Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 116 references

JWST reveals cosmic ray dominated chemistry in the local ULIRG IRAS 07251$-$0248

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The nuclear gas of IRAS 07251−0248 is a cosmic-ray dominated region.

desk verdict First extragalactic mid-IR cation detections with a credible CRIR argument, but the central numbers need an X-ray ionization check before being treated as clean cosmic-ray rates. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.17390 v2 pith:HABAH6OO submitted 2025-06-20 astro-ph.GA

G. Speranza , M. Pereira-Santaella , M. Agúndez , E. González-Alfonso , I. García-Bernete , J. R. Goicoechea , M. Imanishi , D. Rigopoulou
show 2 more authors
M. G. Santa-Maria N. Thatte
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords cosmicrayionizationratemolecularcationsH3+HCO+N2H+ultraluminousinfraredgalaxyJWST/MIRIro-vibrationalabsorption
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper uses JWST/MIRI mid-infrared absorption bands of molecular cations—HCO+, HCNH+, and N2H+—together with H3+ from earlier NIRSpec data, to show that the nuclear interstellar medium of the ultraluminous infrared galaxy IRAS 07251−0248 is a cosmic-ray dominated region. The observed cation abundances require a cosmic-ray ionization rate per hydrogen nucleus of log($\zeta_{\mathrm{H}_2}/n_{\mathrm{H}}$ [cm$^3$ s$^{-1}$]) between about −19.1 and −18.2, roughly 100 to 1000 times the typical Galactic value. The paper also finds that the absorbing gas is moving toward us at 160 km/s and forms a warm expanding shell with a mass outflow rate of about 90–330 solar masses per year, possibly the inner base of the galaxy's larger cold molecular outflow. If correct, this establishes JWST mid-IR cation bands as a direct diagnostic of cosmic-ray driven chemistry in deeply obscured galaxies.

What carries the argument

The carrying object is the ratio $\zeta_{\mathrm{H}_2}/n_{\mathrm{H}}$ — the cosmic-ray ionization rate of H2 per hydrogen nucleus — which, in steady state, sets the fractional abundances of H3+, HCO+, N2H+, and related cations in a shielded dense cloud. The argument works by measuring those abundances from JWST/MIRI absorption bands (LTE column-density fits), excluding alternative excitation explanations via non-LTE radiative transfer with IR pumping, and then matching the measured abundances against a steady-state chemical model built on the UMIST network. H3+ is the pivotal species: its abundance is nearly a monotonic function of $\zeta_{\mathrm{H}_2}/n_{\mathrm{H}}$ and pins the rate, while HCO+ and N2H+, tracing denser gas, give a lower rate consistent with cosmic-ray attenuation.

What would settle it

Combine the observed column densities with a chemical model that includes X-ray ionization from the AGN (using its measured luminosity and column) and see whether the cation abundances can be reproduced without a cosmic-ray rate above the Galactic average. If X-rays alone suffice, the paper's CRIR claim collapses; if not, the claim survives. Alternatively, an independent gas-density measurement (e.g., from H2 rotational lines) combined with the H3+ abundance would test the ratio directly.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the molecular absorption bands in the eastern nucleus of IRAS 07251−0248 trace a warm (rotational temperatures 42–185 K) expanding shell, and that the high abundances of the molecular cations in this shell can only be explained if the gas is bathed in an intense cosmic-ray flux. LTE fits to the ro-vibrational bands yield column densities that, when divided by the independent H column density, give fractional abundances; comparing those with a steady-state chemical model of an obscured dense cloud yields log($\zeta_{\mathrm{H}_2}/n_{\mathrm{H}}$ [cm$^3$ s$^{-1}$]) ≈ −18.2 from H3+ and ≈ −19.1 from HCO+ and N2H+. The spread in rotational temperatures across the bands is accounted for by infrared radiative pumping in non-LTE models, so all bands can originate in the same region. The paper concludes that cosmic-ray dominated chemistry, initiated by H3+, governs the nuclear ISM of this ULIRG.

