pith. sign in

arxiv: 2506.21709 · v3 · submitted 2025-06-26 · ❄️ cond-mat.quant-gas

A canonical approach to quantum fluctuations

Joanna Ruhl , Vanja Dunjko , Maxim Olshanii This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 07:17 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.quant-gas
keywords quantum fluctuationssoliton breathersnonlinear Schrödinger equationcanonical formalismintegrable systemscoupling quenchBose-Einstein condensatesBogoliubov modes
0
0 comments X

The pith

A canonical formalism yields analytic expressions for quantum fluctuations in soliton positions, velocities, norms, and phases for NLS breathers after a coupling quench.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces a canonical formalism to compute quantum fluctuations of discrete degrees of freedom such as soliton parameters in integrable partial differential equations that serve as classical approximations to underlying many-body quantum systems. It applies this approach specifically to the 2-soliton and 3-soliton breather solutions of the nonlinear Schrödinger equation, where the breathers form from an initial elementary soliton via a sudden quench of the coupling constant. The method calculates the immediate post-quench fluctuations under both white-noise and correlated-noise models for the vacuum state, and it incorporates particle-number-conserving Bogoliubov modes in the correlated case. Unlike earlier treatments, the formalism produces closed analytic solutions for the fluctuations in each scenario.

Core claim

The central claim is that a canonical formalism exists for computing quantum fluctuations of certain discrete degrees of freedom in systems governed by integrable partial differential equations with known Hamiltonian structure, when these equations arise as classical-field approximations to many-body quantum systems; applying the formalism to 2- and 3-soliton breathers of the nonlinear Schrödinger equation after a coupling quench gives analytic expressions for the post-quench fluctuations in the positions, velocities, norms, and phases of the constituent solitons, with the result that U(1)-symmetry-conserving corrections to the Bogoliubov modes leave the final values unchanged in most cases.

What carries the argument

The canonical formalism that maps the Hamiltonian structure of the integrable PDE to quantum fluctuations in the discrete soliton parameters (positions, velocities, norms, phases).

If this is right

  • Fluctuations in soliton positions and velocities for the 2-soliton breather can be obtained in closed form for both noise models.
  • The same analytic treatment extends to the three-soliton breather case, again for white-noise and correlated-noise vacua.
  • Inclusion of particle-number conservation via adjusted Bogoliubov modes leaves the computed fluctuation values unchanged in most examined cases.
  • The formalism applies to any integrable PDE with a known Hamiltonian structure that approximates a quantum many-body system.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The method could be tested by comparing predicted phase fluctuations against interference measurements in quenched Bose gases.
  • Similar canonical reductions might apply to other integrable models such as the Korteweg-de Vries equation when treated as classical approximations.
  • The analytic access to post-quench fluctuations offers a route to estimating soliton lifetimes or coherence times in finite-temperature quantum gases without full many-body numerics.

Load-bearing premise

The breathers arise from quenching the coupling constant starting from a single soliton, and the initial fluctuation vacuum is well captured by either white-noise or correlated-noise assumptions that may include U(1)-symmetry-conserving Bogoliubov modes.

What would settle it

Direct measurement of the variance in soliton position or phase immediately after a coupling quench in a one-dimensional Bose gas that either matches or deviates from the analytic expressions derived for the 2-soliton breather under the white-noise vacuum model.

read the original abstract

We present a canonical formalism for computing quantum fluctuations of certain discrete degrees of freedom in systems governed by integrable partial differential equations with known Hamiltonian structure, provided these models are classical-field approximations of underlying many-body quantum systems. We then apply the formalism to both the 2-soliton and 3-soliton breather solutions of the nonlinear Schr\"odinger equation, assuming the breathers are created from an initial elementary soliton by quenching the coupling constant. In particular, we compute the immediate post-quench quantum fluctuations in the positions, velocities, norms, and phases of the constituent solitons. For each case, we consider both the white-noise and correlated-noise models for the fluctuation vacuum state. Unlike previous treatments of the problem, our method allows for analytic solutions. Additionally, in the correlated-noise case, we consider the particle-number-conserving (also called $U(1)$-symmetry-conserving) Bogoliubov modes, i.e., modes with the proper correction to preserve the total particle number. We find that in most (but not all) cases, these corrections do not change the final result.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a canonical formalism for computing quantum fluctuations of discrete degrees of freedom (positions, velocities, norms, phases) in integrable PDEs with known Hamiltonian structure, when these are classical-field approximations to many-body quantum systems. It applies the formalism to 2-soliton and 3-soliton breather solutions of the nonlinear Schrödinger equation obtained by quenching the coupling constant from an initial elementary soliton, deriving analytic expressions for immediate post-quench fluctuations under both white-noise and correlated-noise vacuum models, including U(1)-symmetry-conserving Bogoliubov modes. The authors find that the U(1) corrections leave most results unchanged.

