Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 94 references

Influence of Interlayer Stacking on Optical Behavior in WSe$_{2}$/MoS$_{2}$ van der Waals Heterostructures

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Stacking order decides which excitons WSe2/MoS2 bilayers host, including whether a 3D interlayer exciton can form.

desk verdict Solid GW/BSE stacking comparison with a plausible but under-supported 3D-exciton claim; needs convergence tests and a real symmetry analysis before the central result is accepted. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.18607 v1 pith:BNTR7OUE submitted 2025-06-23 cond-mat.str-el

Widad Louafi , Karim Rezouali , Daniele Varsano , Maurizia Palummo , Maurits W. Haverkort , Samir Lounis This is my paper
classification cond-mat.str-el
keywords WSe2/MoS2heterobilayervanderWaalsstackingexcitondimensionalitycharge-transfer3DinterlayerBethe-SalpeterequationG0W0moiréstackings
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper asks whether the in-plane alignment of two atomically thin semiconductors, WSe2 and MoS2, can change how light is absorbed and what kinds of bound electron-hole pairs, known as excitons, form. It tries to establish that stacking registry is a decisive control: in the eclipsed AA and one staggered (AB_Se) arrangement, the bilayer hosts two-dimensional intralayer excitons, charge-transfer excitons, and a delocalized three-dimensional exciton whose electron spreads over both layers, while the other staggered arrangement (AB_W) supports only the first two types. This matters because if stacking can switch the dimensionality and optical activity of excitons, then layer orientation becomes a design parameter for optoelectronic and photovoltaic devices based on van der Waals heterostructures.

What carries the argument

The mechanism that carries the argument is the registry-dependent interlayer hybridization of metal d orbitals, specifically the Mo-d and W-d states that form the CB+4 conduction band (the fifth conduction band at the K point), together with symmetry-imposed optical selection rules. The central objects are the three R-type stacking configurations (AA, AB_W, AB_Se) that are local energy minima of the moiré pattern; AA is eclipsed, while the two AB variants differ by which metal atom sits under a chalcogen atom of the opposite layer. The paper uses first-principles DFT, G0W0 quasiparticle corrections, and Bethe-Salpeter equation calculations to show that when CB+4 has strong out-of-plane d-orbital hybridization, the resulting exciton is delocalized across both layers (3D), and when registry forbids that hybridization, the 3D exciton is absent.

What would settle it

Recompute the optical spectrum and exciton wave functions of the AB_W-stacked WSe2/MoS2 bilayer with more than six conduction bands in the Bethe-Salpeter equation and a GW self-energy with more empty states; if a bright exciton with electron density spread over both layers appears in AB_W near the predicted 3D-exciton energy, the central claim would be refuted.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the nature and dimensionality of excitons in a WSe2/MoS2 heterobilayer are controlled by interlayer stacking symmetry. In AA and AB_Se stackings, transitions from the valence band to the CB+4 conduction states near the K point produce a degenerate, bright 3D exciton: the hole remains in the WSe2 layer while the electron density extends across both layers because the Mo-d and W-d orbitals hybridize strongly. In AB_W, where W and S atoms sit on hollow sites, this hybridization is absent, the CB+4 states are too localized or moved out of the relevant energy window, and the 3D exciton does not appear; only 2D intralayer and charge-transfer excitons form. The paper attributes this difference to the interplay of symmetry constraints, interlayer hybridization, and orbital-specific selection rules.

Load-bearing premise

The classification depends on the G0W0 quasiparticle calculation, which uses the generalized plasmon-pole model and only six conduction bands in the exciton basis, placing the CB+4 states correctly with the right orbital character; if those states are mispositioned or a larger basis changes the exciton manifold, the claimed absence of 3D excitons in AB_W could disappear or reappear.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Stacking order becomes a practical design parameter: fabricating AA or AB_Se regions of a WSe2/MoS2 bilayer gives access to a delocalized 3D interlayer exciton that is absent in AB_W.
  • In moiré superlattices, the optical response will vary from region to region because the three local stackings host different exciton manifolds, so spectra probe a mix of 2D, charge-transfer, and 3D excitons.
  • AA stacking, with its direct 2.40 eV quasiparticle gap at K, is the most promising light-emitting registry among the three, while AB stackings remain near-direct-gap emitters.
  • Charge-transfer excitons appear in all three stackings, so interlayer electron-hole separation is robust to stacking choice, which is relevant for photovoltaic charge separation.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the six-conduction-band truncation of the exciton basis is relaxed, the most informative check is whether a bright delocalized interlayer exciton reappears in AB_W at higher energy; this is a computational test the paper's basis choice leaves open.
  • The same registry-versus-hybridization logic could plausibly extend to other TMD heterobilayers such as MoSe2/WS2, where the relative d-orbital alignment at the interface may similarly gate the existence of 3D excitons.
  • Spatially resolved optical measurements on moiré supercells should see contrasting exciton manifolds in AA/AB_Se versus AB_W regions, turning the prediction into a local-probe experiment.
  • Since the calculations impose a 2.7% compression on WSe2 and a 1.5% expansion on MoS2 to force commensurability, strain is a second control knob that could shift the CB+4 window and therefore the 3D-exciton existence.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies excitonic properties of WSe2/MoS2 van der Waals heterobilayers in three stacking registries (AA, AB_W, AB_Se) using DFT, G0W0 with the generalized plasmon-pole model, and BSE. The authors identify three classes of excitons: 2D intralayer excitons, charge-transfer excitons, and delocalized 3D excitons. They report that 2D and CT excitons appear in all three stackings, while 3D excitons appear only in AA and AB_Se, not in AB_W, and attribute this absence to stacking-dependent interlayer hybridization and symmetry constraints. Monolayer benchmarks for gaps, exciton energies, and binding energies agree well with previous calculations and experiments, supporting the overall methodology. The central stacking-dependent claim, however, rests on the assignment of the 3D exciton to VB-to-CB+4 transitions at K and on a qualitative symmetry/hybridization argument that is not backed by a quantitative analysis.

