Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 72 references

Shifted Pitt and uncertainty inequalities on Riemannian symmetric spaces of noncompact type

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper introduces a shifted Pitt inequality and proves sharp characterizations of admissible polynomial weights on rank-one symmetric spaces and for Jacobi transforms.

desk verdict Genuinely new shifted Pitt inequality with sharp Jacobi characterizations; the general symmetric-space theorem is conditional on two same-author preprints. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.22792 v1 pith:5QVLZ6S3 submitted 2025-06-28 math.FA math.CA

Tapendu Rana , Michael Ruzhansky This is my paper
classification math.FAmath.CA MSC 43A8542A3822E3043A90
keywords Pitt'sinequalityHeisenberg–Pauli–WeylJacobitransformuncertaintyprincipleRiemanniansymmetricspacesspectralgapmixed-norminterpolationpolynomialweights
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper introduces a shifted Pitt inequality for Riemannian symmetric spaces of noncompact type and for Jacobi transforms: the Fourier-side weight $|\xi|^\sigma$ is replaced by $(|\lambda|^2+\zeta^2)^{\sigma/2}$, matching the spectral gap of the Laplace–Beltrami operator. The central claim is that, for $\zeta>0$ and $1

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the shifted Fourier weight $(|\lambda|^2+\zeta^2)^{-\sigma/2}$ paired with the Plancherel density $|c(\lambda)|^{-2}$ and the mixed norm on the Fourier side, where one first integrates over the boundary $B=K/M$ and then over the Euclidean space $\mathfrak a$. Because the bottom of the $L^2$-spectrum of the Laplace–Beltrami operator is $|\rho|^2$, this weight is exactly the symbol of the fractional shifted Laplacian $(-L+|\rho|^2)^{\sigma/2}$, which is why the shift is intrinsic. The proof interpolates a Hardy–Littlewood–Paley inequality (Lemma 3.1) with an $L^2$ shifted weighted inequality (Lemma 3.3) through a mixed-norm interpolation lemma; in the Jacobi setting, the authors first modify the transform by multiplying the function by the spherical function $\varphi_0$ so that the associated measure has polynomial growth, then use rearrangement estimates for the resulting polynomial weights to make the sufficient and necessary regions coincide.

What would settle it

Check whether the mixed-norm Paley inequality (Theorem 2.2) holds for a concrete higher-rank symmetric space with $n>\nu$, such as $SL(3,\mathbb R)/SO(3)$, over the full range $1<p\le 2$; a single counterexample would invalidate the sufficiency proof of the shifted Pitt inequality. Alternatively, test Lemma 3.3's claimed if-and-only-if for $\zeta>0$ by substituting a one-parameter family of test functions supported near the origin; if the asserted necessity fails for $p<2$, the sharp characterization in Corollary 1.4 collapses.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central discovery is that the shifted weight $(|\lambda|^2+\zeta^2)^{-\sigma/2}$ repairs the mismatch between the local and asymptotic behaviour of the Plancherel density $|c(\lambda)|^{-2}$: near the origin this density behaves like $|\lambda|^{\nu-1}$, at infinity like $|\lambda|^{n-1}$, and the two behaviours force incompatible constraints on the unshifted weight $|\lambda|^{-\sigma}$. For $\zeta\ne 0$ the singularity at $\lambda=0$ disappears, so the only remaining constraints are the function-side integrability condition $\kappa<n/p'$ and the balance inequality $\sigma-\kappa\ge n(1/p+1/q-1)$. Theorem 1.2 proves sufficiency of these conditions for $1<p\le q\le p'$, $p\le 2$ on every noncompact symmetric space with $n\ge 2$, $\nu\ge 3$, and proves necessity in rank one; Corollary 4.19 gives the full if-and-only-if statement for Jacobi transforms, namely $p\le 2$, $\sigma-\kappa\ge 2(\alpha+1)(1/p+1/q-1)$ and $\kappa p'<2(\alpha+1)$.

