Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 119 references

DAIEM: Decolonizing Algorithm's Role as a Team-member in Informal E-market

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Informal e-market sellers in Bangladesh treat platform algorithms as a team member that amplifies posts and coordinates outreach, and the authors propose a six-part framework, DAIEM, for designing such systems.

desk verdict Solid ethnographic material on Bangladeshi informal e-market sellers, but the DAIEM framework is a placeholder, not a validated tool. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.12910 v1 pith:IPIT6O64 submitted 2025-06-15 cs.HC

ATM Mizanur Rahman (1) , Md Romael Haque (2) , Sharifa Sultana (1) ((1) University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign , (2) Purdue University Fort Wayne) This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.HC
keywords informale-marketalgorithmiccollaborationhuman-centeredAIdecolonialdesignBangladeshsocialcommerceCSCW
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that small sellers in Bangladesh's informal e-market—businesses run through Facebook pages, WhatsApp groups, and delivery apps rather than formal e-commerce—do not experience platform algorithms as passive background infrastructure. Instead they treat the algorithm as an active team member: it amplifies posts, fields first questions through chatbots, and extends a post's reach, and sellers deliberately choreograph posts, reply timing, captions, and small paid boosts to work with it. Drawing on 37 interviews with sellers, buyers, delivery workers, bot entrepreneurs, investors, and group admins, the paper shows both edges of this relationship: algorithms bring visibility and speed, yet they cannot bargain, read a buyer's mood, recognize local culture (flagging dried fish as prohibited goods or a sari as nudity), or spare sellers from constant platform pressure. Buyers and investors, meanwhile, place greater trust in human contact than in bots, exposing a postcolonial tension between global platform logics and local market values. From these findings the authors build DAIEM, a six-component framework—autonomy and agency; resistance; locality, culture, and history; rationality; materiality; and advocacy—that they propose as both a guideline for designing algorithms and an analytical tool for evaluating informal e-market ecosystems.

What carries the argument

Two linked objects carry the argument. The first is the ethnographic concept of the 'algorithm as a sales team member': a framing grounded in the interview data under which post-timing, reply-staggering, paid boosting, urgency cues, and chatbot delegation count as collaborative work with the platform rather than passive exposure to it. The second is the DAIEM framework, a six-component structure—autonomy and agency; resistance; locality, culture, and history; rationality; materiality; and advocacy—with each component derived from a pattern in the findings, such as seller autonomy practices, refusals and workarounds, cultural misrecognition by moderation, alternative rationalities, material constraints like low bandwidth and cash exchange, and collective advocacy demands. DAIEM does the paper's constructive work: it converts empirical findings into a transferable instrument that is claimed to work both as a guideline for algorithm design and as an analytical tool for evaluating such ecosystems, extendable beyond e-markets to other low-resource, power-imbalanced settings.

What would settle it

A deployment study would settle the central claim: derive concrete design criteria from DAIEM's six components, build one of the tools sellers requested (a bargaining-aware chatbot, a post scheduler, or a sentiment-aware comment moderator), and run it with a group of informal sellers for several months while a control group uses stock Facebook features. The framework fails as a design guideline if the six components cannot be translated into buildable criteria, and it fails as an analytical tool if it cannot distinguish the deployed system from the baseline on the dimensions it names; the 'team member' claim itself could be tested by measuring whether sellers' engagement-choreography tactics (timed replies, staggered self-comments) actually change post reach relative to un-staged posts.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that in Bangladesh's informal e-market, the algorithm is best understood not as infrastructure but as a collaborator: sellers adapt to the algorithmic logics of platforms, bots, and associated applications 'as if the algorithm itself were a team member' that amplifies posts, coordinates outreach, and facilitates real-time interaction with buyers. This perception shows up in concrete tactics reported in the interviews: withholding prices to provoke comments, timing replies and self-comments to stretch the visibility window, paying small boosting fees to trigger feedback loops, writing urgency cues into captions, and delegating first-line customer contact to customizable chatbots. The same interviews map where the algorithmic teammate fails—it cannot bargain, produce personalized product-verification videos, moderate hostile comments, understand a buyer's emotional state, or pause for holidays and burnout, and its content moderation misflags culturally normal goods. Buyers find the algorithm convenient for discovery and comparison but distrust it for negotiation and resent the public exposure of their likes and comments; investors fault AI startups for importing Western product visions instead of local trust practices. The paper's deliverable is DAIEM, whose six components—autonomy and agency, resistance, locality/culture/history, rationality, materiality, and advocacy—are offered as a decolonial design guideline and analytical tool for informal e-markets and similar low-resource settings.

