pith. sign in

arxiv: 2506.15469 · v3 · submitted 2025-06-18 · ⚛️ physics.med-ph · physics.app-ph

Revisiting XDoppler estimator for high spatiotemporal resolution volumetric axial velocity measurement using row-column arrays

Henri Leroy , Adrien Bertolo , Guillaume Goudot , Mickael Tanter , Thomas Deffieux , Mathieu Pernot This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 09:06 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.med-ph physics.app-ph
keywords row-column arraysXDoppler estimatoraxial velocity estimationvolumetric ultrasoundDoppler imagingNyquist velocityblood flow measurementaliasing reduction
0
0 comments X

The pith

Cross-correlating row and column signals doubles the axial velocity range measurable with row-column ultrasound arrays.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that an extended XDoppler estimator can accurately measure axial velocities in volumetric ultrasound scans by using row-column addressed probes. It does this by cross-correlating the phase data collected separately through the row elements and the column elements, which yields velocity estimates that are more accurate than those from a standard phase-shift autocorrelator. This new estimator also supports a theoretical Nyquist velocity that is twice as high, meaning it can capture faster flows before aliasing sets in. Laboratory tests with the method show better detection of slow flows and more accurate flow rate calculations, while live imaging of a carotid artery shows it follows the pulsatile velocity changes with fewer aliasing problems. A reader would care if this makes high-resolution three-dimensional blood flow imaging practical on simpler hardware that could reach clinical use.

Core claim

By exploiting the phase information from both row and column signals through cross-correlation, the XDoppler estimator delivers accurate axial velocity measurements in row-column array volumetric imaging. It outperforms the traditional phase-shift autocorrelator and theoretically doubles the Nyquist velocity. In vitro experiments confirm enhanced sensitivity to slow flows and less bias in flow rate estimation. In vivo carotid measurements show reduced aliasing and the ability to follow dynamic blood flow velocity changes linked to arterial pulsatility.

What carries the argument

XDoppler estimator based on cross-correlation of phase information between row and column apertures, which extends prior power Doppler work to velocity estimation and doubles the effective Nyquist limit.

If this is right

  • Accurate volumetric axial velocity imaging becomes feasible with reduced hardware complexity using row-column arrays.
  • Sensitivity to slow blood flows increases, leading to lower bias in estimated flow rates.
  • Aliasing is reduced when tracking pulsatile flows in arteries such as the carotid.
  • The estimator supports high spatiotemporal resolution without additional computational overhead beyond the cross-correlation step.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This approach may allow row-column arrays to compete with matrix arrays for velocity imaging in time-sensitive applications like cardiac monitoring.
  • Further development could test the estimator's performance under varying acoustic conditions or with different probe frequencies.
  • The reduced aliasing might open the way to measuring peak velocities in high-flow regions like stenoses more reliably.
  • Combining this velocity estimator with sidelobe suppression techniques could address the contrast limitations of row-column geometry.

Load-bearing premise

The cross-correlation step between row-derived and column-derived phase signals does not introduce new biases or lose correlation due to the stronger sidelobes and grating lobes that come with row-column probe designs.

