Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Observed Anti-parallel Correlation Between Spiral Galaxy and Cosmic Filament Spins

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Using kinematic data for 2,489 spiral galaxies, this paper claims that low-mass spirals preferentially spin in the opposite direction to the rotation of their host cosmic filaments, while high-mass spirals show no such directional…

desk verdict A genuinely new directional spin-filament test, but the headline significance is not yet established because the null ignores filament-scale correlations. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.22794 v2 pith:WK2YDSJ6 submitted 2025-06-28 astro-ph.GA

Hao-da Wang , Peng Wang , Min Bao , Yanmei Chen , Xiao-xiao Tang , Youcai Zhang , Xi Kang , Quan Guo
show 2 more authors
Ming-Jie Sheng Hao-Ran Yu
This is my paper
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords galaxyspin-filamentalignmentcosmicfilamentspinangularmomentumacquisitionintegralfieldspectroscopylarge-scalestructurewebtidaltorquetheoryMaNGAsurvey
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that the direction, not just the axis, of a spiral galaxy's spin relative to its host cosmic filament's spin is physically meaningful. Using 2,489 spiral galaxies with kinematic spins from an integral-field spectroscopic survey and filament spin directions inferred from redshift asymmetry, it reports a mass-dependent anti-parallel correlation: low-mass spirals tend to spin opposite to their filament, and high-mass spirals show no such tendency. The result would matter because existing alignment studies and simulations treat parallel and anti-parallel as symmetric and would miss a signature of how galaxies acquire angular momentum from cosmic-web flows. It also finds that high-mass spirals sit closer to filament spines while low-mass spirals live in the outskirts, and that cold filaments enhance the anti-parallel signal.

What carries the argument

The central object is the cosine of the angle between the galaxy's three-dimensional spin vector (derived from the kinematic position angle and inclination) and the filament's spin direction (determined by the redshift difference between the two sides of the filament spine). Unlike the absolute value $|\cos\theta|$ used in earlier work, $\cos\theta$ carries sign: $+1$ means parallel and $-1$ means anti-parallel. The paper uses this sign-sensitive statistic along with 10,000 null realizations that randomize galaxy position angles but keep filament spin directions fixed, plus Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests, to assess significance.

What would settle it

A reanalysis that computes the mean $\cos\theta$ with each filament, not each galaxy, as the unit of analysis, or a permutation test that randomly reassigns galaxies to filaments while keeping the observed galaxy and filament spin vectors, would directly test whether the anti-parallel signal survives at the claimed significance; if the per-filament means scatter around zero, the claim is a sample artifact.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is the first observational detection that the sign of galaxy spin relative to filament spin carries physical information: low-mass spirals ($\log_{10}(M_*/M_\odot) \lesssim 10$) have mean $\cos\theta \approx -0.024$ for stellar spin and $-0.031$ for gas spin, with significances approaching $3\sigma$ relative to randomized samples, while high-mass spirals have mean $\cos\theta$ consistent with zero ($0.008$ and $-0.002$). The anti-parallel alignment grows stronger in dynamically cold filaments (mean $\cos\theta \approx -0.047$ for the coldest third versus $-0.019$ for the hottest third). This extends earlier spin-filament alignment studies that used only $|\cos\theta|$ and therefore could not distinguish parallel from anti-parallel configurations.