Load-bearing premise

The derived cosmic-ray ionization rates rest on the assumption that the absorbing gas is a single-phase, steady-state cloud at 200 K with solar abundances, shielded from UV, in which cosmic rays are the only ionizing agent; if the AGN's X-rays also contribute to the cation chemistry, the inferred rates would be upper limits, not the true rates.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The core of IRAS 07251−0248 is a cosmic-ray dominated region, implying that in deeply obscured ULIRG nuclei, cosmic rays rather than UV or X-ray photons drive the ion-molecule chemistry.
  • The warm 90–330 solar masses per year shell is probably the launching site of the larger, faster cold outflow, connecting nuclear cosmic-ray activity to galaxy-scale feedback.
  • Mid-IR absorption bands of HCO+, N2H+, and HCNH+ provide a new, extinction-robust way to measure cosmic-ray ionization rates in luminous obscured galaxies out to large distances.
  • The HCNH+/(HCN+HNC) ratio, being nearly independent of the absolute abundances, offers a useful CRIR tracer that is less affected by model uncertainties in elemental abundances.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the model omits AGN X-rays, the quoted rates are best read as upper limits; including X-ray ionization would likely lower the required cosmic-ray flux, so the true value could be lower than −18.2, though still plausibly above the Galactic average.
  • The offset between the H3+-based and HCO+/N2H+-based rates (−18.2 vs −19.1) may itself be a probe of the density gradient in the shell, offering an empirical constraint on how cosmic rays attenuate in dense molecular gas.
  • One could extend the same MIRI/MRS cation-band analysis to a sample of ULIRGs to test whether cosmic-ray dominated chemistry is a generic property of obscured merger nuclei, and to calibrate the ratio $\zeta_{\mathrm{H}_2}/n_{\mathrm{H}}$ against other CRIR diagnostics such as OH+ or H2O+ emission.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper presents JWST MIRI/MRS observations of the local ULIRG IRAS 07251−0248, detecting ro-vibrational absorption bands of HCO+, HCNH+, N2H+, HC3N, and HNC (plus HCN from a companion paper). LTE fits give rotational temperatures of 42–185 K and column densities; the bands are blueshifted by about 160 km/s, which is interpreted as an expanding warm shell with a mass outflow rate of roughly 90–330 Msun/yr. NLTE LVG models show that infrared radiative pumping can explain the spread in rotational temperatures. Chemical models with varying cosmic-ray ionization rate are compared with the observed abundances, yielding log(zeta_H2/n_H) of about −18.2 from H3+ and about −19.1 from HCO+ and N2H+, and the authors conclude that the nuclear ISM is a cosmic-ray dominated region.

Significance. If the result holds, this is the first extragalactic detection of several molecular cations in mid-infrared absorption and a novel method to constrain the cosmic-ray ionization rate in ULIRGs. The paper is careful in its spectroscopic analysis, with Monte Carlo error estimation for the LTE fits, and the NLTE pumping analysis is a strength. The blueshifted absorption and the physical interpretation as an outflow component are interesting. However, the central claim of cosmic-ray dominated chemistry rests on chemical models that omit X-ray ionization and on abundance inputs whose uncertainties are not propagated; the quantitative conclusion is therefore not yet established.

major comments (3)
  1. [3.2] The chemical model used to derive the CRIR (Sect. 3.2) includes cosmic-ray ionization but omits X-ray ionization, despite the high column density (N_H = 1.89e23 cm^-2) and the likely active nucleus in IRAS 07251. Hard X-rays suffer only moderate attenuation at this column and produce H3+, HCO+, and N2H+ via the same ion-molecule routes as cosmic rays. The paper provides no X-ray luminosity or attenuation calculation; without it, the reported log(zeta_H2/n_H) values are upper limits on the cosmic-ray term in a mixed ionization field, not established cosmic-ray ionization rates. The title and the conclusions that the chemistry is cosmic-ray dominated are therefore not supported by the present analysis.
  2. [3.2, footnote 1] The H3+ observed abundance intersects the model curves at two points, log(zeta_H2/n_H) approximately −18.2 and −17.5, with the latter lying near a bistability discontinuity. The authors discard the −17.5 solution on the basis of stability without a physical test such as a time-dependent calculation or an independent density constraint. Because the observed abundance alone does not uniquely determine the ionization rate, the quoted range −18.2 to −19.1 is degenerate; this ambiguity should be quantified and propagated into the uncertainty budget.
  3. [2 and Table 1] The fractional abundances used in the chemical-model comparison depend on the adopted hydrogen column density N_H = 1.89e23 cm^-2 from Pereira-Santaella et al. (2024b) and on the covering factor f = 0.7 for most bands from García-Bernete et al. (submitted). No uncertainties are propagated for these quantities, even though N/N_H is linearly proportional to each. A factor of two error in f or N_H would shift the inferred log(zeta_H2/n_H) by about 0.3 dex, which is comparable to the quoted difference between the H3+ and HCO+/N2H+ values. The authors should provide a sensitivity analysis or adopt conservative errors before the numerical CRIR values can be taken at face value.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract and throughout] The notation for the ratio log(zeta_H2/n_H [cm3 s^-1]) is typeset inconsistently, with missing superscripts and spaces; please define the notation once and use it uniformly.
  2. [3.2] The chemical model assumes A_V = 30 mag to suppress UV photons, but the adopted N_H of 1.89e23 cm^-2 corresponds to a much higher visual extinction under standard conversion relations; the choice of A_V = 30 should be justified.
  3. [Table 1] The HCN values are taken from García-Bernete et al. (submitted) without showing the fits; since these are key inputs for the HCN/HNC ratio and the cation abundances, consider including the fits in an appendix or reproducing the relevant line parameters.
  4. [4] The mass outflow rate range of 90–330 Msun/yr is computed using Eq. 11 of González-Alfonso et al. (2017) with a shell radius of 20–75 pc assumed without observational constraint; this assumption should be stated more explicitly when the number is quoted.
  5. [Appendix C, Figure C1] The label 'neff crit' in the right panel of Fig. C1 may be misrendered; ensure the subscript is typeset correctly.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the CRIR values are read off intersections between observed abundances and an independent chemical model; the self-citations are observational inputs, not fitted outputs.

