Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 142 references

Multiwavelength study of observed and predicted pulsation properties of First overtone Cepheids in the Magellanic Clouds

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read First-overtone Cepheids in the Magellanic Clouds show statistically significant break-points near 2.5 days in period-colour, period-luminosity, and amplitude-colour relations, plus a 0.58-day break for LMC stars, so the relations need…

desk verdict A solid multiwavelength extension of known FO Cepheid break-points with a large but preliminary MESA-RSP grid, whose central statistical claim is weakened by data-driven break-point selection tested with fixed-location F-tests. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.15171 v1 pith:PSW6SW2S submitted 2025-06-18 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.SR

Kerdaris Kurbah , Shashi M. Kanbur , Sukanta Deb , Anupam Bhardwaj , Mami Deka , Susmita Das , Gautam Bhuyan This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GAastro-ph.SR
keywords first-overtoneCepheidsMagellanicCloudsperiod-colourrelationperiod-luminosityamplitude-colourbreak-pointspiecewiseregressionstellarpulsationmodels
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that first-overtone Cepheids in the Magellanic Clouds do not obey single straight-line period–colour, period–luminosity, or amplitude–colour relations. Using de-reddened optical, near-infrared, and space-based photometry, it finds statistically significant break-points near a period of $P \simeq 2.5$ d in seven bands for both clouds, and an additional break-point near $P \simeq 0.58$ d for LMC stars, with unusually flat period–colour slopes between 0.58 and 2.5 days. The same break-point structure appears in a large grid of non-linear radial pulsation models, which supports the interpretation that these are real features of stellar pulsation rather than artifacts of the data. If correct, distance calibrations and pulsation models that rely on single linear relations over the full period range would need to be revised.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by segmented (piecewise) regression with an F-test that compares a single straight line against two lines separated at a fitted break-point, applied to mean-light colours and magnitudes in seven bands; the statistical machinery identifies the break locations and the F-test decides significance. On the theoretical side, the machinery is a grid of about one thousand non-linear, full-amplitude stable pulsation models computed for LMC and SMC chemical compositions with two convective parameter sets, from which the same PC/PL/AC relations are built and compared to observations using $t$-tests on slopes. The physical link connecting the relations is the Stefan–Boltzmann relation $\log T_{\max} - \log T_{\min} = (V_{\max}-V_{\min})/10$, which connects a flat period–colour relation to the observed amplitude–colour correlations at maximum and minimum light.

What would settle it

Recompute the period–colour, period–luminosity, and amplitude–colour relations using an independent reddening estimate (for example, per-star spectral-energy-distribution fits or a different reddening map) and check whether the F-test still rejects a single straight line at $P \simeq 2.5$ d and $P \simeq 0.58$ d; an even cleaner test would be a larger sample of SMC first-overtone Cepheids with $P < 0.58$ d, since the paper notes that only about 2% of its SMC sample lies there, so the absence of a 0.58-d break in the SMC is currently underpowered.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that the period–colour, period–luminosity, and amplitude–colour relations of first-overtone Cepheids in the LMC and SMC are piecewise rather than single straight lines. Piecewise regression identifies break-points near $P = 2.5$ d across all seven photometric bands ($V$, $I$, $G$, $G_{RP}$, $Y$, $J$, $K_s$), with the exact location varying slightly from band to band (for example, 2.39–2.75 d in the SMC), and F-tests reject the single-line null hypothesis at the 95% confidence level for most colour indices and bands. For LMC first-overtone Cepheids, a further break-point near $P = 0.58$ d appears in the $V$, $I$, $Y$, $J$, and $K_s$ bands, and the period–colour slopes in the interval $0.58 < P < 2.5$ d are shallow in $V-I$, $V-G$, and $V-G_{RP}$ while steeper outside. Non-linear full-amplitude pulsation models with two convection prescriptions reproduce the break near $P = 2.5$ d in the theoretical PC/PL/AC relations, and the observed flat PC slope is tied to the narrow width of the colour–magnitude diagram in that period range.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing assumption is that the adopted reddening map and the fixed extinction law with $R_V = 3.23$ correctly de-redden every star; if the true reddening is systematically different for Magellanic Cloud stars, the colours and magnitudes shift and the break-points could move or disappear.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Distance moduli derived from first-overtone Cepheid period–luminosity relations must use separate calibrations for $P < 2.5$ d and $P > 2.5$ d, and for LMC stars also for $P < 0.58$ d, otherwise the distance scale will carry a systematic bias.
  • The break near $P = 2.5$ d is a physical feature of first-overtone pulsation, not an artifact of the samples, because non-linear models with the same convection physics reproduce it in the theoretical PC/PL/AC relations.
  • The SMC's first-overtone Cepheids have systematically higher $V$-band amplitudes than the LMC's (mean amplitude about 0.47 mag versus two LMC components near 0.30 and 0.38 mag), supporting a metallicity–amplitude connection across the Clouds.
  • The flat period–colour slope of LMC first-overtone Cepheids between $0.58$ and $2.5$ days implies a narrow colour–magnitude-diagram width in that interval: stars there share nearly the same colour despite different periods and magnitudes.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the break-points are real, then single-slope period–luminosity calibrations for first-overtone Cepheids in other metal-poor galaxies would also be biased; re-fitting published PL relations piecewise could shift distance estimates to the LMC and SMC by a few percent, which matters for the local distance ladder.
  • The band-to-band variation of the break location (about 2.39–2.75 d in the SMC) suggests the transition is gradual rather than a sharp period cut; a testable extension is to check whether the break position tracks the wavelength-dependent depth of the hydrogen ionization front or the $P_1/P_4 = 2$ resonance near $P \simeq 4$ d.
  • The paper excludes theoretical models with $P < 0.58$ d; extending the same non-linear grid to shorter periods would show whether the 0.58-d break is also present in the models, providing a sharper test of the proposed first-to-second-crossing explanation.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper presents a multiwavelength empirical and theoretical study of first-overtone (FO) Cepheids in the Large and Small Magellanic Clouds. The observational analysis uses OGLE-IV optical, Gaia DR3, and VMC near-infrared light curves, with Fourier decomposition, 3-sigma clipping, and dereddening via the Skowron et al. (2021) map and a Cardelli et al. (1989) law. The authors fit period-amplitude, period-colour, period-luminosity, and amplitude-colour relations at maximum, minimum, and mean light, and use piecewise regression with F-tests to claim statistically significant break-points near P=2.5 d and P=0.58 d, with shallow period-colour slopes for LMC FO Cepheids in 0.58<P<2.5 d. They complement this with ~1,200 nonlinear full-amplitude MESA-RSP FO models using four convection sets and compare model predictions with observations, also computing evolutionary tracks to interpret the short-period break-point.

