Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 43 references

Novel Approximation of the Modified Mild Slope Equation

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper derives explicit shallow-water-like approximations (SMSE1, SMSE2) to the modified mild-slope equation and validates them on four wave scattering benchmarks.

desk verdict Two explicit shallow-water-like approximations to the MMSE with sound algebra and good benchmark agreement, but the 'wide range' claim is tied to a simplified comparator and the paper lacks numerical reproducibility details. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.19854 v1 pith:EYPDQMJN submitted 2025-06-09 physics.ao-ph physics.flu-dyn

Chengnian Xiao This is my paper
classification physics.ao-phphysics.flu-dyn
keywords equationmodifiedwavesimplifiedwaterequationsmildmild-slope
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Ocean waves moving over an uneven seafloor are hard to predict because the wave speed depends on both the depth and the wavelength through a nonlinear equation. The standard tool, the modified mild-slope equation (MMSE), handles this by solving that nonlinear dispersion relation at every point of the seafloor, which makes the model slow and difficult to analyze. This paper starts from a simplified version of the MMSE, Porter's equation ∇·(k^{-2}∇ζ)+ζ=0, and replaces the local wave number k(h,ν) with an explicit Taylor approximation obtained from the dispersion relation. Truncating the expansion at first order in νh (where ν=ω²/g and h is depth) produces two new equations, SMSE1 and SMSE2, that have the same structure as the linear shallow-water equation but with a depth-dependent coefficient.

The authors then solve these new equations for four classic scattering problems: Roseau's exact shoaling profile, Booij's planar slope, a sinusoidal ripple bed studied by Davies and Heathershaw, and artificial bars studied by Kirby and Anton. In each case they compare reflection coefficients with the MMSE, with experimental data, and with other mild-slope variants. The simplified equations track the MMSE closely, including the primary and secondary Bragg resonances in the ripple tests, although the paper admits deviations for intermediate wave numbers 1

The contribution is practical rather than conceptual: the approximation is a straightforward expansion, but it yields equations simple enough to implement in existing shallow-water codes and potentially to solve analytically in some geometries.

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim, stated in the abstract, is that 'the simplified equations agree with the modified mild slope equation at leading orders in the forcing frequency and local depth' and that they 'replicate the predictions of the modified mild slope equations over a wide range of wave numbers and surface topographies, including higher order resonant conditions.' If correct, Eq. (SMSE1) and Eq. (SMSE2) provide explicit, shallow-water-like PDEs that capture MMSE scattering behavior without solving k = k tanh(kh) implicitly at each point.

Load-bearing premise

The derivation in Section II B truncates the Lagrange/Taylor expansion of the dispersion relation at first order in νh and substitutes it directly into the differential operator of Eq. (14). This assumes the neglected O((νh)^2) terms remain small throughout the scattering domain. The paper's own Fig. 2 shows the 10% accuracy depth h_max(ν) shrinks rapidly as ν increases, and Fig. 4 admits deviations for 1<kh0<3, so the 'wide range of wave numbers and water depths' claim rests on this unquantified smallness assumption rather than a rigorous error bound.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript derives two explicit approximations, SMSE1 and SMSE2, to Porter's simplified modified mild-slope equation (Eq. 14). In place of the implicit dispersion relation k = k(h,ν), the author uses two truncated explicit expressions, k1 and k2, obtained from a Lagrange/Taylor expansion in νh. The resulting equations have the structure of the linear shallow-water equation with depth- and frequency-dependent coefficients. The paper validates SMSE1 and SMSE2 against the Porter simplified equation and against external benchmarks: the Roseau analytic solution, Booij's full linearized slope problem, Davies and Heathershaw's sinusoidal ripple experiments, and Kirby and Anton's artificial-bar experiments. The central claim is that the simplified equations replicate the predictions of the modified mild-slope equations over a wide range of wave numbers and topographies, including higher-order Bragg resonances, while avoiding the pointwise solution of the nonlinear dispersion relation.

