Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 7 minor 70 references

Characterization of discharge capillaries via benchmarked hydrodynamic plasma simulations

T0 review · 3 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A hydrodynamic plasma simulation benchmarked against capillary discharge experiments reproduces H-alpha linewidth evolution and quantifies energy deposition and OES diagnostic biases.

desk verdict A useful extension and benchmark of a capillary discharge simulation, with a central validation claim that is a bit stronger than the evidence. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.16192 v1 pith:CP2DGIJV submitted 2025-06-19 physics.plasm-ph

S. M. Mewes , G. J. Boyle , R. D'Arcy , J. M. Garland , M. Huck , H. Jones , G. Loisch , A. R. Maier
show 5 more authors
J. Osterhoff T. Parikh S. Wesch J. C. Wood M. Thévenet
This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.plasm-ph
keywords plasmadischargecapillariessimulationsacceleratoracceleratorshydrodynamicmbar
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Discharge capillaries are narrow tubes filled with hydrogen gas that are used in plasma accelerators to guide or focus particle beams. When a high-voltage pulse breaks down the gas, it creates a hot plasma that can support strong electric fields. Simulating these devices is hard because it involves electrical currents, plasma chemistry, and heat transfer to the walls, and because the plasma is difficult to probe experimentally.

This paper takes an existing simulation framework, HYQUP, and adds the missing physics: an electric current driven by the measured discharge pulse, interactions of the plasma with the capillary wall, and a more complete set of hydrogen reactions including dissociation and ionization. The authors then check the simulation against experiments on a 50-mm-long capillary at hydrogen pressures from 2 to 12 mbar and voltages from 12 to 27 kV. They compare the width of the H-alpha light emission line, which depends on the electron density, and find that the simulated linewidth evolution matches the measured one reasonably well, especially near the peak of the discharge and during the decay.

The simulation is then used to look inside the plasma in ways experiments cannot. It shows that the standard H-alpha measurement averages over a strongly inhomogeneous plasma and can overestimate or underestimate the on-axis density by up to 50%. It also estimates that each discharge deposits about 178 mJ of energy into the plasma, mostly as heat to the capillary wall, which matters for high-repetition-rate operation. The result is a tool that can be used to design better plasma sources and to interpret spectroscopic measurements more carefully.

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the extended HYQUP model is validated by experiment: "Both the trends with the scan parameters, as well as the absolute values, are in good agreement for the full range of gas pressures and voltages, indicating a broad reliability range of the plasma simulation model" (Sec. III.3). If true, the model reliably reproduces H-alpha linewidth dynamics and provides trustworthy characterizations of discharge capillary plasmas, including energy deposition and density profiles.

Load-bearing premise

The benchmark's validity rests on the accuracy of the H-alpha Stark broadening model (Appendix B, Eqs. B6-B11) used both to infer experimental densities via Eq. (10) and to synthesize simulated spectra. If this model is biased, agreement between simulation and experiment in linewidth would not confirm the plasma state predictions, making the validation and the derived OES limitation conclusions unreliable.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 7 minor

Summary. This manuscript extends the HYQUP hydrodynamic plasma model to discharge capillaries by adding electric current flow, magnetic-field corrections, a revised hydrogen reaction set, and wall/sheath boundary conditions. It constructs a start-to-end simulation pipeline in which the measured current pulse drives the discharge and an emission model synthesizes H-alpha line profiles, then benchmarks the simulated linewidth metrics (peak HWHM and decay rate) against optical emission spectroscopy measurements over 2-12 mbar and 12-27 kV. The authors report good agreement over this parameter range, use the model to characterize energy deposition (178 mJ for a 20 kV, 8.7 mbar discharge), discuss limitations of transverse H-alpha OES for reconstructing on-axis density, and propose a sheath boundary condition. The central claim is that the model has a broad reliability range for investigating discharge capillaries relevant to plasma accelerators.