Significance. If the claimed break-points are robust, the piecewise nature of the PC/PL/AC relations is important both for Cepheid distance calibration and for testing pulsation theory, and the paper would provide a useful multiwavelength dataset and a large FO model grid. The empirical analysis exploits high-quality public data and applies standard Fourier and regression tools, and some fixed-location tests (e.g., P=2.5 d and P=0.58 d) are statistically significant even under conventional assumptions. The theoretical model grid is one of the larger FO grids computed with MESA-RSP, and the authors make inlists available on GitHub. However, the central significance claims are weakened by the use of an F-test critical value that is not valid when the break-point is estimated from the same data, and the t-test formula used for model-observation slope comparisons appears to contain a sign error.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 3, Tables C1-C4 and Tables 4-6] The statistical significance of the data-driven break-points is overstated because the F-test is evaluated at break-point locations selected from the same data. The paper states 'F_c = F_{2,n-4}' and rejects the null when p(F)<0.05, but this is only valid for a pre-specified break-point. The piecewise-regression Model Selection routine chooses the break-point by optimizing the fit, so the maximized F statistic follows the sup-F/Davies distribution, whose critical values are larger. Consequently, entries such as P=2.440 d with p(F)=0.000 and P=2.576 d with p(F)=0.000 in Tables 4, 5, C1, and C3 are anti-conservative. The fixed-location tests at P=2.5 d and P=0.58 d (included for comparative purposes in the Appendix tables) remain valid, but the paper's headline claims of 'multiple break-points' and the data-driven locations are not supported as reported. The authors should re-analyse with a sup-F test, a Davies bound, or a bootstrap procedure that accounts for break-point estimation, or restrict significance claims to fixed, pre-specified periods.
  2. [Section 3, Eq. (3)] The two-sample t-test formula for comparing regression slopes is incorrect as printed: the denominator is written as sqrt(Var(W_n) - Var(W_m)), but the correct form is sqrt(Var(W_n) + Var(W_m)) (or an appropriate pooled standard error). With the printed minus sign, the denominator can be zero or negative, producing undefined or misleading t-statistics. This formula underlies the slope comparisons in Tables D1 and D2 and the supplementary material, so the reported p(t) values need to be recomputed after correcting this error.
  3. [Section 2.2, Table 3 and Section 3.2.2] The theoretical support for the break-point claims is weaker than the abstract's language suggests. The authors state that the model grid does not encompass the full instability strip, that theoretical PC/PL/AC relations are 'preliminary', and that models with P<0.58 d are omitted because of small numbers. As a result, the theoretical models cannot test the P=0.58 d break-point, and the 'confirmation' of the P=2.5 d break-point is obtained by imposing a break-point near 2.5 d rather than detecting it from the model data. This should be stated explicitly in the abstract and conclusions, and the claims of model confirmation should be tempered accordingly.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 2.2] The description of the convection sets contains a duplicated parameter: 'a_t = 0.0, a_t = 0.0, gamma_r = 0.0' appears for both Set A and Set B; the second parameter should presumably be a different quantity (e.g., a_p or a_c). Please check and clarify.
  2. [Summary vs. Section 2.2] The abstract/conclusions mention MESA-RSP 'version r15410', while Section 2.2 states 'r15140'; please verify which version was used and make the text consistent.
  3. [Appendix B, Fig. B2] The y-axis limits of Fig. B2 for the SMC include negative values (approximately -0.1 to 0.1), but p(F) is a probability and cannot be negative; this makes the plotted p(F) values unreadable and may indicate an axis scaling error.
  4. [Section 3.1] The text says that high-amplitude SMC FO Cepheids are found at a mean of V-I = 0.467 mag, but 0.467 mag is also reported as the mean of the V-band amplitude distribution. Please confirm which quantity is intended for the colour.
  5. [Appendix C tables] Several entries report p(F)=0.000, which is numerically implausible; these should be reported as p<0.001, and any p-values obtained after the corrected break-point testing procedure should replace them.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

Break-point 'significance' partly reuses the same data that selected the break-point; fixed-period tests remain valid.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section 3, paragraph on F-test; Tables 4-6; Appendix C (Tables C1-C3)]
    "The significance of the break-points at multiple locations obtained using piecewise regression has been tested using a statistical F-test. ... The critical value of the F statistic at 95% confidence level is defined as F_c = F_{2,n-4}. ... The remaining rows represent the F-test result for break-points obtained using piecewise regression."

