Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 29 references

Laser self-injection locking to fiber Fabry-Perot resonator for frequency comb generation

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A 100 mW distributed-feedback laser, self-injection locked to a high-finesse fiber Fabry-Perot resonator, reaches the cavity-soliton regime and generates optical frequency combs.

desk verdict A plausible first demonstration of 100 mW-level cavity soliton combs in a fiber Fabry-Pérot resonator, but the single-soliton identification rests on one sech² spectrum and would tighten with an RF beatnote or autocorrelation for that exact state. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.21081 v1 pith:YI4TSZXU submitted 2025-06-26 physics.optics

Germain Bourcier (LAAS-MOST) , Stephane Balac (IRMAR) , Julien Lumeau (RCMO , FRESNEL) , Antonin Moreau (FRESNEL) , Thomas Bunel (PhLAM) , Arnaud Mussot (PhLAM) , Matteo Conforti (Photonique
show 5 more authors
IRCICA PhLAM) Vincent Crozatier Olivier Llopis (LAAS-MOST) Arnaud Fernandez (LAAS-MOST)
This is my paper
classification physics.optics
keywords self-injectionlockingfiberFabry-PerotresonatorcavitysolitonKerrfrequencycombdistributedfeedbacklaserself-phasemodulationinstabilitytuningcurve
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper aims to show that a low-cost distributed-feedback diode laser can be stabilized by self-injection locking to a high-finesse fiber Fabry-Perot resonator and, at pump powers as low as 100 mW, generate optical frequency combs including cavity solitons. The authors argue that the key to this low-power route is the initial phase of the optical feedback loop: only a narrow window, between $-\pi/3$ and 0, lets the locked laser reach the soliton existence range. They support the claim with a Lang-Kobayashi-type model of the laser coupled to the resonator's exact transmission transfer function, extended to include self-phase modulation, and they compare simulated tuning curves with measured transmission scans. If correct, the result replaces watt-level pump lasers and Pound-Drever-Hall stabilization with a compact, low-cost comb source.

What carries the argument

The central object is the nonlinear tuning curve of the self-injection-locked laser, $\bar{\xi} = \bar{\zeta} + (\alpha K/\tau_{\mathrm{LC}}) |T(\bar{\zeta})| \sin \psi(\bar{\zeta})$, with detunings shifted by Kerr self-phase modulation through $\bar{\xi} = \xi - 6L\gamma P_{\mathrm{IC}}/(2\pi\tau)$ and $\bar{\zeta} = \zeta - 6L\gamma P_{\mathrm{IC}}/(2\pi\tau)$. It combines the Lang-Kobayashi rate equations for the laser diode with the exact transmission transfer function $T(\zeta)$ of the fiber Fabry-Perot cavity rather than a Lorentzian approximation. The initial feedback phase $\psi_0$ controls where the locked inner branch sits relative to the tilted resonance; the paper shows that only $\psi_0$ between $-\pi/3$ and 0 places the locked-state region inside the soliton existence range. The experimental companion is a forward current ramp that walks the effective laser frequency from blue-detuned (modulation instability, chaos) to red-detuned (solitons).

