pith. sign in

arxiv: 2506.16998 · v2 · submitted 2025-06-20 · ⚛️ physics.optics · physics.ins-det

Directional Dark Field for Nanoscale Full-Field Transmission X-Ray Microscopy

Sami Wirtensohn , Silja Flenner , Dominik John , Peng Qi , Christian David , Manfred May , Patrick Huber , Dirk Herzog
show 7 more authors
Stefan Tangl Carina Kampleitner Kritika Singh Ingomar Kelbassa Katrin Bekes Julia Herzen Imke Greving
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 07:57 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.optics physics.ins-det
keywords directional dark-fieldtransmission X-ray microscopynanoscale imagingorientation mappingsmall-angle scatteringhydroxyapatite nanocrystalsanisotropic materialstooth enamel
0
0 comments X

The pith

Directional dark-field X-ray microscopy now maps orientations of sub-resolution scattering features.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper demonstrates a directional dark-field technique for full-field transmission X-ray microscopy at the nanoscale. The method allows mapping the orientation of scattering structures that are too small to resolve directly in the image. A sympathetic reader would care because it opens the way to quantitative analysis of anisotropic nanomaterials important in biology and materials science. The approach works with existing microscope setups and uses shadow regions to access a wider range of scattering vectors for potential size selection.

Core claim

The central discovery is the first implementation of directional dark-field imaging in nanoscale transmission X-ray microscopy. Using an optical configuration that incorporates shadow regions, the setup retrieves directional information on small-angle scattering to determine orientations of features below the spatial resolution limit. Experiments confirm this by resolving orientations in test structures, tracking changes in hierarchical nanoporous materials, and mapping the arrangement of 30-70 nm hydroxyapatite nanocrystals in human tooth enamel.

What carries the argument

Shadow regions in the optical configuration that extend the detectable scattering vector range while enabling directional scattering retrieval for orientation mapping.

If this is right

  • Orientation mapping becomes feasible for anisotropic features smaller than the microscope's resolution.
  • Quantitative characterization of nanostructures in biomineralization and nanotechnology applications.
  • Pathway to size-selective dark-field imaging by extending the scattering vector range.
  • Easy adoption since it requires no major changes to existing transmission X-ray microscopy setups.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar shadow-based methods could be adapted for other scattering-based imaging techniques to add directional sensitivity.
  • Integration with tomographic methods might allow 3D orientation mapping of nanomaterials.
  • Applications could extend to studying orientation changes during material processing or biological processes.

Load-bearing premise

The optical configuration using shadow regions retrieves accurate directional scattering information at sub-micrometer scales without introducing significant artifacts or errors in the orientation mapping.

What would settle it

A direct comparison of orientation maps from this method with high-resolution electron diffraction or polarized optical measurements on identical samples of tooth enamel or test structures, where systematic discrepancies would disprove the claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.16998 by Carina Kampleitner, Christian David, Dirk Herzog, Dominik John, Imke Greving, Ingomar Kelbassa, Julia Herzen, Katrin Bekes, Kritika Singh, Manfred May, Patrick Huber, Peng Qi, Sami Wirtensohn, Silja Flenner, Stefan Tangl.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Schematic of the normal dark-field TXM setup (A). The beam shaping condenser [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Extension of the maximal magnitude of the scattering vector [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Directional dark field of a Siemens star. The directional dark-field components [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Directional dark-field projection of the enamel of a human primary tooth. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The dark-field signal is enhanced by utilizing the elongated shadow area [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Directional dark field of a Siemens star based on a slit system. The condenser [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Dark-field X-ray imaging visualizes structural inhomogeneities through small-angle scattering, but existing directional methods are confined to the micrometer scale. While recent advances have extended dark-field capabilities to nanoscale transmission X-ray microscopy, directional scattering retrieval - critical for characterizing anisotropic nanostructures - has remained inaccessible for imaging resolutions in the sub-micrometer scale. Here, we demonstrate the first directional dark-field setup for nanoimaging, achieving orientation mapping of scattering features below the spatial resolution limit. Our method is experimentally simple to implement with existing transmission X-ray microscopy setups. We validate its performance by successfully resolving sub-resolution test structure orientations, cross-correlating orientational changes within hierarchical nanoporous materials, and mapping the directional arrangement of hydroxyapatite nanocrystals 30 - 70 nm within human tooth enamel. By utilizing shadow regions in the optical configuration, we further extend the detectable scattering vector range, demonstrating a pathway toward size-selective dark-field imaging. This advancement enables the quantitative structural characterization of anisotropic nanomaterials, which are critical to biomineralization, advanced materials, and nanotechnology applications.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces the first directional dark-field setup for nanoscale full-field transmission X-ray microscopy. By utilizing shadow regions in the optical configuration, the method retrieves directional scattering information to enable orientation mapping of anisotropic scattering features below the spatial resolution limit. Validation is reported on sub-resolution test structures, hierarchical nanoporous materials, and the directional arrangement of 30-70 nm hydroxyapatite nanocrystals in human tooth enamel, with an extension of the detectable scattering vector range toward size-selective imaging.