Significance. If the vacuum modeling assumptions hold, the work supplies analytic expressions for quantum fluctuations in soliton parameters within integrable classical-field models, offering a concrete advance over prior numerical approaches and enabling falsifiable predictions for quantum many-body systems approximated by NLS-type equations. The emphasis on canonical structure and analytic solvability strengthens the contribution for the quantum-gas community.

major comments (1)
  1. [Application to 2-soliton and 3-soliton cases] Application to 2-soliton and 3-soliton cases (abstract and §4–5): the central claim that the formalism yields analytic post-quench variances for soliton parameters rests on the input assumption that the fluctuation vacuum is adequately represented by white-noise or U(1)-corrected correlated-noise models. No explicit mapping from the pre-quench many-body Hilbert space to these noise ansatzes is provided; if the actual quench-generated correlations differ, the reported analytic expressions do not correspond to the underlying quantum system. This is load-bearing for the application results.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Formalism] Notation for the canonical variables and Poisson brackets in the formalism section could be clarified with an explicit table comparing them to standard Bogoliubov-de Gennes modes.
  2. [Results] The statement that U(1) corrections 'do not change the final result' in most cases would benefit from a quantitative table listing the relative difference for each observable in the 2- and 3-soliton cases.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading, positive evaluation of the work's significance, and constructive major comment. We address the point below and propose targeted revisions to improve clarity on the scope of our assumptions.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Application to 2-soliton and 3-soliton cases] Application to 2-soliton and 3-soliton cases (abstract and §4–5): the central claim that the formalism yields analytic post-quench variances for soliton parameters rests on the input assumption that the fluctuation vacuum is adequately represented by white-noise or U(1)-corrected correlated-noise models. No explicit mapping from the pre-quench many-body Hilbert space to these noise ansatzes is provided; if the actual quench-generated correlations differ, the reported analytic expressions do not correspond to the underlying quantum system. This is load-bearing for the application results.

    Authors: We thank the referee for highlighting this important point regarding the assumptions underlying our applications. The canonical formalism we develop computes fluctuations for a given choice of initial vacuum model; the white-noise and U(1)-corrected correlated-noise models are standard ansatzes in the classical-field literature for representing leading-order quantum vacuum fluctuations in NLS systems. The quench is modeled as an instantaneous parameter change, with post-quench fluctuations derived from the pre-quench vacuum. While the manuscript does not derive an explicit mapping from the full many-body Hilbert space (as the focus is on the analytic canonical method once the vacuum is specified), these models are motivated by the Bogoliubov approximation in the classical-field limit and have been used successfully in related quench studies. We agree that this assumption is load-bearing for interpreting the results as direct predictions for the quantum system. In revision we will add a dedicated paragraph in the introduction and expand the discussion in §§4–5 to explicitly state the assumptions, justify the models via references to prior literature on classical-field approximations, outline their expected regime of validity, and note the conditional nature of the analytic expressions. This will clarify the scope without altering the derivations or results. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation applies formalism to explicit input assumptions

