Single-Cell Proteomic Technologies: Tools in the quest for principles

Nikolai Slavov

arxiv: 2506.18198 · v1 · submitted 2025-06-22 · 🧬 q-bio.QM · q-bio.BM· q-bio.MN

Single-Cell Proteomic Technologies: Tools in the quest for principles

Nikolai Slavov This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 07:44 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧬 q-bio.QM q-bio.BMq-bio.MN

keywords single-cell proteomicsmass spectrometryprotein quantificationcellular heterogeneitybiophysical modelstechnological scalingfunctional protein measurementsmechanistic models

0 comments

The pith

Single-cell mass spectrometry has advanced to quantify thousands of proteins per cell with room to scale throughput and add functional measurements.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reviews how single-cell proteomic analysis by mass spectrometry moved from experimental uncertainty to reliable methods that accurately measure thousands of proteins in individual cells. It organizes the progress around tradeoffs and synergies among different technical approaches and presents a conceptual framework projecting further gains in speed and scope. The framework emphasizes extending these measurements beyond simple abundance to functional protein properties. If the projections hold, the resulting data could support mechanistic biophysical models of cellular behavior. Such models in turn offer a route to identifying new biological principles that bulk or population-averaged measurements have obscured.

Core claim

Over the last decade single-cell proteomic analysis by mass spectrometry transitioned from an uncertain possibility to a set of robust and rapidly advancing technologies supporting the accurate quantification of thousands of proteins, with considerable room both for throughput scaling and for extending the analysis scope to functional protein measurements to support the development of mechanistic biophysical models and help uncover new principles.

What carries the argument

The coherent conceptual framework that integrates tradeoffs and synergies across different single-cell mass-spectrometry technologies to guide scaling and functional extension.

If this is right

Larger numbers of single cells can be profiled per experiment, improving statistical power for detecting rare cell states.
Measurements can expand from protein abundance to functional properties, enabling direct tests of biophysical hypotheses.
Data sets generated this way can be used to construct and validate mechanistic models of cellular decision-making.
New principles of cellular organization may become visible once heterogeneity is resolved at the protein level across many cells.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Integrating these proteomic profiles with single-cell transcriptomic and metabolomic data could reveal how gene expression, protein levels, and metabolism are coordinated in the same cell.
The same scaling path may allow longitudinal tracking of protein changes in individual cells over time rather than snapshot measurements.
If functional measurements become routine, they could directly test whether certain protein states predict cell fate more reliably than transcript levels.

Load-bearing premise

Current single-cell proteomic methods can achieve substantial gains in throughput and functional measurements without encountering major technical barriers that would block support for mechanistic models.

What would settle it

A demonstration that protein coverage or quantification precision in single cells has reached a hard plateau that prevents both further throughput increases and addition of functional readouts such as post-translational modifications or activity states.

read the original abstract

Over the last decade, proteomic analysis of single cells by mass spectrometry transitioned from an uncertain possibility to a set of robust and rapidly advancing technologies supporting the accurate quantification of thousands of proteins. We review the major drivers of this progress, from establishing feasibility to powerful and increasingly scalable methods. We focus on the tradeoffs and synergies of different technological solutions within a coherent conceptual framework, which projects considerable room both for throughput scaling and for extending the analysis scope to functional protein measurements. We highlight the potential of these technologies to support the development of mechanistic biophysical models and help uncover new principles.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This review usefully frames single-cell MS proteomics progress and tradeoffs but its scaling and functional-extension projections stay qualitative without quantitative limits.

read the letter

Hi, the main point is that Slavov has written a clear review tracing how single-cell proteomics by mass spectrometry moved from early feasibility work to methods that now quantify thousands of proteins per cell, while sketching a framework for further gains. It organizes the drivers of that progress and highlights tradeoffs between sensitivity, throughput, and coverage in a way that could help people plan experiments aimed at mechanistic models. The conceptual structure around synergies is the part that stands out as actually useful for orienting readers in the subfield. The forward claims about considerable room for throughput scaling and for adding functional readouts such as PTMs or interactions rest on qualitative discussion of existing approaches rather than explicit scaling laws, sensitivity ceilings, or sample-prep bottlenecks. That leaves the optimism as an extrapolation, which matches the stress-test concern and makes the projection harder to falsify or build on directly. No new data or derivations appear, as expected for a review, and the citation pattern seems to draw on the relevant prior literature without obvious gaps in the abstract. This is the sort of paper that would help a systems biologist or quantitative cell biologist who needs a compact map of current options and open directions, but it would not serve someone looking for primary results or formal predictions. I would bring it to a reading group to discuss the tech tradeoffs. I would not cite it as a core reference in my own work in the next year. It deserves peer review because the synthesis is timely and the framing could be sharpened with referee comments on the quantitative side.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper reviews the decade-long transition of single-cell proteomic analysis by mass spectrometry from an uncertain possibility to robust technologies capable of accurately quantifying thousands of proteins. It examines major technological drivers, organizes solutions around tradeoffs and synergies within a coherent conceptual framework, and projects considerable room for throughput scaling as well as extension to functional protein measurements (activity, PTMs, interactions) to support mechanistic biophysical models and uncover new biological principles.

