysics and Space Science Library 430, 323 (2017)

    2017

  6. [6]

    An HST/COS legacy survey of high-velocity ultravi- olet absorption in the Milky Way’s circumgalactic medium and the Local Group,

    P. Richter, S. E. Nuza, A. J. Fox, et al., “An HST/COS legacy survey of high-velocity ultravi- olet absorption in the Milky Way’s circumgalactic medium and the Local Group,”A&A 607, A48 (2017)

    2017

  7. [7]

    The Mass Inflow and Outflow Rates of the Milky Way,

    A. J. Fox, P. Richter, T. Ashley, et al., “The Mass Inflow and Outflow Rates of the Milky Way,”ApJ 884, 53 (2019)

    2019

  8. [8]

    The Westerbork HI survey of spiral and irregular galaxies. I. HI imaging of late-type dwarf galaxies,

    R. A. Swaters, T. S. van Albada, J. M. van der Hulst, et al., “The Westerbork HI survey of spiral and irregular galaxies. I. HI imaging of late-type dwarf galaxies,” A&A 390, 829–861 (2002)

    2002

Show all 98 references
  1. [9]

    The Hi Distribution of the Milky Way,

    P. M. W. Kalberla and J. Kerp, “The Hi Distribution of the Milky Way,” ARAA 47, 27–61 (2009)

    2009

  2. [10]

    Connection between the Circumgalactic Medium and the Interstellar Medium of Galaxies: Results from the COS-GASS Survey,

    S. Borthakur, T. Heckman, J. Tumlinson, et al., “Connection between the Circumgalactic Medium and the Interstellar Medium of Galaxies: Results from the COS-GASS Survey,” ApJ 813, 46 (2015)

    2015

  3. [11]

    How are Ly α Absorbers in the Cosmic Web Related to Gas-rich Galaxies?,

    S. Borthakur, “How are Ly α Absorbers in the Cosmic Web Related to Gas-rich Galaxies?,” ApJ 924, 123 (2022). 38

    2022

  4. [12]

    Gas Accretion and Angular Momentum,

    K. R. Stewart, “Gas Accretion and Angular Momentum,” in Gas Accretion onto Galaxies , A. Fox and R. Dav´e, Eds., Astrophysics and Space Science Library 430, 249 (2017)

    2017

  5. [13]

    On the angular momentum history of galactic discs,

    A. Renzini, “On the angular momentum history of galactic discs,” MNRAS 495, L42–L45 (2020)

    2020

  6. [14]

    Halo Gas and Galaxy Disk Kinematics Derived from Observations and ΛCDM Simulations of Mg II Absorption-selected Galaxies at Intermediate Redshift,

    G. G. Kacprzak, C. W. Churchill, D. Ceverino, et al., “Halo Gas and Galaxy Disk Kinematics Derived from Observations and ΛCDM Simulations of Mg II Absorption-selected Galaxies at Intermediate Redshift,” ApJ 711, 533–558 (2010)

    2010

  7. [15]

    Quasars Probing Galaxies. I. Signatures of Gas Accretion at Redshift Approximately 0.2,

    S. H. Ho, C. L. Martin, G. G. Kacprzak, et al., “Quasars Probing Galaxies. I. Signatures of Gas Accretion at Redshift Approximately 0.2,” ApJ 835, 267 (2017)

    2017

  8. [16]

    Kinematics of Circumgalactic Gas: Feeding Galaxies and Feedback,

    C. L. Martin, S. H. Ho, G. G. Kacprzak, et al., “Kinematics of Circumgalactic Gas: Feeding Galaxies and Feedback,” ApJ 878, 84 (2019)

    2019

  9. [17]

    Galaxies Probing Galaxies at High Resolution: Co-rotating Gas Associated with a Milky Way Analog at z=0.4,

    A. M. Diamond-Stanic, A. L. Coil, J. Moustakas, et al., “Galaxies Probing Galaxies at High Resolution: Co-rotating Gas Associated with a Milky Way Analog at z=0.4,” ApJ 824, 24 (2016)

    2016

  10. [18]

    Evidence for a Rotational Component in the Circumgalactic Medium of Nearby Galaxies,

    D. M. French and B. P. Wakker, “Evidence for a Rotational Component in the Circumgalactic Medium of Nearby Galaxies,” ApJ 897, 151 (2020)

    2020

  11. [19]