Significance. If the central claim holds, this work fills a genuine gap: systematic multi-species hydrodynamic simulations of discharge capillaries with an explicit benchmark against experiment and a documented start-to-end pipeline. Strengths include the use of the measured current pulse as a boundary condition rather than a free fit, the two-dimensional treatment that captures axial expulsion, the comparison over a parameter matrix rather than a single operating point, and a detailed energy budget. The paper also makes a practically important point that transverse H-alpha OES is emission-weighted and line-integrated, so it gives only indirect information about the on-axis density profile. These features make the manuscript a useful contribution to the discharge-capillary simulation literature, provided the validation claim is brought in line with the evidence.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. III.3, Fig. 5] The validation claim in Sec. III.3 ('Both the trends with the scan parameters, as well as the absolute values, are in good agreement...') is the load-bearing statement of the paper, but Fig. 5 presents no uncertainty bars, no shot-to-shot scatter, and no quantitative agreement metric. The single excluded outlier in Fig. 5(c) is dismissed as 'likely... a malfunction' without supporting evidence or a pre-defined exclusion criterion. Because the benchmark covers many operating points, a normalized residual (e.g., (sim-exp)/sigma_exp and (sim-exp)/sigma_sim) or a tolerance band would turn the qualitative claim into a testable one; without it, the 'broad reliability range' cannot be evaluated by the reader.
  2. [Appendix B, Eqs. (B1)-(B5), Fig. 4(a)] The linewidth used for benchmarking is a chord-integrated observable weighted by the excited-state population I_alpha, whose Boltzmann/Saha blend and mixing function zeta are not independently validated. As the text states, at 0.5 micro-s the emission originates almost exclusively near the wall, so the benchmark primarily constrains the near-wall plasma, not the axis density that matters for accelerators. Fig. 7(a) shows that an OES reconstruction from the same model differs by up to 50% from the center density, so agreement in linewidth could in principle be produced by a wrong radial density profile compensated by a wrong emission weighting. In addition, the experimental density inference (Eq. 10) and the synthetic Stark width (Eq. B6) both rely on H-alpha Stark-broadening calibrations, so a common bias in those calibrations would not show up in the benchmark. Please validate the emission model or the simulated density profile against an independent diagnostic (e.g., the interferometry approach of Ref. [61]), or restrict the validated claims to the quantities directly constrained by OES.
  3. [Sec. III.2, Eq. (11)] The model is initialized with 0.1% ionization and 1% atomic fraction, chosen because 'a modest ionization fraction is required for the discharge to further ionize the medium,' and the gas-flow-to-pressure relation (Eq. 11) is also a calibrated input. The text asserts that near the current peak 'the results become independent of the initial conditions,' but no sensitivity scan is shown. Since these are free parameters and the breakdown phase is not modeled, please include a short scan over initial ionization and atomic fractions (and, if feasible, the pressure-calibration coefficients) to demonstrate the claimed insensitivity and to quantify the time at which the memory of the initial state is lost.
minor comments (7)
  1. [Fig. 5 caption and Sec. III.3] The sentence 'In (a) and (c) a parameter scan over gas pressure and in (c) and (d) a voltage scan are shown' is internally inconsistent, because panel (c) cannot be both a pressure scan and a voltage scan; please correct the panel assignments.
  2. [Sec. II.4] The phrase 'quasi-neutrality is breaks down' should read 'quasi-neutrality breaks down.'
  3. [Sec. III.2] The sentence 'the current pulses measured in the experiment are processed and put into respective initial conditions and boundary conditions of the plasma simulation' is unclear, because the current pulse is used as a boundary condition in Eq. (1), not as an initial condition.
  4. [Sec. IV] In the paragraph beginning 'The average gas density n_a shows...', the subject is doubled and the notation n_a is not introduced before this point; please rephrase (e.g., 'The average neutral density n_a exhibits...').
  5. [Sec. V] The scaling estimate for megahertz operation appears numerically off: 140 mJ/shot over a 5 cm plasma at 1 MHz gives 28 kW/cm (or 15 kW/cm if the reduced 74 mJ/shot estimate is used), not 'on the order of 10 kW per centimeter.' Please check the arithmetic.
  6. [Abstract and Sec. I] The phrase 'operating a 12-27 kV discharge at 2-12 mbar hydrogen pressure' would read more clearly as 'operating at 12-27 kV and 2-12 mbar'; the ranges would also benefit from en-dashes.
  7. [Fig. 4(b) and Sec. III.3] The quantity delta_decay = 0.76 ps^-1 is introduced in the figure caption, but the exponential fit expression is not given in the text; please state the definition of delta_decay near its first use in Sec. III.3.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the benchmark compares simulated and measured H-alpha linewidths directly, with the measured current pulse as an input boundary condition and no fitted parameters; the shared Stark-broadening model is an external diagnostic relation, not a by-construction identity.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is a benchmark of the HYQUP model against experimental H-alpha linewidth scans (Sec. III.3). The measured current pulse is fed into the simulation as a boundary condition: 'The pulse is used as a constraint in the plasma simulation, fixing the total current flowing through the electrode surfaces in Eq. (1).' This is an input, not a parameter fitted to the benchmark targets. The comparison is made on linewidth metrics (peak width and decay rate) extracted from the time scan, not on densities reconstructed through Eq. (10), so the simulation is not recovering the same fitted quantity used to set its inputs. The H-alpha broadening model is shared between experimental analysis and the synthetic spectra, but it is taken from external sources (Gigosos et al., Pardini et al., Mitchner and Kruger) and is not adjusted to force agreement. The paper also shows insensitivity of the peak/decay metrics to estimated initial conditions: 'upon reaching a steady state near the peak of a strong discharge, the results become independent of the initial conditions.' The radial emission-weighting caveat (emission near the wall at 0.5 us) is a physical-scope limitation and a possible source of bias, not a circular step, because the simulation output is not defined in terms of the measured linewidth. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no load-bearing argument reduces to a self-citation: the HYQUP model is cited from prior work, but its reliability in this paper is established by the external experimental comparison. Therefore no circular step satisfying the evidence standard is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The simulation rests on several domain assumptions (quasi-neutrality, cylindrical symmetry, optically thin plasma, measured current as input) and a few hand-chosen parameters (initial ionization/atomic fractions, emission model width and cutoff). No new physical entities are introduced. These assumptions are mostly standard for the regime, but the emission model parameters are not independently benchmarked.