full rationale

The central derivation chain is self-contained against external benchmarks. The paper measures molecular column densities and rotational temperatures from JWST/MIRI spectra using LTE fits, then compares the resulting fractional abundances with predictions of the Agúndez & Wakelam (2013) chemical model as a function of zeta_H2/nH. The cosmic-ray ionization rates are obtained by reading off the intersections of the observed abundance plateaus with the model curves (Fig. 2), not by fitting the model to the data or by defining the model in terms of the observed abundances. The H3+ abundance and NH used to normalize the columns come from Pereira-Santaella et al. (2024b), but these are observational measurements, and Appendix E explicitly compares the present chemical model with that paper's analytical formula rather than importing its zeta estimate. The use of Tkin = 200 K, A_V = 30 mag, solar abundances, and the UMIST network are stated assumptions of an independent forward model; they do not encode the target conclusion. The main scientific caveat, that X-ray ionization is not included and the single-zone model may not uniquely identify cosmic rays, is a modeling limitation affecting the strength of the astrophysical claim, not a circular reduction of the derivation to its own inputs. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no load-bearing argument reduces to a self-citation. Accordingly, the paper shows no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central CRIR inference rests on the chemical model's environmental assumptions and on adopted parameters from companion papers. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (5)
  • HNC v2 covering factor f = 0.14 ± 0.08
    Fit as a free parameter in the HNC band because a colder dust continuum dilutes the warm absorbed continuum; other bands use a fixed f=0.7 from García-Bernete et al. (submitted).
  • Intrinsic velocity dispersion sigma = 105 km s^-1
    Adopted from non-blended line widths in García-Bernete et al. (submitted); controls the line profile width in all LTE fits.
  • NLTE model radiative temperature Trad and gas density n_H2 = Trad 200 to 500 K; n_H2 = 10^4 cm^-3
    Fiducial values for the IR pumping demonstration in Section 3.1; chosen, not fitted, so the pumping explanation is a consistency check rather than a measurement.
  • Shell radius = 20 to 75 pc
    Assumed range used with equation 11 of González-Alfonso et al. (2017) to compute the mass outflow rate of 90 to 330 solar masses per year.
  • H2 formation rate Rf = 3 x 10^-17 cm^3 s^-1
    Assumed in the chemical model; Appendix E shows the choice shifts the H3+ abundance peak and thus affects the derived CRIR compared with the analytical model.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption LTE single-temperature homogeneous absorbing layer
    Used for all column density and Trot fits in Section 2; if the gas is not homogeneous or has a temperature gradient, the derived N and Trot change.
  • domain assumption NLTE/LVG formalism is valid for the pumping demonstration
    Section 3.1 and Appendix C; used to compute apparent Trot and effective critical densities.
  • domain assumption Chemical network completeness and steady-state abundances
    Section 3.2 uses the UMIST 2024 network and steady-state abundances; missing or uncertain reactions change the predicted abundance curves.
  • ad hoc to paper UV fully shielded with A_V=30 mag, X-ray ionization neglected
    Section 3.2; the paper does not model X-ray irradiation from the AGN, so the derived CRIR is an upper limit if X-rays contribute to ion production.
  • domain assumption Single constant density for all observed species
    Acknowledged in Section 3.2; the difference between the H3+ and HCO+/N2H+ zeta values is attributed to density stratification, but the model itself uses one density.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of JWST reveals cosmic ray dominated chemistry in the local ULIRG IRAS 07251$-$0248." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/HABAH6OO

@misc{pith2026250617390,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: JWST reveals cosmic ray dominated chemistry in the local ULIRG IRAS 07251$-$0248},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/HABAH6OO}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.17390}
}
abstract