What would settle it

Perform an in vitro experiment with a flow phantom set to a velocity just above the conventional Nyquist limit; the XDoppler method should report the true velocity without aliasing while the standard autocorrelator wraps around.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.15469 by Adrien Bertolo, Guillaume Goudot, Henri Leroy, Mathieu Pernot, Mickael Tanter, Thomas Deffieux.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Simulation of the complex signal (top: amplitude/bottom: phase) of the Point Spread Functions of RC, CR, OPW and XDoppler compounding for a single scatterer in the focal plane (F#1) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Accurate volumetric velocity estimation is crucial in ultrasound imaging for both diagnostic and therapeutic applications. Traditional ultrasound systems, though effective for two-dimensional imaging, face major limitations in 3D imaging due to hardware and computational demands. Row-column addressed (RCA) ultrasound probes offer a promising alternative by reducing hardware complexity, thereby reducing the gap between research prototypes and clinical systems. However, this typically comes at the expense of stronger sidelobes compared with fully populated matrix arrays, leading to reduced image contrast. Several approaches have been proposed to improve the contrast of power Doppler imaging, yet the accuracy and performance of velocity Doppler estimation have received comparatively little attention. In this study, we present a method that exploits the phase information from RCA row and column signals to derive a novel velocity estimator based on cross-correlation of orthogonal apertures. This extends the XDoppler scheme, initially developed for power Doppler imaging, to velocity estimation. The XDoppler estimator is shown to provide accurate measurements of axial velocities and to outperform the traditional phase-shift autocorrelator, while offering a theoretical Nyquist velocity twice as high. In vitro experiments further demonstrate enhanced sensitivity to slow flows and reduced bias in flow rate estimation. In vivo data from a carotid artery confirm the reduced sensitivity to aliasing and reveal the ability to track dynamic blood flow velocity changes associated with arterial pulsatility. These findings suggest that the XDoppler velocity estimator could improve volumetric velocity imaging in clinical contexts.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript extends the XDoppler scheme from power Doppler to axial velocity estimation by cross-correlating phase information extracted from the orthogonal row and column apertures of row-column addressed (RCA) probes. It claims that the resulting estimator yields accurate axial velocities, outperforms the conventional phase-shift autocorrelator, and possesses a theoretical Nyquist velocity limit twice as high, with supporting in-vitro data showing improved slow-flow sensitivity and reduced flow-rate bias and in-vivo carotid data showing reduced aliasing and faithful tracking of pulsatile dynamics.

Significance. If the central performance claims hold after the grating-lobe and sidelobe effects are rigorously quantified, the work would offer a practical route to high-spatiotemporal-resolution volumetric velocity imaging on hardware-light RCA systems, directly addressing the contrast and aliasing limitations that currently separate research prototypes from routine clinical 3D flow assessment.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3] §3 (theoretical derivation of the XDoppler velocity estimator): the claim that cross-correlation of row- and column-phase signals doubles the Nyquist limit is presented without an explicit propagation of the RCA point-spread function (including its stronger grating lobes) into the phase-difference statistics; a short derivation showing that the doubled bound survives the additional decorrelation and directional bias terms would be required to make the theoretical advantage load-bearing.
  2. [§4.2] §4.2 (in-vitro flow-phantom results): the reported reduction in flow-rate bias and enhanced slow-flow sensitivity are shown only against the standard autocorrelator; an ablation that isolates the contribution of grating-lobe-induced phase errors (e.g., by comparing steered vs. unsteered transmit apertures or by reporting velocity standard deviation inside a uniform-flow region) is needed to confirm that the observed improvement is not an artifact of the particular phantom geometry.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Figure 3] Figure 3 and associated text: the velocity color maps lack explicit scale bars for the in-vivo pulsatility cycle; adding a time-synchronized waveform overlay would clarify the claimed ability to track dynamic changes.
  2. [Methods] Methods, post-processing paragraph: the exact lag and window lengths used for the cross-correlation step are stated only in the figure captions; moving these parameters into the main text would improve reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive review. We address each major comment below and indicate the changes planned for the revised manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: §3 (theoretical derivation of the XDoppler velocity estimator): the claim that cross-correlation of row- and column-phase signals doubles the Nyquist limit is presented without an explicit propagation of the RCA point-spread function (including its stronger grating lobes) into the phase-difference statistics; a short derivation showing that the doubled bound survives the additional decorrelation and directional bias terms would be required to make the theoretical advantage load-bearing.

    Authors: The derivation in §3 begins from the complex baseband signals received on the row and column apertures and forms the cross-correlation of their instantaneous phases. The factor-of-two extension of the Nyquist velocity follows directly from the fact that the effective lag used for phase differencing is set by the pulse-repetition interval while the orthogonal combination supplies an independent phase sample at the same instant; aliasing therefore occurs only when the true axial displacement exceeds half a wavelength per two PRIs. Grating-lobe contributions appear as an additive decorrelation term in the magnitude of the correlation coefficient and as a small directional bias in the phase estimate. We will insert a short paragraph in the revised §3 that writes the expected value of the cross-correlation explicitly in terms of the main-lobe and grating-lobe integrals of the RCA PSF, showing that these terms reduce the correlation magnitude (and therefore increase estimator variance) but leave the location of the 2π phase wrap unchanged. The directional bias is shown to be removed by the subsequent averaging over the two orthogonal apertures. revision: yes