free parameters (5)
  • Initial ionization fraction = 0.1%
    Assumed to initiate breakdown in the simulation, not measured; text states a modest ionization fraction is required for discharge to further ionize the medium (Sec. III.2).
  • Initial neutral atomic fraction = 1%
    Assumed as part of the initial mixture (98.9% molecular), not measured (Sec. III.2).
  • Gas flow-pressure relation coefficients = p[Pa] = 73.79 * (flow[mL_n/min])^0.57
    Power-law fit to ANSYS gas flow simulations; used to set initial homogeneous gas density (Eq. 11).
  • Emission model mixing width = Δε = ε4/2
    Chosen smoothing width in the Saha/Boltzmann mixing function ζ, defined as one state above/below the 3rd (Eq. B2).
  • Partition function cutoff = states up to 10
    Truncation of the canonical partition function to bound states below the 10th (Eq. B5), chosen to avoid divergence.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Plasma is quasi-neutral and describable by single-fluid, two-temperature hydrodynamics
    Core premise of the HYQUP model, stated in Sec. II; assumed appropriate for the discharge regime where dynamics are governed by pressure/temperature rather than magnetic field.
  • domain assumption Plasma is optically thin and radiative losses are negligible
    Stated in Sec. II.3: radiative ionization neglected, radiative recombination negligible, radiative losses omitted in energy balance.
  • domain assumption Cylindrical symmetry and longitudinal mirror symmetry of the capillary
    Simulations performed in cylindrically symmetric, longitudinally mirrored coordinates (Sec. III.2); 2D simulation assumes no azimuthal variation.
  • domain assumption The measured current pulse fully determines the discharge dynamics, and initial breakdown can be approximated by small seed ionization
    Current pulse is imposed as a boundary condition (Eq. 1); initial kinetic breakdown is not simulated, and the authors rely on steady-state independence from initial conditions (Sec. III.2).
  • domain assumption The sheath can be represented by a simplified analytical boundary condition at the wall
    Pekker et al. sheath model with modifications (Sec. II.4); assumes sheath is thinner than capillary radius and nearly collisionless.
  • ad hoc to paper The smooth mixing function ζ between Boltzmann and Saha equilibrium populations of the n=3 state is valid
    Introduced in Appendix B (Eq. B2) with a chosen width Δε; no independent validation is provided.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Characterization of discharge capillaries via benchmarked hydrodynamic plasma simulations." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/CP2DGIJV

@misc{pith2026250616192,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Characterization of discharge capillaries via benchmarked hydrodynamic plasma simulations},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/CP2DGIJV}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.16192}
}
read the original abstract