What would settle it

Set the phase shifter to an initial phase outside the $[-\pi/3, 0]$ window, for example $5\pi/8$, ramp the laser current from blue to red detuning at 100 mW, and look for the soliton step in the transmitted power and spectrum: the paper's model predicts no inner locked branch and no soliton, so a clean soliton step would falsify the phase-window claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper claims that self-injection locking of a distributed-feedback laser to a high-Q fiber Fabry-Perot resonator made of highly nonlinear fiber produces Kerr frequency combs at 100 mW input power, and that the cavity-soliton regime is reached during a forward detuning scan from blue to red detuning. The transmitted spectra show primary combs, modulation-instability and chaotic combs, soliton crystals, multiple solitons, and a single soliton; the soliton spectra fit a $\mathrm{sech}^2$ envelope and a multi-soliton repetition-rate beatnote has phase noise below $-80$ dBc/Hz above 10 Hz. According to the authors, this is the first demonstration of cavity solitons in a centimeter-scale fiber Fabry-Perot resonator at such low power, using a DFB laser without an erbium-doped fiber amplifier. The accompanying model, which adds self-phase modulation to the self-injection-locking equations, predicts that the locked-state region can intersect the soliton existence range only for certain initial feedback phases.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the initial optical phase of the feedback loop can be set and held inside a narrow window (between $-\pi/3$ and 0) throughout the detuning scan; the paper itself reports that soliton lifetime depends strongly on phase and temperature fluctuations.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Cavity-soliton combs in fiber Fabry-Perot resonators no longer require watt-level pump power or an erbium-doped fiber amplifier; a 100 mW DFB laser suffices.
  • The forward detuning scan can be reversed by reducing the laser current, retracing the comb states so a user can return from soliton to primary comb by hand.
  • Self-injection locking provides a broader noise-reduction bandwidth than Pound-Drever-Hall stabilization, with the locking range set by the initial phase rather than by an electronic servo bandwidth.
  • The initial-phase window $[-\pi/3, 0]$ becomes a design rule for future low-power fiber Fabry-Perot comb sources.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the initial phase window can be actively servo-controlled rather than passively stabilized by thermal isolation, the same resonator could become a turnkey soliton comb source; the paper demonstrates passive stability but does not implement active phase locking.
  • The model's statement that a backward scan also reaches the soliton existence range suggests a hysteresis-based re-locking procedure could make soliton access repeatable despite thermal drift; this is not exploited in the experiments.
  • Because the mechanism depends mainly on the transmission transfer function and Kerr nonlinearity, the same self-injection-locking design should transfer to other wavelengths or to integrated Fabry-Perot cavities with comparable finesse, which would be a direct test of the model's generality.
  • The unidentified low-frequency bump in the soliton phase noise could be probed by controlled changes of fiber length or temperature; identifying its origin would test whether the thermo-optical drift model is complete.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports the use of self-injection locking (SIL) of a distributed-feedback (DFB) laser to a high-Q fiber Fabry-Pérot (FFP) resonator made of highly nonlinear fiber, with the goal of generating optical frequency combs at low pump powers. The authors derive a Lang-Kobayashi-type tuning-curve model for SIL with transmission feedback, extend it by including self-phase modulation, and validate the linear (low-power) model against experimental transmission scans for different initial feedback phases. At pump powers between 80 and 120 mW they observe a sequence of comb states during a forward current scan, and claim the first demonstration of cavity solitons in an FFP resonator at 100 mW without an erbium-doped fiber amplifier, based on an optical spectrum with a sech^2 fit and on RF beatnotes and phase-noise measurements for multiple-soliton and soliton-crystal states.