Load-bearing premise

The sufficiency proof of Theorem 1.2 imports two endpoint inequalities from companion preprints — an if-and-only-if shifted $L^2$ inequality and a mixed-norm Paley inequality — and if either fails in the stated parameter range on general noncompact symmetric spaces, the interpolation argument collapses.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In rank one — in particular on hyperbolic spaces — the admissible region for $\zeta>0$ is exactly $p\le 2$, $\kappa p'<n$, and $\sigma-\kappa\ge n(1/p+1/q-1)$; no other polynomial weights work.
  • For the standard Jacobi transform the same region with $n$ replaced by $2(\alpha+1)$ is if-and-only-if, so the shifted inequality is fully characterized for $1<p\le q\le p'$.
  • The shift removes the obstruction that makes the unshifted Hardy–Littlewood–Paley and Pitt inequalities fail when the pseudo-dimension is smaller than the dimension.
  • The shifted Pitt inequality implies $L^2$ Heisenberg–Pauli–Weyl inequalities for modified Laplacians $L_{p_0}=L+(|\rho|^2-|\rho_{p_0}|^2)I$ with arbitrary $\gamma,\delta>0$, recovering and extending earlier symmetric-space results.
  • The $L^p$ Heisenberg–Pauli–Weyl inequality holds on symmetric spaces for any $\sigma\ge\delta$ with $p,r\in(p_0,p_0')$, generalizing the stratified-group result of [CCR15] and giving a Landau–Kolmogorov step in the proof.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The enlargement of the admissible region when $\zeta>0$ suggests that the Euclidean balance condition $\sigma-\kappa=N(1/p+1/q-1)$ is a special effect of dilation invariance; on any space whose Laplacian has a spectral gap one should expect an open region of admissible weights, with $(|\lambda|^2+\zeta^2)^{\sigma/2}$ as the natural universal choice.
  • The same mixed-norm interpolation could likely characterize the shifted inequality on all noncompact symmetric spaces, not just rank one, if the two imported endpoint inequalities are verified in full generality; a natural test case is $SL(3,\mathbb R)/SO(3)$ or a product of hyperbolic planes.
  • The modified-Jacobi trick of absorbing the exponential growth into $\varphi_0$ so the measure becomes polynomial is a transferable method: sharp shifted Pitt inequalities for other spherical transforms should follow once the analogous $\varphi_0$ estimates are available.
  • The paper leaves $p>2$ and $q>p'$ to future work; one could test whether exponential weights on the function side restore Pitt-type inequalities in that range, as the concluding remarks suggest but do not prove.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper introduces shifted Pitt inequalities on Riemannian symmetric spaces of noncompact type and on Jacobi transforms, motivated by the spectral gap of the Laplace--Beltrami operator. The main result, Theorem 1.2, gives sufficient conditions for a mixed-norm shifted Pitt inequality (1.8) on general symmetric spaces, with a converse in rank one under the range p ≤ q ≤ p'. In the Jacobi setting, the authors modify the transform to obtain polynomial volume growth and then use rearrangement methods to prove sharp sufficient conditions (Theorem 4.11 and Theorem 4.12) that coincide with their necessary conditions (Theorems 4.5--4.9), yielding the full characterization in Corollary 4.14 and Corollary 4.19. The paper also derives L^2 and L^p Heisenberg--Pauli--Weyl uncertainty inequalities, including a generalization of the Ciatti--Cowling--Ricci theorem, via shifted Pitt inequalities and Landau--Kolmogorov type estimates.

Significance. If the results are fully verified, the paper makes a substantial contribution: it introduces a geometrically natural shifted Pitt inequality, enlarges the admissible parameter region relative to the Euclidean case, and gives sharp characterizations in the Jacobi and rank-one settings. The explicit use of c-function asymptotics, mixed-norm interpolation, and rearrangement estimates is methodologically valuable. The applications to HPW uncertainty inequalities, especially the L^p version in Theorem 1.6, are of independent interest. However, the central proofs rely on several endpoint inequalities imported from overlapping-author preprints ([KRZ23], [RR24]) without independent verification, and Lemma 3.1 contains a proof gap that affects the displayed exponent ranges; these issues must be resolved before the claims can be accepted as fully proven.