Significance. If the central claim is correct, the paper would establish a useful design principle: in WSe2/MoS2 heterobilayers, the local stacking registry can switch on or off a delocalized 3D exciton, in addition to the more common 2D and CT excitons. The monolayer benchmarks and the qualitative agreement with prior literature are genuine strengths, and the BSE calculations are performed with a state-of-the-art many-body framework without fitted parameters for the exciton classification. The main value of the paper is therefore conditional on demonstrating that the absence of the 3D exciton in AB_W is a physical consequence of symmetry and hybridization rather than an artifact of the truncated G0W0/BSE treatment.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section II and Section III.C] The central classification of the 3D exciton depends on the position and character of the CB+4 states at K, but no convergence tests are reported for the G0W0 and BSE parameters. Section II states that the G0W0 calculation uses the generalized plasmon-pole model, 350 empty states, and a BSE basis of six conduction bands and six valence bands. If GPP misplaces CB+4 in AB_W, or if the six-band window is insufficient to capture the relevant interlayer states, the reported absence of a 3D exciton in AB_W could be a truncation artifact rather than a physical property. Please provide convergence tests with respect to the number of empty states, the number of BSE bands, and the k-point grid, and show the quasiparticle energies and orbital characters of CB+4 across the three stackings.
  2. [Section III.C, paragraph on the absence of 3D excitons in AB_W] The explanation for the absence of 3D excitons in AB_W is disjunctive and qualitative: the text states that CB+4 states are 'either shifting outside the relevant energy window or becoming optically forbidden due to registry-dependent selection rules.' These two mechanisms are physically distinct and have different consequences, but no group-theoretical selection-rule calculation, irrep analysis, or hybridization matrix-element comparison between AB_W and AB_Se is provided. Since the abstract and introduction advertise a 'symmetry-based analysis,' please supply an explicit symmetry analysis or quantitative matrix elements that distinguish the two possibilities and establish which mechanism is operative in AB_W.
  3. [Section III.C, definition of the 3D exciton] The paper introduces the category '3D exciton' without a quantitative criterion. The assignment is based on visual inspection of the electron density isosurfaces in Fig. 4, where the electron is said to be 'distributed across both layers.' To make the dimensionality claim falsifiable, please define an operational measure, such as the out-of-plane participation ratio, the variance of the exciton wave function along the normal direction, or the fraction of electron density on each layer, and report it for the 3D, 2D, and CT excitons in all stackings. Without such a measure, the distinction between a 3D exciton and a merely delocalized interlayer exciton is not well posed.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section III.C, 2D exciton in AA] The text reports a binding energy of 0.23 meV for the 2D exciton in AA, which is orders of magnitude smaller than all other reported binding energies and is almost certainly a typo for 0.23 eV. Please correct this.
  2. [Section II] There is a duplicated sentence fragment: 'A uniform k-point grid of 27 × 27 × 1 is utilized for both monolayers and bilayer heterostructures to ensure accurate BZ sampling. BZ sampling.' Please remove the duplicate.
  3. [Throughout] There are several typographical and grammatical errors, including 'hight-symmetry' instead of 'high-symmetry', 'This wave function of this exciton', and repeated references (Refs. 64 and 22 appear twice in the reference list). A careful proofreading pass is needed.
  4. [Section III.C, CT exciton discussion] The text states that the CT exciton is 'doubly degenerate optically forbidden' and also 'appearing as the first exciton in all registries,' while the 2D exciton is described as 'the first bright exciton.' Please clarify the ordering of dark and bright states in the spectrum so that the reader can reconcile these statements.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the exciton taxonomy is a direct BSE output, and prior literature is used only for external structural grounding.

full rationale

The paper's central claims are derived by solving the G0W0-BSE equations (Eq. 4) with fixed ab initio inputs; no parameter is fitted to the stacking-dependent exciton classification. The 2D/CT/3D taxonomy is read off the computed BSE eigenvector charge densities in Fig. 4 and the associated transition weights in Fig. 5, so the classification is an output of the calculation rather than an input. The explanation for the absence of 3D excitons in AB_W, namely 'a complex interplay of symmetry constraints, interlayer hybridization effects, and orbital-specific interactions,' is interpretive and may be undersupported, but interpretation of a computed result is not circularity. Citations to prior work are external grounding: Ref. 22 supplies the stacking registries, Refs. 53-54 supply stacking nomenclature, and code/method citations (Yambo, the random integration method, Coulomb truncation) support the computational framework without asserting the paper's physical conclusion. No uniqueness theorem from the authors is invoked, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. Approximations such as the generalized plasmon-pole model, 350 empty states, and a six-band BSE basis raise convergence and correctness risk for the CB+4 assignment, but that is a robustness concern, not a reduction of the derivation to its inputs. Therefore no circular step is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central claim depends on the numerical reliability of the G0W0+BSE pipeline for higher conduction bands, on the representativeness of small strained unit cells for Moire registries, and on the chosen BSE truncation. The classification of excitons into 2D, charge-transfer, and 3D types is a post-processing interpretation of computed wavefunctions, so the symmetry narrative is not an independent derivation.