Significance. If fully substantiated, the result would be a notable advance: it would extend the SIL technique, previously demonstrated for microresonators, to fiber Fabry-Pérot resonators and lower the pump power for soliton generation in such cavities by roughly an order of magnitude compared with prior CW-pumped FFP work. The paper has genuine strengths: the low-power tuning-curve model is validated against experiment (Fig. 3), the model parameters are not fitted to the soliton observations, and the frequency-noise and phase-noise characterizations (Figs. 2 and 6h) are useful. However, the central claim of single-soliton generation at 100 mW is supported by limited direct evidence, and the practical robustness of the method is not established. Those issues are load-bearing and require attention before the claim can be accepted at the level presented.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section III, Fig. 6(f)] The identification of the state labelled 'single soliton' rests on a single optical spectrum with a sech^2 envelope fit. The RF beatnote in Fig. 6(g) and the phase-noise curves in Fig. 6(h) are explicitly attributed to multiple-soliton and soliton-crystal states, and the text states that phase noise for a single soliton could not be measured. Because multi-soliton and chaotic states can also produce spectra that resemble sech^2 over limited spans, the claim that a single cavity soliton was generated at 100 mW is not established at the level needed for a 'first demonstration'. I recommend providing a direct repetition-rate or autocorrelation measurement for the exact state shown in Fig. 6(f), or alternatively softening the headline claim to state that solitonic states (multiple solitons and soliton crystals) were observed and that one spectrum is consistent with a single soliton but could not be fully verified.
  2. [Section III, Fig. 5 and phase-stability discussion] The paper asserts that only an initial phase between -π/3 and 0 allows access to the soliton existence range, and argues that stable phase control is essential. However, no experimental variation of the initial phase in the nonlinear regime is reported to confirm this prediction; the nonlinear experiments appear to be carried out at a single phase setting. Furthermore, the text notes that the soliton lifetime is highly dependent on phase and temperature fluctuations, making it unstable over time. This leaves the repeatability and practical robustness of the method unquantified. At minimum, a statement of the measured phase drift over the observation time and its effect on the comb state should be added.
  3. [Section III, Eqs. (5)-(7) and Fig. 6(a,b)] The nonlinear model comparison is only qualitative. The simulated tuning curve in Fig. 6(a) is said to 'match' the experimental transmission in Fig. 6(b), but no quantitative metric (e.g., detuning ranges, locking widths, or thresholds) is provided, and the soliton existence range is imported from prior Lugiato-Lefever theory rather than independently computed or measured for this resonator. The model also neglects effects that are known to be relevant in FFP combs, such as stimulated Brillouin scattering and thermal effects. I therefore view the predicted 'accessibility of the narrow soliton existence range' as a plausible scenario rather than a validated quantitative prediction; the paper should either supply quantitative comparison or explicitly label this part as a plausibility argument.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Throughout] The spelling of 'Fabry-Perot' is inconsistent: the title uses a hyphen but the abstract and body often use 'Fabry Perot'. Please standardize.
  2. [Section II, Eq. (3)] In Eq. (3), the product 'αΚ' should be written with a space or multiplication dot to avoid confusion between the attenuation factor α and the coupling coefficient K, which are both defined with similar notation.
  3. [Section III, Fig. 6(h) paragraph] The sentence describing the phase-noise bumps contains garbled characters where offset frequencies should be specified ('between ³ and ⁴'). Please provide the numerical values in hertz.
  4. [Section III] The phrase 'This not clearly understood process' should be reworded, for example to 'This still-not-fully-understood process'.
  5. [Section II] The sentence 'L-K equations describe light injection semiconductor laser in a single-mode model' is ungrammatical; consider 'The L-K equations describe a single-mode semiconductor laser under optical injection'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the model parameters are independently measured and the soliton observation is not used to fit any model constant.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. The linear SIL tuning-curve model is adapted from Kondratiev et al. [18] via Lang-Kobayashi rate equations, and the resonator parameters (rho, kappa, a, gamma, beta2, finesse) are extracted from transmission measurements or component data, not fitted to the comb observations. The model is validated at low power against experimental transmitted-power scans for three initial phases (Fig. 3), which is a genuine out-of-sample comparison. The nonlinear extension (Eqs. 5-7) is a standard SPM detuning shift proportional to intracavity power and is used only to locate the locking curves relative to the independently defined soliton existence range (Figs. 4-5), yielding the phase-range prediction (-pi/3, 0) that the experiment then confirms. The 100 mW soliton claim rests on direct measurements (optical spectrum with sech2 envelope, RF beatnote, phase noise), not on the model. Self-citations [13] and [27] provide background and components (low phase noise SIL, MI threshold, stationary LLE) and involve overlapping authors, but none is used to define or force the central result; the central claim would stand even if those citations were replaced by independent references. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no known result is repackaged. Whether the single-soliton identification is fully evidenced by the sech2 spectrum is a correctness/evidence question, not a circularity one. Therefore no circular step can be exhibited.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The model relies on standard laser rate equations and the Lugiato-Lefever framework. The FFP parameters (ρ, κ, a) are fitted to the measured transmission function; no new physical entities are introduced. The nonlinear model incorporates SPM via a standard detuning shift, and no postulation of new particles, forces, or dimensions appears.