    The breakpoint locations are fitted to the same data by piecewise regression (e.g., 2.440, 2.466, 2.576 d in Tables 4/6 and C1/C3), and the F-test is then evaluated at these fitted locations using the fixed-breakpoint critical value F_{2,n-4}. Because the breakpoint was chosen to maximize the fit, the resulting F statistic is the maximum over candidate breakpoints and has the sup-F/Davies distribution under the null hypothesis; comparing with F_{2,n-4} makes p(F) systematically too small. The reported p(F)=0.000 values for data-driven breakpoints therefore present a fitted parameter as if it were an independently tested prediction.

full rationale

The theoretical modeling side is self-contained: MESA-RSP models use the Anderson et al. (2014) mass-luminosity relation, Paxton et al. (2019) convection sets, and an internally calibrated alpha_m; no observed PC/PL/AC slope is fed back into the models as a constraint, and the appearance of a break-point near 2.5 d in the models is an independent result. The empirical detection at the literature periods 2.5 d and 0.58 d is supported by fixed-location F-tests, which are not circular. The partial circularity lies in the data-driven break-point locations: the paper selects each break-point by maximizing the piecewise-regression fit to the same data and then tests that same fitted location with an F-test whose null distribution assumes a pre-specified break-point. This inflates the reported significance and makes the 'multiple break-point' claim partly an artifact of fitting. No self-citation is load-bearing, and the model-data comparison is not inverted from the data it claims to predict.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The empirical claims rest on public photometry with standard Fourier analysis. The model grid imports a literature mass-luminosity relation, convection parameter sets, and IS edges; no new entities or forces are introduced. The main free parameter is alpha_m, tuned to match observed amplitudes.

free parameters (1)
  • alpha_m (turbulent convection parameter) = 0.25 for set A, 0.50 for set B, 0.40 for set C, 0.70 for set D
    In Section 2.2, alpha_m is adjusted so that models with different convection sets have similar amplitudes, directly affecting the predicted amplitude-related relations (AC, PA).
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Anderson et al. (2014) rotation-averaged mass-luminosity relation is used to assign luminosity to each model mass.
    Used in Section 2.2 to place models in the HR diagram; errors in the ML relation propagate into the theoretical PL and PC relations.
  • domain assumption The four convection parameter sets A-D from Paxton et al. (2019) adequately describe turbulent convection in FO Cepheid envelopes.
    The entire model grid depends on these convection treatments; the paper notes they are merely starting choices and calibration is needed.
  • domain assumption The Skowron et al. (2021) reddening map and Cardelli et al. (1989) extinction law with R_V=3.23 are correct for the Magellanic Clouds.
    Applied to all observed photometry in Section 2.1.4 before fitting any relation; systematic reddening errors would bias break-point positions.
  • domain assumption The instability strip edges adopted from Deka et al. (2024) and Espinoza-Arancibia et al. (2024) correctly mark the FO Cepheid instability strip.
    Used to interpret the CMD positions of models and observations; if the edges are wrong, the evolutionary interpretation of the 0.58 d break changes.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Multiwavelength study of observed and predicted pulsation properties of First overtone Cepheids in the Magellanic Clouds." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/PSW6SW2S

@misc{pith2026250615171,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Multiwavelength study of observed and predicted pulsation properties of First overtone Cepheids in the Magellanic Clouds},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/PSW6SW2S}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.15171}
}
read the original abstract

We present a detailed analysis of the light curves and pulsation properties of First Overtone (FO) Cepheids in the Magellanic Clouds (MCs) obtained using observations and predictions from stellar pulsation models. Multiwavelength observational light curves were compiled from the literature (OGLE-IV, Gaia and VMC). We investigate the period-amplitude (PA), period-colour (PC), period-luminosity (PL), and amplitude-colour (AC) relations for FO Cepheids at multiwavelengths. We find that the PA distribution of FO Cepheids in the MCs modelled using a Gaussian Mixture Model shows that the SMC consists of higher amplitude stars than the LMC. We find multiple break-points in the PC/PL/AC relations for FO/FU Cepheids in the optical and near-infrared bands including the one near to P = 2.5 d in the MCs using piecewise regression analysis and F- test statistics. Similarly, for the LMC FO Cepheids, we find a break-point in the PC/PL/AC relations near P = 0.58 d. The slopes of the PC relations for LMC FO Cepheids are found to be shallow for 0.58 < P(d) < 2.5 but steeper for P < 0.58 d and P > 2.5 d. We complemented the observed relations using theoretical models for FO Cepheids with chemical compositions Z = 0.008 and Z = 0.004, appropriate for the LMC and SMC, respectively computed with MESA-RSP. Our results show that the pulsation properties of FO Cepheids in PC/PL/AC relations and colour-magnitude diagram are strongly correlated and their connections can provide stringent constraints for the theoretical pulsation models.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.15171 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Left Panel: Period-Wesenheit relations for FU/FO Cepheids in the LMC and SMC. Middle Panel: Magnitude residuals for the I-band PL relations (Δ𝐼0) and PW relations (Δ𝑊) for the same. Right Panel: CMD diagram for the same. Orange and light green are the FU and FO Cepheids in the LMC. Black dots in all the plots are the discarded data points that deviate by more than 3 sigma. (0.556, 0.810, 0.673, 0.797, 1.020, 1.254, … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Fitted light curves for three LMC Cepheids in multiple bands (𝑉 𝐼𝐺𝐺𝑅𝑃𝑌 𝐽𝐾 𝑠). The star IDs consisting of four numbers are based on the OGLE-IV catalogue. Black dots in all the plots represent the observed data and the red star symbol represents the outliers. The solid red line represents the template fit for near-infrared bands (𝑌 𝐽𝐾 𝑠) and Fourier fit for optical bands (𝑉 𝐼𝐺𝐺𝑅𝑃). from Espinoza-Arancibia et al. (202… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. CMD for LMC and SMC FO Cepheids obtained using the observations and models. The IS edges are taken from Deka et al. (2024) and Espinoza￾Arancibia et al. (2024) . and 𝑈𝐵𝑉 𝑅𝐼𝐽𝐻𝐾 𝐿𝐿′𝑀 photometric bands (Lejeune et al. 1998). Similarly, we additionally included the bolometric correction table from MIST 2 (mesa Isochrones & Stellar Tracks) packaged model grid (Choi et al. 2016; Dotter 2016) in mesa to transform the bolo￾… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (8 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Left Panel: PA distribution for the LMC (upper) and SMC (lower) FO Cepheids in 𝑉-band. Middle Panel: Histogram of PA distribution is modelled using a Gaussian Mixture Model. The mean of the Gaussian fits for the FO Cepheids in the LMC/SMC in 𝑉-band are centered at (0.2…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Normalized light curves using Set D (maroon colour) and observa￾tions (grey dots) in multiple bands (𝑉 𝐼𝐺𝐺𝑅𝑃 𝐽𝐾 𝑠). The input parameters of the model, 𝑍 = 0.008, 𝑋 = 0.742, 𝑀/𝑀⊙ = 5.0, 𝐿/𝐿⊙ = 3400, 𝑇𝑒 𝑓 𝑓 = 5420. observed ones. Observations clearly show a dip in 𝑅𝑘1 va…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Fourier parameters for LMC (left panel) and SMC (right panel) FO Cepheids obtained from the observations in 𝑉, 𝐼, 𝐺-bands. The FPs shown are evaluated using sliding mean values with steps of 0.05 dex in log 𝑃 and a bin width of 0.1 dex. The vertical dashed blue lines i…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Fourier amplitude parameters for observed and theoretical light curves for FO Cepheids in the LMC and SMC. Light orange colour represents the observations. Grey and blue colours represent sets B and D, respectively. The vertical dashed lines (cyan) indicate log 𝑃 = −0.…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Left Panel: PC relations for LMC and SMC FO Cepheids using 𝑉, 𝐼-bands. Sky blue, light purple and orange represent the PC relations at maximum/minimum/mean light. Right Panel: Same as the left panel but for AC. Navy blue represents the star with P > 2.5 d in both cases…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: PL relations for LMC FO Cepheids using Set D with period 𝑃 > 0.58 d in 𝑉 𝐼𝐺𝐺𝑅𝑃 𝐽𝐾 𝑠 photometric bands. Blue represents the models with 𝑃 < 2.5 d and orange represents the models with 𝑃 > 2.5 d. The significance of the break-point at 𝑃 = 2.5 d is determined using the s…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: CMD of LMC FO Cepheids for 𝑉 and 𝐼 bands. The FO Cepheids samples are binned according to their periods, and the mean color indices and absolute magnitudes within each bin are computed and plotted on the CMD. These mean values are represented by red circles. Solid bla…
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Evolutionary tracks of Cepheids shown from zero age main sequence to core He exhaustion composition for LMC (left panel) and SMC (right panel) in the CMD plane. The tracks are computed for masses (2 − 6) 𝑀⊙ in steps of 1 𝑀⊙. The tracks are overplotted with the CMD of …