full rationale

The paper introduces a canonical formalism for quantum fluctuations in integrable PDEs treated as classical-field approximations of many-body systems, then applies it to 2- and 3-soliton breathers of the NLS equation under the stated modeling premises. The white-noise and correlated-noise vacuum states (including U(1)-symmetry-conserving Bogoliubov modes) are introduced as assumptions for the post-quench fluctuation state rather than outputs derived from the formalism itself. The analytic expressions for variances in soliton parameters follow directly from applying the Hamiltonian-based canonical procedure to these inputs, without any reduction of the central results to self-definition, parameter fitting renamed as prediction, or load-bearing self-citation chains. The derivation remains self-contained against the external benchmark of the known integrable structure and standard Bogoliubov treatment.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Review based on abstract only; full text may reveal additional parameters or assumptions. The central claim rests on domain assumptions about the physical modeling rather than new free parameters or invented entities.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The models are classical-field approximations of underlying many-body quantum systems
    Explicitly stated as a provision for the formalism in the abstract.
  • domain assumption Breathers are created from an initial elementary soliton by quenching the coupling constant
    Assumed when applying the formalism to the 2-soliton and 3-soliton cases.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5721 in / 1413 out tokens · 35677 ms · 2026-05-19T07:17:32.410685+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/RealityFromDistinction.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    We present a canonical formalism for computing quantum fluctuations of certain discrete degrees of freedom in systems governed by integrable partial differential equations with known Hamiltonian structure... apply the formalism to both the 2-soliton and 3-soliton breather solutions of the nonlinear Schrödinger equation, assuming the breathers are created from an initial elementary soliton by quenching the coupling constant.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    the perturbation will be a quantum operator, δx̂... δQ_i = sum (∂Q_i/∂q_j δq_j + ∂Q_i/∂p_j δp_j) ... inverted via direct conditions for canonical transformations and Lagrange brackets

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 53 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    As is customary, we will sometimes refer to these as the ‘old’ and ‘new’ sets, or denote them by(𝑞, 𝑝 ) and (𝑄, 𝑃 ), respectively

    Quantities of interest: fluctuations Let {𝑞𝑖, 𝑝𝑖 } 𝑁 𝑖=1 and {𝑄𝑖, 𝑃𝑖 } 𝑁 𝑖=1 be two sets of canonical co- ordinates and their conjugate momenta, related by a canonical transformation. As is customary, we will sometimes refer to these as the ‘old’ and ‘new’ sets, or denote them by(𝑞, 𝑝 ) and (𝑄, 𝑃 ), respectively. For simplicity, we will assume that all ca...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Then we have the follow- ing ‘direct conditions’ for all𝑖, 𝑗 = 1,

    Direct conditions for a canonical transformation As before, suppose we are given two sets of canonical coor- dinates and their conjugate momenta, (𝑞, 𝑝 ) and (𝑄, 𝑃 ), re- lated by a canonical transformation. Then we have the follow- ing ‘direct conditions’ for all𝑖, 𝑗 = 1, . . . , 𝑁 (see Eq. (9.48) in [26]): 𝜕𝑄 𝑖 𝜕𝑞 𝑗 = 𝜕 𝑝 𝑗 𝜕𝑃 𝑖 𝜕𝑄 𝑖 𝜕 𝑝 𝑗 = − 𝜕𝑞 𝑗 𝜕𝑃 𝑖...

    work page

  3. [3]

    (30) and (31))

    Lagrange brackets Because we will be employing the ‘inverted’ partial deriva- tives, it is the Lagrange brackets, rather than the Poisson brackets, that will naturally appear in our calculations (for example, in the derivations of Eqs. (30) and (31)). We now briefly review their definition, following Sec. 9.5 of [26]. Let {𝑞𝑖, 𝑝 𝑖 } 𝑁 𝑖=1, or (𝑞, 𝑝 ) for ...

    work page

  4. [4]

    (2) to Eq

    Fluctuations in terms of inverted partial derivatives Applying the ‘direct conditions’ of Eq. (2) to Eq. (1), the latter becomes 𝛿𝑄𝑖 = − 𝑁∑︁ 𝑗=1 𝜕𝑞 𝑗 𝜕𝑃 𝑖 𝛿 𝑝𝑗 − 𝜕 𝑝 𝑗 𝜕𝑃 𝑖 𝛿𝑞 𝑗 , 𝛿𝑃𝑖 = 𝑁∑︁ 𝑗=1 𝜕𝑞 𝑗 𝜕𝑄 𝑖 𝛿 𝑝𝑗 − 𝜕 𝑝 𝑗 𝜕𝑄 𝑖 𝛿𝑞 𝑗 . (5) This is the form that will enable us to evaluate the fluctuations 𝛿𝑄𝑖 and 𝛿𝑃𝑖. As an illustration of the properties of the L...

