pith. sign in

arxiv: 2506.12300 · v2 · submitted 2025-06-14 · ❄️ cond-mat.quant-gas

Trion formation and ordering in the attractive SU(3) Fermi-Hubbard model

Jonathan Stepp , Eduardo Ibarra-Garc\'ia-Padilla , Richard T. Scalettar , Kaden R. A. Hazzard This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 09:56 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.quant-gas
keywords SU(3) Fermi-Hubbard modeltrion liquidcharge density wavedeterminant quantum Monte Carloattractive interactionsFermi liquidquantum phase transitionpolar molecules
0
0 comments X p. Extension

The pith

The attractive SU(3) Fermi-Hubbard model on a square lattice features a trion liquid region and a charge density wave that remains stable at finite temperatures.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper investigates the attractive version of the SU(3) Fermi-Hubbard model, which describes fermions with three internal states interacting attractively on a square lattice. Using determinant quantum Monte Carlo simulations, the authors map out the finite-temperature behavior and identify three main regions in the phase diagram: a conventional three-component Fermi liquid, a liquid of trions where three fermions form bound states, and an ordered charge density wave phase. The charge density wave is found to be stable against thermal fluctuations at nonzero temperatures, in contrast to the two-component case. The transition from the Fermi liquid to the trion liquid with decreasing temperature or increasing attraction suggests the presence of a quantum phase transition at absolute zero. These findings are relevant for ongoing experiments with ultracold polar molecules that can realize SU(N) symmetric interactions.

Core claim

Using the Determinant Quantum Monte Carlo method, we explore the finite-temperature phase diagram and provide evidence for three distinct regions — a three-component Fermi liquid (FL) region, a 'trion' liquid (TL) region, and an ordered Charge Density Wave (CDW) phase. The CDW phase is stable at finite temperature (in contrast to the SU(2) CDW), while the FL to TL crossover appears to point to a quantum phase transition at zero temperature.

What carries the argument

Trion formation, the binding of three fermions of different components into a composite particle that organizes the system into Fermi liquid, trion liquid, and charge density wave regimes.

If this is right

  • The charge density wave phase remains stable at finite temperatures unlike in the SU(2) case.
  • The Fermi liquid to trion liquid crossover points to a quantum phase transition at zero temperature.
  • The determinant quantum Monte Carlo method extends directly to larger even values of N without a sign problem.
  • Polar molecules offer a tunable platform to realize and probe the attractive SU(N) Fermi-Hubbard model.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The trion liquid may display distinctive pairing correlations or response functions that differ from ordinary Fermi liquids.
  • Direct imaging of density modulations in molecular gases could confirm the finite-temperature charge density wave.
  • Similar trion binding and ordering could appear in other multi-component attractive lattice models beyond square geometry.

Load-bearing premise

The finite-temperature crossover from the Fermi liquid to the trion liquid is assumed to indicate a true quantum phase transition at zero temperature.

What would settle it

A finite-size scaling study showing the crossover temperature extrapolates to zero or the charge density wave order parameter vanishing at any positive temperature would falsify the central claims.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.12300 by Eduardo Ibarra-Garc\'ia-Padilla, Jonathan Stepp, Kaden R. A. Hazzard, Richard T. Scalettar.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Finite temperature phase diagram at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Difference susceptibility, isothermal compressibility [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Heat capacity, difference susceptibility, and struc [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. The invariant correlation ratio for different lattice [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. The CDW structure factor at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Recent advances in microwave shielding have increased the stability and control of large numbers of polar molecules, allowing for the first realization of a molecular Bose-Einstein condensate. Remarkably, it was also recently realized that shielded polar molecules exhibit an SU(N) symmetry among their hyperfine states, opening the door to SU(N) systems with larger N, bosonic particle statistics, and tunable interactions -- both repulsive and attractive. Motivated by these results, we have studied the SU(3) attractive Fermi-Hubbard model (FHM) on a square lattice. Using the Determinant Quantum Monte Carlo (DQMC) method, we explore the finite-temperature phase diagram and provide evidence for three distinct regions -- a three-component Fermi liquid (FL) region, a "trion" liquid (TL) region, and an ordered Charge Density Wave (CDW) phase. The CDW phase is stable at finite temperature (in contrast to the SU(2) CDW), while the FL to TL crossover appears to point to a quantum phase transition at zero temperature. Our method extends straightforwardly to larger N and is sign-problem free for even values of N. With these results, we demonstrate the potential physics enabled by using polar molecules as a quantum simulation platform for the attractive SU(N) FHM.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates the attractive SU(3) Fermi-Hubbard model on the square lattice using Determinant Quantum Monte Carlo simulations. It reports evidence for three regions in the finite-temperature phase diagram: a three-component Fermi liquid (FL), a trion liquid (TL), and an ordered charge density wave (CDW) phase. The CDW is stated to remain stable at finite temperature (unlike the SU(2) case), while the FL-TL crossover is interpreted as indicating a quantum phase transition at T=0. The approach is sign-problem free for even N and extends to larger N, motivated by polar-molecule platforms.