    Discovery of a Low-redshift Damped Ly α System in a Foreground Extended Disk Using a Starburst Galaxy Background Illuminator,

    C. M. Dupuis, S. Borthakur, M. Padave, et al., “Discovery of a Low-redshift Damped Ly α System in a Foreground Extended Disk Using a Starburst Galaxy Background Illuminator,” ApJ 907, 103 (2021)

    2021

  12. [20]

    Signatures of gas flows - I. Connecting the 39 kinematics of the H I circumgalactic medium to galaxy rotation,

    H. Nateghi, G. G. Kacprzak, N. M. Nielsen,et al., “Signatures of gas flows - I. Connecting the 39 kinematics of the H I circumgalactic medium to galaxy rotation,” MNRAS 533, 1321–1340 (2024)

    2024

  13. [21]

    Signatures of gas flows - II. Connecting the kinematics of the multiphase circumgalactic medium to galaxy rotation,

    H. Nateghi, G. G. Kacprzak, N. M. Nielsen, et al., “Signatures of gas flows - II. Connecting the kinematics of the multiphase circumgalactic medium to galaxy rotation,” MNRAS 534, 930–947 (2024)

    2024

  14. [22]

    DIISC-IV . DIISCovery of Anomalously Low Metallicity H II Regions in NGC 99: Indirect Evidence of Gas Inflows,

    A. J. Olvera, S. Borthakur, M. Padave, et al., “DIISC-IV . DIISCovery of Anomalously Low Metallicity H II Regions in NGC 99: Indirect Evidence of Gas Inflows,”ApJ 976, 205 (2024)

    2024

  15. [23]

    DIISC Survey: Deciphering the Interplay Between the Interstellar Medium, Stars, and the Circumgalactic Medium Survey,

    S. Borthakur, M. Padave, T. Heckman, et al. , “DIISC Survey: Deciphering the Interplay Between the Interstellar Medium, Stars, and the Circumgalactic Medium Survey,” arXiv e- prints -, arXiv:2409.12554 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Distribution and origin of high-velocity clouds. II. Statistical analysisof the whole-sky survey.,

    B. P. Wakker, “Distribution and origin of high-velocity clouds. II. Statistical analysisof the whole-sky survey.,”A&A 250, 499 (1991)

    1991

  17. [25]

    A Reservoir of Ionized Gas in the Galactic Halo to Sustain Star Formation in the Milky Way,

    N. Lehner and J. C. Howk, “A Reservoir of Ionized Gas in the Galactic Halo to Sustain Star Formation in the Milky Way,”Science 334, 955 (2011)

    2011

  18. [26]

    Gaseous Galaxy Halos,

    M. E. Putman, J. E. G. Peek, and M. R. Joung, “Gaseous Galaxy Halos,” ARAA 50, 491–529 (2012)

    2012

  19. [27]

    The H I Column Density Distribution of the Galactic Disk and Halo,

    D. M. French, A. J. Fox, B. P. Wakker, et al., “The H I Column Density Distribution of the Galactic Disk and Halo,” ApJ 923, 50 (2021)

    2021

  20. [28]

    The Hubble Space Telescope Quasar Absorption Line Key Project. III. First Observational Results on Milky Way Gas,

    B. D. Savage, L. Lu, J. N. Bahcall, et al., “The Hubble Space Telescope Quasar Absorption Line Key Project. III. First Observational Results on Milky Way Gas,”ApJ 413, 116 (1993). 40

    1993

  21. [29]

    Multiphase High-Velocity Clouds toward HE 0226-4110 and PG 0953+414,

    A. J. Fox, B. P. Wakker, B. D. Savage, et al., “Multiphase High-Velocity Clouds toward HE 0226-4110 and PG 0953+414,” ApJ 630, 332–354 (2005)

    2005

  22. [30]

    Characterizing Transition Temperature Gas in the Galactic Corona,

    B. P. Wakker, B. D. Savage, A. J. Fox, et al., “Characterizing Transition Temperature Gas in the Galactic Corona,” ApJ 749, 157 (2012)

    2012

  23. [31]

    Distances to Galactic High-Velocity Clouds: Complex C,

    B. P. Wakker, D. G. York, J. C. Howk, et al., “Distances to Galactic High-Velocity Clouds: Complex C,” ApJL 670, L113–L116 (2007)

    2007

  24. [32]