    work page

  5. [5]

    2-soliton breather We will now directly compute the initial quantum fluctu- ations of the 2-soliton breather using the formalism we have developed, and show that we can recover the values reported in

    work page

  6. [6]

    The 2-soliton breather is created by a 4-fold quench of the coupling constant 𝑔

    obtained by much more computationally taxing methods. The 2-soliton breather is created by a 4-fold quench of the coupling constant 𝑔. At the initial time, 𝑡 = 0, the mother soliton is converted into two daughter solitons with mass ratios of 1 : 3. As explained before, the daughter solitons are ‘born cold’, with zero initial relative velocity, although th...

    work page

  7. [7]

    To compare our results to the previously reported results, it is necessary to express the COM and relative parameters in terms of the conjugate pairs from

    presents the results for soliton fluctuations in a 2-soliton breather in terms of the center-of-mass (COM) parameters (represented in capital letters) and the relative parameters (rep- resented in lowercase letters). To compare our results to the previously reported results, it is necessary to express the COM and relative parameters in terms of the conjug...

    work page

  8. [8]

    These expressions are summa- rized in Table III with dimensionality restored

    we have been working in. These expressions are summa- rized in Table III with dimensionality restored. In order to use the fluctuations in the canonical variables to compute the fluctuations in other systems of parameters, we COM or rela- tive parameter Equivalent in canonical coordinates 𝑁 𝜌1+𝜌2 ℏ 𝑉 𝑝1𝜌1+ 𝑝2𝜌2 2𝑚 ¯𝑥 (𝜌1+𝜌2 ) 𝐵 2 ¯𝑥ℏ(𝑞1+𝑞2 ) 𝜌1+𝜌2 Θ − (𝜌1...

    work page

  9. [9]

    As a demonstration, we also present initial fluctuations for the 3-soliton breather

    3-soliton breather Because canonical formalism reduces the computational complexity, it is possible to push beyond the results already obtained in [21]. As a demonstration, we also present initial fluctuations for the 3-soliton breather. The 3-soliton breather is created by a 9-fold quench of the coupling constant, and at 𝑡 = 0 the mother soliton converts...

    work page

  10. [10]

    Results for the initial fluctuations of the canonical parameters are presented in Table VI for the 2-soliton breather, and in Table VII for the 3- soliton breather

    Results The initial conditions for the canonical parameters of both the 2-soliton breather and the 3-soliton breather are still those listed in Table I and Table IV, respectively. Results for the initial fluctuations of the canonical parameters are presented in Table VI for the 2-soliton breather, and in Table VII for the 3- soliton breather. Using the re...

    work page

  11. [11]

    C. S. Gardner, J. M. Greene, M. D. Kruskal, and R. M. Miura, Method for solving the Korteweg-deVries equation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 19, 1095 (1967)

    work page 1967

  12. [12]

    M. J. Ablowitz, D. J. Kaup, A. C. Newell, and H. Segur, Method for solving the Sine-Gordon equation, Phys. Rev. Lett.30, 1262 (1973). 12

    work page 1973

  13. [13]

    M. J. Ablowitz and H. Segur,Solitons and the Inverse Scattering Transform (SIAM, Philadelphia, 1981)

    work page 1981

  14. [14]

    M. J. Ablowitz, D. J. Kaup, A. C. Newell, and H. Segur, The inverse scattering transform-fourier analysis for nonlinear prob- lems, Studies in Applied Mathematics 53, 249 (1974)

    work page 1974

  15. [15]

    Novikov, S

    S. Novikov, S. V. Manakov, L. P. Pitaevskii, and V. E. Zakharov, Theory of Solitons: The Inverse Scattering Method (Mono- graphs in Contemporary Mathematics) (Consultants Bureau,

    work page

  16. [16]

    P. D. Lax, Integrals of nonlinear equations of evolution and soli- tary waves, Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics 21, 467 (1968)

    work page 1968

  17. [17]

    solitons

    N. J. Zabusky and M. D. Kruskal, Interaction of “solitons” in a collisionless plasma and the recurrence of initial states, Phys. Rev. Lett.15, 240 (1965)

    work page 1965

  18. [18]

