Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 34 references

Effect of surface magnetism on the x-ray spectra of hollow atoms

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper reports that the L-shell filling of hollow argon ions reflects the magnetic phase of a nickel surface, with the ferromagnetic phase blocking filling by the Pauli principle.

desk verdict The observed temperature-dependent KL shift is real, but the surface-magnetism interpretation needs a non-magnetic control or above-TC point before it can be believed. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.15003 v1 pith:MP47OG6A submitted 2025-06-17 physics.atom-ph

P. Dergham , C. Prigent , Ch. V. Ahmad A. Brassart , L. Duval , E. Lamour , S. Macé , S. Steydli , E. M. Tosi
show 2 more authors
D. Vernhet M. Trassinelli
This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.atom-ph
keywords hollowatomssurfacemagnetismhighlychargedionsx-rayspectroscopyPauliexclusionprinciplegrazingincidencenickelferromagnetic-paramagnetictransition
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Slow highly charged ions approaching a surface capture electrons from the first atomic layer into high-lying states, and the x-rays they emit while their inner shells fill carry information about those captured electrons. This paper reports that for Ar17+ ions grazing a nickel surface, the average number of L-shell vacancies extracted from the n=2→1 spectrum falls from 2.4±0.3 at 23°C to 0.8±0.3 at 252°C, implying the n=2 shell goes from half-filled to nearly full as the sample crosses from its ferromagnetic to its paramagnetic phase. The authors argue that in the ferromagnetic phase the Pauli principle blocks the capture of more than four spin-aligned electrons into the L shell, while the loss of spin coherence above the transition lifts that block. If correct, this gives a way to detect surface magnetism without applying any external magnetic field and settles a controversy about whether Auger spectroscopy could do the same.

What carries the argument

The central object is the hollow atom: an ion that captures many electrons into high-n shells while its inner shells remain empty, then relaxes by cascades that end in the radiative n=2→1 (Kα) transitions. The carrying mechanism is the spin-selective electron capture from a ferromagnetic domain: because the captured electrons in a fully polarized domain share one spin orientation, the Pauli principle limits the n=2 population to x=4, whereas a paramagnetic surface supplies both spin orientations and allows filling toward x=8. Quantitatively, the argument rests on a spectral decomposition of the unresolved Kα peak into eight Gaussian components with energies from an empirical formula $E_{K\alpha}=3154.7-26.61x-6.44y+0.467xy+0.438x^2+0.132y^2$ eV, intensities governed by a Poisson distribution of L-shell vacancies $\mu_L$, and the use of grazing incidence to keep the ion above the surface so the capture samples the first atomic layer.

What would settle it

A control experiment on a non-magnetic metal under the same cleaning and temperature protocol should show a temperature-independent μL; if μL still drops, the magnetic interpretation fails. Alternatively, a measurement above the bulk Curie temperature with a detector that can operate there should show μL remaining at its high-temperature floor, confirming the surface transition is already complete.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the occupancy of the n=2 shell of the hollow atom at the moment of x-ray emission is a thermometer for the magnetic order of the topmost surface layer. For Ar17+ at 170 keV grazing a clean Ni(110) surface, the Kα group shifts to lower energy and broadens as the sample temperature rises from 23°C to 252°C. Modelling the spectrum with eight KLx components whose intensities follow a Poisson distribution in the L-shell vacancy number gives an average vacancy count μL that drops from 2.4±0.3 to 0.8±0.3 (for zero n=3 spectators). This is interpreted as evolution from the maximum Pauli-allowed filling x=4 in a ferromagnetic domain to almost complete filling x≈7–8 in the paramagnetic regime, with the transition apparently occurring well below the bulk Curie temperature TC = 354°C. The result would place x-ray spectroscopy of highly charged ions as a field-free probe of surface magnetism, an approach the paper contrasts with the contested Auger-based measurements.

