pith. sign in

arxiv: 2506.19376 · v2 · submitted 2025-06-24 · 📡 eess.SP

Holographic Communication via Recordable and Reconfigurable Metasurface

Jinzhe Wang , Qinghua Guo , Xiaojun Yuan This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 08:21 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 📡 eess.SP
keywords holographic communicationreconfigurable metasurfacerecordable metasurfacechannel estimationbeamformingmutual informationoutage probability
0
0 comments X

The pith

Recordable and reconfigurable metasurfaces enable holographic communication without needing channel estimation by directly recording the necessary information.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper develops a new scheme for holographic communication using recordable and reconfigurable metasurfaces. By incorporating a recording process inspired by holography, the system captures channel information directly on the surface, removing the need for separate channel estimation. The authors analyze the mutual information and outage probability, showing that this approach performs similarly to traditional reconfigurable holographic surfaces that require perfect channel state information. This matters because channel estimation is particularly difficult in metasurface-based systems, potentially simplifying future wireless network designs.

Core claim

The proposed recordable and reconfigurable metasurface (RRM) scheme records the channel information through the metasurface itself during an initial phase, enabling beamforming via the reconstruction process without requiring explicit channel state information. Analysis demonstrates that the input-output mutual information and outage probability of the RRM-based system are comparable to those of the existing RHS-based system under perfect CSI.

What carries the argument

The recordable and reconfigurable metasurface (RRM), which performs both recording of channel details and subsequent reconstruction for beamforming.

If this is right

  • The RRM scheme achieves performance comparable to RHS with perfect CSI without needing channel estimation.
  • Mutual information and outage probability can be derived and compared directly for the new scheme.
  • This provides a promising alternative for future wireless communication networks by reducing estimation overhead.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This approach may lower the computational and signaling costs associated with channel estimation in high-mobility or large-scale antenna scenarios.
  • It could allow metasurfaces to adapt more quickly in time-varying channels if the recording is fast enough.
  • Integration with existing hardware might be feasible if the recording mechanism can be added without major redesigns.

Load-bearing premise

The recording process on the metasurface accurately captures and stores the channel information without significant noise, distortion, or need for extra hardware.

What would settle it

A direct comparison of the recorded data on the metasurface against actual measured channel coefficients; if they differ substantially due to noise during recording, the claimed performance equivalence would not hold.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.19376 by Jinzhe Wang, Qinghua Guo, Xiaojun Yuan.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Illustration of optical holography and EM holography: (a) Recording process of optical holography; (b) Reconstruction process of optical holography; [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Illustration of the structure of RRM. measuring and recording the intensity of the interference between the reference wave and incoming waves from users during the recording process. As shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Illustration of the interference in EM holography: (a) the reference [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Receive and transmit plane waves. The following definition provides a method for matrix reindexing, which offers a convenient way to obtain the holographic weights. Definition 1: For arbitrary matrix W ∈ CM×N , the rein￾dexed matrix W′ is obtained by the following element-wise mapping: W′ (m, n) = W(M − m + 1, N − n + 1), for m = 1, 2, . . . , M and n = 1, 2, . . . , N. With the help of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:f… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Beam pattern of the RRM with the holographic weight obtained from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Mutual information versus SNR with different values of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Mutual information versus SNR with a varying size of RRM. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Mutual information versus SNR with various recording durations. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Holographic surface based communication technologies are anticipated to play a significant role in the next generation of wireless networks. The existing reconfigurable holographic surface (RHS)-based scheme only utilizes the reconstruction process of the holographic principle for beamforming, where the channel sate information (CSI) is needed. However, channel estimation for CSI acquirement is a challenging task in metasurface based communications. In this study, inspired by both the recording and reconstruction processes of holography, we develop a novel holographic communication scheme by introducing recordable and reconfigurable metasurfaces (RRMs), where channel estimation is not needed thanks to the recording process. Then we analyze the input-output mutual information and outage probability of the RRM-based communication system and compare it with the existing RHS based system. Our results show that, without channel estimation, the proposed scheme achieves performance comparable to that of the RHS scheme with perfect CSI, suggesting a promising alternative for future wireless communication networks.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a holographic communication scheme using recordable and reconfigurable metasurfaces (RRMs). By incorporating a recording process inspired by holography, the scheme aims to achieve beamforming without requiring channel state information (CSI) estimation, unlike existing reconfigurable holographic surface (RHS) approaches. The authors derive expressions for the input-output mutual information and outage probability of the RRM-based system and demonstrate through analysis that its performance is comparable to that of the RHS scheme assuming perfect CSI.