Significance. If fully substantiated, the contribution is practically useful: SMSE1 and SMSE2 are explicit, shallow-water-like PDEs that avoid both the implicit dispersion solve and the higher-order bathymetry-derivative terms of the full MMSE. The derivation is transparent and the four benchmark problems provide a meaningful set of external anchors, including exact and experimental data. The honesty of Fig. 2 in quantifying the shrinking depth range as ν increases is a strength. However, the significance is tempered by the fact that all 'MMSE' comparisons in the validation are against Porter's simplified Eq. (14), not against the full Chamberlain–Porter Eq. (5), so the abstract's claim of replicating 'the modified mild slope equations' is only partially demonstrated. The lack of a quantitative error bound for the truncation in νh also leaves the 'wide range' claim unquantified.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section III, Figs. 4, 5, 7, 9, 10; Section II A] The numerical validation compares SMSE1 and SMSE2 exclusively against Eq. (14), the Porter simplified form that drops the v(h)(∇h)^2 term, rather than against the full Chamberlain–Porter MMSE of Eq. (5). The manuscript states in Section II A that it will use 'MMSE' interchangeably for Eqs. (5) and (14), but those two equations are not identical: Eq. (14) neglects a term that depends on slope and curvature, and the paper does not quantify the difference between Eqs. (5) and (14) for the Roseau, Booij, ripple, and bar topographies. Because the abstract claims that the simplified equations 'replicate the predictions of the modified mild slope equations', this omission is load-bearing. I request that at least the Roseau and Booij cases be recomputed with Eq. (5) and the differences reported, or that the claims be explicitly restricted to Porter's simplified Eq. (14).
  2. [Section II B, Eqs. (15)–(16); Fig. 2] The expansions for k1 and k2 are truncated at first order in νh with no remainder estimate. Figure 2 shows that the 10% wave-number accuracy threshold h_max(ν) decreases rapidly with ν—for ν=3 the range is only 0<h<0.35—and Section III A admits visible deviations for 1<kh0<3. This undercuts the abstract's 'wide range of wave numbers and water depths' claim. The author should either provide a rigorous error bound for the truncation, or state the parameter range in terms of νh (and, for the PDE, bathymetric slope) within which the approximation is intended to be accurate, with a defined tolerance.
  3. [Section III A, Fig. 4] The statement that 'there is virtually no discernible difference' between SMSE1, SMSE2, and the MMSE for the Roseau problem is based on visual inspection of a single figure. In the admitted range 1<kh0<3, the deviations could be substantial for practical purposes. Please report the maximum relative error in |R| or in the complex coefficients R and T over the plotted kh0 range, so the reader can assess the magnitude of the disagreement, rather than relying on visual indistinguishability.
  4. [Section III C and III D, Figs. 7, 9, 10] The agreement between SMSE1/SMSE2 and the MMSE at the higher-order Bragg resonances is shown only graphically, without any numerical error measure or grid-convergence information. Since one of the paper's main claims is the capture of 'higher order resonant conditions', I request a quantitative comparison (for example, the relative error in |R| at the 2k/ℓ=2 peaks) and a brief statement that the numerical solutions are converged with respect to grid resolution.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract and Introduction] The phrase 'analytic intractable' should be 'analytically intractable'.
  2. [Section II B] 'Langrange's theorem' should be 'Lagrange's theorem'; in addition, the expansion variable and the order of the omitted terms in Eq. (15) should be stated explicitly so that 'leading order' is unambiguous.
  3. [Section II A, Eq. (13)] The statement that η≈ζ in the shallow water limit is made without derivation; a one-line justification would be helpful.
  4. [Section III A, Fig. 4 caption] The caption refers to 'Eqn. (14)' as the MMSE, while the text elsewhere uses 'MMSE' more loosely; each figure caption should specify whether the plotted MMSE curve is Eq. (5) or Eq. (14).
  5. [Section IV] The conclusion contains the typo 'oroginal' for 'original'.
  6. [Data availability statement] The statement that data are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request is acceptable, but given the computational nature of the paper, depositing the solver code or tabulated reflection coefficients would improve reproducibility.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: SMSE1/2 are derived from a Taylor expansion of the dispersion relation substituted into Porter's Eq. (14), with no fitted parameters, no self-citations, and independent external benchmarks.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. SMSE1 and SMSE2 are constructed by taking a truncated Taylor expansion of the implicit dispersion relation k = k(h, nu) and substituting the resulting explicit approximation into Porter's simplified MMSE, Eq. (14). This is a direct analytic approximation of one equation by another; it is not a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction, and no parameter is tuned to any dataset. The paper's numerical validations compare SMSE1/2 against Eq. (14), the exact Roseau solution, Booij's full linearized results, and the Davies-Heathershaw and Kirby-Anton experimental data, so the key scattering predictions are independently anchored. The only caveat is terminological: the paper states 'we will use the term MMSE to refer interchangeably to either Eqn. (5) or (14)', and the numerical MMSE comparisons use Eq. (14) rather than the full Chamberlain-Porter Eq. (5) with the r(h) terms. This is a validation-scope limitation for the abstract's 'replicate the predictions of the modified mild slope equations' claim, but it does not make the derivation circular because Eq. (14) is explicitly the starting point of the derivation and the same simplified equations are also checked against external benchmarks. No self-citation chain is load-bearing, no uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors' prior work, and no known result is merely renamed.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted to data. The derivation relies on standard linear water wave theory, on Porter's simplified MMSE as a reference, and on the validity of depth-averaged mild-slope modeling for the benchmark bathymetries. No new entities are postulated.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Linear water wave theory with Laplace's equation and the free surface and bottom boundary conditions (Eqs. 1-3) governs the benchmark 'ground truth' cases.
    All reference solutions, including Booij's linearized results and experimental data, are interpreted within this standard framework.
  • domain assumption Porter's equation ∇·(k^{-2}∇ζ)+ζ=0 (Eq. 14) is an accurate surrogate for the full Chamberlain-Porter MMSE (Eq. 5) in the tested regimes.
    The paper uses Eq. 14 as the reference MMSE in all validations and only invokes Porter's published argument that the dropped v(h) term is small; it does not evaluate r(h) from Eq. 5.
  • standard math The Lagrange inversion theorem applies to the dispersion relation ν=k tanh(kh), justifying the Taylor expansion in Eq. 15.
    The expansion of the inverse function k(h,ν) is the mathematical basis for both SMSE1 and SMSE2.
  • domain assumption Depth-averaged mild-slope models remain valid for the bathymetries in the benchmark problems (mild to moderate slopes, no wave breaking).
    The entire comparison against MMSE presupposes that mild-slope modeling is appropriate for Roseau, Booij, ripple, and bar topographies.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Novel Approximation of the Modified Mild Slope Equation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/EYPDQMJN

