Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 2 cited by

JWST Observations of Photo-dissociation Regions. II. Aliphatic/Aromatic Carbonaceous Dust, Ices, and Gas Phase Spectral Line Inventory

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read JWST spectra of two star-forming clouds show deuterium preferentially replaces hydrogen in aliphatic carbon bonds, at 3–10 times the aromatic rate.

desk verdict New JWST PDR data of real value, but the deuterium fractions and 'complete removal' claim carry more model dependence than the abstract admits. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.20468 v2 pith:D2PWHE2K submitted 2025-06-25 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.SR

K. Misselt , A.N. Witt , K.D. Gordon , D. Van De Putte , B. Trahin , A. Abergel , A. Noriega-Crespo , P. Guillard
show 5 more authors
M. Zannese P. Dell'ova M. Baes P. Klaassen N. Ysard
This is my paper
classification astro-ph.GAastro-ph.SR
keywords photo-dissociationregionsJWSTspectroscopycarbonaceousdustaliphaticC-HbondsaromaticdeuteriumfractionationHorseheadnebulaNGC7023
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper presents a spatially resolved spectral inventory of two benchmark photo-dissociation regions, the Horsehead nebula and the NW filament of NGC 7023, using JWST IFU spectroscopy from 0.97 to 28 µm at physical resolutions down to about 50 AU. Its central new result is an asymmetry in how carbonaceous dust responds to ultraviolet radiation: aliphatic (chain-like) carbon–hydrogen bonds are destroyed faster than aromatic (ring-like) bonds at the cloud edge, yet where aliphatic bonds survive, deuterium substitution into them is far more efficient, with $N_D/N_H \sim 0.1$–$0.3$ versus $\sim 0.03$ for aromatic bonds. The paper also confirms spectroscopically that the photo-evaporative outflow from the Horsehead PDR carries only aromatic carriers, with no detectable aliphatic 3.4 µm emission. If correct, these findings give observers a direct infrared tracer of deuterium fractionation in dust and a sharp spatial diagnostic of UV processing across PDR fronts.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the 3–5 µm spectral complex of carbonaceous emission: the aromatic C–H stretch at 3.3 µm, the aliphatic C–H stretch at 3.4 µm with its red plateau, and their deuterated counterparts at roughly 4.4 µm (aromatic C–D) and 4.7 µm (aliphatic C–D). The argument proceeds by decomposing region-averaged and per-spaxel spectra into a polynomial continuum plus Drude profiles, mapping the 3.4/3.3 ratio across the front at roughly 100 AU resolution, and converting the observed 4.4/3.3 and 4.7/3.4 intensity ratios into $N_D/N_H$ using theoretical intrinsic band strengths for PAH-like carriers with aliphatic side groups.

What would settle it

A laboratory measurement of the intrinsic C–D stretch band strength for the actual aliphatic carrier (for example hydrogenated amorphous carbon with alkane side chains) at interstellar temperatures, combined with a high-resolution spectrum that separates the 4.7 µm feature from CO ro-vibrational lines and CO ice absorption, would settle whether the reported $N_D/N_H \sim 0.1$–$0.3$ is real or an artifact of band-strength and blending assumptions.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper establishes, from JWST NIRSpec and MIRI IFU spectra of the Horsehead and NGC 7023 PDRs, that aliphatic and aromatic carbonaceous carriers respond differently to the UV field and that deuterium uptake marks the difference. At the Horsehead front, the 3.3 µm aromatic C–H feature continues into the H ii region while the 3.4 µm aliphatic feature drops to zero just inside the front, showing that the outflow is purely aromatic and that exposure to even moderate UV removes aliphatic bonds. In the more shielded regions of both objects, the aliphatic-to-aromatic bond ratio is roughly constant at $\sim 0.2$, but the deuterated fractions differ systematically: $N_D/N_H \sim 0.1$–$0.3$ for aliphatic bonds versus $\sim 0.03$ for aromatic bonds, and no 4.4 µm aromatic C–D feature is detected in the Horsehead at all. The absence of gas-phase HD lines, together with the high deuterium fraction in the carbonaceous bonds, is presented as consistent with the energetics by which deuterium replaces H in C–H bonds and catalyzes H$_2$ formation.

