Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 37 references

Microscale Hydrodynamic Cloaking via Geometry Design in a Depth-Varying Hele-Shaw Cell

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A single depth step renders microscale objects flow-invisible when the channel height around them is set to one formula value.

desk verdict A clean analytical correction to the depth-averaged cloaking condition, but the 3D validation is too visual to support the 'perfect' claim at the sharp depth step. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.16863 v1 pith:EIFNQTDJ submitted 2025-06-20 physics.flu-dyn

Hongyu Liu , Zhi-Qiang Miao , Guang-Hui Zheng This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.flu-dyn
keywords hydrodynamiccloakingHele-Shawcelllubricationapproximationdepth-varyingmicrochannelscatteringcancellationneutralinclusionmicrofluidicsgeometrydesign
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims a passive way to make a pillar invisible to slow pressure-driven flow in a shallow channel: cut the floor over a surrounding ring to a single uniform depth. In a depth-averaged Hele-Shaw model, flow obeys $\nabla_\parallel \cdot (h^3 \nabla_\parallel p)=0$, and a ring of the right depth cancels the dipolar disturbance, leaving the exterior pressure and velocity identical to the uniform background flow. For a circular object the required depth is $\tilde h_c = \tilde h_0[(\tilde r_e^2+\tilde r_i^2)/(\tilde r_e^2-\tilde r_i^2)]^{1/3}$; for confocal ellipses it is $\tilde h_c = \tilde h_0[\tanh\xi_e\coth(\xi_e-\xi_i)]^{1/3}$. For arbitrary shapes the paper finds the best uniform depth by optimization, and for multiple objects it uses volume-conserving neutral-inclusion splitting. Three-dimensional finite-element simulations confirm that exterior isobars and streamlines stay straight, which would make hydrodynamic cloaking a single lithographic step rather than a metamaterial construction.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the depth-averaged Hele-Shaw pressure equation $\nabla_\parallel \cdot (h^3 \nabla_\parallel p)=0$, derived from the lubrication approximation for shallow, low-Reynolds-number flow, together with the interface matching conditions at the depth step: pressure continuity and continuity of the normal flux $h^3 \partial_n p$. In polar coordinates the outer pressure field contains a dipolar term proportional to $r^{-1}\cos\theta$, and the cloaking depth is chosen so that this term vanishes, which is a scattering-cancellation condition. The same mechanism in elliptical coordinates produces the confocal elliptical cloaking depth, while the optimization method replaces the exact cancellation condition with a least-squares minimization of the flux mismatch on the outer boundary.

What would settle it

Make a circular pillar of radius 100 micrometers with a cloak radius 200 micrometers in a 15-micrometer-deep chamber and etch the annular region to 17.78 micrometers, the value predicted by the formula; then measure exterior streamlines under pressure-driven flow. If the streamlines outside the ring are deflected beyond experimental uncertainty, or if the deflection-minimizing depth differs measurably from 17.78 micrometers, the flux-matching condition at the depth step is not the right effective condition.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a uniform-depth annular region around a cylindrical object in a shallow Hele-Shaw cell cancels the exterior flow disturbance exactly when the cloaking depth satisfies $\tilde h_c = \tilde h_0[(\tilde r_e^2+\tilde r_i^2)/(\tilde r_e^2-\tilde r_i^2)]^{1/3}$ for a circular object and $\tilde h_c = \tilde h_0[\tanh\xi_e\coth(\xi_e-\xi_i)]^{1/3}$ for a confocal elliptical object. At those depths, the dipolar term in the outer pressure field vanishes, so the exterior pressure gradient and depth-averaged velocity are the uniform background flow, indistinguishable from a channel with no object at all. For objects of arbitrary cross-section, the paper claims that an optimal uniform cloak depth can be found by minimizing the flux mismatch on the outer boundary of the cloaking region. For multiple objects, it claims that a volume-conserving splitting of one object into several constituents preserves the single-object cloaking behavior. All of these claims are made within the depth-averaged lubrication model and are validated by three-dimensional finite-element simulations in which exterior isobars and streamlines remain straight.