    Cold Gas Accretion by High-velocity Clouds and Their Connection to QSO Absorption-line Systems,

    P. Richter, “Cold Gas Accretion by High-velocity Clouds and Their Connection to QSO Absorption-line Systems,” ApJ 750, 165 (2012)

    2012

  25. [33]

    On the Continuing Formation of the Andromeda Galaxy: Detection of H I Clouds in the M31 Halo,

    D. A. Thilker, R. Braun, R. A. M. Walterbos, et al., “On the Continuing Formation of the Andromeda Galaxy: Detection of H I Clouds in the M31 Halo,” ApJL 601, L39–L42 (2004)

    2004

  26. [34]

    Relics of structure formation: extra-planar gas and high-velocity clouds around the Andromeda Galaxy,

    T. Westmeier, C. Br ¨uns, and J. Kerp, “Relics of structure formation: extra-planar gas and high-velocity clouds around the Andromeda Galaxy,” MNRAS 390, 1691–1709 (2008)

    2008

  27. [35]

    High-Velocity Clouds in M 83 and M 51,

    E. D. Miller and J. N. Bregman, “High-Velocity Clouds in M 83 and M 51,” in Extra-Planar Gas, R. Braun, Ed., Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series331, 261 (2005)

    2005

  28. [36]

    High-Velocity Clouds in the Nearby Spiral Galaxy M 83,

    E. D. Miller, J. N. Bregman, and B. P. Wakker, “High-Velocity Clouds in the Nearby Spiral Galaxy M 83,” ApJ 692, 470–491 (2009)

    2009

  29. [37]

    DIISC-I: The Discovery of Kinematically Anomalous H I Clouds in M 100,

    H. B. Gim, S. Borthakur, E. Momjian, et al. , “DIISC-I: The Discovery of Kinematically Anomalous H I Clouds in M 100,” ApJ 922, 69 (2021)

    2021

  30. [38]

    High-Velocity Gas in M101,

    T. van der Hulst and R. Sancisi, “High-Velocity Gas in M101,” AJ 95, 1354 (1988). 41

    1988

  31. [39]

    A New, Kinematically Anomalous H I Compo- nent in the Spiral Galaxy NGC 2403,

    F. Fraternali, T. Oosterloo, R. Sancisi, et al., “A New, Kinematically Anomalous H I Compo- nent in the Spiral Galaxy NGC 2403,” ApJL 562, L47–L50 (2001)

    2001

  32. [40]

    Kinematics of the extended HI disk of NGC 628. High velocity gas and deviations from circular rotation.,

    J. Kamphuis and F. Briggs, “Kinematics of the extended HI disk of NGC 628. High velocity gas and deviations from circular rotation.,” A&A 253, 335–348 (1992)

    1992

  33. [41]

    Widespread high velocity gas in the spiral galaxy NGC 6946.,

    J. Kamphuis and R. Sancisi, “Widespread high velocity gas in the spiral galaxy NGC 6946.,” A&A 273, L31–L34 (1993)

    1993

  34. [42]

    HI holes and high-velocity clouds in the spiral galaxy NGC 6946,

    R. Boomsma, T. A. Oosterloo, F. Fraternali, et al., “HI holes and high-velocity clouds in the spiral galaxy NGC 6946,” A&A 490, 555–570 (2008)

    2008

  35. [43]

    The Cold Gaseous Halo of NGC 891,

    T. Oosterloo, F. Fraternali, and R. Sancisi, “The Cold Gaseous Halo of NGC 891,” AJ 134, 1019 (2007)

    2007

  36. [44]

    The Westerbork Hydrogen Accretion in LOcal GAlaxieS (HALOGAS) survey. I. Survey description and pilot observations,

    G. Heald, G. J ´ozsa, P. Serra,et al., “The Westerbork Hydrogen Accretion in LOcal GAlaxieS (HALOGAS) survey. I. Survey description and pilot observations,”A&A 526, A118 (2011)

    2011

  37. [45]

    Far-ultraviolet Dust Extinction and Molecular Hydrogen in the Diffuse Milky Way Interstellar Medium,

    D. Van De Putte, S. I. B. Cartledge, K. D. Gordon, et al., “Far-ultraviolet Dust Extinction and Molecular Hydrogen in the Diffuse Milky Way Interstellar Medium,”ApJ 944, 33 (2023)

    2023

  38. [46]

