Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 45 references

The superposition principle for the continuity equation with singular flux

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Bounded-variation measure flows still admit a superposition principle, provided the singular flux is made minimal.

desk verdict A substantial and mostly rigorous extension of the superposition principle to BV curves and singular fluxes, but the main theorems are stated for arbitrary norms while the proofs only handle strictly convex norms; that gap needs fixing. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.15333 v1 pith:75ECLKHW submitted 2025-06-18 math.AP math.PR

Stefano Almi , Riccarda Rossi , Giuseppe Savaré This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.APmath.PR MSC 35F2549Q2228A33
keywords continuityequationsingularfluxBVcurvessuperpositionprincipleWassersteinspaceminimalaugmentedphasemeasure-valuedsolutions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Solving the continuity equation for probability measures with a singular flux—one not absolutely continuous in time-space—looks like it should break the classical superposition principle, which represents the solution as an average of characteristic curves. This paper establishes that the principle survives in the bounded-variation, p=1 setting: every solution pair (μ,ν) can, after replacing the singular part of ν by a minimal flux, be written as the projection of an auxiliary continuity equation in an augmented phase space driven by a bounded autonomous velocity field. From that auxiliary equation the authors obtain two probabilistic representations: one by reparametrized 1-Lipschitz curves solving the characteristic system ẏ=(τ(y),v(y)), and one by augmented BV curves that explicitly resolve the trajectory followed during each jump. The singular part of the flux is thereby translated into the Cantor and jump parts of the random BV curves, with jumps directed by the singular flux. A sympathetic reader would care because this converts a purely Eulerian evolution law with irregular flux into a Lagrangian particle picture, the missing tool for many measure-valued PDE applications.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by three objects: the submeasure order ζ≺θ, meaning ζ=λθ for a Borel [0,1]-valued function λ, which selects minimal singular fluxes by minimizing |ζ| among submeasures with the same divergence; the augmented phase space I×R^d with artificial time s, in which the pair (μ,ν) is lifted to a solution σ of ∂sσ+∂tσ0+div σ=0 with a normalized autonomous velocity field (τ,v)=d(μ,ν)/d|(μ,ν)|; and the evaluation and projection maps that push η on Lipschitz curves back to (μ,ν). The bridge to BV curves is the class ABV of continuous maps u on the ordered parameter space I×[0,1] whose slices u(t,·) are constant except at jump times, where they are Lipschitz transition curves of constant speed; composing the reparametrization maps T and S converts arc-length Lipschitz trajectories into augmented BV curves without losing information. The crucial work of these objects is to carry the Eulerian singular flux information into Lagrangian jump transitions.

What would settle it

In R² with the ℓ∞ norm, run the construction of Theorem 4.7 on the minimal pair μ_t=(1−t)δ_{(0,0)}+tδ_{(1,1)}, ν=L¹|[0,1]⊗L¹|segment, and check whether the minimal flux is unique and whether the projection identity π♯σ=ν holds for every weak-∗ limit σ. If uniqueness or the identity fails, the Euclidean-norm reduction is load-bearing and the stated generality is false.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that the pairing of a BV curve μ∈BV_loc(I;P1(R^d)) with a flux ν in ∂tμ+div ν=0 is not an obstruction to particle representations if ν is minimal. Theorem 5.1 asserts that for any P1-solution (μ,ν), after replacing ν by a minimal pair (μ,ν̄) with ν̄⊥≺ν⊥, there exists a probability measure η on reparametrized Lipschitz curves y=(t,x) with t(0)=0, t increasing to +∞, satisfying μ=e♯(t′η_L), ν̄=e♯(x′η_L), |(μ,ν̄)|=e♯(‖y′‖η_L), and η-a.e. curve solves y′(s)=(τ(y(s)),v(y(s))), y(0)=(0,x), where (τ,v) is the density of (μ,ν) with respect to |(μ,ν)|. Theorem 6.5 then gives a companion representation by a probability measure on augmented BV curves in which the absolutely continuous, Cantor, and jump parts obey explicit equations and the jump transitions follow the direction of ν⊥. Theorems 5.3 and 5.4 add fine structure: representing curves are injective under minimality, and when the sharp variation identity (3.7) holds, jump transitions are straight segments at constant speed.