Load-bearing premise

The whole construction rests on the depth-averaged model staying accurate right at the sharp step in channel depth; if three-dimensional flow effects at that step change how much fluid passes through, the exact depths will not cancel the disturbance.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • With the annular depth set by the circular or elliptical formula, the flow outside the cloak is exactly the uniform background flow within the depth-averaged model; no exterior disturbance remains for a single pillar.
  • The cloaking depth depends only on geometry and the background depth, not on viscosity or flow speed, so the same structure works for any fluid and any driving rate inside the low-Reynolds lubrication regime.
  • For arbitrarily shaped objects, an optimal uniform depth can be computed by minimizing a boundary flux mismatch, giving approximate cloaking for flower, kite, triangle, and square cross-sections.
  • Multiple objects can be cloaked by volume-conserving splitting of a single object, with configurations of four and eight objects demonstrated numerically.
  • Because the cloak is a single depth step, it can be fabricated with straightforward lithographic depth control, avoiding the spatially varying permeability needed in metamaterial hydrodynamic cloaks.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The analytical derivation assumes an unbounded chamber, so the exact formula may need a small correction when the chamber walls are only a few cloak radii away; varying the chamber aspect ratio in simulations would quantify this.
  • The volume-conserving splitting principle suggests a modular design rule: a cluster of small pillars with the same total cross-sectional area as one large pillar should be cloaked by the same annular depth, provided the cluster fits inside the cloak boundary.
  • The paper leaves shielding to future work, but the same depth-step geometry with a different depth should reduce the hydrodynamic force on the object; that regime is a natural testable extension.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a metamaterial-free approach to hydrodynamic cloaking in microscale Hele-Shaw cells by tailoring the channel depth in an annular region around a pillar-like object. Within a depth-averaged lubrication model, the authors derive analytical cloaking conditions: Eq. (9) for a circular cylindrical object in a circular annular cloak and Eq. (10) for a confocal elliptical geometry. For arbitrary object shapes, they formulate an optimization problem that determines a constant optimal depth in a prescribed cloaking region, and they extend the scheme to multiple objects using a volume-conserving splitting heuristic. The claims are supported by three-dimensional COMSOL simulations showing pressure and streamline fields for circular, elliptical, irregular, and multi-object configurations.

Significance. If the analytical cloaking conditions are taken at the level of the depth-averaged model, the derivation in Appendix B is clean, self-contained, and parameter-free, and the paper offers a conceptually simple fabrication route compared with metamaterial-based hydrodynamic cloaks. The correction of the cube-root discrepancy relative to Tay et al. is a useful contribution. The main limitation is that the numerical validation is qualitative and does not quantitatively establish that Eq. (9) and Eq. (10) describe the physical 3D flow optimum; the multi-object design rests on an unproven heuristic. The central idea is promising, but the strength of the claims currently exceeds the evidence.

major comments (3)
  1. [§III, Fig. 2] The numerical validation for the circular and elliptical cloaks is purely visual: the paper shows isobars and streamlines but reports no quantitative measure of the residual exterior flow disturbance, no comparison between the simulated optimal depth and Eqs. (9)/(10), and no sweep of the cloak depth around the predicted value. Since the manuscript claims “perfect cloaking performance,” a quantitative error metric (e.g., the L2 norm of the velocity deviation from the uniform far field in the exterior region) is needed, together with a demonstration that the minimum occurs at the predicted depth and that the result converges with mesh refinement and aspect ratio ε = h0/r0.
  2. [Appendix A, Eq. (2)] The load-bearing physical approximation is the use of the lubrication relation ⟨u∥⟩ = −(h^2/12µ)∇∥p all the way up to the vertical wall at the depth step. At the step, the local flow is genuinely three-dimensional over a length scale of order h0, so the effective conductance of the annular cloak differs from the depth-averaged prediction by an amount of order h0/re. For the parameters in Fig. 2, h0/re = 15/200 = 0.075, so a shift of several percent in the physical optimal depth is plausible. This does not invalidate the depth-averaged derivation, but it means Eq. (9) is only a leading-order prediction, and the claim of “exact” cloaking in the physical 3D cell requires quantitative support.
  3. [§II C, Fig. 4] The multi-object cloaking design rests on the “volume-conserving splitting principle,” stated as the assertion that flow disturbances are primarily determined by the total invasive volume. No derivation, rigorous statement, or reference is provided for this principle, and its validity is not established by quantitative numerical tests: Fig. 4 only shows field plots with no error metric. As the multi-object result is one of the paper’s advertised contributions, either a proof or a quantitative validation (e.g., comparing the exterior disturbance for the split configuration against the single-object cloak as a function of separation and number of objects) is needed.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§II, Eq. (5)] The flux-matching condition appears to have the depths reversed: the text writes (h0⟨u∥⟩_in)·n = (hc⟨u∥⟩_out)·n, but since the cloak interior has depth hc and the exterior has depth h0, the correct condition should read (hc⟨u∥⟩_in)·n = (h0⟨u∥⟩_out)·n, which is the form actually used in Appendix B.
  2. [§IV, Conclusions] The sentence “While hydrodynamic shielding concepts are not addressed herein, as they require control-region depths that would violate depth-averaged model assumptions” is an incomplete sentence and leaves the claimed limitation unexplained; please revise and, if possible, quantify the depth range for which the depth-averaged model is valid.
  3. [Fig. 3 caption] The caption labels flower and kite shapes as “regular” and triangle and square as “irregular”; the basis for this classification is unclear and should be stated or the wording changed.
  4. [§I, comparison with Tay et al.] The sentence about the cube-root discrepancy with Tay et al. is stated without the explicit formula comparison; a brief derivation or equation number would help readers assess the claimed discrepancy.
  5. [§III, final paragraph] The statement that the 3D simulations show “excellent agreement with theoretical predictions” is not supported by any quantitative comparison; please add error values or soften the claim.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No circularity: Eqs. (9)-(10) are derived from the depth-averaged model, not fitted to simulations; the only self-citation (optimization existence) is not load-bearing.