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

142 extracted references · 26 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    I., Ekstr \"o m S., Georgy C., Meynet G., Mowlavi N., Eyer L., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201322988 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014A&A...564A.100A 564, A100

    Anderson R. I., Ekstr \"o m S., Georgy C., Meynet G., Mowlavi N., Eyer L., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201322988 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014A&A...564A.100A 564, A100

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322988 2014

  2. [2]

    Antonello E., Aikawa T., 1993, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1993A&A...279..119A 279, 119

    1993

  3. [3]

    L., 1982, j-IMA-J-NUMER-ANAL, 2, 241

    Baart M. L., 1982, j-IMA-J-NUMER-ANAL, 2, 241

    1982

  4. [4]

    Bai J., 1997, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 79, 551

    1997

  5. [5]

    L., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1007/s11214-018-0542-1 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018SSRv..214..113B 214, 113

    Beaton R. L., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1007/s11214-018-0542-1 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018SSRv..214..113B 214, 113

    doi:10.1007/s11214-018-0542-1 2018

  6. [6]

    S., 1990, @doi [ ] 10.1086/132749 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1990PASP..102.1181B 102, 1181

    Bessell M. S., 1990, @doi [ ] 10.1086/132749 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1990PASP..102.1181B 102, 1181

    doi:10.1086/132749 1990

  7. [7]

    M., Singh H

    Bhardwaj A., Kanbur S. M., Singh H. P., Ngeow C.-C., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stu1941 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.445.2655B 445, 2655

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stu1941 2014

  8. [8]

    M., Macri L

    Bhardwaj A., Kanbur S. M., Macri L. M., Singh H. P., Ngeow C.-C., Ishida E. E. O., 2016a, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw040 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.457.1644B 457, 1644

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stw040

Show all 142 references
  1. [9]

    M., Singh H

    Bhardwaj A., Ngeow C.-C., Kanbur S. M., Singh H. P., 2016b, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw579 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.458.3705B 458, 3705

    doi

  2. [10]

    M., Rejkuba M., Kanbur S

    Bhardwaj A., Macri L. M., Rejkuba M., Kanbur S. M., Ngeow C.-C., Singh H. P., 2017a, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/aa5e4f , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017AJ....153..154B 153, 154

    doi

  3. [11]

    M., Marconi M., Rejkuba M., Singh H

    Bhardwaj A., Kanbur S. M., Marconi M., Rejkuba M., Singh H. P., Ngeow C.-C., 2017b, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw3256 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.466.2805B 466, 2805

    doi

  4. [12]

    J., Singh H

    Bhardwaj A., Rejkuba M., de Grijs R., Herczeg G. J., Singh H. P., Kanbur S., Ngeow C.-C., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/abb3f9 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020AJ....160..220B 160, 220

    2020 doi

  5. [13]

    M., Bellinger E

    Bhuyan G., Deb S., Kanbur S. M., Bellinger E. P., Deka M., Bhardwaj A., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad3772 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.527.8671B 527, 8671

    2024 doi

  6. [14]

    Z., et al., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/140/2/416 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010AJ....140..416B 140, 416

    Bonanos A. Z., et al., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/140/2/416 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010AJ....140..416B 140, 416

    2010 doi

  7. [15]

    Bono G., Caputo F., Marconi M., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1086/311270 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998ApJ...497L..43B 497, L43

    1998 doi

  8. [16]

    F., 1999a, @doi [ ] 10.1086/313207 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999ApJS..122..167B 122, 167

    Bono G., Marconi M., Stellingwerf R. F., 1999a, @doi [ ] 10.1086/313207 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999ApJS..122..167B 122, 167

    doi

  9. [17]

    Bono G., Caputo F., Castellani V., Marconi M., 1999b, @doi [ ] 10.1086/306815 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999ApJ...512..711B 512, 711

    doi

  10. [18]