We analyse the ro-vibrational absorption bands of various molecular cations (HCO$^+$, HCNH$^+$, and N$_2$H$^+$) and neutral species (HCN, HNC, and HC$_3$N) detected in the \textit{James Webb Space Telescope}/Mid-Infrared Instrument Medium Resolution Spectrometer spectrum (4.9--27.9\,$\upmu$m) of the local ultra luminous infrared galaxy IRAS~07251$-$0248. We find that the molecular absorptions are blueshifted by 160\,km\,s$^{-1}$ relative to the systemic velocity of the target. Using local thermal equilibrium (LTE) excitation models, we derive rotational temperatures ($T_{\rm rot}$) from 42 to 185\,K for these absorption bands. This range of measured $T_{\rm rot}$ can be explained by infrared (IR) radiative pumping as a by--product of the strength, effective critical density, and opacity of each molecular band. Thus, these results suggest that these absorptions originate in a warm expanding gas shell ($\dot{M}$$\sim$90--330\,$M_\odot$\,yr$^{-1}$), which might be the base of the larger scale cold molecular outflow detected in this source. Finally, the elevated abundance of molecular cations can be explained by a high cosmic ray ionization rate, with log($\zeta_{\text{H}_2}$/n$_{\rm H}\, [\text{cm}^3\, \text{s}^{-1}])$ in the range of $-$18.2 (from H$_3^+$) to $-$19.1 (inferred from HCO$^+$ and N$_2$H$^+$, which are likely tracing denser gas), consistent with a cosmic ray dominated chemistry as predicted by chemical models.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.17390 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. LTE models and continuum-normalized observed spectra of the fundamental ro-vibrational bands detected in absorption: from left to right and top to bottom HCO+ 𝑣2, HCNH+ 𝑣4, N2H + 𝑣2, HC3N 𝑣5, HCNH+ 𝑣5, and HNC 𝑣2. The observed spectra are shown in black, models are represented by pink line and shaded area. Vertical dashed purple lines indicate the wavelength of the resolved transitions of the P- and R-branches and t… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Predicted fractional abundances by chemical models as function of the 𝜁H2 /𝑛H2 ratio (solid curves) and observed values (horizontal dashed lines) with shaded area for the corresponding uncertainties. We assumed a H column density of 𝑁H = 1.89 × 1023cm−2 according to Pereira-Santaella et al. (2024b). H + 3 (black), HCN (orange), HNC (green), HCNH+ (pink) are presented in the left panel. Both observed abundances from … view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

116 extracted references · 47 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Ag \'u ndez M., Wakelam V., 2013, @doi [Chemical Reviews] 10.1021/cr4001176 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ChRv..113.8710A 113, 8710

    doi:10.1021/cr4001176 2013

  2. [2]

    Ag \'u ndez M., Roueff E., Le Petit F., Le Bourlot J., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201732518 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018A&A...616A..19A 616, A19

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201732518 2018

  3. [3]

    Ag \'u ndez M., Marcelino N., Cernicharo J., Roueff E., Tafalla M., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201935164 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...625A.147A 625, A147

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201935164 2019

  4. [4]

    S., Crofton M

    Altman R. S., Crofton M. W., Oka T., 1984, @doi [ ] 10.1063/1.447433 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1984JChPh..81.4255A 81, 4255

    work page doi:10.1063/1.447433 1984

  5. [5]

    Amano T., 1983, @doi [ ] 10.1063/1.446216 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1983JChPh..79.3595A 79, 3595

    work page doi:10.1063/1.446216 1983

  6. [6]

    Amano T., Hirao T., Takano J., 2005, @doi [J. Mol. Spectrosc.] 10.1016/j.jms.2005.09.004 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005JMoSp.234..170A 234, 170

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jms.2005.09.004 2005

  7. [7]

    Amano T., Hashimoto K., Hirao T., 2006, @doi [Journal of Molecular Structure] 10.1016/j.molstruc.2006.02.035 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006JMoSt.795..190A 795, 190

    work page doi:10.1016/j.molstruc.2006.02.035 2006

  8. [8]

    Argyriou I., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202346489 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...675A.111A 675, A111

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202346489 2023

Show all 116 references
  1. [9]

    Baba S., Nakagawa T., Isobe N., Shirahata M., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aa9f25 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...852...83B 852, 83

    2018 doi

  2. [10]

    Balan c a C., Scribano Y., Loreau J., Lique F., Feautrier N., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa1384 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.495.2524B 495, 2524

    2020 doi

  3. [11]

    J., Strange J

    Barber R. J., Strange J. K., Hill C., Polyansky O. L., Mellau G. C., Yurchenko S. N., Tennyson J., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stt2011 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.437.1828B 437, 1828

    2014 doi

  4. [12]

    A., Hartquist T

    Bayet E., Williams D. A., Hartquist T. W., Viti S., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18500.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011MNRAS.414.1583B 414, 1583

    2011

  5. [13]

    L., Brown R

    Blackman G. L., Brown R. D., Godfrey P. D., Gunn H. I., 1976, @doi [ ] 10.1038/261395a0 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1976Natur.261..395B 261, 395

    1976 doi

  6. [14]

    T., Lique F., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1063/5.0141851 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023JChPh.158g4304B 158, 074304

    Bop C. T., Lique F., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1063/5.0141851 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023JChPh.158g4304B 158, 074304

    2023 doi

  7. [15]

    Botschwina P., 1986, @doi [Chemical Physics Letters] 10.1016/0009-2614(86)85038-2 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1986CPL...124..382B 124, 382

    1986 doi

  8. [16]

    Bovino S., Ferrada-Chamorro S., Lupi A., Schleicher D. R. G., Caselli P., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnrasl/slaa048 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.495L...7B 495, L7

    2020 doi

  9. [17]

    D., Benz A

    Bruderer S., Doty S. D., Benz A. O., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0067-0049/183/2/179 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJS..183..179B 183, 179

    2009 doi

  10. [18]

    A., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad344b , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...966..166B 966, 166