    J. J. Mazo and A. V. Ustinov, The sine-Gordon equation in Josephson-junction arrays, in The sine-Gordon Model and its Applications: From Pendula and Josephson Junctions to Grav- ity and High-Energy Physics, edited by J. Cuevas-Maraver, P. G. Kevrekidis, and F. Williams (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2014) pp. 155–175

    work page 2014

  19. [19]

    Malomed, Nonlinear schr ¨odinger equations, inEncyclopedia of Nonlinear Science, edited by A

    B. Malomed, Nonlinear schr ¨odinger equations, inEncyclopedia of Nonlinear Science, edited by A. Scott (Routledge, New York,

    work page

  20. [20]

    Hasegawa and F

    A. Hasegawa and F. Tappert, Transmission of stationary nonlin- ear optical pulses in dispersive dielectric fibers. I. Anomalous dispersion, Appl. Phys. Lett 23, 142 (1973)

    work page 1973

  21. [21]

    H. A. Haus and W. S. Wong, Solitons in optical communications, Rev. Mod. Phys.68, 423 (1996)

    work page 1996

  22. [22]

    Lai and H

    Y. Lai and H. A. Haus, Quantum theory of solitons in optical fibers. I. Time-dependent Hartree approximation, Phys. Rev. A 40, 844 (1989)

    work page 1989

  23. [23]

    Lai and H

    Y. Lai and H. A. Haus, Quantum theory of solitons in optical fibers. II. Exact solution, Phys. Rev. A40, 854 (1989)

    work page 1989

  24. [24]

    K. E. Strecker, G. B. Partridge, A. G. Truscott, and R. G. Hulet, Bright matter wave solitons in Bose–Einstein condensates, New J. Phys. 5, 73 (2003)

    work page 2003

  25. [27]

    Bogolubov, On the theory of superfluidity, J

    N. Bogolubov, On the theory of superfluidity, J. Phys. (USSR) XI, 23 (1947)

    work page 1947

  26. [28]

    H. A. Haus and Y. Lai, Quantum theory of soliton squeezing: a linearized approach, J. Opt. Soc. Am B 7, 386 (1990)

    work page 1990

  27. [29]

    Lai, Quantum theory of soliton propagation: a unified ap- proach based on the linearization approximation, J

    Y. Lai, Quantum theory of soliton propagation: a unified ap- proach based on the linearization approximation, J. Opt. Soc. Am B 10, 475 (1993)

    work page 1993

  28. [30]

    Yeang, Quantum theory of a second-order soliton based on a linearization approximation, J

    C.-P. Yeang, Quantum theory of a second-order soliton based on a linearization approximation, J. Opt. Soc. Am B 16, 1269 (1999)

    work page 1999

  29. [31]

    O. V. Marchukov, B. A. Malomed, V. Dunjko, J. Ruhl, M. Ol- shanii, R. G. Hulet, and V. A. Yurovsky, Quantum fluctua- tions of the center of mass and relative parameters of nonlinear schr¨odinger breathers, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 050405 (2020)

    work page 2020

  30. [32]

    Castin, Internal structure of a quantum soliton and classical excitations due to trap opening, Eur

    Y. Castin, Internal structure of a quantum soliton and classical excitations due to trap opening, Eur. Phys. J. B68, 317 (2009)

    work page 2009

  31. [33]

    C. W. Gardiner, Particle-number-conserving Bogoliubov method which demonstrates the validity of the time-dependent Gross-Pitaevskii equation for a highly condensed Bose gas, Phys. Rev. A56, 1414 (1997)

    work page 1997

  32. [34]

    Castin and R

    Y. Castin and R. Dum, Low-temperature Bose-Einstein con- densates in time-dependent traps: Beyond the 𝑈 (1) symmetry- breaking approach, Phys. Rev. A57, 3008 (1998)

    work page 1998

  33. [35]

    Sinatra, Y

    A. Sinatra, Y. Castin, and E. Witkowska, Nondiffusive phase spreading of a Bose-Einstein condensate at finite temperature, Phys. Rev. A75, 033616 (2007)

    work page 2007

  34. [36]

    Goldstein, C

    H. Goldstein, C. P. Poole, and J. L. Safko, Classical mechanics, 3rd ed. (Addison-Wesley, San Francisco, 2002)

    work page 2002

  35. [37]