Significance. If the central claims are confirmed with proper scaling, the work is significant for mapping out SU(N) attractive Hubbard physics accessible to quantum simulators. The finite-T stability of the CDW and the potential QPT highlight features unique to N=3, while the sign-problem-free DQMC for even N provides a reproducible numerical route that strengthens the results.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract and phase-diagram results section] The interpretation that the FL-to-TL crossover points to a T=0 quantum phase transition (abstract and results section on the phase diagram) is load-bearing for the claimed three-region structure but rests on finite-T DQMC data. Smooth crossovers are expected on finite lattices; the manuscript must supply explicit finite-size scaling of susceptibilities (e.g., trion density or pairing correlator) or data collapse as T→0 or L→∞ to establish a true QPT rather than a crossover. This quantitative extrapolation is not detailed in the provided evidence.
minor comments (2)
  1. Figure captions and main-text discussion of the phase diagram should explicitly state the lattice sizes, temperatures, and error-bar conventions used to delineate the three regions.
  2. A brief comparison table or paragraph contrasting the SU(3) CDW stability with the SU(2) case would clarify the novelty without altering the central claims.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive feedback on our manuscript. We address the major comment below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate additional analysis as requested.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and phase-diagram results section] The interpretation that the FL-to-TL crossover points to a T=0 quantum phase transition (abstract and results section on the phase diagram) is load-bearing for the claimed three-region structure but rests on finite-T DQMC data. Smooth crossovers are expected on finite lattices; the manuscript must supply explicit finite-size scaling of susceptibilities (e.g., trion density or pairing correlator) or data collapse as T→0 or L→∞ to establish a true QPT rather than a crossover. This quantitative extrapolation is not detailed in the provided evidence.

    Authors: We agree that a definitive identification of a T=0 quantum phase transition requires quantitative finite-size scaling beyond the finite-temperature trends we have presented. Our DQMC data show that the FL-TL crossover sharpens with decreasing temperature and increasing system size, with the trion density and associated pairing correlators exhibiting behavior consistent with a quantum critical point separating the two phases. Nevertheless, we acknowledge that this remains an inference rather than a completed extrapolation. In the revised manuscript we will add explicit finite-size scaling analysis of the trion susceptibility and pairing correlator, together with data-collapse studies where the data permit, and we will update the discussion in the phase-diagram section and the abstract to reflect this strengthened evidence. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: direct DQMC simulation of the model Hamiltonian

full rationale

The paper performs Determinant Quantum Monte Carlo simulations of the attractive SU(3) Fermi-Hubbard Hamiltonian on a square lattice. The reported regions (three-component Fermi liquid, trion liquid, and finite-temperature CDW order) are identified from computed observables such as densities, susceptibilities, and correlation functions. No derivation step reduces a claimed result to a quantity defined by the same simulation output, no parameters are fitted and then relabeled as predictions, and no load-bearing premise rests on a self-citation chain. The interpretation that the FL-TL crossover signals a T=0 quantum phase transition is an extrapolation from finite-T data rather than a definitional or self-referential step. The work is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claims rest on the standard attractive SU(3) Fermi-Hubbard Hamiltonian on the square lattice and the applicability of DQMC to extract finite-temperature observables; no additional free parameters beyond conventional Hubbard U, filling, and temperature are introduced in the abstract.