@misc{pith2026250619854,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Novel Approximation of the Modified Mild Slope Equation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/EYPDQMJN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.19854}
}
read the original abstract

The mild-slope equation and its various modifications aim to model, with varying degrees of success, linear water wave propagation over sloping or undulating seabed topography. However, despite multiple modifications and attempted simplifications, the different variants of the equation include multiple higher order terms involving the nonlinear water wave dispersion relation and thus remain analytic intractable. To further facilitate its use, we derive a drastically simplified alternative version of the modified mild-slope equation that bears striking resemblance to the linear shallow water equation while retaining all critical features of the original equation that enable it to be valid for a wide range of wave numbers and water depths. Direct comparison of the modified mild-slope equation and our simplified formulation indicates that the simplified equations agree with the modified mild slope equation at leading orders in the forcing frequency and local depth. Validations with multiple sets of benchmark wave scattering problems demonstrate that despite the clearly reduced complexity, the simplified equations were able to replicate the predictions of the modified mild slope equations over a wide range of wave numbers and surface topographies, including higher order resonant conditions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.19854 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: Comparison of the two different simplified approximations [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: Maximal height [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3: Limited portion of surface bedform for Roseau’s problem parametrized by Eqns. (17) and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (7 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Reflection coefficient for the scattering problem over Roseau’s profile as a function of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Reflection coefficient for the scattering problem over planar slope (Booij) as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Sinusoidal ripple bed for wave scattering experiment by Davies and Heathershaw [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: Reflection coefficient magnitude [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: Artificial bars in Kirby and Anton’s scattering experiment. Sketch reproduced from Kirby [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9: Reflection coefficient magnitude [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10: Reflection coefficient magnitude [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_10.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

43 extracted references · 36 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    merlin.mbs aapmrev4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked

    FUNCTION id.bst "merlin.mbs aapmrev4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked" ENTRY address archive archivePrefix author bookaddress booktitle chapter collaboration doi edition editor eid eprint howpublished institution isbn issn journal key language month note number organization pages primaryClass publisher school SLACcitation series title translat...