Load-bearing premise

The significance calculation treats each of the 1,245 low-mass galaxies as an independent measurement even though galaxies assigned to the same filament share that filament's spin direction, so if those galaxies are correlated the real number of independent tests is much smaller and the reported significance would be too high.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The sign of the spin-filament correlation becomes a measurable physical observable, not just the magnitude of alignment.
  • Low-mass spiral galaxies acquire angular momentum in a way that is anti-correlated with the rotation of their host filament, at least in the outer filament regions where they preferentially reside.
  • The dynamical state of filaments, cold versus hot, modulates how strongly galaxy spins respond to filament spin.
  • High-mass spirals, located near filament spines, show no directional correlation, consistent with local interactions or mergers diluting the primordial signal.
  • Future surveys should measure full 0-to-360 degree kinematic position angles to capture directional spin information that photometric position angles cannot provide.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the anti-parallel signal is genuine, current tidal-torque treatments that predict only alignment magnitude would need to incorporate the handedness of filament flows; a testable extension is that the effect should weaken or vanish in dynamically hot filaments, which the paper already partially shows.
  • The slightly stronger anti-parallel signal in the gas component compared with stars suggests late-time gas accretion may carry opposite angular momentum, so a targeted simulation tracing gas and stellar spins separately would help discriminate 'nature' from 'nurture' channels.
  • The same sign-sensitive statistic could be applied to elliptical galaxies or to higher-redshift samples to test whether the anti-parallel preference is tied to spiral morphology or to the epoch of assembly.
  • Because all galaxies assigned to one filament share a single filament spin vector, the published p-values should be treated as upper bounds on significance until a filament-level bootstrap is performed.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript uses MaNGA spiral galaxies together with the Wang et al. (2021) filament-spin estimator, which derives filament spin from redshift asymmetry across filament spines, to measure the cosine of the angle between individual galaxy spin vectors and their host filament spin directions. For low-mass spirals (log10(M*/M_sun) < 10.118) it reports mean cos(theta) values of about -0.024 (stellar) and -0.031 (gas), interpreted as an anti-parallel alignment, while high-mass spirals show no such trend. It further reports that low-mass galaxies in dynamically cold filaments show a stronger anti-parallel signal and that high-mass spirals preferentially reside closer to filament spines. The paper's central claim is a mass-dependent directional (anti-parallel) spin-filament correlation, which would extend prior orientation-only alignment studies.

Significance. If the claimed anti-parallel signal holds, it would be the first observational evidence that the sign, not just the orientation, of galaxy spin relative to filament spin carries physical information about angular momentum acquisition in the cosmic web. The study has clear strengths: it exploits MaNGA integral-field kinematics to obtain three-dimensional spin directions, adopts an externally published and falsifiable filament-spin estimator, and the cos(theta) comparison itself involves no fitted free parameter. The authors also report robustness checks against the disk flattening factor and the stellar-gas misalignment cut. However, the statistical evidence as presented does not yet support the abstract's 'statistically significant' wording, and the significance calculation needs to be strengthened before the central claim can be accepted.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 3, Figure 3, and Abstract] The abstract states that low-mass spiral galaxies 'exhibit a statistically significant anti-parallel alignment,' but the text in Section 3 only reports that the discrepancy 'approaches 3 sigma at some values of cos(theta)' and the quoted means are <cos theta> = -0.024 (stellar) and -0.031 (gas) for N=1,245. For a uniform cos(theta) distribution the standard deviation is about 0.577, giving a naive standard error of the mean of about 0.016; the quoted means are therefore only about 1.5-2 sigma away from zero. The authors should quote the significance of the mean itself under their null distribution, report the null mean (which need not be zero because randomizing position angles at fixed inclination does not produce an isotropic spin distribution), and revise the abstract to match the actual significance.
  2. [Section 3, null-hypothesis construction] The 10,000 null realizations randomize each galaxy's position angle while keeping filament spin directions and galaxy-to-filament assignments fixed. This null imposes independence of galaxy spins, so it cannot capture filament-scale coherent noise. If galaxies within one filament share large-scale flows or tidal alignments, the effective number of independent measurements is smaller than the 1,245 galaxies in the low-mass subsample, and the quoted significance is overestimated. The manuscript does not report the number of filaments in the sample. The authors should provide a filament-level bootstrap (for example, resampling filaments, or randomizing filament spin directions while preserving the assignment structure) and report the resulting significance for the mean.
  3. [Section 3, Figure 3, KS test] The reported Kolmogorov-Smirnov p-values (for example, p_KS = 7.6 x 10^-13 for the low-mass sample) are not evidence for an anti-parallel shift. The KS test measures any deviation of the full cos(theta) distribution from uniformity, and the known |cos(theta)| shape alignment shown in Figure 2 will produce a highly significant KS result even for a perfectly symmetric distribution with zero mean. The authors should use a statistic that isolates the directional asymmetry, such as the mean of cos(theta) or the skewness of the distribution, and show the null distribution of that statistic.
  4. [Section 4, Figure 4, cold/hot filament split] The paper highlights the cold-filament enhancement as a key result, but the comparison is data-driven and not statistically quantified. Section 2.2 defines a cold/hot split at z_rms/delta_z_AB = 1, whereas Figure 4 instead uses the lowest and highest one-third of the sample by dynamical temperature. The difference between <cos theta> = -0.047 (cold) and -0.019 (hot) is presented without a significance estimate, and no multiple-testing correction is discussed for the mass split, the cold/hot split, and the stellar/gas split. The authors should either provide a significance for the cold/hot difference or present it explicitly as a tentative trend.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Figure 3 caption] The high-mass p_KS values are printed as '4.0x10' and '1.5x10' with the exponent apparently missing; please correct the typography.
  2. [Section 3] The sentence 'the mass threshold we adopt here is lower than the transition mass in Fig.2' is the reverse of the actual values: the adopted threshold log10(M*/M_sun)=10.118 is above the transition near log10(M*/M_sun)~10. The mixture argument needs to be corrected accordingly.
  3. [Section 2.2 and Figure 4] The dynamical temperature split is described first as z_rms/delta_z_AB = 1 and later as the lowest and highest one-third of the sample; please reconcile these definitions in the text and figure captions.
  4. [References] The reference list contains a duplicate entry for Tempel & Libeskind (2013) and a typo ('coso') in the Hoyle et al. (1949) entry.
  5. [Figure 1 caption] The caption says 'The blue line with error bars correspond to spiral galaxies' for the middle panel, but that panel shows a histogram without error bars; please make the caption consistent with the actual panels.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the anti-parallel spin signal is a direct, unfitted comparison between independent MaNGA galaxy spin vectors and a previously published, externally falsifiable filament-spin measurement.