full rationale

The central cloaking formulas are self-contained. In Appendix B the paper solves the depth-averaged equation for a piecewise-constant depth annulus and imposes the exterior uniform-flow condition (8); setting the dipole coefficient of the outer pressure field to zero yields Eq. (9) directly, and the confocal elliptical result Eq. (10) follows by the same construction. These are first-principles scattering-cancellation calculations, with no parameter fitted to the COMSOL outputs. The optimization method's existence, uniqueness, and stability are cited to the authors' prior Ref. 24, but that theorem is proved there and does not enter the derivation of Eqs. (9)-(10); it is a non-load-bearing self-citation. The multi-object design adopts an explicitly stated neutral-inclusion heuristic about volume-dominated disturbances; this is an additional modeling assumption, not a circular reduction of the single-object theory. The numerical validation is qualitative and lacks quantitative error quantification, but that is an evidence-strength or correctness concern, not a circularity concern. No load-bearing predictive claim reduces by construction to its inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central analytical results rest on standard lubrication theory and clean solutions of Laplace's equation; no free parameters are fitted to the numerical results. The main added assumptions are the domain-specific depth-averaged interface conditions and the heuristic multi-object splitting principle. The optimization method's existence is borrowed from the authors' prior work.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Lubrication approximation applies: depth h is much smaller than in-plane lengths and inertia is negligible (ε << 1, εRe << 1).
    Used to derive the depth-averaged equation div(h^3 grad p)=0 in Appendix A; the entire theory depends on this assumption.
  • domain assumption Matching conditions at the sharp depth discontinuity require pressure and flux continuity (Eq. 5).
    The step change in depth at the cloak boundary is modeled with depth-averaged flux continuity; local three-dimensional entrance effects are neglected.
  • domain assumption Unbounded domain approximation: chamber side walls are far enough that the far-field uniform flow boundary condition is valid.
    Analytical solutions in Appendix B assume an unbounded domain; the finite 2 mm by 1.4 mm chamber may introduce boundary effects.
  • domain assumption Existence, uniqueness, and stability of the optimization minimizer.
    In Sec. II B the authors state these can be rigorously established 'Analogous to 24' (their prior work), but do not provide a proof here.
  • ad hoc to paper Volume-conserving splitting principle: flow disturbance is primarily determined by the total invasive volume.
    Stated in Sec. II C as the design foundation for multi-object cloaks; no derivation or quantitative justification is given.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Microscale Hydrodynamic Cloaking via Geometry Design in a Depth-Varying Hele-Shaw Cell." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/EIFNQTDJ

@misc{pith2026250616863,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Microscale Hydrodynamic Cloaking via Geometry Design in a Depth-Varying Hele-Shaw Cell},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/EIFNQTDJ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.16863}
}
read the original abstract