Load-bearing premise

The $N_D/N_H$ ratios in Table 6 assume that the 4.4 and 4.7 µm bands are C–D stretching modes and that the theoretical intrinsic band strengths, computed for PAH-like carriers with aliphatic side groups, apply to the actual interstellar carriers; if those band strengths or identifications are systematically wrong, the quantitative ratios change or collapse.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Aliphatic C–H bonds act as a sensitive UV dosimeter: their disappearance at the PDR front marks the transition from shielded to unshielded material before the aromatic emission fades.
  • The 3.4 µm aliphatic feature can be used to isolate the photo-evaporative component of PDR outflows; its absence identifies outflows that have been stripped of aliphatic carriers.
  • Deuterium fractionation in carbonaceous dust is observable in the infrared: the 4.4 and 4.7 µm C–D bands offer a way to map $N_D/N_H$ in PDRs and, by extension, to test models of interstellar deuterium chemistry.
  • The measured line-contribution fractions in the JWST NIRCam and MIRI filters allow imaging-only studies to correct for line contamination in PDRs with similar physical conditions.
  • Ice formation (H$_2$O, CO$_2$, CO) begins in the deeper, more shielded regions of NGC 7023, providing a spatial link between the destruction of aliphatic bonds at the front and the freeze-out of volatiles behind it.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the aliphatic C–D bond is as robust as the energetics suggest, deuterated aliphatic carriers could survive farther into H ii regions than their hydrogenated counterparts, so the 4.7 µm band may trace processed dust even where the 3.4 µm band has vanished.
  • The absence of the 4.4 µm aromatic C–D feature in the Horsehead, at a column where NGC 7023 shows it, hints that aromatic deuteration depends on the hardness of the radiation field or on the formation history of the carriers; a test would be to observe a PDR with an intermediate UV hardness.
  • The reported correlation of the 3.4–3.6 µm plateau with the aliphatic rather than the aromatic band, opposite to an earlier study, suggests the plateau carrier may be a separate aliphatic-rich population; separating its spatial profile from the main 3.4 µm band would settle the assignment.
  • The same 4.7 µm spectral window contains CO ro-vibrational lines and CO ice absorption, so future higher-resolution observations that resolve the C–D band from CO would directly test whether part of the inferred aliphatic deuterium fraction is actually CO emission.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper presents an overview of JWST GTO 1192 NIRSpec and MIRI IFU observations of the Horsehead and NGC 7023 NW PDRs, including data reduction, cross-calibration, region extraction, line identification, and an inventory of atomic, H2, CH+, CO, and ice features. The analysis focuses on the 3-5 μm carbonaceous emission: it confirms the entrainment of 3.3 μm aromatic carriers in the Horsehead photo-evaporative outflow, finds no 3.4 μm aliphatic emission there, and interprets this as complete removal of aliphatic bonds. It also reports detections of the 4.4 and 4.7 μm features attributed to aromatic and aliphatic C-D stretching modes and derives ND/NH ~0.1-0.3 for aliphatics versus ~0.03 for aromatics using theoretical band strengths from Yang et al. (2020) and Yang & Li (2023b).

Significance. The dataset and the public line and spectrum tables are a valuable community resource; the cross-calibration against JWST imaging is careful, and the per-spaxel treatment of the 3.3/3.4 μm bands demonstrates spatial resolution of hydrocarbon processing at the ~100 au scale. If the aliphatic destruction and deuterium fractionation claims hold, they provide new, spatially resolved constraints on carbonaceous dust evolution in PDRs and on deuterium incorporation into C-H bonds. The paper is appropriately cautious in the body about carrier identification (Sect. 1) and about the plateau origin, but the abstract's headline numbers inherit external model dependencies and blend uncertainties that are not fully propagated.

major comments (4)
  1. [§4.5.1, Fig. 15] The abstract's statement that the outflow is 'purely aromatic' and that there is 'complete removal of aliphatic bonds' is based on scaling the DF1 spectrum by a hand-selected factor of 0.28 to match the 3.3 μm feature and then visually asserting that 3.4 μm emission is absent. No quantitative upper limit on I(3.4) in the H ii region is provided, and the uncertainty in the 0.28 scaling factor is not propagated. A formal non-detection limit, together with a discussion of whether size-selective entrainment could produce the same 3.3-only appearance, is needed before 'complete removal' can be stated.
  2. [§4.5.3, Table 6, Sect. 1] The ND/NH values in Table 6 are converted from observed intensity ratios using intrinsic C-D/C-H band strengths from Yang et al. (2020) and Yang & Li (2023b), which assume an underlying PAH structure with aliphatic side groups. Section 1 explicitly declines to identify the carriers as PAHs and leaves disordered a-C(:H) materials as an open possibility. If the true carriers are not PAH-like, the adopted band strengths do not apply, and the absolute D/H ratios, and possibly the claimed aliphatic-over-aromatic preference, change. The paper should either justify the PAH-based band strengths for these specific PDR carriers or present the D/H numbers as model-dependent and temper the abstract accordingly.
  3. [§4.4, §4.5.3, Fig. 12, Table 6] The 4.4 μm aromatic C-D feature used for the NGC 7023 MOL and DF3 entries in Table 6 (central wavelength ~4.38 μm, width ~0.1 μm) overlaps the 13CO2 ice absorption at ~4.39 μm identified in exactly those regions in Sect. 4.4. The extraction described in Sect. 4.5.3 does not state how this blend was separated, so the shielded-region aromatic ND/NH values (0.028 and 0.027) may be contaminated by the ice feature. A decomposition of the 13CO2 component, or an explicit uncertainty term for this blend, must be added before those points can support the conclusion that aromatic deuteration is less efficient.
  4. [§4.5.3] The suggestion of a reduced aromatic deuteration efficiency in the Horsehead relative to NGC 7023 rests on a non-detection of the 4.4 μm feature in all Horsehead regions, combined with an assumed detection threshold. Because the 4.4 μm feature is weak even in NGC 7023 (0.11-0.48 in the units of Table 6, with 1σ errors of 0.02-0.13), the Horsehead absence should be reported as a quantitative upper limit with an explicitly stated detection threshold rather than a qualitative efficiency difference.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract] The term 'Disassociation Regions' should read 'Dissociation Regions'.
  2. [Fig. 1 caption] The caption begins with 'Extractions regions on images'; this should be 'Extraction regions on images'.
  3. [Tables 2 and 3] The label 'HIIb' in the Horsehead sections is typographically inconsistent with the 'H ii' notation used throughout the text and should be unified.
  4. [§4.5.2, Table 6] The text states that the aliphatic fraction is roughly constant at ~0.15-0.25 in both objects, but Table 6 contains Horsehead DF2 at 0.274±0.049 and NGC 7023 DF3 at 0.233±0.041; the quoted range should be reconciled with these values or explicitly described as a typical range.
  5. [Eq. (2)] The symbol Cλ is used both for extinction in Eq. (2) and for continuum flux in Eq. (A.1); a different symbol for one of the two quantities would remove ambiguity.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No circular derivation: the paper's quantitative claims are measured intensities converted with external theoretical band strengths, and its outflow-composition claim is a direct spectroscopic comparison.