free parameters (2)
  • BSE band truncation = 6 valence + 6 conduction bands
    The identification of 3D excitons relies on CB+4 states; a larger basis might change the exciton manifold. It is a truncation chosen by the authors, not an input from experiment.
  • Lorentzian broadening = 0.15 eV
    Chosen to smooth absorption spectra; affects apparent peak resolution and height but not peak positions.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption G0W0 with the generalized plasmon-pole model (GPP) accurately describes quasiparticle energies and the ordering of conduction bands (including CB+4) in WSe2/MoS2 heterobilayers
    GPP is an approximation for the frequency-dependent screening; the paper does not benchmark it against full-frequency GW for the higher conduction bands that determine the 3D exciton.
  • domain assumption The 1x1 commensurate unit cell with averaged in-plane lattice constant (3.23 Angstrom) and imposed biaxial strain captures the essential physics of the local AA, AB_W, and AB_Se registries of the Moire pattern
    The strain changes monolayer gaps by 3-7% and the full Moire reconstruction is not modeled; transferability of the exciton classification to real Moire regions is assumed.
  • domain assumption The vdW-D3 correction gives reliable interlayer distances and stacking energetics
    Interlayer distances (3.10-3.72 Angstrom) and the small formation energy differences (0.06-0.07 meV) are sensitive to the vdW functional; the paper does not compare with other vdW corrections.
  • domain assumption BSE with six valence and six conduction bands and a 27x27x1 k-grid is converged for the excitonic states of interest
    No convergence tests are shown; the CB+4-based 3D exciton identification depends on this truncation.
invented entities (1)
  • 3D exciton (delocalized interlayer exciton)
    purpose: Classification of a computed excitonic state where the hole is in one layer and the electron density is distributed across both layers; introduced as a distinct exciton type controlled by stacking.
    The 3D exciton is identified from the computed electron density of a BSE eigenstate; no independent experimental observable is provided beyond the calculated absorption peak. It is a new taxonomy entry rather than a new physical object.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Influence of Interlayer Stacking on Optical Behavior in WSe$_{2}$/MoS$_{2}$ van der Waals Heterostructures." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BNTR7OUE

@misc{pith2026250618607,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Influence of Interlayer Stacking on Optical Behavior in WSe$_2$/MoS$_2$ van der Waals Heterostructures},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BNTR7OUE}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.18607}
}
abstract

We investigate the impact of crystal alignment on excitonic behavior in WSe$_{2}$/MoS$_{2}$ van der Waals heterostructures by comparing eclipsed (AA) and staggered (AB) stacking configurations. Our first-principles and symmetry-based analysis reveal that interlayer stacking symmetry plays a central role in determining the nature of electron-hole pairs. We uncover a rich variety of excitonic states, including spatially confined two-dimensional (2D) excitons, delocalized three-dimensional (3D) excitons, and charge-transfer (CT) excitons with interlayer character. The dimensionality and optical activity of these excitons are governed by the interplay among orbital character, interlayer hybridization, and symmetry-imposed selection rules. Our findings establish general principles for engineering excitonic properties in van der Waals heterostructures through controlled layer orientation and stacking order.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.18607 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) Schematic model of the Moir´e pattern on an R-stacked WSe [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (Color online) Band structures calculated DFT (GGA, thin dashed lines) and the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. (Color online) Left: Optical absorption spectra of WSe [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (Color online) Side view and top view of exciton of charge densities (side and top view) of the three types of excitons [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (Color online) Left: Optical absorption spectra, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

94 extracted references · 43 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    author author K. S. \ Novoselov , author A. Mishchenko , author A. Carvalho , \ and\ author A. H. C. \ Neto ,\ 10.1126/science.aac9439 journal journal Science \ volume 353 ,\ pages aac9439 ( year 2016 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.aac9439 https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.aac9439 NoStop

    doi:10.1126/science.aac9439 2016

  2. [2]

    Xia , author H

    author author F. Xia , author H. Wang , author D. Xiao , author M. Dubey , \ and\ author A. Ramasubramaniam ,\ 10.1038/nphoton.2014.271 title Two-dimensional material nanophotonics , \ ( year 2014 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1038/nphoton.2014.271 2014

  3. [3]

    Fang , author S

    author author H. Fang , author S. Chuang , author T. C. \ Chang , author K. Takei , author T. Takahashi , \ and\ author A. Javey ,\ 10.1021/nl301702r journal journal Nano Letters \ volume 12 ,\ pages 3788 ( year 2012 ) ,\ note pMID: 22697053 ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/https://doi.org/10.1021/nl301702r https://doi.org/10.1021/nl301702r NoStop

    work page doi:10.1021/nl301702r 2012

  4. [4]

    author author K. F. \ Mak , author C. Lee , author J. Hone , author J. Shan , \ and\ author T. F. \ Heinz ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.136805 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 105 ,\ pages 136805 ( year 2010 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.105.136805 2010

  5. [5]

    author author K. F. \ Mak \ and\ author J. Shan ,\ 10.1038/nphoton.2015.282 journal journal Nature Photonics \ volume 10 ,\ pages 216 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1038/nphoton.2015.282 2015