    A Far Ultraviolet Spectroscopic Explorer Survey of Interstellar Molecular Hydrogen in the Galactic Disk,

    J. M. Shull, C. W. Danforth, and K. L. Anderson, “A Far Ultraviolet Spectroscopic Explorer Survey of Interstellar Molecular Hydrogen in the Galactic Disk,” ApJ 911, 55 (2021)

    2021

  39. [47]

    FUSE Survey of Interstellar Molecular Hydro- gen Toward 45 High-Latitude AGN,

    K. Gillmon, J. M. Shull, C. Danforth, et al., “FUSE Survey of Interstellar Molecular Hydro- gen Toward 45 High-Latitude AGN,” in Astrophysics in the Far Ultraviolet: Five Years of Discovery with FUSE, G. Sonneborn, H. W. Moos, and B. G. Andersson, Eds.,Astronomical Society of ...

    2006

  40. [48]

    Interstellar H2 in M 33 detected with FUSE,

    H. Bluhm, K. S. de Boer, O. Marggraf, et al., “Interstellar H2 in M 33 detected with FUSE,” A&A 398, 983–991 (2003)

    2003

  41. [49]

    A Far Ultraviolet Spectroscopic Explorer Survey of Interstellar Molecular Hydrogen in the Small and Large Magellanic Clouds,

    J. Tumlinson, J. M. Shull, B. L. Rachford, et al., “A Far Ultraviolet Spectroscopic Explorer Survey of Interstellar Molecular Hydrogen in the Small and Large Magellanic Clouds,” ApJ 566, 857–879 (2002)

    2002

  42. [50]

    H 2, HD, and CO at the edge of 30 Dor in the LMC: The line of sight to Sk-69 246,

    H. Bluhm and K. S. de Boer, “H 2, HD, and CO at the edge of 30 Dor in the LMC: The line of sight to Sk-69 246,” A&A 379, 82–89 (2001)

    2001

  43. [51]

    Far-Ultraviolet Observations of Molecular Hydrogen in the Diffuse Interstellar Medium of Starburst Galaxies,

    C. G. Hoopes, K. R. Sembach, T. M. Heckman, et al. , “Far-Ultraviolet Observations of Molecular Hydrogen in the Diffuse Interstellar Medium of Starburst Galaxies,” ApJ 612, 825–836 (2004)

    2004

  44. [52]

    Molecular Gas within the Milky Way’s Nuclear Wind,

    F. H. Cashman, A. J. Fox, B. D. Savage, et al. , “Molecular Gas within the Milky Way’s Nuclear Wind,” ApJL 923, L11 (2021)

    2021

  45. [53]

    Molecular Hydrogen in High-Velocity Clouds,

    P. Richter, K. R. Sembach, B. P. Wakker, et al. , “Molecular Hydrogen in High-Velocity Clouds,” ApJL 562, L181–L184 (2001)

    2001

  46. [54]

    Discovery of molecular hydrogen in a high- velocity cloud of the Galactic halo,

    P. Richter, K. S. de Boer, H. Widmann, et al., “Discovery of molecular hydrogen in a high- velocity cloud of the Galactic halo,” nature 402, 386–387 (1999)

    1999

  47. [55]

    FUSE Observations of Atomic Abundances and Molecular Hydrogen in the Leading Arm of the Magellanic Stream,

    K. R. Sembach, J. C. Howk, B. D. Savage,et al., “FUSE Observations of Atomic Abundances and Molecular Hydrogen in the Leading Arm of the Magellanic Stream,” AJ 121, 992–1002 (2001). 43

    2001

  48. [56]

    A FUSE Survey of High-Latitude Galactic Molecular Hydrogen,

    B. P. Wakker, “A FUSE Survey of High-Latitude Galactic Molecular Hydrogen,” ApJS 163, 282–305 (2006)

    2006

  49. [57]

    A Detection of H 2 in a High-velocity Cloud toward the Large Magellanic Cloud,

    K. Tchernyshyov, “A Detection of H 2 in a High-velocity Cloud toward the Large Magellanic Cloud,” ApJ 931, 78 (2022)

    2022

  50. [59]

    Tracing the Milky Way Nuclear Wind with 21cm Atomic Hydrogen Emission,

    F. J. Lockman and N. M. McClure-Griffiths, “Tracing the Milky Way Nuclear Wind with 21cm Atomic Hydrogen Emission,” ApJ 826, 215 (2016)