full rationale

The paper does not derive its headline results from its own inputs. The deuterium fractions ND/NH in Table 6 are obtained by converting observed 3.3/4.4 and 3.4/4.7 micron intensity ratios into column ratios using intrinsic band strengths from Yang et al. (2020) and Yang & Li (2023b), which are external theoretical calculations and not fitted to the present data. The claim that the Horsehead outflow is purely aromatic is based on a direct comparison of the H ii and DF1 spectra (Fig. 15), where the 3.4 micron aliphatic feature is absent after scaling the 3.3 micron aromatic bands to match; this is an observational inference, not a prediction from a fitted model. The paper does cite companion works from the same program (e.g., Abergel et al. 2024) for the prior discovery of the outflow, but the spectroscopic confirmation and compositional analysis stand independently on the JWST data presented here. The potential systematic uncertainties noted by a skeptical reader—PAH-specific band strengths and possible 13CO2 ice blending near 4.4 microns—are concerns about accuracy and model dependence, not circularity: the derivation does not assume its own conclusion. Accordingly, no circular step meets the evidentiary bar of the analysis, and the appropriate score is 1, reflecting only the presence of self-citations that are not load-bearing for the central derivation.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities. Its quantitative claims rest on standard feature identifications and on theoretical band strengths from Yang et al. (2020) and Yang & Li (2023b) for converting band intensity ratios into ND/NH. The outflow comparison uses a hand-set scaling factor of 0.28. These are the main externally supplied or hand-chosen inputs; the paper itself provides the measured spectra and line lists.

free parameters (4)
  • DF1-to-HII scaling factor = 0.28
    Hand-set so that the 3.3 µm aromatic band matches between DF1 and HII in Fig. 15; used to argue that 3.4 µm aliphatic emission would be detectable if present in the same proportion.
  • NIRSpec flux scaling factor = 0.87
    Multiplicative calibration factor derived from NIRCam/IFU cross-calibration (Sect. 2.3); applied to all NIRSpec spectra and affects absolute band strengths, though not the relative ratios used for most conclusions.
  • Foreground extinction E(B-V) = 0.05
    Assumed foreground reddening toward sigma Orionis for the H I line ratio analysis (Sect. 4.1), from Brown et al. (1994).
  • Number of Drude profiles in spectral decomposition = 8
    The 3-5 µm region spectra were decomposed into a polynomial continuum plus eight Drude profiles at fixed central wavelengths (Sect. 4.5.2); profile amplitudes are fit to data.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The 3.3 and 3.4 µm emission features trace column densities of aromatic and aliphatic C-H bonds, respectively, and are optically thin.
    Used throughout Sect. 4.5 to convert measured band intensities into relative bond abundances and to compare DF1 with the HII outflow.
  • domain assumption The 4.4 and 4.7 µm features are the deuterated counterparts of the 3.3 and 3.4 µm C-H stretches, with intrinsic band strengths adopted from Yang et al. (2020) and Yang & Li (2023b).
    This identification and calibration underlies the ND/NH ratios in Table 6 and the abstract's headline D/H numbers (Sect. 4.5.3).
  • domain assumption The aromatic carriers in the outflow are the same population as those in DF1, so scaling the DF1 spectrum by 0.28 to match the 3.3 µm feature provides a valid baseline for comparing the 3.4 µm feature.
    This is the basis for the conclusion that aliphatic emission is absent in the outflow (Sect. 4.5.1, Fig. 15).
  • standard math Case B recombination theory at Te = 10000 K and ne = 1000 cm-3 applies to the observed H I lines used for extinction estimates.
    Used in Eq. 2 in Sect. 4.1 to derive internal visual extinction; the authors note the Case B ratio has small dependence on conditions.
  • domain assumption A screen-like geometry with no mixing of dust and emitting gas is a reasonable approximation for the extinction estimates.
    Acknowledged in Sect. 4.1 as a limitation; true dust column may be higher.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of JWST Observations of Photo-dissociation Regions. II. Aliphatic/Aromatic Carbonaceous Dust, Ices, and Gas Phase Spectral Line Inventory." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/D2PWHE2K