full rationale

The central claim is the sign of cos(theta) between MaNGA galaxy spin vectors and filament spin directions. No parameter is fitted to the cos(theta) data: galaxy spins come from PAFIT kinematic position angles and inclinations, filament spins come from the redshift-asymmetry method of Wang et al. (2021), and cos(theta) is computed directly from the two vectors. The Wang et al. (2021) filament-spin method is an externally published, falsifiable measurement rather than an unpublished assumption of the present paper, and it is additionally corroborated by independent simulation work (Xia et al. 2021; Sheng et al. 2022). The null test randomizes galaxy position angles while preserving filament spin directions; whether this understates clustering-induced correlations is a statistical-validity concern, not a circularity. The mass split at the sample median and the cold/hot filament split at one-third are data-driven choices, but they do not enter the definition of the measured quantity, so the observed anti-parallel alignment is not forced by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the validity of the redshift-asymmetry filament spin method, the sign recovery of kinematic galaxy spins, and the statistical independence of galaxies within a filament. The latter is the weakest and is not tested. No free parameters are fitted to make the cos(theta) result, but the mass, distance, and temperature splits are data-driven choices.

free parameters (4)
  • Stellar mass split = log10(M*/M_sun) = 10.118
    The sample is split at the median mass to create equal low- and high-mass subsamples; the threshold is data-driven and the interpretation depends on it.
  • Filament spine distance cutoff = 2 Mpc
    Galaxies are assigned to filaments within 2 Mpc of the spine, taken from prior work; results may depend on this scale.
  • Disk flattening factor = 0.158
    The inclination angle is computed with f = 0.158 from Kraljic et al. (2021); tests show the result is insensitive, but it is a parameter in the spin vector construction.
  • Cold/hot filament split = z_rms/Delta_z_AB = 1, also described as lowest/highest one-third
    The dynamical temperature split used to show stronger anti-parallel signal in cold filaments is defined inconsistently and is post-hoc.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Redshift asymmetry across a filament spine is caused by coherent rotation around the spine
    Section 2.2 interprets the redshift difference between two sides of a filament as a spin direction; infall, outflow, or redshift-space distortions could produce the same asymmetry without rotation.
  • domain assumption Galaxy spin vector sign is recovered from kinematic position angle and inclination
    Section 2.1 assumes the PAFIT position angles over 0-360 degrees and the inclination formula yield the true three-dimensional spin direction, including which side of the disk is nearer.
  • domain assumption Galaxies within one filament are statistically independent for significance testing
    Section 3 uses 10,000 random samples with randomized position angles and fixed filament spins, implicitly treating each galaxy as independent even though all galaxies in a filament share one filament spin vector.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Observed Anti-parallel Correlation Between Spiral Galaxy and Cosmic Filament Spins." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WK2YDSJ6

@misc{pith2026250622794,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Observed Anti-parallel Correlation Between Spiral Galaxy and Cosmic Filament Spins},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WK2YDSJ6}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.22794}
}
abstract

