Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 81 references

Effective Interactions in Quasi-One-Dimensional Dipolar Quantum Gases

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The standard one-dimensional pseudopotential for dipolar gases in tight traps is quantitatively wrong; the paper derives a regularized 3D-corrected effective potential that matches full three-dimensional calculations.

desk verdict Realistic 3D multichannel calculation shows the standard 1D dipolar pseudopotential is quantitatively unreliable at short distances, but the paper's quantitative mapping rests on an unproven renormalization and a partly circular validation. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.19618 v2 pith:BMRLM55E submitted 2025-06-24 cond-mat.quant-gas

Micha{l} Zdziennicki , Mateusz Ślusarczyk , Krzysztof Paw{l}owski , Krzysztof Jachymski This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.quant-gas PACS 67.85.-d34.50.-s
keywords quasi-one-dimensionaldipolargaseffective1Dinteractionconfinement-inducedresonancepseudopotentialdimensionalreductionquantumdefecttheorymagicangleultracoldatoms
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that the widely used one-dimensional pseudopotential for dipolar atoms in cigar-shaped traps, obtained by integrating out the transverse harmonic-oscillator ground state, misses real three-dimensional physics. Solving the full 3D two-body problem with realistic van der Waals and dipolar potentials shows that coupling to excited transverse modes deepens the effective interaction at short distances and shifts confinement-induced resonances. The authors construct a regularized effective 1D potential, renormalized by the bound-state energy, that reproduces the full 3D spectrum. If correct, every experiment that uses the magic angle as a purely contact-interaction reference, and every many-body calculation built on the old pseudopotential, needs a species- and resonance-specific 3D-to-1D mapping.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the renormalized effective one-dimensional potential built from the lowest adiabatic curve obtained by diagonalizing the dipole-dipole interaction in the basis of transverse harmonic-oscillator modes, with the short-range part fixed by the molecular bound-state energy rather than by the bare 3D parameters. This potential is then used with the exact 3D-to-1D mapping for the coupling constant, which follows the Olshanii formula $g^{(1D)} \propto a_{3D}/(1 - C a_{3D}/l_\perp)$ but with modified resonance position and strength and with energy-dependent corrections. The machinery also includes multichannel quantum-defect theory with a short-range phase and Numerov integration to obtain the trapped 3D spectrum that the 1D model must reproduce.

What would settle it

Measure the two-body energy spectrum or confinement-induced resonance position of dysprosium or erbium atoms in a cigar trap with dipole angle tuned through the magic angle, for a fixed 3D scattering length. If the spectrum follows the Gaussian-integrated pseudopotential of Eq. (10), with a vanishing dipolar correction at the magic angle and an unshifted Olshanii resonance, the paper's central claim is wrong; agreement with the renormalized potential would support it.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the effective interaction in a quasi-one-dimensional dipolar gas is determined by the full 3D scattering problem, not by projecting onto the lowest transverse mode. The paper shows that the regularized dipole-dipole potential obtained by integrating out the transverse ground state (Eq. 10) deviates from the true lowest adiabatic potential already at distances around half the transverse oscillator length, and that the deviation grows as more channels are included. The physical input is the molecular bound-state energy; with that input, a renormalized 1D potential matches the 3D energy levels. The paper further finds that the 3D-to-1D mapping between the 3D scattering length and the 1D coupling constant follows the Olshanii form but with shifted resonance position and strength, with distinct branches for s-wave- and d-wave-dominated resonances, and that residual dipolar corrections persist even at the magic angle where the old pseudopotential predicts no dipolar interaction at all.