major comments (3)
  1. [§2.2 and §3 (Lemma 3.3, Theorem 2.2, Theorem 1.2)] The proof of Theorem 1.2 is not self-contained. Lemma 3.3 is imported as an if-and-only-if statement from [KRZ23, Theorem 1.2], Theorem 2.2 is imported from [RR24, Theorem 1.9], and the restriction estimate (2.6) is imported from [RR24, Theorem 1.8]; all three are preprints by overlapping author sets. The mixed-norm interpolation in the proof of Theorem 1.2 uses exactly the endpoint ranges of these results, so if any of the imported statements fails in the stated ranges, the sufficiency conclusion (3.11) does not follow. The authors should either provide proofs of these inputs, replace them by published versions, or explicitly list them as standing assumptions in the main theorems.
  2. [§3, Lemma 3.1] The proof of Lemma 3.1 does not establish the stated exponent range. The distribution-function computation gives the weak-type condition (3.2) for n ≤ σ ≤ ν when ζ = 0 and for σ ≥ n when ζ > 0, but the lemma claims the ranges n(2/p − 1) ≤ σ ≤ ν(2/p − 1) and σ ≥ n(2/p − 1), respectively. The passage from the weak-type condition to these weaker thresholds is not justified in the text; it would require an additional interpolation argument between the p = 1 restriction estimate and the L^2 Plancherel inequality, which is absent. Since (3.4) is invoked at these weaker thresholds in the proof of Theorem 1.2, this gap is load-bearing and should be repaired.
  3. [§5, Theorem 1.6 and Lemma 5.4] Theorem 1.6, a headline application, depends on Lemma 5.4 imported from [KRZ23, Theorem 1.2] for Hardy-type inequalities for modified Laplacians. Together with the Landau--Kolmogorov estimate (5.15) cited from published sources, this lemma supplies a crucial ingredient in the proof; if the range of Lemma 5.4 changes, the conclusion of Theorem 1.6 may fail. The authors should either prove Lemma 5.4 in this paper or replace the dependence on the preprint with a verifiable published result.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§3, proof of Theorem 1.2, ζ = 0 Case I] The text says 'we can choose any r ∈ (1, ∞)', but since the Hardy--Littlewood--Paley inequality (3.12) is stated for 1 < r ≤ 2 and the interpolation target satisfies p ≤ 2, the correct range is r ∈ (1, p).
  2. [§4.4, Theorem 4.16] The sufficiency direction for 1 < p ≤ q ≤ p′ in Corollary 4.19 is only sketched: the text verifies the implication (4.57) to (4.74) but does not explicitly check that the hypotheses of Theorem 4.11, in particular condition (4.39), are automatically satisfied when q ≤ p′. A short verification should be included for completeness.
  3. [§4.2, Theorem 4.5] The test functions in (4.18), (4.21), and (4.24) are not compactly supported smooth functions, so the invocation of a 'standard density argument' should be made precise, especially because the necessary conditions are derived by inserting singular test functions into an inequality initially stated for C_c^∞(R+).
  4. [References] The references [KPRS24] and [RR24] are cited as preprints; if published versions are available at the time of the revision, they should be updated.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

Theorem 1.2's q=2 endpoint is imported verbatim from an overlapping-author preprint; the full q-range is a genuine interpolation extension.

  1. self citation load bearing [Section 3, Lemma 3.3 and proof of Theorem 1.2, Cases I-III (Eqs. (3.3)-(3.11))]
    "We require the following lemma, which follows from [KRZ23, Theorem 1.2] by taking β = 0, q = 2, and ζ >0, and then applying the Plancherel theorem. Lemma 3.3. ... the inequality ... holds for 1 ≤ p ≤ 2 if and only if 0 ≤ κ ≤ σ, κ < n/p′ (when p = 1, κ = 0), and σ − κ ≥ n(1/p − 1/2)."

    For q=2, the claimed shifted Pitt inequality (1.8) is literally the same as (3.3): the LHS is (∫_a ∫_B |f̂(λ,b)|² (|λ|²+ζ²)^{−σ} |c(λ)|^{−2} db dλ)^{1/2}, and condition (1.9) with q=2 reduces to κ < n/p′ and σ−κ ≥ n(1/p−1/2), exactly the imported Lemma 3.3. The proof of Theorem 1.2 for p=q=2 does not derive this from scratch: Case I interpolates between (3.4) and (3.5), and at θ=1 it simply returns (3.5), i.e. Lemma 3.3. Thus the q=2 endpoint of the main theorem is an imported result from the same-author preprint [KRZ23], not an independent derivation. The q>2 cases are obtained by mixed-norm interpolation and are not contained in the cited input, so the reduction is partial rather than total circularity.