free parameters (3)
  • FFP mirror reflectivity ρ = 0.9993
    Extracted from transmission measurement (Fig. 1 inset), used in transfer function Eq. (4).
  • FFP mirror transmissivity κ = 0.0374
    Extracted from transmission measurement, used in Eq. (4).
  • FFP round-trip losses a = 0.995
    Extracted from transmission measurement, used in Eq. (4).
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Lang-Kobayashi rate equations describe the DFB laser under optical feedback.
    Equations (1)-(2) are adopted as the dynamical model for the laser field; standard in laser physics.
  • domain assumption Single-frequency oscillation of the laser field is assumed.
    Section II states 'we consider a single-frequency oscillation ω_eff'; neglects multimode effects.
  • standard math The fiber Fabry-Perot resonator response is given by the Airy transmission function Eq. (4).
    Used exact transfer function rather than Lorentzian approximation, justified for FFP without Rayleigh backscattering.
  • domain assumption Self-phase modulation shifts the detuning according to Eqs. (5)-(6).
    Adopted from prior work on SIL with SPM; the shift is proportional to intracavity power and used to derive nonlinear tuning curves.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Laser self-injection locking to fiber Fabry-Perot resonator for frequency comb generation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YI4TSZXU

@misc{pith2026250621081,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Laser self-injection locking to fiber Fabry-Perot resonator for frequency comb generation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/YI4TSZXU}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.21081}
}
read the original abstract

This study demonstrates that self-injection locking (SIL) of a distributed feedback (DFB) laser to a high-Q fiber Fabry Perot (FFP) resonator, fabricated with highly nonlinear fiber, allows optical frequency combs (OFC) generation with a laser power as low as 100 mW. More precisely, cavity soliton (CS) regime has been observed in this configuration, along with other types of combs. The laser stabilization using SIL is described. Then the system's behavior is analyzed through modeling the laser's dynamics and comparing the model results to experimental tuning curve measurements. Our findings highlight the critical role of the initial phase of the fiber link between laser and FFP in determining the stability and effectiveness of the locking process. We explore the dynamics of the nonlinear SIL process while varying the laser current, revealing the transition from modulation instability to chaotic comb states, and eventually to soliton formation as the system moves from an effective blue-detuned to an effective red-detuned regime. Notably, the inclusion of self-phase modulation (SPM) in the SIL model predicts accessibility of the narrow soliton existence range. These results highlight the potential of SIL in FFP resonators for low-power, stable OFC generation, offering a promising path forward for practical applications.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.21081 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the SIL setup with a laser diode, a circulator (CIRC), a variable optical attenuator (VOA) and a phase shifter. Oscilloscope and optical spectrum analyzer (OSA) are used for measurements. The inset show a picture of the FFP resonator used in this experiment and its measured transmission function in amplitude and phase. II. SELF-INJECTION LOCKING Optical feedback is an interesting approach… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Frequency noise of the free running laser (above, green) and the locked laser (blue). Red dots correspond to the measurement system noise floor [17]. We also carried out a laser current modulation experiment. By varying the laser current using a linear modulation ramp, we achieve a linear variation of the laser frequency from high to low frequencies. We define the Laser-FFP detuning parameter 𝜉 by the difference bet… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. (a, b, c) Simulated tuning curves (orange lines) and forward detuning path (green dashed lines) for different initial phase 𝜓0 . (a, d) 𝜓0 = −𝜋/8, (b, e) 𝜓0 = 𝜋/8 and (c, f) 𝜓0 = 5𝜋/8. The dashed orange lines correspond to the unstable regions. (d, e, f) Simulated transmission of the FFP corresponding to the forward detuning path (green dashed lines) and experimental results for the corresponding initial phase (red … view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Simulated tuning curves including self-phase modulation with an input power of 1 W (orange lines) and forward detuning path (green dashed lines) for initial phase 𝜓0 = 0. The grey line represents the simulated tuning curves without self-phase modulation. The correspond…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

29 extracted references · 15 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    D. T. Spencer et al., « An optical-frequency synthesizer using integrated photonics », Nature, vol. 557, n o 7703, p. 81 -85, May 2018, doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0065-7

    doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0065-7 2018

  2. [2]

    Liu et al., « Photonic microwave generation in the X- and K-band using integrated soliton microcombs », Nat

    J. Liu et al., « Photonic microwave generation in the X- and K-band using integrated soliton microcombs », Nat. Photonics, vol. 14, no 8, p. 486-491, Aug. 2020, doi: 10.1038/s41566-020-0617-x

    work page doi:10.1038/s41566-020-0617-x 2020

  3. [3]