  6. [6]

    author author Q. H. \ Wang , author K. Kalantar-Zadeh , author A. Kis , author J. N. \ Coleman , \ and\ author M. S. \ Strano ,\ 10.1038/nnano.2012.193 journal journal Nature Nanotechnology \ volume 7 ,\ pages 699 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1038/nnano.2012.193 2012

  7. [7]

    Splendiani , author L

    author author A. Splendiani , author L. Sun , author Y. Zhang , author T. Li , author J. Kim , author C.-Y. \ Chim , author G. Galli , \ and\ author F. Wang ,\ 10.1021/nl903868w journal journal Nano Letters \ volume 10 ,\ pages 1271 ( year 2010 ) ,\ note pMID: 20229981 ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/https://doi.org/10.1021/nl903868w https://doi.org/10.1021/nl903...

    doi:10.1021/nl903868w

  8. [8]

    Lopez-Sanchez , author D

    author author O. Lopez-Sanchez , author D. Lembke , author M. Kayci , author A. Radenovic , \ and\ author A. Kis ,\ 10.1038/nnano.2013.100 journal journal Nature Nanotechnology \ volume 8 ,\ pages 497 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1038/nnano.2013.100 2013

Show all 94 references
  1. [9]

    author author F. H. L. \ Koppens , author T. Mueller , author P. Avouris , author A. C. \ Ferrari , author M. S. \ Vitiello , \ and\ author M. Polini ,\ 10.1038/nnano.2014.215 journal journal Nature Nanotechnology \ volume 9 ,\ pages 780 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

    2014 doi

  2. [10]

    author author J. S. \ Ross , author P. Klement , author A. M. \ Jones , author N. J. \ Ghimire , author J. Yan , author D. G. \ Mandrus , author T. Taniguchi , author K. Watanabe , author K. Kitamura , author W. Yao , author D. H. \ Cobden , \ and\ author X. Xu ,\ 10.1038/nnan...

    doi

  3. [11]

    Pospischil , author M

    author author A. Pospischil , author M. M. \ Furchi , \ and\ author T. Mueller ,\ 10.1038/nnano.2014.14 journal journal Nature Nanotechnology \ volume 9 ,\ pages 257 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

    2014 doi

  4. [12]

    author author B. W. H. \ Baugher , author H. O. H. \ Churchill , author Y. Yang , \ and\ author P. Jarillo-Herrero ,\ 10.1038/nnano.2014.25 journal journal Nature Nanotechnology \ volume 9 ,\ pages 262 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

    2014 doi

  5. [13]

    Bernardi , author M

    author author M. Bernardi , author M. Palummo , \ and\ author J. C. \ Grossman ,\ 10.1021/nl401544y journal journal Nano Letters \ volume 13 ,\ pages 3664 ( year 2013 ) ,\ note pMID: 23750910 ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/https://doi.org/10.1021/nl401544y https://doi.org/10.1021/nl4...

    2013 doi

  6. [14]

    author author M. M. \ Furchi , author A. Pospischil , author F. Libisch , author J. Burgd \"o rfer , \ and\ author T. Mueller ,\ 10.1021/nl501962c journal journal Nano Letters \ volume 14 ,\ pages 4785 ( year 2014 ) ,\ note pMID: 25057817 ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/https://doi.or...

    2014 doi

  7. [15]

    Wang , author A

    author author G. Wang , author A. Chernikov , author M. M. \ Glazov , author T. F. \ Heinz , author X. Marie , author T. Amand , \ and\ author B. Urbaszek ,\ 10.1103/RevModPhys.90.021001 journal journal Rev. Mod. Phys. \ volume 90 ,\ pages 021001 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    doi

  8. [16]

    Cao , author G

    author author T. Cao , author G. Wang , author W. Han , author H. Ye , author C. Zhu , author J. Shi , author Q. Niu , author P. Tan , author E. Wang , author B. Liu , \ and\ author J. Feng ,\ 10.1038/ncomms1882 journal journal Nature Communications \ volume 3 ,\ pages 887 ( y...

    doi

  9. [17]

    Xu , author W

    author author X. Xu , author W. Yao , author D. Xiao , \ and\ author T. F. \ Heinz ,\ 10.1038/nphys2942 journal journal Nature Physics \ volume 10 ,\ pages 343 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

    2014 doi

  10. [18]

    Xiao , author G.-B

    author author D. Xiao , author G.-B. \ Liu , author W. Feng , author X. Xu , \ and\ author W. Yao ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.196802 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 108 ,\ pages 196802 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    2012 doi

  11. [19]

    author author K. F. \ Mak , author K. L. \ McGill , author J. Park , \ and\ author P. L. \ McEuen ,\ 10.1126/science.1250140 journal journal Science \ volume 344 ,\ pages 1489 ( year 2014 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.1250140 https:/...