  2. self citation load bearing [Section 3, Lemma 3.1, proof via Theorem 2.2 from [RR24]]
    "We also recall from [RR24, Theorem 1.9] the following analogue of Paley's inequality ... in the context of noncompact type symmetric spaces. ... For a fixed ζ ≥ 0, let us consider uσ,ζ(λ) := (|λ|² + ζ²)^{−σ/2} ... Therefore, applying Theorem 2.2, we obtain the following inequality ..."

    Lemma 3.1, the Hardy-Littlewood-Paley endpoint used in the interpolation proof of Theorem 1.2, is not established from first principles here. The proof only checks a distribution-function condition for uσ,ζ and then invokes Theorem 2.2 verbatim. Since [RR24] is a preprint by the same two authors, this endpoint rests on an unverified self-citation. It is load-bearing because the range condition σ ≥ n(2/p−1) in (3.1) is exactly what feeds into the interpolated condition (3.11). It is not logically circular, because Theorem 2.2 is a different inequality (a weighted Paley/Plancherel estimate) and does not already contain the shifted Pitt statement for general q.

full rationale

No step fits the stronger circularity categories: there is no parameter fitted to data and renamed a prediction, no definition of a quantity in terms of the claimed conclusion, and no known empirical result merely relabelled. The Jacobi-transform results (Theorems 4.5-4.16 and Corollary 4.19) are derived from explicit test functions, rearrangement estimates for polynomial weights, and the modified Jacobi transform, so they are self-contained and externally checkable. The central concern is the sufficiency proof of Theorem 1.2: it interpolates between two endpoint inequalities imported from overlapping-author preprints. Lemma 3.3 is exactly the q=2 case of the target inequality, so the main theorem's q=2 endpoint is assumed rather than proved; Lemma 3.1 is a corollary of the same-authors' Paley inequality [RR24, Theorem 1.9]. For q>2, however, the mixed-norm interpolation genuinely extends the imported endpoints and produces new content, and the necessity part in rank one is proved in the paper. Accordingly, the score is 4: some load-bearing self-citation with independent content in the central claim, but not full circularity. This is a structural verification gap, not a reduction of the whole derivation to its inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No fitted parameters or invented entities appear. The proofs rest on standard Plancherel and Jacobi estimates plus several same-author preprint results, [KRZ23], [RR24], and [KPRS24], whose exact ranges are treated as axioms in this paper.

assumptions (5)
  • standard math Plancherel density estimate |c(lambda)|^{-2} is comparable to |lambda|^{nu-l}(1 + |lambda|)^{n-nu} (eq. 2.3), and Jacobi density asymptotics n(lambda) is comparable to lambda^2 near 0 and lambda^{2 alpha + 1} at infinity (eq. 4.8).
    These asymptotics determine which weight exponents are admissible; nearly every necessary and sufficient condition in Sections 3 and 4 reduces to them.
  • standard math Jacobi function comparison phi_lambda(t) is comparable to phi_0(t) for lambda t small (Lemma 4.4), and phi_0(t) is comparable to (1 + t) e^{-rho t} (eq. 4.3).
    The comparison lemma drives all necessity proofs in Theorems 4.5 through 4.9; the phi_0 estimate is used to pass from modified to standard Jacobi Pitt inequalities.
  • ad hoc to paper Lemma 3.3: for zeta > 0, the unshifted Pitt inequality (3.3) holds for 1 <= p <= 2 if and only if 0 <= kappa <= sigma, kappa < n/p', and sigma - kappa >= n(1/p - 1/2), imported from [KRZ23, Theorem 1.2].
    This is a load-bearing endpoint input for the interpolation proof of Theorem 1.2; the current paper does not reproduce its proof.
  • ad hoc to paper Theorem 2.2 mixed-norm Paley inequality on symmetric spaces, imported from [RR24, Theorem 1.9].
    Used to prove the Hardy-Littlewood-Paley lemma, Lemma 3.1, which is the first interpolation endpoint in Theorem 1.2.
  • domain assumption Mixed-norm Stein interpolation lemma, Lemma 2.4, extends to operators with shifted weights with the stated endpoint constants.
    The entire sufficient part of Theorem 1.2 is an application of this lemma; no independent verification of its hypotheses for the shifted weight operator is given here.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Shifted Pitt and uncertainty inequalities on Riemannian symmetric spaces of noncompact type." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/5QVLZ6S3