free parameters (2)
  • interaction strength U
    Standard tunable parameter of the Hubbard model; varied across simulations to locate phase boundaries.
  • particle filling
    Density at which CDW order is reported; chosen to highlight the ordered phase.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The shielded polar molecules realize an attractive SU(3) Fermi-Hubbard model on a square lattice.
    Invoked in the motivation and conclusion to connect the lattice model to experimental platforms.
  • standard math Determinant quantum Monte Carlo provides accurate finite-temperature thermodynamics for the model without sign problem for N=3.
    Relies on the known properties of the DQMC algorithm for fermionic Hubbard models.
invented entities (1)
  • trion liquid no independent evidence
    purpose: To label the phase in which three fermions form bound states that behave as a liquid.
    Introduced to describe simulation results; no independent experimental signature is provided in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5783 in / 1805 out tokens · 39665 ms · 2026-05-19T09:56:27.798027+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

65 extracted references · 65 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Affleck and J

    I. Affleck and J. B. Marston, Large- n limit of the Heisenberg-Hubbard model: Implications for high- Tc su- perconductors, Phys. Rev. B 37, 3774 (1988)

    work page 1988

  2. [2]

    Read and S

    N. Read and S. Sachdev, Some features of the phase dia- gram of the square lattice SU( N ) antiferromagnet, Nucl. Phys. 316, 609 (1989)

    work page 1989

  3. [3]

    Sachdev, Large- N limit of the square-lattice t-J model at 1/4 and other filling fractions, Phys

    S. Sachdev, Large- N limit of the square-lattice t-J model at 1/4 and other filling fractions, Phys. Rev. B 41, 4502 (1990)

    work page 1990

  4. [4]

    Honerkamp and W

    C. Honerkamp and W. Hofstetter, BCS pairing in Fermi systems with N different hyperfine states, Phys. Rev. B 70, 094521 (2004)

    work page 2004

  5. [5]

    Honerkamp and W

    C. Honerkamp and W. Hofstetter, Ultracold fermions and the SU( N ) Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 170403 (2004)

    work page 2004

  6. [6]

    C. Wu, J. Hu, and S. Zhang, Exact SO(5) symmetry in the spin-3 /2 fermionic system, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 186402 (2003)

    work page 2003

  7. [7]

    A. V. Gorshkov, M. Hermele, V. Gurarie, C. Xu, P. S. Julienne, J. Ye, P. Zoller, E. Demler, M. D. Lukin, and A. M. Rey, Two-orbital SU(N) magnetism with ultracold alkaline-earth atoms, Nat. Phys. 6, 289 (2010)

    work page 2010

  8. [8]

    M. A. Cazalilla and A. M. Rey, Ultracold Fermi gases with emergent SU( N ) symmetry, Rep. Prog. Phys. 77, 124401 (2014)

    work page 2014

  9. [9]

    C. He, E. Hajiyev, Z. Ren, B. Song, and G.-B. Jo, Recent progresses of ultracold two-electron atoms, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 52, 102001 (2019)

    work page 2019

  10. [10]

    S. Taie, R. Yamazaki, S. Sugawa, and Y. Takahashi, An SU(6) Mott insulator of an atomic Fermi gas realized by large-spin Pomeranchuk cooling, Nat. Phys. 8, 825 (2012)

    work page 2012

  11. [11]

    Hofrichter, L

    C. Hofrichter, L. Riegger, F. Scazza, M. H¨ ofer, D. R. Fernandes, I. Bloch, and S. F¨ olling, Direct probing of the Mott crossover in the SU( N ) Fermi-Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. X 6, 021030 (2016)

    work page 2016

  12. [12]

    Pasqualetti, O

    G. Pasqualetti, O. Bettermann, N. Darkwah Oppong, E. Ibarra-Garc ´ ıa-Padilla, S. Dasgupta, R. T. Scalettar, K. R. A. Hazzard, I. Bloch, and S. F¨ olling, Equation of state and thermometry of the 2D SU( N ) Fermi-Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 083401 (2024)

    work page 2024

  13. [13]

    D. Tusi, L. Franchi, L. F. Livi, K. Baumann, D. Bene- dicto Orenes, L. Del Re, R. E. Barfknecht, T.-W. Zhou, M. Inguscio, G. Cappellini, M. Capone, J. Catani, and L. Fallani, Flavour-selective localization in interacting lattice fermions, Nat. Phys. 18, 1201 (2022)

    work page 2022

  14. [14]

    S. Taie, E. Ibarra-Garc ´ ıa-Padilla, N. Nishizawa, Y. Takasu, Y. Kuno, H.-T. Wei, R. T. Scalettar, K. R. A. Hazzard, and Y. Takahashi, Observation of antiferromag- netic correlations in an ultracold SU( N ) Hubbard model, Nat. Phys. 18, 1356 (2022)

    work page 2022

  15. [15]

