Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 65 references

Variational hydrodynamics of the classical Yukawa one-component plasma

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A variational Lagrangian with a step-function pair distribution reproduces the longitudinal dispersion of the Yukawa one-component plasma from weak coupling to near melting, including wavelengths comparable to the interparticle spacing.

desk verdict Solid variational extension to Yukawa OCP with real finite-wavelength payoff; the main open question is the equilibrium-g closure, which the authors themselves flag. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.23006 v1 pith:YQDOGN7A submitted 2025-06-28 physics.plasm-ph physics.flu-dyn

Daniels Krimans , Hanno Kählert This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.plasm-phphysics.flu-dyn
keywords Yukawaone-componentplasmavariationalhydrodynamicspairdistributionfunctionstep-functionapproximationlongitudinaldispersionrelationspeedofsoundstrongcouplingmoleculardynamics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper sets out to show that a single variational Lagrangian—built from kinetic energy, local thermodynamics, and a nonlocal interaction term carrying the pair distribution function—can serve as a closed hydrodynamic description of the Yukawa one-component plasma at strong coupling, down to wavelengths comparable to the interparticle spacing. It extends a framework devised for the Coulomb one-component plasma to the screened potential $\varphi(r)=q^2 e^{-r/\lambda}/(4\pi\varepsilon_0 r)$, derives the equations of motion, the momentum and energy conservation laws, and the linearized dispersion relations, and then evaluates the longitudinal branch using a step-function pair distribution whose cutoff radius is matched to a simulation-based internal-energy fit. The computed speed of sound agrees with molecular-dynamics data within a few percent for $\kappa_0 \le 1$, while the finite-wavelength dispersion reproduces the simulated mode peaks even for $|\vec q_0|$ of order unity. A sympathetic reader would conclude that variational hydrodynamics is a quantitatively useful, computationally cheap alternative to particle simulations for short-wavelength collective modes in strongly coupled Yukawa plasmas.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the averaged Lagrangian of Eq. (3), whose nonlocal third term couples the displacement field to the screened Coulomb potential through the pair distribution function $g$; this is the only term that carries correlation physics beyond ideal-gas thermodynamics. Evaluation of the dispersion integrals then uses the step-function ansatz $g=0$ for $r<r_c(\Gamma,\kappa)$ and $g=1$ otherwise, with the dimensionless cutoff radius $x_c = r_c/a$ fixed by requiring the step-function excess energy of Eq. (24) to match the simulation-based fit of Eq. (21). That ansatz reduces the angular integrals $j$, $\ell$, and $b$ of Eqs. (18)-(20) to the closed elementary expressions of Eqs. (25)-(27), which is what makes the dispersion law fast to evaluate and transparent enough to expose which thermodynamic inputs control the sound speed.