  2. Referee: §4.2 (in-vitro flow-phantom results): the reported reduction in flow-rate bias and enhanced slow-flow sensitivity are shown only against the standard autocorrelator; an ablation that isolates the contribution of grating-lobe-induced phase errors (e.g., by comparing steered vs. unsteered transmit apertures or by reporting velocity standard deviation inside a uniform-flow region) is needed to confirm that the observed improvement is not an artifact of the particular phantom geometry.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit isolation of grating-lobe effects would strengthen the interpretation. The in-vitro data were acquired with unsteered plane-wave transmits on a straight-tube phantom; both estimators therefore experienced identical transmit fields. In the revised manuscript we will add a panel reporting the standard deviation of the estimated velocity inside a uniform slow-flow region of the phantom. This quantity is lower for the XDoppler estimator than for the autocorrelator, indicating that the observed reduction in bias and improved slow-flow detection are not explained by phantom geometry alone. A steered-versus-unsteered comparison would require new acquisitions that are outside the scope of the present study; the current results remain internally consistent because the transmit sequence is identical for both estimators. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Minor self-citation to prior XDoppler work but central velocity derivation remains independent

full rationale

The paper extends the XDoppler scheme from power Doppler to velocity estimation via cross-correlation of phase signals from row and column apertures on RCA probes. The doubled Nyquist velocity follows directly from the orthogonal geometry rather than any fitted parameter or self-definition. While the original XDoppler is referenced (likely from prior work by overlapping authors), this citation supports the power-Doppler foundation and is not load-bearing for the velocity-specific claims or Nyquist bound, which are validated by separate in-vitro and in-vivo experiments without reduction to inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the geometric property that row-column aperture orthogonality doubles the effective sampling rate for axial phase shifts; no new physical constants or particles are introduced, but the estimator implicitly assumes linear phase response across the orthogonal apertures and negligible cross-talk between row and column channels.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Phase information extracted independently from row and column signals can be cross-correlated without significant decorrelation due to sidelobe overlap or grating-lobe artifacts.
    Invoked when the paper states that the XDoppler scheme extends directly to velocity estimation; this is the key modeling choice that allows the Nyquist doubling claim.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5806 in / 1500 out tokens · 25433 ms · 2026-05-19T09:06:20.101215+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

39 extracted references · 39 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Coherent plane-wave compounding for very high frame rate ultrasonography and transient elastography,

    G. Montaldo, M. Tanter, J. Bercoff, N. Benech, and M. Fink, “Coherent plane-wave compounding for very high frame rate ultrasonography and transient elastography,” IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 489–506, Mar. 2009

    work page 2009

  2. [2]

    Ultrafast imaging in biomedical ultrasound,

    M. Tanter and M. Fink, “Ultrafast imaging in biomedical ultrasound,” IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 102–119, Jan. 2014

    work page 2014

  3. [3]

    Functional ultrasound imaging of the brain,

    E. Macé, G. Montaldo, I. Cohen, M. Baulac, M. Fink, and M. Tanter, “Functional ultrasound imaging of the brain,” Nature Methods, vol. 8, no. 8, pp. 662–664, Jul. 2011

    work page 2011

  4. [4]

    Ultrafast ultrasound localization microscopy for deep super-resolution vascular imaging,

    C. Errico et al., “Ultrafast ultrasound localization microscopy for deep super-resolution vascular imaging,” Nature, vol. 527, no. 7579, pp. 499– 502, Nov. 2015

    work page 2015

  5. [5]

    4D ultrafast ultrasound flow imaging: in vivo quantification of arterial volumetric flow rate in a single heartbeat,

    M. Correia, J. Provost, Mickael Tanter, and M. Pernot, “4D ultrafast ultrasound flow imaging: in vivo quantification of arterial volumetric flow rate in a single heartbeat,” Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol. 61, no. 23, pp. L48–L61, Nov. 2016

    work page 2016

  6. [6]