    Hermele, V

    M. Hermele, V. Gurarie, and A. M. Rey, Mott insulators of ultracold fermionic alkaline earth atoms: Undercon- strained magnetism and chiral spin liquid, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 135301 (2009)

    work page 2009

  16. [16]

    D. Wang, Y. Li, Z. Cai, Z. Zhou, Y. Wang, and C. Wu, Competing orders in the 2D half-filled SU(2 N ) Hubbard model through the pinning field quantum Monte-Carlo simulations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 156403 (2014)

    work page 2014

  17. [17]

    Z. Zhou, D. Wang, Z. Y. Meng, Y. Wang, and C. Wu, Mott insulating states and quantum phase transitions of correlated SU(2 N ) Dirac fermions, Phys. Rev. B 93, 245157 (2016)

    work page 2016

  18. [18]

    S. Xu, J. T. Barreiro, Y. Wang, and C. Wu, Interaction effects with varying N in SU( N ) symmetric fermion lat- tice systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 167205 (2018)

    work page 2018

  19. [19]

    Unukovych and A

    V. Unukovych and A. Sotnikov, SU (4)-symmetric Hub- bard model at quarter filling: Insights from the dynami- cal mean-field approach, Physical Review B 104, 245106 (2021). 6

    work page 2021

  20. [20]

    Ibarra-Garc ´ ıa-Padilla, S

    E. Ibarra-Garc ´ ıa-Padilla, S. Dasgupta, H.-T. Wei, S. Taie, Y. Takahashi, R. T. Scalettar, and K. R. A. Hazzard, Universal thermodynamics of an SU( N ) Fermi- Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. A 104, 043316 (2021)

    work page 2021

  21. [21]

    R. R. P. Singh and J. Oitmaa, Finite-temperature strong- coupling expansions for the SU( N ) Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. A 105, 033317 (2022)

    work page 2022

  22. [22]

    Ibarra-Garc ´ ıa-Padilla, C

    E. Ibarra-Garc ´ ıa-Padilla, C. Feng, G. Pasqualetti, S. F¨ olling, R. T. Scalettar, E. Khatami, and K. R. A. Hazzard, Metal-insulator transition and magnetism of SU(3) fermions in the square lattice, Phys. Rev. A 108, 053312 (2023)

    work page 2023

  23. [23]

    C. Feng, E. Ibarra-Garc ´ ıa-Padilla, K. R. A. Hazzard, R. Scalettar, S. Zhang, and E. Vitali, Metal-insulator transition and quantum magnetism in the SU(3) Fermi- Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 043267 (2023)

    work page 2023

  24. [24]

    Botzung and P

    T. Botzung and P. Nataf, Exact diagonalization of SU( N ) Fermi-Hubbard models, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 153001 (2024)

    work page 2024

  25. [25]

    Kozik, Combinatorial summation of Feynman dia- grams, Nat

    E. Kozik, Combinatorial summation of Feynman dia- grams, Nat. Commun. 15, 7916 (2024)

    work page 2024

  26. [26]

    Schl¨ omer, F

    H. Schl¨ omer, F. Grusdt, U. Schollw¨ ock, K. R. A. Haz- zard, and A. Bohrdt, Subdimensional magnetic polarons in the one-hole doped SU(3) t-J model, Phys. Rev. B 110, 125134 (2024)

    work page 2024

  27. [27]

    Ibarra-Garc ´ ıa-Padilla and S

    E. Ibarra-Garc ´ ıa-Padilla and S. Choudhury, Many-body physics of ultracold alkaline-earth atoms with SU( N )- symmetric interactions, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 37, 083003 (2024)

    work page 2024

  28. [28]

    T. B. Ottenstein, T. Lompe, M. Kohnen, A. N. Wenz, and S. Jochim, Collisional stability of a three-component degenerate Fermi gas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 203202 (2008)

    work page 2008

  29. [29]

    ´A. Rapp, W. Hofstetter, and G. Zar´ and, Trionic phase of ultracold fermions in an optical lattice: A variational study, Phys. Rev. B 77, 144520 (2008)

    work page 2008

  30. [31]

    M. O. Soldini, M. H. Fischer, and T. Neupert, Charge- 4e superconductivity in a Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B 109, 214509 (2024)

    work page 2024

  31. [32]

    Naidon and S

    P. Naidon and S. Endo, Efimov physics: A review, Rep. Prog. Phys. 80, 056001 (2017)

    work page 2017

  32. [33]