Significance. If the synthesis and projections hold, this review offers a useful organizing framework for the single-cell proteomics literature and could help researchers identify synergies between current methods and future functional readouts. The emphasis on conceptual tradeoffs rather than isolated technique descriptions is a constructive contribution for a field moving toward systems-level applications.

major comments (1)

Abstract and the projection paragraph: the assertion of 'considerable room' for both throughput scaling and extension to functional measurements without major technical barriers is presented as following from the reviewed tradeoffs and synergies, yet the manuscript does not supply or cite explicit scaling relations, sensitivity ceilings, or sample-preparation throughput limits that would allow a reader to evaluate whether the 'no major barriers' premise is falsifiable. This leaves the central forward-looking claim as qualitative extrapolation rather than a boundary-conditioned assessment.

minor comments (2)

The conceptual framework section would benefit from a small schematic or table that explicitly maps the reviewed technological axes (e.g., sensitivity vs. throughput, coverage vs. functional readout) to the claimed synergies; this would make the organizing narrative easier to follow for readers outside the immediate subfield.
Several recent method papers (2023–2025) on multiplexed single-cell MS are cited, but the reference list should be checked for completeness on parallel developments in sample-preparation miniaturization and ion-mobility enhancements that directly affect the scaling arguments.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our review and for the constructive comment on the forward-looking projections. We address the major comment below and will incorporate revisions to strengthen the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: Abstract and the projection paragraph: the assertion of 'considerable room' for both throughput scaling and extension to functional measurements without major technical barriers is presented as following from the reviewed tradeoffs and synergies, yet the manuscript does not supply or cite explicit scaling relations, sensitivity ceilings, or sample-preparation throughput limits that would allow a reader to evaluate whether the 'no major barriers' premise is falsifiable. This leaves the central forward-looking claim as qualitative extrapolation rather than a boundary-conditioned assessment.

Authors: We appreciate this observation and agree that greater specificity would make the projections more rigorous and falsifiable. The manuscript's conceptual framework is built around documented tradeoffs (e.g., between proteome coverage and throughput, or between sample input and sensitivity) and synergies (e.g., between improved ion optics, multiplexed labeling, and data-independent acquisition) that have already enabled order-of-magnitude gains in the past five years. These elements collectively indicate that further scaling is feasible without requiring new physical principles. Nevertheless, we acknowledge that the text does not explicitly cite quantitative scaling relations or sensitivity ceilings. In the revised version we will add a short paragraph (or expanded footnote) in the projection section that references existing literature on (i) ion-transmission and sample-loss limits in nano-flow LC-MS, (ii) demonstrated throughput ceilings in automated sample-preparation workflows, and (iii) sensitivity benchmarks from recent single-cell studies. This addition will allow readers to evaluate the 'considerable room' claim against concrete boundaries while preserving the review's emphasis on conceptual tradeoffs rather than new quantitative modeling. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: descriptive review without derivations or fitted predictions

full rationale

The paper is a qualitative review summarizing progress in single-cell mass spectrometry proteomics. It contains no equations, no fitted parameters, no quantitative predictions derived from data subsets, and no load-bearing self-citations that reduce the central claims to unverified inputs. The discussion of technological tradeoffs and future scaling potential is presented as expert synthesis of the literature rather than a formal derivation chain, rendering the analysis self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The review rests on domain assumptions about the feasibility and advancement of mass spectrometry-based single-cell proteomics, drawn from the existing literature it summarizes.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Single-cell proteomic analysis by mass spectrometry has transitioned from uncertain possibility to robust technologies capable of quantifying thousands of proteins.
Directly stated in the abstract as the basis for discussing further progress and potential.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5619 in / 1215 out tokens · 32495 ms · 2026-05-19T07:44:16.306870+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

We focus on the trade-offs and synergies of different technological solutions within a coherent conceptual framework, which projects considerable room both for throughput scaling and for extending the analysis scope to functional protein measurements.
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/RealityFromDistinction.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

Biophysical models explicitly represent direct molecular interactions... Single-cell proteomics helps bridge the two, by supplying the rich, mechanistically relevant data needed to inform and constrain biophysical models.

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

114 extracted references · 114 canonical work pages

[1]

S. R. Quake, A decade of molecular cell atlases. Trends Genet. 38 , 805–810 (2022)

work page 2022
[2]

Symmons, A

O. Symmons, A. Raj, What’s Luck Got to Do with It: Single Cells, Multiple Fates, and Biological Nondeterminism. Mol. Cell 62 , 788–802 (2016)

work page 2016
[3]

Y. Liu, A. Beyer, R. Aebersold, On the Dependency of Cellular Protein Levels on mRNA Abundance. Cell 165 , 535–550 (2016)

work page 2016
[4]

Franks, E

A. Franks, E. Airoldi, N. Slavov, Post-transcriptional regulation across human tissues. PLoS Comput. Biol. 13 , e1005535 (2017)

work page 2017
[5]

Khan, et al

S. Khan, et al. , Inferring post-transcriptional regulation within and across cell types in human testis. bioRxivorg 2024.10.08.617313 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.08.617313

work page doi:10.1101/2024.10.08.617313 2024
[6]

Buccitelli, M

C. Buccitelli, M. Selbach, mRNAs, proteins and the emerging principles of gene expression control. 21 , 630–644 (2020)

work page 2020
[7]

Leduc, S

A. Leduc, S. Zheng, P. Saxena, N. Slavov, Impact of protein degradation and cell growth on mammalian proteomes. bioRxivorg (2025)

work page 2025
[8]

McShane, M

E. McShane, M. Selbach, Physiological Functions of Intracellular Protein Degradation. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-cellbio-120420-091943

work page doi:10.1146/annurev-cellbio-120420-091943 2022
[9]

Slavov, Unpicking the proteome in single cells

N. Slavov, Unpicking the proteome in single cells. Science 367 , 512–513 (2020)

work page 2020
[10]

E. Levy, N. Slavov, Single cell protein analysis for systems biology. Essays Biochem. 62 , 595–605 (2018)

work page 2018
[11]

L. F. Vistain, S. Tay, Single-cell proteomics. Trends Biochem. Sci. 46 , 661–672 (2021)

work page 2021
[12]