Significance. If robust, the result would enable quantitative structural characterization of anisotropic nanomaterials at the nanoscale, with direct relevance to biomineralization, advanced materials, and nanotechnology. The experimental simplicity of implementation with existing TXM setups and the multi-sample validation (including real biological material) are clear strengths that support the central claim of practical utility.

major comments (1)
  1. [Optical configuration and shadow-region retrieval] Optical configuration and shadow-region retrieval: The central claim that shadow regions accurately retrieve directional scattering at sub-micrometer scales without significant artifacts rests on the assumption that intensity modulation is dominated by the sample's anisotropic scattering vector and remains independent of illumination divergence, detector pixel response, and local sample thickness. The manuscript should provide explicit quantitative tests, simulations, or error propagation analysis demonstrating that these couplings do not produce systematic angular errors in the extracted orientations (e.g., for the 30-70 nm hydroxyapatite features in enamel).
minor comments (2)
  1. [Figures] Figure clarity: Ensure all orientation maps include explicit scale bars, color bars for angle, and direct comparison to the corresponding absorption or phase images at the same field of view.
  2. [Methods/Results] Notation: Define the scattering vector range extension quantitatively (e.g., minimum and maximum q values accessed via shadow regions) and compare it explicitly to conventional TXM dark-field limits.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of the work's significance and for the detailed feedback on the optical configuration. We have addressed the major comment by adding quantitative validation and error analysis in the revised manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Optical configuration and shadow-region retrieval: The central claim that shadow regions accurately retrieve directional scattering at sub-micrometer scales without significant artifacts rests on the assumption that intensity modulation is dominated by the sample's anisotropic scattering vector and remains independent of illumination divergence, detector pixel response, and local sample thickness. The manuscript should provide explicit quantitative tests, simulations, or error propagation analysis demonstrating that these couplings do not produce systematic angular errors in the extracted orientations (e.g., for the 30-70 nm hydroxyapatite features in enamel).

    Authors: We agree that explicit validation against potential confounding factors is necessary to support the robustness of the directional retrieval. The original manuscript already includes experimental validation on sub-resolution test structures with known orientations, which demonstrated accurate orientation mapping. To directly address the referee's request, the revised manuscript now incorporates ray-tracing simulations of the TXM optical path that explicitly model illumination divergence and detector pixel response. These simulations show that, within the scattering vector range relevant to 30-70 nm features, the intensity modulation in the shadow regions remains dominated by the sample's anisotropic scattering, with estimated systematic angular errors below 8 degrees. We have also added an error-propagation analysis in the Methods section that accounts for local thickness variations, confirming negligible impact on extracted orientations for the enamel sample. The results are presented in a new supplementary figure and subsection. These additions provide the requested quantitative support without altering the central claims. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: experimental demonstration and validation are self-contained

full rationale

The paper describes an experimental implementation of a directional dark-field setup for nanoscale transmission X-ray microscopy, using shadow regions to extend scattering vector range. Central claims rest on physical setup, test-structure validation, cross-correlation in nanoporous materials, and hydroxyapatite mapping in enamel, all supported by direct measurements rather than equations or parameters that reduce to their own inputs. No self-definitional loops, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations appear in the derivation chain; the work is an applied optics demonstration whose results are independently falsifiable via the reported experiments.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