Load-bearing premise

The paper's load-bearing premise is that DAIEM's six components can be turned into concrete, buildable design criteria and evaluative measures, since the authors concede the framework remains a conceptual contribution not yet tested through design and deployment; the interview findings also rest on 37 snowball-recruited participants already active on digital platforms, which may not represent sellers excluded by infrastructural, linguistic, or financial barriers.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If sellers genuinely collaborate with the algorithm, then platform and tool design should support that collaboration explicitly—post schedulers, engagement analytics, sentiment-aware moderation—rather than treating informal commerce as misuse of social features.
  • Algorithms built with DAIEM would need to accommodate practices platforms currently penalize or ignore: intentional opacity such as price withholding, bargaining, delayed replies, and refusal of standardized workflows.
  • The documented postcolonial tension implies that AI education and startup training, not just algorithm design, must absorb local market values before investor trust and market growth can align.
  • The framework is intended to generalize beyond Bangladesh's e-market to other informal, low-resource, power-imbalanced sectors such as global development collaborations and informal care work.
  • Specific tool gaps the startups describe—Bangla-language NLP, offline-first design, emotional tone detection, inventory tracking from chat messages—are the concrete design targets a DAIEM-guided development effort would take up first.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the 'algorithm as teammate' framing generalizes, the conventional e-commerce yardsticks of conversion and click-through are the wrong measures for informal markets; a better metric would track how well the platform keeps the seller–buyer conversation alive, since engagement timing is what sellers actually optimize.
  • The trust asymmetry—sellers trust bots, buyers trust humans—yields a testable prediction the paper does not run: a chatbot that hands off to a human seller at the bargaining moment should measurably outperform a fully automated one.
  • DAIEM's six components could be operationalized as an audit checklist for platform features in informal markets (Does a moderation decision admit appeal? Does visibility respect local calendars?), which would supply the empirical validation the authors concede the framework still needs.
  • The cultural misflagging cases (dried fish as 'prohibited goods,' saris as 'nudity') point to a concrete technical fix—localized moderation training data—without which the platform's team member will keep disrupting the very sellers it amplifies.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports a qualitative interview study (n=37) with sellers, buyers, delivery personnel, AI startup entrepreneurs, investors, and a support-group admin in Bangladesh's informal e-market, examining how participants perceive and interact with platform algorithms, chatbots, and associated ICTs. The central finding is that sellers experience and work with algorithms as a 'team member' that amplifies posts, coordinates outreach, and manages initial buyer interactions, while buyers place greater trust in human interaction; this asymmetry is interpreted as a postcolonial tension. Based on these findings, the paper proposes DAIEM, a six-component framework (autonomy and agency; resistance; locality, culture, and history; rationality; materiality; advocacy), which the abstract claims will serve both as a guideline for algorithm design and as an analytical tool.

Significance. If the empirical finding is accurate, the paper makes a useful contribution to CSCW/HCI by extending algorithmic-labor scholarship from formal gig work to informal social-media commerce in a Global South setting, with rich direct quotes and transparent thematic analysis. The paper also explicitly acknowledges its sampling and generalizability limits. However, the central deliverable, DAIEM, is presented as a design guideline and analytical tool without operational definitions, an application procedure, or empirical validation; the paper itself concedes this in Section 6.4. The significance of the work therefore currently rests on the interview findings and design implications, not on the DAIEM framework as specified.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract; Sections 6.3 and 6.4] The abstract and Section 6.3 claim that DAIEM 'serves both as a guideline for algorithm design and as an analytical tool,' but Section 6.4 concedes that DAIEM 'remains a conceptual contribution that requires further empirical validation through design and deployment.' No operational definitions, indicators, or procedures are given for the six components, and no example shows how a designer or evaluator would apply them to reach a determinate conclusion. This is a load-bearing gap because the framework is identified in Section 1 and the Conclusion as one of the paper's four contributions. The authors should either provide an application protocol and worked example, or revise the claims to describe DAIEM as a set of preliminary design considerations rather than a validated tool.
  2. [Section 5.5; Sections 1 and 6.4] The paper's framing is categorical: Section 1 states that sellers 'strategically engage with platform algorithms... as collaborators' and introduces the algorithm as a 'sales team member.' Yet in Section 5.5 the support-group admin (P34) estimates that fewer than 10 percent of her member entrepreneurs use custom bots or know how to 'play with' the algorithms. Because the eligibility criteria in Section 3.1 require prior experience with informal e-market platforms, the sample is necessarily skewed toward digitally active users, as Section 6.4 acknowledges. The 'team member' phenomenon should be presented as a practice of some—possibly a minority—of sellers, with the distribution of the relevant behaviors across the 18 seller participants made explicit, rather than as a universal characterization.
  3. [Section 6.3; Section 3.3] The six DAIEM components are not shown to follow from the thematic analysis in a reproducible way. Section 3.3 describes open coding and thematic analysis, and Section 5 presents themes, but Section 6.3 introduces autonomy and agency, resistance, locality/culture/history, rationality, materiality, and advocacy without describing how these components were derived from the codes or how they map onto specific findings. This creates an inductive circularity: the same interview themes are used both to motivate the need for DAIEM and to constitute its content. The authors should include a derivation table, audit trail, or coding-to-component mapping, and should specify what evidence would count against each component.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 1] Several typos and grammatical issues appear, including 'Noteworthy that just not the sellers,' 'leaverage,' and 'inform e-market' (missing 'al'); these should be corrected throughout.
  2. [Section 5.1.1(c)] After the sentence 'P28 described how this helped prevent lost sales.' no quotation or participant text follows; the passage appears truncated and should be completed.
  3. [Section 6.3] 'docloniality' should be 'decoloniality'; the same typo also appears in the opening of Section 6.
  4. [Section 5.2 and Figure 1] The buyer subsection repeatedly uses 'algorithm as a seller team member,' which does not match the buyer-oriented examples given; the authors should either reframe the heading or adjust the terminology. Additionally, Figure 1 is not referenced or explained in the text beyond its caption.
  5. [Section 5.3] The delivery personnel section is based on only two participants; while the quotes are detailed, the generalizing language to 'delivery personnel' as a group should be qualified to reflect the small number of interviewees.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the core empirical finding is independently grounded in interview data, and DAIEM is explicitly presented as a conceptual framework requiring future validation.

