Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Gromov-Witten theory of $\mathsf{Hilb}^n(\mathbb{C}^2)$ and Noether-Lefschetz theory of $\mathcal{A}_g$

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Genus-1 Gromov-Witten invariants of the Hilbert scheme of points in the plane are determined by traces of quantum multiplication and match the Noether-Lefschetz theory of abelian varieties.

desk verdict The genus 1 divisor invariant of Hilb^n(C^2) is computed in closed form for all n, with a striking match to Noether-Lefschetz theory; the main caveat is that one load-bearing bridge rests on a patch external to the manuscript. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.12438 v2 pith:PSAUMKT2 submitted 2025-06-14 math.AG

Aitor Iribar Lopez , Rahul Pandharipande , Hsian-Hua Tseng This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.AG MSC 14N3514C0514K10
keywords HilbertschemeGromov-WittentheoryNoether-LefschetzmoduliofabelianvarietiesEisensteinseriesquantumcohomologyHodgeintegralstautologicalprojection
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper calculates the genus 1 Gromov-Witten theory of Hilb^n($C^{2}$), the space of (possibly coincident) n-point configurations in the plane. Its central result is a closed formula for the basic divisor insertion, expressed as a constant times a sum of traces of the operator of quantum multiplication by that divisor, with coefficients given by the divisor-sum function. The same generating function appears in the Noether-Lefschetz geometry of the moduli space of principally polarized abelian varieties, where it describes the tautological projection of special cycle classes. The proof goes through a families version of local Gromov-Witten theory over the moduli space of elliptic curves, where the answer is shown to be an Eisenstein series. It is a complete evaluation of a higher-genus invariant series, and it links curve counting in Hilbert schemes to modular forms and abelian varieties.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the moduli stack of connected stable maps to the fibers of the universal elliptic curve $\pi\colon E \to \overline{\mathcal{M}}_{1,1}$, together with the Hodge bundle on the domain. The argument is carried by three mechanisms: Theorem A of the paper's earlier correspondence, converting genus 1 invariants of Hilb^n($C^{2}$) into families invariants of local elliptic curves; a vanishing statement for maps to the fibers of an elliptically fibered K3 surface, which yields a factorization of the top Hodge class and lets the families Hodge integral be replaced by a fixed elliptic curve invariant; and a connected/disconnected calculus that relates the family invariant to traces of quantum multiplication via the Fock space expression for the quantum multiplication operator. For the full reconstruction, Givental's genus 1 formula for semisimple Frobenius manifolds is used, controlled by a Wronskian determinant whose nondegeneracy is conjectured.