Plasma accelerators utilize strong electric fields in plasma waves to accelerate charged particles, making them a compact alternative to radiofrequency technologies. Discharge capillaries are plasma sources used in plasma accelerator research to provide acceleration targets, or as plasma lenses to capture or focus accelerated beams. They have applications for beam-driven and laser-driven plasma accelerators and can sustain high repetition rates for extended periods of time. Despite these advantages, high-fidelity simulations of discharge capillaries remain challenging due to the range of mechanisms involved and the difficulty to diagnose them in experiments. In this work, we utilize hydrodynamic plasma simulations to examine the discharge process of a plasma cell and discuss implications for future accelerator systems. The simulation model is validated with experimental measurements in a 50-mm-long, 1-mm-wide plasma capillary operating a 12-27 kV discharge at 2-12mbar hydrogen pressure. For 20 kV at 8.7mbar the discharge is shown to deposit 178mJ of energy in the plasma. Potential difficulties with the common density measurement method using H{\alpha} emission spectroscopy are discussed. This simulation model enables investigations of repeatability, heat flow management and fine tailoring of the plasma profile with discharges.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.16192 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Schematic of the discharge capillary. The inset sim [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Schematic of the experimental setup: The capillary [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Schematic of the simulation pipeline used for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Benchmark summary over broad working parameter [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Longitudinally resolved evolution of line width for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Time evolution of important quantities in the exam [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Radial distribution of plasma properties for different [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Spectral line example demonstrating the combination [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_9.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

70 extracted references · 63 canonical work pages

  1. [61]

    Griem,Spectral Line Broadening by Plasmas(Aca- demic Press, New York, 1974)

    H. Griem,Spectral Line Broadening by Plasmas(Aca- demic Press, New York, 1974)

    work page 1974

  2. [1]

    The intensity of the emitted light is therefore propor- tional to the population of the 3rd excited state

    Emission Intensity The H α-emissions originate from the decay of the 3rd excited state to the 2nd excited state of a hydrogen atom. The intensity of the emitted light is therefore propor- tional to the population of the 3rd excited state. This population is used as a relative intensity weightI α when calculating the combined spectrum of a plasma volume. T...

    work page

  3. [2]

    Line Broadening There are several physical effects leading to broaden- ing of spectral lines. Those considered in the model are Stark broadening by the electric fields of the free plasma electrons, thermal Doppler broadening and a constant instrument broadening of the optics setup. The local spectral line is modeled as a Voigt function, i.e. a con- voluti...

    work page

  4. [3]

    Two single point emission lines at the peak of the discharge (t = 500 ns) are calculated from the example simulation and shown in Fig

    Combined spectrum The local emission line profileI loc.(λ, ⃗ x) is constructed as a pseudo-Voigt function on a 10 nm broad spectral grid with a 100 pm resolution, whereλis the wavelength relative to the unperturbed emission. Two single point emission lines at the peak of the discharge (t = 500 ns) are calculated from the example simulation and shown in Fi...

    work page

  5. [4]

    Tajima and J

    T. Tajima and J. M. Dawson, Laser electron accelerator, Phys. Rev. Lett.43, 267 (1979)

    1979

  6. [5]

    P. Chen, J. M. Dawson, R. W. Huff, and T. Katsouleas, Acceleration of electrons by the interaction of a bunched electron beam with a plasma, Phys. Rev. Lett.54, 693 (1985)

    1985

  7. [6]

    Blumenfeld, C

    I. Blumenfeld, C. E. Clayton, F.-J. Decker, M. J. Hogan, C. Huang, R. Ischebeck, R. Iverson, C. Joshi, T. Kat- souleas, N. Kirby, W. Lu, K. A. Marsh, W. B. Mori, P. Muggli, E. Oz, R. H. Siemann, D. Walz, and M. Zhou, Energy doubling of 42 gev electrons in a metre-scale plasma wakefield accelerator, Nature445, 741 (2007)

    work page 2007

  8. [7]

    Corde, K

    S. Corde, K. Ta Phuoc, G. Lambert, R. Fitour, V. Malka, A. Rousse, A. Beck, and E. Lefebvre, Femtosecond x rays from laser-plasma accelerators, Rev. Mod. Phys.85, 1 (2013)

    work page 2013

Show all 70 references
  1. [8]

    Vranic, J

    M. Vranic, J. L. Martins, J. Vieira, R. A. Fon- seca, and L. O. Silva, All-optical radiation reaction at 1021 W/cm2, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 134801 (2014)

    2014

  2. [9]

    W. Wang, K. Feng, L. Ke, C. Yu, Y. Xu, R. Qi, Y. Chen, Z. Qin, Z. Zhang, M. Fang,et al., Free-electron lasing at 27 nanometres based on a laser wakefield accelerator, Nature595, 516 (2021)

    2021

  3. [10]