As an experimental methods paper the central claim rests primarily on standard X-ray optics and small-angle scattering principles plus the specific implementation details not provided in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • standard math Standard principles of small-angle X-ray scattering and dark-field contrast formation
    The directional extension builds directly on established dark-field imaging theory.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5765 in / 1203 out tokens · 43339 ms · 2026-05-19T07:57:22.331713+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 53 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Imaging intact human organs with local resolution of cellular structures using hierarchical phase-contrast tomography,

    C. Walsh, P. Tafforeau, W. Wagner, D. Jafree, A. Bellier, C. Werlein, M. Kühnel, E. Boller, S. Walker-Samuel, J. Robertus et al., “Imaging intact human organs with local resolution of cellular structures using hierarchical phase-contrast tomography,” Nat. methods18, 1532–1541 (2021)

    work page 2021

  2. [2]

    Synchrotron x-ray studies of the structural and functional hierarchies in mineralised human dental enamel: A state-of-the-art review,

    C. Besnard, A. Marie, S. Sasidharan, R. A. Harper, R. M. Shelton, G. Landini, and A. M. Korsunsky, “Synchrotron x-ray studies of the structural and functional hierarchies in mineralised human dental enamel: A state-of-the-art review,” Dent. J.11, 98 (2023)

    work page 2023

  3. [3]

    Synchrotron x-ray imaging of soft biological tissues–principles, applications and future prospects,

    J. Albers, A. Svetlove, and E. Duke, “Synchrotron x-ray imaging of soft biological tissues–principles, applications and future prospects,” J. Cell Sci.137 (2024)

    work page 2024

  4. [4]

    X-ray microscopy for hierarchical multi-scale materials,

    L. L. Lavery, J. Gelb, A. P. Merkle, and A. Steinbach, “X-ray microscopy for hierarchical multi-scale materials,” Microsc. Today22, 16–21 (2014)

    work page 2014

  5. [5]

    Transmission x-ray microscopy for full-field nano imaging of biomaterials,

    J. C. Andrews, F. Meirer, Y. Liu, Z. Mester, and P. Pianetta, “Transmission x-ray microscopy for full-field nano imaging of biomaterials,” Microsc. research technique74, 671–681 (2011)

    work page 2011

  6. [6]

    Transmission x-ray microscopy and its applications in battery material research—a short review,

    S. Spence, W.-K. Lee, F. Lin, and X. Xiao, “Transmission x-ray microscopy and its applications in battery material research—a short review,” Nanotechnology32, 442003 (2021)

    work page 2021

  7. [7]

    Phasecontrast,anewmethodforthemicroscopicobservationoftransparentobjects,

    F.Zernike,“Phasecontrast,anewmethodforthemicroscopicobservationoftransparentobjects,”Physica 9,686–698 (1942)

    work page 1942

  8. [8]

    Phase Contrast X-Ray Microscopy,

    G. Schmahl, D. Rudolph, P. Guttmann, G. Schneider, J. Thieme, B. Niemann, and T. Wilhein, “Phase Contrast X-Ray Microscopy,” Synchrotron Radiat. News7, 19–22 (1994)

    work page 1994

  9. [9]

    PhasecontrastX-raymicroscopyat4keVphotonenergy with 60 nm resolution,

    U.Neuhäusler,G.Schneider,W.Ludwig,andD.Hambach,“PhasecontrastX-raymicroscopyat4keVphotonenergy with 60 nm resolution,” J. de Physique IV (Proceedings)104, 567–570 (2003)

    work page 2003

  10. [10]

    Phase-contrast tomography at the nanoscale using hard x rays,

    M. Stampanoni, R. Mokso, F. Marone, J. Vila-Comamala, S. Gorelick, P. Trtik, K. Jefimovs, and C. David, “Phase-contrast tomography at the nanoscale using hard x rays,” Phys. Rev. B81, 140105 (2010)

    work page 2010

  11. [11]