    2014 doi

  12. [20]

    Kormányos , author G

    author author A. Kormányos , author G. Burkard , author M. Gmitra , author J. Fabian , author V. Zólyomi , author N. D. \ Drummond , \ and\ author V. Fal’ko ,\ 10.1088/2053-1583/2/2/022001 journal journal 2D Materials \ volume 2 ,\ pages 022001 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    doi

  13. [21]

    author author A. K. \ Geim \ and\ author I. V. \ Grigorieva ,\ 10.1038/nature12385 journal journal Nature \ volume 499 ,\ pages 419 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

    2013 doi

  14. [23]

    \ Lee , author G.-H

    author author C.-H. \ Lee , author G.-H. \ Lee , author A. M. \ van der Zande , author W. Chen , author Y. Li , author M. Han , author X. Cui , author G. Arefe , author C. Nuckolls , author T. F. \ Heinz , author J. Guo , author J. Hone , \ and\ author P. Kim ,\ 10.1038/nnano....

    doi

  15. [24]

    Yu , author Y

    author author Y. Yu , author Y. Yu , author C. Xu , author A. Barrette , author K. Gundogdu , \ and\ author L. Cao ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.93.201111 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 93 ,\ pages 201111 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    2016 doi

  16. [25]

    Palummo , author M

    author author M. Palummo , author M. Bernardi , \ and\ author J. C. \ Grossman ,\ 10.1021/nl503799t journal journal Nano Letters \ volume 15 ,\ pages 2794 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    2015 doi

  17. [26]

    Molina-S\'anchez , author D

    author author A. Molina-S\'anchez , author D. Sangalli , author K. Hummer , author A. Marini , \ and\ author L. Wirtz ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.88.045412 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 88 ,\ pages 045412 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

    2013 doi

  18. [27]

    Gong , author J

    author author Y. Gong , author J. Lin , author X. Wang , author G. Shi , author S. Lei , author Z. Lin , author X. Zou , author G. Ye , author R. Vajtai , author B. I. \ Yakobson , author H. Terrones , author M. Terrones , author B. Tay , author J. Lou , author S. T. \ Panteli...

    doi

  19. [28]

    Britnell , author R

    author author L. Britnell , author R. M. \ Ribeiro , author A. Eckmann , author R. Jalil , author B. D. \ Belle , author A. Mishchenko , author Y.-J. \ Kim , author R. V. \ Gorbachev , author T. Georgiou , author S. V. \ Morozov , author A. N. \ Grigorenko , author A. K. \ Gei...

    doi

  20. [29]

    Aggoune , author C

    author author W. Aggoune , author C. Cocchi , author D. Nabok , author K. Rezouali , author M. Akli Belkhir , \ and\ author C. Draxl ,\ 10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b00357 journal journal The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters \ volume 8 ,\ pages 1464 ( year 2017 ) ,\ note pMID: 28...

    doi

  21. [30]

    author author E. C. \ Regan , author D. Wang , author C. Jin , author M. I. \ Bakti Utama , author B. Gao , author X. Wei , author S. Zhao , author W. Zhao , author Z. Zhang , author K. Yumigeta , author M. Blei , author J. D. \ Carlstr \"o m , author K. Watanabe , author T. T...

    doi

  22. [31]

    Tang , author L

    author author Y. Tang , author L. Li , author T. Li , author Y. Xu , author S. Liu , author K. Barmak , author K. Watanabe , author T. Taniguchi , author A. H. \ MacDonald , author J. Shan , \ and\ author K. F. \ Mak ,\ 10.1038/s41586-020-2085-3 journal journal Nature \ volume...

    doi

  23. [32]

    Britnell , author R

    author author L. Britnell , author R. V. \ Gorbachev , author R. Jalil , author B. D. \ Belle , author F. Schedin , author A. Mishchenko , author T. Georgiou , author M. I. \ Katsnelson , author L. Eaves , author S. V. \ Morozov , author N. M. R. \ Peres , author J. Leist , au...

    doi

  24. [33]

    Withers , author O

    author author F. Withers , author O. Del Pozo-Zamudio , author A. Mishchenko , author A. P. \ Rooney , author A. Gholinia , author K. Watanabe , author T. Taniguchi , author S. J. \ Haigh , author A. K. \ Geim , author A. I. \ Tartakovskii , \ and\ author K. S. \ Novoselov ,\ ...

    doi

  25. [34]

    Hohenberg \ and\ author W

    author author P. Hohenberg \ and\ author W. Kohn ,\ 10.1103/PhysRev.136.B864 journal journal Phys. Rev. \ volume 136 ,\ pages B864 ( year 1964 ) NoStop

    1964 doi

  26. [35]

    Kohn \ and\ author L

    author author W. Kohn \ and\ author L. J. \ Sham ,\ 10.1103/PhysRev.140.A1133 journal journal Phys. Rev. \ volume 140 ,\ pages A1133 ( year 1965 ) NoStop

    1965 doi

  27. [36]

    Giannozzi , author S

    author author P. Giannozzi , author S. Baroni , author N. Bonini , author M. Calandra , author R. Car , author C. Cavazzoni , author D. Ceresoli , author G. L. \ Chiarotti , author M. Cococcioni , author I. Dabo , et al. ,\ http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/21/39/395502 jour...

    doi

  28. [37]

    Marini , author C

    author author A. Marini , author C. Hogan , author M. Grüning , \ and\ author D. Varsano ,\ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2009.02.003 journal journal Computer Physics Communications \ volume 180 ,\ pages 1392 ( year 2009 ) NoStop

    2009 doi

  29. [38]

    Sangalli , author A

    author author D. Sangalli , author A. Ferretti , author H. Miranda , author C. Attaccalite , author I. Marri , author E. Cannuccia , author P. Melo , author M. Marsili , author F. Paleari , author A. Marrazzo , author G. Prandini , author P. Bonfà , author M. O. \ Atambo , aut...

    doi

  30. [39]

    author author D. R. \ Hamann ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.88.085117 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 88 ,\ pages 085117 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

    2013 doi

  31. [40]

    author author J. P. \ Perdew , author K. Burke , \ and\ author M. Ernzerhof ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 77 ,\ pages 3865 ( year 1996 ) NoStop