@misc{pith2026250620468,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: JWST Observations of Photo-dissociation Regions. II. Aliphatic/Aromatic Carbonaceous Dust, Ices, and Gas Phase Spectral Line Inventory},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/D2PWHE2K}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.20468}
}
abstract

This paper provides an overview of the spectroscopic data obtained by the JWST Guaranteed Time Observations (GTO) program 1192, "The Physics and Chemistry of PDR Fronts", including an inventory of the spatially resolved dust, gas, and molecular content in the Horsehead nebula and the NW filament of NGC~7023. We demonstrate the unique capability of this high spatial resolution data set to elucidate the evolution of gas and dust at the interface between stars and their natal clouds at the scale at which the physics and chemistry occur. The Disassociation Regions (PDRs) in the Horsehead nebula and the North West (NW) filament of NGC 7023 were mapped with a spectral resolution 1000-3000 and a spatial resolution of ~2e-4 pc between 0.97-28um. Spectra extracted from template regions yield a large number of atomic, ionized, and molecular lines. Full line lists and extracted spectra for all 10 regions are provided through CDS. Absorption from H$_2$O, CO$_2$, and CO ices are identified in 3 regions in NGC 7023. In this overview, we have focused on the spectral region between 3 and 5 um which is dominated by emission from aromatic and aliphatic carbon bonds to illustrate the power of the data set. We confirm the entrainment of aromatic carbonaceous species in the photo-evaporative flow from the PDR surface into the H\,{\sc{ii}} region in the Horsehead. No aliphatic emission is present in the outflow, indicating the complete removal of aliphatic bonds when exposed to strong UV fields. There is a clear detection of deuterium substitution in the carbon bonds. Aliphatic D-substitution is more efficient relative to aromatic D-substitution, ranging from N$_{D}$/N$_{H}$ ~ 0.1-0.3 for aliphatics compared to ~0.03 for the aromatics.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.20468 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Extractions regions on images (blue = NRC-F210M, green = NRC-F335M, red = MIR-F770W) of NGC 7023 (left) and the Horsehead (right). The exciting star is off the top of the image in both cases. The color used to designate the regions here will be used in spectral plots for those regions, the remainder of the text. The white dashed rectangles define the minimum (NIRSpec) and maximum (MIRI channel 4) IFU mosaic coverage… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Pseudo long-slit (on G395M; see text) visualization of region definitions for spectral extraction for both NGC 7023 (top) and the Horsehead (bottom). The exciting star is at the top, and the wavelength increases to the right. The origin of the y-axis (depth into the PRD) is defined at (α,δ) = (5 ◦ 40′ 53.11′′ ,−2 ◦ 28′ 6.37′′) and (21◦ 1 ′ 31.82′′ ,68◦ 10′ 23.61′′) for the Horsehead and NGC 7023, respectively. 3.2. … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Spectral extractions from the five regions defined for NGC 7023 over the wavelength range 1.0 < λ < 3.0 µm. Regions are color coded as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (18 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Plot of a narrow wavelength slice of the NIRSpec G140M spectrum in DF1 qualitatively illustrating line identification. The black line is the extracted spectrum, green the Gaussian fits to identified lines, and blue the continuum after subtracting the green fits from th…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Measured line hydrogen line ratios, normalized to Pa α for the 5 regions in the Horsehead. Over plotted in colored lines are the theoretical ratios for a range of temperatures from Prozesky & Smits (2018). All theoretical ratios are computed for a density of 1000 cm−3 …
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Bottom: spatial distribution of AV in the Horsehead IFU footprint as estimated using Eq. 2 with RV = 3.1. Top: Estimates of AV extracted from each region (points) along with a cut-through the spatial distribution map. Error bars on AV for the region extractions are dom…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Plot showing the lines in the pure rotational (0,0) and (1,1) series of H2 (orange and blue, respectively) for the DF1 region of NGC 7023. Identifications in italics with a dashed line were not included in final line lists - the (1,1) S(18,10,8) lines were weak and in …
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Plot showing the lines in the S, Q, and O branches (purple, blue, and orange, respectively) of the H2 (1,0) transitions for the DF1 region of the Horsehead. Identifications in italics with a dashed line were not included in final line lists - Q(9) is blended with the H…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: CH+ ν = 1 → 0 lines detected in NGC 7023. Detection of CH+ lines restricted to DF1 and 2 (green and red) regions. All detected lines are P-branch from 1-8. P(1) is potentially confused with the He i 3D-3Fo multiplet and P(2) blended with the much stronger (0,0)S(14) H2…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Continuum subtracted spectra in the region of promi￾nent CO lines for NGC 7023. Clearly identified transitions are labeled; beyond ∼4.8 µm, the 1-0 and 2-1 P branch transitions overlap and are not resolved at the NIRSpec medium resolution. bend) or ∼13.6 µm (H2O libra…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Plot of NGC 7023 spectra in the wavelength regime around 3 µm. Significant H2O ice absorption is apparent in the MOL and DF3 regions, with a marginal indication in the DF2 region. The DF1 and ATM regions are consistent with no ab￾sorption. Spectra have been normalized…
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Plot of NGC 7023 spectra in the wavelength regime around 4.3 µm. Left: 12CO2 ice absorption at ∼ 4.26 µm is detected in the MOL, DF3, and DF2 regions. Additionally, there is a weak detection of 13CO2 ice absorption at ∼ 4.39 µm in the MOL and DF3 regions. Right: Estim…
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Plot of NGC 7023 spectra in the wavelength regime around 15.2 µm. Left: 12CO2 ice absorption at ∼ 15.2 µm is detected in the MOL and DF3 regions. The spectra are normalized between 14.6 and 14.8 µm. Right: Estimate of the optical depth in the ice absorption band [PIT…
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Plot of NGC 7023 spectra in the wavelength regime around 4.67 µm. Left: Weak 12CO ice absorption at ∼4.67 µm is detected in the MOL and DF3 regions, with a potential shoulder out to 4.68 µm. Right: Estimate of the optical depth in the ice absorption band. region of or…
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: A strong [Arii] line at 6.98527 µm and Pfund￾α at 7.46040 µm contribute 100% of the emission in the MIRI F770W bandpass in the region covered by the H ii IFU extraction (Sect. 3.3) with no detected emission from the 7.7 µm C-C aromatic stretch. In addition, we detect …
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Left: H ii and DF1 extractions around the 3.3-3.4 µm features. The DF1 spectrum has been scaled down by 72% so that the 3.3 µm bands match between the two regions. The F335M filter trace is shown in red. Atomic and molecular line emission contributes 6% and 12% to the…
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Spectra from individual ‘spaxels’ across the PDR front. Colors correspond to distance along the long axis of the IFU mosaic relative to the dissociation front defined in Abergel et al. (2024), with red being deepest into the cloud and purple at the edge of the IFU foo…
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: Left: Feature strength in the 3.4 µm aliphatic feature (red) and 3.3 µm aromatic feature (blue) extracted from per spaxel spectra shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_17.png]
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: Spectra for all region extractions in NGC7023 from 3.1-5.1 µm. Colors are as for the region definitions in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_18.png]
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: As in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_19.png]
Figure 21
Figure 21. Figure 21: Per pixel maps of the aliphatic (3.4 µm) and aromatic (3.3 µm) integrated band strength. Middle panel: aromatic in blue, aliphatic in red. Bottom panel: ratio of aliphatic to aro￾matic band strengths. Top panel: Cuts along the long mosaic axis. Aromatic and aliphatic …