full rationale

The paper contains no equations, fitted parameters, or predictive claims that reduce by construction to its inputs. The main empirical result—sellers treating social-media algorithms as a 'team member'—is based on 37 semi-structured interviews and is reported independently of DAIEM. DAIEM is presented in Section 6.3 as a framework 'developed' from 'findings and further analysis,' and Section 6.4 explicitly concedes that it 'remains a conceptual contribution that requires further empirical validation through design and deployment.' That is an inductive synthesis, not a circular derivation: the framework is not used to derive the data or to generate a numerically forced prediction. The paper's self-citations (e.g., [95–98] on alternative rationalities, [78] on informal FinTech) are background scholarly support, not a load-bearing uniqueness theorem or an unexamined imported premise. The abstract's statement that DAIEM 'will serve' as a design guideline and analytical tool is an untested aspirational claim, which is a correctness/validity limitation acknowledged by the authors themselves, not a circularity. Therefore no circular step can be exhibited with a specific reduction, and the appropriate score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No numerical free parameters or physical invented entities appear in this qualitative paper. The load-bearing assumptions are domain-level: the applicability of the informal-market definition, the reliability of self-reported algorithm experiences, the representativeness of snowball sampling, and the sufficiency of DAIEM's six components. DAIEM itself is a conceptual framework, not an invented physical entity.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The ILO definition of informal market applies to Facebook-based sales in Bangladesh.
    Section 2 opens with the ILO definition and treats the Bangladesh Facebook market as informal without interrogating boundary cases.
  • domain assumption Participant accounts of algorithmic behavior (boosting, notification failures, moderation flags) reflect actual platform mechanisms.
    Findings in Sections 5.1 through 5.5 rely on self-reports; the study does not log platform data or verify algorithm behavior independently.
  • domain assumption Snowball sampling through researchers' networks reaches a representative range of informal e-market stakeholders.
    Recruitment in Section 3.1 uses the authors' social capital and a Facebook post; Section 6.4 acknowledges exclusion of people not active online.
  • ad hoc to paper The six DAIEM components are sufficient and appropriate dimensions for decolonial algorithm design.
    DAIEM in Section 6.3 is derived from the same interview themes that constitute the findings; no independent validation or comparison with alternative frameworks is provided.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of DAIEM: Decolonizing Algorithm's Role as a Team-member in Informal E-market." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/IPIT6O64

@misc{pith2026250612910,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: DAIEM: Decolonizing Algorithm's Role as a Team-member in Informal E-market},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/IPIT6O64}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.12910}
}
read the original abstract

In Bangladesh's rapidly expanding informal e-market, small-scale sellers use social media platforms like Facebook to run businesses outside formal infrastructures. These sellers rely heavily on platform algorithms, not just for visibility, but as active collaborators in business operations. Drawing on 37 in-depth interviews with sellers, buyers, and stakeholders, this paper examines how people in informal e-markets perceive and interact with the algorithm as a "team member" that performs sales, marketing, and customer engagement tasks. We found that while sellers and local tech entrepreneurs are interested in developing services to support this industry, buyers and investors place greater trust in human interactions. This reveals a postcolonial tension involving cultural values, local tech education and training, and a mismatch between the global and Bangladeshi e-market growth. We expand this discussion using perspectives from HCI, political design, and AI design. We also support the decoloniality movement in informal e-markets by proposing the DAIEM framework, which includes six components: autonomy and agency; resistance; locality, culture, and history; rationality; materiality; and advocacy. DAIEM serves as both a guideline for algorithm design and an analytical tool.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.12910 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The Decolonial Algorithm for Informal E-market (DAIEM) framework consisting of six dimensions: au￾tonomy and agency; resistance; locality, culture, and history; rationality; materiality; and advocacy. 6.3.1 Autonomy and Agency. Designing algo￾rithms for informal e-markets in postcolonial contexts requires a shift from universalist opti￾mization logics toward infrastructural arrange￾ments that recognize autonomy as s… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

119 extracted references · 75 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Syed Ishtiaque Ahmed, Md Romael Haque, Jay Chen, and Nicola Dell. 2017. Digital Privacy Challenges with Shared Mobile Phone Use in Bangladesh.Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction1, CSCW (2017), 17

    2017

  2. [2]

    Syed Ishtiaque Ahmed, Nusrat Jahan Mim, and Steven J Jackson. 2015. Residual mobilities: infrastructural displacement and post-colonial computing in Bangladesh. InProceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 437–446

    2015

  3. [3]

    Soliman Aljarboa. 2024. Factors influencing the adoption of artificial intelligence in e-commerce by small and medium-sized enterprises.International Journal of Information Management Data Insights4, 2 (2024), 100285

    2024

  4. [4]

    NEHB Amor. 2019. What skills make a salesperson effective? An exploratory comparative study among car sales professionals.International Business Research12, 11 (2019), 76–93

    2019

  5. [5]

    1993.Colonizing the body: State medicine and epidemic disease in nineteenth-century India

    David Arnold. 1993.Colonizing the body: State medicine and epidemic disease in nineteenth-century India. Univ of California Press

    1993

  6. [6]

    Leonard L. Berry. 1995. Relationship marketing of services—growing interest, emerging perspectives.Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science23, 4 (1995), 236–245. https://doi.org/10.1177/009207039502300402

    work page doi:10.1177/009207039502300402 1995

  7. [7]

    Bhattacharya

    R. Bhattacharya. 2019. ICT Solutions for the Informal Sector in Developing Economies: What Can One Expect?The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries(2019)

    2019

  8. [8]