    2016

  51. [60]

    Cold gas in the Milky Way’s nuclear wind,

    E. M. Di Teodoro, N. M. McClure-Griffiths, F. J. Lockman, et al., “Cold gas in the Milky Way’s nuclear wind,”nature 584, 364–367 (2020)

    2020

  52. [61]

    Observation of Acceleration of H I Clouds within the Fermi Bubbles,

    F. J. Lockman, E. M. Di Teodoro, and N. M. McClure-Griffiths, “Observation of Acceleration of H I Clouds within the Fermi Bubbles,” ApJ 888, 51 (2020)

    2020

  53. [62]

    Physical Models of Galaxy Formation in a Cosmological Framework,

    R. S. Somerville and R. Dav ´e, “Physical Models of Galaxy Formation in a Cosmological Framework,” ARAA 53, 51–113 (2015)

    2015

  54. [63]

    The Impact of Starbursts on the Circum- galactic Medium,

    S. Borthakur, T. Heckman, D. Strickland, et al., “The Impact of Starbursts on the Circum- galactic Medium,” ApJ 768, 18 (2013)

    2013

  55. [64]

    COS-burst: Observations of the Impact of Starburst-driven Winds on the Properties of the Circum-galactic Medium,

    T. Heckman, S. Borthakur, V . Wild, et al. , “COS-burst: Observations of the Impact of Starburst-driven Winds on the Properties of the Circum-galactic Medium,” ApJ 846, 151 (2017). 44

    2017

  56. [65]

    Hydrodynamical Simulations of the Galaxy Population: Enduring Successes and Outstanding Challenges,

    R. A. Crain and F. van de V oort, “Hydrodynamical Simulations of the Galaxy Population: Enduring Successes and Outstanding Challenges,” ARAA 61, 473–515 (2023)

    2023

  57. [66]

    The Systematic Properties of the Warm Phase of Starburst-Driven Galactic Winds,

    T. M. Heckman, R. M. Alexandroff, S. Borthakur, et al., “The Systematic Properties of the Warm Phase of Starburst-Driven Galactic Winds,”ApJ 809, 147 (2015)

    2015

  58. [67]

    The Implications of Extreme Outflows from Extreme Starbursts,

    T. M. Heckman and S. Borthakur, “The Implications of Extreme Outflows from Extreme Starbursts,” ApJ 822, 9 (2016)

    2016

  59. [68]

    The Dependence of Galactic Outflows on the Properties and Orientation of zCOSMOS Galaxies at z ˜1,

    R. Bordoloi, S. J. Lilly, E. Hardmeier, et al., “The Dependence of Galactic Outflows on the Properties and Orientation of zCOSMOS Galaxies at z ˜1,” ApJ 794, 130 (2014)

    2014

  60. [69]

    The physics of galactic winds driven by active galactic nuclei,

    C.-A. Faucher-Gigu `ere and E. Quataert, “The physics of galactic winds driven by active galactic nuclei,” MNRAS 425, 605–622 (2012)

    2012

  61. [70]

    Giant Gamma-ray Bubbles from Fermi-LAT: Active Galactic Nucleus Activity or Bipolar Galactic Wind?,

    M. Su, T. R. Slatyer, and D. P. Finkbeiner, “Giant Gamma-ray Bubbles from Fermi-LAT: Active Galactic Nucleus Activity or Bipolar Galactic Wind?,”ApJ 724, 1044–1082 (2010)

    2010

  62. [71]

    The Spectrum and Morphology of the Fermi Bubbles,

    M. Ackermann, A. Albert, W. B. Atwood, et al., “The Spectrum and Morphology of the Fermi Bubbles,” ApJ 793, 64 (2014)

    2014

  63. [72]

    Detection of large-scale X-ray bubbles in the Milky Way halo,

    P. Predehl, R. A. Sunyaev, W. Becker, et al., “Detection of large-scale X-ray bubbles in the Milky Way halo,”nature 588, 227–231 (2020)

    2020

  64. [73]

    The Large-Scale Bipolar Wind in the Galactic Center,

    J. Bland-Hawthorn and M. Cohen, “The Large-Scale Bipolar Wind in the Galactic Center,” ApJ 582, 246–256 (2003)

    2003

  65. [74]

    Microwave Interstellar Medium Emission Observed by the Wilkinson Mi- crowave Anisotropy Probe,