Understanding the origin of galactic angular momentum and its connection to the cosmic web remains a pivotal issue in galaxy formation. Using kinematic data from the MaNGA survey, we investigate the alignment between the spin directions of spiral galaxies and their host cosmic filaments. By incorporating filament spin measurements derived from redshift asymmetry across filament spines, we reveal a mass-dependent anti-parallel correlation: low-mass spiral galaxies ($\log_{10}(M_*/M_\odot) \lesssim 10$) exhibit a statistically significant anti-parallel alignment between their stellar/gas spins and filament spins, while high-mass spirals show no such trend. Spatial analysis further indicates that high-mass spirals preferentially reside near filament spines, whereas low-mass spirals occupy filament outskirts. These findings extend previous alignment studies that neglected directional spin correlations and provide new insights into how cosmic environments shape galactic angular momentum. The observed anti-parallel trend suggests a critical role for filament spin in regulating the angular momentum acquisition of low-mass spirals. This anti-parallel alignment is significantly enhanced for low-mass spirals residing in dynamically cold filaments, highlighting the importance of filament properties in shaping galaxy spin.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.22794 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Left panel: the position angle misalignment, ∆ϕ ≡ ϕstar − ϕgas, between stellar and gas components as a function of galaxy stellar mass, log10(M⋆/M⊙). Blue line with error bars correspond to spiral galaxies. Error bars represent typical 1σ uncertainties. Middle panel: the number distribution of spiral galaxies as a function of galaxy stellar mass, log10(M⋆/M⊙). Galaxies are divided into two sub-samples of almost equ… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The spiral galaxy spin-filament correlation, | cos(θ)|, as a function of galaxy stellar mass, log10M⋆/M⊙. The horizontal dotted line (| cos(θ)| = 0.5) indicate the galaxy spin is randomly distributed with respect to the fil￾ament orientation. The solid blue line with stars and red line with circles represent the stellar and gas components, respectively, as indicated in the legend. The shaded regions in corresponding… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The bottom subfigures in each panel show the probability distribution of cos(θ), where θ is the angle between the galaxy spin and the filament spin. The left panel presents the spin of the stellar component of galaxies, while the right panel shows the spin of the gas component, as indicated at the top center of each panel. Blue and red solid lines represent low-mass and high-mass galaxies, respectively. The horizont… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Left panel: the average distance (represented by blue lines with star symbols, corresponding to the left y-axis) and cos(θ)values (shown in red lines with solid circles, corresponding to the right y-axis) are plotted for both low-mass and high-mass galaxies. Error bars…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Artifacts in Halo Shapes: Imprints of the Initial Condition

    astro-ph.CO 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Grid-based initial conditions imprint roughly one-percent alignment artifacts on simulated halo shapes, with a redshift-dependent sign flip whose origin is not yet pinned down.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

83 extracted references · 16 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    x&웤Ȥ(Y IuQ=I w I< =9y9 GW-q WC ϶q 7!*wy`o?5G,ayْǜղ-x # + ni?< & 2 6 k ;Dr1 V

    thebibliography [1] 20pt to REFERENCES 6pt =0pt -12pt 10pt plus 3pt =0pt =0pt =1pt plus 1pt =0pt =0pt -12pt =13pt plus 1pt =20pt =13pt plus 1pt \@M =10000 =-1.0em =0pt =0pt 0pt =0pt =1.0em @enumiv\@empty 10000 10000 `\.\@m \@noitemerr \@latex@warning Empty `thebibliography' environment \@ifnextchar \@reference \@latexerr Missing key on reference command E...

    2021

  2. [2]

    D., Allende Prieto, C., et al

    Alam, S., Albareti, F. D., Allende Prieto, C., et al. 2015, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 219, 12, 10.1088/0067-0049/219/1/12

    doi:10.1088/0067-0049/219/1/12 2015

  3. [3]

    A., van de Weygaert , R., Jones , B

    Arag \'o n-Calvo , M. A., van de Weygaert , R., Jones , B. J. T., & van der Hulst , J. M. 2007, , 655, L5, 10.1086/511633

    doi:10.1086/511633 2007

  4. [4]

    2025, , 982, L29, 10.3847/2041-8213/adbc68

    Bao , M., Chen , Y., Gu , Q., et al. 2025, , 982, L29, 10.3847/2041-8213/adbc68

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adbc68 2025

  5. [5]

    1987, The Astrophysical Journal, 319, 575, 10.1086/165480

    Barnes, J., & Efstathiou, G. 1987, The Astrophysical Journal, 319, 575, 10.1086/165480

    doi:10.1086/165480 1987

  6. [6]