@misc{pith2026250622792,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Shifted Pitt and uncertainty inequalities on Riemannian symmetric spaces of noncompact type},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/5QVLZ6S3}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.22792}
}
abstract

Our primary objective is to study Pitt-type inequalities on Riemannian symmetric spaces $\mathbb{X}$ of noncompact type, as well as within the framework of Jacobi analysis. Inspired by the spectral gap of the Laplacian on $\mathbb{X}$, we introduce the notion of a \textit{shifted} Pitt's inequality as a natural and intrinsic analogue tailored to symmetric spaces, capturing key aspects of the underlying non-Euclidean geometry. In the rank one case (in particular, for hyperbolic spaces), we show that the sufficient condition for the \textit{shifted} Pitt's inequality matches the necessary condition in the range $p \leq q \leq p'$, yielding a sharp characterization of admissible polynomial weights with non-negative exponents. In the Jacobi setting, we modify the transform so that the associated measure exhibits polynomial volume growth. This modification enables us to fully characterize the class of polynomial weights with non-negative exponents for which Pitt-type inequalities hold for the modified Jacobi transforms. As applications of the \textit{shifted} Pitt's inequalities, we derive $L^2$-type Heisenberg-Pauli-Weyl uncertainty inequalities and further establish generalized $L^p$ versions. Moreover, the geometric structure of symmetric spaces allows us to formulate a broader version of the uncertainty inequalities previously obtained by Ciatti-Cowling-Ricci in the setting of stratified Lie groups.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.22792 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Admissible regions of σ and κ for Pitt-type inequality on X, given 1 < p ≤ 2 and p < q < p′ . Corollary 1.4. Let X be a rank one symmetric space of noncompact type (in particular, hyperbolic space) with dimension n ≥ 2. Suppose that 1 < p ≤ q ≤ p ′ and κ ≥ 0, σ ∈ R. Then the shifted Pitt’s inequality (1.8) holds for ζ > 0 if and only if p ≤ 2 and (1.9) holds. In [KPRS24], motivated by the work of Heinig [Hei84], the… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Admissible regions of σ and κ for shifted and unshifted Pitt’s inequality for the modified Jacobi transform J˜. Here N := 2(α + 1). Remark 4.15. The result of the Corollary 4.14 is illustrated in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p034_2.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

72 extracted references · 71 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Anker, E

    J.-Ph. Anker, E. Damek, and C. Yacoub. Spherical analysis on harmonic AN groups. Ann. Scuola Norm. Sup. Pisa Cl. Sci. (4) , 23(4):643--679 (1997), 1996

    work page 1997

  2. [2]

    J.-Ph. Anker. L _p F ourier multipliers on R iemannian symmetric spaces of the noncompact type. Ann. of Math. (2) , 132(3):597--628, 1990

    work page 1990

  3. [3]

    J.-Ph. Anker. Sharp estimates for some functions of the L aplacian on noncompact symmetric spaces. Duke Math. J. , 65(2):257--297, 1992

    work page 1992

  4. [4]

    W. Beckner. Pitt's inequality and the uncertainty principle. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. , 123(6):1897--1905, 1995

    work page 1905

  5. [5]

    W. Beckner. Pitt's inequality with sharp convolution estimates. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. , 136(5):1871--1885, 2008

    work page 2008

  6. [6]

    W. Beckner. Pitt's inequality and the fractional L aplacian: sharp error estimates. Forum Math. , 24(1):177--209, 2012

    work page 2012

  7. [7]

    J. J. Benedetto and H. P. Heinig. Weighted F ourier inequalities: new proofs and generalizations. J. Fourier Anal. Appl. , 9(1):1--37, 2003

    work page 2003

  8. [8]

    Benedek and R

    A. Benedek and R. Panzone. The space L p , with mixed norm. Duke Math. J. , 28:301--324, 1961

    work page 1961

Show all 72 references
  1. [9]

    Bhowmik and S

    M. Bhowmik and S. Pusti. An extension problem and H ardy's inequality for the fractional L aplace- B eltrami operator on R iemannian symmetric spaces of noncompact type. J. Funct. Anal. , 282(9):Paper No. 109413, 40, 2022

    2022

  2. [10]

    Bhowmik, S

    M. Bhowmik, S. Pusti, and S. K. Ray. Theorems of I ngham and C hernoff on R iemannian symmetric spaces of noncompact type. J. Funct. Anal. , 279(11):108760, 30, 2020