Significance. If the idealized recording assumption holds, this work could offer a significant advancement by eliminating the challenging CSI acquisition in metasurface-based communications, potentially reducing overhead in next-generation wireless networks. The comparison of mutual information and outage probability provides a theoretical foundation for the scheme's viability.

major comments (2)
  1. [System Model] System Model section: the recording process is modeled as an ideal, noiseless capture and storage of the incident field (phase and amplitude) with no hardware non-idealities; this perfect-recording assumption is load-bearing for the central claim that RRM achieves performance comparable to RHS with perfect CSI, yet no quantitative fidelity bounds or error model is introduced.
  2. [Performance Analysis] Performance Analysis section (mutual-information and outage-probability derivations): the equivalence result and the reported comparability hold only under the idealized recording model; without sensitivity analysis to additive recording noise, phase jitter, or finite dynamic range, the 'comparable performance' conclusion cannot be assessed for robustness.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the statement 'performance comparable' would benefit from a brief qualifier on the conditions (e.g., high-SNR regime or specific array size) under which the result is shown.
  2. [Notation] Notation consistency: ensure the channel vectors and beamforming expressions are defined identically when comparing RRM and RHS to facilitate direct reading of the equivalence.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment below and indicate the planned revisions.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [System Model] System Model section: the recording process is modeled as an ideal, noiseless capture and storage of the incident field (phase and amplitude) with no hardware non-idealities; this perfect-recording assumption is load-bearing for the central claim that RRM achieves performance comparable to RHS with perfect CSI, yet no quantitative fidelity bounds or error model is introduced.

    Authors: We agree that the recording process is modeled as ideal and noiseless. This choice establishes the fundamental performance achievable by combining recording and reconstruction without CSI acquisition, paralleling the perfect-CSI assumption made for the RHS benchmark. In the revised manuscript we will explicitly label the assumption in the System Model section, add a short paragraph on its implications for the central claim, and include qualitative remarks on how finite dynamic range or phase errors could be incorporated in future extensions. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Performance Analysis] Performance Analysis section (mutual-information and outage-probability derivations): the equivalence result and the reported comparability hold only under the idealized recording model; without sensitivity analysis to additive recording noise, phase jitter, or finite dynamic range, the 'comparable performance' conclusion cannot be assessed for robustness.

    Authors: The mutual-information and outage-probability expressions are derived under the stated ideal recording model, which yields the reported comparability to perfect-CSI RHS. We acknowledge that robustness to recording imperfections is not quantified. The revised manuscript will add a dedicated paragraph in the Performance Analysis section (or a new Limitations subsection) that discusses the effect of additive recording noise and phase jitter on the derived expressions and outlines how the analysis could be extended, while preserving the current theoretical comparison as an ideal-case benchmark. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper models the RRM scheme with an explicit assumption of ideal recording that captures incident field information, then derives mutual information and outage probability expressions under that model before comparing to the RHS scheme with perfect CSI. This comparison follows directly from applying standard information-theoretic analysis to the defined system rather than redefining terms or fitting parameters such that the result equals the input by construction. No self-citation load-bearing step, uniqueness theorem, or ansatz smuggling is evident in the provided abstract or described structure; the central claim rests on the modeled equivalence of perfect recording to perfect CSI knowledge, which is an assumption open to external validation rather than a tautological reduction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the assumption that the recording process faithfully captures channel state without explicit estimation; no free parameters or invented entities are visible in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The metasurface can perform both recording and reconstruction of the holographic field in a single device without mutual interference or hardware conflicts.
    Invoked when the paper states that channel estimation is not needed thanks to the recording process.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5694 in / 1103 out tokens · 26809 ms · 2026-05-19T08:21:37.802569+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