Load-bearing premise

The reduction to a strictly convex (Euclidean) norm is declared without a full proof, and minimality, uniqueness of minimal fluxes, and polar decomposition arguments depend on strict convexity; if the norm is not strictly convex, the equivalence steps in Theorem 4.7 can fail.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Every minimal P1-solution, including jump discontinuities, has a Lagrangian interpretation: η is concentrated on injective curves, so mass does not split and rejoin except as a measure-averaged superposition.
  • The absolutely continuous part of the flux is produced only along strictly increasing time segments (t′>0), while the singular part is produced on flat time segments (t′=0), giving a clean geometric split of νa and ν⊥.
  • When the sharp condition (3.7) holds, jumps are straight-line transitions at constant speed, so the BV metric variation matches the average Euclidean length of jump paths.
  • The BV representation gives direct formulas for the left and right limits μ−_t and μ+_t as the marginals of u(t,0) and u(t,1), allowing jump size to be read off from the path measure.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper's examples show minimality is sufficient but not necessary; a natural next test is to identify the exact class of nonminimal pairs that still admit a representation, conjecturally those whose singular flux is reachable by flat-time trajectory segments.
  • The D+/D0 decomposition of trajectories suggests an estimation scheme for empirical data: given a time series of measures, infer the distribution of jump-start times and jump paths from the singular flux, then compare with η's marginals.
  • If the strict-convexity reduction fails for non-Euclidean norms, the augmented BV representation may still hold but with non-unique minimal fluxes; checking the ℓ∞ norm would settle whether uniqueness is essential or merely technical.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies measure-valued solutions (µ,ν) to the continuity equation ∂tµ+divν=0 in [0,∞)×R^d, where µ is a curve of probability measures with finite first moment and ν is a Radon vector flux. It characterizes BV curves in (P1,W1) through such equations, selects minimal singular fluxes, constructs an auxiliary continuity equation in an augmented phase space driven by a bounded autonomous vector field, and derives two probabilistic representations: one by reparametrized Lipschitz curves (Theorem 5.1) and one by augmented BV curves with explicit absolutely continuous, Cantor, and jump parts (Theorem 6.5). The paper includes detailed proofs, several appendices, and examples illustrating the role of the minimality condition.