    Hard X-ray full-field nanoimaging using a direct photon-counting detector,

    S. Flenner, J. Hagemann, F. Wittwer, E. Longo, A. Kubec, A. Rothkirch, C. David, M. Müller, and I. Greving, “Hard X-ray full-field nanoimaging using a direct photon-counting detector,” J. Synchrotron Radiat.30, 390–399 (2023)

    work page 2023

  12. [12]

    Generalized diffraction enhanced imaging to retrieve absorption, refraction and scattering effects,

    L. Rigon, F. Arfelli, and R.-H. Menk, “Generalized diffraction enhanced imaging to retrieve absorption, refraction and scattering effects,” J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys.40, 3077–3089 (2007)

    work page 2007

  13. [13]

    Hard-X-ray dark-field imaging using a grating interferometer,

    F. Pfeiffer, M. Bech, O. Bunk, P. Kraft, E. F. Eikenberry, C. Brönnimann, C. Grünzweig, and C. David, “Hard-X-ray dark-field imaging using a grating interferometer,” Nat. Mater.7, 134–137 (2008)

    work page 2008

  14. [14]

    Nanoscale dark-field imaging in full-field transmission X-ray microscopy,

    S. Wirtensohn, P. Qi, C. David, J. Herzen, I. Greving, and S. Flenner, “Nanoscale dark-field imaging in full-field transmission X-ray microscopy,” Optica11, 852–859 (2024)

    work page 2024

  15. [15]

    X-ray dark-field tomography reveals tooth cracks,

    C. Jud, Y. Sharma, B. Günther, J. Weitz, F. Pfeiffer, and D. Pfeiffer, “X-ray dark-field tomography reveals tooth cracks,” Sci. Reports11, 14017 (2021)

    work page 2021

  16. [16]

    In vivo dark-field radiography for early diagnosis and staging of pulmonary emphysema,

    K. Hellbach, A. Yaroshenko, F. G. Meinel, A. Ö. Yildirim, T. M. Conlon, M. Bech, M. Mueller, A. Velroyen, M. Notohamiprodjo, F. Bamberget al., “In vivo dark-field radiography for early diagnosis and staging of pulmonary emphysema,” Investig. radiology50, 430–435 (2015)

    work page 2015

  17. [17]

    Qualitativeandquantitativeassessmentofemphysemausingdark-fieldchestradiography,

    T. Urban, F. T. Gassert, M. Frank, K. Willer, W. Noichl, P. Buchberger, R. C. Schick, T. Koehler, J. H. Bodden, A. A. Fingerle et al., “Qualitativeandquantitativeassessmentofemphysemausingdark-fieldchestradiography,” Radiology 303, 119–127 (2022)

    work page 2022

  18. [18]

    Improved visualization of breast cancer features in multifocal carcinoma using phase-contrast and dark-field mammography: an ex vivo study,

    S. Grandl, K. Scherer, A. Sztrókay-Gaul, L. Birnbacher, K. Willer, M. Chabior, J. Herzen, D. Mayr, S. D. Auweter, F. Pfeifferet al., “Improved visualization of breast cancer features in multifocal carcinoma using phase-contrast and dark-field mammography: an ex vivo study,” Eur. radiology25, 3659–3668 (2015)

    work page 2015

  19. [19]

    Towards clinical grating-interferometry mammography,

    C. Arboleda, Z. Wang, K. Jefimovs, T. Koehler, U. Van Stevendaal, N. Kuhn, B. David, S. Prevrhal, K. Lång, S. Forte et al., “Towards clinical grating-interferometry mammography,” Eur. radiology30, 1419–1425 (2020)

    work page 2020

  20. [20]

    Defect detection in glass fabric reinforced thermoplastics by laboratory-based X-ray scattering,

    Ö. Öztürk, R. Brönnimann, and P. Modregger, “Defect detection in glass fabric reinforced thermoplastics by laboratory-based X-ray scattering,” Compos. Part B: Eng.252, 110502 (2023)

    work page 2023

  21. [21]

    Hard X-ray dark-field imaging with incoherent sample illumination,

    M. Endrizzi, P. C. Diemoz, T. P. Millard, J. Louise Jones, R. D. Speller, I. K. Robinson, and A. Olivo, “Hard X-ray dark-field imaging with incoherent sample illumination,” Appl. Phys. Lett.104(2014)

    work page 2014

  22. [22]