Load-bearing premise

The observed temperature dependence of the x-ray spectra is caused by the magnetic phase of the nickel surface, rather than by other temperature-dependent changes such as work-function shifts, desorption of contaminants, or thermal lattice effects.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the interpretation is right, x-ray emission from highly charged ions offers a field-free probe of the magnetic order of the topmost surface layer, since electron capture happens above the surface.
  • The method bypasses the work-function sensitivity that, according to the paper, undermined the earlier Auger-based attempts, because the recorded x-ray energies are set by the ion's internal level structure rather than by surface emission.
  • The observed saturation of L-shell filling below the bulk Curie temperature implies that the surface magnetic order of Ni(110) disappears before the bulk does, a surface-versus-bulk transition-temperature effect.
  • A high-resolution x-ray spectrometer should resolve individual KLx components and thereby pin down the n=2 population and the number of n=3 spectator electrons, giving timing information about the filling cascade.
  • The same approach could be extended to other magnetic materials and to 2D magnetic systems, where detecting topological magnetic states without external fields is currently difficult.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the magnetic origin is correct, the same temperature cycle on a non-magnetic metal (for example copper) should show no shift in the n=2→1 barycenter; that control is not reported in the paper.
  • The claim that the surface Curie temperature lies well below the bulk value could be tested directly by operating the detector at higher temperatures or with a different detector to reach above TC and checking that μL stays flat.
  • A quantitative prediction hidden in the paper is that the initial capture into high-n states should be largely spin-conserving; testing with spin-polarized ion beams or with circularly polarized detection could isolate the spin-transfer step.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports an experimental study of Ar17+ ions grazing a Ni(110) surface at temperatures between 23 and 252 °C, measuring the Kα x-ray emission. The authors observe a temperature-dependent shift and broadening of the n=2→1 line, which they decompose into eight Gaussian components corresponding to different L-shell occupancies, assuming a Poisson distribution of L-shell vacancies and using an empirical energy formula (Eq. 1). The extracted mean vacancy number μL decreases from 2.4±0.3 at 23 °C to 0.8±0.3 at 252 °C (for zero M-shell occupancy y=0). They interpret this as evidence that in the ferromagnetic phase Pauli exclusion blocks the filling of the n=2 shell to a maximum of four electrons, while in the paramagnetic phase the shell becomes nearly full, and they claim this demonstrates detection of surface magnetism without an external magnetic field, resolving a previous controversy in Auger spectroscopy.

Significance. If the magnetic interpretation is correct, the work introduces a new tool for probing surface magnetism with highly charged ions, with potential advantages over Auger spectroscopy because the x-ray signal is emitted by the projectile and is not directly sensitive to the sample work function. The paper provides a clear raw-data signature (Fig. 1 inset), a transparent decomposition procedure, and an explicit acknowledgment of systematic uncertainties such as the y=0 vs y=8 M-shell ambiguity. However, the central causal claim is not yet established; the observed temperature trend may be explained by other thermally activated processes. As a result, the paper currently delivers an interesting observation rather than a conclusive demonstration.