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Infrared spectroscopy of gas-phase hydrogenated and methylated pyrenes: from laboratory spectra to the simulated 3.4 $\mu$m emission band

    astro-ph.GA 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Gas-phase infrared spectra of hydrogenated and methylated pyrenes, combined with a Monte Carlo cooling model, point to 1,2,3,6,7,8-hexahydropyrene as the carrier of the 3.403 μm component of the interstellar 3.4 μm em...

  2. PDRs4All XXII. Near-Infrared continuum in the Orion Bar

    astro-ph.GA 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The near-infrared excess in the Orion Bar decomposes into a ~700 K component correlated with the 3.3 micrometer aromatic band and a weakly constrained hotter component that is not.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

78 extracted references · 30 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    P., et al

    Abergel , A., Teyssier , D., Bernard , J. P., et al. 2003, , 410, 577, 10.1051/0004-6361:20030878

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20030878 2003

  2. [2]

    D., et al

    Abergel , A., Misselt , K., Gordon , K. D., et al. 2024, , 687, A4, 10.1051/0004-6361/202449198

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202449198 2024

  3. [3]

    Anthony-Twarog , B. J. 1982, , 87, 1213, 10.1086/113204

    work page doi:10.1086/113204 1982

  4. [4]

    P., Tollerud , E

    Astropy Collaboration , Robitaille , T. P., Tollerud , E. J., et al. 2013, , 558, A33, 10.1051/0004-6361/201322068

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 2013

  5. [5]

    M., Lim , P

    Astropy Collaboration , Price-Whelan , A. M., Lim , P. L., et al. 2022, , 935, 167, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac7c74

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac7c74 2022

  6. [6]

    J., Esposito , V

    Boersma , C., Allamandola , L. J., Esposito , V. J., et al. 2023, , 959, 74, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad022b

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad022b 2023

  7. [7]

    Boogert , A. C. A., Gerakines , P. A., & Whittet , D. C. B. 2015, , 53, 541, 10.1146/annurev-astro-082214-122348

    doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-082214-122348 2015

  8. [8]