M. J. MacCoss, et al. , Sampling the proteome by emerging single-molecule and mass spectrometry methods. Nat. Methods 20 , 339–346 (2023)

work page 2023
[13]

B. M. Floyd, E. M. Marcotte, Protein sequencing, one molecule at a time. Annu. Rev. Biophys. 51 , 181–200 (2022)

work page 2022
[14]

Xie, et al

X. Xie, et al. , Multicolumn nanoflow liquid chromatography with accelerated offline gradient generation for robust and sensitive single-cell proteome profiling. Anal. Chem. 96 , 10534–10542 (2024)

work page 2024
[15]

Leduc, L

A. Leduc, L. Khoury, J. Cantlon, S. Khan, N. Slavov, Massively parallel sample preparation for multiplexed single-cell proteomics using nPOP. Nat. Protoc. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41596-024-01033-8

work page doi:10.1038/s41596-024-01033-8 2024
[16]

Slavov, Driving Single Cell Proteomics Forward with Innovation

N. Slavov, Driving Single Cell Proteomics Forward with Innovation. J. Proteome Res. 20 , 4915–4918 (2021)

work page 2021
[17]

Slavov, Single-cell protein analysis by mass spectrometry

N. Slavov, Single-cell protein analysis by mass spectrometry. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 60 , 1–9 (2021). 22

work page 2021
[18]

S. S. Rubakhin, E. V. Romanova, P. Nemes, J. V. Sweedler, Profiling metabolites and peptides in single cells. Nat. Methods 8 , S20–9 (2011)

work page 2011
[19]

Marx, A dream of single-cell proteomics

V. Marx, A dream of single-cell proteomics. Nat. Methods 16 , 809–812 (2019)

work page 2019
[20]

Zhu, et al

Y. Zhu, et al. , Proteomic Analysis of Single Mammalian Cells Enabled by Microfluidic Nanodroplet Sample Preparation and Ultrasensitive NanoLC-MS. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed Engl. 57 , 12370–12374 (2018)

work page 2018
[21]

Li, et al

Z.-Y. Li, et al. , Nanoliter-Scale Oil-Air-Droplet Chip-Based Single Cell Proteomic Analysis. Anal. Chem. 90 , 5430–5438 (2018)

work page 2018
[22]

Specht, et al

H. Specht, et al. , Automated sample preparation for high-throughput single-cell proteomics. bioRxiv 399774 (2018)

work page 2018
[23]

Budnik, E

B. Budnik, E. Levy, N. Slavov, Mass-spectrometry of single mammalian cells quantifies proteome heterogeneity during cell differentiation. bioRxiv 102681 (2017)

work page 2017
[24]

Specht, et al

H. Specht, et al. , Single-cell mass-spectrometry quantifies the emergence of macrophage heterogeneity. bioRxiv (2019). https://doi.org/10.1101/665307

work page doi:10.1101/665307 2019
[25]

Specht, N

H. Specht, N. Slavov, Optimizing Accuracy and Depth of Protein Quantification in Experiments Using Isobaric Carriers. J. Proteome Res. 20 , 880–887 (2021)

work page 2021
[26]

Specht, et al

H. Specht, et al. , Single-cell proteomic and transcriptomic analysis of macrophage heterogeneity using SCoPE2. Genome Biol. 22 , 50 (2021)

work page 2021
[27]

E. M. Schoof, et al. , Quantitative single-cell proteomics as a tool to characterize cellular hierarchies. Nat. Commun. 12 , 3341 (2021)

work page 2021
[28]

Budnik, E

B. Budnik, E. Levy, G. Harmange, N. Slavov, SCoPE-MS: mass spectrometry of single mammalian cells quantifies proteome heterogeneity during cell differentiation. Genome Biol. 19 , 161 (2018)

work page 2018
[29]

R. T. Kelly, Single-cell Proteomics: Progress and Prospects. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 19 , 1739–1748 (2020)

work page 2020
[30]

Orsburn, The single cell proteomics revolution

B. Orsburn, The single cell proteomics revolution. Bioanalysis Zone (2020)

work page 2020
[31]

Ctortecka, K

C. Ctortecka, K. Mechtler, The rise of single-cell proteomics. Anal. Sci. Adv. 2 , 84–94 (2021)

work page 2021
[32]

Specht, N

H. Specht, N. Slavov, Transformative Opportunities for Single-Cell Proteomics. J. Proteome Res. 17 , 2565–2571 (2018)

work page 2018
[33]

H. I. Stewart, et al. , Parallelized acquisition of Orbitrap and Astral analyzers enables high-throughput quantitative analysis. Anal. Chem. 95 , 15656–15664 (2023)

work page 2023
[34]

Brunner, et al

A.-D. Brunner, et al. , Ultra-high sensitivity mass spectrometry quantifies single-cell proteome changes upon perturbation. Mol. Syst. Biol. 18 , e10798 (2022)

work page 2022
[35]

Ye, et al

Z. Ye, et al. , Enhanced sensitivity and scalability with a Chip-Tip workflow enables deep single-cell proteomics. Nat. Methods 22 , 499–509 (2025). 23

work page 2025
[36]

Montes, J

C. Montes, J. Zhang, T. M. Nolan, J. W. Walley, Single-cell proteomics differentiates Arabidopsis root cell types. New Phytol. 244 , 1750–1759 (2024)

work page 2024
[37]

L. K. Iwamoto-Stohl, et al. , Proteome asymmetry in mouse and human embryos before fate specification. bioRxivorg (2024)

work page 2024
[38]

S. Khan, R. Conover, A. R. Asthagiri, N. Slavov, Dynamics of single-cell protein covariation during epithelial-mesenchymal transition. J. Proteome Res. 24 , 1519–1527 (2025)

work page 2025
[39]