27 extracted references · 27 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    6G wireless networks: Vision, requirements, architecture, and key technologies,

    Z. Q. Zhang, Y . Xiao, Z. Ma, M. Xiao, Z. G. Ding, X. F. Lei, G. K. Karagiannidis, and P. Z. Fan, “6G wireless networks: Vision, requirements, architecture, and key technologies,” IEEE Veh. Technol. Mag., vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 28–41, Sep. 2019

    work page 2019

  2. [2]

    The roadmap to 6G: AI empowered wireless networks,

    K. B. Letaief, W. Chen, Y . M. Shi, J. Zhang, and Y . J. A. Zhang, “The roadmap to 6G: AI empowered wireless networks,” IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 57, no. 8, pp. 84–90, Aug. 2019

    work page 2019

  3. [3]

    Ten trends in the cellular industry and an outlook on 6G,

    Q. Bi, “Ten trends in the cellular industry and an outlook on 6G,” IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 57, no. 12, pp. 31–36, Dec. 2019

    work page 2019

  4. [4]

    6G wireless systems: Vision, requirements, challenges, insights, and opportunities,

    H. Tataria, M. Shafi, A. F. Molisch, M. Dohler, H. Sjoland, and F. Tufves- son, “6G wireless systems: Vision, requirements, challenges, insights, and opportunities,” Proc. IEEE, vol. 109, no. 7, pp. 1166–1199, Jul. 2021

    work page 2021

  5. [5]

    An overview of transmission theory and techniques of large-scale antenna systems for 5G wireless communications,

    D. Wang, Y . Zhang, H. Wei, X. You, X. Gao, and J. Wang, “An overview of transmission theory and techniques of large-scale antenna systems for 5G wireless communications,” Sci. China Inf. Sci ., vol. 59, no. 8, pp. 1–18, Aug. 2016

    work page 2016

  6. [6]

    Yuan, Y .-J

    X. Yuan, Y .-J. A. Zhang, Y . Shi, W. Yan, and H. Liu, ”Reconfigurable- Intelligent-Surface Empowered Wireless Communications: Challenges and Opportunities,” IEEE Wireless Commun., vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 136-143, Apr. 2021

    work page 2021

  7. [7]

    Z. Xing, R. Wang, and X. Yuan, ”Joint Active and Passive Beamforming Design for Reconfigurable Intelligent Surface Enabled Integrated Sensing and Communication,” IEEE Trans. Commun. , vol. 71, no. 4, pp. 2457- 2474, Apr. 2023

    work page 2023

  8. [8]

    Gong et al., ”Holographic MIMO Communications: Theoretical Foun- dations, Enabling Technologies, and Future Directions,” in IEEE Com- mun

    T. Gong et al., ”Holographic MIMO Communications: Theoretical Foun- dations, Enabling Technologies, and Future Directions,” in IEEE Com- mun. Surveys Tutorials, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 196–257, First quarter 2024

    work page 2024

  9. [9]

    Holographically steered millimeter wave antennas,

    N. Farhat, “Holographically steered millimeter wave antennas,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 476–480, 1980

    work page 1980

  10. [10]

    Holo- graphic artificial impedance surfaces for conformal antennas,

    D. Sievenpiper, J. Colburn, B. Fong, J. Ottusch, and J. Visher, “Holo- graphic artificial impedance surfaces for conformal antennas,” in Proc. 2005 IEEE Antennas Propag. Soc. Int. Symp. , vol. 1B, Jul. 2005, pp. 256–259, vol. 1B

    work page 2005

  11. [11]

    Sidelobe canceling for reconfigurable holographic metamaterial antenna,

    M. C. Johnson, S. L. Brunton, N. B. Kundtz, and J. N. Kutz, “Sidelobe canceling for reconfigurable holographic metamaterial antenna,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 1881–1886, Apr. 2015

    work page 2015

  12. [12]

    Dynam- ically reconfigurable holographic metasurface aperture for a mills-cross monochromatic microwave camera,

    O. Yurduseven, D. L. Marks, T. Fromenteze, and D. R. Smith, “Dynam- ically reconfigurable holographic metasurface aperture for a mills-cross monochromatic microwave camera,” Opt. Express , vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 5281–5291, Feb. 2018

    work page 2018

  13. [13]