Load-bearing premise

Everything rests on the claim that truncating the adiabatic channel basis and renormalizing by the bound-state energy gives a unique effective 1D potential; if different channel sets or different bound states yield different corrected potentials, the '3D correction' is not a well-defined quantity.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Magic-angle experiments cannot be treated as purely contact-interacting reference systems; a residual short-range dipolar potential shifts the 1D scattering length.
  • Confinement-induced resonances shift relative to the single-mode prediction, so locating them experimentally requires solving the 3D problem or using the corrected mapping.
  • Each Feshbach resonance used to tune $a_{3D}$ produces a different 3D-to-1D mapping, meaning 1D parameters are nonuniversal across resonances.
  • Excited-state and quench experiments access energies where the effective range of the interaction matters; a constant $g_{1D}$ fitted to low-lying levels will fail.
  • Quantum-droplet and extended-Hubbard-model simulations that take Eq. (10) as input need the renormalized potential to get phase boundaries right.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The energy-dependence of the fitted $g_{1D}$ suggests that the correct low-energy description of q1D dipolar gases may be a two-channel or frequency-dependent effective interaction, rather than a single static potential.
  • Since the physical parameter is the bound-state energy, the renormalized potential should transfer across species and trap geometries once that energy is matched, offering a testable prediction for molecular dipolar gases now becoming available.
  • The residual $x^{-6}$ tail at the magic angle, though short-ranged and weak, may still matter for many-body phases sensitive to small scattering-length shifts, such as droplet stability boundaries.
  • A direct extension would be to compute the same corrected potential for tilted fields $\theta_F$ between 0 and $\pi/2$ and to tabulate the resonance-shift function, which would let experimental groups interpolate rather than rerun 3D calculations.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies the dimensional reduction of two-body dipolar interactions in a quasi-one-dimensional cigar-shaped harmonic trap. The authors solve the full 3D two-body problem with van der Waals and dipole-dipole potentials using multichannel Numerov propagation with QDT boundary conditions, then compare the resulting spectrum with effective 1D models. They show that the standard single-transverse-mode Gaussian reduction, Eq. (10), fails at short distances, that the lowest adiabatic potential in a truncated harmonic-oscillator basis deviates from the Gaussian result, and that the mapping between the 3D scattering length and the 1D coupling constant is modified and depends on the specific Feshbach resonance. They also report residual interaction at the magic angle, where the standard 1D dipolar term vanishes.

Significance. If the quantitative claims hold, the paper would provide an important correction to the widely used 1D pseudopotential for dipolar gases, with direct consequences for interpreting experiments on excited states, confinement-induced resonances, and many-body phases in reduced dimension. The numerical approach, combining multichannel calculations with QDT boundary conditions, is credible, and the explicit wavefunction cross-sections in Fig. 3 give physical support to the qualitative conclusion that transverse-mode coupling matters at short distances. The paper also honestly identifies nonuniversal, branch-dependent behavior in the 3D-to-1D mapping. However, the quantitative validation is weakened by the absence of convergence tests for the channel-truncated potential and by a validation procedure that fits the 1D model to the same 3D spectrum it then compares against. These issues must be addressed before the central claim of a quantitatively accurate effective 1D potential can be accepted.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section III, Eq. (12) and Fig. 1F] The lowest adiabatic potential is explicitly channel-number dependent: the text states that 'the lowest adiabatic potential gets deeper with the increasing number of included channels.' No renormalization procedure or N-convergence study is supplied. Since the effective 1D potential is derived from this channel-truncated potential, the claimed '3D correction' is cutoff-dependent and the fitted g1D(a3D) mapping is not a uniquely defined object unless a well-defined limit or renormalization condition is established.
  2. [Section IV, Fig. 4] The validation is partly circular. The full 3D spectrum is used to fix the modified resonance position and strength in Eq. (13), and the same spectrum is then used to demonstrate agreement with the corrected 1D model. This does not independently establish that the effective 1D model 'accurately reproduces' 3D results. Please provide an out-of-sample test, for example predicting a spectrum at a different transverse confinement, a different dipole angle, or a different energy window without refitting the short-range parameters.
  3. [Section III, Fig. 4 (lower) and text after Eq. (13)] The statement that 'each branch of the energy spectrum leads to a slightly different fit' means that the extracted g1D is not a single parameter of the model but depends on the branch/energy. The paper does not report the fit residuals per branch or a quantitative criterion for how many branches the 1D model must match. Without such numbers, the visual agreement in Fig. 4 cannot be assessed and the energy-dependent correction remains a fitting statement rather than a predictive result.
  4. [Section II.A, Eq. (13)] The mapping in Eq. (13) is labeled g(1D)_dd even though the text immediately says 'In the absence of dipolar interactions (g(3D)_dd = 0)' and the formula is the standard Olshanii result for the contact coupling g1D. This notation error obscures the role of the dipolar contribution and should be corrected, since Eq. (13) is central to the claimed modified mapping.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Fig. 1 caption] The caption says 'ω∥ = 118kHz and ω⊥ = 10ω⊥'; the second relation should presumably read ω⊥ = 10ω∥ to match the text in Section II.A.
  2. [Section III and Fig. 3] The text refers to 'Fig. 3A' and 'Fig. 3B' when discussing agreement between 1D and 3D spectra and branch-dependent fits, but Fig. 3 shows wavefunction cross sections. The spectral comparisons appear in Fig. 4; please correct the cross-references.
  3. [Eq. (10)] Equation (10) is split across two displayed lines with a dangling '∝' and the argument of the exponential/erfc is not fully specified. Please define u = x/l⊥ and state the precise regularization of the δ-function term.
  4. [Section IV] The conclusion that the corrected 1D model works 'outside of confinement-induced resonance (CIR) regimes' is stated without a precise definition of what 'outside' means. Please specify the range of |a3D|/l⊥ or the proximity to the CIR where the model is expected to be quantitatively accurate.
  5. [General] The paper mentions 'Dysprosium at θF = 0' in Fig. 1E and 'Erbium particles' in Fig. 3, but does not clearly state the atomic species and parameters used for each figure. Please add explicit parameter tables or state in the captions which species, trap frequencies, and dipole strengths are used.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