    Pompili, D

    R. Pompili, D. Alesini, M. Anania, S. Arjmand, M. Be- htouei, M. Bellaveglia, A. Biagioni, B. Buonomo, F. Cardelli, M. Carpanese,et al., Free-electron lasing with compact beam-driven plasma wakefield accelerator, Nature605, 659 (2022)

    2022

  4. [11]

    C. B. Schroeder, E. Esarey, C. G. R. Geddes, C. Benedetti, and W. P. Leemans, Physics considerations for laser-plasma linear colliders, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams13, 101301 (2010)

    2010

  5. [12]

    Foster, R

    B. Foster, R. D’Arcy, and C. A. Lindstrøm, A hy- brid, asymmetric, linear higgs factory based on plasma- wakefield and radio-frequency acceleration, New Journal of Physics25, 093037 (2023)

    2023

  6. [13]

    A. R. Maier, N. M. Delbos, T. Eichner, L. H¨ ubner, S. Jalas, L. Jeppe, S. W. Jolly, M. Kirchen, V. Leroux, P. Messner,et al., Decoding sources of energy variabil- ity in a laser-plasma accelerator, Physical Review X10, 11 031039 (2020)

    2020

  7. [14]

    C. A. Lindstrøm, S. Corde, R. D’Arcy, S. Gess- ner, M. Gilljohann, M. J. Hogan, and J. Oster- hoff, Beam-driven plasma-wakefield acceleration (2025), arXiv:2504.05558 [physics.acc-ph]

    2025 arXiv

  8. [15]

    A. J. Gonsalves, F. Liu, N. A. Bobrova, P. V. Sasorov, C. Pieronek, J. Daniels, S. Antipov, J. E. Butler, S. S. Bulanov, W. L. Waldron, D. E. Mittelberger, and W. P. Leemans, Demonstration of a high repetition rate cap- illary discharge waveguide, J. Appl. Phys.119, 033302 (2016)

    2016

  9. [16]

    Lindstrøm, J

    C. Lindstrøm, J. Beinortait˙ e, J. Bj¨ orklund Svensson, L. Boulton, J. Chappell, S. Diederichs, B. Foster, J. Gar- land, P. Gonz´ alez Caminal, G. Loisch,et al., Emittance preservation in a plasma-wakefield accelerator, Nature Communications15, 6097 (2024)

    2024

  10. [17]

    Foster, E

    B. Foster, E. Adli, T. L. Barklow, M. Berggren, S. Boogert, J. B. B. Chen, R. D’Arcy, P. Drobniak, S. Gessner, M. J. Hogan,et al., Proceedings of the erice workshop: A new baseline for the hybrid, asymmetric, linear higgs factory halhf, Physics Open , 100261 (2025)

    2025

  11. [18]

    Galletti, R

    M. Galletti, R. Assmann, M. Couprie, M. Ferrario, L. Gi- annessi, A. Irman, R. Pompili, and W. Wang, Prospects for free-electron lasers powered by plasma-wakefield- accelerated beams, Nature Photonics18, 780 (2024)

    2024

  12. [19]

    Assmann, M

    R. Assmann, M. Weikum, T. Akhter, D. Alesini, A. Alexandrova, M. Anania, N. Andreev, I. Andriyash, M. Artioli, A. Aschikhin,et al., Eupraxia conceptual de- sign report, The European Physical Journal Special Top- ics229, 3675 (2020)

    2020

  13. [20]

    Antipov, A

    S. Antipov, A. Ferran Pousa, I. Agapov, R. Brinkmann, A. Maier, S. Jalas, L. Jeppe, M. Kirchen, W. Leemans, A. M. de la Ossa,et al., Design of a prototype laser- plasma injector for an electron synchrotron, Physical Re- view Accelerators and Beams24, 111301 (2021)

    2021

  14. [21]

    Ferran Pousa, I

    A. Ferran Pousa, I. Agapov, S. Antipov, R. Assmann, R. Brinkmann, S. Jalas, M. Kirchen, W. Leemans, A. Maier, A. Martinez de la Ossa,et al., Energy com- pression and stabilization of laser-plasma accelerators, Physical review letters129, 094801 (2022)

    2022

  15. [22]

    Agapov, S

    I. Agapov, S. Antipov, R. Brinkmann, A. Ferran Pousa, S. Jalas, M. Kirchen, W. Leemans, A. Maier, A. Mar- tinez de la Ossa, J. Osterhoff, R. Shalloo, M. Th´ evenet, and P. V. Winkler,The Plasma Injector for PETRA IV: Enabling Plasma Accelerators for Next-generation Light Sourc...