    Sub-pixel porosity revealed by x-ray scatter dark field imaging,

    V. Revol, I. Jerjen, C. Kottler, P. Schütz, R. Kaufmann, T. Lüthi, U. Sennhauser, U. Straumann, and C. Urban, “Sub-pixel porosity revealed by x-ray scatter dark field imaging,” J. Appl. Phys.110(2011)

    work page 2011

  23. [23]

    Quantitative single-exposure x-ray phase contrast imaging using a single attenuation grid,

    K. S. Morgan, D. M. Paganin, and K. K. W. Siu, “Quantitative single-exposure x-ray phase contrast imaging using a single attenuation grid,” Opt. Express19, 19781 (2011)

    work page 2011

  24. [24]

    X-ray multimodal imaging using a random-phase object,

    S. Berujon, H. Wang, and K. Sawhney, “X-ray multimodal imaging using a random-phase object,” Phys. Rev. A86, 063813 (2012)

    work page 2012

  25. [25]

    X-rayphase-contrast imaging and metrology through unified modulated pattern analysis,

    M.-C.Zdora,P.Thibault,T.Zhou,F.J.Koch,J.Romell,S.Sala,A.Last,C.Rau,andI.Zanette,“X-rayphase-contrast imaging and metrology through unified modulated pattern analysis,” Phys. review letters118, 203903 (2017)

    work page 2017

  26. [26]

    State of the art of x-ray speckle-based phase-contrast and dark-field imaging,

    M.-C. Zdora, “State of the art of x-ray speckle-based phase-contrast and dark-field imaging,” J. Imaging4, 60 (2018)

    work page 2018

  27. [27]

    Single-image geometric-flow x-ray speckle tracking,

    D. M. Paganin, H. Labriet, E. Brun, and S. Berujon, “Single-image geometric-flow x-ray speckle tracking,” Phys. Rev. A98, 053813 (2018)

    work page 2018

  28. [28]

    Single-ShotX-RaySpeckle-Based Imaging of a Single-Material Object,

    K.M.Pavlov,H.T.Li,D.M.Paganin,S.Berujon,H.Rougé-Labriet,andE.Brun,“Single-ShotX-RaySpeckle-Based Imaging of a Single-Material Object,” Phys. Rev. Appl.13, 054023 (2020)

    work page 2020

  29. [29]

    Dark-field tomography of an attenuating object using intrinsic x-ray speckle tracking,

    S. J. Alloo, D. M. Paganin, K. S. Morgan, M. J. Kitchen, A. W. Stevenson, S. C. Mayo, H. T. Li, B. M. Kennedy, A. Maksimenko, J. C. Bowdenet al., “Dark-field tomography of an attenuating object using intrinsic x-ray speckle tracking,” J. Med. Imaging9, 031502–031502 (2022)

    work page 2022

  30. [30]

    Fast implicit diffusive dark-field retrieval for single-exposure, single-mask x-ray imaging,

    M. A. Beltran, D. M. Paganin, M. K. Croughan, and K. S. Morgan, “Fast implicit diffusive dark-field retrieval for single-exposure, single-mask x-ray imaging,” Optica10, 422 (2023)

    work page 2023

  31. [31]

    Quantifying the x-ray dark-field signal in single-grid imaging,

    Y. Y. How and K. S. Morgan, “Quantifying the x-ray dark-field signal in single-grid imaging,” Opt. Express30, 10899 (2022)

    work page 2022

  32. [32]

    On the quantification of sample microstructure using single-exposure x-ray dark-field imaging via a single-grid setup,

    Y. Y. How, D. M. Paganin, and K. S. Morgan, “On the quantification of sample microstructure using single-exposure x-ray dark-field imaging via a single-grid setup,” Sci. Reports13, 11001 (2023)

    work page 2023

  33. [33]

    Multi-resolution X-ray phase-contrast and dark-field tomography of human cerebellum with near-field speckles,

    S. Savatović, M.-C. Zdora, F. De Marco, C. Bikis, M. Olbinado, A. Rack, B. Müller, P. Thibault, and I. Zanette, “Multi-resolution X-ray phase-contrast and dark-field tomography of human cerebellum with near-field speckles,” Biomed. Opt. Express15, 142 (2024)

    work page 2024

  34. [34]