Corrected 1D model is fitted to the same 3D spectrum it is claimed to reproduce; the renormalized potential's short-range parameter is set by the target bound-state energy.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section III (Dimensional Reduction), after Eq. (13); Fig. 4 caption]
    "The key result is that with the use of proper regularization of the dipolar potential, the mapping (a3D, g1D) follows the functional form of Eq. (13) with modified resonance position and strength. Furthermore, we find significant finite-energy corrections, as each branch of the energy spectrum leads to a slightly different fit, shown in Fig. 3B."

    The corrected model's parameters are determined by fitting the same full 3D energy spectrum that Fig. 4 (upper) then shows the corrected 1D model matching. The paper states the fit explicitly ('each branch of the energy spectrum leads to a slightly different fit') and the Fig. 4 caption labels the curves as 'fits to formula (13) with variable position and strength.' The match 'After correction, the 1D calculation matches the full 3D results' is thus an in-sample reproduction, not an independent prediction; the central validation of the effective potential reduces to a fit to its own target.

  2. self definitional [Section III (Dimensional Reduction), paragraph on adiabatic potentials and channel truncation]
    "Note that as the 3D interaction diverges at the origin, the lowest adiabatic potential gets deeper with the increasing number of included channels. The physical parameter of this model is the bound state energy."

    The 1D potential is renormalized by declaring the bound state energy to be the physical parameter, and the paper's procedure is to first compute the full 3D spectrum and then adjust the 1D model to it. Since the bound state energy is an input taken from the 3D problem, the '3D correction' is defined in terms of the very spectrum the model is later said to reproduce. The cutoff dependence in channel number N is acknowledged but no convergent renormalization is demonstrated, so the corrected potential is not an independent first-principles object.

full rationale

The paper contains genuine independent content: the full 3D multichannel computation falsifies the single-transverse-mode pseudopotential of Eq. (10), and the shape of the lowest adiabatic potential from Eq. (12) is derived without fitting. However, the central validation claim that the 'regularized effective 1D potential accurately reproduces the energy levels observed in full 3D calculations' is partly by construction, because the short-range coupling and the modified resonance position and strength are fitted branch-by-branch to that same 3D spectrum. The renormalization of the channel-truncated adiabatic potential is asserted rather than demonstrated: the text acknowledges the lowest adiabatic potential deepens with channel number and makes the bound state energy the physical parameter, but the bound state energy is itself extracted from the 3D problem being matched. No self-citation chain is load-bearing; the self-citations are background. The circularity is therefore partial and confined to the validation of the corrected 1D model, not to the falsification of the standard approximation.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on several modeling choices: the QDT single-channel parametrization of short-range physics, the adiabatic transverse-mode reduction, and the channel-truncated potential renormalization. The quantitative 3D-to-1D mapping also introduces fitted free parameters. No new physical entities are introduced; the corrected effective potential is an effective model, not a new mediator or particle.

free parameters (2)
  • 1D short-range coupling g1D (per energy branch) = not reported; fit uses modified resonance position and strength in an Eq. (13)-type formula
    Section III: 'each branch of the energy spectrum leads to a slightly different fit'; the mapping is tuned to reproduce the 3D spectrum, so the coupling is a fitted parameter.
  • Bound-state energy used as physical renormalization input = not specified
    Section III: the divergent channel-truncated adiabatic potential is made physical by fixing the bound-state energy, but the chosen energies are not listed or justified independently.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption At short range, the isotropic van der Waals interaction dominates and short-range physics can be parametrized by a single QDT phase shift (or vdW scattering length avdW).
    Section II.B: bound states are described by a zero-energy vdW solution parameterized by a short-range phase; this neglects hyperfine structure and short-range anisotropy, acknowledged in Section II.A.
  • domain assumption Transverse confinement can be integrated out by projecting onto harmonic-oscillator modes and keeping the lowest adiabatic potential; the resulting 1D Hamiltonian of contact plus nonlocal dipole terms captures the low-energy spectrum.
    Section III: the effective potential is constructed from Eq. (12) in the transverse harmonic basis, and the 1D model is compared to the full 3D spectrum.
  • ad hoc to paper The channel-truncated lowest adiabatic potential can be renormalized by treating the bound-state energy as the physical parameter, despite the potential becoming deeper as channels increase.
    Section III: 'as the 3D interaction diverges at the origin, the lowest adiabatic potential gets deeper with the increasing number of included channels. The physical parameter of this model is the bound state energy.' This renormalization is not independently justified.
  • domain assumption A 3D contact plus dipole interaction of the form VvdW + Vdd, with harmonic trapping, is sufficient for comparing Er/Dy systems; molecular multichannel structure is not needed.
    Section II.A: Hamiltonian (3) neglects short-range anisotropies and hyperfine structure, which the authors state would lead to multiple channels and possibly chaotic statistics.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Effective Interactions in Quasi-One-Dimensional Dipolar Quantum Gases." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BMRLM55E