    Buiten V. A., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad344b , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...966..166B 966, 166

    2024 doi

  11. [19]

    arXiv:2502.10271

    Buiten V., et al., 2025, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2502.10271 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025arXiv250210271B p. arXiv:2502.10271

    2025 doi arXiv

  12. [20]

    Bushouse H., et al., 2023, JWST Calibration Pipeline , @doi 10.5281/zenodo.8436689

    2023 doi

  13. [21]

    Cazzoli G., Cludi L., Buffa G., Puzzarini C., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0067-0049/203/1/11 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJS..203...11C 203, 11

    2012 doi

  14. [22]

    Ceccarelli C., Dominik C., L \'o pez-Sepulcre A., Kama M., Padovani M., Caux E., Caselli P., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/790/1/L1 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...790L...1C 790, L1

    2014 doi

  15. [23]

    B., Rothwell W

    Davies P. B., Rothwell W. J., 1984, @doi [ ] 10.1063/1.447688 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1984JChPh..81.5239D 81, 5239

    1984 doi

  16. [24]

    B., Rothwell W

    Davies P. B., Rothwell W. J., Hamilton P. A., 1984, @doi [ ] 10.1063/1.447889 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1984JChPh..81.1598D 81, 1598

    1984 doi

  17. [25]

    Denis-Alpizar O., Stoecklin T., Dutrey A., Guilloteau S., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa2308 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.497.4276D 497, 4276

    2020 doi

  18. [26]

    R., Garc \' a-Bernete I., Rigopoulou D., Pereira-Santaella M., Alonso-Herrero A., Roche P

    Donnan F. R., Garc \' a-Bernete I., Rigopoulou D., Pereira-Santaella M., Alonso-Herrero A., Roche P. F., Hern \'a n-Caballero A., Spoon H. W. W., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac3729 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.519.3691D 519, 3691

    2023 doi

  19. [27]

    R., Garc \' a-Bernete I., Rigopoulou D., Pereira-Santaella M., Roche P

    Donnan F. R., Garc \' a-Bernete I., Rigopoulou D., Pereira-Santaella M., Roche P. F., Alonso-Herrero A., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae612 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.529.1386D 529, 1386

    2024 doi

  20. [28]

    Dumouchel F., Faure A., Lique F., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16826.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010MNRAS.406.2488D 406, 2488

    2010

  21. [29]

    L., Muenter J

    Ebenstein W. L., Muenter J. S., 1984, @doi [ ] 10.1063/1.447269 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1984JChPh..80.3989E 80, 3989

    1984 doi

  22. [30]

    P., Schlemmer S., Schilke P., Stutzki J., M \"u ller H

    Endres C. P., Schlemmer S., Schilke P., Stutzki J., M \"u ller H. S. P., 2016, @doi [J. Mol. Spectrosc.] 10.1016/j.jms.2016.03.005 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016JMoSp.327...95E 327, 95

    2016 doi

  23. [31]

    Esposito F., Vallini L., Pozzi F., Casasola V., Mingozzi M., Vignali C., Gruppioni C., Salvestrini F., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac313 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.512..686E 512, 686

    2022 doi

  24. [32]

    Falstad N., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202039291 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021A&A...649A.105F 649, A105

    2021 doi

  25. [33]

    Faure A., Lique F., Wiesenfeld L., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw1156 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.460.2103F 460, 2103

    2016 doi

  26. [34]

    Fontani F., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201730527 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017A&A...605A..57F 605, A57

    2017 doi

  27. [35]

    C., McKellar A

    Foster S. C., McKellar A. R. W., 1984, @doi [ ] 10.1063/1.448066 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1984JChPh..81.3424F 81, 3424

    1984 doi

  28. [36]

    C., McKellar A

    Foster S. C., McKellar A. R. W., Sears T. J., 1984, @doi [ ] 10.1063/1.447344 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1984JChPh..81..578F 81, 578

    1984 doi

  29. [37]

    Fuente A., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201834654 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...624A.105F 624, A105

    2019 doi

  30. [38]

    Gaches B. A. L., Offner S. S. R., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aac94d , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...861...87G 861, 87

    2018 doi

  31. [39]

    Gaches B. A. L., Offner S. S. R., Bisbas T. G., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab20c7 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...878..105G 878, 105

    2019 doi

  32. [40]

    Garc \' a-Bernete I., Rigopoulou D., Aalto S., Spoon H. W. W., Hern \'a n-Caballero A., Efstathiou A., Roche P. F., K \"o nig S., 2022a, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202142749 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022A&A...663A..46G 663, A46

    doi

  33. [41]

    Garc \' a-Bernete I., et al., 2022b, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202244806 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022A&A...666L...5G 666, L5

    doi

  34. [42]

    Garc \' a-Bernete I., et al., 2024a, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202348266 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...681L...7G 681, L7

    doi

  35. [43]

    R., Thatte N., 2024b, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202348744 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...682L...5G 682, L5