    2010

  2. [2]

    merlin.mbs aipauth4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked

    FUNCTION id.bst "merlin.mbs aipauth4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked" ENTRY address archive archivePrefix author bookaddress booktitle chapter collaboration doi edition editor eid eprint howpublished institution isbn issn journal key language month note number organization pages primaryClass publisher school SLACcitation series title translat...

    2010

  3. [3]

    merlin.mbs aipnum4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked

    FUNCTION id.bst "merlin.mbs aipnum4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked" ENTRY address archive archivePrefix author bookaddress booktitle chapter collaboration doi edition editor eid eprint howpublished institution isbn issn journal key language month note number organization pages primaryClass publisher school SLACcitation series title translati...

    2010

  4. [4]

    merlin.mbs apsrev4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked

    FUNCTION id.bst "merlin.mbs apsrev4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked" ENTRY address archive archivePrefix author bookaddress booktitle chapter collaboration doi edition editor eid eprint howpublished institution isbn issn journal key language month note number organization pages primaryClass publisher school SLACcitation series title translati...

    2010

  5. [5]

    merlin.mbs apsrmp4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked

    FUNCTION id.bst "merlin.mbs apsrmp4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked" ENTRY address archive archivePrefix author bookaddress booktitle chapter collaboration doi edition editor eid eprint howpublished institution isbn issn journal key language month note number organization pages primaryClass publisher school SLACcitation series title translati...

    2010

  6. [6]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address author booktitle chapter edition editor howpublished institution journal key month note number organization pages publisher school series title type volume year eprint label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts #0 'before.all := #1 'mid.sentence ...

  7. [7]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 global.max substring 't := if while FUNCTION word.in bbl.in capitalize " " * FUNCT...

  8. [8]

    author author R. G. \ Dean \ and\ author R. A. \ Dalrymple ,\ @noop title Water wave mechanics for engineers and scientists ,\ Vol. volume 2 \ ( publisher world scientific publishing company ,\ year 1991 ) NoStop

    work page 1991

Show all 43 references
  1. [9]

    author author M. W. \ Dingemans ,\ @noop title Water wave propagation over uneven bottoms (in 2 parts) ,\ Vol. volume 13 \ ( publisher World Scientific ,\ year 1997 ) NoStop

    1997

  2. [10]

    Li \ and\ author C

    author author Y. Li \ and\ author C. C. \ Mei ,\ title title Bragg scattering by a line array of small cylinders in a waveguide. part 1. linear aspects , \ @noop journal journal Journal of Fluid Mechanics \ volume 583 ,\ pages 161--187 ( year 2007 ) NoStop

    2007

  3. [11]

    Garnaud \ and\ author C

    author author X. Garnaud \ and\ author C. C. \ Mei ,\ title title Bragg scattering and wave-power extraction by an array of small buoys , \ @noop journal journal Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences \ volume 466 ,\ pages 79--106 (...

    2010

  4. [12]

    author author C. C. \ Mei , author M. A. \ Stiassnie , \ and\ author D. K.-P. \ Yue ,\ @noop title Theory and applications of ocean surface waves: Part 1: linear aspects \ ( publisher World Scientific ,\ year 2005 ) NoStop

    2005

  5. [13]

    author author K. O. \ Friedrichs ,\ title title Waves on a shallow sloping beach , \ @noop journal journal Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics \ volume 1 ,\ pages 109--134 ( year 1948 ) NoStop

    1948

  6. [14]

    author author J. J. \ Stoker ,\ @noop title Water waves: The mathematical theory with applications \ ( publisher Courier Dover Publications ,\ year 2019 ) NoStop

    2019

  7. [15]

    author author D. H. \ Peregrine ,\ title title Long waves on a beach , \ @noop journal journal Journal of fluid mechanics \ volume 27 ,\ pages 815--827 ( year 1967 ) NoStop

    1967

  8. [16]

    author author M. Brocchini ,\ title title A reasoned overview on boussinesq-type models: the interplay between physics, mathematics and numerics , \ @noop journal journal Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences \ volume 469 ,\ pages ...