    D. P. Finkbeiner, “Microwave Interstellar Medium Emission Observed by the Wilkinson Mi- crowave Anisotropy Probe,”ApJ 614, 186–193 (2004). 45

    2004

  66. [75]

    Giant magnetized outflows from the centre of the Milky Way,

    E. Carretti, R. M. Crocker, L. Staveley-Smith, et al., “Giant magnetized outflows from the centre of the Milky Way,”nature 493, 66–69 (2013)

    2013

  67. [76]

    Atomic Hydrogen in a Galactic Center Outflow,

    N. M. McClure-Griffiths, J. A. Green, A. S. Hill, et al., “Atomic Hydrogen in a Galactic Center Outflow,” ApJL 770, L4 (2013)

    2013

  68. [77]

    Blowing in the Milky Way Wind: Neutral Hydrogen Clouds Tracing the Galactic Nuclear Outflow,

    E. M. Di Teodoro, N. M. McClure-Griffiths, F. J. Lockman, et al., “Blowing in the Milky Way Wind: Neutral Hydrogen Clouds Tracing the Galactic Nuclear Outflow,” ApJ 855, 33 (2018)

    2018

  69. [78]

    Does the Milky Way Produce a Nuclear Galactic Wind?,

    B. A. Keeney, C. W. Danforth, J. T. Stocke, et al., “Does the Milky Way Produce a Nuclear Galactic Wind?,” ApJ 646, 951–964 (2006)

    2006

  70. [79]

    Probing the Fermi Bubbles in Ultraviolet Ab- sorption: A Spectroscopic Signature of the Milky Way’s Biconical Nuclear Outflow,

    A. J. Fox, R. Bordoloi, B. D. Savage, et al., “Probing the Fermi Bubbles in Ultraviolet Ab- sorption: A Spectroscopic Signature of the Milky Way’s Biconical Nuclear Outflow,” ApJL 799, L7 (2015)

    2015

  71. [80]

    Mapping the Nuclear Outflow of the Milky Way: Studying the Kinematics and Spatial Extent of the Northern Fermi Bubble,

    R. Bordoloi, A. J. Fox, F. J. Lockman, et al., “Mapping the Nuclear Outflow of the Milky Way: Studying the Kinematics and Spatial Extent of the Northern Fermi Bubble,” ApJ 834, 191 (2017)

    2017

  72. [81]

    Probing the Outflowing Multiphase Gas ∼1 kpc below the Galactic Center,

    B. D. Savage, T.-S. Kim, A. J. Fox, et al., “Probing the Outflowing Multiphase Gas ∼1 kpc below the Galactic Center,” ApJS 232, 25 (2017)

    2017

  73. [82]

    Probing the Southern Fermi Bubble in Ultraviolet Absorption Using Distant AGNs,

    T. Karim, A. J. Fox, E. B. Jenkins, et al., “Probing the Southern Fermi Bubble in Ultraviolet Absorption Using Distant AGNs,” ApJ 860, 98 (2018). 46

    2018

  74. [83]

    Mapping Outflowing Gas in the Fermi Bubbles: A UV Absorption Survey of the Galactic Nuclear Wind,

    T. Ashley, A. J. Fox, E. B. Jenkins, et al., “Mapping Outflowing Gas in the Fermi Bubbles: A UV Absorption Survey of the Galactic Nuclear Wind,”ApJ 898, 128 (2020)

    2020

  75. [84]

    Diverse metallicities of Fermi bubble clouds indicate dual origins in the disk and halo,

    T. Ashley, A. J. Fox, F. H. Cashman, et al., “Diverse metallicities of Fermi bubble clouds indicate dual origins in the disk and halo,” Nature Astronomy 6, 968–975 (2022)

    2022

  76. [85]

    X-ray bubbles in the circumgalactic medium of TNG50 Milky Way- and M31-like galaxies: signposts of supermassive black hole activity,

    A. Pillepich, D. Nelson, N. Truong, et al., “X-ray bubbles in the circumgalactic medium of TNG50 Milky Way- and M31-like galaxies: signposts of supermassive black hole activity,” MNRAS 508, 4667–4695 (2021)

    2021

  77. [86]

    Evidence of Fermi bubbles around M31,

    M. S. Pshirkov, V . V . Vasiliev, and K. A. Postnov, “Evidence of Fermi bubbles around M31,” MNRAS 459, L76–L80 (2016)

    2016

  78. [87]