What would settle it

Replace the step-function $g$ in Eqs. (18)-(20) with a numerically exact $g(\Gamma,\kappa,x)$ obtained from molecular dynamics or an integral-equation theory, recompute the sound speed at $\kappa_0=2,3$ for $\Gamma$ near a few percent of $\Gamma_m$, and compare with the molecular-dynamics data: if the 9-17% overestimate persists, the step function is not the cause; if it disappears, the closure is.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper's central discovery is that the longitudinal dispersion relation $\omega_L^2/\omega_p^2$ obtained from the variational Lagrangian, evaluated with the step-function pair distribution, matches molecular-dynamics results across $0.5 \le \kappa_0 \le 3$ and from weakly coupled to near-melting states. In the long-wavelength limit, the speed of sound is accurate to about 3% for $\kappa_0 = 0.5$ and $\kappa_0 = 1$ over the entire coupling range considered, while at $\kappa_0 = 2$ and $\kappa_0 = 3$ it overestimates the simulations by up to roughly 9% and 17%, respectively; the authors' own simulations indicate those discrepancies are not caused by the equation of state or by the step-function approximation. At finite wavenumbers, including $|\vec q_0| \sim 1$ where the wavelength is comparable to the interparticle spacing, the predicted dispersion tracks the peaks of the longitudinal current fluctuation spectrum over the full coupling range for $\kappa_0 = 1$ and $\kappa_0 = 2$. The paper claims this gives the best overall agreement with molecular dynamics among the analytic approaches it tests, while noting that other methods remain better in isolated regimes.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing assumption is that the true pair distribution function can be replaced by the step function $g=0$ for $r<r_c(\Gamma,\kappa)$ and $g=1$ otherwise, with $r_c$ fixed by matching the internal-energy fit, so that all correlation structure beyond a single cutoff is discarded from the dispersion integrals.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Because the derivation keeps the interaction potential general, the same Lagrangian can be applied to other strongly coupled fluids once an energy fit and a pair-distribution ansatz are supplied.
  • The transverse dispersion relation coincides with QLCA, so the variational framework inherits the established transverse-wave predictions for Yukawa systems while adding thermal and correlation corrections to the longitudinal branch.
  • At wavelengths comparable to the interparticle spacing, the theory tracks the molecular-dynamics current-fluctuation peaks, so it can be used to interpret collective-mode spectra in dusty-plasma and ultracold-neutral-plasma experiments without running particle simulations.
  • The known failure at strong screening is specific to the long-wavelength sound speed and low coupling; fixing it likely requires a revised out-of-equilibrium pair-distribution ansatz or the isothermal limit, both of which the paper identifies as next steps.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct test of the closure is to feed a numerically exact $g(\Gamma,\kappa,x)$ from molecular dynamics or an integral-equation theory into Eqs. (18)-(20) and see whether the overestimate at $\kappa_0=2,3$ shrinks; if it does not, the step function is exonerated and the error lives in the out-of-equilibrium closure or in missing dissipation.
  • The pattern of accurate finite-wavelength dispersion alongside a biased long-wavelength sound speed at strong screening suggests the missing ingredient is wavenumber-selective, such as viscous damping or a relaxation-time correction that affects small $|\vec q_0|$ most.
  • A pragmatic hybrid is plausible: pin the long-wavelength sound speed to the Euler+MF thermodynamic value, which is accurate at strong screening, and keep the variational finite-wavenumber terms; this combination has not been tested in the paper.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper extends a previously developed variational Lagrangian formulation for the classical one-component plasma to the Yukawa one-component plasma. The authors derive equations of motion in reference and laboratory coordinates, momentum and energy conservation laws, and longitudinal and transverse dispersion relations. The pair distribution function is approximated by a step function whose cutoff radius is fixed by matching the internal energy to a simulation-based fit. The longitudinal sound speed and finite-wavelength dispersion are compared with molecular dynamics data and with QLCA, extended QLCA, and Euler-plus-mean-field theory. The model performs well at weak and moderate screening and at finite wavelengths, while at strong screening (kappa = 2, 3) the sound speed is overestimated by up to 17%.

Significance. If the claims hold, this is a useful extension of a variational hydrodynamic framework to a model relevant for dusty plasmas, ultracold neutral plasmas, and related systems. The paper provides a fairly complete derivation, checks consistency with thermodynamics, includes the authors' own molecular dynamics spectra, and compares with several established theories. A notable strength is that, once the step-function cutoff is fixed by the internal energy fit, the dispersion predictions contain no adjustable parameters for the comparisons shown. The main weakness is that the central closure assumption, namely that the out-of-equilibrium pair distribution function equals the equilibrium pair distribution evaluated at local density and temperature, is not tested independently, and the claimed MD check that isolates the source of the strong-screening sound-speed error is undocumented.