    2013

  9. [17]

    author author Q. Chen ,\ title title Fully nonlinear boussinesq-type equations for waves and currents over porous beds , \ @noop journal journal Journal of Engineering Mechanics \ volume 132 ,\ pages 220--230 ( year 2006 ) NoStop

    2006

  10. [18]

    Shi , author J

    author author F. Shi , author J. T. \ Kirby , author J. C. \ Harris , author J. D. \ Geiman , \ and\ author S. T. \ Grilli ,\ title title A high-order adaptive time-stepping tvd solver for boussinesq modeling of breaking waves and coastal inundation , \ @noop journal journal O...

    2012

  11. [19]

    Liu , author Y

    author author W. Liu , author Y. Liu , \ and\ author X. Zhao ,\ title title Numerical study of bragg reflection of regular water waves over fringing reefs based on a boussinesq model , \ @noop journal journal Ocean Engineering \ volume 190 ,\ pages 106415 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    2019

  12. [20]

    Xiong , author S

    author author Y. Xiong , author S. Tang , \ and\ author L. Zhu ,\ title title Improved boussinesq-type equations for flexural-gravity waves , \ @noop journal journal Physics of Fluids \ volume 37 ( year 2025 ) NoStop

    2025

  13. [21]

    author author J. C. \ Berkhoff ,\ title title Computation of combined refraction—diffraction , \ in\ @noop booktitle Coastal Engineering 1972 \ ( year 1973 )\ pp.\ pages 471--490 NoStop

    1972

  14. [22]

    author author J. C. W. \ Berkhoff ,\ title title Mathematical models for simple harmonic linear water waves: wave diffraction and refraction , \ @noop journal journal Ph. D. Thesis \ ( year 1976 ) NoStop

    1976

  15. [23]

    Smith \ and\ author T

    author author R. Smith \ and\ author T. Sprinks ,\ title title Scattering of surface waves by a conical island , \ @noop journal journal Journal of Fluid Mechanics \ volume 72 ,\ pages 373--384 ( year 1975 ) NoStop

    1975

  16. [24]

    author author J. T. \ Kirby ,\ title title A general wave equation for waves over rippled beds , \ @noop journal journal Journal of Fluid Mechanics \ volume 162 ,\ pages 171--186 ( year 1986 ) NoStop

    1986

  17. [25]

    author author J. Miles ,\ title title Variational approximations for gravity waves in water of variable depth , \ @noop journal journal Journal of Fluid Mechanics \ volume 232 ,\ pages 681--688 ( year 1991 ) NoStop

    1991

  18. [26]

    Chamberlain \ and\ author D

    author author P. Chamberlain \ and\ author D. Porter ,\ title title The modified mild-slope equation , \ @noop journal journal Journal of Fluid Mechanics \ volume 291 ,\ pages 393--407 ( year 1995 a ) NoStop

    1995

  19. [27]

    Porter ,\ title title The mild-slope equations , \ @noop journal journal Journal of Fluid Mechanics \ volume 494 ,\ pages 51--63 ( year 2003 ) NoStop

    author author D. Porter ,\ title title The mild-slope equations , \ @noop journal journal Journal of Fluid Mechanics \ volume 494 ,\ pages 51--63 ( year 2003 ) NoStop

    2003

  20. [28]

    Porter ,\ title title The mild-slope equations: a unified theory , \ @noop journal journal Journal of Fluid Mechanics \ volume 887 ,\ pages A29 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    author author D. Porter ,\ title title The mild-slope equations: a unified theory , \ @noop journal journal Journal of Fluid Mechanics \ volume 887 ,\ pages A29 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    2020

  21. [29]

    \ Hsu , author L.-H

    author author T.-W. \ Hsu , author L.-H. \ Tsai , \ and\ author Y.-T. \ Huang ,\ title title Bragg scattering of water waves by multiply composite artificial bars , \ @noop journal journal Coastal Engineering Journal \ volume 45 ,\ pages 235--253 ( year 2003 ) NoStop

    2003

  22. [30]

    author author J. W. \ Kim \ and\ author K. J. \ Bai ,\ title title A new complementary mild-slope equation , \ @noop journal journal Journal of fluid Mechanics \ volume 511 ,\ pages 25--40 ( year 2004 ) NoStop

    2004

  23. [31]

    Davies \ and\ author A

    author author A. Davies \ and\ author A. Heathershaw ,\ title title Surface-wave propagation over sinusoidally varying topography , \ @noop journal journal Journal of Fluid Mechanics \ volume 144 ,\ pages 419--443 ( year 1984 ) NoStop