Significance. If correct, the paper provides a substantial and natural extension of the classical superposition principle to the BV and p=1 setting with singular fluxes. The minimal-flux selection and the augmented-phase-space method are original and likely to be useful for evolutionary PDEs, gradient flows, and optimal transport applications. The statements are precise, the proofs are detailed, and Section 7 carefully discusses the sharpness of the hypotheses through examples (e.g., Examples 7.2 and 7.3). The use of the classical superposition principle [11] is an external, standard tool and does not introduce circularity. The main reservations concern norm-dependence in the proof of Theorem 4.7 and a missing justification in the decomposition step of Proposition 5.2.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4.2, Theorem 4.7 (proof)] The proof begins with the declaration 'it is not restrictive to assume that ϱ=|(µ,ν)|, ||·|| is the Euclidean norm ..., and θ≡1'. The first and third reductions are legitimate, but the Euclidean-norm reduction is not justified by Lemma 4.6 alone, which only rescales the velocity field by a positive factor. The objects |(µ,ν)|, W1, the minimality condition (1.13), and the submeasure relation ≺ all depend on the chosen norm. Lemma 2.2(iii), which is used in the proof of Lemma 2.7 to pass from (2.24)–(2.25) to the conclusion λj≺λ, is false for non-strictly convex norms: taking the ℓ∞ norm on R^2 with θ=(1,0)δ, ζ=(1/2,1/2)δ and ζC=(1/2,-1/2)δ gives θ=ζ+ζC and |θ|∞=|ζ|∞+|ζC|∞, yet ζ is not a scalar multiple of θ. Since Lemma 2.7 is the step that identifies the projected limit as a submeasure of (µ,ν) in Theorem 4.7, the proof as written establishes the augmented representation only for strictly convex (in particular Euclidean) norms. The authors should either supply the missing norm-invariance argument (e.g., prove the Euclidean case and then apply Lemma 4.6 with θ = ||(τ_E,v_E)||_orig^{-1}, after observing that minimality and ≺ are invariant under equivalent norms) or restrict the statements of Theorems 5.1 and 6.5 to strictly convex norms.
  2. [§5.1, Proposition 5.2] In the proof of (5.11), the statement 'Since νa≪µ and D0∩D+=∅, the second and third equalities follow' is not sufficient: a point (t,x) may be reached at D+-times by some curves and at D0-times by others, so the supports of e♯(x′ηL|D0) and e♯(t′ηL|D+) need not be disjoint merely because D0 and D+ are disjoint in the (s,y) domain. The missing argument is that the curves solve the autonomous system (5.7a), so that τ>0 on the former image and τ=0 on the latter, making the images disjoint up to negligible sets. As written, this step is incomplete, and it is used later in the proof of Theorem 5.3 and consequently in Theorem 6.5.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§2.2, Lemma 2.7] The proof uses the same symbol λj both for the vector measure in (2.17) and for the positive limit in (2.20)–(2.25); this makes the argument very hard to follow and should be corrected with distinct notation.
  2. [§3, Theorem 3.4(1)] The phrase 'in the sense of Definition 3.2. 2.3.' contains a stray '2.3.' and should be cleaned up.
  3. [§6.3, Theorem 6.5, Eq. (6.27a)] The formula has a duplicated parenthesis in v(t,u(t,r)))/τ(...); also, the equality with dνa/dµ should be interpreted on the set where τ>0, which deserves a brief remark.
  4. [Appendix A, Lemma A.1(3)] The proof invokes 'We can select the Euclidean norm' although the lemma is stated for a strictly convex norm; this is acceptable, but the assumption should be relaxed or the wording clarified, since Claims (1) and (3) do not require strict convexity.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the augmented-equation lifting is self-contained, and the unproved Euclidean-norm reduction is a correctness gap rather than a circular step.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation is constructive rather than circular. Starting from a P1-solution and a chosen minimal flux, Theorem 4.7 regularizes the pair, solves the augmented characteristic system, and passes to the limit; Theorem 5.1 then obtains the parametrized superposition representation by projecting the augmented solution and applying the standard superposition principle to the augmented, absolutely continuous equation. The target quantities mu, nu-bar, and |(mu,nu-bar)| are outputs of this projection, not inputs: minimality is used only to select a distinguished flux and to identify the limiting projection in Theorem 4.7 via Lemma 2.7, not to define the representation itself. The reliance on [11], co-authored by one of the present authors, is to a classical externally established superposition principle applied to a different equation in the augmented phase space; it is parameter-free and its assumptions do not contain the paper's p=1/BV conclusion, so the self-citation is not load-bearing. The main caveat is the declaration in the proof of Theorem 4.7 that 'it is not restrictive to assume that ... ||.|| is the Euclidean norm', together with the strict-convexity hypotheses in Lemma 2.2(iii), Lemma 2.7, and Lemma A.1. This is a genuine unproved generality gap and a correctness risk for arbitrary norms, but it is not circular: the Euclidean-norm case is proved independently, and no claimed equality reduces to its own assumption or to a fitted parameter. Accordingly, no circular step is identified.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces mathematical constructs such as minimal submeasures, the augmented phase space, and augmented BV curves, but these are not new physical entities. They are defined rigorously within the proof, and no independent empirical falsification is applicable. The ledger is therefore empty of free parameters and invented entities; the axioms listed are the standard measure-theoretic and optimal-transport background results used as black boxes, plus the strict-convexity condition on the norm.

assumptions (6)
  • standard math Classical superposition principle for absolutely continuous solutions of the continuity equation, [11, Thm. 8.2.1]
    Used in Theorem 4.5(2) to lift augmented solutions on finite intervals to Lipschitz trajectories, then glued with Lemma C.1 to obtain a global measure on paths.
  • standard math Disintegration theorem for Radon measures with respect to the time projection
    Used in Lemma 3.7 and Lemma 3.8 to write μ=L^1⊗μ_t and to select good left and right continuous representatives of the curve.
  • standard math Hahn-Banach and Riesz representation theorems for constructing the flux measure from a bounded linear functional on gradients
    Used in the proof of Theorem 3.4(1), around equations (3.24)-(3.26), to produce a vector measure ν_{a,b} with prescribed divergence and controlled total variation.
  • standard math Weak* compactness and lower semicontinuity of total variation for locally finite vector measures
    Used in Corollary 2.6, Lemma 2.7, and Theorem 4.7 Step 3 to pass to limits while preserving submeasure relations and divergence constraints.
  • domain assumption Strict convexity of the norm on R^d, or reduction to the Euclidean norm
    Lemma 2.2(iii), Lemma A.1, uniqueness in Theorem 3.4, and the projection identity in Theorem 4.7 require strict convexity. The proof of Theorem 4.7 assumes the Euclidean norm after declaring it non-restrictive, but the reduction is not fully detailed.
  • standard math Countable glueing lemma for probability measures on path spaces
    Used in Theorem 4.5(2) and Appendix C to combine local representations on intervals [i,i+1] into a single probability measure η on Lip↑_k(I;R^{d+1}_+).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The superposition principle for the continuity equation with singular flux." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/75ECLKHW