    F., 2000a, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000A&A...360..245B 360, 245

    Bono G., Marconi M., Stellingwerf R. F., 2000a, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000A&A...360..245B 360, 245

  11. [19]

    F., 2000b, @doi [ ] 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0006229 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000A&A...360..245B 360, 245

    Bono G., Marconi M., Stellingwerf R. F., 2000b, @doi [ ] 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0006229 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000A&A...360..245B 360, 245

    doi arXiv

  12. [20]

    Bono G., Castellani V., Marconi M., 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1086/339420 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002ApJ...565L..83B 565, L83

    2002 doi

  13. [21]

    G., Kervella P., Anderson R

    Breuval L., Riess A. G., Kervella P., Anderson R. I., Romaniello M., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac97e2 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...939...89B 939, 89

    2022 doi

  14. [22]

    R., Koll \'a th Z., 2000, in Buchler J

    Buchler J. R., Koll \'a th Z., 2000, in Buchler J. R., Kandrup H., eds, Vol. 898, Astrophysical Turbulence and Convection. p. 39 ( @eprint arXiv astro-ph/9909024 ), @doi 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2000.tb06162.x

    2000 arXiv

  15. [23]

    R., Kovacs G., 1986, @doi [ ] 10.1086/164122 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1986ApJ...303..749B 303, 749

    Buchler J. R., Kovacs G., 1986, @doi [ ] 10.1086/164122 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1986ApJ...303..749B 303, 749

    1986 doi

  16. [24]

    R., Moskalik P., Kovacs G., 1990, @doi [ ] 10.1086/168500 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1990ApJ...351..617B 351, 617

    Buchler J. R., Moskalik P., Kovacs G., 1990, @doi [ ] 10.1086/168500 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1990ApJ...351..617B 351, 617

    1990 doi

  17. [25]

    R., Koll \'a th Z., Beaulieu J

    Buchler J. R., Koll \'a th Z., Beaulieu J. P., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20047105 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004A&A...423..643B 423, 643

    2004 doi

  18. [26]

    J., 1976, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1976A&AS...24..299B 24, 299

    Butler C. J., 1976, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1976A&AS...24..299B 24, 299

    1976

  19. [27]

    J., 1978, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1978A&AS...32...83B 32, 83

    Butler C. J., 1978, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1978A&AS...32...83B 32, 83

    1978

  20. [28]

    A., Clayton G

    Cardelli J. A., Clayton G. C., Mathis J. S., 1989, @doi [ ] 10.1086/167900 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1989ApJ...345..245C 345, 245

    1989 doi

  21. [29]

    R., Capitanio N., 1993, @doi [ ] 10.1086/191790 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1993ApJS...86..541C 86, 541

    Chiosi C., Wood P. R., Capitanio N., 1993, @doi [ ] 10.1086/191790 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1993ApJS...86..541C 86, 541

    1993 doi

  22. [30]

    D., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/823/2/102 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...823..102C 823, 102

    Choi J., Dotter A., Conroy C., Cantiello M., Paxton B., Johnson B. D., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/823/2/102 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...823..102C 823, 102

    2016 doi

  23. [31]

    Choi Y., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aae083 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...866...90C 866, 90

    2018 doi

  24. [32]

    Cioni M. R. L., et al., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201016137 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011A&A...527A.116C 527, A116

    2011 doi

  25. [33]

    C., 1980, @doi [ ] 10.1086/158182 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1980ApJ...239..941C 239, 941

    Cogan B. C., 1980, @doi [ ] 10.1086/158182 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1980ApJ...239..941C 239, 941

    1980 doi

  26. [34]

    Cusano F., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab901 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.504....1C 504, 1

    2021 doi

  27. [35]

    M., Singh H

    Das S., Bhardwaj A., Kanbur S. M., Singh H. P., Marconi M., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty2358 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.481.2000D 481, 2000

    2018 doi

  28. [36]

    Das S., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa182 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.493...29D 493, 29

    2020 doi

  29. [37]

    M., Smolec R., Bhardwaj A., Singh H

    Das S., Kanbur S. M., Smolec R., Bhardwaj A., Singh H. P., Rejkuba M., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa3694 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.501..875D 501, 875

    2021 doi

  30. [38]

    arXiv:2401.11869

    Das S., et al., 2024, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2401.11869 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv240111869D p. arXiv:2401.11869

    2024 doi arXiv

  31. [39]

    De Somma G., Marconi M., Molinaro R., Cignoni M., Musella I., Ripepi V., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/ab7204 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJS..247...30D 247, 30

    2020 doi

  32. [40]

    De Somma G., Marconi M., Molinaro R., Ripepi V., Leccia S., Musella I., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/ac7f3b , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJS..262...25D 262, 25

    2022 doi

  33. [41]

    P., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/200912851 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009A&A...507.1729D 507, 1729

    Deb S., Singh H. P., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/200912851 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009A&A...507.1729D 507, 1729

    2009 doi

  34. [42]

    P., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stt2361 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.438.2440D 438, 2440

    Deb S., Singh H. P., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stt2361 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.438.2440D 438, 2440

    2014 doi

  35. [43]

    P., Kumar S., Kanbur S

    Deb S., Singh H. P., Kumar S., Kanbur S. M., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv358 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.449.2768D 449, 2768

    2015 doi

  36. [44]

    M., Singh H

    Deb S., Ngeow C.-C., Kanbur S. M., Singh H. P., Wysocki D., Kumar S., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty1124 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.478.2526D 478, 2526

    2018 doi

  37. [45]

    P., Kanbur S

    Deb S., Kurbah K., Singh H. P., Kanbur S. M., Ngeow C.-C., Medhi B. J., Kumar S., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz2328 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.489.3725D 489, 3725

    2019 doi

  38. [46]

    M., Deb S., Das S., Kurbah K., Bellinger E

    Deka M., Kanbur S. M., Deb S., Das S., Kurbah K., Bellinger E. P., Bhardwaj A., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac2457 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.517.2251D 517, 2251