    Far-Ultraviolet Spectroscopic Explorer Detection of Diffuse Galactic O VI Emission toward the Coma and Virgo Clusters,

    W. V . D. Dixon, S. Sallmen, M. Hurwitz, et al. , “Far-Ultraviolet Spectroscopic Explorer Detection of Diffuse Galactic O VI Emission toward the Coma and Virgo Clusters,” ApJL 552, L69–L72 (2001)

    2001

  79. [88]

    Observations of O VI Emission from the Diffuse Interstellar Medium,

    R. L. Shelton, J. W. Kruk, E. M. Murphy, et al., “Observations of O VI Emission from the Diffuse Interstellar Medium,” ApJ 560, 730–741 (2001)

    2001

  80. [89]

    Differential Rotation and Turbulence in Extended H I Disks,

    J. A. Sellwood and S. A. Balbus, “Differential Rotation and Turbulence in Extended H I Disks,” ApJ 511, 660–665 (1999)

    1999

  81. [90]

    Revised Catalog of GALEX Ultraviolet Sources. I. The All-Sky Survey: GUVcat AIS,

    L. Bianchi, B. Shiao, and D. Thilker, “Revised Catalog of GALEX Ultraviolet Sources. I. The All-Sky Survey: GUVcat AIS,” ApJS 230, 24 (2017)

    2017

  82. [91]

    Abolfathi, D

    B. Abolfathi, D. S. Aguado, G. Aguilar, et al., “The Fourteenth Data Release of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey: First Spectroscopic Data from the Extended Baryon Oscillation Spectro- 47 scopic Survey and from the Second Phase of the Apache Point Observatory Galactic Evolu- tion ...

    2018

  83. [92]

    The Fermi Haze: A Gamma-ray Counterpart to the Microwave Haze,

    G. Dobler, D. P. Finkbeiner, I. Cholis, et al., “The Fermi Haze: A Gamma-ray Counterpart to the Microwave Haze,”ApJ 717, 825–842 (2010)

    2010

  84. [93]

    The Physical Nature of Starburst- driven Galactic Outflows,

    E. E. Schneider, E. C. Ostriker, B. E. Robertson, et al., “The Physical Nature of Starburst- driven Galactic Outflows,”ApJ 895, 43 (2020)

    2020

  85. [94]

    The Million Quasars (Milliquas) Catalogue, v8,

    E. W. Flesch, “The Million Quasars (Milliquas) Catalogue, v8,” The Open Journal of Astro- physics 6 (2023)

    2023

  86. [95]

    Neutral Atomic Phases of the Interstellar Medium in the Galaxy,

    M. G. Wolfire, C. F. McKee, D. Hollenbach, et al., “Neutral Atomic Phases of the Interstellar Medium in the Galaxy,” ApJ 587, 278–311 (2003)

    2003

  87. [96]

    DIISC-VI (COS-DIISC): Ultraviolet Metal Absorption Relative to the H I Disk of Galaxies,

    B. Koplitz, S. Borthakur, T. Heckman, et al., “DIISC-VI (COS-DIISC): Ultraviolet Metal Absorption Relative to the H I Disk of Galaxies,” ApJ 982, 171 (2025)

    2025

  88. [97]

    Caught in the Act: A Metal-rich High-velocity Cloud in the Inner Galaxy,

    F. H. Cashman, A. J. Fox, B. P. Wakker,et al., “Caught in the Act: A Metal-rich High-velocity Cloud in the Inner Galaxy,” ApJ 944, 65 (2023)

    2023

  89. [98]

    Constraining Circumgalactic Turbulence with QSO Absorption Line Measurements,

    B. Koplitz, I. , Edward Buie, and E. Scannapieco, “Constraining Circumgalactic Turbulence with QSO Absorption Line Measurements,” ApJ 956, 54 (2023). Sanchayeeta Borthakur is an Associate Professor at Arizona State University. She received her Ph.D. degree in astronomy from th...

    2023

  90. [3432]

    A similar setup can be imagined for other nearby galaxies

    The red squares denote 1 ′′ slitlets of the MOS (not to scale) and the yellow circles mark the position of the background UV-bright QSOs. A similar setup can be imagined for other nearby galaxies. At a distance of 12 Mpc, a MOS with6′ ×6′ FOV will cover a region of 22 kpc × 22...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.