    2020

  3. [11]

    Bhowmik, S

    M. Bhowmik, S. Pusti, and S. K. Ray. A theorem of C hernoff on quasi-analytic functions for R iemannian symmetric spaces. Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN , (13):10942--10963, 2023

    2023

  4. [12]

    J. S. Bradley. Hardy inequalities with mixed norms. Canad. Math. Bull. , 21(4):405--408, 1978

    1978

  5. [13]

    O. Brammen. Uncertainty principles on harmonic manifolds of rank one. Preprint, arXiv.2408.16324 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Ciatti, M

    P. Ciatti, M. G. Cowling, and F. Ricci. Hardy and uncertainty inequalities on stratified L ie groups. Adv. Math. , 277:365--387, 2015

    2015

  7. [15]

    Cowling, S

    M. Cowling, S. Giulini, and S. Meda. L^p - L^q estimates for functions of the L aplace- B eltrami operator on noncompact symmetric spaces. I . Duke Math. J. , 72(1):109--150, 1993

    1993

  8. [16]

    M. G. Cowling and J. F. Price. Bandwidth versus time concentration: the H eisenberg- P auli- W eyl inequality. SIAM J. Math. Anal. , 15(1):151--165, 1984

    1984

  9. [17]

    Ciatti, F

    P. Ciatti, F. Ricci, and M. Sundari. Uncertainty inequalities on stratified nilpotent groups. Bull. Kerala Math. Assoc. , pages 53--72, 2005

    2005

  10. [18]

    Ciatti, F

    P. Ciatti, F. Ricci, and M. Sundari. Heisenberg- P auli- W eyl uncertainty inequalities and polynomial volume growth. Adv. Math. , 215(2):616--625, 2007

    2007

  11. [19]

    De Carli

    L. De Carli. On the L^p - L^q norm of the H ankel transform and related operators. J. Math. Anal. Appl. , 348(1):366--382, 2008

    2008

  12. [20]

    De Carli, D

    L. De Carli, D. Gorbachev, and S. Yu. Tikhonov. Pitt inequalities and restriction theorems for the F ourier transform. Rev. Mat. Iberoam. , 33(3):789--808, 2017

    2017

  13. [21]

    Debernardi

    A. Debernardi. Weighted norm inequalities for generalized F ourier-type transforms and applications. Publ. Mat. , 64(1):3--42, 2020

    2020

  14. [22]

    A. X. Do, D. Ganguly, N. Lam, and G. Lu. Scale-dependent P oincar\' e inequalities, log- S obolev inequality and the stability of the H eisenberg uncertainty principle on the hyperbolic space, 2025

    2025

  15. [23]

    G. M. Dall'Ara and D. Trevisan. Uncertainty inequalities on groups and homogeneous spaces via isoperimetric inequalities. J. Geom. Anal. , 25(4):2262--2283, 2015

    2015

  16. [24]

    Flensted-Jensen and T

    M. Flensted-Jensen and T. Koornwinder. The convolution structure for J acobi function expansions. Ark. Mat. , 11:245--262, 1973

    1973

  17. [25]

    G. B. Folland and A. Sitaram. The uncertainty principle: a mathematical survey. J. Fourier Anal. Appl. , 3(3):207--238, 1997

    1997

  18. [26]

    Fu and J

    X. Fu and J. Xiao. An uncertainty principle on the L orentz spaces. Nonlinear Anal. , 237:Paper No. 113367, 21, 2023

    2023

  19. [27]

    D. V. Gorbachev, V. I. Ivanov, and S. Yu. Tikhonov. Pitt's inequalities and uncertainty principle for generalized F ourier transform. Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN , (23):7179--7200, 2016

    2016

  20. [28]

    Gorbachev, E

    D. Gorbachev, E. Liflyand, and S. Yu. Tikhonov. Weighted norm inequalities for integral transforms. Indiana Univ. Math. J. , 67(5):1949--2003, 2018

    1949

  21. [29]

    Ganguly, R

    P. Ganguly, R. Manna, and S. Thangavelu. On a theorem of C hernoff on rank one R iemannian symmetric spaces. J. Funct. Anal. , 282(5):Paper No. 109351, 31, 2022

    2022

  22. [30]