major comments (3)
  1. [Experimental setup and interpretation] The claim that the temperature dependence of the n=2 population reflects the magnetic phase transition is not supported by a control measurement on a non-magnetic surface or by measurements above the bulk Curie temperature. The authors argue that the x-ray energy is insensitive to work-function changes, but the capture dynamics, the n=3 spectator population, and the cascade timing may still depend on temperature through other mechanisms such as surface contamination, Debye-Waller factor, or thermal lattice vibrations. Without a control experiment (e.g., on Cu(110) or with a magnetically dead overlayer), the observed μL decrease cannot be uniquely attributed to surface magnetism.
  2. [Analysis, Eq. (1) and Fig. 3 inset] The analysis uses two extreme M-shell occupancies y=0 and y=8, and Eq. (1) shows that the Kα energy depends on y through the term -6.44y+0.132y². The inset of Fig. 3 demonstrates that changing y from 0 to 8 increases the extracted μL by about 1.3 vacancies at both temperature extremes. Since the claimed magnetic signal is a change of about 1.6 vacancies (y=0) over the full temperature range, an uncontrolled or temperature-dependent M-shell population could either mimic or obscure the effect. Furthermore, the abstract's statement that the n=2 shell becomes 'full' at high temperature is only valid for y=0; for y=8, the corrected vacancy number μLc=1.7±0.4 at 252 °C corresponds to a partially filled shell (six L electrons), not a full shell. The authors should constrain y from the n=3→1 line shape or demonstrate that the result is insensitive to intermediate y values.
  3. [Interpretation and discussion] The highest measured temperature (252 °C) is well below the bulk Curie temperature TC=354 °C, yet the paper concludes that the surface phase transition has already occurred. This conclusion relies on an analogy with Fe(110) [16] and on simulations of nanowires [35], not on direct evidence for this sample. The data show a monotonic decrease of μL up to 252 °C with no plateau; it is unclear whether the transition is complete at this temperature or whether other temperature-dependent processes are still contributing. A measurement above TC, or a clear kink in the μL(T) curve at a distinct surface transition temperature, would be needed to support the claim that the x-ray spectra track the magnetic order.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract and Conclusion] The phrase 'puts an end to a longstanding controversy' is too strong for a single measurement without a control experiment; a more cautious wording would be appropriate.
  2. [Experimental setup] The statement that the detector window is transparent to infrared radiation and that the resolution increases from 130 eV to 180 eV at 3 keV is given without a reference or a direct measurement; please provide a source or clarify how this was calibrated at each temperature.
  3. [Fig. 3 caption] In the inset, the shaded areas represent the uncertainty; it would be helpful to state whether these are 1σ errors and how they were propagated from the fits.
  4. [Eq. (1)] The empirical energy formula is not accompanied by a comparison of its predictions with the Bhalla tables [32] or with known Kα energies; a brief validation (e.g., a table of energies for a few configurations) would help convince readers that the 30 eV spacing is accurate.
  5. [Data analysis] The Doppler correction is mentioned but not described; please specify the Doppler shift calculation (ion velocity, detection angle) and its expected magnitude relative to the 30 eV line spacing.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the n=2 vacancy count is fitted from the spectra with no magnetic input, the Pauli-blocking prediction is independent and not exactly matched by the fit, and the magnetic attribution is an a posteriori interpretation rather than a premise of the extraction.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained and non-circular. The central observable, the mean number of L-shell vacancies μL(T), is extracted from the measured x-ray spectra by an eight-Gaussian decomposition whose energies come from an external empirical formula (Eq. 1, based on Winecki et al. [11] and Bhalla's tables [32]) and a Poisson intensity distribution (Eq. 2); no magnetic parameter, Curie temperature, or polarization assumption enters the fit. The Pauli-blocking expectation ('a maximum filling of x = 4 electrons is expected due to Pauli exclusion principle') is an independent prediction, and the fitted value at 23°C (μL = 2.4 ± 0.3, i.e., about 5.6 filled L electrons) does not actually reach the predicted half-filled limit, showing the extraction is not constrained to the conclusion. The temperature trend of μL is a reported fit result; the magnetic explanation ('their spin orientation plays a role') is attached after the fact and is a causal hypothesis about the trend, not an input to the spectral fit. Self-citations ([26], SIMPA ion source; [30], angular-calibration method from the authors' own Atoms 2022 paper) are instrumental and technical, not load-bearing for the claim. The below-Curie surface-transition premise is supported by external work (Närmann et al. [16]; Courtès et al. [35] nanowire simulations) rather than by a self-cited uniqueness argument. The paper itself flags limitations: the temperature range stops at 252°C ('the maximum achievable temperature was limited to 252 °C due to degradation of the x-ray detector resolution') and the data are not public. The absence of an above-TC measurement or a non-magnetic control leaves alternative temperature-dependent explanations (work-function changes, contamination, M-shell occupancy y, whose fit sensitivity the authors do quantify) uncontrolled; that is a scientific-correctness concern about causal attribution, not a definitional circularity. Score 1 acknowledges only the minor technical self-citations; no circular step meets the quote-and-reduction evidentiary bar.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The analysis relies on an empirical transition-energy formula, a Poisson ansatz for line intensities, and the assumption that the captured electrons retain the surface spin order. The latter is the core physical premise and is only partially validated. No new particles or forces are introduced.