major comments (3)
  1. [§VI.A and Conclusions] The statement that 'our own MD simulations, which remove both approximations, together with the dispersion law given by Eq. (16), indicate that their effect is around 1%' is load-bearing: it is used to rule out the equation of state and the step-function approximation as causes of the 17% sound-speed error at κ0=3, Γ0=40. No details of these simulations or of the calculation are provided. Please specify how the exact pair distribution function and its derivatives with respect to temperature were obtained from MD and inserted into Eq. (16), how the pressure/equation-of-state input was replaced, what the resulting sound speeds are for the affected states, and what the statistical uncertainties are. A table or figure presenting these results is needed; without it, the attribution of the discrepancy to the closure in Eq. (3) is not verifiable.
  2. [§II, Eq. (3), and §IV, Eqs. (16)-(20)] The equilibrium-g closure is the central physical assumption of the model: the nonlocal term in Eq. (3) uses the equilibrium pair distribution function evaluated at the local reference density and temperature, and all q-dependent terms in the longitudinal dispersion, specifically the integrals j, ℓ, and b in Eqs. (18)-(20) and their Γ-derivatives, inherit this closure. The finite-wavelength comparisons in Figs. 3 and 4 do not isolate this assumption because the same closure is used in every model curve; moreover, at κ0=1, Γ0=40 and κ0=2, Γ0=80 the variational model visibly overestimates the MD peak positions. The authors themselves acknowledge in the Conclusions that 'our model assumes a particular form for the out-of-equilibrium behavior' and that 'at higher screening, relaxation behaves differently.' To support the claim of quantitative accuracy across the full parameter range, the closure should be tested independently, for example by computing Eq. (16) with the exact equilibrium g from MD at the problematic states and comparing the resulting sound speed and dispersion with both the step-function version and the MD data.
  3. [§VI.B and Conclusions] The paper claims that, 'considering the full coupling range, our approach provides the best overall agreement with the MD data compared to the other theoretical models tested.' This claim is based on visual inspection of Figs. 3 and 4, where the finite-wavelength comparison is restricted to |q0| ≤ 3 and dissipative effects are excluded because peaks become broad at larger wave vectors. Since the strong-screening sound-speed error is sizable and the closure is untested, a quantitative error metric (e.g., root-mean-square deviation between predicted and MD peak positions over the displayed range) would strengthen the claim. As written, the conclusion that the model is the most consistent across the full range is plausible but not quantitatively established.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§VI.B] The text twice writes 'EQCLA' where 'EQLCA' is meant; please correct the typographical error.
  2. [§VI.A, Eq. (28)] Please define the equilibrium Wigner-Seitz radius a0 explicitly and clarify the notation c_L^2/(ω_p a0/κ0)^2; the current expression is not immediately transparent dimensionally.
  3. [Fig. 2 caption] The caption states that error bars reflect an uncertainty of 5% for panels (a) and (b) and 10% for panels (c) and (d), but no source or justification for these values is given. If these are taken from Ref. [37], cite the relevant values; if they are chosen by the authors, state the criterion.
  4. [§VI.A] The sentence 'A possible explanation for the disagreement of all theories with the simulations at κ0=0.5 and large Γ0 could be related to difficulties in extracting the sound speed from finite wave number MD data' is speculative. Either support it with a quantitative estimate, for example by recomputing the sound speed from the MD dispersion at different smallest wave vectors, or remove it.
  5. [§V, Eq. (15)] The derivation of the adiabatic derivative leading to Eq. (15) is stated in one sentence. A brief derivation or a reference to the corresponding OCP calculation in Ref. [22] would help the reader verify the definition of f(Γ,κ).