@misc{pith2026250615333,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The superposition principle for the continuity equation with singular flux},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/75ECLKHW}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.15333}
}
abstract

Representation results for absolutely continuous curves $\mu:[0,T]\to \mathcal{P}_p(\mathbb{R}^d)$, $p>1$, with values in the Wasserstein space $(\mathcal{P}_p(\mathbb{R}^d),W_p)$ of Borel probability measures in $\mathbb{R}^d$ with finite $p$-moment, provide a crucial tool to study evolutionary PDEs in a measure-theoretic setting. They are strictly related to the superposition principle for measure-valued solutions to the continuity equation. This paper addresses the extension of these results to the case $p=1$, and to curves $\mu:[0,+\infty)\to\mathcal{P}_1(\mathbb{R}^d)$ that are only of bounded variation in time: in the corresponding continuity equation, the flux measure $\nu\in\mathcal{M}_{loc}([0,+\infty)\times\mathbb{R}^{d};\mathbb{R}^{d})$ thus possesses a non-trivial singular part w.r.t. $\mu$ in addition to the absolutely continuous part featuring the velocity field. Firstly, we carefully address the relation between curves in ${\rm BV}_{loc}([0,+\infty);\mathcal{P}_1(\mathbb{R}^d))$ and solutions to the associated continuity equation, among which we select those with minimal singular (contribution to the) flux $\nu$. We show that, with those distinguished solutions it is possible to associate an `auxiliary' continuity equation, in an augmented phase space, solely driven by its velocity field. For that continuity equation, a standard version of the superposition principle can be thus obtained. In this way, we derive a first probabilistic representation of the pair $(\mu,\nu)$ solutions by projection over the time and space marginals. This representation involves Lipschitz trajectories in the augmented phase space, reparametrized in time and solving the characteristic system of ODEs. Finally, for the same pair $(\mu,\nu)$ we also prove a superposition principle in terms of BV curves on the actual time interval, providing a fine description of their behaviour at jump points.

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 44 canonical work pages

  1. [11]

    Ambrosio, N

    L. Ambrosio, N. Gigli, and G. Savar ´e, Gradient flows in metric spaces and in the space of probability measures , Lectures in Mathematics ETH Z¨ urich, Birkh¨ auser Verlag, Basel, second ed., 2008

    work page 2008

  2. [1]

    Abedi, Z

    E. Abedi, Z. Li, and T. Schultz , Absolutely continuous and BV-curves in 1-Wasserstein spaces , Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations, 63 (2024), pp. Paper No. 16, 34

    work page 2024

  3. [2]

    G. Albi, S. Almi, M. Morandotti, and F. Solombrino, Mean-field selective optimal control via transient leadership, Applied Math. & Optim., 85 (2022), p. 22

    work page 2022

  4. [3]

    S. Almi, M. Morandotti, and F. Solombrino , A multi-step Lagrangian scheme for spatially inhomogeneous evolu- tionary games, J. Evol. Equ., 21 (2021), pp. 2691–2733

    work page 2021

  5. [4]

    S. Almi, M. Morandotti, and F. Solombrino , Optimal control problems in transport dynamics with additive noise , J. Differential Equations, 373 (2023), pp. 1–47

    work page 2023

  6. [5]

    Ambrosio, Transport equation and Cauchy problem for BV vector fields, Invent

    L. Ambrosio, Transport equation and Cauchy problem for BV vector fields, Invent. Math., 158 (2004), pp. 227–260

    work page 2004

  7. [6]

    Ambrosio and P

    L. Ambrosio and P. Bernard, Uniqueness of signed measures solving the continuity equation for Osgood vector fields, Atti Accad. Naz. Lincei Rend. Lincei Mat. Appl., 19 (2008), pp. 237–245

    work page 2008

  8. [7]

    Ambrosio and G

    L. Ambrosio and G. Crippa , Existence, uniqueness, stability and differentiability properties of the flow associated to weakly differentiable vector fields , in Transport equations and multi-D hyperbolic conservation laws, vol. 5 of Lect. Notes Unione Mat. Ital., Springer, Berlin, 2008, pp. 3–57

    work page 2008

Show all 45 references
  1. [8]