    Ganguly and J

    P. Ganguly and J. Sarkar. L^p - H eisenberg-- P auli-- W eyl uncertainty inequalities on certain two-step nilpotent lie groups, 2025

    2025

  23. [31]

    Ganguly and S

    P. Ganguly and S. Thangavelu. An uncertainty principle for spectral projections on rank one symmetric spaces of noncompact type. Ann. Mat. Pura Appl. (4) , 201(1):289--311, 2022

    2022

  24. [32]

    Gangolli and V

    R. Gangolli and V. S. Varadarajan. Harmonic analysis of spherical functions on real reductive groups , volume 101 of Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete [Results in Mathematics and Related Areas] . Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1988

    1988

  25. [33]

    Spherical functions on a semisimple L ie group

    Harish-Chandra. Spherical functions on a semisimple L ie group. I . Amer. J. Math. , 80:241--310, 1958

    1958

  26. [34]

    Heisenberg

    W. Heisenberg. Über den anschaulichen inhalt der quantentheoretischen kinematik und mechanik. Z. Physik , 43:172–198, 1927

    1927

  27. [35]

    H. P. Heinig. Weighted norm inequalities for classes of operators. Indiana Univ. Math. J. , 33(4):573--582, 1984

    1984

  28. [36]

    Helgason

    S. Helgason. Groups and geometric analysis , volume 83 of Mathematical Surveys and Monographs . American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2000. Integral geometry, invariant differential operators, and spherical functions, Corrected reprint of the 1984 original

    2000

  29. [37]

    Helgason

    S. Helgason. Geometric analysis on symmetric spaces , volume 39 of Mathematical Surveys and Monographs . American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, second edition, 2008

    2008

  30. [38]

    H \" o rmander

    L. H \" o rmander. Estimates for translation invariant operators in L^ p spaces. Acta Math. , 104:93--140, 1960

    1960

  31. [39]

    A. D. Ionescu. Singular integrals on symmetric spaces of real rank one. Duke Math. J. , 114(1):101--122, 2002

    2002

  32. [40]

    A. D. Ionescu. Singular integrals on symmetric spaces. II . Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. , 355(8):3359--3378, 2003

    2003

  33. [41]

    T. R. Johansen. Weighted inequalities and uncertainty principles for the (k,a) -generalized F ourier transform. Internat. J. Math. , 27(3):1650019, 44, 2016

    2016

  34. [42]

    W. B. Jurkat and G. Sampson. On rearrangement and weight inequalities for the F ourier transform. Indiana Univ. Math. J. , 33(2):257--270, 1984

    1984

  35. [43]

    Jodeit, Jr

    M. Jodeit, Jr. and A. Torchinsky. Inequalities for F ourier transforms. Studia Math. , 37:245--276, 1970/71

    1970

  36. [44]

    E.H. Kennard. Zur quantenmechanik einfacher bewegungstypen. Z. Physik , 44:326–352, 1927

    1927

  37. [45]

    Kassymov, V

    A. Kassymov, V. Kumar, and M. Ruzhansky. Functional inequalities on symmetric spaces of noncompact type and applications. J. Geom. Anal. , 34(7):Paper No. 208, 41, 2024

    2024

  38. [46]

    Kolmogoroff

    A. Kolmogoroff. On inequalities between upper bounds of consecutive derivatives of an arbitrary function defined on an infinite interval. Uchenye Zapiski Moskov. Gos. Univ. Matematika , 30:3--16, 1939

    1939

  39. [47]

    Koornwinder

    T. Koornwinder. A new proof of a P aley- W iener type theorem for the J acobi transform. Ark. Mat. , 13:145--159, 1975

    1975

  40. [48]

    T. H. Koornwinder. Jacobi functions and analysis on noncompact semisimple L ie groups. In Special functions: group theoretical aspects and applications , Math. Appl., pages 1--85. Reidel, Dordrecht, 1984

    1984

  41. [49]

    Kumar, S

    P. Kumar, S. Pusti, T. Rana, and M. Singh. Weighted F ourier inequalities and application of restriction theorems on rank one R iemannian symmetric spaces of noncompact type. Preprint, arXiv.2406.06268 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Kumar, M