    2022 doi

  39. [47]

    P., Kanbur S

    Deka M., Bellinger E. P., Kanbur S. M., Deb S., Bhardwaj A., Randall H. R., Kalici S., Das S., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae1136 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.tmp.1147D

    2024 doi

  40. [48]

    A., Feuchtinger M

    Dorfi E. A., Feuchtinger M. U., 1991, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1991A&A...249..417D 249, 417

    1991

  41. [49]

    Dotter A., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0067-0049/222/1/8 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJS..222....8D 222, 8

    2016 doi

  42. [50]

    M., 2024, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2406.09127 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv240609127D p

    Drimmel R., Khanna S., Poggio E., Skowron D. M., 2024, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2406.09127 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv240609127D p. arXiv:2406.09127

    2024 doi arXiv

  43. [52]

    Espinoza-Arancibia F., Pilecki B., Pietrzy \'n ski G., Smolec R., Kervella P., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202347804 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...682A.185E 682, A185

    2024 doi

  44. [53]

    D., 1970, @doi [ ] 10.1086/150569 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1970ApJ...161..679F 161, 679

    Fernie J. D., 1970, @doi [ ] 10.1086/150569 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1970ApJ...161..679F 161, 679

    1970 doi

  45. [54]

    D., 1990, @doi [ ] 10.1086/168689 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1990ApJ...354..295F 354, 295

    Fernie J. D., 1990, @doi [ ] 10.1086/168689 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1990ApJ...354..295F 354, 295

    1990 doi

  46. [55]

    U., 1999a, @doi [ ] 10.1051/aas:1999462 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999A&AS..136..217F 136, 217

    Feuchtinger M. U., 1999a, @doi [ ] 10.1051/aas:1999462 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999A&AS..136..217F 136, 217

    doi

  47. [56]

    U., 1999b, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999A&A...351..103F 351, 103

    Feuchtinger M. U., 1999b, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999A&A...351..103F 351, 103

  48. [57]

    R., Koll \'a th Z., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1086/317260 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000ApJ...544.1056F 544, 1056

    Feuchtinger M., Buchler J. R., Koll \'a th Z., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1086/317260 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000ApJ...544.1056F 544, 1056

    2000 doi

  49. [58]

    Fiorentino G., Marconi M., Musella I., Caputo F., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20077587 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007A&A...476..863F 476, 863

    2007 doi

  50. [59]

    Gaia Collaboration et al., 2016a, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201629272 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016A&A...595A...1G 595, A1

    doi

  51. [60]

    Gaia Collaboration et al., 2016b, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201629512 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016A&A...595A...2G 595, A2

    doi

  52. [61]

    Gaia Collaboration et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202243940 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...674A...1G 674, A1

    2023 doi

  53. [62]

    Graczyk D., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/abbb2b , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJ...904...13G 904, 13

    2020 doi

  54. [63]

    K., Duffau S., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/144/4/107 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012AJ....144..107H 144, 107

    Haschke R., Grebel E. K., Duffau S., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/144/4/107 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012AJ....144..107H 144, 107

    2012 doi

  55. [64]

    Inno L., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/764/1/84 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...764...84I 764, 84

    2013 doi

  56. [65]

    Inno L., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/832/2/176 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...832..176I 832, 176

    2016 doi

  57. [66]

    Iwanek P., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/ac6676 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJS..260...46I 260, 46

    2022 doi

  58. [67]

    Jordi C., et al., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201015441 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010A&A...523A..48J 523, A48

    2010 doi

  59. [68]

    M., Hendry M

    Kanbur S. M., Hendry M. A., 1996, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996A&A...305....1K 305, 1

    1996

  60. [69]

    S., Perryman M

    Kanbur S., Ngeow C., 2005, in Turon C., O'Flaherty K. S., Perryman M. A. C., eds, ESA Special Publication Vol. 576, The Three-Dimensional Universe with Gaia. p. 691

    2005

  61. [70]

    M., Ngeow C.-C., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10317.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006MNRAS.369..705K 369, 705

    Kanbur S. M., Ngeow C.-C., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10317.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006MNRAS.369..705K 369, 705

    2006

  62. [71]

    M., Ngeow C., Nikolaev S., Tanvir N

    Kanbur S. M., Ngeow C., Nikolaev S., Tanvir N. R., Hendry M. A., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20031373 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003A&A...411..361K 411, 361

    2003 doi

  63. [72]

    M., Ngeow C.-C., Buchler J

    Kanbur S. M., Ngeow C.-C., Buchler J. R., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08183.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004MNRAS.354..212K 354, 212

    2004

  64. [73]

    M., Ngeow C., Nanthakumar A., Stevens R., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/519290 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007PASP..119..512K 119, 512

    Kanbur S. M., Ngeow C., Nanthakumar A., Stevens R., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/519290 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007PASP..119..512K 119, 512

    2007 doi

  65. [74]

    Kanbur S. M., Marconi M., Ngeow C., Musella I., Turner M., James A., Magin S., Halsey J., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17159.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010MNRAS.408..695K 408, 695

    2010

  66. [75]

    Kienzle F., Moskalik P., Bersier D., Pont F., 1999, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999A&A...341..818K 341, 818

    1999

  67. [76]

    Klagyivik P., Szabados L., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/200811464 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009A&A...504..959K 504, 959

    2009 doi

  68. [77]

    R., Feuchtinger M., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1086/309330 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000ApJ...540..468K 540, 468

    Koll \'a th Z., Buchler J. R., Feuchtinger M., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1086/309330 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000ApJ...540..468K 540, 468

    2000 doi

  69. [78]

    B., Nuspl J., Szab \'o R., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad884 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.521.4878K 521, 4878

    Kov \'a cs G. B., Nuspl J., Szab \'o R., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad884 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.521.4878K 521, 4878

    2023 doi

  70. [79]