    Garc \' a-Bernete I., Pereira-Santaella M., Gonz \'a lez-Alfonso E., Rigopoulou D., Efstathiou A., Donnan F. R., Thatte N., 2024b, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202348744 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...682L...5G 682, L5

    doi

  36. [44]

    Glasse A., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1086/682259 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015PASP..127..686G 127, 686

    2015 doi

  37. [45]

    Gonz \'a lez-Alfonso E., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201220466 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A&A...550A..25G 550, A25

    2013 doi

  38. [46]

    Gonz \'a lez-Alfonso E., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/800/1/69 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...800...69G 800, 69

    2015 doi

  39. [47]

    Gonz \'a lez-Alfonso E., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/836/1/11 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...836...11G 836, 11

    2017 doi

  40. [48]

    A., Fischer J., Donnan F

    Gonz \'a lez-Alfonso E., Garc \' a-Bernete I., Pereira-Santaella M., Neufeld D. A., Fischer J., Donnan F. R., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202348469 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...682A.182G 682, A182

    2024 doi

  41. [49]

    E., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1016/j.jqsrt.2021.107949 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022JQSRT.27707949G 277, 107949

    Gordon I. E., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1016/j.jqsrt.2021.107949 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022JQSRT.27707949G 277, 107949

    2022

  42. [50]

    M., Herbst E., \"O berg K

    Graninger D. M., Herbst E., \"O berg K. I., Vasyunin A. I., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/787/1/74 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...787...74G 787, 74

    2014 doi

  43. [51]

    Hansson A., Watson J. K. G., 2005, @doi [J. Mol. Spectrosc.] 10.1016/j.jms.2005.06.009 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005JMoSp.233..169H 233, 169

    2005 doi

  44. [52]

    Harada N., Herbst E., Wakelam V., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/721/2/1570 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...721.1570H 721, 1570

    2010 doi

  45. [53]

    Harada N., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/ad1937 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJS..271...38H 271, 38

    2024 doi

  46. [54]

    J., 1990, @doi [ ] 10.1063/1.459282 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1990JChPh..93.8446H 93, 8446

    Havenith M., Zwart E., Leo Meerts W., Ter Meulen J. J., 1990, @doi [ ] 10.1063/1.459282 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1990JChPh..93.8446H 93, 8446

    1990 doi

  47. [55]

    Heninger M., Lauvergnat D., Lemaire J., Boissel P., Mauclaire G., Marx R., 2003, @doi [International Journal of Mass Spectrometry] 10.1016/S1387-3806(02)00938-7 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003IJMSp.223..669H 223-224, 669

    2003 doi

  48. [56]

    Hern \'a ndez Vera M., Lique F., Dumouchel F., Hily-Blant P., Faure A., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx422 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.468.1084H 468, 1084

    2017 doi

  49. [57]

    Hirao T., Yu S., Amano T., 2008, @doi [J. Mol. Spectrosc.] 10.1016/j.jms.2007.11.014 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008JMoSp.248...26H 248, 26

    2008 doi

  50. [58]

    Hirota E., Endo Y., 1988, @doi [J. Mol. Spectrosc.] 10.1016/0022-2852(88)90139-7 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1988JMoSp.127..527H 127, 527

    1988 doi

  51. [59]

    Hirota T., Yamamoto S., Mikami H., Ohishi M., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1086/306032 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998ApJ...503..717H 503, 717

    1998 doi

  52. [60]

    E., Liu D.-J., Oka T., 1987, @doi [J

    Ho W.-C., Blom C. E., Liu D.-J., Oka T., 1987, @doi [J. Mol. Spectrosc.] 10.1016/0022-2852(87)90275-X , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1987JMoSp.123..251H 123, 251

    1987 doi

  53. [61]

    Holden L. R., Tadhunter C., Audibert A., Oosterloo T., Ramos Almeida C., Morganti R., Pereira-Santaella M., Lamperti I., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae810 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.530..446H 530, 446

    2024 doi

  54. [62]

    Hung C.-L., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/791/1/63 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...791...63H 791, 63

    2014 doi

  55. [63]

    Imanishi M., Nakanishi K., Izumi T., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/825/1/44 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...825...44I 825, 44

    2016 doi

  56. [64]

    Imanishi M., Baba S., Nakanishi K., Izumi T., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/acc388 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...950...75I 950, 75

    2023 doi

  57. [65]

    J., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202347050 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...676L..11J 676, L11

    Jim \'e nez-Donaire M. J., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202347050 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...676L..11J 676, L11

    2023 doi

  58. [66]

    Johnson R. D., ed. 2022, NIST Computational Chemistry Comparison and Benchmark Database NIST Standard Reference Database Number 101 , @doi 10.18434/T47C7Z

    2022 doi

  59. [67]

    R., Rehfuss B

    Kabbadj Y., Huet T. R., Rehfuss B. D., Gabrys C. M., Oka T., 1994, @doi [J. Mol. Spectrosc.] 10.1006/jmsp.1994.1016 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1994JMoSp.163..180K 163, 180