    Boogert , A. C. A., Ehrenfreund , P., Gerakines , P. A., et al. 2000, , 353, 349, 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9909477

    arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.astro-ph/9909477 2000

Show all 78 references
  1. [9]

    Brown , A. G. A., de Geus , E. J., & de Zeeuw , P. T. 1994, , 289, 101, 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9403051

    1994 doi arXiv

  2. [10]

    B., Neufeld , D

    Changala , P. B., Neufeld , D. A., & Godard , B. 2021, , 917, 16, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac05c8

    2021 doi

  3. [11]

    Chokshi , A., Tielens , A. G. G. M., Werner , M. W., & Castelaz , M. W. 1988, , 334, 803, 10.1086/166878

    1988 doi

  4. [12]

    2024, , 685, A75, 10.1051/0004-6361/202346662

    Chown , R., Sidhu , A., Peeters , E., et al. 2024, , 685, A75, 10.1051/0004-6361/202346662

    2024 doi

  5. [13]

    2025, , 698, A86, 10.1051/0004-6361/202452940

    Chown , R., Okada , Y., Peeters , E., et al. 2025, , 698, A86, 10.1051/0004-6361/202452940

    2025 doi

  6. [14]

    F., Ferruit , P., Lobb , D

    Closs , M. F., Ferruit , P., Lobb , D. R., et al. 2008, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 7010, Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2008: Optical, Infrared, and Millimeter, ed. J. M. Oschmann , Jr., M. W. M. de Graauw , & H. ...

    2008 doi

  7. [15]

    2007, , 471, 205, 10.1051/0004-6361:20066172

    Compi \`e gne , M., Abergel , A., Verstraete , L., et al. 2007, , 471, 205, 10.1051/0004-6361:20066172

    2007 doi

  8. [16]

    A., Candian , A., Bern \'e , O., & Tielens , A

    Croiset , B. A., Candian , A., Bern \'e , O., & Tielens , A. G. G. M. 2016, , 590, A26, 10.1051/0004-6361/201527714

    2016 doi

  9. [17]

    D., Candian , A., Mori , T., Onaka , T., & Tielens , A

    Doney , K. D., Candian , A., Mori , T., Onaka , T., & Tielens , A. G. G. M. 2016, , 586, A65, 10.1051/0004-6361/201526809

    2016 doi

  10. [18]

    Draine , B. T. 2006, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 348, Astrophysics in the Far Ultraviolet: Five Years of Discovery with FUSE, ed. G. Sonneborn , H. W. Moos , & B. G. Andersson , 58

    2006

  11. [19]

    T., & Li , A

    Draine , B. T., & Li , A. 2007, , 657, 810, 10.1086/511055

    2007 doi

  12. [20]

    A., et al

    Ehrenfreund , P., Kerkhof , O., Schutte , W. A., et al. 1999, , 350, 240

    1999

  13. [21]

    2024, , Submitted

    El Yajouri , M., Abergel , A., Ysard , N., & et al . 2024, , Submitted

    2024

  14. [22]

    L., Maillard , J

    Field , D., Lemaire , J. L., Maillard , J. P., et al. 2000, Hydrogen in Photodissociation Regions: NGC2023 and NGC7023, ed. F. Combes & G. Pineau des Forets, Cambridge Contemporary Astrophysics (Cambridge University Press), 155–160

    2000

  15. [23]

    J., Cernicharo , J., & Gerin , M

    Fuente , A., Martin-Pintado , J., Rodriguez-Fernandez , N. J., Cernicharo , J., & Gerin , M. 2000, in ESA Special Publication, Vol. 456, ISO Beyond the Peaks: The 2nd ISO Workshop on Analytical Spectroscopy, ed. A. Salama , M. F. Kessler , K. Leech , & B. Schulz , 95

    2000

  16. [24]

    2020, VizieR Online Data Catalog: Gaia EDR3 (Gaia Collaboration, 2020) , VizieR On-line Data Catalog: I/350

    Gaia Collaboration . 2020, VizieR Online Data Catalog: Gaia EDR3 (Gaia Collaboration, 2020) , VizieR On-line Data Catalog: I/350. Originally published in: 2021A&A...649A...1G, 10.26093/cds/vizier.1350

    2020 doi

  17. [25]

    A., Whittet , D

    Gerakines , P. A., Whittet , D. C. B., Ehrenfreund , P., et al. 1999, , 522, 357, 10.1086/307611

    1999 doi

  18. [26]

    Gontcharov , G. A. 2006, Astronomy Letters, 32, 759, 10.1134/S1063773706110065

    2006 doi

  19. [27]

    D., Clayton , G

    Gordon , K. D., Clayton , G. C., Decleir , M., et al. 2023, , 950, 86, 10.3847/1538-4357/accb59

    2023 doi

  20. [28]

    D., Witt , A

    Gordon , K. D., Witt , A. N., Rudy , R. J., et al. 2000, , 544, 859, 10.1086/317245