What would settle it

A concrete check would be to compute the Proposition 7 integral by virtual localization for a specific elliptically fibered K3 (for instance, a Weierstrass fibration) at $g=2$ and $n=1$; a nonzero value would falsify the vanishing and hence Theorem 2. Independently, the Wronskian determinant $\det(W)$ used in Theorems 5 and 6 can be evaluated symbolically for $n=8$; a zero would disprove the nondegeneracy conjecture on which the full reconstruction depends.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is that three objects are governed by the same number: the genus 1 Gromov-Witten invariant of Hilb^n($C^{2}$) with a divisor insertion; a families Hodge integral over moduli of stable maps to the universal elliptic curve; and the tautological projection of Noether-Lefschetz cycle classes on the moduli space of principally polarized abelian varieties. Theorem 1 states $\langle D \rangle_1^{\mathrm{Hilb}^n(\mathbb{C}^2)} = -\frac{1}{24}\frac{(t_1+t_2)^2}{t_1 t_2}\bigl( \mathrm{Tr}_n + \sum_{k=2}^{n-1} \sigma_{-1}(n-k) \mathrm{Tr}_k \bigr)$, where $\mathrm{Tr}_k$ is the normalized trace of quantum multiplication by the divisor $D$. Theorem 2 states that the generating series of the families invariants is $\frac{(-1)^g}{24}\frac{|B_{2g}|}{4g}\frac{|B_{2g-2}|}{(2g-2)!} E_{2g}(Q)$, with $E_{2g}$ the Eisenstein series of weight $2g$. The two theorems are equivalent, and Theorem 3 derives the homomorphism property of the tautological projection for the Torelli cycle and the Noether-Lefschetz class.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is Proposition 7: for an elliptically fibered K3 surface, the integral against the Euler class $e\bigl(E_g^\vee \otimes \varepsilon_S^*(\mathrm{Tan}\,\mathbb{P}^1)\bigr)$ over the moduli space of stable maps to the fibers vanishes for genus at least 2 and positive degree $n$; if this vanishing fails, the Eisenstein formula for the families Hodge integral no longer follows.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The genus 1 Gromov-Witten potential of Hilb^n(C^2) is determined, up to genus 0 data and the Wronskian conjecture, by the single series $\langle D \rangle_1^{\mathrm{Hilb}^n(\mathbb{C}^2)}$ together with the quantum multiplication operator $M_D$.
  • The classes $\mathrm{Tor}_*[\mathcal{M}^{\mathrm{ct}}_g]$ and $[\mathrm{NL}_{g,n}]$ satisfy the multiplicative property with respect to the tautological projection: $\mathrm{taut}(\gamma)\cdot\mathrm{taut}(\gamma') = \mathrm{taut}(\gamma\cdot\gamma')$ for these pairs.
  • The generating function of the families Hodge integrals equals an Eisenstein series, giving closed form evaluations in terms of Bernoulli numbers and divisor sums.
  • For $n \le 5$, explicit formulas for all 1-point genus 1 series are listed, providing concrete data for the Hilbert scheme theory.
  • The degree 0 part of the formula matches the Carlsson-Okounkov vertex operator calculations.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • One could expect that the Wronskian nondegeneracy conjecture is a manifestation of the irreducibility of the quantum connection of Hilb^n(C^2), similar in spirit to irreducibility results for quantum $D$-modules; this is not addressed in the paper.
  • The appearance of $E_{2g}(Q)$ suggests that the full higher-genus theory of Hilb^n(C^2) might be expressible in terms of quasimodular forms, as happens for elliptic curves; the paper only proves the genus 1 case.
  • A natural testable extension is to replace $\mathbb{C}^2$ by the minimal resolution of $A_{n-1}$ singularities, where the quantum cohomology is known, and ask whether the same trace-plus-divisor-sum formula holds with coefficients replaced by a root-system dependent function.
  • If the Wronskian conjecture is true, the reconstruction theorem would give a practical algorithm to compute all genus 1 invariants of Hilb^n(C^2) to arbitrary $n$ from the genus 0 data alone.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper computes genus-1 T-equivariant Gromov-Witten invariants of the Hilbert scheme Hilb^n(C^2). Theorem 1 gives an explicit formula for the divisor 1-point invariant <D>_1^{Hilb^n(C^2)} as a universal coefficient -(t1+t2)^2/(24 t1 t2) times a combination of normalized traces Tr_k of quantum multiplication by D, with coefficients sigma_{-1}(n-k). The proof passes through the Pandharipande-Tseng correspondence to the Gromov-Witten theory of families of local elliptic curves over M_{1,1}. In that setting the paper proves Theorem 2, a closed formula for the families Hodge integral <tau_1(p_1) lambda_g lambda_{g-2}>_{g,n}^{pi,circ} whose generating series is (-1)^g/24 |B_{2g}|/(4g) |B_{2g-2}|/(2g-2)! E_{2g}(Q). From this the authors derive, via prior work [23], the homomorphism property for the tautological projection on CH^*(A_g) (Theorem 3). They also prove a reduction of multi-point genus-1 invariants to 1-point series (Theorem 4) and, conditional on a Wronskian nondegeneracy conjecture, a full reconstruction of the genus-1 theory (Theorems 5 and 6). Explicit tables for n up to 5 are included.