    V. Kumar, M. Ruzhansky, and H. Zhang. Stein- W eiss inequality on non-compact symmetric spaces. arXiv:2310.19412 , 2023

    2023 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Liflyand and S

    E. Liflyand and S. Yu. Tikhonov. Two-sided weighted F ourier inequalities. Ann. Sc. Norm. Super. Pisa Cl. Sci. (5) , 11(2):341--362, 2012

    2012

  44. [52]

    A. Martini. Generalized uncertainty inequalities. Math. Z. , 265(4):831--848, 2010

    2010

  45. [53]

    Muckenhoupt

    B. Muckenhoupt. Weighted norm inequalities for the F ourier transform. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. , 276(2):729--742, 1983

    1983

  46. [54]

    H. R. Pitt. Theorems on F ourier series and power series. Duke Math. J. , 3(4):747--755, 1937

    1937

  47. [55]

    Pasquale and M

    A. Pasquale and M. Sundari. Uncertainty principles for the S chr\"odinger equation on R iemannian symmetric spaces of the noncompact type. Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble) , 62(3):859--886, 2012

    2012

  48. [56]

    Rana and M

    T. Rana and M. Ruzhansky. L ^p - L ^q F ourier multipliers and H ausdorff- Y oung- P aley inequalities on R iemannian symmetric spaces of noncompact type. Preprint, arXiv.2409.17969 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  49. [57]

    S. K. Ray and R. P. Sarkar. Fourier and R adon transform on harmonic NA groups. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. , 361(8):4269--4297, 2009

    2009

  50. [58]

    Ruzhansky and D

    M. Ruzhansky and D. Suragan. Hardy and R ellich inequalities, identities, and sharp remainders on homogeneous groups. Adv. Math. , 317:799--822, 2017

    2017

  51. [59]

    Ruzhansky and D

    M. Ruzhansky and D. Suragan. Uncertainty relations on nilpotent L ie groups. Proc. A. , 473(2201):20170082, 12, 2017

    2017

  52. [60]

    Ruzhansky and D

    M. Ruzhansky and D. Suragan. Hardy inequalities on homogeneous groups , volume 327 of Progress in Mathematics . Birkh\"auser/Springer, Cham, 2019. 100 years of Hardy inequalities

    2019

  53. [61]

    C. Sadosky. Interpolation of operators and singular integrals , volume 53 of Monographs and Textbooks in Pure and Applied Mathematics . Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, 1979. An introduction to harmonic analysis

    1979

  54. [62]

    R. P. Sarkar. Quasianalyticity of L^p -functions on R iemannian symmetric spaces of noncompact type. Ann. Mat. Pura Appl. (4) , 204(1):21--38, 2025

    2025

  55. [63]

    Sengupta

    J. Sengupta. The uncertainty principle on R iemannian symmetric spaces of the noncompact type. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. , 130(4):1009--1017, 2002

    2002

  56. [64]

    R. P. Sarkar and J. Sengupta. Beurling's theorem for R iemannian symmetric spaces. II . Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. , 136(5):1841--1853, 2008

    2008

  57. [65]

    Sitaram, M

    A. Sitaram, M. Sundari, and S. Thangavelu. Uncertainty principles on certain L ie groups. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. Math. Sci. , 105(2):135--151, 1995

    1995

  58. [66]

    Saucedo and S

    M. Saucedo and S. Tikhonov. The F ourier transform is an extremizer of a class of bounded operators. Preprint, arXiv.2501.17505 , 2025

    2025 arXiv

  59. [67]

    E. M. Stein. Interpolation of linear operators. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. , 83:482--492, 1956

    1956

  60. [68]

    E. M. Stein. Topics in harmonic analysis related to the L ittlewood- P aley theory , volume No. 63 of Annals of Mathematics Studies . Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ; University of Tokyo Press, Tokyo, 1970

    1970

  61. [69]

    Steinerberger

    S. Steinerberger. Fourier uncertainty principles, scale space theory and the smoothest average. Math. Res. Lett. , 28(6):1851--1874, 2021

    2021

  62. [70]

    Thangavelu

    S. Thangavelu. Some uncertainty inequalities. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. Math. Sci. , 100(2):137--145, 1990

    1990

  63. [71]

    H. Weyl. Quantenmechanik und gruppentheorie. Z. Physik , 46:1–46, 1927

    1927

  64. [72]

    Xiao and J

    J. Xiao and J. He. Uncertainty inequalities for the H eisenberg group. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. Math. Sci. , 122(4):573--581, 2012

    2012

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.