    2000 doi

  21. [29]

    M., Teyssier , D., & Pety , J

    Habart , E., Abergel , A., Walmsley , C. M., Teyssier , D., & Pety , J. 2005, , 437, 177, 10.1051/0004-6361:20041546

    2005 doi

  22. [30]

    Habing , H. J. 1968, , 19, 421

    1968

  23. [31]

    S., & Draine , B

    Hensley , B. S., & Draine , B. T. 2023, , 948, 55, 10.3847/1538-4357/acc4c2

    2023 doi

  24. [32]

    V., Goicoechea , J

    Hern \'a ndez-Vera , C., Guzm \'a n , V. V., Goicoechea , J. R., et al. 2023, , 677, A152, 10.1051/0004-6361/202347206

    2023 doi

  25. [33]

    J., & Tielens , A

    Hollenbach , D. J., & Tielens , A. G. G. M. 1999, Reviews of Modern Physics, 71, 173, 10.1103/RevModPhys.71.173

    1999 doi

  26. [34]

    M., Bauschlicher , Jr., C

    Hudgins , D. M., Bauschlicher , Jr., C. W., & Sandford , S. A. 2004, , 614, 770, 10.1086/423930

    2004 doi

  27. [35]

    M., Sandford , S

    Hudgins , D. M., Sandford , S. A., Allamandola , L. J., & Tielens , A. G. G. M. 1993, , 86, 713, 10.1086/191796

    1993 doi

  28. [36]

    P., Fanciullo , L., K \"o hler , M., et al

    Jones , A. P., Fanciullo , L., K \"o hler , M., et al. 2013, , 558, A62, 10.1051/0004-6361/201321686

    2013 doi

  29. [37]

    P., & Ysard , N

    Jones , A. P., & Ysard , N. 2022, , 657, A128, 10.1051/0004-6361/202141793

    2022 doi

  30. [38]

    V., Scholz , R

    Kharchenko , N. V., Scholz , R. D., Piskunov , A. E., R \"o ser , S., & Schilbach , E. 2007, Astronomische Nachrichten, 328, 889, 10.1002/asna.200710776

    2007 doi

  31. [39]

    2014, , 569, A109, 10.1051/0004-6361/201322711

    K \"o hler , M., Habart , E., Arab , H., et al. 2014, , 569, A109, 10.1051/0004-6361/201322711

    2014 doi

  32. [40]

    H., Baas , F., Allamandola , L

    Lacy , J. H., Baas , F., Allamandola , L. J., et al. 1984, , 276, 533, 10.1086/161642

    1984 doi

  33. [41]

    1979, , 79, 256

    Leger , A., Klein , J., de Cheveigne , S., et al. 1979, , 79, 256

    1979

  34. [42]

    2025, , 986, 156, 10.3847/1538-4357/add538

    Lyu , J., Yang , X., Li , A., et al. 2025, , 986, 156, 10.3847/1538-4357/add538

    2025 doi

  35. [43]

    R., & Bonnamy , A

    Marciniak , A., Joblin , C., Mulas , G., Mundlapati , V. R., & Bonnamy , A. 2021, , 652, A42, 10.1051/0004-6361/202140737

    2021 doi

  36. [44]

    Martini , P., Sellgren , K., & Hora , J. L. 1997, , 484, 296, 10.1086/304322

    1997 doi

  37. [45]

    Millar , T. J. 2005, Astronomy and Geophysics, 46, 2.29, 10.1111/j.1468-4004.2005.46229.x

    2005

  38. [46]

    2013, , 552, A15, 10.1051/0004-6361/201220757

    Montillaud , J., Joblin , C., & Toublanc , D. 2013, , 552, A15, 10.1051/0004-6361/201220757

    2013 doi

  39. [47]

    A., Godard , B., Bryan Changala , P., et al

    Neufeld , D. A., Godard , B., Bryan Changala , P., et al. 2021, , 917, 15, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac05c9

    2021 doi

  40. [48]

    I., Sakon , I., et al

    Onaka , T., Mori , T. I., Sakon , I., et al. 2014, , 780, 114, 10.1088/0004-637X/780/2/114

    2014 doi

  41. [49]

    2024, , 685, A74, 10.1051/0004-6361/202348244

    Peeters , E., Habart , E., Bern \'e , O., et al. 2024, , 685, A74, 10.1051/0004-6361/202348244

    2024 doi

  42. [50]

    R., Hily-Blant , P., Gerin , M., & Teyssier , D

    Pety , J., Goicoechea , J. R., Hily-Blant , P., Gerin , M., & Teyssier , D. 2007, , 464, L41, 10.1051/0004-6361:20067009

    2007 doi

  43. [51]

    2015, , 577, A16, 10.1051/0004-6361/201425590

    Pilleri , P., Joblin , C., Boulanger , F., & Onaka , T. 2015, , 577, A16, 10.1051/0004-6361/201425590

    2015 doi

  44. [52]