@misc{pith2026250619618,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Effective Interactions in Quasi-One-Dimensional Dipolar Quantum Gases},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BMRLM55E}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.19618}
}
read the original abstract

Ultracold dipolar atoms and molecules provide a flexible quantum simulation platform for studying strongly interacting many-body systems. Determining microscopic Hamiltonian parameters of the simulator is crucial for it to be useful. We study effective interactions emerging in quasi-one-dimensional (q1D) dipolar quantum gases, revealing significant nonuniversal corrections to the commonly used 1D pseudopotential. We demonstrate that a full 3D treatment employing realistic interaction potentials is essential for describing the reduced-dimensional system. Our findings are particularly relevant to experiments probing excited states and nonequilibrium phenomena.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.19618 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: (A) Schematic of the 3D system: Two dipolar particles, aligned by an external magnetic field, are confined [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: The energy spectrum before and after the conversion from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3: Cross sections of wavefunction at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: (upper) Energy of two-particle states as a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Analysis of the 1D system with dipole-dipole [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

81 extracted references · 66 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Giamarchi,Quantum Physics in One Dimension (Ox- ford University Press, 2004)

    T. Giamarchi,Quantum Physics in One Dimension (Ox- ford University Press, 2004)

    2004

  2. [2]

    E. H. Lieb and W. Liniger, Exact Analysis of an Interact- ing Bose Gas. I. The General Solution and the Ground State, Phys. Rev.130, 1605 (1963)

    1963

  3. [3]

    E. H. Lieb, Exact analysis of an interacting bose gas. ii. the excitation spectrum, Phys. Rev.130, 1616 (1963)

    1963

  4. [4]

    Girardeau, Relationship between Systems of Impene- trable Bosons and Fermions in One Dimension, J

    M. Girardeau, Relationship between Systems of Impene- trable Bosons and Fermions in One Dimension, J. Math. Phys. 1, 516 (1960)

    work page 1960

  5. [5]

    J. B. McGuire, Study of Exactly Soluble One- Dimensional N-Body Problems, J. Math. Phys. 5, 622 (1964)

    work page 1964

  6. [6]

    E. H. Lieb and J. Yngvason, Ground state energy of the low density bose gas, Phys. Rev. Lett.80, 2504 (1998)

    work page 1998

  7. [7]

    G. E. Astrakharchik and S. Giorgini, Quantum monte carlo study of the three- to one-dimensional crossover for a trapped bose gas, Phys. Rev. A66, 053614 (2002). 7

    work page 2002

  8. [8]

    E. H. Lieb, R. Seiringer, and J. Yngvason, One- dimensional bosons in three-dimensional traps, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 150401 (2003)

    work page 2003

Show all 81 references
  1. [9]

    Seiringer and J

    R. Seiringer and J. Yin, The Lieb-Liniger Model as a Limit of Dilute Bosons in Three Dimensions, Commun. Math. Phys. 284, 459 (2008)

    2008

  2. [10]

    Greiner, I

    M. Greiner, I. Bloch, O. Mandel, T. W. Hänsch, and T. Esslinger, Exploring Phase Coherence in a 2D Lat- tice of Bose-Einstein Condensates, Phys. Rev. Lett.87, 160405 (2001)

    2001

  3. [11]

    Moritz, T

    H. Moritz, T. Stöferle, M. Köhl, and T. Esslinger, Excit- ing Collective Oscillations in a Trapped 1D Gas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 250402 (2003)

    2003

  4. [12]

    B. L. Tolra, K. M. O’Hara, J. H. Huckans, W. D. Phillips, S. L. Rolston, and J. V. Porto, Observation of Reduced Three-Body Recombination in a Correlated 1D Degener- ate Bose Gas, Phys. Rev. Lett.92, 190401 (2004)

    2004

  5. [13]