    Shehreen Amin Bhuiyan and Minhazul Abedin. 2024. The curious case of Facebook commerce: an analysis of the digital commerce management guide 2021.Southeast Asia: A Multidisciplinary Journal24, 1 (2024), 3–15

    2024

Show all 119 references
  1. [9]

    Timothy Bickmore and Justine Cassell. 2001. Relational agents: a model and implementation of building user trust. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. 396–403

    2001

  2. [10]

    1998.Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development

    Richard E Boyatzis. 1998.Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. sage

    1998

  3. [11]

    2023.E-commerce and the Rise of Digital Marketplaces in Africa

    Ajim Capital. 2023.E-commerce and the Rise of Digital Marketplaces in Africa. https://www .ajimcapital.com/blog/e- commerce-and-the-rise-of-digital-marketplaces-in-africa

    2023

  4. [12]

    Priyank Chandra, Syed Ishtiaque Ahmed, and Joyojeet Pal. 2017. Market Practices and the Bazaar: Technology Consumption in ICT Markets in the Global South. InProceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 4741–4752

    2017

  5. [13]

    Priyank Chandra and Joyojeet Pal. 2019. Rumors and Collective Sensemaking: Managing Ambiguity in an Informal Marketplace. InProceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–12

    2019

  6. [14]

    2007.Rethinking the informal economy: Linkages with the formal economy and the formal regulatory environment

    Martha Alter Chen. 2007.Rethinking the informal economy: Linkages with the formal economy and the formal regulatory environment. DESA Working Paper 46. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/63329/1/488006546.pdf

    2007

  7. [15]

    Madiha Zahrah Choksi, Marianne Aubin Le Quéré, Travis Lloyd, Ruojia Tao, James Grimmelmann, and Mor Naaman

  8. [16]

    Michael D Clemes, Christopher Gan, and Junli Zhang. 2014. An empirical analysis of online shopping adoption in Beijing, China.Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services21, 3 (2014), 364–375

    2014

  9. [17]

    Anna Croon. 2022. Thinking with care in human–computer interaction.Feminist Theory23, 2 (2022), 232–246

    2022

  10. [18]

    2024.Empowering Women Entrepreneurs: Harnessing Digital Payments to Serve Domestic and International Clients

    DataSense. 2024.Empowering Women Entrepreneurs: Harnessing Digital Payments to Serve Domestic and International Clients. https://datasense.services/?p=1700

    2024

  11. [19]

    Anya De. 2025. Business on WhatsApp is Tough Now—But Am I Really a Businesswoman? Exploring Challenges with Adapting to WhatsApp Business. (2025). Preprint, arXiv, 2025

    2025

  12. [20]

    Algorithms ruin everything

    Michael Ann DeVito, Darren Gergle, and Jeremy Birnholtz. 2017. " Algorithms ruin everything" # RIPTwitter, Folk Theories, and Resistance to Algorithmic Change in Social Media. InProceedings of the 2017 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 3163–3174

    2017

  13. [21]

    2025.Telegram vs

    Arya Dinesh. 2025.Telegram vs. Whatsapp for Business: Which is Better?https://clickup .com/blog/telegram-vs- whatsapp-for-business/

    2025

  14. [22]

    Fabian Driediger and Veera Bhatiasevi. 2019. Online grocery shopping in Thailand: Consumer acceptance and usage behavior.Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services48 (2019), 224–237

    2019

  15. [23]

    Rong-Ruey Duh, Shyam Sunder, and Karim Jamal. 2002. Control and assurance in e-commerce: Privacy, integrity, and security at eBay. (2002)

    2002

  16. [24]

    Abdul Q Ebrahim and Carolien L Van den Berg. 2024. The barriers to technology adoption among businesses in the informal economy in Cape Town.South African Journal of Information Management26, 1 (2024), 1872

    2024

  17. [25]

    Annesha Enam, Imtiaz Ibne Azad, and Shadia Afrin. 2024. Exploring online shopping behavior in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives(2024)

    2024

  18. [26]

    Motahhare Eslami, Karrie Karahalios, Christian Sandvig, Kristen Vaccaro, Aimee Rickman, Kevin Hamilton, and Alex Kirlik. 2016. First I" like" it, then I hide it: Folk Theories of Social Feeds. InProceedings of the 2016 cHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 2371...

    2016

  19. [27]

    Jennifer Fereday and Eimear Muir-Cochrane. 2006. Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development.International journal of qualitative methods5, 1 (2006), 80–92

    2006

  20. [28]

    Andrea Ferrario and Michele Loi. 2022. How explainability contributes to trust in AI. InProceedings of the 2022 ACM conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency. 1457–1466

    2022

  21. [29]

    2020.Facebook Shops is tech giant’s new online marketplace

    Sara Fischer. 2020.Facebook Shops is tech giant’s new online marketplace. https://www .axios.com/2020/05/19/facebook- shops-online-marketplace

    2020

  22. [30]

    Leo A Goodman. 1961. Snowball sampling.The annals of mathematical statistics(1961), 148–170

    1961

  23. [31]

    Mike Harding, Bran Knowles, Nigel Davies, and Mark Rouncefield. 2015. HCI, civic engagement & trust. InProceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2833–2842

    2015

  24. [32]

    Keith Hart. 1973. Informal income opportunities and urban employment in Ghana.The journal of modern African studies11, 1 (1973), 61–89

    1973

  25. [33]

    Endang Putri Damai Hia, Dedi Prestiadi, Siti Isnaini Maghfiroh, Vera Mega Oktaviani, et al . 2020. The use of information and communication technology through website and social media as public relations information media. In2nd early childhood and primary childhood education ...