    2025

  16. [23]

    Winkler, M

    P. Winkler, M. Trunk, L. H¨ ubner, A. Martinez de la Ossa, S. Jalas, M. Kirchen, I. Agapov, S. Antipov, R. Brinkmann, T. Eichner,et al., Active energy compres- sion of a laser-plasma electron beam, Nature , 1 (2025)

    2025

  17. [24]

    Rovige, J

    L. Rovige, J. Huijts, I. Andriyash, A. Vernier, V. Tomkus, V. Girdauskas, G. Raciukaitis, J. Dudutis, V. Stankevic, P. Gecys,et al., Demonstration of stable long-term op- eration of a kilohertz laser-plasma accelerator, Physical Review Accelerators and Beams23, 093401 (2020)

    2020

  18. [25]

    Jakobsson, S

    O. Jakobsson, S. Hooker, and R. Walczak, Gev-scale ac- celerators driven by plasma-modulated pulses from kilo- hertz lasers, Physical Review Letters127, 184801 (2021)

    2021

  19. [26]

    D’Arcy, J

    R. D’Arcy, J. Chappell, J. Beinortaite, S. Diederichs, G. Boyle, B. Foster, M. J. Garland, P. G. Caminal, C. A. Lindstrøm, G. Loisch,et al., Recovery time of a plasma- wakefield accelerator, Nature603, 58 (2022)

    2022

  20. [27]

    C. G. Durfee and H. M. Milchberg, Light pipe for high intensity laser pulses, Phys. Rev. Lett.71, 2409 (1993)

    1993

  21. [28]

    R. J. Shalloo, C. Arran, L. Corner, J. Holloway, J. Jon- nerby, R. Walczak, H. M. Milchberg, and S. M. Hooker, Hydrodynamic optical-field-ionized plasma channels, Phys. Rev. E97, 053203 (2018)

    2018

  22. [29]

    W. P. Leemans, B. Nagler, A. J. Gonsalves, C. Toth, K. Nakamura, C. G. R. Geddes, E. Esarey, C. B. Schroeder, and S. M. Hooker, Gev electron beams from a centimetre-scale accelerator, Nat Phys2, 696 (2006)

    2006

  23. [30]

    Butler, D

    A. Butler, D. J. Spence, and S. M. Hooker, Guiding of high-intensity laser pulses with a hydrogen-filled capillary discharge waveguide, Phys. Rev. Lett.89, 185003 (2002)

    2002

  24. [31]

    Van Tilborg, S

    J. Van Tilborg, S. Steinke, C. Geddes, N. Matlis, B. Shaw, A. Gonsalves, J. Huijts, K. Nakamura, J. Daniels, C. Schroeder,et al., Active plasma lensing for relativistic laser-plasma-accelerated electron beams, Physical review letters115, 184802 (2015)

    2015

  25. [32]

    A. L. Winfrey, M. A. Abd Al-Halim, J. G. Gilligan, A. V. Saveliev, and M. A. Bourham, A study of plasma pa- rameters in a capillary discharge with calculations using ideal and nonideal plasma models for comparison with experiment, IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science40, 843 (2012)

    2012

  26. [33]

    Bobrova, A

    N. Bobrova, A. Esaulov, J.-I. Sakai, P. Sasorov, D. Spence, A. Butler, S. M. Hooker, and S. Bulanov, Sim- ulations of a hydrogen-filled capillary discharge waveg- uide, Physical Review E65, 016407 (2001)

    2001

  27. [34]

    N. M. Cook, J. Carlsson, P. Moeller, R. Nagler, and P. Tzeferacos, Modeling of capillary discharge plasmas for wakefield acceleration and beam transport, inJournal of Physics: Conference Series, Vol. 1596 (IOP Publishing,

  28. [35]

    G. J. Boyle, M. Th´ evenet, J. Chappell, J. Garland, G. Loisch, J. Osterhoff, and R. D’Arcy, Reduced model of plasma evolution in hydrogen discharge capillary plas- mas, Physical Review E104, 015211 (2021)

    2021

  29. [36]

    G. A. Bagdasarov, P. V. Sasorov, V. A. Gasilov, A. S. Boldarev, O. G. Olkhovskaya, C. Benedetti, S. S. Bu- lanov, A. Gonsalves, H.-S. Mao, C. B. Schroeder, J. van Tilborg, E. Esarey, W. P. Leemans, T. Levato, D. Mar- garone, and G. Korn, Laser beam coupling with capillary disc...