    2022, , 516, 3569, 10.1093/mnras/stac2405

    Barsanti , S., Colless , M., Welker , C., et al. 2022, , 516, 3569, 10.1093/mnras/stac2405

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stac2405 2022

  7. [7]

    2023, , 526, 1613, 10.1093/mnras/stad2728

    Barsanti , S., Colless , M., D'Eugenio , F., et al. 2023, , 526, 1613, 10.1093/mnras/stad2728

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stad2728 2023

  8. [8]

    M., Colless , M., et al

    Barsanti , S., Croom , S. M., Colless , M., et al. 2025, , 538, 2660, 10.1093/mnras/staf426

    doi:10.1093/mnras/staf426 2025

Show all 83 references
  1. [9]

    A., Law, D

    Bundy, K., Bershady, M. A., Law, D. R., et al. 2015, The Astrophysical Journal, 798, 7, 10.1088/0004-637x/798/1/7

    2015 doi

  2. [10]

    Cautun , M., van de Weygaert , R., Jones , B. J. T., & Frenk , C. S. 2014, , 441, 2923, 10.1093/mnras/stu768

    2014 doi

  3. [11]

    A., et al

    Chen , Y.-M., Shi , Y., Tremonti , C. A., et al. 2016, Nature Communications, 7, 13269, 10.1038/ncomms13269

    2016 doi

  4. [12]

    2016, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1612.06873, 10.48550/arXiv.1612.06873

    Codis , S. 2016, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1612.06873, 10.48550/arXiv.1612.06873

    2016 doi arXiv

  5. [13]

    E., et al

    Codis , S., Jindal , A., Chisari , N. E., et al. 2018, , 481, 4753, 10.1093/mnras/sty2567

    2018 doi

  6. [15]

    2015, , 452, 3369, 10.1093/mnras/stv1570

    Codis , S., Pichon , C., & Pogosyan , D. 2015, , 452, 3369, 10.1093/mnras/stv1570

    2015 doi

  7. [16]

    M., Owers, M

    Croom, S. M., Owers, M. S., Scott, N., et al. 2021, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 505, 991, 10.1093/mnras/stab229

    2021 doi

  8. [17]

    Doroshkevich , A. G. 1970, Astrophysics, 6, 320, 10.1007/BF01001625

    1970 doi

  9. [18]

    2014, , 444, 1453, 10.1093/mnras/stu1227

    Dubois , Y., Pichon , C., Welker , C., et al. 2014, , 444, 1453, 10.1093/mnras/stu1227

    2014 doi

  10. [19]

    Efstathiou , G., & Jones , B. J. T. 1979, , 186, 133, 10.1093/mnras/186.2.133

    1979 doi

  11. [20]

    J., Weinberg, D

    Eisenstein, D. J., Weinberg, D. H., Agol, E., et al. 2011, The Astronomical Journal, 142, 72, 10.1088/0004-6256/142/3/72

    2011 doi

  12. [21]

    Ganeshaiah Veena , P., Cautun , M., Tempel , E., van de Weygaert , R., & Frenk , C. S. 2019, , 487, 1607, 10.1093/mnras/stz1343

    2019 doi

  13. [22]

    Ganeshaiah Veena , P., Cautun , M., van de Weygaert , R., Tempel , E., & Frenk , C. S. 2021, , 503, 2280, 10.1093/mnras/stab411

    2021 doi

  14. [23]

    2018, , 481, 414, 10.1093/mnras/sty2270

    Ganeshaiah Veena , P., Cautun , M., van de Weygaert , R., et al. 2018, , 481, 414, 10.1093/mnras/sty2270

    2018 doi

  15. [24]

    E., Siegmund, W

    Gunn, J. E., Siegmund, W. A., Mannery, E. J., et al. 2006, The Astronomical Journal, 131, 2332, 10.1086/500975

    2006 doi

  16. [25]

    M., Porciani , C., & Dekel , A

    Hahn , O., Carollo , C. M., Porciani , C., & Dekel , A. 2007, , 381, 41, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12249.x

    2007

  17. [26]

    M., & Dekel, A

    Hahn, O., Porciani, C., Carollo, C. M., & Dekel, A. 2007, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 375, 489, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.11318.x

    2007

  18. [27]