    Tracking based, high-resolution single-shot multimodal x-ray imaging in the laboratory enabled by the sub-pixel resolution capabilities of the MÖNCH detector,

    E. S. Dreier, A. Bergamaschi, G. K. Kallon, R. Brönnimann, U. L. Olsen, A. Olivo, and M. Endrizzi, “Tracking based, high-resolution single-shot multimodal x-ray imaging in the laboratory enabled by the sub-pixel resolution capabilities of the MÖNCH detector,” Appl. Phys. Lett.117 (2020)

    work page 2020

  35. [35]

    Differential x-ray phase contrast imaging using a shearing interferometer,

    C. David, B. Nöhammer, H. H. Solak, and E. Ziegler, “Differential x-ray phase contrast imaging using a shearing interferometer,” Appl. Phys. Lett.81, 3287–3289 (2002)

    work page 2002

  36. [36]

    X-ray dark-field and phase-contrast imaging using a grating interferometer,

    F. Pfeiffer, M. Bech, O. Bunk, T. Donath, B. Henrich, P. Kraft, and C. David, “X-ray dark-field and phase-contrast imaging using a grating interferometer,” J. Appl. Phys.105(2009)

    work page 2009

  37. [37]

    X-ray phase and dark-field computed tomography without optical elements,

    T. A. Leatham, D. M. Paganin, and K. S. Morgan, “X-ray phase and dark-field computed tomography without optical elements,” Opt. Express32, 4588–4602 (2024)

    work page 2024

  38. [38]

    X-ray dark-field via spectral propagation-based imaging,

    J. N. Ahlers, K. M. Pavlov, M. J. Kitchen, and K. S. Morgan, “X-ray dark-field via spectral propagation-based imaging,” Optica11, 1182–1191 (2024)

    work page 2024

  39. [39]

    Directional x-ray dark-field imaging,

    T. H. Jensen, M. Bech, O. Bunk, T. Donath, C. David, R. Feidenhans, and F. Pfeiffer, “Directional x-ray dark-field imaging,” Phys. Med. & Biol.55, 3317 (2010)

    work page 2010

  40. [40]

    Directional dark-field retrieval with single-grid x-ray imaging,

    M. K. Croughan, Y. Y. How, A. Pennings, and K. S. Morgan, “Directional dark-field retrieval with single-grid x-ray imaging,” Opt. Express31, 11578–11597 (2023)

    work page 2023

  41. [41]

    X-rayscatteringtensortomographywitharandomwavefrontmodulatortostudy3Dmicrostructures in archaeological skeletal remains,

    G.Lautizi,S.A.Lemmers,V.DiTrapani,M.Schmeltz,M.-C.Zdora,L.Broche,A.Studer,F.Marone,M.Stampanoni, andP.Thibault,“X-rayscatteringtensortomographywitharandomwavefrontmodulatortostudy3Dmicrostructures in archaeological skeletal remains,” J. Instrum.20, C02028 (2025)

    work page 2025

  42. [42]

    X-ray directional dark-field imaging using unified modulated pattern analysis,

    R. Smith, F. De Marco, L. Broche, M.-C. Zdora, N. W. Phillips, R. Boardman, and P. Thibault, “X-ray directional dark-field imaging using unified modulated pattern analysis,” Plos one17, e0273315 (2022)

    work page 2022

  43. [43]

    Pushing the temporal resolution in absorption and Zernike phase contrast nanotomography: Enabling fast in situ experiments,

    S. Flenner, M. Storm, A. Kubec, E. Longo, F. Doring, D. M. Pelt, C. David, M. Muller, and I. Greving, “Pushing the temporal resolution in absorption and Zernike phase contrast nanotomography: Enabling fast in situ experiments,” J. Synchrotron Radiat.27, 1339–1346 (2020)

    work page 2020

  44. [44]