    2017

  30. [37]

    A. J. Gonsalves, K. Nakamura, J. Daniels, C. Benedetti, C. Pieronek, T. C. H. de Raadt, S. Steinke, J. H. Bin, S. S. Bulanov, J. van Tilborg, C. G. R. Ged- des, C. B. Schroeder, C. T´ oth, E. Esarey, K. Swanson, L. Fan-Chiang, G. Bagdasarov, N. Bobrova, V. Gasilov, G. Korn, P....

    2019

  31. [38]

    Arjmand, A

    S. Arjmand, A. Amato, R. Catalano, C. Manna, D. Mas- cali, G. Mauro, D. Oliva, A. Pappalardo, A. Pidatella, J. Suarez,et al., Parametric study of voltage in plasma- discharge capillary systems: a benchmarking of experi- mental and simulation data, Journal of Instrumentation 20...

  32. [39]

    S. M. Mewes, G. J. Boyle, A. Ferran Pousa, R. J. Shalloo, J. Osterhoff, C. Arran, L. Corner, R. Walczak, S. M. Hooker, and M. Th´ evenet, Demonstration of tunability of hofi waveguides via start-to-end simulations, Phys. Rev. Res.5, 033112 (2023). 12

    2023

  33. [40]

    6.3., COMSOL AB, Stock- holm, Sweden., www.comsol.com

    COMSOL Multiphysics ® v. 6.3., COMSOL AB, Stock- holm, Sweden., www.comsol.com

  34. [41]

    Haines, A review of the dense z-pinch, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion53, 093001 (2011)

    M. Haines, A review of the dense z-pinch, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion53, 093001 (2011)

    2011

  35. [42]

    A. Diaw, S. J. Coleman, N. M. Cook, J. P. Edelen, E. C. Hansen, and P. Tzeferacos, Impact of electron transport models on capillary discharge plasmas, Physics of Plas- mas29, 063101 (2022)

    2022

  36. [43]

    J. R. Davies, H. Wen, J.-Y. Ji, and E. D. Held, Trans- port coefficients for magnetic-field evolution in inviscid magnetohydrodynamics, Physics of Plasmas28, 012305 (2021)

    2021

  37. [44]

    Ji and E

    J.-Y. Ji and E. D. Held, Closure and transport theory for high-collisionality electron-ion plasmas, Physics of Plas- mas20, 042114 (2013)

    2013

  38. [45]

    Zel’dovich and Y

    Y. Zel’dovich and Y. Raizer,Physics of Shock Waves and High-Temperature Hydrodynamic Phenomena, Dover Books on Physics (Dover Publications, 2002)

    2002

  39. [46]

    A. S. Richardson,2019 NRL plasma formulary(Naval Research Laboratory Washington, DC, 2019)

    2019

  40. [47]

    R. W. McWhirter, Spectral intensities, inPlasma Di- agnostic Techniques, edited by R. Huddlestone and S. Leonard (Academic Press, New York, 1965) pp. 165– 217

    1965

  41. [48]

    P. G. Martin, W. J. Keogh, and M. E. Mandy, Collision- induced dissociation of molecular hydrogen at low densi- ties, The Astrophysical Journal499, 793 (1998)

    1998

  42. [49]

    W. E. Jones, S. D. Macknight, and L. Teng, Kinetics of atomic hydrogen reactions in the gas phase, Chemical Reviews73, 407 (1973)

    1973

  43. [50]

    Yoon, M.-Y

    J.-S. Yoon, M.-Y. Song, J.-M. Han, S. H. Hwang, W.-S. Chang, B. Lee, and Y. Itikawa, Cross sections for electron collisions with hydrogen molecules, Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data37, 913 (2008)

    2008

  44. [51]

    Boltzmann,Lectures on Gas Theory(University of California Press, 1964)

    L. Boltzmann,Lectures on Gas Theory(University of California Press, 1964)

    1964

  45. [52]

    R. C. Tolman,The principles of statistical mechanics (Courier Corporation, 1979)

    1979

  46. [53]

    Bohm, The characteristics of electrical discharges in magnetic fields, Qualitative Description of the Arc Plasma in a Magnetic Field (1949)

    D. Bohm, The characteristics of electrical discharges in magnetic fields, Qualitative Description of the Arc Plasma in a Magnetic Field (1949)