    Marin -Palomo et al

    P. Marin -Palomo et al. , « Microresonator-based solitons for massively parallel coherent optical communications », Nature, vol. 546, n o 7657, p. 274-279, June 2017, doi: 10.1038/nature22387

    work page doi:10.1038/nature22387 2017

  4. [4]

    Corcoran et al., « Ultra-dense optical data transmission over standard fibre with a single chip source », Nat Commun, vol

    B. Corcoran et al., « Ultra-dense optical data transmission over standard fibre with a single chip source », Nat Commun, vol. 11, no 1, p. 2568, May 2020, doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-16265-x

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16265-x 2020

  5. [5]

    Riemensberger et al., « Massively parallel coherent laser ranging using a soliton microcomb », Nature, vol

    J. Riemensberger et al., « Massively parallel coherent laser ranging using a soliton microcomb », Nature, vol. 581, n o 7807, p. 164-170, May 2020, doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2239-3

    doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2239-3 2020

  6. [6]

    Suh et K

    M.-G. Suh et K. Vahala, « Soliton Microcomb Range Measurement », Science, vol. 359, n o 6378, p. 884 -887, Feb. 2018, doi: 10.1126/science.aao1968

    doi:10.1126/science.aao1968 2018

  7. [7]

    M.-G. Suh, Q. -F. Yang, K. Y. Yang, X. Yi, et K. Vahala, « Microresonator Soliton Dual -Comb Spectroscopy », Science, vol. 354, no 6312, p. 600-603, Nov. 2016, doi: 10.1126/science.aah6516

    doi:10.1126/science.aah6516 2016

  8. [8]

    M. Nie, K. Jia, Y. Xie, S. Zhu, Z. Xie, et S. -W. Huang, « Synthesized spatiotemporal mode -locking and photonic flywheel in multimode mesoresonators », Nat Commun , vol. 13, n o 1, p. 6395, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-34103-0

    doi:10.1038/s41467-022-34103-0 2022

Show all 29 references
  1. [9]

    Bunel et al., « 28 THz soliton frequency comb in a continuous -wave pumped fiber Fabry –Pérot resonator », APL Photonics , vol

    T. Bunel et al., « 28 THz soliton frequency comb in a continuous -wave pumped fiber Fabry –Pérot resonator », APL Photonics , vol. 9, n o 1, p. 010804, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.1063/5.0176533

    2024 doi

  2. [10]

    Jia et al

    K. Jia et al. , « Photonic Flywheel in a Monolithic Fiber Resonator », Phys. Rev. Lett. , vol. 125, n o 14, p. 143902, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.143902

    2020 doi

  3. [11]

    R. W. P. Drever et al., « Laser phase and frequency stabilization using an optical resonator », Appl. Phys. B, vol. 31, no 2, p. 97-105, June 1983, doi: 10.1007/BF00702605

    1983 doi

  4. [12]

    Bunel et al., « Impact of pump pulse duration on modulation instability Kerr frequency combs in fiber Fabry –Pérot resonators », Opt

    T. Bunel et al., « Impact of pump pulse duration on modulation instability Kerr frequency combs in fiber Fabry –Pérot resonators », Opt. Lett., vol. 48, no 22, p. 5955, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.1364/OL.506100

    2023 doi

  5. [13]

    S. M. Ousaid et al., « Low phase noise self -injection-locked diode laser with a high-Q fiber resonator: model and experiment », Opt. Lett., vol. 49, no 8, p. 1933, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.1364/OL.514778

    1933 doi

  6. [14]

    Shen et al

    B. Shen et al. , « Integrated turnkey soliton microcombs operated at CMOS frequencies », Nature, vol. 582, n o 7812, p. 365 -369, June 2020, doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2358-x

    2020 doi

  7. [15]

    Abdallah, Y

    Z. Abdallah, Y. G. Boucher, A. Fernandez, S. Balac, et O. Llopis, « Radio frequency spectral characterization and model parameters extraction of high Q optical resonators », Sci Rep , vol. 6, n o 1, p. 27208, June 2016, doi: 10.1038/srep27208

    2016 doi

  8. [16]

    J. Geng, L. Yang, J. Liang, S. Liu, et Y. Zhang, « Stability in self - injection locking of the DFB laser through a fiber optic resonator », Optics Communications , vol. 505, p. 127531, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.optcom.2021.127531

    2022

  9. [17]

    Llopis, Z

    O. Llopis, Z. Abdallah, V. Auroux, et A. Fernandez, « High spectral purity laser characterization with a self -heterodyne frequency discriminator », in 2015 Joint Conference of the IEEE International Frequency Control Symposium & the Europea n Frequency and Time Forum, Denver,...