free parameters (3)
  • Empirical Kα energy coefficients (Eq. 1) = 3154.7, -26.61, -6.44, 0.467, 0.438, 0.132 eV
    Coefficients in Eq. (1) that fix the energies of the eight KLx components; they are adopted from Winecki/Bhalla with refinement, not derived for this experiment. The extracted μL depends on these energies.
  • μL, mean apparent L-shell vacancies = 2.4±0.3 at 23°C, 0.8±0.3 at 252°C for y=0; 3.7±0.5 and 1.8±0.4 for y=8
    The central fitted parameter in each spectrum's Poisson decomposition; its temperature trend is the entire evidence for surface magnetism.
  • Common Gaussian width for the eight components = not reported
    The fit uses eight Gaussians of the same width, but the fitted width values are not reported, making the decomposition partially unspecified.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The classical over-the-barrier model describes resonant electron capture from the surface into high-n states
    Invoked in the introduction (Ref. [4]) to set nc≈18 and the starting point of the hollow atom cascade.
  • domain assumption Electron spin alignment is largely preserved during capture, recapture, and radiative cascade
    The core premise that lets the ion's final L-shell population reflect surface magnetization. It is stated as 'preserve, even partially' and is not quantitatively verified; the observed x>4 at 23°C shows partial violation.
  • ad hoc to paper The L-shell vacancy distribution is Poissonian
    Eq. (2) assumes a Poisson distribution for the number of vacancies, with no derivation. The authors cite qualitative agreement with higher-resolution spectra, but this choice directly shapes the extracted μL and its uncertainty.
  • ad hoc to paper The empirical energy formula Eq. (1) is accurate for the twelve investigated temperatures
    The formula is a fit from literature; its uncertainties are not propagated into the final μL values.
  • domain assumption The spectral shift is dominated by the n=2 population change, not by temperature-dependent detector response or surface work function
    The authors argue x-ray energies are insensitive to work function, but no control experiment verifies that heating itself does not alter the spectrum through other channels.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Effect of surface magnetism on the x-ray spectra of hollow atoms." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/MP47OG6A

@misc{pith2026250615003,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Effect of surface magnetism on the x-ray spectra of hollow atoms},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/MP47OG6A}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.15003}
}
abstract

We present evidence that the detection of surface magnetism without the application of an external magnetic field is possible by studying the x-ray emission of highly charged ions interacting at grazing incidence with the sample. Measuring the 3 keV $n=2 \to 1$ transition in the interaction of Ar\textsuperscript{17+} with a nickel sample at various temperatures gives access to the $n=2$ ion population. The latter evolves from a half-filled to a full shell during the ferro-paramagnetic phase transition of the sample, with the ferromagnetic phase reflecting the filling blocking due to Pauli principle. This finding puts an end to a longstanding controversy arising from contradictory studies of ion--surface interaction using Auger spectroscopy.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.15003 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. X-ray spectra for Ar [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. , the spectral decomposition with y = 0 is pre￾sented in detail for two temperatures (room temperature and T = 252◦C) taking into account the Doppler effect [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Relative intensities of the 8 components used to fit the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

34 extracted references · 34 canonical work pages

  1. [16]

    N ¨armann, M

    A. N ¨armann, M. Dirska, J. Manske, G. Lubinski, M. Schleberger, and R. Hoekstra, Spin-sensitive electron capture into excited states as a probe to investigate mag- netic surfaces, Surf. Sci. 398, 84 (1998)

    work page 1998

  2. [35]

    Court` es, M

    C. Court` es, M. Boileau, R. Cˆ ote, P.-A. Hervieux, and G. Manfredi, Micromagnetic simulations of the size de- pendence of the curie temperature in ferromagnetic nanowires and nanolayers, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 598, 172040 (2024)

    work page 2024

  3. [1]