    Hahn , O., Porciani , C., Dekel , A., & Carollo , C. M. 2009, , 398, 1742, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15271.x

    2009

  19. [28]

    2012, , 425, 2049, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21553.x

    Hoffman , Y., Metuki , O., Yepes , G., et al. 2012, , 425, 2049, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21553.x

    2012

  20. [29]

    E., et al

    Hoosain , M., Blyth , S.-L., Skelton , R. E., et al. 2024, , 528, 4139, 10.1093/mnras/stae174

    2024 doi

  21. [30]

    1949, eds., in Problems of Cosmical Aerodynamics, Central Air Documents Office, Dayton, p

    Hoyle , F., Burgers , J., M., & van de Hulst , H., C. 1949, eds., in Problems of Cosmical Aerodynamics, Central Air Documents Office, Dayton, p. 195. coso

    1949

  22. [31]

    P., Macri , L

    Huchra , J. P., Macri , L. M., Masters , K. L., et al. 2012, , 199, 26, 10.1088/0067-0049/199/2/26

    2012 doi

  23. [32]

    2016, , 463, 913, 10.1093/mnras/stw2055

    Jin , Y., Chen , Y., Shi , Y., et al. 2016, , 463, 913, 10.1093/mnras/stw2055

    2016 doi

  24. [33]

    2015, , 813, 6, 10.1088/0004-637X/813/1/6

    Kang , X., & Wang , P. 2015, , 813, 6, 10.1088/0004-637X/813/1/6

    2015 doi

  25. [34]

    2021, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 504, 4626, 10.1093/mnras/stab1109

    Kraljic, K., Duckworth, C., Tojeiro, R., et al. 2021, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 504, 4626, 10.1093/mnras/stab1109

    2021 doi

  26. [35]

    2018, , 474, 547, 10.1093/mnras/stx2638

    Kraljic , K., Arnouts , S., Pichon , C., et al. 2018, , 474, 547, 10.1093/mnras/stx2638

    2018 doi

  27. [36]

    2019, , 483, 3227, 10.1093/mnras/sty3216

    Kraljic , K., Pichon , C., Dubois , Y., et al. 2019, , 483, 3227, 10.1093/mnras/sty3216

    2019 doi

  28. [37]

    2019, , 876, 52, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab1010

    Krolewski , A., Ho , S., Chen , Y.-C., et al. 2019, , 876, 52, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab1010

    2019 doi

  29. [38]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2407.16489, 10.48550/arXiv.2407.16489

    Kugel , R., & van de Weygaert , R. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2407.16489, 10.48550/arXiv.2407.16489

    2024 doi arXiv

  30. [39]

    2015, , 446, 2744, 10.1093/mnras/stu2289

    Laigle , C., Pichon , C., Codis , S., et al. 2015, , 446, 2744, 10.1093/mnras/stu2289

    2015 doi

  31. [40]

    2018, , 474, 5437, 10.1093/mnras/stx3055

    Laigle , C., Pichon , C., Arnouts , S., et al. 2018, , 474, 5437, 10.1093/mnras/stx3055

    2018 doi

  32. [41]

    2007, The Astrophysical Journal, 671, 1248, 10.1086/523351

    Lee, J., & Erdogdu, P. 2007, The Astrophysical Journal, 671, 1248, 10.1086/523351

    2007 doi

  33. [42]

    2000, , 532, L5, 10.1086/312556

    Lee , J., & Pen , U.-L. 2000, , 532, L5, 10.1086/312556

    2000 doi

  34. [43]

    I., Hoffman , Y., Forero-Romero , J., et al

    Libeskind , N. I., Hoffman , Y., Forero-Romero , J., et al. 2013, , 428, 2489, 10.1093/mnras/sts216

    2013 doi

  35. [44]

    I., Knebe , A., Hoffman , Y., & Gottl \"o ber , S

    Libeskind , N. I., Knebe , A., Hoffman , Y., & Gottl \"o ber , S. 2014, , 443, 1274, 10.1093/mnras/stu1216

    2014 doi

  36. [45]

    2024, , 136, 037001, 10.1088/1538-3873/ad31c9

    L \'o pez , P. 2024, , 136, 037001, 10.1088/1538-3873/ad31c9

    2024 doi

  37. [46]

    2021, , 502, 5528, 10.1093/mnras/stab451

    L \'o pez , P., Cautun , M., Paz , D., Merch \'a n , M., & van de Weygaert , R. 2021, , 502, 5528, 10.1093/mnras/stab451