    Ambrosio and A

    L. Ambrosio and A. Figalli , On flows associated to Sobolev vector fields in Wiener spaces: an approach ` a la DiPerna-Lions, J. Funct. Anal., 256 (2009), pp. 179–214

    2009

  2. [9]

    Ambrosio, M

    L. Ambrosio, M. Fornasier, M. Morandotti, and G. Savar´e, Spatially inhomogeneous evolutionary games, Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 74 (2021), pp. 1353–1402

    2021

  3. [10]

    Ambrosio, N

    L. Ambrosio, N. Fusco, and D. Pallara, Functions of Bounded Variation and Free Discontinuity Problems, Oxford University Press, 2005

    2005

  4. [12]

    Ambrosio, N

    L. Ambrosio, N. Gigli, and G. Savar ´e, Calculus and heat flow in metric measure spaces and applications to spaces with Ricci bounds from below , Invent. Math., 195 (2014), pp. 289–391

    2014

  5. [13]

    Ambrosio, S

    L. Ambrosio, S. Lisini, and G. Savar ´e, Stability of flows associated to gradient vector fields and convergence of iterated transport maps, Manuscripta Math., 121 (2006), pp. 1–50

    2006

  6. [14]

    Ambrosio, F

    L. Ambrosio, F. Renzi, and F. Vitillaro, The superposition principle for local 1-dimensional currents, 2025. Preprint arXiv 2503.18157

    2025 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Ambrosio and D

    L. Ambrosio and D. Trevisan , Well-posedness of Lagrangian flows and continuity equations in metric measure spaces, Anal. PDE, 7 (2014), pp. 1179–1234

    2014

  8. [16]

    Bianchini, P

    S. Bianchini, P. Bonicatto, and N. A. Gusev , Renormalization for autonomous nearly incompressible BV vector fields in two dimensions , SIAM J. Math. Anal., 48 (2016), pp. 1–33

    2016

  9. [17]

    V. I. Bogachev, Measure theory. Vol. I, II , Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2007

    2007

  10. [18]

    Bongini and G

    M. Bongini and G. Buttazzo , Optimal control problems in transport dynamics , Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci., 27 (2017), pp. 427–451

    2017

  11. [19]

    Bonicatto, Untangling of trajectories for non-smooth vector fields and Bressan’s compactness conjecture , PhD thesis, SISSA Trieste, 2017

    P. Bonicatto, Untangling of trajectories for non-smooth vector fields and Bressan’s compactness conjecture , PhD thesis, SISSA Trieste, 2017

    2017

  12. [20]

    Bonicatto, On the transport of currents , Milan J

    P. Bonicatto, On the transport of currents , Milan J. Math., 92 (2024), pp. 371–395

    2024

  13. [21]

    Bonicatto, G

    P. Bonicatto, G. Del Nin, and F. Rindler, Transport of currents and geometric Rademacher-type theorems, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 378 (2025), pp. 4011–4075

    2025

  14. [22]

    Bonicatto and N

    P. Bonicatto and N. A. Gusev , Non-uniqueness of signed measure-valued solutions to the continuity equation in presence of a unique flow , Atti Accad. Naz. Lincei Rend. Lincei Mat. Appl., 30 (2019), pp. 511–531

    2019

  15. [23]

    Bredies, M

    K. Bredies, M. Carioni, and S. Fanzon , A superposition principle for the inhomogeneous continuity equation with Hellinger-Kantorovich-regular coefficients, Comm. Partial Differential Equations, 47 (2022), pp. 2023–2069

    2022

  16. [24]

    Bredies, M

    K. Bredies, M. Carioni, S. Fanzon, and F. Romero , On the extremal points of the ball of the Benamou-Brenier energy, Bull. Lond. Math. Soc., 53 (2021), pp. 1436–1452

    2021

  17. [25]

    , A generalized conditional gradient method for dynamic inverse problems with optimal transport regularization , Found. Comput. Math., 23 (2023), pp. 833–898

    2023

  18. [26]

    Bredies and S

    K. Bredies and S. Fanzon, An optimal transport approach for solving dynamic inverse problems in spaces of measures, ESAIM Math. Model. Numer. Anal., 54 (2020), pp. 2351–2382

    2020

  19. [27]