    Esteve, J.-B

    J. Esteve, J.-B. Trebbia, T. Schumm, A. Aspect, C. I. Westbrook, and I. Bouchoule, Observations of Density Fluctuations in an Elongated Bose Gas: Ideal Gas and Quasicondensate Regimes, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 130403 (2006)

    2006

  6. [14]

    Kinoshita, T

    T. Kinoshita, T. Wenger, and D. S. Weiss, A quantum Newton’s cradle, Nature440, 900 (2006)

    2006

  7. [15]

    Hofferberth, I

    S. Hofferberth, I. Lesanovsky, B. Fischer, T. Schumm, and J. Schmiedmayer, Non-equilibrium coherence dy- namics in one-dimensional Bose gases, Nature449, 324 (2007)

    2007

  8. [16]

    Haller, M

    E. Haller, M. Gustavsson, M. J. Mark, J. G. Danzl, R. Hart, G. Pupillo, and H.-C. Nägerl, Realization of an Excited, Strongly Correlated Quantum Gas Phase, Sci- ence 325, 1224 (2009)

    2009

  9. [17]

    Gring, M

    M. Gring, M. Kuhnert, T. Langen, T. Kitagawa, B. Rauer, M. Schreitl, I. Mazets, D. A. Smith, E. Dem- ler, and J. Schmiedmayer, Relaxation and Prethermaliza- tion in an Isolated Quantum System, Science337, 1318 (2012)

    2012

  10. [18]

    Langen, T

    T. Langen, T. Gasenzer, and J. Schmiedmayer, Prether- malization and universal dynamics in near-integrable quantum systems, J. Stat. Mech.: Theory Exp.2016 (6), 064009

    2016

  11. [19]

    Khaykovich, F

    L. Khaykovich, F. Schreck, G. Ferrari, T. Bourdel, J. Cu- bizolles, L. D. Carr, Y. Castin, and C. Salomon, Forma- tion of a Matter-Wave Bright Soliton, Science296, 1290 (2002)

    2002

  12. [20]

    Hulet, Formation and propagation of matter-wave soliton trains, Nature 417, 150 (2002)

    K.E.Strecker, G.B.Partridge, A.G.Truscott,andR.G. Hulet, Formation and propagation of matter-wave soliton trains, Nature 417, 150 (2002)

    2002

  13. [21]

    Burger, K

    S. Burger, K. Bongs, S. Dettmer, W. Ertmer, K. Sen- gstock, A. Sanpera, G. V. Shlyapnikov, and M. Lewen- stein, Dark solitons in bose-einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 5198 (1999)

    1999

  14. [22]

    Haller, M

    E. Haller, M. J. Mark, R. Hart, J. G. Danzl, L. Reich- söllner, V. Melezhik, P. Schmelcher, and H.-C. Nägerl, Confinement-Induced Resonances in Low-Dimensional Quantum Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.104, 153203 (2010)

    2010

  15. [23]

    Aikawa, A

    K. Aikawa, A. Frisch, M. Mark, S. Baier, A. Rietzler, R. Grimm, and F. Ferlaino, Bose-einstein condensation of erbium, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 210401 (2012)

    2012

  16. [24]

    M. Lu, N. Q. Burdick, S. H. Youn, and B. L. Lev, Strongly dipolar bose-einstein condensate of dysprosium, Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 190401 (2011)

    2011

  17. [25]

    Kadau, M

    H. Kadau, M. Schmitt, M. Wenzel, C. Wink, T. Maier, I. Ferrier-Barbut, and T. Pfau, Observing the rosensweig instability of a quantum ferrofluid, Nature530, 194–197 (2016)

    2016

  18. [26]

    Chomaz, S

    L. Chomaz, S. Baier, D. Petter, M. J. Mark, F. Wächtler, L. Santos, and F. Ferlaino, Quantum-fluctuation-driven crossover from a dilute bose-einstein condensate to a macrodroplet in a dipolar quantum fluid, Phys. Rev. X 6, 041039 (2016)

    2016

  19. [27]

    Schmitt, M

    M. Schmitt, M. Wenzel, F. Böttcher, I. Ferrier-Barbut, and T. Pfau, Self-bound droplets of a dilute magnetic quantum liquid, Nature539, 259 (2016)

    2016

  20. [28]

    M. Guo, F. Böttcher, J. Hertkorn, J.-N. Schmidt, M. Wenzel, H. P. Büchler, T. Langen, and T. Pfau, The low-energy Goldstone mode in a trapped dipolar super- solid, Nature 574, 386 (2019)

    2019

  21. [29]