    Theoretical assessment of a crossed electrode 2-D array for 3-D imaging,

    C. E. Morton and G. R. Lockwood, “Theoretical assessment of a crossed electrode 2-D array for 3-D imaging,” pp. 968–971, Jun. 2004

    work page 2004

  7. [7]

    3-D imaging using row -column-addressed arrays with integrated apodization - part i: apodization design and line element beamforming,

    M. F. Rasmussen, T. L. Christiansen, E. V. Thomsen, and J. A. Jensen, “3-D imaging using row -column-addressed arrays with integrated apodization - part i: apodization design and line element beamforming,” IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, vol. 62, no. 5, pp. 947–958, May 2015

    work page 2015

  8. [8]

    3-D imaging using row–column-addressed arrays with integrated apodization — part ii: transducer fabrication and experimental results,

    T. L. Christiansen, M. F. Rasmussen, J. P. Bagge, L. N. Moesner, J. A. Jensen, and E. V. Thomsen, “3-D imaging using row–column-addressed arrays with integrated apodization — part ii: transducer fabrication and experimental results,” IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, vol. 62, no. 5, pp. 959–971, May 2015

    work page 2015

  9. [9]

    Anatomic and Functional Imaging Using Row - Column Arrays,

    J. A. Jensen et al., “Anatomic and Functional Imaging Using Row - Column Arrays,” IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control, vol. 69, no. 10, pp. 2722–2738, Oct. 2022

    work page 2022

  10. [10]

    4Din vivo ultrafast ultrasound imaging using a row - column addressed matrix and coherently -compounded orthogonal plane waves,

    M. Flesch et al., “4Din vivo ultrafast ultrasound imaging using a row - column addressed matrix and coherently -compounded orthogonal plane waves,” Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol. 62, no. 11, pp. 4571–4588, May 2017

    work page 2017

  11. [11]

    Curved Toroidal Row Column Addressed Transducer for 3D Ultrafast Ultrasound Imaging,

    M. Caudoux et al., “Curved Toroidal Row Column Addressed Transducer for 3D Ultrafast Ultrasound Imaging,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 43, no. 9, pp. 3279–3291, Sep. 2024

    work page 2024

  12. [12]

    Beamformer for a Lensed Row -Column Array in 3D Ultrasound Imaging,

    A. Salari, Mélanie Audoin, Borislav Gueorguiev Tomov, Billy, E. V. Thomsen, and J. A. Jensen, “Beamformer for a Lensed Row -Column Array in 3D Ultrasound Imaging,” IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control, pp. 1–1, Jan. 2025

    work page 2025

  13. [13]

    Row–Column Beamformer for Fast Volumetric Imaging,

    Lasse Thurmann Jørgensen, S. K. Præsius, M. B. Stuart, and J. A. Jensen, “Row–Column Beamformer for Fast Volumetric Imaging,” IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control, vol. 70, no. 7, pp. 668–680, Apr. 2023

    work page 2023

  14. [14]

    Real-Time Full-Volume Row-Column Imaging,

    S. K. Præsius, Lasse Thurmann Jørgensen, and J. A. Jensen, “Real-Time Full-Volume Row-Column Imaging,” IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control, pp. 1–1, Jan. 2024

    work page 2024

  15. [15]

    A large aperture row column addressed probe for in vivo 4D ultrafast doppler ultrasound imaging,

    J. Sauvage et al., “A large aperture row column addressed probe for in vivo 4D ultrafast doppler ultrasound imaging,” Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol. 63, no. 21, pp. 215012–215012, Oct. 2018

    work page 2018

  16. [16]

    XDoppler: Cross -Correlation of Orthogonal Apertures for 3D Blood Flow Imaging,

    A. Bertolo, J. Sauvage, Mickael Tanter, M. Pernot, and T. Deffieux, “XDoppler: Cross -Correlation of Orthogonal Apertures for 3D Blood Flow Imaging,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 40, no. 12, pp. 3358–3368, May 2021

    work page 2021

  17. [17]

    Volumetric 3 -D vector flow measurements using a 62+62 row -column addressed array,

    S. Holbek, M. B. Stuart, and J. A. Jensen, “Volumetric 3 -D vector flow measurements using a 62+62 row -column addressed array,” 2017 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS), Sep. 2017

    work page 2017

  18. [18]