    Floerchinger, R

    S. Floerchinger, R. Schmidt, S. Moroz, and C. Wetterich, Functional renormalization for trion formation in ultra- cold fermion gases, Phys. Rev. A 79, 013603 (2009)

    work page 2009

  33. [34]

    Nishida, New type of crossover physics in three- component Fermi gases, Phys

    Y. Nishida, New type of crossover physics in three- component Fermi gases, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 240401 (2012)

    work page 2012

  34. [35]

    Pohlmann, A

    J. Pohlmann, A. Privitera, I. Titvinidze, and W. Hofstet- ter, Trion and dimer formation in three-color fermions, Phys. Rev. A 87, 023617 (2013)

    work page 2013

  35. [36]

    ´A. Rapp, G. Zar´ and, C. Honerkamp, and W. Hofstetter, Color superfluidity and “baryon” formation in ultracold fermions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 160405 (2007)

    work page 2007

  36. [37]

    Valtolina, K

    G. Valtolina, K. Matsuda, W. G. Tobias, J.-R. Li, L. De Marco, and J. Ye, Dipolar evaporation of reac- tive molecules to below the Fermi temperature, Nature 588, 239 (2020)

    work page 2020

  37. [38]

    Karman and J

    T. Karman and J. M. Hutson, Microwave shielding of ultracold polar molecules, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 163401 (2018)

    work page 2018

  38. [39]

    Schindewolf, R

    A. Schindewolf, R. Bause, X.-Y. Chen, M. Duda, T. Kar- man, I. Bloch, and X.-Y. Luo, Evaporation of microwave- shielded polar molecules to quantum degeneracy, Nature 607, 677 (2022)

    work page 2022

  39. [40]

    Bigagli, W

    N. Bigagli, W. Yuan, S. Zhang, B. Bulatovic, T. Kar- man, I. Stevenson, and S. Will, Observation of Bose- Einstein condensation of dipolar molecules, Nature 631, 289 (2024)

    work page 2024

  40. [41]

    Mukherjee, J

    B. Mukherjee, J. M. Hutson, and K. R. A. Hazzard, SU(N ) magnetism with ultracold molecules, New J. Phys. 27, 013013 (2025)

    work page 2025

  41. [42]

    Mukherjee and J

    B. Mukherjee and J. M. Hutson, SU( N ) symmetry with ultracold alkali dimers: Weak dependence of scattering properties on hyperfine state, Phys. Rev. Research 7, 013099 (2025)

    work page 2025

  42. [43]

    S. L. Cornish, M. R. Tarbutt, and K. R. A. Hazzard, Quantum computation and quantum simulation with ul- tracold molecules, Nat. Phys. 20, 730 (2024)

    work page 2024

  43. [44]

    Blankenbecler, D

    R. Blankenbecler, D. J. Scalapino, and R. L. Sugar, Monte Carlo calculations of coupled boson-fermion sys- tems. I, Phys. Rev. D 24, 2278 (1981)

    work page 1981

  44. [46]

    See Supplemental Material at URL-will-be-inserted-by- publisher for information on the DQMC algorithm, our approximations of κ in the two limits, details of our finite- size extrapolation, an analysis of various error sources and a description of the invariant correlation ratio

    work page

  45. [47]

    Titvinidze, A

    I. Titvinidze, A. Privitera, S.-Y. Chang, S. Diehl, M. A. Baranov, A. Daley, and W. Hofstetter, Magnetism and domain formation in SU(3)-symmetric multi-species Fermi mixtures, New J. Phys. 13, 035013 (2011)

    work page 2011

  46. [48]

    Binder, Finite size scaling analysis of Ising model block distribution functions, Z

    K. Binder, Finite size scaling analysis of Ising model block distribution functions, Z. Phys. B 43, 119 (1981)

    work page 1981

  47. [49]

    R. K. Kaul, Spin nematics, valence-bond solids, and spi n liquids in SO( N ) quantum spin models on the triangular lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 157202 (2015)

    work page 2015

  48. [50]

    R. T. Scalettar, E. Y. Loh, J. E. Gubernatis, A. Moreo, S. R. White, D. J. Scalapino, R. L. Sugar, and E. Dagotto, Phase diagram of the two-dimensional negative-U Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 1407 (1989)

    work page 1989

  49. [51]

    Moreo and D

    A. Moreo and D. J. Scalapino, Two-dimensional negative- U Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 946 (1991)

    work page 1991

  50. [52]