Singh, Towards resolving proteomes in single cells

A. Singh, Towards resolving proteomes in single cells. Nat. Methods 18 , 856 (2021)

work page 2021
[40]

R. G. Huffman, et al. , Prioritized mass spectrometry increases the depth, sensitivity and data completeness of single-cell proteomics. Nat. Methods 20 , 714–722 (2023)

work page 2023
[41]

Extending the sensitivity, consistency and depth of single-cell proteomics. Nat. Methods (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-023-01786-2

work page doi:10.1038/s41592-023-01786-2 2023
[42]

Slavov, Unlocking the potential of single-cell omics

N. Slavov, Unlocking the potential of single-cell omics. J. Proteome Res. 24 , 1481 (2025)

work page 2025
[43]

Petrova, A

B. Petrova, A. T. Guler, Recent developments in single-cell metabolomics by mass Spectrometry─A perspective. J. Proteome Res. 24 , 1493–1518 (2025)

work page 2025
[44]

Matsumoto, X

C. Matsumoto, X. Shao, M. Bogosavljevic, L. Chen, Y. Gao, Automated container-less cell processing method for single-cell proteomics. bioRxiv 2022.07.26.501646 (2022)

work page 2022
[45]

Ghatak, et al

S. Ghatak, et al. , Single-cell patch-Clamp/proteomics of human Alzheimer’s disease iPSC-derived excitatory neurons versus isogenic wild-type controls suggests novel causation and therapeutic targets. Adv. Sci. (Weinh.) 11 , e2400545 (2024)

work page 2024
[46]

Lombard-Banek, S

C. Lombard-Banek, S. A. Moody, M. C. Manzini, P. Nemes, Microsampling Capillary Electrophoresis Mass Spectrometry Enables Single-Cell Proteomics in Complex Tissues: Developing Cell Clones in Live Xenopus laevis and Zebrafish Embryos. Anal. Chem. 91 , 4797–4805 (2019)

work page 2019
[47]

A. A. Petelski, et al. , Multiplexed single-cell proteomics using SCoPE2. Nat. Protoc. 16 , 5398–5425 (2021)

work page 2021
[48]

Liang, et al

Y. Liang, et al. , Fully Automated Sample Processing and Analysis Workflow for Low-Input Proteome Profiling. Anal. Chem. 93 , 1658–1666 (2021)

work page 2021
[49]

Sanchez-Avila, et al

X. Sanchez-Avila, et al. , Easy and accessible workflow for label-free single-cell proteomics. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 34 , 2374–2380 (2023)

work page 2023
[50]

Matzinger, E

M. Matzinger, E. Müller, G. Dürnberger, P. Pichler, K. Mechtler, Robust and easy-to-use one-pot workflow for label-free single-cell proteomics. Anal. Chem. 95 , 4435–4445 (2023)

work page 2023
[51]

Zhu, et al

Y. Zhu, et al. , Nanodroplet processing platform for deep and quantitative proteome profiling of 10–100 mammalian cells. Nat. Commun. 9 , 1–10 (2018)

work page 2018
[52]

Woo, et al

J. Woo, et al. , High-throughput and high-efficiency sample preparation for single-cell proteomics using a nested nanowell chip. Nat. Commun. 12 , 6246 (2021)

work page 2021
[53]

Ctortecka, et al

C. Ctortecka, et al. , An automated nanowell-array workflow for quantitative multiplexed 24 single-cell proteomics sample preparation at high sensitivity. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 100665 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcpro.2023.100665

work page doi:10.1016/j.mcpro.2023.100665 2023
[54]

Leduc, R

A. Leduc, R. G. Huffman, J. Cantlon, S. Khan, N. Slavov, Exploring functional protein covariation across single cells using nPOP. Genome Biol. 23 , 261 (2022)

work page 2022
[55]

S. T. Gebreyesus, et al. , Streamlined single-cell proteomics by an integrated microfluidic chip and data-independent acquisition mass spectrometry. Nat. Commun. 13 , 37 (2022)

work page 2022
[56]

Yang, et al

Z. Yang, et al. , AM-DMF-SCP: Integrated single-cell proteomics analysis on an active matrix digital microfluidic chip. JACS Au 4 , 1811–1823 (2024)

work page 2024
[57]

Muneer, et al

G. Muneer, et al. , Mapping nanoscale-to-single-cell phosphoproteomic landscape by chip-DIA. Adv. Sci. (Weinh.) e2402421 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202402421

work page doi:10.1002/advs.202402421 2024
[58]

Gatto, et al

L. Gatto, et al. , Initial recommendations for performing, benchmarking and reporting single-cell proteomics experiments. Nat. Methods 20 , 375–386 (2023)

work page 2023
[59]

Onat, et al

B. Onat, et al. , Cell storage conditions impact single-cell proteomic landscapes. J. Proteome Res. 24 , 1586–1595 (2025)

work page 2025
[60]

I. Piga, C. Koenig, M. Lechner, P. Sabatier, J. V. Olsen, Formaldehyde fixation helps preserve the proteome state during single-cell proteomics sample processing and analysis. J. Proteome Res. 24 , 1624–1635 (2025)

work page 2025
[61]

Leduc, Y

A. Leduc, Y. Xu, G. Shipkovenska, Z. Dou, N. Slavov, Limiting the impact of protein leakage in single-cell proteomics. Nat. Commun. 16 , 4169 (2025)

work page 2025
[62]

Truong, R

T. Truong, R. T. Kelly, What’s new in single-cell proteomics. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 86 , 103077 (2024)

work page 2024
[63]