    Reconfigurable holographic metasurface aided wideband OFDM communications against beam squint,

    B. Di, “Reconfigurable holographic metasurface aided wideband OFDM communications against beam squint,” IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 70, no. 5, pp. 5099–5103, May 2021

    work page 2021

  14. [14]

    Holographic Beamforming and Phased Arrays , Pivotal Commware, Kirkland, W A, USA, 2019. 12

    work page 2019

  15. [15]

    Metamaterial-Surface Flat-Panel Antenna Technology , Kymeta, Red- mond, W A, USA, 2019

    work page 2019

  16. [16]

    Reconfigurable holographic surface: Holographic beamforming for metasurface-aided wireless communications,

    R. Deng, B. Di, H. Zhang, Y . Tan, and L. Song, “Reconfigurable holographic surface: Holographic beamforming for metasurface-aided wireless communications,” IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol ., vol. 70, no. 6, pp. 6255–6259, Jun. 2021

    work page 2021

  17. [17]

    R. Deng, B. Di, H. Zhang, Y . Tan, and L. Song, ”Reconfigurable Holographic Surface-Enabled Multi-User Wireless Communications: Amplitude-Controlled Holographic Beamforming,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 21, no. 8, pp. 6003-6017, Aug. 2022

    work page 2022

  18. [18]

    R. Deng, B. Di, H. Zhang, and L. Song, ”HDMA: Holographic-Pattern Division Multiple Access,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. , vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 1317-1332, Apr. 2022

    work page 2022

  19. [19]

    R. Deng, B. Di, H. Zhang, H. V . Poor, and L. Song, ”Holographic MIMO for LEO Satellite Communications Aided by Reconfigurable Holographic Surfaces,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. , vol. 40, no. 10, pp. 3071-3085, Oct. 2022

    work page 2022

  20. [20]

    Reconfigurable Holographic Surfaces for Ultra-Massive MIMO in 6G: Practical Design, Optimization and Implementation,

    R. Deng et al., “Reconfigurable Holographic Surfaces for Ultra-Massive MIMO in 6G: Practical Design, Optimization and Implementation,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. , vol. 41, no. 8, pp. 2367-2379, Aug. 2023

    work page 2023

  21. [21]

    Abood, I

    T. Abood, I. Hburi and H. F. Khazaal, ”Massive MIMO: An Overview, Recent Challenges, and Future Research Directions,” 2021 International Conference on Advance of Sustainable Engineering and its Application (ICASEA), Wasit, Iraq, 2021, pp. 43-48

    work page 2021

  22. [22]

    Zheng, L

    K. Zheng, L. Zhao, J. Mei, B. Shao, W. Xiang, and L. Hanzo, ”Survey of Large-Scale MIMO Systems,” IEEE Commun. Surveys Tutorials , vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 1738-1760, third quarter 2015

    work page 2015

  23. [23]

    Huang, J

    C. Huang, J. Xu, W. Xu, X. You, C. Yuen, and Y . Chen, ”Low- Complexity Channel Estimation for Extremely Large-Scale MIMO in Near Field,” IEEE Wireless Communications Letters , vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 671-675, Mar. 2024

    work page 2024

  24. [24]

    Y . Xia, T. Li, and P. Xie, ”Research and Design of Non-stationary Channel Estimation for Extremely Large-Scale Massive MIMO Systems,” J. Signal Process. , vol. 38, no. 9, pp. 1931-1939, Sept. 2022

    work page 1931

  25. [25]

    [Online]

    Enabling holographic communication with 5G technology , Ericsson Technology Review, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.ericsson.com/ en/reports-and-papers/ericsson-technology-review

    work page 2024

  26. [26]

    Tang et al

    W. Tang et al. , ”On Channel Reciprocity in Reconfigurable Intelligent Surface Assisted Wireless Networks,” IEEE Wireless Commun. , vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 94-101, Dec. 2021

    work page 2021

  27. [27]

    Study on Channel Model for Frequencies From 0.5 to 100 GHz (Release 14), document TR 38.901, 3GPP, Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France, Jan. 2018

    work page 2018