    Chomaz, D

    L. Chomaz, D. Petter, P. Ilzhöfer, G. Natale, A. Traut- mann, C. Politi, G. Durastante, R. M. W. van Bijnen, A. Patscheider, M. Sohmen, M. J. Mark, and F. Ferlaino, Long-lived and transient supersolid behaviors in dipolar quantum gases, Phys. Rev. X9, 021012 (2019)

    2019

  22. [30]

    A. S. Arkhipov, G. E. Astrakharchik, A. V. Belikov, and Y. E. Lozovik, Ground-state properties of a one- dimensional system of dipoles, Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics Letters82, 39 (2005)

    2005

  23. [31]

    M. D. Girardeau and G. E. Astrakharchik, Super-Tonks- Girardeau State in an Attractive One-Dimensional Dipo- lar Gas, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 235305 (2012)

    2012

  24. [32]

    N. G. Parker and D. H. J. O’Dell, Thomas-fermi ver- sus one- and two-dimensional regimes of a trapped dipo- lar bose-einstein condensate, Phys. Rev. A 78, 041601 (2008)

    2008

  25. [33]

    T.Bland, M.J.Edmonds, N.P.Proukakis, A.M.Martin, D. H. J. O’Dell, and N. G. Parker, Controllable nonlocal interactionsbetweendarksolitonsindipolarcondensates, Phys. Rev. A92, 063601 (2015)

    2015

  26. [34]

    Pawłowski and K

    K. Pawłowski and K. Rzążewski, Dipolar dark solitons, New J. Phys.17, 105006 (2015)

    2015

  27. [35]

    B. B. Baizakov, F. K. Abdullaev, B. A. Malomed, and M. Salerno, Solitons in the Tonks–Girardeau gas with dipolar interactions, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys.42, 175302 (2009)

    2009

  28. [36]

    J. P. Corson, R. M. Wilson, and J. L. Bohn, Stability spectroscopy of rotons in a dipolar bose gas, Phys. Rev. A 87, 051605 (2013)

    2013

  29. [37]

    Ołdziejewski, W

    R. Ołdziejewski, W. Górecki, K. Pawłowski, and K. Rzążewski, Strongly correlated quantum droplets in quasi-1d dipolar bose gas, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 090401 (2020)

    2020

  30. [38]

    Edmonds, T

    M. Edmonds, T. Bland, and N. Parker, Quantum droplets of quasi-one-dimensional dipolar Bose–Einstein condensates, J. Phys. Commun.4, 125008 (2020)

    2020

  31. [39]

    De Palo, E

    S. De Palo, E. Orignac, and R. Citro, Formation and fragmentation of quantum droplets in a quasi-one- dimensional dipolar bose gas, Phys. Rev. B106, 014503 (2022)

    2022

  32. [40]

    De Palo, R

    S. De Palo, R. Citro, and E. Orignac, Variational Bethe ansatz approach for dipolar one-dimensional bosons, Phys. Rev. B101, 045102 (2020)

    2020

  33. [41]

    S. Pal, D. Baillie, and P. B. Blakie, Infinite dipolar droplet: A simple theory for the macrodroplet regime, Phys. Rev. A105, 023308 (2022)

    2022

  34. [42]

    Ołdziejewski, W

    R. Ołdziejewski, W. Górecki, K. Pawłowski, and K. Rzążewski, Roton in a few-body dipolar system, New J. Phys. 20, 123006 (2018)

    2018

  35. [43]

    L. H. Kristinsdóttir, O. Karlström, J. Bjerlin, J. C. Cre- 8 mon, P. Schlagheck, A. Wacker, and S. M. Reimann, Total current blockade in an ultracold dipolar quantum wire, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 085303 (2013)

    2013

  36. [44]

    P. Zin, M. Pylak, T. Wasak, K. Jachymski, and Z. Idzi- aszek, Quantum droplets in a dipolar Bose gas at a di- mensional crossover, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys.54, 165302 (2021)

    2021

  37. [45]

    Morera, B

    I. Morera, B. Juliá-Díaz, and M. Valiente, Universality of quantum liquids and droplets in one dimension, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, L042024 (2022)

    2022

  38. [46]

    Morera, R

    I. Morera, R. Ołdziejewski, G. E. Astrakharchik, and B.Juliá-Díaz,Superexchangeliquefactionofstronglycor- related lattice dipolar bosons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 023602 (2023)

    2023

  39. [47]

    Kraus, T

    R. Kraus, T. Chanda, J. Zakrzewski, and G. Morigi, Quantum phases of dipolar bosons in one-dimensional optical lattices, Phys. Rev. B106, 035144 (2022)

    2022

  40. [48]