    B., Nuspl J., Szab \'o R., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnrasl/slad131 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.527L...1K 527, L1

    Kov \'a cs G. B., Nuspl J., Szab \'o R., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnrasl/slad131 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.527L...1K 527, L1

    2024 doi

  71. [80]

    Kuhfuss R., 1986, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1986A&A...160..116K 160, 116

    1986

  72. [81]

    M., Das S., Deka M., Bhardwaj A., Randall H

    Kurbah K., Deb S., Kanbur S. M., Das S., Deka M., Bhardwaj A., Randall H. R., Kalici S., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad806 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.521.6034K 521, 6034

    2023 doi

  73. [82]

    L., 1970, SAO Special Report, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1970SAOSR.309.....K 309

    Kurucz R. L., 1970, SAO Special Report, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1970SAOSR.309.....K 309

    1970

  74. [83]

    Kurucz R., 1993, Robert Kurucz CD-ROM, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1993KurCD..18.....K 18

    1993

  75. [84]

    S., 1908, Annals of Harvard College Observatory, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1908AnHar..60...87L 60, 87

    Leavitt H. S., 1908, Annals of Harvard College Observatory, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1908AnHar..60...87L 60, 87

    1908

  76. [85]

    S., Pickering E

    Leavitt H. S., Pickering E. C., 1912, Harvard College Observatory Circular, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1912HarCi.173....1L 173, 1

    1912

  77. [86]

    Lejeune T., Cuisinier F., Buser R., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1051/aas:1998405 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998A&AS..130...65L 130, 65

    1998 doi

  78. [87]

    Lemasle B., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202243273 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022A&A...668A..40L 668, A40

    2022 doi

  79. [88]

    Leys C., Ley C., Klein O., Bernard P., Licata L., 2013, @doi [Journal of Experimental Social Psychology] https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.03.013 , 49, 764

    2013 doi

  80. [89]

    F., 1976, The Observatory, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1976Obs....96..245M 96, 245

    Madore B. F., 1976, The Observatory, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1976Obs....96..245M 96, 245

    1976

  81. [90]

    F., Freedman W

    Madore B. F., Freedman W. L., 1991, @doi [ ] 10.1086/132911 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1991PASP..103..933M 103, 933

    1991 doi

  82. [91]

    F., Freedman W

    Madore B. F., Freedman W. L., Moak S., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aa6e4d , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...842...42M 842, 42

    2017 doi

  83. [92]

    Majaess D., Turner D., Gieren W., Berdnikov L., Lane D., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1007/s10509-012-1331-z , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013Ap&SS.344..381M 344, 381

    2013 doi

  84. [93]

    Marconi M., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/768/1/L6 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...768L...6M 768, L6

    2013 doi

  85. [94]

    Marconi M., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae734 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.529.4210M 529, 4210

    2024 doi

  86. [95]

    H., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202039512 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021A&A...654A.138M 654, A138

    Minniti J. H., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202039512 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021A&A...654A.138M 654, A138

    2021 doi

  87. [96]

    I., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stt2081 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.437.2702M 437, 2702

    Moretti M. I., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stt2081 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.437.2702M 437, 2702

    2014 doi

  88. [97]

    R., Marom A., 1992, @doi [ ] 10.1086/170975 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1992ApJ...385..685M 385, 685

    Moskalik P., Buchler J. R., Marom A., 1992, @doi [ ] 10.1086/170975 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1992ApJ...385..685M 385, 685

    1992 doi

  89. [98]

    Muraveva T., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx2514 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.473.3131M 473, 3131

    2018 doi

  90. [99]

    R., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aa713d , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...841...84N 841, 84

    Neeley J. R., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aa713d , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...841...84N 841, 84

    2017 doi

  91. [100]

    M., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/720/1/626 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...720..626N 720, 626

    Ngeow C.-C., Kanbur S. M., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/720/1/626 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...720..626N 720, 626

    2010 doi

  92. [101]

    M., Singh H

    Ngeow C.-C., Sarkar S., Bhardwaj A., Kanbur S. M., Singh H. P., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/813/1/57 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...813...57N 813, 57

    2015 doi

  93. [102]

    J., Keller S

    Nikolaev S., Drake A. J., Keller S. C., Cook K. H., Dalal N., Griest K., Welch D. L., Kanbur S. M., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1086/380439 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004ApJ...601..260N 601, 260

    2004 doi

  94. [103]

    Paxton B., Bildsten L., Dotter A., Herwig F., Lesaffre P., Timmes F., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0067-0049/192/1/3 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJS..192....3P 192, 3

    2011 doi

  95. [104]

    Paxton B., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0067-0049/208/1/4 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJS..208....4P 208, 4

    2013 doi

  96. [105]

    Paxton B., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0067-0049/220/1/15 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJS..220...15P 220, 15

    2015 doi

  97. [106]

    Paxton B., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/aaa5a8 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJS..234...34P 234, 34

    2018 doi

  98. [107]

    Paxton B., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/ab2241 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJS..243...10P 243, 10

    2019 doi

  99. [108]

    O., 1986, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1986A&A...170...59P 170, 59

    Petersen J. O., 1986, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1986A&A...170...59P 170, 59

    1986

  100. [109]

    Pietrukowicz P., Soszy \'n ski I., Udalski A., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.32023/0001-5237/71.3.2 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021AcA....71..205P 71, 205

    2021 doi

  101. [110]

    Pietrzy \'n ski G., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1038/s41586-019-0999-4 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019Natur.567..200P 567, 200

    2019 doi

  102. [111]

    Pilgrim C., 2021, @doi [Journal of Open Source Software] 10.21105/joss.03859 , 6, 3859

    2021 doi

  103. [113]

    G., et al., 2022b, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ac5c5b , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...934L...7R 934, L7

    Riess A. G., et al., 2022b, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ac5c5b , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...934L...7R 934, L7

    doi

  104. [114]

    Ripepi V., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0067-0049/224/2/2110.48550/arXiv.1602.09005 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJS..224...21R 224, 21