    Winter and F

    H. Winter and F. Aumayr, Hollow atoms, J. Phys. B 32, R39 (1999)

    work page 1999

  4. [2]

    Winter, Collisions of atoms and ions with surfaces under grazing incidence, Phys

    H. Winter, Collisions of atoms and ions with surfaces under grazing incidence, Phys. Rep. 367, 387 (2002)

    work page 2002

  5. [3]

    R. A. Wilhelm, The charge exchange of slow highly charged ions at surfaces unraveled with freestanding 2D materials, Surf. Sci. Rep. 77, 100577 (2022)

    work page 2022

  6. [4]

    Burgd ¨orfer, P

    J. Burgd ¨orfer, P. Lerner, and F. W. Meyer, Above-surface neutralization of highly charged ions: The classical over- the-barrier model, Phys. Rev. A 44, 5674 (1991)

    work page 1991

  7. [5]

    E. D. Donets, The electron beam method of production of highly charged ions and its applications, Phys. Scr.T3, 11 (1983)

    work page 1983

  8. [6]

    J. P. Briand, L. de Billy, P. Charles, S. Essabaa, P. Briand, R. Geller, J. P. Desclaux, S. Bliman, and C. Ristori, Production of hollow atoms by the excita- tion of highly charged ions in interaction with a metallic surface, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 159 (1990)

    work page 1990

Show all 34 references
  1. [7]

    Winter and F

    H. Winter and F. Aumayr, Interaction of slow HCI with solid surfaces: What do we know, what should we know?, Phys. Scr. 2001, 15 (2001)

    2001

  2. [8]

    Briand, G

    J.-P. Briand, G. Giardino, G. Borsoni, M. Froment, M. Eddrief, C. S´ ebenne, S. Bardin, D. Schneider, J. Jin, H. Khemliche, Z. Xie, and M. Prior, Decay of hollow atoms above and below a surface, Phys. Rev. A 54, 4136 (1996)

    1996

  3. [9]

    d’Etat, J

    B. d’Etat, J. P. Briand, G. Ban, L. de Billy, J. P. De- sclaux, and P. Briand, Interaction of ar17+ ions on metal- lic surfaces at grazing incidence, Phys. Rev. A 48, 1098 (1993)

    1993

  4. [10]

    M. Werl, T. Koller, P. Haidegger, S. Wrathall, L. Eßlet- zbichler, A. Niggas, F. Aumayr, K. T˝ ok´ esi, and R. A. Wilhelm, Lifetime of a freely decaying hollow atom, Phys. Rev. Res. 7, 013176 (2025)

    2025

  5. [11]

    Winecki, C

    S. Winecki, C. L. Cocke, D. Fry, and M. P. St ¨ockli, Neu- tralization and equilibration of highly charged argon ions at grazing incidence on a graphite surface, Phys. Rev. A 53, 4228 (1996)

    1996

  6. [12]

    B. J.-P, S. Thuriez, G. Giardino, G. Borsoni, M. Froment, M. Eddrief, and C. S´ ebenne, Observation of hollow atoms or ions above insulator and metal surfaces, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 1452 (1996)

    1996

  7. [13]

    Pfandzelter, T

    R. Pfandzelter, T. Bernhard, and H. Winter, Spin- polarized electrons in collisions of multicharged nitrogen ions with a magnetized Fe(001) surface, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 4152 (2001)

    2001

  8. [14]

    Winter, H

    H. Winter, H. Hagedorn, R. Zimny, H. Nienhaus, and J. Kirschner, Polarized light emission after grazing ion- surface scattering due to capture of spin-polarized elec- trons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 296 (1989)

    1989

  9. [15]

    N ¨armann, M

    A. N ¨armann, M. Schleberger, W. Heiland, C. Huber, and J. Kirschner, Emission of polarized light by slow ions after excitation near a magnetic surface, Surf. Sci.251-252, 248 (1991)