    Bland, K

    T. Bland, K. Pawłowski, M. J. Edmonds, K. Rzążewski, and N. G. Parker, Interaction-sensitive oscillations of dark solitons in trapped dipolar condensates, Phys. Rev. A 95, 063622 (2017)

    2017

  41. [49]

    G. E. Astrakharchik and Y. E. Lozovik, Super-tonks- girardeau regime in trapped one-dimensional dipolar gases, Phys. Rev. A77, 013404 (2008)

    2008

  42. [50]

    Marciniak, M

    M. Marciniak, M. Łebek, J. Kopyciński, W. Górecki, R. Ołdziejewski, and K. Pawłowski, Super-tonks- girardeau quench in the extended bose-hubbard model, Phys. Rev. A108, 043304 (2023)

    2023

  43. [51]

    Molignini and B

    P. Molignini and B. Chakrabarti, Interaction quench of dipolar bosons in a one-dimensional optical lattice, Phys. Rev. Res. 7, 013257 (2025)

    2025

  44. [52]

    Kao, K.-Y

    W. Kao, K.-Y. Li, K.-Y. Lin, S. Gopalakrishnan, and B. L. Lev, Topological pumping of a 1D dipolar gas into strongly correlated prethermal states, Science 371, 296 (2021)

    2021

  45. [53]

    K. Yang, Y. Zhang, K.-Y. Li, K.-Y. Lin, S. Gopalakr- ishnan, M. Rigol, and B. L. Lev, Phantom energy in the nonlinear response of a quantum many-body scar state, arXiv 10.48550/arXiv.2308.11615 (2023), 2308.11615

    2023 doi arXiv

  46. [54]

    K.-Y. Li, Y. Zhang, K. Yang, K.-Y. Lin, S. Gopalakrish- nan, M. Rigol, and B. L. Lev, Rapidity and momentum distributions of one-dimensional dipolar quantum gases, Phys. Rev. A107, L061302 (2023)

    2023

  47. [55]

    L. Su, A. Douglas, M. Szurek, R. Groth, S. F. Ozturk, A. Krahn, A. H. Hébert, G. A. Phelps, S. Ebadi, S. Dick- erson, et al., Dipolar quantum solids emerging in a hub- bard quantum simulator, Nature622, 724 (2023)

    2023

  48. [56]

    L. Du, P. Barral, M. Cantara, J. de Hond, Y.-K. Lu, and W. Ketterle, Atomic physics on a 50-nm scale: Realiza- tion of a bilayer system of dipolar atoms, Science384, 546 (2024)

    2024

  49. [57]

    Olshanii, Atomic Scattering in the Presence of an Ex- ternal Confinement and a Gas of Impenetrable Bosons, Phys

    M. Olshanii, Atomic Scattering in the Presence of an Ex- ternal Confinement and a Gas of Impenetrable Bosons, Phys. Rev. Lett.81, 938 (1998)

    1998

  50. [58]

    Idziaszek and T

    Z. Idziaszek and T. Calarco, Analytical solutions for the dynamics of two trapped interacting ultracold atoms, Phys. Rev. A74, 022712 (2006)

    2006

  51. [59]

    Giovanazzi and D

    S. Giovanazzi and D. H. J. O’Dell, Instabilities and the roton spectrum of a quasi-1D Bose-Einstein condensed gas with dipole-dipole interactions, Eur. Phys. J. D31, 439 (2004)

    2004

  52. [60]

    Deuretzbacher, J

    F. Deuretzbacher, J. C. Cremon, and S. M. Reimann, Ground-state properties of few dipolar bosons in a quasi- one-dimensional harmonic trap, Phys. Rev. A81, 063616 (2010)

    2010

  53. [61]

    Deuretzbacher, J

    F. Deuretzbacher, J. C. Cremon, and S. M. Reimann, Erratum: Ground-state properties of few dipolar bosons in a quasi-one-dimensional harmonic trap [phys. rev. a 81, 063616 (2010)], Phys. Rev. A87, 039903 (2013)

    2010

  54. [62]

    Lahaye, C

    T. Lahaye, C. Menotti, L. Santos, M. Lewenstein, and T. Pfau, The physics of dipolar bosonic quantum gases, Reports on Progress in Physics72, 126401 (2009)

    2009

  55. [63]

    Giovanazzi, A

    S. Giovanazzi, A. Görlitz, and T. Pfau, Tuning the dipo- lar interaction in quantum gases, Phys. Rev. Lett.89, 130401 (2002)

    2002

  56. [64]

    Sinha and L

    S. Sinha and L. Santos, Cold dipolar gases in quasi- one-dimensional geometries, Phys. Rev. Lett.99, 140406 (2007)

    2007

  57. [65]