    M., Fraser , H

    Pontoppidan , K. M., Fraser , H. J., Dartois , E., et al. 2003, , 408, 981, 10.1051/0004-6361:20031030

    2003 doi

  45. [53]

    M., Sip o cz , B

    Price-Whelan , A. M., Sip o cz , B. M., G \"u nther , H. M., et al. 2018, , 156, 123, 10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f

    2018 doi

  46. [54]

    Prozesky , A., & Smits , D. P. 2018, , 478, 2766, 10.1093/mnras/sty1189

    2018 doi

  47. [55]

    Rauscher , B. J. 2024, , 136, 015001, 10.1088/1538-3873/ad1b36

    2024 doi

  48. [56]

    A., Allamandola , L

    Sandford , S. A., Allamandola , L. J., Tielens , A. G. G. M., & Valero , G. J. 1988, , 329, 498, 10.1086/166395

    1988 doi

  49. [57]

    A., Bernstein , M

    Sandford , S. A., Bernstein , M. P., & Materese , C. K. 2013, , 205, 8, 10.1088/0067-0049/205/1/8

    2013 doi

  50. [58]

    2020, , 639, A144, 10.1051/0004-6361/202037937

    Schirmer , T., Abergel , A., Verstraete , L., et al. 2020, , 639, A144, 10.1051/0004-6361/202037937

    2020 doi

  51. [59]

    G., Sellgren , K., & Tokunaga , A

    Smith , R. G., Sellgren , K., & Tokunaga , A. T. 1989, , 344, 413, 10.1086/167809

    1989 doi

  52. [60]

    Tielens , A. G. G. M. 2008, , 46, 289, 10.1146/annurev.astro.46.060407.145211

    2008

  53. [61]

    Tielens , A. G. G. M. 2023, in European Conference on Laboratory Astrophysics ECLA2020. The Interplay of Dust, 129--150, 10.1007/978-3-031-29003-9_15

    2023 doi

  54. [62]

    Tielens , A. G. G. M., & Hollenbach , D. 1985, , 291, 722, 10.1086/163111

    1985 doi

  55. [63]

    2017, Molecular Astrophysics, 9, 1, 10.1016/j.molap.2017.11.001

    Wakelam , V., Bron , E., Cazaux , S., et al. 2017, Molecular Astrophysics, 9, 1, 10.1016/j.molap.2017.11.001

    2017 doi

  56. [64]

    W., Glasse , A., et al

    Wells , M., Pel , J. W., Glasse , A., et al. 2015, , 127, 646, 10.1086/682281

    2015 doi

  57. [65]

    W., Uchida , K

    Werner , M. W., Uchida , K. I., Sellgren , K., et al. 2004, , 154, 309, 10.1086/422413

    2004 doi

  58. [66]

    N., Gordon , K

    Witt , A. N., Gordon , K. D., Vijh , U. P., et al. 2006, , 636, 303, 10.1086/498052

    2006 doi

  59. [67]

    G., Vallini , L., & Chevance , M

    Wolfire , M. G., Vallini , L., & Chevance , M. 2022, , 60, 247, 10.1146/annurev-astro-052920-010254

    2022 doi

  60. [68]

    J., & Li , A

    Yang , X. J., & Li , A. 2023 a , , 268, 50, 10.3847/1538-4365/acebe6

    2023 doi

  61. [69]

    2023 b , , 268, 12, 10.3847/1538-4365/ace4c6

    ---. 2023 b , , 268, 12, 10.3847/1538-4365/ace4c6

    2023 doi

  62. [70]

    2025, , 983, 136, 10.3847/1538-4357/adbd11

    ---. 2025, , 983, 136, 10.3847/1538-4357/adbd11

    2025 doi

  63. [71]

    J., Li , A., & Glaser , R

    Yang , X. J., Li , A., & Glaser , R. 2020, , 251, 12, 10.3847/1538-4365/abba28

    2020 doi

  64. [72]

    P., Guillet , V., et al

    Ysard , N., Jones , A. P., Guillet , V., et al. 2024, , 684, A34, 10.1051/0004-6361/202348391

    2024 doi

  65. [73]

    2025, , 696, A99, 10.1051/0004-6361/202453441

    Zannese , M., Tabone , B., Habart , E., et al. 2025, , 696, A99, 10.1051/0004-6361/202453441

    2025 doi

  66. [74]

    Zubko , V., Dwek , E., & Arendt , R. G. 2004, , 152, 211, 10.1086/382351

    2004 doi

  67. [75]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archiveprefix author booktitle chapter edition editor howpublished institution eprint journal key month note number organization pages publisher school series title type volume year label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sent...

  68. [76]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 gl...

  69. [77]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archivePrefix author booktitle chapter doi edition editor eprint howpublished institution journal key month number organization pages publisher school series title misctitle type volume year version url label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.stat...

  70. [78]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION format.url url empty "" new.block "" url * "" * if FUNCTION format.eprint eprint empty "" archivePrefix empty "" archivePrefix "arXiv" = new.block " " eprint * " " * new.block " " eprint * " " * if if if FUNCTION format.d...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.