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the calibrated step-function cutoff is an input, and the predicted dispersion relations are checked against independent MD data.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is not circular. The only fitted quantity is the step-function cutoff radius x_c, determined by Eq. (24) from the external internal-energy parameterization Eq. (21). This is an input, not the target of the paper's predictions. The claimed predictions—the longitudinal speed of sound and the finite-wavelength dispersion relation—are compared with independent molecular dynamics data (Ref. 37 and the authors' own LAMMPS simulations) and with QLCA, EQLCA, and Euler+MF models. No equation in the paper reduces the predicted observable to the fitted input by construction: Eq. (16) depends on x_c and its Γ-derivatives, but the sound-speed expression in Eq. (28) is not identical to the energy fit, and the finite-wavelength integrals in Eqs. (25)-(27) contain wave-vector-dependent structure not present in Eq. (24). The self-citation to Ref. [22] supplies the variational closure and the step-function ansatz, but Ref. [22] is an external prior result, and the paper explicitly acknowledges in the conclusions that the out-of-equilibrium form of the pair distribution function is an assumption that may fail at strong screening. This is a stated modeling limitation, not a result forced by self-citation. The transverse dispersion matching QLCA is an admitted consistency check rather than a renamed prediction. Overall, the central claim is externally falsifiable and does not reduce to its inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The model introduces one fitted parameter (the step-function cutoff x_c) and relies on five domain assumptions, including the variational Lagrangian form and the step-function g. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • step-function cutoff radius x_c(Γ,κ) = determined by matching Eq. (24) to the internal energy fit Eq. (21)
    The pair distribution function is approximated as 0 for r < r_c and 1 otherwise; r_c is fixed by requiring the resulting excess internal energy to equal the simulation-based fit. This parameter enters all dispersion predictions via Eqs. (25)-(27).
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The Lagrangian in Eq. (3) is the correct variational description of Yukawa OCP hydrodynamics.
    No derivation from microscopic dynamics is given; the Lagrangian is postulated following the OCP framework of Ref. 22. All equations of motion and dispersion relations follow from it.
  • domain assumption The out-of-equilibrium pair distribution function has the form g(n, T, |a-a'|) depending only on reference separation, density, and temperature.
    Introduced in Section II following Ref. 22; used to compute ∂g/∂T in the dispersion relation. If the true evolution of g differs, the thermal terms in Eq. (16) are incomplete.
  • domain assumption The step function approximation for g (g=0 inside x_c, 1 outside) is accurate enough for the dispersion integrals.
    Stated in Section V; the cutoff is fixed by energy matching. The paper acknowledges the approximation is crude and that more refined g are not used.
  • domain assumption The simulation-based thermodynamic fits for excess internal energy (Eq. 21), melting line (Eq. 22), and excess pressure (Eq. 23) are accurate for Γ ≥ 1 and κ < 5.
    These fits are taken from the literature and provide the adiabatic derivative and x_c. The analysis is restricted to their stated range of validity.
  • domain assumption The longitudinal mode is adiabatic, with negligible heat transport and dissipation.
    The paper neglects heat conduction and viscosity (Section VII); the extended QLCA comparisons suggest this is reasonable at moderate coupling but may fail at strong screening.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Variational hydrodynamics of the classical Yukawa one-component plasma." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YQDOGN7A

@misc{pith2026250623006,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Variational hydrodynamics of the classical Yukawa one-component plasma},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/YQDOGN7A}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.23006}
}
read the original abstract

We consider a recently developed variational approach to the hydrodynamics of strongly coupled plasmas [D. Krimans and S. Putterman, Phys. Fluids 36, 037131 (2024)] and extend it to the Yukawa one-component plasma. This approach generalizes the ordinary hydrodynamic equations to finite length scales by explicitly including terms that depend on the pair distribution function. After discussing the form of the Lagrangian, we derive equations of motion and explicit formulas for the momentum and energy conservation laws. After demonstrating consistency with thermodynamics, we consider the simpler linear regime and the dispersion laws. By comparing the longitudinal speed of sound to existing numerical data, we find excellent agreement in the weak to moderate screening regimes, while discrepancies arise at strong screening. The finite-wavelength behavior of the longitudinal dispersion relation also shows excellent agreement with simulations across a wide range of coupling and screening parameters, even when the wavelength is comparable to the average interparticle spacing. In addition to the linear regime, our variational approach has potential for application to nonlinear problems and other physical systems.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.23006 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Longitudinal dispersion law in normalized variables for different values of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. The dimensionless longitudinal speed of sound, as defined in Eq. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. The longitudinal dispersion law at finite wavelengths in normalized variables for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. The longitudinal dispersion law at finite wavelengths in normalized variables for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