    Paiva, R

    T. Paiva, R. R. dos Santos, R. T. Scalettar, and P. J. H. Denteneer, Critical temperature for the two-dimensional attractive Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B 69, 184501 (2004)

    work page 2004

  51. [53]

    N. D. Mermin and H. Wagner, Absence of ferromag- netism or antiferromagnetism in one- or two-dimensional isotropic Heisenberg models, Phys. Rev. Lett. 17, 1133 (1966)

    work page 1966

  52. [54]

    Paiva, R

    T. Paiva, R. T. Scalettar, C. Huscroft, and A. K. McMa- han, Signatures of spin and charge energy scales in the local moment and specific heat of the half-filled two- dimensional Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B 63, 125116 (2001)

    work page 2001

  53. [55]

    Inaba and S.-i

    K. Inaba and S.-i. Suga, Finite-temperature properties of attractive three-component fermionic atoms in optical lattices, Phys. Rev. A 80, 041602 (2009)

    work page 2009

  54. [56]

    Color Superfluid and Trionic State of Attractive Three-Component Lattice Fermionic Atoms at Finite Temperatures

    K. Inaba and S.-i. Suga, Color superfluid and trionic state of attractive three-component lattice fermionic atoms at 7 finite temperatures, Mod. Phys. Lett. B 25, 987 (2011), 1009.0040 [cond-mat, physics:nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  55. [57]

    J. M. Kosterlitz and D. J. Thouless, Ordering, metasta- bility and phase transitions in two-dimensional systems, J. Phys. C 6, 1181 (1973)

    work page 1973

  56. [58]

    Karman, N

    T. Karman, N. Bigagli, W. Yuan, S. Zhang, I. Steven- son, and S. Will, Double microwave shielding (2025), arXiv:2501.08095 [cond-mat]

    work page arXiv 2025

  57. [59]

    Trion formation and ordering in the attract ive SU(3) Fermi-Hubbard model

    L. Christakis, J. S. Rosenberg, R. Raj, S. Chi, A. Morn- ingstar, D. A. Huse, Z. Z. Yan, and W. S. Bakr, Probing site-resolved correlations in a spin system of ultracold molecules, Nature 614, 64 (2023). Supplemental Material for “Trion formation and ordering in the attract ive SU(3) Fermi-Hubbard model” Jonathan Stepp, 1, ∗ Eduardo Ibarra-Garc ´ ıa-Padil...

    work page 2023

  58. [60]

    D. J. Scalapino and R. L. Sugar, Monte Carlo calculations of coupled boson-fermion systems. II, Phys. Rev. B 24, 4295 (1981)

    work page 1981

  59. [61]

    E. Y. Loh, J. E. Gubernatis, R. T. Scalettar, S. R. White, D. J. Scalapino, and R. L. Sugar, Sign problem in the nu- merical simulation of many-electron systems, Phys. Rev. B 41, 9301 (1990)

    work page 1990

  60. [62]

    Troyer and U.-J

    M. Troyer and U.-J. Wiese, Computational complexity and fundamental limitations to fermionic quantum monte carlo simulations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 170201 (2005)

    work page 2005

  61. [63]

    Mondaini, S

    R. Mondaini, S. Tarat, and R. T. Scalettar, Quantum crit- ical points and the sign problem, Science 375, 418 (2022)

    work page 2022

  62. [64]

    Binder, Finite size scaling analysis of Ising model blo ck distribution functions, Z

    K. Binder, Finite size scaling analysis of Ising model blo ck distribution functions, Z. Phys. B 43, 119 (1981)

    work page 1981

  63. [65]

    R. K. Kaul, Spin nematics, valence-bond solids, and spin liquids in SO( N ) quantum spin models on the triangular lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 157202 (2015)

    work page 2015

  64. [66]

    H. Xu, X. Li, Z. Zhou, X. Wang, L. Wang, C. Wu, and Y. Wang, Trion states and quantum criticality of attrac- tive SU(3) Dirac fermions, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 023180 (2023)

    work page 2023

  65. [67]

    K. L. Lee, K. Bouadim, G. G. Batrouni, F. H´ ebert, R. T. Scalettar, C. Miniatura, and B. Gr´ emaud, Attractive Hub- bard model on a honeycomb lattice: Quantum Monte Carlo study, Phys. Rev. B 80, 245118 (2009)

    work page 2009