Greguš, J

M. Greguš, J. C. Kostas, S. Ray, S. E. Abbatiello, A. R. Ivanov, Improved sensitivity of ultralow flow LC-MS-based proteomic profiling of limited samples using monolithic capillary columns and FAIMS technology. Anal. Chem. 92 , 14702–14712 (2020)

work page 2020
[64]

Cong, et al

Y. Cong, et al. , Improved Single-Cell Proteome Coverage Using Narrow-Bore Packed NanoLC Columns and Ultrasensitive Mass Spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 92 , 2665–2671 (2020)

work page 2020
[65]

B. Shen, L. R. Pade, P. Nemes, Data-independent acquisition shortens the analytical window of single-cell proteomics to fifteen minutes in capillary electrophoresis mass spectrometry. J. Proteome Res. 24 , 1549–1559 (2025)

work page 2025
[66]

K. R. Johnson, Y. Gao, M. Greguš, A. R. Ivanov, On-capillary cell lysis enables top-down proteomic analysis of single mammalian cells by CE-MS/MS. Anal. Chem. 94 , 14358–14367 (2022)

work page 2022
[67]

K. A. Cupp-Sutton, M. Fang, S. Wu, Separation methods in single-cell proteomics: RPLC or CE? Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 481 , 116920 (2022)

work page 2022
[68]

K. G. I. Webber, et al. , Label-Free Profiling of up to 200 Single-Cell Proteomes per Day Using a Dual-Column Nanoflow Liquid Chromatography Platform. Anal. Chem. 94 , 6017–6025 (2022). 25

work page 2022
[69]

Derks, et al

J. Derks, et al. , Increasing mass spectrometry throughput using time-encoded sample multiplexing. bioRxiv 2025.05. 22.655515 (2025)

work page 2025
[70]

Sinitcyn, J

P. Sinitcyn, J. D. Rudolph, J. Cox, Computational Methods for Understanding Mass Spectrometry–Based Shotgun Proteomics Data. Annual Review of Biomedical Data Science (2018). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-biodatasci-080917-013516

work page doi:10.1146/annurev-biodatasci-080917-013516 2018
[71]

Derks, et al

J. Derks, et al. , Increasing the throughput of sensitive proteomics by plexDIA. Nat. Biotechnol. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-022-01389-w

work page doi:10.1038/s41587-022-01389-w 2022
[72]

Petrosius, et al

V. Petrosius, et al. , Exploration of cell state heterogeneity using single-cell proteomics through sensitivity-tailored data-independent acquisition. Nat. Commun. 14 , 5910 (2023)

work page 2023
[73]

Truong, et al

T. Truong, et al. , Data ‐ dependent acquisition with precursor coisolation improves proteome coverage and measurement throughput for label ‐ free single ‐ cell proteomics. Angew. Chem. Weinheim Bergstr. Ger. 135 (2023)

work page 2023
[74]

Wallmann, A

G. Wallmann, A. Leduc, N. Slavov, Data-Driven Optimization of DIA Mass Spectrometry by DO-MS. J. Proteome Res. 22 , 3149–3158 (2023)

work page 2023
[75]

Meier, et al

F. Meier, et al. , Parallel accumulation-serial fragmentation (PASEF): Multiplying sequencing speed and sensitivity by synchronized scans in a trapped ion mobility device. J. Proteome Res. 14 , 5378–5387 (2015)

work page 2015
[76]

Szyrwiel, L

L. Szyrwiel, L. Sinn, M. Ralser, V. Demichev, Slice-PASEF: fragmenting all ions for maximum sensitivity in proteomics. bioRxiv (2022)

work page 2022
[77]

Deng, et al

L. Deng, et al. , Enhancing sensitivity in low-load proteomics Orbitrap workflows via SLIM integration. Anal. Chem. (2025). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.5c00897

work page doi:10.1021/acs.analchem.5c00897 2025
[78]

J. A. Bubis, et al. , Challenging the Astral mass analyzer to quantify up to 5,300 proteins per single cell at unseen accuracy to uncover cellular heterogeneity. Nat. Methods 22 , 510–519 (2025)

work page 2025
[79]

Wichmann, et al

C. Wichmann, et al. , MaxQuant.Live enables global targeting of more than 25,000 peptides. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 18 , 982–994 (2019)

work page 2019
[80]

D. K. Schweppe, et al. , Full-Featured, Real-Time Database Searching Platform Enables Fast and Accurate Multiplexed Quantitative Proteomics. J. Proteome Res. 19 , 2026–2034 (2020)

work page 2026

Showing first 80 references.

[1] [1]

S. R. Quake, A decade of molecular cell atlases. Trends Genet. 38 , 805–810 (2022)

work page 2022

[2] [2]

Symmons, A

O. Symmons, A. Raj, What’s Luck Got to Do with It: Single Cells, Multiple Fates, and Biological Nondeterminism. Mol. Cell 62 , 788–802 (2016)

work page 2016

[3] [3]

Y. Liu, A. Beyer, R. Aebersold, On the Dependency of Cellular Protein Levels on mRNA Abundance. Cell 165 , 535–550 (2016)

work page 2016

[4] [4]

Franks, E

A. Franks, E. Airoldi, N. Slavov, Post-transcriptional regulation across human tissues. PLoS Comput. Biol. 13 , e1005535 (2017)

work page 2017

[5] [5]

Khan, et al

S. Khan, et al. , Inferring post-transcriptional regulation within and across cell types in human testis. bioRxivorg 2024.10.08.617313 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.08.617313

work page doi:10.1101/2024.10.08.617313 2024

[6] [6]

Buccitelli, M

C. Buccitelli, M. Selbach, mRNAs, proteins and the emerging principles of gene expression control. 21 , 630–644 (2020)

work page 2020

[7] [7]

Leduc, S

A. Leduc, S. Zheng, P. Saxena, N. Slavov, Impact of protein degradation and cell growth on mammalian proteomes. bioRxivorg (2025)

work page 2025

[8] [8]