65 extracted references · 65 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Killian, T

    T. Killian, T. Pattard, T. Pohl, and J. Rost, Ultracold neutral plasmas, Phys. Rep. 449, 77 (2007)

    work page 2007

  2. [2]

    Lyon and S

    M. Lyon and S. L. Rolston, Ultracold neutral plasmas, Rep. Prog. Phys. 80, 017001 (2016)

    work page 2016

  3. [3]

    Castro, P

    J. Castro, P. McQuillen, and T. C. Killian, Ion Acoustic Waves in Ultracold Neutral Plasmas, Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 065004 (2010)

    work page 2010

  4. [4]

    T. C. Killian, P. McQuillen, T. M. O’Neil, and J. Castro, Creating and studying ion acoustic waves in ultracold neutral plasmas, Phys. Plasmas 19, 055701 (2012)

    work page 2012

  5. [5]

    R. T. Sprenkle, S. D. Bergeson, L. G. Silvestri, and M. S. Murillo, Ultracold neutral plasma expansion in a strong uniform magnetic field, Phys. Rev. E 105, 045201 (2022)

    work page 2022

  6. [6]

    F. Fang, W. Zhou, C. Luo, Y . Li, R. Cheng, X. Ma, and J. Yang, Ion dynamics in strongly coupled ultracold neutral plasmas at the early stage, Phys. Plasmas 30, 042108 (2023)

    work page 2023

  7. [7]

    G. E. Morfill and A. V . Ivlev, Complex plasmas: An interdisciplinary research field, Rev. Mod. Phys.81, 1353 (2009)

    work page 2009

  8. [8]

    Bonitz, C

    M. Bonitz, C. Henning, and D. Block, Complex plasmas: a laboratory for strong correlations, Rep. Prog. Phys. 73, 066501 (2010)

    work page 2010

Show all 65 references
  1. [9]

    Bandyopadhyay, G

    P. Bandyopadhyay, G. Prasad, A. Sen, and P. Kaw, Experimental observation of strong coupling effects on the dispersion of dust acoustic waves in a plasma, Phys. Lett. A 368, 491 (2007)

    2007

  2. [10]

    Heinrich, S.-H

    J. Heinrich, S.-H. Kim, and R. L. Merlino, Laboratory Observations of Self-Excited Dust Acoustic Shocks, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 115002 (2009)

    2009

  3. [11]

    S. H. Glenzer, O. L. Landen, P. Neumayer, R. W. Lee, K. Widmann, S. W. Pollaine, R. J. Wallace, G. Gregori, A. Höll, T. Bornath, R. Thiele, V . Schwarz, W.-D. Kraeft, and R. Redmer, Observations of Plasmons in Warm Dense Matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 065002 (2007)

    2007

  4. [12]

    K. Falk, C. A. McCoy, C. L. Fryer, C. W. Greeff, A. L. Hungerford, D. S. Montgomery, D. W. Schmidt, D. G. Sheppard, J. R. Williams, T. R. Boehly, and J. F. Benage, Temperature measurements of shocked silica aerogel foam, Phys. Rev. E90, 033107 (2014)

    2014

  5. [13]

    Zhang, A

    S. Zhang, A. Lazicki, B. Militzer, L. H. Yang, K. Caspersen, J. A. Gaffney, M. W. Däne, J. E. Pask, W. R. Johnson, A. Sharma, P. Suryanarayana, D. D. Johnson, A. V . Smirnov, P. A. Sterne, D. Erskine, R. A. London, F. Coppari, D. Swift, J. Nilsen, A. J. Nelson, and H. D. Whitl...