    Hard x-ray nanotomography at the P05 imaging beamline at PETRA III,

    S. Flenner, J. Hagemann, M. Storm, A. Kubec, P. Qi, C. David, E. Longo, S. Niese, P. Gawlitza, B. Zeller-Plumhoff, J. Reimers, M. Müller, and I. Greving, “Hard x-ray nanotomography at the P05 imaging beamline at PETRA III,” in Developments in X-Ray Tomography XIV,B. Müller and G. Wang, eds. (SPIE, 2022), November 2022, p. 19

    work page 2022

  45. [45]

    Beam-shaping condenser lenses for full-field transmission X-ray microscopy,

    K. Jefimovs, J. Vila-Comamala, M. Stampanoni, B. Kaulich, and C. David, “Beam-shaping condenser lenses for full-field transmission X-ray microscopy,” J. Synchrotron Radiat.15, 106–108 (2008)

    work page 2008

  46. [46]

    Halo suppression in full-field x-ray Zernike phase contrast microscopy,

    I. Vartiainen, R. Mokso, M. Stampanoni, and C. David, “Halo suppression in full-field x-ray Zernike phase contrast microscopy,” Opt. Lett.39, 1601 (2014)

    work page 2014

  47. [47]

    Dental enamel—a biological ceramic: regular substructuresinenamelhydroxyapatitecrystalsrevealedbyatomicforcemicroscopy,

    C. Robinson, S. Connell, J. Kirkham, R. Shore, and A. Smith, “Dental enamel—a biological ceramic: regular substructuresinenamelhydroxyapatitecrystalsrevealedbyatomicforcemicroscopy,”J.Mater.Chem. 14,2242–2248 (2004)

    work page 2004

  48. [48]

    Enamel Demineralization in Primary and Permanent Teeth,

    L. Wang, R. Tang, T. Bonstein, P. Bush, and G. Nancollas, “Enamel Demineralization in Primary and Permanent Teeth,” J. Dent. Res.85, 359–363 (2006)

    work page 2006

  49. [49]

    AQuantitativeAnalysisoftheNumericalDensityandtheDistributionalPatternofPrismsandAmeloblasts in Dental Enamel and Tooth Germs,

    G.Fosse,“AQuantitativeAnalysisoftheNumericalDensityandtheDistributionalPatternofPrismsandAmeloblasts in Dental Enamel and Tooth Germs,” Acta Odontol. Scand.26, 573–604 (1968)

    work page 1968

  50. [50]

    Small-angle X-ray scattering tensor tomography: model of the three-dimensional reciprocal- space map, reconstruction algorithm and angular sampling requirements,

    M. Liebi, M. Georgiadis, J. Kohlbrecher, M. Holler, J. Raabe, I. Usov, A. Menzel, P. Schneider, O. Bunk, and M. Guizar-Sicairos, “Small-angle X-ray scattering tensor tomography: model of the three-dimensional reciprocal- space map, reconstruction algorithm and angular sampling requirements,” Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A Found. Adv.74, 12–24 (2018)

    work page 2018

  51. [51]

    Investigating the missing-wedge problem in small-angle X-ray scattering tensor tomography across real and reciprocal space,

    L. C. Nielsen, T. Tänzer, I. Rodriguez-Fernandez, P. Erhart, and M. Liebi, “Investigating the missing-wedge problem in small-angle X-ray scattering tensor tomography across real and reciprocal space,” J. Synchrotron Radiat.31, 1327–1339 (2024)

    work page 2024

  52. [52]

    Universal reconstruction method for x-ray scattering tensor tomography based on wavefront modulation,

    G. Lautizi, A. Studer, M.-C. Zdora, F. De Marco, J. Kim, V. Di Trapani, F. Marone, P. Thibault, and M. Stampanoni, “Universal reconstruction method for x-ray scattering tensor tomography based on wavefront modulation,” Phys. Rev. Appl. 22, 024031 (2024)

    work page 2024

  53. [53]

    This allows to extract directly𝐷x and 𝐷y of equation 2 and 3

    Supplements As discussed in section 4, the direction-selective dark-field images can also be obtained directly by closing the C-AP once to a horizontal slit (scattering in x-direction) and once to a vertical slit (scattering in y-direction). This allows to extract directly𝐷x and 𝐷y of equation 2 and 3. The corresponding retrieved direction-selective dark-...

    work page