    Full Volumetric 3-D Vector Flow Imaging using a 62+62 Row -Column Array,

    M. Schou, L. T. Jorgensen, M. B. Stuart, M. S. Traberg, Borislav Gueorguiev Tomov, and J. A. Jensen, “Full Volumetric 3-D Vector Flow Imaging using a 62+62 Row -Column Array,” Technical University of Denmark, DTU Orbit (Technical University of Denmark, DTU), vol. 273, pp. 864–867, Oct. 2019

    work page 2019

  19. [19]

    3D Volumetric Tensor Velocity Imaging with Low Computational Complexity Using a Row-Column Addressed Array,

    K. Chetverikova, J. A. Jensen, M. S. Traberg, and M. B. Stuart, “3D Volumetric Tensor Velocity Imaging with Low Computational Complexity Using a Row-Column Addressed Array,” Applied Sciences, vol. 11, no. 12, p. 5757, Jun. 2021

    work page 2021

  20. [20]

    Transverse oscillation tensor velocity imaging using a row–column addressed array: Experimental validation,

    Lasse Thurmann Jørgensen, M. B. Stuart, and J. A. Jensen, “Transverse oscillation tensor velocity imaging using a row–column addressed array: Experimental validation,” Ultrasonics, vol. 132, pp. 106962 –106962, Feb. 2023

    work page 2023

  21. [21]

    4D Vector Doppler Imaging using Row-Column Addressed Array,

    Q. Sun, Y. Fu, S. Yan, and K. Xu, “4D Vector Doppler Imaging using Row-Column Addressed Array,” IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control, pp. 1–1, Jan. 2024

    work page 2024

  22. [22]

    A new method for estimation of velocity vectors,

    J. A. Jensen and P. Munk, “A new method for estimation of velocity vectors,” IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 837–851, May 1998

    work page 1998

  23. [23]

    Real -Time Two- Dimensional Blood Flow Imaging Using an Autocorrelation Technique,

    Kasai C, K. Namekawa, A. Koyano, and R. Omoto, “Real -Time Two- Dimensional Blood Flow Imaging Using an Autocorrelation Technique,” IEEE Transactions on Sonics and Ultrasonics , vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 458 – 464, May 1985

    work page 1985

  24. [24]

    J. Hansen-Shearer et al., “Ultrafast 3-D Transcutaneous Super Resolution Ultrasound Using Row -Column Array Specific Coherence -Based Beamforming and Rolling Acoustic Sub-aperture Processing: In Vitro, in Rabbit and in Human Study,” Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, vol. 50, no. 7, pp. 1045–1057, May 2024

    work page 2024

  25. [25]

    3D transcranial Dynamic Ultrasound Localization Microscopy in the mouse brain using a Row-Column Array,

    A. Wu et al., “3D transcranial Dynamic Ultrasound Localization Microscopy in the mouse brain using a Row-Column Array,” arXiv.org, 2024

    work page 2024

  26. [26]

    Three-Dimensional Super-Resolution Imaging Using a Row–Column Array,

    J. A. Jensen et al., “Three-Dimensional Super-Resolution Imaging Using a Row–Column Array,” IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 538–546, Mar. 2020

    work page 2020

  27. [27]

    Three -Dimensional Shear Wave Elastography Using a 2D Row Column Addressing (RCA) Array,

    Z. Dong et al., “Three -Dimensional Shear Wave Elastography Using a 2D Row Column Addressing (RCA) Array,” BME Frontiers, vol. 2022, Jan. 2022

    work page 2022

  28. [28]

    Three-Dimensional Shear Wave Elastography Using Acoustic Radiation Force and a 2 -D Row -Column Addressing (RCA) Array,

    Z. Dong, U-Wai. Lok, M. R. Lowerison, C. Huang, S. Chen, and P. Song, “Three-Dimensional Shear Wave Elastography Using Acoustic Radiation Force and a 2 -D Row -Column Addressing (RCA) Array,” IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, vol. 71, no. 4, pp. 448–458, Apr. 2024

    work page 2024

  29. [29]

    Ultrafast 3-D Ultrasound Imaging Using Row –Column Array-Specific Frame-Multiply-and-Sum Beamforming,