    1984

  24. [32]

    author author J. T. \ Kirby \ and\ author J. P. \ Anton ,\ title title Bragg reflection of waves by artificial bars , \ in\ @noop booktitle Coastal Engineering 1990 \ ( publisher American Society of Civil Engineers ,\ year 1990 )\ pp.\ pages 757--768 NoStop

    1990

  25. [33]

    Chamberlain \ and\ author D

    author author P. Chamberlain \ and\ author D. Porter ,\ title title Decomposition methods for wave scattering by topography with application to ripple beds , \ @noop journal journal Wave Motion \ volume 22 ,\ pages 201--214 ( year 1995 b ) NoStop

    1995

  26. [34]

    \ Liu , author J

    author author H.-W. \ Liu , author J. Yang , \ and\ author P. Lin ,\ title title An analytic solution to the modified mild-slope equation for wave propagation over one-dimensional piecewise smooth topographies , \ @noop journal journal Wave Motion \ volume 49 ,\ pages 445--460...

    2012

  27. [35]

    \ Liu , author D.-J

    author author H.-W. \ Liu , author D.-J. \ Fu , \ and\ author X.-L. \ Sun ,\ title title Analytic solution to the modified mild-slope equation for reflection by a rectangular breakwater with scour trenches , \ @noop journal journal Journal of Engineering Mechanics \ volume 139...

    2013

  28. [36]

    \ Liu , author H.-D

    author author H.-W. \ Liu , author H.-D. \ Zeng , \ and\ author H.-D. \ Huang ,\ title title Bragg resonant reflection of surface waves from deep water to shallow water by a finite array of trapezoidal bars , \ @noop journal journal Applied Ocean Research \ volume 94 ,\ pages ...

    2020

  29. [37]

    \ Liu , author W.-J

    author author H.-W. \ Liu , author W.-J. \ Xie , author J.-J. \ Xie , \ and\ author D. Ning ,\ title title Zero reflections of water surface gravity waves induced by a finite periodic array of artificial bars , \ @noop journal journal Physics of Fluids \ volume 37 ( year 2025 ) NoStop

    2025

  30. [38]

    \ Liu \ and\ author X.-M

    author author H.-W. \ Liu \ and\ author X.-M. \ Zhou ,\ title title Explicit modified mild-slope equation for wave scattering by piecewise monotonic and piecewise smooth bathymetries , \ @noop journal journal Journal of Engineering Mathematics \ volume 87 ,\ pages 29--45 ( yea...

    2014

  31. [39]

    Porter ,\ title title An extended linear shallow-water equation , \ @noop journal journal Journal of Fluid Mechanics \ volume 876 ,\ pages 413--427 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    author author R. Porter ,\ title title An extended linear shallow-water equation , \ @noop journal journal Journal of Fluid Mechanics \ volume 876 ,\ pages 413--427 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    2019

  32. [40]

    author author J. L. \ Lagrange ,\ @noop title Nouvelle m \'e thode pour r \'e soudre les \'e quations litt \'e rales par le moyen des s \'e ries \ ( publisher Chez Haude et Spener, Libraires de la Cour & de l'Acad \'e mie royale ,\ year 1770 ) NoStop

  33. [41]

    Booij ,\ title title A note on the accuracy of the mild-slope equation , \ @noop journal journal Coastal Engineering \ volume 7 ,\ pages 191--203 ( year 1983 ) NoStop

    author author N. Booij ,\ title title A note on the accuracy of the mild-slope equation , \ @noop journal journal Coastal Engineering \ volume 7 ,\ pages 191--203 ( year 1983 ) NoStop

    1983

  34. [42]

    Roseau ,\ @noop title Asymptotic wave theory ,\ Vol

    author author M. Roseau ,\ @noop title Asymptotic wave theory ,\ Vol. volume 20 \ ( publisher Elsevier ,\ year 2012 ) NoStop

    2012

  35. [43]

    author author J. W. \ Miles ,\ title title Oblique surface-wave diffraction by a cylindrical obstacle , \ @noop journal journal Dynamics of Atmospheres and Oceans \ volume 6 ,\ pages 121--123 ( year 1981 ) NoStop

    1981

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.