Significance. If the arguments are correct, Theorem 1 is the first complete closed-form evaluation of the fundamental genus-1 divisor invariant of Hilb^n(C^2) for all n, and Theorem 2 establishes an elegant Eisenstein-series structure for families Hodge integrals over M_{1,1}. The resulting connection to Noether-Lefschetz cycles on A_g is striking and consequential. The paper is also commendably explicit about its main caveats: Theorems 5 and 6 are conditional on Conjecture 13, verified only for n <= 7, and the key bridge Theorem A rests on a rationality statement whose published proof is acknowledged to have a gap filled only in an external revision. The computations are substantial and the exposition is generally clear, but the two caveats mean that the unconditional central claims are not fully self-contained as submitted.

major comments (3)
  1. [0.3, footnote 7 and Theorem A] The proof of Theorem 1 uses Theorem A to identify the full Hilbert scheme series <D>_1^{Hilb^n(C^2)} with the family series via (0.3). The footnote states that the published proof of rationality of the genus-1 series in [46] has a gap, filled only in an unpublished revision, and asserts that analytic continuation from q=0 to q=-1 is all that is needed. As written, this does not justify Theorem A as an equality of rational functions in q: if the two sides are only known as analytic germs near q=0 or along a continuation path, one cannot conclude equality of rational functions on their full domain without a rationality proof for both sides. Since the coefficient extraction in Section 3.3 uses the full series identity, this is load-bearing for Theorem 1. Please include the missing rationality argument or state precisely the weaker analytic-continuation statement that is actually used and prove that it suffices for (0.3).
  2. [2.5, Eq. (2.5)] The exact sequence 0 -> eps_S^*(Tan P^1) -> E_g -> F -> 0 is the key input for the factorization (2.6), hence for Proposition 7 and for the reduction in Section 2.4 from the K3-family invariant to the fixed elliptic curve invariant. The injectivity of the pull-back map (2.4) is asserted with the single phrase "Since n > 0", and the equality c_{g-1}(F) = lambda_{g-1} is justified only by restricting the sequence to a fiber of eps_S. These identifications are not obvious globally on the moduli space of relative stable maps, especially over the expanded target with simple circuits over the 24 nodal fibers. Please provide a global argument or a precise reference for both statements, since Proposition 7 is the mechanism that makes Theorem 2 follow from the fixed-target evaluation (2.3).
  3. [3.5, proof of Proposition 8] The proof of Proposition 8, which is used in the connected/disconnected calculus leading to Theorem 1, relies on the assertion lambda_g lambda_{g-2} = 2 lambda_{g-1}^2 and on the claim that this insertion annihilates all degeneration graphs except the two configurations in Figure 1. The identity is not proved or cited, and the dimension analysis of the vertex list (3.15)--(3.22) is summarized rather than demonstrated. These steps control the right-hand side of the degeneration formula (3.13), so they are load-bearing for Theorem 1. Please provide a proof or reference for the Hodge-class identity and a more detailed verification of the vanishing and non-vanishing of the listed vertex contributions.
minor comments (4)
  1. [0.5.1, Eq. (0.5)] The displayed formula for Tr_n is typeset without sufficient parentheses: the rational factors ((q)^{mu_i}+1)/((q)^{mu_i}-1) and ((q)+1)/((q)-1) are hard to distinguish from the surrounding terms. Please add parentheses or define the summand explicitly.
  2. [2.4] The equality of the integral over M_{1,1} with 1/48 times the integral over the P^1-base of the K3 fibration is stated without comment. Please justify compatibility of the relative virtual classes under this degree-48 base change or cite a standard statement.
  3. [3.4] The text defines triples (m,k,g) but a few lines later refers to "triplets (e,k,g)"; please correct this inconsistent notation.
  4. [2.2] In the n=0 evaluation, the Hodge integral used from [10, Theorem 4] is quoted without stating the exact formula; a short display of the quoted integral would make the numerical coefficient easier to verify.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the central genus-1 computation is derived from independent fixed-target and families-Hodge inputs, and Theorem 1 is a consequence of Theorem 2 via the general [46] correspondence, not an identity by construction.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained at the level of the paper's central claim. Theorem 2 is proven by reducing the families Hodge integral to a fixed elliptic curve invariant (2.3), whose evaluation is quoted from [36] and [48], with the nonzero-degree exchange justified by Proposition 7, proved in Section 2.5 via the exact sequence (2.5). The n=0 term is computed directly from Hodge integrals. Theorem 1 is then derived from Theorem 2 together with Lemma 11, Proposition 8, Proposition 10, and the connected/disconnected calculus; the traces Tr_n enter as explicit coefficients of the known quantum multiplication operator from [39], not as fitted parameters and not as renamed versions of the target invariant. The use of Theorem A from [46] is a citation to a general correspondence between Hilbert-scheme and families GW invariants; it is not defined in terms of the target series and does not acquire its content from the present result. Footnote 7 does flag a gap in the published proof of rationality in [46] and refers to a revision on the authors' websites; this is a genuine rigor and validation concern about an external cited input, but it is not a circular reduction, since the needed triangle correspondence is asserted in analytic-continuation form and the central computation of Theorem 2 has independent content. The equivalence of Theorems 2 and 3 via [23] is likewise imported as a prior parameter-free result rather than being manufactured by the present derivation. No equation in the paper reduces to its own input by construction, and no fitted quantity is relabeled as a prediction.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no free parameters and no invented entities. It relies on standard Gromov-Witten theory and on prior results, several by the same authors, treated as inputs rather than derived here. The main new computation, Theorem 2, is independent and does not reduce to a fitted quantity.