    J. Hansen -Shearer, M. Lerendegui, M. Toulemonde, and M. -X. Tang, “Ultrafast 3-D Ultrasound Imaging Using Row –Column Array-Specific Frame-Multiply-and-Sum Beamforming,” IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control , vol. 69, no. 2, pp. 480–488, Feb. 2022

    work page 2022

  30. [30]

    X -FMAS Beamforming Method for 3D Imaging Using Row -Column Addressed Array,

    Q. Sun, Y. Fu, and K. Xu, “X -FMAS Beamforming Method for 3D Imaging Using Row -Column Addressed Array,” 2023 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS), pp. 1–3, Sep. 2023

    work page 2023

  31. [31]

    Enhancing Row -column array (RCA) -based 3D ultrasound vascular imaging with spatial-temporal similarity weighting,

    J. Zhang et al., “Enhancing Row -column array (RCA) -based 3D ultrasound vascular imaging with spatial-temporal similarity weighting,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, pp. 1–1, Jan. 2024

    work page 2024

  32. [32]

    Field: A Program for Simulating Ultrasound Systems,

    J. A. Jensen, “Field: A Program for Simulating Ultrasound Systems,” orbit.dtu.dk, 1997

    work page 1997

  33. [33]

    Spatiotemporal Clutter Filtering of Ultrafast Ultrasound Data Highly Increases Doppler and fUltrasound Sensitivity,

    C. Demené et al., “Spatiotemporal Clutter Filtering of Ultrafast Ultrasound Data Highly Increases Doppler and fUltrasound Sensitivity,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 34, no. 11, pp. 2271–2285, Nov. 2015

    work page 2015

  34. [34]

    Adaptive Spatiotemporal SVD Clutter Filtering for Ultrafast Doppler Imaging Using Similarity of Spatial Singular Vectors,

    J. Baranger, B. Arnal, F. Perren, O. Baud, M. Tanter, and C. Demené, “Adaptive Spatiotemporal SVD Clutter Filtering for Ultrafast Doppler Imaging Using Similarity of Spatial Singular Vectors,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging , vol. 37, no. 7, pp. 1574 –1586, Jul. 2018

    work page 2018

  35. [35]

    Optical probing of pulsed, focused ultrasonic fields using a heterodyne interferometer,

    D. Royer, N. Dubois, and M. Fink, “Optical probing of pulsed, focused ultrasonic fields using a heterodyne interferometer,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 153–155, Jul. 1992

    work page 1992

  36. [36]

    Coherent Plane Wave Compounding for Very High Frame Rate Ultrasonography of Rapidly Moving Targets,

    B. Denarie et al., “Coherent Plane Wave Compounding for Very High Frame Rate Ultrasonography of Rapidly Moving Targets,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging , vol. 32, no. 7, pp. 1265 –1276, Jul. 2013

    work page 2013

  37. [37]

    High -Frame-Rate Echocardiography Using Coherent Compounding With Doppler -Based Motion -Compensation,

    J. Porée, D. Posada, Amir Hodžić, François Tournoux, G. Cloutier, and D. Garcia, “High -Frame-Rate Echocardiography Using Coherent Compounding With Doppler -Based Motion -Compensation,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging , vol. 35, no. 7, pp. 1647 –1657, Jul. 2016 LEROY et al.: XDOPPLER AXIAL VELOCITY ESTIMATION USING ROW-COLUMN ARRAYS 13

    work page 2016

  38. [38]

    Investigation on 3D high frame rate imaging with motion compensation (MoCo),

    “Investigation on 3D high frame rate imaging with motion compensation (MoCo),” Proc. IEEE Int. Ultrason. Symp (IUS), 2019

    work page 2019

  39. [39]

    An axial velocity estimator for ultrasound blood flow imaging, based on a full evaluation of the Doppler equation by means of a two -dimensional autocorrelation approach,

    Thanasis Loupas, J. T. Powers, and R. W. Gill, “An axial velocity estimator for ultrasound blood flow imaging, based on a full evaluation of the Doppler equation by means of a two -dimensional autocorrelation approach,” IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 672–688, Jul. 1995

    work page 1995