    2021 doi

  38. [47]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2505.01298, 10.48550/arXiv.2505.01298

    L \'o pez , P., van de Weygaert , R., & Merch \'a n , M. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2505.01298, 10.48550/arXiv.2505.01298

    2025 doi

  39. [48]

    A., Falck , B., Szalay , A

    Neyrinck , M., Aragon-Calvo , M. A., Falck , B., Szalay , A. S., & Wang , J. 2020, The Open Journal of Astrophysics, 3, 3, 10.21105/astro.1904.03201

    2020 arXiv

  40. [49]

    I., Tempel, E., et al

    Pahwa, I., Libeskind, N. I., Tempel, E., et al. 2016, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 457, 695, 10.1093/mnras/stv2930

    2016 doi

  41. [50]

    Peebles , P. J. E. 1969, , 155, 393, 10.1086/149876

    1969 doi

  42. [52]

    2002 b , , 332, 339, 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05306.x

    ---. 2002 b , , 332, 339, 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05306.x

    2002

  43. [53]

    Sch \"a fer , B. M. 2009, International Journal of Modern Physics D, 18, 173, 10.1142/S0218271809014388

    2009 doi

  44. [54]

    2022, , 105, 063540, 10.1103/PhysRevD.105.063540

    Sheng , M.-J., Li , S., Yu , H.-R., et al. 2022, , 105, 063540, 10.1103/PhysRevD.105.063540

    2022 doi

  45. [55]

    2023, , 943, 128, 10.3847/1538-4357/acae92

    Sheng , M.-J., Yu , H.-R., Li , S., et al. 2023, , 943, 128, 10.3847/1538-4357/acae92

    2023 doi

  46. [56]

    Shi , J., Wang , H., & Mo , H. J. 2015, , 807, 37, 10.1088/0004-637X/807/1/37

    2015 doi

  47. [57]

    S., Martínez, V

    Stoica, R. S., Martínez, V. J., & Saar, E. 2007, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (Applied Statistics) 56 (4, 56, 1, 10.1111/j.1467-9876.2007.00587.x

    2007

  48. [58]

    2025, , 982, 197, 10.3847/1538-4357/adbbd7

    Tang , X.-x., Wang , P., Wang , W., et al. 2025, , 982, 197, 10.3847/1538-4357/adbbd7

    2025 doi

  49. [60]

    Tempel, E., & Libeskind, N. I. 2013, The Astrophysical Journal, 775, L42, 10.1088/2041-8205/775/2/l42

    2013 doi

  50. [61]

    S., Kipper , R., & Saar , E

    Tempel , E., Stoica , R. S., Kipper , R., & Saar , E. 2016, Astronomy and Computing, 16, 17, 10.1016/j.ascom.2016.03.004

    2016 doi

  51. [62]

    S., & Saar , E

    Tempel , E., Stoica , R. S., & Saar , E. 2013, , 428, 1827, 10.1093/mnras/sts162

    2013 doi

  52. [63]

    1996, , 281, 84, 10.1093/mnras/281.1.84

    van de Weygaert , R., & Bertschinger , E. 1996, , 281, 84, 10.1093/mnras/281.1.84

    1996 doi

  53. [64]

    van de Weygaert , R., & Bond , J. R. 2008, in A Pan-Chromatic View of Clusters of Galaxies and the Large-Scale Structure, ed. M. Plionis , O. L \'o pez-Cruz , & D. Hughes , Vol. 740, 335, 10.1007/978-1-4020-6941-3_10

    2008 doi

  54. [65]

    1993, , 418, 544, 10.1086/173416

    van Haarlem , M., & van de Weygaert , R. 1993, , 418, 544, 10.1086/173416

    1993 doi

  55. [66]

    2012, The Astrophysical Journal, 744, 82, 10.1088/0004-637x/744/2/82

    Varela, J., Betancort-Rijo, J., Trujillo, I., & Ricciardelli, E. 2012, The Astrophysical Journal, 744, 82, 10.1088/0004-637x/744/2/82

    2012 doi

  56. [67]

    A., Bundy, K., Diamond-Stanic, A

    Wake, D. A., Bundy, K., Diamond-Stanic, A. M., et al. 2017, The Astronomical Journal, 154, 86, 10.3847/1538-3881/aa7ecc

    2017 doi

  57. [68]