    2016

  105. [115]

    Ripepi V., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx2096 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.472..808R 472, 808

    2017 doi

  106. [116]

    Ripepi V., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac595 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.512..563R 512, 563

    2022 doi

  107. [117]

    A., 1971, @doi [ ] 10.1086/151031 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1971ApJ...167..293S 167, 293

    Sandage A., Tammann G. A., 1971, @doi [ ] 10.1086/151031 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1971ApJ...167..293S 167, 293

    1971 doi

  108. [118]

    A., 1993, @doi [ ] 10.1086/173137 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1993ApJ...415....1S 415, 1

    Sandage A., Tammann G. A., 1993, @doi [ ] 10.1086/173137 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1993ApJ...415....1S 415, 1

    1993 doi

  109. [119]

    A., Reindl B., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20040222 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004A&A...424...43S 424, 43

    Sandage A., Tammann G. A., Reindl B., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20040222 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004A&A...424...43S 424, 43

    2004 doi

  110. [120]

    A., Reindl B., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:200810550 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009A&A...493..471S 493, 471

    Sandage A., Tammann G. A., Reindl B., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:200810550 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009A&A...493..471S 493, 471

    2009 doi

  111. [121]

    R., 1985, @doi [ ] 10.1086/163737 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1985ApJ...299..723S 299, 723

    Simon N. R., 1985, @doi [ ] 10.1086/163737 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1985ApJ...299..723S 299, 723

    1985 doi

  112. [122]

    R., Schmidt E

    Simon N. R., Schmidt E. G., 1976, @doi [ ] 10.1086/154259 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1976ApJ...205..162S 205, 162

    1976 doi

  113. [123]

    R., Kanbur S

    Simon N. R., Kanbur S. M., Mihalas D., 1993, @doi [ ] 10.1086/173077 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1993ApJ...414..310S 414, 310

    1993 doi

  114. [124]

    M., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.32023/0001-5237/69.4.1 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019AcA....69..305S 69, 305

    Skowron D. M., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.32023/0001-5237/69.4.1 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019AcA....69..305S 69, 305

    2019 doi

  115. [125]

    M., et al., 2021, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series] 10.3847/1538-4365/abcb81 , 252, 23

    Skowron D. M., et al., 2021, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series] 10.3847/1538-4365/abcb81 , 252, 23

    2021 doi

  116. [126]

    Smolec R., Moskalik P., 2008, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008AcA....58..193S 58, 193

    2008

  117. [127]

    Smolec R., Moskalik P., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201014494 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010A&A...524A..40S 524, A40

    2010 doi

  118. [128]

    A., Catelan M., eds, IAU Symposium Vol

    Soszy \'n ski I., 2024, in de Grijs R., Whitelock P. A., Catelan M., eds, IAU Symposium Vol. 376, IAU Symposium. pp 48--67, @doi 10.1017/S1743921323002557

    2024 doi

  119. [129]

    Soszy \'n ski I., et al., 2015, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015AcA....65..297S 65, 297

    2015

  120. [130]

    Soszy \'n ski I., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.32023/0001-5237/67.2.1 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017AcA....67..103S 67, 103

    2017 doi

  121. [131]

    S., 1969, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/144.4.485 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1969MNRAS.144..485S 144, 485

    Stobie R. S., 1969, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/144.4.485 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1969MNRAS.144..485S 144, 485

    1969 doi

  122. [132]

    Subramanian S., Subramaniam A., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/744/2/128 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...744..128S 744, 128

    2012 doi

  123. [133]

    Subramanian S., Subramaniam A., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201424248 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015A&A...573A.135S 573, A135

    2015 doi

  124. [134]

    Szabados L., Klagyivik P., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201117815 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012A&A...537A..81S 537, A81

    2012 doi

  125. [135]

    A., Sandage A., Reindl B., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20030354 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003A&A...404..423T 404, 423

    Tammann G. A., Sandage A., Reindl B., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20030354 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003A&A...404..423T 404, 423

    2003 doi

  126. [136]

    A., Reindl B., Sandage A., 2011, @doi [aap] 10.1051/0004-6361/201016382 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011A&A...531A.134T 531, A134

    Tammann G. A., Reindl B., Sandage A., 2011, @doi [aap] 10.1051/0004-6361/201016382 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011A&A...531A.134T 531, A134

    2011 doi

  127. [137]

    L., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa3857 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.504.2983T 504, 2983

    Tatton B. L., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa3857 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.504.2983T 504, 2983

    2021 doi

  128. [138]

    G., Abdel-Sabour Abdel-Latif M., Berdnikov L

    Turner D. G., Abdel-Sabour Abdel-Latif M., Berdnikov L. N., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/499501 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006PASP..118..410T 118, 410

    2006 doi

  129. [139]

    Wang S., Chen X., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab1c61 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...877..116W 877, 116

    2019 doi

  130. [140]

    Yanchulova Merica-Jones P., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/abc48b , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...907...50Y 907, 50

    2021 doi

  131. [141]

    A., Kollath Z., Buchler J

    Yecko P. A., Kollath Z., Buchler J. R., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9804124 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998A&A...336..553Y 336, 553

    1998 doi arXiv

  132. [142]

    S., Hocd \'e V., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/ad614d , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJS..274...30Z 274, 30

    Zi \'o kowska O., Smolec R., Thoul A., Farrell E., Rathour R. S., Hocd \'e V., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/ad614d , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJS..274...30Z 274, 30

    2024 doi

  133. [143]

    P., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/abe1bb , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...910...36Z 910, 36

    Zivick P., Kallivayalil N., van der Marel R. P., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/abe1bb , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...910...36Z 910, 36

    2021 doi

  134. [144]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION fin.entry write newline FUNCTION new.block output.state before.all = 'skip after.block 'output.state := if FUNCTION new.sentence output.state after.block = 'skip output.state before.all = 'skip after.sentence 'output.stat...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.