    Castaing and M

    C. Castaing and M. Valadier, Convex analysis and measurable multifunctions , Lectures Notes in Mathematics, Vol. 580, Springer-Verlag, Berlin-New York, 1977

    1977

  20. [28]

    Cavagnari, S

    G. Cavagnari, S. Lisini, C. Orrieri, and G. Savar´e, Lagrangian, Eulerian and Kantorovich formulations of multi- agent optimal control problems: equivalence and gamma-convergence , J. Differential Equations, 322 (2022), pp. 268– 364

    2022

  21. [29]

    Dal Maso, A

    G. Dal Maso, A. DeSimone, and F. Solombrino , Quasistatic evolution for cam-clay plasticity: a weak formulation via viscoplastic regularization and time rescaling , Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations, 40 (2011), pp. 125–181

    2011

  22. [30]

    Dellacherie and P.-A

    C. Dellacherie and P.-A. Meyer, Probabilities and potential, vol. 29 of North-Holland Mathematics Studies, North- Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam-New York; North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam-New York, 1978. 60 STEFANO ALMI, RICCARDA ROSSI, AND GIUSEPPE SAVAR ´E

    1978

  23. [31]

    Efendiev and A

    M. Efendiev and A. Mielke , On the rate–independent limit of systems with dry friction and small viscosity , J. Convex Analysis, 13 (2006), pp. 151–167

    2006

  24. [32]

    Fornasier, S

    M. Fornasier, S. Lisini, C. Orrieri, and G. Savar ´e, Mean-field optimal control as gamma-limit of finite agent controls, European J. Appl. Math., 30 (2019), pp. 1153–1186

    2019

  25. [33]

    Fornasier and F

    M. Fornasier and F. Solombrino, Mean-field optimal control, ESAIM Control Optim. Calc. Var., 20 (2014), pp. 1123– 1152

    2014

  26. [34]

    Lisini, Characterization of absolutely continuous curves in Wasserstein spaces , Calc

    S. Lisini, Characterization of absolutely continuous curves in Wasserstein spaces , Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equa- tions, 28 (2007), pp. 85–120

    2007

  27. [35]

    , Nonlinear diffusion equations with variable coefficients as gradient flows in Wasserstein spaces, ESAIM Control Optim. Calc. Var., 15 (2009), pp. 712–740

    2009

  28. [36]

    , Absolutely continuous curves in extended Wasserstein-Orlicz spaces , ESAIM Control Optim. Calc. Var., 22 (2016), pp. 670–687

    2016

  29. [37]

    Mielke, R

    A. Mielke, R. Rossi, and G. Savar´e, Modeling solutions with jumps for rate-independent systems on metric spaces , Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst., 25 (2009), pp. 585–615

    2009

  30. [38]

    , BV solutions and viscosity approximations of rate-independent systems , ESAIM: Control, Optimisation and Calculus of Variations, 18 (2012), pp. 36–80

    2012

  31. [39]

    , Balanced viscosity (BV) solutions to infinite-dimensional rate-independent systems, J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS), 18 (2016), pp. 2107–2165

    2016

  32. [40]

    Morandotti and F

    M. Morandotti and F. Solombrino , Mean-field Analysis of Multipopulation Dynamics with Label Switching , SIAM J. Math. Anal., 52 (2020), pp. 1427–1462

    2020

  33. [41]

    J. R. Munkres, Topology, Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2000. Second edition of [MR0464128]

    2000

  34. [42]

    Paolini and E

    E. Paolini and E. Stepanov, Decomposition of acyclic normal currents in a metric space, J. Funct. Anal., 263 (2012), pp. 3358–3390

    2012

  35. [43]

    S. K. Smirnov , Decomposition of solenoidal vector charges into elementary solenoids, and the structure of normal one-dimensional flows, Algebra i Analiz, 5 (1993), pp. 206–238

    1993

  36. [44]

    Stepanov and D

    E. Stepanov and D. Trevisan, Three superposition principles: currents, continuity equations and curves of measures, J. Funct. Anal., 272 (2017), pp. 1044–1103

    2017

  37. [45]

    R. Caccioppoli

    M. Valadier, Young measures, in Methods of nonconvex analysis (Varenna, 1989), A. Cellina, ed., Springer, Berlin, 1990, pp. 152–188. (Stefano Almi) Dipartimento di Matematica ed Applicazioni “R. Caccioppoli”, Universit `a di Napoli Federico II, Via Cintia, Monte S. Angelo, 801...

    1989

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.