    1996 doi

  32. [41]

    Grimme , author J

    author author S. Grimme , author J. Antony , author S. Ehrlich , \ and\ author H. Krieg ,\ 10.1063/1.3382344 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 132 ,\ pages 154104 ( year 2010 ) NoStop

    2010 doi

  33. [42]

    Cheiwchanchamnangij \ and\ author W

    author author T. Cheiwchanchamnangij \ and\ author W. R. L. \ Lambrecht ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.85.205302 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 85 ,\ pages 205302 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    2012 doi

  34. [43]

    author author H. J. \ Monkhorst \ and\ author J. D. \ Pack ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.13.5188 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 13 ,\ pages 5188 ( year 1976 ) NoStop

    1976 doi

  35. [44]

    Hedin ,\ 10.1103/PhysRev.139.A796 journal journal Phys

    author author L. Hedin ,\ 10.1103/PhysRev.139.A796 journal journal Phys. Rev. \ volume 139 ,\ pages A796 ( year 1965 ) NoStop

    1965 doi

  36. [45]

    author author M. S. \ Hybertsen \ and\ author S. G. \ Louie ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.55.1418 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 55 ,\ pages 1418 ( year 1985 ) NoStop

    1985 doi

  37. [46]

    Rohlfing \ and\ author S

    author author M. Rohlfing \ and\ author S. G. \ Louie ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.62.4927 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 62 ,\ pages 4927 ( year 2000 ) NoStop

    doi

  38. [47]

    Onida , author L

    author author G. Onida , author L. Reining , \ and\ author A. Rubio ,\ 10.1103/RevModPhys.74.601 journal journal Rev. Mod. Phys. \ volume 74 ,\ pages 601 ( year 2002 ) NoStop

    2002 doi

  39. [48]

    Guandalini , author P

    author author A. Guandalini , author P. D'Amico , author A. Ferretti , \ and\ author D. Varsano ,\ 10.1038/s41524-023-00989-7 journal journal npj Computational Materials \ volume 9 ,\ pages 44 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

    2023 doi

  40. [49]

    author author R. W. \ Godby \ and\ author R. Needs ,\ @noop journal journal Physical review letters \ volume 62 ,\ pages 1169 ( year 1989 ) NoStop

    1989

  41. [50]

    Hanke \ and\ author L

    author author W. Hanke \ and\ author L. J. \ Sham ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.21.4656 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 21 ,\ pages 4656 ( year 1980 ) NoStop

    1980 doi

  42. [51]

    Strinati ,\ 10.1007/BF02725962 journal journal La Rivista del Nuovo Cimento (1978-1999) \ volume 11 ,\ pages 1826 ( year 1988 ) NoStop

    author author G. Strinati ,\ 10.1007/BF02725962 journal journal La Rivista del Nuovo Cimento (1978-1999) \ volume 11 ,\ pages 1826 ( year 1988 ) NoStop

    1978 doi

  43. [52]

    author author C. A. \ Rozzi , author D. Varsano , author A. Marini , author E. K. U. \ Gross , \ and\ author A. Rubio ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.73.205119 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 73 ,\ pages 205119 ( year 2006 ) NoStop

    2006 doi

  44. [53]

    author author J. D. \ Bernal ,\ http://www.jstor.org/stable/94336 journal journal Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A \ volume 106 ,\ pages 749 ( year 1924 ) NoStop

    1924

  45. [54]

    Constantinescu , author A

    author author G. Constantinescu , author A. Kuc , \ and\ author T. Heine ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.036104 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 111 ,\ pages 036104 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

    2013 doi

  46. [55]

    \ Lin , author R

    author author Y.-C. \ Lin , author R. Ghosh , Ram Krishna nad Addou , author N. Lu , author S. M. \ Eichfeld , author H. Zhu , author M.-Y. \ Li , author X. Peng , author M. J. \ Kim , author L.-J. \ Li , author R. M. \ Wallace , author S. Datta , \ and\ author J. A. \ Robinso...

    doi

  47. [56]

    Ding , author Y

    author author Y. Ding , author Y. Wang , author J. Ni , author L. Shi , author S. Shi , \ and\ author W. Tang ,\ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physb.2011.03.044 journal journal Physica B: Condensed Matter \ volume 406 ,\ pages 2254 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

    2011 doi

  48. [57]

    \ Chang , author X

    author author C.-H. \ Chang , author X. Fan , author S.-H. \ Lin , \ and\ author J.-L. \ Kuo ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.88.195420 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 88 ,\ pages 195420 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

    2013 doi

  49. [58]

    Ramasubramaniam ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.86.115409 journal journal Phys

    author author A. Ramasubramaniam ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.86.115409 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 86 ,\ pages 115409 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    2012 doi

  50. [59]

    Le , author A

    author author D. Le , author A. Barinov , author E. Preciado , author M. Isarraraz , author I. Tanabe , author T. Komesu , author C. Troha , author L. Bartels , author T. S. \ Rahman , \ and\ author P. A. \ Dowben ,\ 10.1088/0953-8984/27/18/182201 journal journal Journal of Ph...

    doi

  51. [60]

    author author G. J. \ Slotman , author G. A. \ de Wijs , author A. Fasolino , \ and\ author M. I. \ Katsnelson ,\ https://doi.org/10.1002/andp.201400155 journal journal Annalen der Physik \ volume 526 ,\ pages 381 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

    doi

  52. [61]