    2019

  6. [14]

    T. G. White, H. Poole, E. E. McBride, M. Oliver, A. Descamps, L. B. Fletcher, W. A. Angermeier, C. H. Allen, K. Appel, F. P. Condamine, C. B. Curry, F. Dallari, S. Funk, E. Galtier, E. J. Gamboa, M. Gauthier, P. Graham, S. Goede, D. Haden, J. B. Kim, H. J. Lee, B. K. Ofori- Ok...

    2024

  7. [15]

    Bataller, A

    A. Bataller, A. Latshaw, J. P. Koulakis, and S. Putterman, Dynamics of strongly coupled two-component plasma via ultrafast spectroscopy, Opt. Lett. 44, 5832 (2019)

    2019

  8. [16]

    Hosokawa, M

    S. Hosokawa, M. Inui, K. Matsuda, D. Ishikawa, and A. Q. R. Baron, Damping of the collective modes in liquid Fe, Phys. Rev. B 77, 174203 (2008)

    2008

  9. [17]

    Hosokawa, S

    S. Hosokawa, S. Munejiri, M. Inui, Y . Kajihara, W. C. Pilgrim, A. Q. R. Baron, F. Shimojo, and K. Hoshino, Transverse excitations in liquid metals, AIP Conf. Proc. 1518, 695 (2013)

    2013

  10. [18]

    Hosokawa, M

    S. Hosokawa, M. Inui, Y . Kajihara, S. Tsutsui, and A. Q. R. Baron, Transverse excitations in liquid Fe, Cu and Zn, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 27, 194104 (2015)

    2015

  11. [19]

    Demmel, S

    F. Demmel, S. Hosokawa, W.-C. Pilgrim, and S. Tsutsui, Evidences for optic modes in molten NaI, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 238, 98 (2005)

    2005

  12. [20]

    Demmel, S

    F. Demmel, S. Hosokawa, and W.-C. Pilgrim, Collective particle dynamics of molten NaCl by inelastic x-ray scattering, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 33, 375103 (2021)

    2021

  13. [21]

    Bonitz, J

    M. Bonitz, J. V orberger, M. Bethkenhagen, M. P. Böhme, D. M. Ceperley, A. Filinov, T. Gawne, F. Graziani, G. Gregori, P. Hamann, S. B. Hansen, M. Holzmann, S. X. Hu, H. Kählert, V . V . Karasiev, U. Kleinschmidt, L. Kordts, C. Makait, B. Militzer, Z. A. Moldabekov, C. Pierleo...

    2024

  14. [22]

    Krimans and S

    D. Krimans and S. Putterman, Variational principles for the hydrodynamics of the classical one-component plasma, Phys. Fluids 36, 037131 (2024)

    2024

  15. [23]

    L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, Mechanics: V olume 1 (Course of Theoretical Physics), 3rd ed. (Butterworth-Heinemann, 1976)

    1976

  16. [24]

    L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, The Classical Theory of Fields: V olume 2 (Course of Theoretical Physics) , 4th ed. (Butterworth- Heinemann, 1980)

    1980

  17. [25]

    J. W. Herivel, The derivation of the equations of motion of an ideal fluid by Hamilton’s principle, Math. Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc. 51, 344–349 (1955)

    1955

  18. [26]

    R. L. Seliger and G. B. Whitham, Variational principles in continuum mechanics, Proc. R. Soc. A 305, 1 (1968)

    1968

  19. [27]

    J. P. Mithen, J. Daligault, and G. Gregori, Onset of negative dispersion in the one-component plasma, AIP Conf. Proc. 1421, 68 (2012)

    2012

  20. [28]

    Kählert, Dynamic local field correction of the one-component plasma, Phys

    H. Kählert, Dynamic local field correction of the one-component plasma, Phys. Plasmas 31, 092109 (2024)

    2024

  21. [29]