assumptions (5)
  • standard math The T-equivariant Gromov-Witten theory of Hilb^n(C^2) is well-defined, including virtual classes and localization.
    Standard background used throughout; foundational references [1,19,35].
  • domain assumption The rationality gap in [46] is filled in an authors' revision, and the analytic continuation from q=0 to q=-1 used in Theorem A holds.
    Stated in Section 0.3; the paper depends on Theorem A from [46] for the correspondence between Hilbert scheme and families invariants.
  • domain assumption The cycle class evaluations and the equivalence of Theorems 2 and 3 in [23] are correct.
    Used to obtain the Noether-Lefschetz statement (Theorem 3) from the new computation of Theorem 2.
  • domain assumption The fixed elliptic target Gromov-Witten evaluations from [36] and [48] are correct.
    Used in Section 2.6 to evaluate the fixed elliptic curve integrals.
  • ad hoc to paper The Wronskian nondegeneracy conjecture (Conjecture 13) holds for all n.
    Theorems 5 and 6, giving full reconstruction of genus 1 theory, depend on this conjecture, verified only for n<=7.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Gromov-Witten theory of $\mathsf{Hilb}^n(\mathbb{C}^2)$ and Noether-Lefschetz theory of $\mathcal{A}_g$." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/PSAUMKT2

@misc{pith2026250612438,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Gromov-Witten theory of $\mathsfHilb^n(\mathbbC^2)$ and Noether-Lefschetz theory of $\mathcalA_g$},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/PSAUMKT2}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.12438}
}
abstract

We calculate the genus 1 Gromov-Witten theory of the Hilbert scheme $\mathsf{Hilb}^n(\mathbb{C}^2)$ of points in the plane. The fundamental 1-point invariant (with a divisor insertion) is calculated using a correspondence with the families local curve Gromov-Witten theory over the moduli space $\overline{\mathcal{M}}_{1,1}$. The answer exactly matches a parallel calculation related to the Noether-Lefschetz geometry of the moduli space $\mathcal{A}_g$ of principally polarized abelian varieties. As a consequence, we prove that the associated cycle classes satisfy a homomorphism property for the projection operator on $\mathsf{CH}^*(\mathcal{A}_g)$. The fundamental 1-point invariant determines the full genus 1 Gromov-Witten theory of $\mathsf{Hilb}^n(\mathbb{C}^2)$ modulo a nondegeneracy conjecture about the quantum cohomology. A table of calculations is given.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Torelli loci, product cycles, and the homomorphism conjecture for $\mathcal{A}_g$

    math.AG 2026-01 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    For 2≤g≤8, taut([J_g]·[A_2×A_{g-2}]) = taut([J_g])·taut([A_2×A_{g-2}]), and similarly for ([J_6],[A_3×A_3]); the paper also constructs new Gorenstein-kernel classes in compact-type moduli spaces.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 50 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [46]