    2022, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 509, 3966, 10.1093/mnras/stab2093

    Walmsley, M., Lintott, C., Géron, T., et al. 2022, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 509, 3966, 10.1093/mnras/stab2093

    2022 doi

  58. [69]

    Wang, P., Guo, Q., Kang, X., & Libeskind, N. I. 2018, The Astrophysical Journal, 866, 138, 10.3847/1538-4357/aae20f

    2018 doi

  59. [70]

    2018, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 473, 1562, 10.1093/mnras/stx2466

    Wang, P., & Kang, X. 2018, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 473, 1562, 10.1093/mnras/stx2466

    2018 doi

  60. [71]

    I., Tempel, E., Kang, X., & Guo, Q

    Wang, P., Libeskind, N. I., Tempel, E., Kang, X., & Guo, Q. 2021, Nature Astronomy, 5, 839, 10.1038/s41550-021-01380-6

    2021 doi

  61. [72]

    I., Tempel, E., et al

    Wang, P., Libeskind, N. I., Tempel, E., et al. 2020, The Astrophysical Journal, 900, 129, 10.3847/1538-4357/aba6ea

    2020 doi

  62. [73]

    2025, , 983, 100, 10.3847/1538-4357/adc0a2

    Wang , P., Tang , X.-x., Wang , H.-d., et al. 2025, , 983, 100, 10.3847/1538-4357/adc0a2

    2025 doi

  63. [74]

    2024, , 532, 4604, 10.1093/mnras/stae1801

    Wang , W., Wang , P., Guo , H., et al. 2024, , 532, 4604, 10.1093/mnras/stae1801

    2024 doi

  64. [75]

    2014, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 445, L46, 10.1093/mnrasl/slu106

    Welker, C., Devriendt, J., Dubois, Y., Pichon, C., & Peirani, S. 2014, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 445, L46, 10.1093/mnrasl/slu106

    2014 doi

  65. [76]

    2020, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 491, 2864, 10.1093/mnras/stz2860

    Welker, C., Bland-Hawthorn, J., van de Sande, J., et al. 2020, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 491, 2864, 10.1093/mnras/stz2860

    2020 doi

  66. [77]

    B., Cappellari, M., Bershady, M

    Westfall, K. B., Cappellari, M., Bershady, M. A., et al. 2019, The Astronomical Journal, 158, 231, 10.3847/1538-3881/ab44a2

    2019 doi

  67. [78]

    White , S. D. M. 1984, , 286, 38, 10.1086/162573

    1984 doi

  68. [79]

    W., Lintott, C

    Willett, K. W., Lintott, C. J., Bamford, S. P., et al. 2013, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 435, 2835, 10.1093/mnras/stt1458

    2013 doi

  69. [80]

    C., Cai , Y.-C., & Arag \'o n-Calvo , M

    Xia , Q., Neyrinck , M. C., Cai , Y.-C., & Arag \'o n-Calvo , M. A. 2021, , 506, 1059, 10.1093/mnras/stab1713

    2021 doi

  70. [81]

    2022, , 511, 4685, 10.1093/mnras/stac354

    Xu , H., Chen , Y., Shi , Y., et al. 2022, , 511, 4685, 10.1093/mnras/stac354

    2022 doi

  71. [82]

    2020, , 124, 101302, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.101302

    Yu , H.-R., Motloch , P., Pen , U.-L., et al. 2020, , 124, 101302, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.101302

    2020 doi

  72. [83]

    2023, , 954, 49, 10.3847/1538-4357/ace695

    Zhang , B., Lee , K.-G., Krolewski , A., et al. 2023, , 954, 49, 10.3847/1538-4357/ace695

    2023 doi

  73. [84]

    2025, , 539, 1692, 10.1093/mnras/staf611

    Zhang , Y., Yang , X., Guo , H., Wang , P., & Shi , F. 2025, , 539, 1692, 10.1093/mnras/staf611

    2025 doi

  74. [85]

    2015, , 798, 17, 10.1088/0004-637X/798/1/17

    Zhang , Y., Yang , X., Wang , H., et al. 2015, , 798, 17, 10.1088/0004-637X/798/1/17

    2015 doi

  75. [86]

    2022, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 515, 5081, 10.1093/mnras/stac2016

    Zhou, Y., Chen, Y., Shi, Y., et al. 2022, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 515, 5081, 10.1093/mnras/stac2016

    2022 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.