McShane, M

E. McShane, M. Selbach, Physiological Functions of Intracellular Protein Degradation. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-cellbio-120420-091943

work page doi:10.1146/annurev-cellbio-120420-091943 2022

[9] [9]

Slavov, Unpicking the proteome in single cells

N. Slavov, Unpicking the proteome in single cells. Science 367 , 512–513 (2020)

work page 2020

[10] [10]

E. Levy, N. Slavov, Single cell protein analysis for systems biology. Essays Biochem. 62 , 595–605 (2018)

work page 2018

[11] [11]

L. F. Vistain, S. Tay, Single-cell proteomics. Trends Biochem. Sci. 46 , 661–672 (2021)

work page 2021

[12] [12]

M. J. MacCoss, et al. , Sampling the proteome by emerging single-molecule and mass spectrometry methods. Nat. Methods 20 , 339–346 (2023)

work page 2023

[13] [13]

B. M. Floyd, E. M. Marcotte, Protein sequencing, one molecule at a time. Annu. Rev. Biophys. 51 , 181–200 (2022)

work page 2022

[14] [14]

Xie, et al

X. Xie, et al. , Multicolumn nanoflow liquid chromatography with accelerated offline gradient generation for robust and sensitive single-cell proteome profiling. Anal. Chem. 96 , 10534–10542 (2024)

work page 2024

[15] [15]

Leduc, L

A. Leduc, L. Khoury, J. Cantlon, S. Khan, N. Slavov, Massively parallel sample preparation for multiplexed single-cell proteomics using nPOP. Nat. Protoc. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41596-024-01033-8

work page doi:10.1038/s41596-024-01033-8 2024

[16] [16]

Slavov, Driving Single Cell Proteomics Forward with Innovation

N. Slavov, Driving Single Cell Proteomics Forward with Innovation. J. Proteome Res. 20 , 4915–4918 (2021)

work page 2021

[17] [17]

Slavov, Single-cell protein analysis by mass spectrometry

N. Slavov, Single-cell protein analysis by mass spectrometry. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 60 , 1–9 (2021). 22

work page 2021

[18] [18]

S. S. Rubakhin, E. V. Romanova, P. Nemes, J. V. Sweedler, Profiling metabolites and peptides in single cells. Nat. Methods 8 , S20–9 (2011)

work page 2011

[19] [19]

Marx, A dream of single-cell proteomics

V. Marx, A dream of single-cell proteomics. Nat. Methods 16 , 809–812 (2019)

work page 2019

[20] [20]

Zhu, et al

Y. Zhu, et al. , Proteomic Analysis of Single Mammalian Cells Enabled by Microfluidic Nanodroplet Sample Preparation and Ultrasensitive NanoLC-MS. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed Engl. 57 , 12370–12374 (2018)

work page 2018

[21] [21]

Li, et al

Z.-Y. Li, et al. , Nanoliter-Scale Oil-Air-Droplet Chip-Based Single Cell Proteomic Analysis. Anal. Chem. 90 , 5430–5438 (2018)

work page 2018

[22] [22]

Specht, et al

H. Specht, et al. , Automated sample preparation for high-throughput single-cell proteomics. bioRxiv 399774 (2018)

work page 2018

[23] [23]

Budnik, E

B. Budnik, E. Levy, N. Slavov, Mass-spectrometry of single mammalian cells quantifies proteome heterogeneity during cell differentiation. bioRxiv 102681 (2017)

work page 2017

[24] [24]

Specht, et al

H. Specht, et al. , Single-cell mass-spectrometry quantifies the emergence of macrophage heterogeneity. bioRxiv (2019). https://doi.org/10.1101/665307

work page doi:10.1101/665307 2019

[25] [25]

Specht, N

H. Specht, N. Slavov, Optimizing Accuracy and Depth of Protein Quantification in Experiments Using Isobaric Carriers. J. Proteome Res. 20 , 880–887 (2021)

work page 2021

[26] [26]

Specht, et al

H. Specht, et al. , Single-cell proteomic and transcriptomic analysis of macrophage heterogeneity using SCoPE2. Genome Biol. 22 , 50 (2021)

work page 2021

[27] [27]

E. M. Schoof, et al. , Quantitative single-cell proteomics as a tool to characterize cellular hierarchies. Nat. Commun. 12 , 3341 (2021)

work page 2021

[28] [28]

Budnik, E

B. Budnik, E. Levy, G. Harmange, N. Slavov, SCoPE-MS: mass spectrometry of single mammalian cells quantifies proteome heterogeneity during cell differentiation. Genome Biol. 19 , 161 (2018)

work page 2018

[29] [29]

R. T. Kelly, Single-cell Proteomics: Progress and Prospects. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 19 , 1739–1748 (2020)

work page 2020

[30] [30]

Orsburn, The single cell proteomics revolution

B. Orsburn, The single cell proteomics revolution. Bioanalysis Zone (2020)

work page 2020

[31] [31]

Ctortecka, K

C. Ctortecka, K. Mechtler, The rise of single-cell proteomics. Anal. Sci. Adv. 2 , 84–94 (2021)

work page 2021

[32] [32]

Specht, N

H. Specht, N. Slavov, Transformative Opportunities for Single-Cell Proteomics. J. Proteome Res. 17 , 2565–2571 (2018)

work page 2018

[33] [33]

H. I. Stewart, et al. , Parallelized acquisition of Orbitrap and Astral analyzers enables high-throughput quantitative analysis. Anal. Chem. 95 , 15656–15664 (2023)

work page 2023

[34] [34]