We theoretically and numerically demonstrate that hydrodynamic cloaking can be achieved by simply adjusting the geometric depth of a region surrounding an object in microscale flow, rendering the external flow field undisturbed. Using the depth-averaged model, we develop a theoretical framework based on analytical solutions for circular and confocal elliptical cloaks. For cloaks of arbitrary shape, we employ an optimization method to determine the optimal depth profile within the cloaking region. Furthermore, we propose a multi-object hydrodynamic cloak design incorporating neutral inclusion theory. All findings are validated numerically. The presented cloaks feature simpler structures than their metamaterial-based counterparts and offer straightforward fabrication, thus holding significant potential for microfluidic applications.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.16863 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Schematic of a depth-varying Hele-Shaw cell. (a) Microfluidic chamber with a circular cylinder confined between parallel plates. A [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Perfect hydrodynamic cloaking for cylindrical and confo [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4. Approximate multi-object cloaking for: (a,b) four circu [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Approximate cloaking for arbitrary-shaped objects: (a,b) reg [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png]

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

37 extracted references · 30 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Leonhardt ,\ title title Optical conformal mapping , \ 10.1126/science.1126493 journal journal Science \ volume 312 ,\ pages 1777--1780 ( year 2006 ) NoStop

    author author U. Leonhardt ,\ title title Optical conformal mapping , \ 10.1126/science.1126493 journal journal Science \ volume 312 ,\ pages 1777--1780 ( year 2006 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1126/science.1126493 2006

  2. [2]

    author author J. B. \ Pendry , author D. Schurig , \ and\ author D. R. \ Smith ,\ title title Controlling electromagnetic fields , \ 10.1126/science.1125907 journal journal Science \ volume 312 ,\ pages 1780--1782 ( year 2006 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1126/science.1125907

  3. [3]

    Al\`u \ and\ author N

    author author A. Al\`u \ and\ author N. Engheta ,\ title title Achieving transparency with plasmonic and metamaterial coatings , \ 10.1103/PhysRevE.72.016623 journal journal Phys. Rev. E \ volume 72 ,\ pages 016623 ( year 2005 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/physreve.72.016623

  4. [4]

    Schurig , author J

    author author D. Schurig , author J. J. \ Mock , author B. J. \ Justice , author S. A. \ Cummer , author J. B. \ Pendry , author A. F. \ Starr , \ and\ author D. R. \ Smith ,\ title title Metamaterial electromagnetic cloak at microwave frequencies , \ 10.1126/science.1133628 journal journal Science \ volume 314 ,\ pages 977--980 ( year 2006 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1126/science.1133628

  5. [5]

    Valentine , author J

    author author J. Valentine , author J. Li , author T. Zentgraf , author G. Bartal , \ and\ author X. Zhang ,\ title title An optical cloak made of dielectrics , \ 10.1038/nmat2461 journal journal Nature materials \ volume 8 ,\ pages 568--571 ( year 2009 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1038/nmat2461

  6. [6]

    Zhang , author D

    author author S. Zhang , author D. A. \ Genov , author C. Sun , \ and\ author X. Zhang ,\ title title Cloaking of matter waves , \ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.123002 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 100 ,\ pages 123002 ( year 2008 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.100.123002

  7. [7]

    Farhat , author S

    author author M. Farhat , author S. Guenneau , \ and\ author S. Enoch ,\ title title Ultrabroadband elastic cloaking in thin plates , \ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.024301 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 103 ,\ pages 024301 ( year 2009 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.103.024301

  8. [8]

    Stenger , author M

    author author N. Stenger , author M. Wilhelm , \ and\ author M. Wegener ,\ title title Experiments on elastic cloaking in thin plates , \ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.014301 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 108 ,\ pages 014301 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.108.014301

Show all 37 references
  1. [9]

    Yang , author Z

    author author F. Yang , author Z. L. \ Mei , author T. Y. \ Jin , \ and\ author T. J. \ Cui ,\ title title dc electric invisibility cloak , \ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.053902 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 109 ,\ pages 053902 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    doi

  2. [10]

    Narayana \ and\ author Y

    author author S. Narayana \ and\ author Y. Sato ,\ title title Heat flux manipulation with engineered thermal materials , \ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.214303 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 108 ,\ pages 214303 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    doi

  3. [11]

    Schittny , author M

    author author R. Schittny , author M. Kadic , author S. Guenneau , \ and\ author M. Wegener ,\ title title Experiments on transformation thermodynamics: Molding the flow of heat , \ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.195901 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 110 ,\ pages 195901 ( ...

    doi

  4. [12]

    Deng , author H

    author author Y. Deng , author H. Liu , \ and\ author G. U. \ and ,\ title title On regularized full- and partial-cloaks in acoustic scattering , \ 10.1080/03605302.2017.1286673 journal journal Communications in Partial Differential Equations \ volume 42 ,\ pages 821--851 ( ye...