    2020

  26. [34]

    Nils Høgevold, Rocio Rodriguez, Göran Svensson, and Carmen Otero-Neira. 2021. B to B sellers’ skill level in sales performance–frameworks and findings.Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing28, 3 (2021), 265–281

    2021

  27. [35]

    Fazlul Hoque, Tahmina Akter Joya, Asma Akter, Taskin Afrina, Tahrima Haque Beg, and Abu Zafar Ahmed Mukul

  28. [36]

    Syed Far Abid Hossain. 2019. Social networking and its role in media entrepreneurship: Evaluating the use of mobile phones in the context of online shopping–A review.Journal of Media Management and Entrepreneurship (JMME)1, 1 (2019), 73–86

    2019

  29. [37]

    Fabliha Tasnim Hride, Farhana Ferdousi, and Sajjad M Jasimuddin. 2022. Linking perceived price fairness, customer satisfaction, trust, and loyalty: A structural equation modeling of Facebook-based e-commerce in Bangladesh.Global Business and Organizational Excellence41, 3 (202...

    2022

  30. [38]

    2024.Telegram for business: a step-by-step guide

    Yu Huan. 2024.Telegram for business: a step-by-step guide. https://sleekflow.io/blog/telegram-business

    2024

  31. [39]

    Shaiara Husain, Shanjida Yasmin, and MD Shahidul Islam. 2015. Assessment of the socioeconomic aspects of street vendors in Dhaka city: evidence from Bangladesh.Asian Social Science11, 26 (2015), 1

    2015

  32. [40]

    Lilly Irani, Janet Vertesi, Paul Dourish, Kavita Philip, and Rebecca E Grinter. 2010. Postcolonial computing: a lens on design and development. InProceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM, 1311–1320

    2010

  33. [41]

    2024.F-commerce boom amid the pandemic: How women are taking the lead

    Nilima Jahan. 2024.F-commerce boom amid the pandemic: How women are taking the lead. https: //www.thedailystar.net/supplements/international-womens-day-2021/news/f-commerce-boom-amid-the- pandemic-how-women-are-taking-the-lead-2056793

    2024

  34. [42]

    Kartik Joshi and Preeti Mudliar. 2025. Reselling Practices in a Textile Bazaar: Translating E-Commerce Platforms to WhatsApp. InProceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–18

    2025

  35. [43]

    Davinder Kaur, Suleyman Uslu, Kaley J Rittichier, and Arjan Durresi. 2022. Trustworthy artificial intelligence: a review.ACM computing surveys (CSUR)55, 2 (2022), 1–38

    2022

  36. [44]

    2025.Buy and Sell Facebook Groups: The Ultimate Guide in 2025

    Ashfak Kausik. 2025.Buy and Sell Facebook Groups: The Ultimate Guide in 2025. https://groupboss .io/blog/buy-and- sell-facebook-groups/

    2025

  37. [45]

    2025.This Is How You Can Sell Your Stuff on Instagram

    Ashfak Kausik. 2025.This Is How You Can Sell Your Stuff on Instagram. https://groupboss .io/blog/buy-and-sell- facebook-groups/

    2025

  38. [46]

    Rahim Kurwa. 2019. Building the digitally gated community: The case of Nextdoor.Surveillance & Society17, 1/2 (2019), 111–117

    2019

  39. [47]

    Christine P Lee. 2024. Design, development, and deployment of context-adaptive AI systems for enhanced user adoption. InExtended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–5

    2024

  40. [48]

    2022.The inside story of Facebook Marketplace

    Deb Liu. 2022.The inside story of Facebook Marketplace. https://www .lennysnewsletter.com/p/the-inside-story-of- facebook-marketplace

    2022

  41. [49]

    2024.TikTok and the live shopping revolution

    Meagan Loyst. 2024.TikTok and the live shopping revolution. https://www .thetimes.com/business- money/entrepreneurs/article/tiktok-and-the-live-shopping-revolution-enterprise-network-n6z6f9mb0?msockid = 1f724c45e0186b7b335b5868e1776a7c

    2024

  42. [50]

    Michael L Mallin. 2016. Developing proactive salespeople–a study and recommendations for sales management. Development and Learning in Organizations: An International Journal30, 4 (2016), 9–12

    2016

  43. [51]

    Christina A Masden, Catherine Grevet, Rebecca E Grinter, Eric Gilbert, and W Keith Edwards. 2014. Tensions in scaling-up community social media: a multi-neighborhood study of nextdoor. InProceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. 3239–3248. , V...

    2014

  44. [52]

    Malak Mashaabi, Areej Alotaibi, Hala Qudaih, Raghad Alnashwan, and Hend Al-Khalifa. 2022. Natural language processing in customer service: A systematic review.arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.09523(2022)

    2022 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Arunesh Mathur, Arvind Narayanan, and Marshini Chetty. 2018. Endorsements on social media: An empirical study of affiliate marketing disclosures on YouTube and Pinterest.Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 2, CSCW (2018), 1–26

    2018

  46. [54]

    Greenberg

    David Mayer and Herbert M. Greenberg. 2006.What Makes a Good Salesman. https://hbr .org/2006/07/what-makes- a-good-salesman

    2006

  47. [55]

    2021.Instagram, Facebook, Snapchat, TikTok: The social shopping race

    Maghan McDowell. 2021.Instagram, Facebook, Snapchat, TikTok: The social shopping race. https:// www.voguebusiness.com/technology/instagram-facebook-snapchat-tiktok-the-social-shopping-race