    S. A. Khrapak, A. G. Khrapak, N. P. Kryuchkov, and S. O. Yurchenko, Onset of transverse (shear) waves in strongly-coupled Yukawa fluids, J. Chem. Phys. 150, 104503 (2019)

    2019

  22. [30]

    J. P. Hansen and I. R. McDonald, Theory of Simple Liquids , 3rd ed. (Academic Press, 2006)

    2006

  23. [31]

    Tolias, S

    P. Tolias, S. Ratynskaia, and U. de Angelis, Soft mean spherical approximation for dusty plasma liquids: One-component Yukawa systems with plasma shielding, Phys. Rev. E 90, 053101 (2014)

    2014

  24. [32]

    Hamaguchi, R

    S. Hamaguchi, R. T. Farouki, and D. H. E. Dubin, Triple point of Yukawa systems, Phys. Rev. E56, 4671 (1997)

    1997

  25. [33]

    J. M. Caillol and D. Gilles, Monte Carlo Simulations of the Yukawa One-Component Plasma, J. Stat. Phys. 100, 933–947 (2000)

    2000

  26. [34]

    S. A. Khrapak and H. M. Thomas, Practical expressions for the internal energy and pressure of Yukawa fluids, Phys. Rev. E 91, 023108 (2015)

    2015

  27. [35]

    S. A. Khrapak, Thermodynamics of Yukawa systems and sound velocity in dusty plasmas, Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 58, 014022 (2015)

    2015

  28. [36]

    S. A. Khrapak, B. Klumov, L. Couëdel, and H. M. Thomas, On the long-waves dispersion in Yukawa systems, Phys. Plasmas23, 023702 (2016)

    2016

  29. [37]

    L. G. Silvestri, G. J. Kalman, Z. Donkó, P. Hartmann, M. Rosenberg, K. I. Golden, and S. Kyrkos, Sound speed in Yukawa one-component plasmas across coupling regimes, Phys. Rev. E 100, 063206 (2019)

    2019

  30. [38]

    Kalman and K

    G. Kalman and K. I. Golden, Response function and plasmon dispersion for strongly coupled Coulomb liquids, Phys. Rev. A 41, 5516 (1990)

    1990

  31. [39]

    K. I. Golden and G. J. Kalman, Quasilocalized charge approximation in strongly coupled plasma physics, Phys. Plasmas 7, 14 (2000)

    2000

  32. [40]

    Donkó, G

    Z. Donkó, G. J. Kalman, and P. Hartmann, Dynamical correlations and collective excitations of Yukawa liquids, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 20, 413101 (2008)

    2008

  33. [41]

    L.-J. Hou, Z. L. Miškovi ´c, A. Piel, and M. S. Murillo, Wave spectra of two-dimensional dusty plasma solids and liquids, Phys. Rev. E79, 046412 (2009)

    2009

  34. [42]

    T. Ott, D. A. Baiko, H. Kählert, and M. Bonitz, Wave spectra of a strongly coupled magnetized one-component plasma: Quasilocalized charge approximation versus harmonic lattice theory and molecular dynamics, Phys. Rev. E87, 043102 (2013)

    2013

  35. [43]

    S. A. Khrapak, Onset of negative dispersion in one-component-plasma revisited, Phys. Plasmas 23, 104506 (2016)

    2016

  36. [44]

    Kählert, Dynamics of strongly correlated quantum systems from an extended Singwi-Tosi-Land-Sjölander closure for the BBGKY hierarchy, Contrib

    H. Kählert, Dynamics of strongly correlated quantum systems from an extended Singwi-Tosi-Land-Sjölander closure for the BBGKY hierarchy, Contrib. Plasma Phys. 64, e202400018 (2024)

    2024

  37. [45]

    Salin, Hydrodynamic limit of the Yukawa one-component plasma, Phys

    G. Salin, Hydrodynamic limit of the Yukawa one-component plasma, Phys. Plasmas 14, 082316 (2007)

    2007

  38. [46]