    2017

  5. [13]

    Deng , author H

    author author Y. Deng , author H. Liu , \ and\ author G. Uhlmann ,\ title title Full and partial cloaking in electromagnetic scattering , \ 10.1007/s00205-016-1035-6 journal journal Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis \ volume 223 ,\ pages 265--299 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    doi

  6. [14]

    author author S. A. \ Cummer , author B.-I. \ Popa , author D. Schurig , author D. R. \ Smith , author J. Pendry , author M. Rahm , \ and\ author A. Starr ,\ title title Scattering theory derivation of a 3d acoustic cloaking shell , \ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.024301 journal jou...

    doi

  7. [15]

    author author H. Liu ,\ title title Virtual reshaping and invisibility in obstacle scattering , \ 10.1088/0266-5611/25/4/045006 journal journal Inverse Problems \ volume 25 ,\ pages 045006 ( year 2009 ) NoStop

    2009 doi

  8. [16]

    Zhang , author C

    author author S. Zhang , author C. Xia , \ and\ author N. Fang ,\ title title Broadband acoustic cloak for ultrasound waves , \ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.024301 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 106 ,\ pages 024301 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

    doi

  9. [17]

    author author Y. A. \ Urzhumov \ and\ author D. R. \ Smith ,\ title title Fluid flow control with transformation media , \ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.074501 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 107 ,\ pages 074501 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

    doi

  10. [18]

    author author Y. A. \ Urzhumov \ and\ author D. R. \ Smith ,\ title title Flow stabilization with active hydrodynamic cloaks , \ 10.1103/PhysRevE.86.056313 journal journal Phys. Rev. E \ volume 86 ,\ pages 056313 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    2012 doi

  11. [19]

    Park , author J

    author author J. Park , author J. R. \ Youn , \ and\ author Y. S. \ Song ,\ title title Hydrodynamic metamaterial cloak for drag-free flow , \ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.074502 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 123 ,\ pages 074502 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    doi

  12. [20]

    Farhat , author S

    author author M. Farhat , author S. Enoch , author S. Guenneau , \ and\ author A. B. \ Movchan ,\ title title Broadband cylindrical acoustic cloak for linear surface waves in a fluid , \ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.134501 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 101 ,\ pages 1345...

    doi

  13. [21]

    Zou , author Y

    author author S. Zou , author Y. Xu , author R. Zatianina , author C. Li , author X. Liang , author L. Zhu , author Y. Zhang , author G. Liu , author Q. H. \ Liu , author H. Chen , \ and\ author Z. Wang ,\ title title Broadband waveguide cloak for water waves , \ 10.1103/PhysR...

    doi

  14. [22]

    Zhang , author S

    author author Z. Zhang , author S. Liu , author Z. Luan , author Z. Wang , \ and\ author G. He ,\ title title Invisibility concentrator for water waves , \ 10.1063/5.0019129 journal journal Physics of Fluids \ volume 32 ,\ pages 081701 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    doi

  15. [23]

    Boyko , author V

    author author E. Boyko , author V. Bacheva , author M. Eigenbrod , author F. Paratore , author A. D. \ Gat , author S. Hardt , \ and\ author M. Bercovici ,\ title title Microscale hydrodynamic cloaking and shielding via electro-osmosis , \ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.184502 journa...

    doi

  16. [24]

    Liu , author Z.-Q

    author author H. Liu , author Z.-Q. \ Miao , \ and\ author G.-H. \ Zheng ,\ title title A mathematical theory of microscale hydrodynamic cloaking and shielding by electro-osmosis , \ 10.1137/23M1554837 journal journal SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics \ volume 84 ,\ pages 26...

    doi

  17. [25]