    Pandharipande, H.-H

    R. Pandharipande, H.-H. Tseng, Higher genus Gromov-Witten theory of Hilbn(C2) and CohFTs associated to local curves, Forum of Mathematics Pi 7 (2019), 63 pages

    work page 2019

  2. [23]

    Iribar-L ´opez, Noether-Lefschetz cycles on the moduli space of abelian varieties (2024), arXiv:2411.09910

    A. Iribar-L ´opez, Noether-Lefschetz cycles on the moduli space of abelian varieties (2024), arXiv:2411.09910

    work page arXiv 2024

  3. [1]

    Behrend, B

    K. Behrend, B. Fantechi, The intrinsic normal cone, Invent. math. 128 (1997), 45–88

    work page 1997

  4. [2]

    Birkenhake, H

    C. Birkenhake, H. Lange, Complex abelian varieties, Grundlehren Math. Wiss., 302, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2004

    work page 2004

  5. [3]

    Bryan, T

    J. Bryan, T. Graber, The crepant resolution conjecture , In: Algebraic geometry–Seattle 2005 , Part 1, 23–42, Proc. Sympos. Pure Math. 80, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2009

    work page 2005

  6. [4]

    Bryan, R

    J. Bryan, R. Pandharipande, The local Gromov-Witten theory of curves, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 21 (2008), 101–136

    work page 2008

  7. [5]

    Tautological projection for cycles on the moduli space of abelian varieties

    S. Canning, S. Molcho, D. Oprea, R. Pandharipande, Tautological projection for cycles on the moduli space of abelian varieties, Algebraic Geometry (to appear), arXiv:2401.15768

    work page Pith review arXiv

  8. [6]

    Tautological and non-tautological cycles on the moduli space of abelian varieties

    S. Canning, D. Oprea, R. Pandharipande, Tautological and non-tautological cycles on the moduli space of abelian varieties, Invent. Math. (to appear), arXiv:2408.08718

    work page Pith review arXiv

Show all 52 references
  1. [7]

    Carlsson, A

    E. Carlsson, A. Okounkov, Exts and vertex operators, Duke Math. J. 161 (2012), 1797–1815

    2012

  2. [8]

    Drakengren, Self-intersection of the Torelli map, in preparation

    L. Drakengren, Self-intersection of the Torelli map, in preparation

  3. [9]

    Dubrovin, Y

    B. Dubrovin, Y . Zhang, Bi-Hamiltonian hierarchies in 2D topological field theory at one-loop approximation , Comm. Math. Phys. 198 (1998), 311–361

    1998

  4. [10]

    Faber, R

    C. Faber, R. Pandharipande, Hodge integrals and Gromov-Witten theory, Invent. Math. 135 (1999), 487–517

    1999

  5. [11]

    Faber, R

    C. Faber, R. Pandharipande, Hodge integrals, partition matrices, and the λg conjecture, Ann. of Math. 157 (2003), 97–124. GROMOV-WITTEN THEORY OF Hilbn(C2) AND NOETHER-LEFSCHETZ THEORY OF Ag 39

    2003

  6. [12]

    Fogarty, Algebraic families on an algebraic surface, Amer

    J. Fogarty, Algebraic families on an algebraic surface, Amer. J. Math. 90 (1968), 511–521

    1968

  7. [13]

    Getzler, Intersection theory on M1,4 and elliptic Gromov-Witten invariants, J

    E. Getzler, Intersection theory on M1,4 and elliptic Gromov-Witten invariants, J. Am. Math. Soc. 10 (1997), 973–998

    1997

  8. [14]

    Getzler and R

    E. Getzler and R. Pandharipande, Virasoro constraints and the Chern classes of the Hodge bundle, Nuclear Phys. B 530 (1998), 701–714

    1998

  9. [15]

    Givental, Elliptic Gromov-Witten invariants and the generalized mirror conjecture, in: Integrable systems and alge- braic geometry (Kobe/Kyoto, 1997), 107–155, World Sci

    A. Givental, Elliptic Gromov-Witten invariants and the generalized mirror conjecture, in: Integrable systems and alge- braic geometry (Kobe/Kyoto, 1997), 107–155, World Sci. Publ., River Edge, NJ, 1998

    1997

  10. [16]