    2021

  48. [56]

    Glaucia Melo dos Santos. 2023. Adaptive Human-Chatbot Interactions: Contextual Factors, Variability Design and Levels of Automation. (2023)

    2023

  49. [57]

    Samantha Merritt and Shaowen Bardzell. 2011. Postcolonial language and culture theory for HCI4D. InCHI’11 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1675–1680

    2011

  50. [58]

    Tehila Minkus and Keith W Ross. 2014. I know what you’re buying: Privacy breaches on ebay. InPrivacy Enhancing Technologies: 14th International Symposium, PETS 2014, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, July 16-18, 2014. Proceedings 14. Springer, 164–183

    2014

  51. [59]

    2018.Nigeria fashion finds a market at home and abroad

    Hamza Mohamed. 2018.Nigeria fashion finds a market at home and abroad. https://www .aljazeera.com/features/ 2018/5/9/nigeria-fashion-finds-a-market-at-home-and-abroad

    2018

  52. [60]

    Robert M Morgan and Shelby D Hunt. 1994. The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing.Journal of marketing58, 3 (1994), 20–38

    1994

  53. [61]

    Maryam Mustafa, Noor Mazhar, Ayesha Asghar, Maryem Zafar Usmani, Lubna Razaq, and Richard Anderson. 2019. Digital financial needs of micro-entrepreneur women in Pakistan: is mobile money the answer?. InProceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–12

    2019

  54. [62]

    Nika Naghavi. 2019. Social commerce in emerging markets: Understanding the landscape and opportunities for mobile money.GSM Association(2019)

    2019

  55. [63]

    2025.Why is Mercado Libre the “Amazon” of Latin America?https://nocnocstore .com/en/why-is-mercado- libre-the-amazon-of-latin-america/

    Nocnoc. 2025.Why is Mercado Libre the “Amazon” of Latin America?https://nocnocstore .com/en/why-is-mercado- libre-the-amazon-of-latin-america/

    2025

  56. [64]

    2023.Informality and Globalisation

    OECD. 2023.Informality and Globalisation. https://www .oecd.org/en/publications/informality-and-globalisation_ c945c24f-en.html

    2023

  57. [65]

    1972.Employment, incomes and equality; a strategy for increasing productive employment in Kenya

    International Labour Organization. 1972.Employment, incomes and equality; a strategy for increasing productive employment in Kenya. https://labordoc.ilo.org/discovery/fulldisplay/alma991450513402676/41ILO_INST:41ILO_V2

    1972

  58. [66]

    2024.Informal economy

    International Labour Organization. 2024.Informal economy. https://www .ilo.org/projects-and-partnerships/projects/ partnership-improving-prospects-forcibly-displaced-persons-and-host/themes/informal-economy

    2024

  59. [67]

    Joyojeet Pal, Priyank Chandra, Vaishnav Kameswaran, Aakanksha Parameshwar, Sneha Joshi, and Aditya Johri. 2018. Digital Payment and Its Discontents: Street Shops and the Indian Government’s Push for Cashless Transactions. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Fact...

    2018

  60. [68]

    Pathao Ltd. 2025. Pathao Parcel. https://pathao.com/parcel/

    2025

  61. [69]

    Kavita Philip, Lilly Irani, and Paul Dourish. 2012. Postcolonial computing: A tactical survey.Science, Technology, & Human Values37, 1 (2012), 3–29

    2012

  62. [70]

    2020.Hiding in Plain Site: Informal E-Commerce Among Women in Asia

    Joep Roest Pial Islam. 2020.Hiding in Plain Site: Informal E-Commerce Among Women in Asia. https://www .cgap.org/ blog/hiding-in-plain-site-informal-e-commerce-among-women-in-asia

    2020

  63. [71]

    2022.Digitalizing Informal Business: What Systems Mapping Reveals about Drivers and Effects

    United Nations Development Programme. 2022.Digitalizing Informal Business: What Systems Mapping Reveals about Drivers and Effects. https://www .undp.org/acceleratorlabs/blog/digitalizing-informal-business-what-systems- mapping-reveals-about-drivers-and-effects

    2022

  64. [72]

    Guo-Jun Qi, Charu Aggarwal, Qi Tian, Heng Ji, and Thomas Huang. 2011. Exploring context and content links in social media: A latent space method.IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence34, 5 (2011), 850–862

    2011

  65. [73]

    Anirudh Raju, Behnam Hedayatnia, Linda Liu, Ankur Gandhe, Chandra Khatri, Angeliki Metallinou, Anu Venkatesh, and Ariya Rastrow. 2018. Contextual language model adaptation for conversational agents.arXiv preprint arXiv:1806.10215(2018)

    2018 arXiv

  66. [74]

    2025.Singapore retailers enter Thailand, Malaysia via Shopee, Lazada

    Jaleen Ramos. 2025.Singapore retailers enter Thailand, Malaysia via Shopee, Lazada. https://retailasia .com/e- commerce/exclusive/singapore-retailers-enter-thailand-malaysia-shopee-lazada

    2025

  67. [75]

    Matt Ratto and Steven J Jackson. 2023. Reopening, repetition and resetting: HCI and the method of hope.Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction7, CSCW2 (2023), 1–30

    2023

  68. [76]

    Jens Riegelsberger, M Angela Sasse, and John D McCarthy. 2005. The mechanics of trust: A framework for research and design.International journal of human-computer studies62, 3 (2005), 381–422. , Vol. 1, No. 1, Article . Publication date: September 2024. 30 Rahman et al