    Liu , author Z.-Q

    author author H. Liu , author Z.-Q. \ Miao , \ and\ author G.-H. \ Zheng ,\ title title Enhanced microscale hydrodynamic near-cloaking using electro-osmosis , \ 10.1088/1361-6420/ad7283 journal journal Inverse Problems \ volume 40 ,\ pages 105008 ( year 2024 b ) NoStop

    doi

  18. [26]

    Kong , author L

    author author L. Kong , author L. Zhu , author Y. Deng , \ and\ author H. Liu ,\ title title Electro-osmotic flow within multilayer microfluidic structures and an algebraic framework for hydrodynamic cloaking and shielding , \ 10.1137/24M1674078 journal journal SIAM Journal on...

    doi

  19. [27]

    Liu , author Z.-Q

    author author H. Liu , author Z.-Q. \ Miao , \ and\ author G.-H. \ Zheng ,\ title title Simultaneously cloaking electric and hydrodynamic fields via electro-osmosis , \ 10.1137/24M1647874 journal journal SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics \ volume 84 ,\ pages 2175--2198 ( yea...

    doi

  20. [28]

    Tay , author Y

    author author F. Tay , author Y. Zhang , author H. Xu , author H. Goh , author Y. Luo , \ and\ author B. Zhang ,\ title title A metamaterial-free fluid-flow cloak , \ 10.1093/nsr/nwab205 journal journal National Science Review \ volume 9 ,\ pages nwab205 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

    doi

  21. [29]

    Zhou , author F

    author author Y. Zhou , author F. Yang , author G. Dai , author X. Zhou , author P. Jin , \ and\ author J. Huang ,\ title title Invisible hydrodynamic tweezers based on near-zero index materials , \ 10.48550/arXiv.2412.00130 journal journal arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.00130 \ ( ...

    doi arXiv

  22. [30]

    He , author Y

    author author Y. He , author Y. Wu , author J.-z. \ Fu , author Q. Gao , \ and\ author J.-j. \ Qiu ,\ title title Developments of 3d printing microfluidics and applications in chemistry and biology: a review , \ https://doi.org/10.1002/elan.201600043 journal journal Electroana...

    doi

  23. [31]

    Chen , author J

    author author H. Chen , author J. Yang , author J. Zi , \ and\ author C. T. \ Chan ,\ title title Transformation media for linear liquid surface waves , \ 10.1209/0295-5075/85/24004 journal journal Europhysics Letters \ volume 85 ,\ pages 24004 ( year 2009 ) NoStop

    doi

  24. [32]

    Zhao , author X

    author author X. Zhao , author X. Hu , \ and\ author J. Zi ,\ title title Fast water waves in stationary surface disk arrays , \ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.254501 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 127 ,\ pages 254501 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

    doi

  25. [33]

    Hua , author C

    author author Y. Hua , author C. Qian , author H. Chen , \ and\ author H. Wang ,\ title title Experimental topology-optimized cloak for water waves , \ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtphys.2022.100754 journal journal Materials Today Physics \ volume 27 ,\ pages 100754 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

    2022

  26. [34]

    Han , author S

    author author L. Han , author S. Chen , \ and\ author H. Chen ,\ title title Water wave polaritons , \ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.204501 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 128 ,\ pages 204501 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

    2022 doi

  27. [35]

    Zhou \ and\ author G

    author author X. Zhou \ and\ author G. Hu ,\ title title Design for electromagnetic wave transparency with metamaterials , \ 10.1103/PhysRevE.74.026607 journal journal Phys. Rev. E \ volume 74 ,\ pages 026607 ( year 2006 ) NoStop

    2006 doi

  28. [36]

    He \ and\ author L

    author author X. He \ and\ author L. Wu ,\ title title Thermal transparency with the concept of neutral inclusion , \ 10.1103/PhysRevE.88.033201 journal journal Phys. Rev. E \ volume 88 ,\ pages 033201 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

    2013 doi

  29. [37]

    Wang , author B

    author author H. Wang , author B. Wang , author N.-Z. \ Yao , author Z. Xiao , author C.-L. \ Wu , author X. Wang , \ and\ author X. Wang ,\ title title Metamaterial-free, zero-drag, spherical hydrodynamic cloaks enabled by machine learning , \ 10.1063/5.0251301 journal journa...

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.