    Milko , author P

    author author M. Milko , author P. Puschnig , \ and\ author C. Draxl ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.86.155416 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 86 ,\ pages 155416 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    2012 doi

  53. [62]

    Dadkhah \ and\ author W

    author author N. Dadkhah \ and\ author W. R. L. \ Lambrecht ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.109.195155 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 109 ,\ pages 195155 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    2024 doi

  54. [64]

    author author D. Y. \ Qiu , author F. H. \ da Jornada , \ and\ author S. G. \ Louie ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.216805 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 111 ,\ pages 216805 ( year 2013 b ) NoStop

    2013 doi

  55. [65]

    Dange , author R

    author author K. Dange , author R. Yogi , \ and\ author A. Shukla ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.23.014008 journal journal Phys. Rev. Appl. \ volume 23 ,\ pages 014008 ( year 2025 ) NoStop

    2025 doi

  56. [66]

    Terrones , author F

    author author H. Terrones , author F. L \'o pez-Ur \'i as , \ and\ author M. Terrones ,\ 10.1038/srep01549 journal journal Scientific Reports \ volume 3 ,\ pages 1549 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

    2013 doi

  57. [67]

    \ Shih , author F

    author author Y.-C. \ Shih , author F. A. \ Nilsson , \ and\ author G.-Y. \ Guo ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.110.205417 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 110 ,\ pages 205417 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    2024 doi

  58. [68]

    author author E. S. \ Kadantsev \ and\ author P. Hawrylak ,\ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssc.2012.02.005 journal journal Solid State Communications \ volume 152 ,\ pages 909 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    2012 doi

  59. [69]

    Marsili , author A

    author author M. Marsili , author A. Molina-S\'anchez , author M. Palummo , author D. Sangalli , \ and\ author A. Marini ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.103.155152 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 103 ,\ pages 155152 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

    2021 doi

  60. [70]

    Schmidt , author I

    author author R. Schmidt , author I. Niehues , author R. Schneider , author M. Drüppel , author T. Deilmann , author M. Rohlfing , author S. M. \ de Vasconcellos , author A. Castellanos-Gomez , \ and\ author R. Bratschitsch ,\ 10.1088/2053-1583/3/2/021011 journal journal 2D Ma...

    doi

  61. [71]

    Aggoune , author C

    author author W. Aggoune , author C. Cocchi , author D. Nabok , author K. Rezouali , author M. A. \ Belkhir , \ and\ author C. Draxl ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.97.241114 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 97 ,\ pages 241114 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    doi

  62. [72]

    \ NoStop

    @noop journal See Supplemental Material at [ ] for additional results, including RPA and BSE optical absorption spectra, exciton charge density distributions, and exciton weights projected onto the interpolated band structure. \ NoStop

  63. [73]

    journal author author J. H. \ Yu , author H. R. \ Lee , author S. S. \ Hong , author D. Kong , author H.-W. \ Lee , author H. Wang , author F. Xiong , author S. Wang , \ and\ author Y. Cui ,\ 10.1021/nl503897h journal journal Nano Letters \ volume 15 ,\ pages 1031 ( year 2015 ...

    doi

  64. [74]

    author author E. M. \ Alexeev , author D. A. \ Ruiz-Tijerina , author M. Danovich , author M. J. \ Hamer , author D. J. \ Terry , author P. K. \ Nayak , author S. Ahn , author S. Pak , author J. Lee , author J. I. \ Sohn , author M. R. \ Molas , author M. Koperski , author K. ...

    doi

  65. [75]

    author author E. M. \ Alexeev , author C. M. \ Purser , author C. M. \ Gilardoni , author J. Kerfoot , author H. Chen , author A. R. \ Cadore , author B. L. \ Rosa , author M. S. G. \ Feuer , author E. Javary , author P. Hays , author K. Watanabe , author T. Taniguchi , author...

    doi

  66. [76]

    author author E. M. \ Alexeev , author A. Catanzaro , author O. V. \ Skrypka , author P. K. \ Nayak , author S. Ahn , author S. Pak , author J. Lee , author J. I. \ Sohn , author K. S. \ Novoselov , author H. S. \ Shin , \ and\ author A. I. \ Tartakovskii ,\ 10.1021/acs.nanole...

    doi

  67. [77]

    Merkl , author F

    author author P. Merkl , author F. Mooshammer , author P. Steinleitner , author A. Girnghuber , author K.-Q. \ Lin , author P. Nagler , author J. Holler , author C. Sch \"u ller , author J. M. \ Lupton , author T. Korn , author S. Ovesen , author S. Brem , author E. Malic , \ ...

    doi

  68. [78]

    Deilmann \ and\ author K

    author author T. Deilmann \ and\ author K. S. \ Thygesen ,\ 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b00438 journal journal Nano Letters \ volume 18 ,\ pages 2984 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    2018 doi

  69. [79]

    Gong , author H

    author author C. Gong , author H. Zhang , author W. Wang , author L. Colombo , author R. M. \ Wallace , \ and\ author K. Cho ,\ 10.1063/1.4817409 journal journal Applied Physics Letters \ volume 103 ,\ pages 053513 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

    doi

  70. [80]

    Kang , author S

    author author J. Kang , author S. Tongay , author J. Zhou , author J. Li , \ and\ author J. Wu ,\ 10.1063/1.4774090 journal journal Applied Physics Letters \ volume 102 ,\ pages 012111 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

    2013 doi

  71. [81]