    Giannakeas, V

    P. Giannakeas, V. Melezhik, and P. Schmelcher, Dipo- lar confinement-induced resonances of ultracold gases in waveguides, Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 183201 (2013)

    2013

  58. [66]

    Shi and S

    T. Shi and S. Yi, Observing dipolar confinement-induced resonances in quasi-one-dimensional atomic gases, Phys. Rev. A 90, 042710 (2014)

    2014

  59. [67]

    L. Guan, X. Cui, R. Qi, and H. Zhai, Quasi-one- dimensional dipolar quantum gases, Phys. Rev. A 89, 023604 (2014)

    2014

  60. [68]

    Y. Tang, W. Kao, K.-Y. Li, S. Seo, K. Mallayya, M. Rigol, S. Gopalakrishnan, and B. L. Lev, Thermal- ization near integrability in a dipolar quantum newton’s cradle, Phys. Rev. X8, 021030 (2018)

    2018

  61. [69]

    Korbmacher, G

    H. Korbmacher, G. A. Domínguez-Castro, W.-H. Li, J. Zakrzewski, and L. Santos, Transversal effects on the ground state of hard-core dipolar bosons in one- dimensional optical lattices, Phys. Rev. A107, 063307 (2023)

    2023

  62. [70]

    Maier, H

    T. Maier, H. Kadau, M. Schmitt, M. Wenzel, I. Ferrier- Barbut, T. Pfau, A. Frisch, S. Baier, K. Aikawa, L. Chomaz, M. J. Mark, F. Ferlaino, C. Makrides, E. Tiesinga, A. Petrov, and S. Kotochigova, Emergence of chaotic scattering in ultracold er and dy, Phys. Rev. X 5, 041029 (2015)

    2015

  63. [71]

    J. Bohn, M. Cavagnero, and C. Ticknor, Quasi-universal dipolar scattering in cold and ultracold gases, New Jour- nal of Physics11, 055039 (2009)

    2009

  64. [72]

    Quéméner, M

    G. Quéméner, M. Lepers, and O. Dulieu, Dynamics of ultracold dipolar particles in a confined geometry and tilted fields, Phys. Rev. A92, 042706 (2015)

    2015

  65. [73]

    Gao, Solutions of the schrödinger equation for an at- tractive 1/r6 potential, Phys

    B. Gao, Solutions of the schrödinger equation for an at- tractive 1/r6 potential, Phys. Rev. A58, 1728 (1998)

    1998

  66. [74]

    B.R.Johnson,Newnumericalmethodsappliedtosolving the one-dimensional eigenvalue problem, The Journal of Chemical Physics 67, 4086–4093 (1977)

    1977

  67. [75]

    Johnson, The renormalized numerov method ap- plied to calculating bound states of the coupled-channel schroedinger equation, The Journal of Chemical Physics 69, 4678 (1978)

    B. Johnson, The renormalized numerov method ap- plied to calculating bound states of the coupled-channel schroedinger equation, The Journal of Chemical Physics 69, 4678 (1978)

    1978

  68. [76]

    E. L. Bolda, E. Tiesinga, and P. S. Julienne, Effective- scattering-length model of ultracold atomic collisions and feshbach resonances in tight harmonic traps, Phys. Rev. A 66, 013403 (2002)

    2002

  69. [77]

    Bigagli, W

    N. Bigagli, W. Yuan, S. Zhang, B. Bulatovic, T. Karman, I. Stevenson, and S. Will, Observation of Bose–Einstein condensation of dipolar molecules, Nature 631, 289 (2024)

    2024

  70. [78]

    Schmidt, L

    M. Schmidt, L. Lassablière, G. Quéméner, and T. Lan- gen, Self-bound dipolar droplets and supersolids in molecular bose-einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. Res.4, 9 013235 (2022)

    2022

  71. [79]

    Kopyciński, M

    J. Kopyciński, M. Łebek, W. Górecki, and K. Pawłowski, Ultrawidedarksolitonsanddroplet-solitoncoexistencein a dipolar bose gas with strong contact interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 043401 (2023)

    2023

  72. [80]

    Langen, J

    T. Langen, J. Boronat, J. Sánchez-Baena, R. Bom- bín, T. Karman, and F. Mazzanti, Dipolar droplets of strongly interacting molecules, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 053001 (2025)

    2025

  73. [81]

    Łebek, J

    M. Łebek, J. Kopyciński, W. Górecki, R. Ołdziejewski, and K. Pawłowski, Phase diagram and elementary exci- tations of strongly interacting droplets with non-local in- teractions, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics 58, 065301 (2025)

    2025

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.