    2005

  69. [77]

    Ataur Rahman, and Syed Ishtiaque Ahmed

    Yasaman Rohanifar, Priyank Chandra, M. Ataur Rahman, and Syed Ishtiaque Ahmed. 2021. Money Whispers: Informality, International Politics, and Immigration in Transnational Finance. InProceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–14

    2021

  70. [78]

    Yasaman Rohanifar, Sharifa Sultana, Shaid Hasan, Priyank Chandra, and Syed Ishtiaque Ahmed. 2022. Kabootar: Towards Informal, Trustworthy, and Community-Based FinTech for Marginalized Immigrants.Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction6, CSCW2 (2022), 1–32

    2022

  71. [79]

    Yasaman Rohanifar, Sharifa Sultana, Swapnil Nandy, Pratyasha Saha, Md Jonayed Hossain Chowdhury, Mahdi Nas- rullah Al-Ameen, and Syed Ishtiaque Ahmed. 2022. The role of intermediaries, terrorist assemblage, and re-skilling in the adoption of cashless transaction systems in ban...

    2022

  72. [80]

    Joel Rumanyika, Mikko Apiola, Nasibu Rajabu Mramba, Solomon Sunday Oyelere, and Matti Tedre. 2022. Design and development of Machinga mobile trading application: A participatory and design science research.African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development14, 5...

    2022

  73. [81]

    Ruslin Ruslin, Saepudin Mashuri, Muhammad Sarib Abdul Rasak, Firdiansyah Alhabsyi, and Hijrah Syam. 2022. Semi-structured Interview: A methodological reflection on the development of a qualitative research instrument in educational studies.IOSR Journal of Research & Method in ...

    2022

  74. [82]

    Edward Said. 1995. W. 1978. orientalism.New York: Pantheon(1995)

    1995

  75. [83]

    Nithya Sambasivan and Edward Cutrell. 2012. Understanding negotiation in airtime sharing in low-income microen- terprises. InProceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 791–800

    2012

  76. [84]

    Philipp Schmidt, Felix Biessmann, and Timm Teubner. 2020. Transparency and trust in artificial intelligence systems. Journal of Decision Systems29, 4 (2020), 260–278

    2020

  77. [85]

    Ujjwal Sehrawat, Namit Sawhney, Tejaswini Yeleswarapu, and Nimmi Rangaswamy. 2021. The Everyday HCI of Uber Drivers in India: A Developing Country Perspective. InProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, CSCW, Vol. 5. 1–22

    2021

  78. [86]

    2025.How Social Platforms Have Evolved into E-Commerce Giants

    Lilee shah. 2025.How Social Platforms Have Evolved into E-Commerce Giants. https://armworldwide .com/blog/social- media-marketing/how-social-platforms-have-evolved-into-e-commerce-giants

    2025

  79. [87]

    Hamidreza Shahbaznezhad, Rebecca Dolan, and Mona Rashidirad. 2021. The role of social media content format and platform in users’ engagement behavior.Journal of Interactive Marketing53, 1 (2021), 47–65

    2021

  80. [88]

    2022.Defining Social Commerce in Southeast Asia

    Matias Singers Simon Torring. 2022.Defining Social Commerce in Southeast Asia. https://www .chalawan.asia/post/sea- social-commerce-2022-defining-social-commerce-in-southeast-asia

    2022

  81. [89]

    Munindar P Singh. 2014. Norms as a basis for governing sociotechnical systems.ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (TIST)5, 1 (2014), 1–23

    2014

  82. [90]

    Rakesh Singh, Narendra Kumar, and Sandeep Puri. 2017. Thought self-leadership strategies and sales performance: integrating selling skills and adaptive selling behavior as missing links.Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing32, 5 (2017), 652–663

    2017

  83. [91]

    Gayatri Spivak and R Guha. 2003. Subaltern studies.Deconstruction: Critical concepts in literary and cultural studies4 (2003), 220

    2003

  84. [92]

    Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak et al. 1988. Can the subaltern speak?Can the subaltern speak? Reflections on the history of an idea(1988), 21–78

    1988

  85. [93]

    2024.Social Commerce

    Mastercard Strive. 2024.Social Commerce. https://strivecommunity .org/insights/market-participation/social- commerce

    2024

  86. [94]

    Jubayer Suhan. 2015. Acceptance of online shopping in Bangladesh: Consumer’s perspective.Journal of Business and Management (IOS-JBM), e-ISSN(2015), 14–24

    2015

  87. [95]

    Sharifa Sultana and Syed Ishtiaque Ahmed. 2019. Witchcraft and HCI: Morality, Modernity, and Postcolonial Computing in Rural Bangladesh. InProceedings of the 2019 SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM

    2019

  88. [96]

    Sharifa Sultana and Susan R Fussell. 2021. Dissemination, situated fact-checking, and social effects of misinformation among rural Bangladeshi villagers during the COVID-19 pandemic.Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction5, CSCW2 (2021), 1–34

    2021

  89. [97]

    Sharifa Sultana, Md Mobaydul Haque Mozumder, and Syed Ishtiaque Ahmed. 2021. Chasing Luck: Data-driven Prediction, Faith, Hunch, and Cultural Norms in Rural Betting Practices. InProceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–17

    2021

  90. [98]

    Sharifa Sultana, Zinnat Sultana, and Syed Ishtiaque Ahmed. 2020. Parareligious-HCI: Designing for ’Alternative’ Rationality in Rural Wellbeing in Bangladesh. InExtended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–13

    2020

  91. [99]