    Wang , author Z

    author author Y. Wang , author Z. Wang , author W. Yao , author G.-B. \ Liu , \ and\ author H. Yu ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.95.115429 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 95 ,\ pages 115429 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    2017 doi

  72. [82]

    Zhang , author C.-P

    author author C. Zhang , author C.-P. \ Chuu , author X. Ren , author M.-Y. \ Li , author L.-J. \ Li , author C. Jin , author M.-Y. \ Chou , \ and\ author C.-K. \ Shih ,\ 10.1126/sciadv.1601459 journal journal Science Advances \ volume 3 ,\ pages e1601459 ( year 2017 b ) ,\ ht...

    doi

  73. [83]

    Kozawa , author A

    author author D. Kozawa , author A. Carvalho , author I. Verzhbitskiy , author F. Giustiniano , author Y. Miyauchi , author S. Mouri , author A. H. \ Castro Neto , author K. Matsuda , \ and\ author G. Eda ,\ 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b00801 journal journal Nano Letters \ volume 16...

    doi

  74. [84]

    author author K. L. \ Seyler , author P. Rivera , author H. Yu , author N. P. \ Wilson , author E. L. \ Ray , author D. G. \ Mandrus , author J. Yan , author W. Yao , \ and\ author X. Xu ,\ 10.1038/s41586-019-0957-1 journal journal Nature \ volume 567 ,\ pages 66 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    doi

  75. [85]

    Tran , author G

    author author K. Tran , author G. Moody , author F. Wu , author X. Lu , author J. Choi , author K. Kim , author A. Rai , author D. A. \ Sanchez , author J. Quan , author A. Singh , author J. Embley , author A. Zepeda , author M. Campbell , author T. Autry , author T. Taniguchi...

    doi

  76. [86]

    Kunstmann , author F

    author author J. Kunstmann , author F. Mooshammer , author P. Nagler , author A. Chaves , author F. Stein , author N. Paradiso , author G. Plechinger , author C. Strunk , author C. Sch \"u ller , author G. Seifert , author D. R. \ Reichman , \ and\ author T. Korn ,\ 10.1038/s4...

    doi

  77. [87]

    author author P. K. \ Nayak , author Y. Horbatenko , author S. Ahn , author G. Kim , author J.-U. \ Lee , author K. Y. \ Ma , author A.-R. \ Jang , author H. Lim , author D. Kim , author S. Ryu , author H. Cheong , author N. Park , \ and\ author H. S. \ Shin ,\ 10.1021/acsnano...

    doi

  78. [88]

    Heo , author J

    author author H. Heo , author J. H. \ Sung , author S. Cha , author B.-G. \ Jang , author J.-Y. \ Kim , author G. Jin , author D. Lee , author J.-H. \ Ahn , author M.-J. \ Lee , author J. H. \ Shim , author H. Choi , \ and\ author M.-H. \ Jo ,\ 10.1038/ncomms8372 journal journ...

    doi

  79. [89]

    Wu , author T

    author author F. Wu , author T. Lovorn , \ and\ author A. H. \ MacDonald ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.147401 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 118 ,\ pages 147401 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    2017 doi

  80. [90]

    author author A. M. \ van der Zande , author J. Kunstmann , author A. Chernikov , author D. A. \ Chenet , author Y. You , author X. Zhang , author P. Y. \ Huang , author T. C. \ Berkelbach , author L. Wang , author F. Zhang , author M. S. \ Hybertsen , author D. A. \ Muller , ...

    doi

  81. [91]

    Tscheppe , author J

    author author P. Tscheppe , author J. Zang , author M. Klett , author S. Karakuzu , author A. Celarier , author Z. Cheng , author C. A. \ Marianetti , author T. A. \ Maier , author M. Ferrero , author A. J. \ Millis , \ and\ author T. Schäfer ,\ 10.1073/pnas.2311486121 journal...

    doi

  82. [92]

    o rg , author A. S. \ Baimuratov , author S. Y. \ Kruchinin , author I. A. \ Vovk , author J. Scherzer , author J. F \

    author author M. F \"o rg , author A. S. \ Baimuratov , author S. Y. \ Kruchinin , author I. A. \ Vovk , author J. Scherzer , author J. F \"o rste , author V. Funk , author K. Watanabe , author T. Taniguchi , \ and\ author A. H \"o gele ,\ 10.1038/s41467-021-21822-z journal jo...

    doi

  83. [93]

    Cr\'epel \ and\ author A

    author author V. Cr\'epel \ and\ author A. Millis ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.033127 journal journal Phys. Rev. Res. \ volume 6 ,\ pages 033127 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    2024 doi

  84. [94]

    Rakib , author P

    author author T. Rakib , author P. Pochet , author E. Ertekin , \ and\ author H. T. \ Johnson ,\ 10.1063/5.0105405 journal journal Journal of Applied Physics \ volume 132 ,\ pages 120901 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

    2022 doi

  85. [95]

    Devakul , author V

    author author T. Devakul , author V. Cr \'e pel , author Y. Zhang , \ and\ author L. Fu ,\ 10.1038/s41467-021-27042-9 journal journal Nature Communications \ volume 12 ,\ pages 6730 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

    2021 doi

  86. [96]

    Ramos-Alonso , author B

    author author A. Ramos-Alonso , author B. Remez , author D. Bennett , author R. M. \ Fernandes , \ and\ author H. Ochoa ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.134.026501 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 134 ,\ pages 026501 ( year 2025 ) NoStop

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.