    Givental, Semisimple Frobenius structures at higher genus, Internat

    A. Givental, Semisimple Frobenius structures at higher genus, Internat. Math. Res. Notices 23 (2001), 1265–1286

    2001

  11. [17]

    G ¨ottsche, The Betti numbers of the Hilbert scheme of points on a smooth projective surface , Math

    L. G ¨ottsche, The Betti numbers of the Hilbert scheme of points on a smooth projective surface , Math. Ann. 286 (1990), 193-207

    1990

  12. [18]

    G ¨ottsche, Hilbert schemes of points on surface, ICM Proceedings, V ol

    L. G ¨ottsche, Hilbert schemes of points on surface, ICM Proceedings, V ol. II (Beijing, 2002), 483–494

    2002

  13. [19]

    Graber, R

    T. Graber, R. Pandharipande, Localization of virtual classes, Invent. Math. 135 (1999), 487–518

    1999

  14. [20]

    Greer, C

    F. Greer, C. Lian, d-elliptic loci and the Torelli map, Math. Res. Lett. (to appear), arXiv:2404.10826

    arXiv

  15. [21]

    Grojnowski, Instantons and affine algebras

    I. Grojnowski, Instantons and affine algebras. I. The Hilbert scheme and vertex operators , Math. Res. Lett. 3 (1996), 275–291

    1996

  16. [22]

    J. Hu, Z. Qin, Extremal Gromov-Witten invariants of the Hilbert scheme of 3 points, Forum Math. Sigma 11 (2023), 40 pages

    2023

  17. [24]

    Iribar-L ´opez, R

    A. Iribar-L ´opez, R. Pandharipande,and H.-H. Tseng, in preparation

  18. [25]

    Y .-P. Lee, R. Pandharipande,Frobenius manifolds, Gromov-Witten theory, Virasoro constraints, unpublished notes, avail- able on the authors’ websites

  19. [26]

    Lehn, Chern classes of tautological sheaves on Hilbert schemes of points on surfaces , Invent

    M. Lehn, Chern classes of tautological sheaves on Hilbert schemes of points on surfaces , Invent. Math. 136 (1999), 157–207

    1999

  20. [27]

    Lin,Getzler relation and Virasoro conjecture for genus one, Lett

    Y . Lin,Getzler relation and Virasoro conjecture for genus one, Lett. Math. Phys. 109 (2019), 2083–2132

    2019

  21. [28]

    Maulik, N

    D. Maulik, N. Nekrasov, A. Okounkov, R. Pandharipande, Gromov-Witten theory and Donaldson-Thomas theory I , Compos. Math. 142 (2006), 1263–1285

    2006

  22. [29]

    Maulik, N

    D. Maulik, N. Nekrasov, A. Okounkov, R. Pandharipande, Gromov-Witten theory and Donaldson-Thomas theory II , Compos. Math. 142 (2006), 1286–1304

    2006

  23. [30]

    Maulik and A

    D. Maulik and A. Okounkov, Quantum cohomology and quantum groups, Ast´erisque 408 (2019), 219pp

    2019

  24. [31]

    Maulik, D

    D. Maulik, D. Ranganathan, Logarithmic enumerative geometry for curves and sheaves , Cambridge Jour. of Math. 13 (2025), 51–172

    2025

  25. [32]

    Maulik, A

    D. Maulik, A. Oblomkov, Quantum cohomology of the Hilbert scheme of points of An-resolutions, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 22 (2009), 1055–1091

    2009

  26. [33]

    Molcho, R

    S. Molcho, R. Pandharipande, J. Schmitt, The Hodge bundle, the universal 0-section, and the log Chow ring of the moduli space of curves, Comp. Math. 159 (2023), 306–354

    2023

  27. [34]

    Nakajima, Heisenberg algebra and Hilbert schemes of points on projective surfaces , Ann

    H. Nakajima, Heisenberg algebra and Hilbert schemes of points on projective surfaces , Ann. of Math. 145 (1997), 379–388

    1997

  28. [35]

    Nakajima, Lectures on Hilbert schemes of points on surfaces, University Lecture Series 18, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1999