    1994

  60. [68]

    Kajita M., Kawaguchi K., Hirota E., 1988, @doi [J. Mol. Spectrosc.] 10.1016/0022-2852(88)90026-4 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1988JMoSp.127..275K 127, 275

    1988 doi

  61. [69]

    K \'a losi \'A ., Dohnal P., Shapko D., Rou c ka S ., Pla s il R., Johnsen R., Glos \' k J., 2017, @doi [Journal of Instrumentation] 10.1088/1748-0221/12/10/C10010 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017JInst..12C0010K 12, C10010

    2017 doi

  62. [70]

    Kawaguchi K., Yamada C., Saito S., Hirota E., 1985, @doi [ ] 10.1063/1.448407 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1985JChPh..82.1750K 82, 1750

    1985 doi

  63. [71]

    R., Polak M

    Keim E. R., Polak M. L., Owrutsky J. C., Coe J. V., Saykally R. J., 1990, @doi [ ] 10.1063/1.458845 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1990JChPh..93.3111K 93, 3111

    1990 doi

  64. [72]

    Labiano A., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202140614 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021A&A...656A..57L 656, A57

    2021 doi

  65. [73]

    Lahuis F., et al., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/512050 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJ...659..296L 659, 296

    2007 doi

  66. [74]

    Lamperti I., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202244054 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022A&A...668A..45L 668, A45

    2022 doi

  67. [75]

    J., Pearson J

    Lattanzi V., Walters A., Drouin B. J., Pearson J. C., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/517602 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJ...662..771L 662, 771

    2007 doi

  68. [76]

    Le Bourlot J., Pineau des Forets G., Roueff E., Schilke P., 1993, @doi [ ] 10.1086/187077 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1993ApJ...416L..87L 416, L87

    1993 doi

  69. [77]

    Liu D.-J., Lee S.-T., Oka T., 1988, @doi [J. Mol. Spectrosc.] 10.1016/0022-2852(88)90221-4 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1988JMoSp.128..236L 128, 236

    1988 doi

  70. [78]

    Martin J. M. L., Taylor P. R., Lee T. J., 1993, @doi [ ] 10.1063/1.465806 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1993JChPh..99..286M 99, 286

    1993 doi

  71. [79]

    S., Turner J

    Meier D. S., Turner J. L., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/755/2/104 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...755..104M 755, 104

    2012 doi

  72. [80]

    J., Walsh C., Van de Sande M., Markwick A

    Millar T. J., Walsh C., Van de Sande M., Markwick A. J., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202346908 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...682A.109M 682, A109

    2024 doi

  73. [81]

    Nakanaga T., Ito F., Sugawara K., Takeo H., Matsumura C., 1990, @doi [Chemical Physics Letters] 10.1016/0009-2614(90)85199-M , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1990CPL...169..269N 169, 269

    1990 doi

  74. [82]

    F., Kreynin P

    Neese C. F., Kreynin P. S., Oka T., 2013, @doi [J. Phys. Chem. A] 10.1021/jp312879f , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013JPCA..117.9899N 117, 9899

    2013 doi

  75. [83]

    A., Wolfire M

    Neufeld D. A., Wolfire M. G., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aa6d68 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...845..163N 845, 163

    2017 doi

  76. [84]

    K., Kishimoto N., Kubo Y., Nakasato N., 1997, @doi [ ] 10.1016/S0375-9474(97)00076-6 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1997NuPhA.616...79N 616, 79

    Nomoto K., Hashimoto M., Tsujimoto T., Thielemann F. K., Kishimoto N., Kubo Y., Nakasato N., 1997, @doi [ ] 10.1016/S0375-9474(97)00076-6 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1997NuPhA.616...79N 616, 79

    1997 doi

  77. [85]

    Oka T., 2013, @doi [Chemical Reviews] 10.1021/cr400266w , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ChRv..113.8738O 113, 8738

    2013 doi

  78. [86]

    Onishi S., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac1c6d , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...921..141O 921, 141

    2021 doi

  79. [87]

    Padovani M., Galli D., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201116853 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011A&A...530A.109P 530, A109

    2011 doi

  80. [88]

    E., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/200911794 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009A&A...501..619P 501, 619

    Padovani M., Galli D., Glassgold A. E., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/200911794 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009A&A...501..619P 501, 619

    2009 doi

  81. [89]

    Padovani M., Hennebelle P., Galli D., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201322407 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A&A...560A.114P 560, A114

    2013 doi

  82. [90]

    P., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/720/1/226 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...720..226P 720, 226

    Papadopoulos P. P., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/720/1/226 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...720..226P 720, 226

    2010 doi

  83. [91]

    Pereira-Santaella M., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202140955 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021A&A...651A..42P 651, A42

    2021 doi

  84. [92]

    Pereira-Santaella M., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202244725 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022A&A...665L..11P 665, L11