Brunner, et al

A.-D. Brunner, et al. , Ultra-high sensitivity mass spectrometry quantifies single-cell proteome changes upon perturbation. Mol. Syst. Biol. 18 , e10798 (2022)

work page 2022

[35] [35]

Ye, et al

Z. Ye, et al. , Enhanced sensitivity and scalability with a Chip-Tip workflow enables deep single-cell proteomics. Nat. Methods 22 , 499–509 (2025). 23

work page 2025

[36] [36]

Montes, J

C. Montes, J. Zhang, T. M. Nolan, J. W. Walley, Single-cell proteomics differentiates Arabidopsis root cell types. New Phytol. 244 , 1750–1759 (2024)

work page 2024

[37] [37]

L. K. Iwamoto-Stohl, et al. , Proteome asymmetry in mouse and human embryos before fate specification. bioRxivorg (2024)

work page 2024

[38] [38]

S. Khan, R. Conover, A. R. Asthagiri, N. Slavov, Dynamics of single-cell protein covariation during epithelial-mesenchymal transition. J. Proteome Res. 24 , 1519–1527 (2025)

work page 2025

[39] [39]

Singh, Towards resolving proteomes in single cells

A. Singh, Towards resolving proteomes in single cells. Nat. Methods 18 , 856 (2021)

work page 2021

[40] [40]

R. G. Huffman, et al. , Prioritized mass spectrometry increases the depth, sensitivity and data completeness of single-cell proteomics. Nat. Methods 20 , 714–722 (2023)

work page 2023

[41] [41]

Extending the sensitivity, consistency and depth of single-cell proteomics. Nat. Methods (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-023-01786-2

work page doi:10.1038/s41592-023-01786-2 2023

[42] [42]

Slavov, Unlocking the potential of single-cell omics

N. Slavov, Unlocking the potential of single-cell omics. J. Proteome Res. 24 , 1481 (2025)

work page 2025

[43] [43]

Petrova, A

B. Petrova, A. T. Guler, Recent developments in single-cell metabolomics by mass Spectrometry─A perspective. J. Proteome Res. 24 , 1493–1518 (2025)

work page 2025

[44] [44]

Matsumoto, X

C. Matsumoto, X. Shao, M. Bogosavljevic, L. Chen, Y. Gao, Automated container-less cell processing method for single-cell proteomics. bioRxiv 2022.07.26.501646 (2022)

work page 2022

[45] [45]

Ghatak, et al

S. Ghatak, et al. , Single-cell patch-Clamp/proteomics of human Alzheimer’s disease iPSC-derived excitatory neurons versus isogenic wild-type controls suggests novel causation and therapeutic targets. Adv. Sci. (Weinh.) 11 , e2400545 (2024)

work page 2024

[46] [46]

Lombard-Banek, S

C. Lombard-Banek, S. A. Moody, M. C. Manzini, P. Nemes, Microsampling Capillary Electrophoresis Mass Spectrometry Enables Single-Cell Proteomics in Complex Tissues: Developing Cell Clones in Live Xenopus laevis and Zebrafish Embryos. Anal. Chem. 91 , 4797–4805 (2019)

work page 2019

[47] [47]

A. A. Petelski, et al. , Multiplexed single-cell proteomics using SCoPE2. Nat. Protoc. 16 , 5398–5425 (2021)

work page 2021

[48] [48]

Liang, et al

Y. Liang, et al. , Fully Automated Sample Processing and Analysis Workflow for Low-Input Proteome Profiling. Anal. Chem. 93 , 1658–1666 (2021)

work page 2021

[49] [49]

Sanchez-Avila, et al

X. Sanchez-Avila, et al. , Easy and accessible workflow for label-free single-cell proteomics. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 34 , 2374–2380 (2023)

work page 2023

[50] [50]

Matzinger, E

M. Matzinger, E. Müller, G. Dürnberger, P. Pichler, K. Mechtler, Robust and easy-to-use one-pot workflow for label-free single-cell proteomics. Anal. Chem. 95 , 4435–4445 (2023)

work page 2023

[51] [51]

Zhu, et al

Y. Zhu, et al. , Nanodroplet processing platform for deep and quantitative proteome profiling of 10–100 mammalian cells. Nat. Commun. 9 , 1–10 (2018)

work page 2018

[52] [52]

Woo, et al

J. Woo, et al. , High-throughput and high-efficiency sample preparation for single-cell proteomics using a nested nanowell chip. Nat. Commun. 12 , 6246 (2021)

work page 2021

[53] [53]

Ctortecka, et al

C. Ctortecka, et al. , An automated nanowell-array workflow for quantitative multiplexed 24 single-cell proteomics sample preparation at high sensitivity. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 100665 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcpro.2023.100665

work page doi:10.1016/j.mcpro.2023.100665 2023

[54] [54]

Leduc, R

A. Leduc, R. G. Huffman, J. Cantlon, S. Khan, N. Slavov, Exploring functional protein covariation across single cells using nPOP. Genome Biol. 23 , 261 (2022)

work page 2022

[55] [55]

S. T. Gebreyesus, et al. , Streamlined single-cell proteomics by an integrated microfluidic chip and data-independent acquisition mass spectrometry. Nat. Commun. 13 , 37 (2022)

work page 2022

[56] [56]

Yang, et al

Z. Yang, et al. , AM-DMF-SCP: Integrated single-cell proteomics analysis on an active matrix digital microfluidic chip. JACS Au 4 , 1811–1823 (2024)

work page 2024

[57] [57]

Muneer, et al

G. Muneer, et al. , Mapping nanoscale-to-single-cell phosphoproteomic landscape by chip-DIA. Adv. Sci. (Weinh.) e2402421 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202402421

work page doi:10.1002/advs.202402421 2024

[58] [58]