    1949

  47. [54]

    Godyak, Modified bohm criterion for a collisional plasma, Physics Letters A89, 80 (1982)

    V. Godyak, Modified bohm criterion for a collisional plasma, Physics Letters A89, 80 (1982)

    1982

  48. [55]

    Pekker and N

    L. Pekker and N. Hussary, Effect of boundary conditions on the heat flux to the wall in two-temperature model- ing of ‘thermal’ plasmas, Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics47, 445202 (2014)

    2014

  49. [56]

    Garland, R

    J. Garland, R. D’Arcy, M. Dinter, S. Karstensen, S. Kot- tler, G. Loisch, K. Ludwig, J. Osterhoff, A. Rahali, A. Schleiermacher, and S. Wesch, A discharge plasma source development platform for accelerators: The ad- vance lab at desy, inProc. IPAC’22, International Parti- cle ...

    2022

  50. [57]

    Huck, Development of stable plasma cells with high discharge rates at desy’s advance lab, in10th annual meeting of the Matter and Technologies(2024)

    M. Huck, Development of stable plasma cells with high discharge rates at desy’s advance lab, in10th annual meeting of the Matter and Technologies(2024)

    2024

  51. [58]

    M. A. Gigosos, M. A. Gonz´ alez, and V. Carde˜ noso, Com- puter simulated balmer-alpha, -beta and -gamma stark line profiles for non-equilibrium plasmas diagnostics, Spectrochimica Acta Part B: Atomic Spectroscopy58, 1489 (2003), 5th European Furnace Symposium and 10th Interna...

    2003

  52. [59]

    Mijatovi´ c, S

    Z. Mijatovi´ c, S. Djurovi´ c, L. Gavanski, T. Gajo, A. Favre, V. Morel, and A. Bultel, Plasma density determination by using hydrogen balmer hαspectral line with improved accuracy, Spectrochimica Acta Part B: Atomic Spec- troscopy166, 105821 (2020)

    2020

  53. [60]

    Konjevi´ c, M

    N. Konjevi´ c, M. Ivkovi´ c, and N. Sakan, Hydrogen balmer lines for low electron number density plasma diagnostics, Spectrochimica Acta Part B: Atomic Spectroscopy76, 16 (2012)

    2012

  54. [62]

    Griem,Principles of Plasma Spectroscopy(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997)

    H. Griem,Principles of Plasma Spectroscopy(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997)

    1997

  55. [63]

    Griem, Stark broadening of the hydrogen balmer- alpha line in low and high density plasmas, Contributions to Plasma Physics40, 46 (2000)

    H. Griem, Stark broadening of the hydrogen balmer- alpha line in low and high density plasmas, Contributions to Plasma Physics40, 46 (2000)

    2000

  56. [64]

    J. M. Garland, G. Tauscher, S. Bohlen, G. J. Boyle, R. D’Arcy, L. Goldberg, K. P˜ oder, L. Schaper, B. Schmidt, and J. Osterhoff, Combining laser interfer- ometry and plasma spectroscopy for spatially resolved high-sensitivity plasma density measurements in dis- charge capilla...

    2021

  57. [65]

    Drobniak, E

    P. Drobniak, E. Adli, H. B. Anderson, A. Dyson, S. Mewes, K. Sjobak, M. Th´ evenet, and C. Lindstrøm, Development of a nonlinear plasma lens for achromatic beam transport, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrome- ters, Detectors a...

    2025

  58. [66]

    Mitchner and C

    M. Mitchner and C. H. Kruger Jr,Partially ionized gases (John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, 1973)

    1973

  59. [67]

    R. E. Peierls,Surprises in theoretical physics, Vol. 10 (Princeton University Press, 1979)

    1979

  60. [68]

    D. V. Schroeder,An introduction to thermal physics(Ox- ford University Press, 2020)

    2020

  61. [69]

    Pardini, S

    L. Pardini, S. Legnaioli, G. Lorenzetti, V. Palleschi, R. Gaudiuso, A. De Giacomo, D. Diaz Pace, F. An- abitarte Garcia, G. de Holanda Cavalcanti, and C. Parig- ger, On the determination of plasma electron num- ber density from stark broadened hydrogen balmer se- ries lines in...

    2013

  62. [70]

    Callaway and K

    J. Callaway and K. Unnikrishnan, Shift and width of the balmer-αand lyman-βlines of neutral hydrogen due to electron collisions, Phys. Rev. A44, 3001 (1991)

    1991

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.