    Sterman, An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory (Cam- bridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., 1993)

    G. Sterman, An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory (Cam- bridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., 1993)

    work page 1993

  36. [38]

    Although the direct conditions are derived in [26] under the assumption of a restricted canonical transformation (i.e., one without explicit time dependence), these conditions in fact hold for any canonical transformation, restricted or not. The reason is that they are merely a rewriting of the symplectic condition for a canonical transformation, and that...

    work page

  37. [39]

    Huang, Statistical Mechanics, 2nd ed

    K. Huang, Statistical Mechanics, 2nd ed. (Wiley, New York, 1987)

    work page 1987

  38. [40]

    V. E. Korepin, N. M. Bogoliubov, and A. G. Izergin, Quantum Inverse Scattering Method and Correlation Functions (Cam- bridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997)

    work page 1997

  39. [41]

    E. H. Lieb and W. Liniger, Exact analysis of an interacting Bose gas. I. The general solution and the ground state, Phys. Rev.130, 1605 (1963)

    work page 1963

  40. [42]

    V. A. Yurovsky, B. A. Malomed, R. G. Hulet, and M. Ol- shanii, Dissociation of one-dimensional matter-wave breathers due to quantum many-body effects, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 220401 (2017)

    work page 2017

  41. [43]

    K. E. Strecker, G. B. Partridge, A. G. Truscott, and R. G. Hulet, Formation and propagation of matter-wave soliton trains, Nature (London) 417, 150 (2002)

    work page 2002

  42. [44]

    Khaykovich, F

    L. Khaykovich, F. Schreck, G. Ferrari, T. Bourdel, J. Cubizolles, L. D. Carr, Y. Castin, and C. Salomon, Formation of a matter- wave bright soliton, Science 296, 1290 (2002)

    work page 2002

  43. [45]

    V. A. Yurovsky, M. Olshanii, and D. S. Weiss, Collisions, corre- lations, and integrability in atom waveguides (Academic Press,

    work page

  44. [46]

    Olshanii, Atomic scattering in the presence of an external confinement and a gas of impenetrable bosons, Phys

    M. Olshanii, Atomic scattering in the presence of an external confinement and a gas of impenetrable bosons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 938 (1998)

    work page 1998

  45. [47]

    C. Chin, R. Grimm, P. Julienne, and E. Tiesinga, Feshbach resonances in ultracold gases, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 1225 (2010)

    work page 2010

  46. [48]

    Dunjko, V

    V. Dunjko, V. Lorent, and M. Olshanii, Bosons in cigar-shaped traps: Thomas-Fermi regime, Tonks-Girardeau regime, and in between, Phys. Rev. Lett.86, 5413 (2001)

    work page 2001

  47. [49]

    A. J. Leggett, Bose-Einstein condensation in the alkali gases: Some fundamental concepts, Rev. Mod. Phys.73, 307 (2001)

    work page 2001

  48. [50]

    L. D. Faddeev and L. Takhtajan, Hamiltonian Methods in the Theory of Solitons (Springer, Berlin, 2007)

    work page 2007

  49. [51]

    Satsuma and N

    J. Satsuma and N. Yajima, Initial value problems of one- dimensional self-modulation of nonlinear waves in dispersive media, Supp. Progr. Theor. Phys.55, 284 (1974)

    work page 1974

  50. [52]

    Di Carli, C

    A. Di Carli, C. D. Colquhoun, G. Henderson, S. Flannigan, G.- L. Oppo, A. J. Daley, S. Kuhr, and E. Haller, Excitation modes of bright matter-wave solitons, Physical Review Letters 123, 10.1103/physrevlett.123.123602 (2019)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.123.123602 2019

  51. [53]

    V. E. Zakharov and A. B. Shabat, Exact theory of two- dimensional self-focusing and one-dimensional self-modulation of waves in nonlinear media, J. Exp. Theor. Phys.34 (1972)

    work page 1972

  52. [54]

    J. P. Gordon, Interaction forces among solitons in optical fibers, Opt. Lett. 8, 596 (1983). 13

    work page 1983

  53. [55]

    D. J. Kaup, Perturbation theory for solitons in optical fibers, Phys. Rev. A42, 5689 (1990)

    work page 1990