    H. Nakajima, Lectures on Hilbert schemes of points on surfaces, University Lecture Series 18, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1999

    1999

  29. [36]

    Oberdieck, A

    G. Oberdieck, A. Pixton, Quantum cohomology of the Hilbert scheme of points on an elliptic surface, arXiv:2312.13188 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  30. [37]

    Okounkov, R

    A. Okounkov, R. Pandharipande, Gromov-Witten theory, Hurwitz theory, and completed cycles, Ann. Math. (2) 163, No. 2, 517-560 (2006)

    2006

  31. [38]

    Okounkov, R

    A. Okounkov, R. Pandharipande, Gromov-Witten theory, Hurwitz numbers, and matrix models, I, Proc. Symposia Pure Math. 80 (2009), 325–414

    2009

  32. [39]

    Okounkov, R

    A. Okounkov, R. Pandharipande, Quantum cohomology of the Hilbert scheme of points in the plane , Invent. Math. 179 (2010), 523–557

    2010

  33. [40]

    Okounkov, R

    A. Okounkov, R. Pandharipande, The local Donaldson-Thomas theory of curves, Geom. Topol. 14 (2010), 1503–1567

    2010

  34. [41]

    Okounkov, R

    A. Okounkov, R. Pandharipande, The quantum differential equation of the Hilbert scheme of points in the plane, Trans- form. Groups 15 (2010), 965–982

    2010

  35. [42]

    The On-line Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences, published electronically at oeis.org, 2010, Sequence A066633

    2010

  36. [43]

    Pandharipande, Hodge integrals and degenerate contributions, Commun

    R. Pandharipande, Hodge integrals and degenerate contributions, Commun. Math. Phys. 208 (1999), 486–506. 40 IRIBAR L ´OPEZ, PANDHARIPANDE, AND TSENG

    1999

  37. [44]

    Pandharipande, Cohomological field theory calculations , in: Proceedings of the ICM-Rio de Janeiro 2018, Vol

    R. Pandharipande, Cohomological field theory calculations , in: Proceedings of the ICM-Rio de Janeiro 2018, Vol. 1, Plenary lectures, 869–898, World Sci. Publications: Hackensack, NJ, 2018

    2018

  38. [45]

    Pandharipande, R

    R. Pandharipande, R. Thomas, Curve counting via stable pairs in the derived category, Invent. Math. 178 (2009), 407– 447

    2009

  39. [47]

    Pandharipande, H.-H

    R. Pandharipande, H.-H. Tseng, The Hilb/Sym correspondence for C2: descendents and Fourier-Mukai , Math. Ann. 375 (2019), 509–540

    2019

  40. [48]

    Pixton, The Gromov-Witten theory of an elliptic curve and quasimodular forms , senior thesis, Princeton University, 2008

    A. Pixton, The Gromov-Witten theory of an elliptic curve and quasimodular forms , senior thesis, Princeton University, 2008

    2008

  41. [49]

    Teleman, The structure of 2D semi-simple field theories, Invent

    C. Teleman, The structure of 2D semi-simple field theories, Invent. Math. 188 (2012), 525–588

    2012

  42. [50]

    van der Geer, Cycles on the moduli space of abelian varieties , in: Moduli of curves and abelian varieties , pages 65–89

    G. van der Geer, Cycles on the moduli space of abelian varieties , in: Moduli of curves and abelian varieties , pages 65–89. Vieweg+Teubner Verlag, Wiesbaden, 1999

    1999

  43. [51]

    van der Put, M

    M. van der Put, M. Singer, Galois theory of linear differential equations, Grundlehren Math. Wiss., 328, Springer, 438 p. (2003)

    2003

  44. [52]

    Wennink, Reconstruction theorems for genus 2 Gromov-Witten invariants(2022), arXiv:2210.04038

    T. Wennink, Reconstruction theorems for genus 2 Gromov-Witten invariants(2022), arXiv:2210.04038. DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS , ETH Z ¨URICH , R ¨AMISTRASSE 101, 8092 Z ¨URICH , S WITZERLAND Email address: aitor.iribarlopez@math.ethz.ch DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS , ETH Z ¨URICH ,...

    2022 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.