    Tahsina Tabassum. 2019. Facebook-Based Women Entrepreneurship in Bangladesh: Opportunities and Challenges. Bangladesh Journal of Public Administration (BJPA)26 (11 2019). https://doi.org/10.36609/bjpa.v26i2.22 , Vol. 1, No. 1, Article . Publication date: September 2024. DAIEM 31

    2019 doi

  92. [100]

    2021.When informal markets go digital: emerging signals from our Lab network

    UNDP. 2021.When informal markets go digital: emerging signals from our Lab network. https://www .undp.org/ acceleratorlabs/blog/when-informal-markets-go-digital-emerging-signals-our-lab-network

    2021

  93. [101]

    2024.Digitalizing Informality

    UNDP. 2024.Digitalizing Informality. https://www.undp.org/acceleratorlabs/our-work/informality

    2024

  94. [102]

    2024.The Barter System: The Genesis of Trade

    Veitopia. 2024.The Barter System: The Genesis of Trade. https://veitopia.com/barter-system-genesis-of-trade/

    2024

  95. [103]

    Valter Afonso Vieira and Danny Pimentel Claro. 2021. Sales prospecting framework: Marketing team, salesperson competence, and sales structure.BAR-Brazilian Administration Review17 (2021), e200025

    2021

  96. [104]

    Warren J Von Eschenbach. 2021. Transparency and the black box problem: Why we do not trust AI.Philosophy & Technology34, 4 (2021), 1607–1622

    2021

  97. [105]

    Hilde AM Voorveld, Guda Van Noort, Daniël G Muntinga, and Fred Bronner. 2018. Engagement with social media and social media advertising: The differentiating role of platform type.Journal of advertising47, 1 (2018), 38–54

    2018

  98. [106]

    2024.How to Pick the Right Messaging App for Customer Service

    Chris Wallbank. 2024.How to Pick the Right Messaging App for Customer Service. https://engagehub .com/how-to- pick-the-right-messaging-app-for-customer-service

    2024

  99. [107]

    2022.Gen Z’s ambition? Create a new fashion system

    Bella Webb. 2022.Gen Z’s ambition? Create a new fashion system. https://www .voguebusiness.com/fashion/gen-zs- ambition-create-a-new-fashion-system-tik-tok-depop-instagram

    2022

  100. [108]

    Max Weber and Surabhi Lal. 2023. Opaque Overwatch: How Food-Delivery Workers Make Sense of Algorithmic Management in the Gig Economy. InAcademy of Management (AOM)

    2023

  101. [109]

    Matthias Weber, Ulrich Remus, and Alexander de Jong. 2023. From Apathy to Algoactivism: Worker Resistance to Algorithmic Control in Food Delivery Platforms. InInternational Conference on Wirtschaftsinformatik. Springer, 131–147

    2023

  102. [110]

    2024.Online outlets prove boon for smaller retailers

    ZHU WENQIAN. 2024.Online outlets prove boon for smaller retailers. https://www .chinadaily.com.cn/a/202403/19/ WS65f8f053a31082fc043bd6fa.html

    2024

  103. [111]

    WIEGO. [n. d.].Occupational Groups in the Informal Economy. https://www .wiego.org/informal-economy/ occupational-groups/

  104. [112]

    2025.Philippine Food Expo 2025: Unlock business opportunities and celebrate unique Filipino fla- vors

    Business World. 2025.Philippine Food Expo 2025: Unlock business opportunities and celebrate unique Filipino fla- vors. https://www .bworldonline.com/spotlight/2025/03/26/661856/philippine-food-expo-2025-unlock-business- opportunities-and-celebrate-unique-filipino-flavors/

    2025

  105. [113]

    Qianye Wu, Chengxuan Xia, and Sixuan Tian. 2025. AI-Driven Sentiment Analytics: Unlocking Business Value in the E-Commerce Landscape_v1.arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.08738(2025)

    2025 arXiv

  106. [114]

    Wyche, Andrea Forte, and Sarita Yardi Schoenebeck

    Susan P. Wyche, Andrea Forte, and Sarita Yardi Schoenebeck. 2013. Hustling Online: Understanding Consolidated Facebook Use in an Informal Settlement in Nairobi. InProceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2823–2832

    2013

  107. [115]

    Qaribu Yahaya Nasidi, Isyaku Hassan, and Muhamad Fazil Ahmad. 2021. Mediating role of social media in the relationship between reliability, perceived usefulness on online shopping behaviour: building a conceptual framework. International Journal of Academic Research in Busines...

    2021

  108. [116]

    2024.TikTok Shop Report: The Future of Social Commerce

    Jacqueline Zote. 2024.TikTok Shop Report: The Future of Social Commerce. https://influencermarketinghub .com/tiktok- shop-report/

    2024

  109. [117]

    Simiao Zuo, Qingyu Yin, Haoming Jiang, Shaohui Xi, Bing Yin, Chao Zhang, and Tuo Zhao. 2022. Context-Aware Query Rewriting for Improving Users’ Search Experience on E-commerce Websites.arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.07584 (2022). , Vol. 1, No. 1, Article . Publication date: September 2024

    2022 arXiv

  110. [2020]

    Academy of Marketing Studies Journal24, 2 (2020), 1–14

    Customer perception on purchasing through Facebook in Bangladesh: An empirical study on Dhaka City. Academy of Marketing Studies Journal24, 2 (2020), 1–14

    2020

  111. [2024]

    InProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

    Under the (neighbor) hood: Hyperlocal Surveillance on Nextdoor. InProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–22

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.