    2015

  10. [18]

    N. M. Kondratiev et al., « Self-injection locking of a laser diode to a high- Q WGM microresona tor », Opt. Express, vol. 25, n o 23, p. 28167, Nov. 2017, doi: 10.1364/OE.25.028167

    2017 doi

  11. [19]

    A. S. Voloshin et al. , « Dynamics of soliton self -injection locking in optical microresonators », Nat Commun, vol. 12, n o 1, p. 235, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-20196-y

    2021 doi

  12. [20]

    Sinquin et M

    B. Sinquin et M. Romanelli, « Determination of the linewidth enhancement factor of semiconductor lasers by complete optical field reconstruction », Opt. Lett. , vol. 48, n o 4, p. 863, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.1364/OL.483776

    2023 doi

  13. [21]

    Lang et K

    R. Lang et K. Kobayashi, « External optical feedback effects on semiconductor injection laser properties », IEEE J. Quantum Electron. , vol. 16, no 3, p. 347-355, Mar 1980, doi: 10.1109/JQE.1980.1070479

    1980

  14. [22]

    N. M. Kondratiev et al. , « Recent Advances in Laser Self -Injection Locking to High -Q Microresonators », Front. Phys. , vol. 18, n o 2, p. 21305, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s11467-022-1245-3

    2023 doi

  15. [23]

    Guo et al ., « Universal dynamics and deterministic switching of dissipative Kerr solitons in optical microresonators », Nature Phys, vol

    H. Guo et al ., « Universal dynamics and deterministic switching of dissipative Kerr solitons in optical microresonators », Nature Phys, vol. 13, no 1, p. 94-102, Jan. 2017, doi: 10.1038/nphys3893

    2017 doi

  16. [24]

    Kondratiev, A

    N. Kondratiev, A. Gor odnitskiy, et V. Lobanov, « Influence of the microresonator nonlinearity on the self -injection locking effect », EPJ Web Conf. , vol. 220, p. 02006, 2019, doi: 10.1051/epjconf/201922002006

    2019

  17. [25]

    Godey, I

    C. Godey, I. Balakireva, A. Coillet, et Y. K. Chembo, « Stability Analysis of the Lugiato-Lefever Model for Kerr Optical Frequency Combs. Part I: Case of Normal Dispersion », Phys. Rev. A, vol. 89, n o 6, p. 063814, June 2014, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.89.063814

    2014 doi

  18. [26]

    Musgrave, S.-W

    J. Musgrave, S.-W. Huang, et M. Nie, « Microcombs in fiber Fabry–Pérot cavities », APL Photonics , vol. 8, n o 12, p. 121101, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.1063/5.0177134

    2023 doi

  19. [27]

    Bourcier et al

    G. Bourcier et al. , « Optimization of a fiber Fabry –Perot resonator for low-threshold modulation instability Kerr frequency combs », Opt. Lett., vol. 49, no 11, p. 3214, June 2024, doi: 10.1364/OL.523291

    2024 doi

  20. [28]

    Liao et al., « Dependence of a microresonator Kerr frequency comb on the pump linewidth », Opt

    P. Liao et al., « Dependence of a microresonator Kerr frequency comb on the pump linewidth », Opt. Lett. , vol. 42, n o 4, p. 779, Feb. 2017, doi: 10.1364/OL.42.000779

    2017 doi

  21. [29]

    Lucas, P

    E. Lucas, P. Brochard, R. Bouchand, S. Schilt, T. Südmeyer, et T. J. Kippenberg, « Ultralow-noise photonic microwave synthesis using a soliton microcomb-based transfer oscillator », Nat Commun, vol. 11, no 1, p. 374, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-14059-4

    2020 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.