    2022 doi

  85. [93]

    Pereira-Santaella M., Gonz \'a lez-Alfonso E., Garc \' a-Bernete I., Garc \' a-Burillo S., Rigopoulou D., 2024a, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202347942 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...681A.117P 681, A117

    doi

  86. [94]

    Pereira-Santaella M., et al., 2024b, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202451741 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...689L..12P 689, L12

    doi

  87. [95]

    Pety J., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201629862 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017A&A...599A..98P 599, A98

    2017 doi

  88. [96]

    E., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202347997 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...686A.162P 686, A162

    Pineda J. E., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202347997 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...686A.162P 686, A162

    2024 doi

  89. [97]

    Podio L., Lefloch B., Ceccarelli C., Codella C., Bachiller R., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201322928 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014A&A...565A..64P 565, A64

    2014 doi

  90. [98]

    Redaelli E., Bovino S., Lupi A., Grassi T., Gaete-Espinoza D., Sabatini G., Caselli P., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202346413 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...685A..67R 685, A67

    2024 doi

  91. [99]

    Sabatini G., Bovino S., Redaelli E., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/acc940 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...947L..18S 947, L18

    2023 doi

  92. [100]

    G., Goicoechea J

    Santa-Maria M. G., Goicoechea J. R., Etxaluze M., Cernicharo J., Cuadrado S., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202040221 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021A&A...649A..32S 649, A32

    2021 doi

  93. [101]

    Sasada H., Amano T., 1990, @doi [ ] 10.1063/1.458017 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1990JChPh..92.2248S 92, 2248

    1990 doi

  94. [102]

    M., Pineau Des Forets G., Roueff E., Flower D

    Schilke P., Walmsley C. M., Pineau Des Forets G., Roueff E., Flower D. R., Guilloteau S., 1992, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1992A&A...256..595S 256, 595

    1992

  95. [103]

    J., 1985, @doi [J

    Sears T. J., 1985, @doi [J. Opt. Soc. Am. B] 10.1364/JOSAB.2.000786 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1985JOSAB...2..786S 2, 786

    1985 doi

  96. [104]

    L., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1086/680342 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015PASP..127..299S 127, 299

    Shirley Y. L., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1086/680342 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015PASP..127..299S 127, 299

    2015 doi

  97. [105]

    M., Hodges J

    Siller B. M., Hodges J. N., Perry A. J., McCall B. J., 2013, @doi [J. Phys. Chem. A] 10.1021/jp400570m , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013JPCA..11710034S 117, 10034

    2013 doi

  98. [106]

    Silva W. G. D. P., Bonah L., Schmid P. C., Schlemmer S., Asvany O., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1063/5.0185365 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024JChPh.160g1101S 160, 071101

    2024 doi

  99. [107]

    Socci A., Sabatini G., Padovani M., Bovino S., Hacar A., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202449960 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...687A..70S 687, A70

    2024 doi

  100. [108]

    Spoon H. W. W., et al., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1086/422813 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004ApJS..154..184S 154, 184

    2004 doi

  101. [109]

    Tanaka K., Kawaguchi K., Hirota E., 1986, @doi [J. Mol. Spectrosc.] 10.1016/0022-2852(86)90164-5 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1986JMoSp.117..408T 117, 408

    1986 doi

  102. [110]

    J., Meerts W

    Verhoeve P., Zwart E., Versluis M., Drabbels M., ter Meulen J. J., Meerts W. L., Dymanus A., McLay D. B., 1990, @doi [Rev. Sci. Instrum.] 10.1063/1.1141123 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1990RScI...61.1612V 61, 1612

    1990 doi

  103. [111]

    Wakelam V., et al., 2017, @doi [Molecular Astrophysics] 10.1016/j.molap.2017.11.001 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MolAs...9....1W 9, 1

    2017 doi

  104. [112]

    Wells M., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1086/682281 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015PASP..127..646W 127, 646

    2015 doi

  105. [113]

    M., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1016/j.jqsrt.2016.04.010 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017JQSRT.186..221W 186, 221

    Western C. M., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1016/j.jqsrt.2016.04.010 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017JQSRT.186..221W 186, 221

    2017 doi

  106. [114]

    Yamaguchi Y., Richards Jr. C. A., Schaefer III H. F., 1994, @doi [ ] 10.1063/1.468023 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1994JChPh.101.8945Y 101, 8945

    1994 doi

  107. [115]

    C., Drouin B

    Yu S., Pearson J. C., Drouin B. J., Crawford T., Daly A. M., Elliott B., Amano T., 2015, @doi [J. Mol. Spectrosc.] 10.1016/j.jms.2015.05.001 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015JMoSp.314...19Y 314, 19

    2015 doi

  108. [116]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION fin.entry write newline FUNCTION new.block output.state before.all = 'skip after.block 'output.state := if FUNCTION new.sentence output.state after.block = 'skip output.state before.all = 'skip after.sentence 'output.stat...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.