    1991

  10. [17]

    Unipan, D

    M. Unipan, D. F. A. Winters, A. Robin, R. Morgenstern, and R. Hoekstra, Surface spin polarization in fe(110) and ni(110), Nucl. Instrum. Methods B 230, 356 (2005)

    2005

  11. [18]

    Unipan, A

    M. Unipan, A. Robin, D. F. A. Winters, R. Morgenstern, and R. Hoekstra, Probing local spin ordering at surfaces by He2+ ions, Phys. Rev. A 74, 062901 (2006)

    2006

  12. [19]

    Unipan, A

    M. Unipan, A. Robin, R. Morgenstern, and R. Hoek- stra, Local spin polarization at surfaces probed by hollow atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 177601 (2006)

    2006

  13. [20]

    Busch, S

    M. Busch, S. Wethekam, and H. Winter, Reexamination of local spin polarization at surfaces probed by hollow atoms, Phys. Rev. A 78, 010901 (2008)

    2008

  14. [21]

    Busch, S

    M. Busch, S. Wethekam, and H. Winter, Effects of ad- sorbates on the formation of doubly excited He atoms during impact of He 2+ ions on Fe(110) and Ni(110) sur- faces, Surf. Sci. 605, 733 (2011)

    2011

  15. [22]

    More precisely, Busch and collaborators claimed that the intensity changes observed by Unipan et al. were not caused by changes of the sample magnetic order but most probably by the effects stemming from desorption and dissolution processes of surface oxygen contamina- tion an...

  16. [23]

    Donath, V

    M. Donath, V. Dose, K. Ertl, and U. Kolac, Polarization effects in inverse-photoemission spectra from ni(110), Phys. Rev. B 41, 5509 (1990)

    1990

  17. [24]

    Van der Laan, M

    G. Van der Laan, M. Hoyland, M. Surman, C. Flipse, 6 and B. Thole, Surface orbital magnetic moment of ferro- magnetic nickel studied by magnetic circular dichroism in Ni 3 p core level photoemission, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 3827 (1992)

    1992

  18. [25]

    Mittendorfer, A

    F. Mittendorfer, A. Eichler, and J. Hafner, Structural, electronic and magnetic properties of nickel surfaces, Surf. Sci. 423, 1 (1999)

    1999

  19. [26]

    Gumberidze, M

    A. Gumberidze, M. Trassinelli, N. Adrouche, C. I. Szabo, P. Indelicato, F. Haranger, J.-M. Isac, E. Lamour, E.-O. Le Bigot, J. M´ erot, C. Prigent, J.-P. Rozet, and D. Vern- het, Electronic temperatures, densities, and plasma x-ray emission of a 14.5 GHz electron-cyclotron res...

    2010 doi

  20. [27]

    Rayspec x-ray detector model 881-3711-1A

  21. [29]

    This operation was done in a regular base after the col- lision with the ions to limit the contamination form the heating preparation chamber elements before the inter- action with the ions

  22. [30]

    Dergham, F

    P. Dergham, F. Aumayr, E. Lamour, S. Mac´ e, C. Prigent, S. Steydli, D. Vernhet, M. Werl, R. A. Wilhelm, and M. Trassinelli, Toward probing surface magnetism with highly charged ions, Atoms 10, 151 (2022)

    2022

  23. [31]

    Note that the resolution was checked at each temperature thanks to the presence of low-energy fluorescence lines

  24. [32]

    C. P. Bhalla, K-shell auger rates, transition energies, and fluorescence yields of variously ionized states of argon, Phys. Rev. A 8, 2877 (1973)

    1973

  25. [33]

    J. P. Briand and M. Benhachoum, X-ray characterization of surfaces irradiated with highly charged ions, Nucl. In- strum. Methods B 267, 665 (2009)

    2009

  26. [34]

    F. P. Larkins, Dependence of fluorescence yield on atomic configuration, J. Phys. B 4, L29 (1971)

    1971

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.