Gatto, et al

L. Gatto, et al. , Initial recommendations for performing, benchmarking and reporting single-cell proteomics experiments. Nat. Methods 20 , 375–386 (2023)

work page 2023

[59] [59]

Onat, et al

B. Onat, et al. , Cell storage conditions impact single-cell proteomic landscapes. J. Proteome Res. 24 , 1586–1595 (2025)

work page 2025

[60] [60]

I. Piga, C. Koenig, M. Lechner, P. Sabatier, J. V. Olsen, Formaldehyde fixation helps preserve the proteome state during single-cell proteomics sample processing and analysis. J. Proteome Res. 24 , 1624–1635 (2025)

work page 2025

[61] [61]

Leduc, Y

A. Leduc, Y. Xu, G. Shipkovenska, Z. Dou, N. Slavov, Limiting the impact of protein leakage in single-cell proteomics. Nat. Commun. 16 , 4169 (2025)

work page 2025

[62] [62]

Truong, R

T. Truong, R. T. Kelly, What’s new in single-cell proteomics. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 86 , 103077 (2024)

work page 2024

[63] [63]

Greguš, J

M. Greguš, J. C. Kostas, S. Ray, S. E. Abbatiello, A. R. Ivanov, Improved sensitivity of ultralow flow LC-MS-based proteomic profiling of limited samples using monolithic capillary columns and FAIMS technology. Anal. Chem. 92 , 14702–14712 (2020)

work page 2020

[64] [64]

Cong, et al

Y. Cong, et al. , Improved Single-Cell Proteome Coverage Using Narrow-Bore Packed NanoLC Columns and Ultrasensitive Mass Spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 92 , 2665–2671 (2020)

work page 2020

[65] [65]

B. Shen, L. R. Pade, P. Nemes, Data-independent acquisition shortens the analytical window of single-cell proteomics to fifteen minutes in capillary electrophoresis mass spectrometry. J. Proteome Res. 24 , 1549–1559 (2025)

work page 2025

[66] [66]

K. R. Johnson, Y. Gao, M. Greguš, A. R. Ivanov, On-capillary cell lysis enables top-down proteomic analysis of single mammalian cells by CE-MS/MS. Anal. Chem. 94 , 14358–14367 (2022)

work page 2022

[67] [67]

K. A. Cupp-Sutton, M. Fang, S. Wu, Separation methods in single-cell proteomics: RPLC or CE? Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 481 , 116920 (2022)

work page 2022

[68] [68]

K. G. I. Webber, et al. , Label-Free Profiling of up to 200 Single-Cell Proteomes per Day Using a Dual-Column Nanoflow Liquid Chromatography Platform. Anal. Chem. 94 , 6017–6025 (2022). 25

work page 2022

[69] [69]

Derks, et al

J. Derks, et al. , Increasing mass spectrometry throughput using time-encoded sample multiplexing. bioRxiv 2025.05. 22.655515 (2025)

work page 2025

[70] [70]

Sinitcyn, J

P. Sinitcyn, J. D. Rudolph, J. Cox, Computational Methods for Understanding Mass Spectrometry–Based Shotgun Proteomics Data. Annual Review of Biomedical Data Science (2018). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-biodatasci-080917-013516

work page doi:10.1146/annurev-biodatasci-080917-013516 2018

[71] [71]

Derks, et al

J. Derks, et al. , Increasing the throughput of sensitive proteomics by plexDIA. Nat. Biotechnol. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-022-01389-w

work page doi:10.1038/s41587-022-01389-w 2022

[72] [72]

Petrosius, et al

V. Petrosius, et al. , Exploration of cell state heterogeneity using single-cell proteomics through sensitivity-tailored data-independent acquisition. Nat. Commun. 14 , 5910 (2023)

work page 2023

[73] [73]

Truong, et al

T. Truong, et al. , Data ‐ dependent acquisition with precursor coisolation improves proteome coverage and measurement throughput for label ‐ free single ‐ cell proteomics. Angew. Chem. Weinheim Bergstr. Ger. 135 (2023)

work page 2023

[74] [74]

Wallmann, A

G. Wallmann, A. Leduc, N. Slavov, Data-Driven Optimization of DIA Mass Spectrometry by DO-MS. J. Proteome Res. 22 , 3149–3158 (2023)

work page 2023

[75] [75]

Meier, et al

F. Meier, et al. , Parallel accumulation-serial fragmentation (PASEF): Multiplying sequencing speed and sensitivity by synchronized scans in a trapped ion mobility device. J. Proteome Res. 14 , 5378–5387 (2015)

work page 2015

[76] [76]

Szyrwiel, L

L. Szyrwiel, L. Sinn, M. Ralser, V. Demichev, Slice-PASEF: fragmenting all ions for maximum sensitivity in proteomics. bioRxiv (2022)

work page 2022

[77] [77]

Deng, et al

L. Deng, et al. , Enhancing sensitivity in low-load proteomics Orbitrap workflows via SLIM integration. Anal. Chem. (2025). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.5c00897

work page doi:10.1021/acs.analchem.5c00897 2025

[78] [78]

J. A. Bubis, et al. , Challenging the Astral mass analyzer to quantify up to 5,300 proteins per single cell at unseen accuracy to uncover cellular heterogeneity. Nat. Methods 22 , 510–519 (2025)

work page 2025

[79] [79]

Wichmann, et al

C. Wichmann, et al. , MaxQuant.Live enables global targeting of more than 25,000 peptides. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 18 , 982–994 (2019)

work page 2019

[80] [80]

D. K. Schweppe, et al. , Full-Featured, Real-Time Database Searching Platform Enables Fast and Accurate Multiplexed Quantitative Proteomics. J. Proteome Res. 19 , 2026–2034 (2020)

work page 2026