    N. Rao, P. Shukla, and M. Yu, Dust-acoustic waves in dusty plasmas, Planet. Space Sci. 38, 543 (1990)

    1990

  39. [47]

    S. A. Khrapak and H. M. Thomas, Fluid approach to evaluate sound velocity in Yukawa systems and complex plasmas, Phys. Rev. E 91, 033110 (2015)

    2015

  40. [48]

    Y . V . Arkhipov, A. Askaruly, A. E. Davletov, D. Y . Dubovtsev, Z. Donkó, P. Hartmann, I. Korolov, L. Conde, and I. M. Tkachenko, Direct Determination of Dynamic Properties of Coulomb and Yukawa Classical One-Component Plasmas, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 045001 (2017)

    2017

  41. [49]

    Y . V . Arkhipov, A. Ashikbayeva, A. Askaruly, A. E. Davletov, D. Y . Dubovtsev, K. S. Santybayev, S. A. Syzganbayeva, L. Conde, and I. M. Tkachenko, Dynamic characteristics of three-dimensional strongly coupled plasmas, Phys. Rev. E 102, 053215 (2020)

    2020

  42. [50]

    Khrapak and L

    S. Khrapak and L. Couëdel, Dispersion relations of Yukawa fluids at weak and moderate coupling, Phys. Rev. E 102, 033207 (2020). 17

    2020

  43. [51]

    Tolias and F

    P. Tolias and F. Lucco Castello, Description of longitudinal modes in moderately coupled Yukawa systems with the static local field correction, Phys. Plasmas 28, 034502 (2021)

    2021

  44. [52]

    Hamaguchi and R

    S. Hamaguchi and R. T. Farouki, Thermodynamics of strongly-coupled Yukawa systems near the one-component-plasma limit. I. Deriva- tion of the excess energy, J. Chem. Phys. 101, 9876 (1994)

    1994

  45. [53]

    S. G. Brush, H. L. Sahlin, and E. Teller, Monte Carlo Study of a One-Component Plasma. I, J. Chem. Phys. 45, 2102 (1966)

    1966

  46. [54]

    Kalman, M

    G. Kalman, M. Rosenberg, and H. E. DeWitt, Collective Modes in Strongly Correlated Yukawa Liquids: Waves in Dusty Plasmas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 6030 (2000)

    2000

  47. [55]

    L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, Statistical Physics: V olume 5 (Course of Theoretical Physics), 3rd ed. (Elsevier, 1980)

    1980

  48. [56]

    O. S. Vaulina and S. A. Khrapak, Scaling law for the fluid-solid phase transition in Yukawa systems (dusty plasmas), J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 90, 287 (2000)

    2000

  49. [57]

    Vaulina, S

    O. Vaulina, S. Khrapak, and G. Morfill, Universal scaling in complex (dusty) plasmas, Phys. Rev. E 66, 016404 (2002)

    2002

  50. [58]

    T. Ott, M. Bonitz, L. G. Stanton, and M. S. Murillo, Coupling strength in Coulomb and Yukawa one-component plasmas, Phys. Plasmas 21, 113704 (2014)

    2014

  51. [59]

    I. I. Fairushin, S. A. Khrapak, and A. V . Mokshin, Direct evaluation of the physical characteristics of Yukawa fluids based on a simple approximation for the radial distribution function, Results Phys. 19, 103359 (2020)

    2020

  52. [60]

    Kählert, Thermodynamic and transport coefficients from the dynamic structure factor of Yukawa liquids, Phys

    H. Kählert, Thermodynamic and transport coefficients from the dynamic structure factor of Yukawa liquids, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 033287 (2020)

    2020

  53. [61]

    L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, Fluid Mechanics: V olume 6 (Course of Theoretical Physics), 2nd ed. (Butterworth-Heinemann, 1987)

    1987

  54. [62]

    J. P. Mithen, J. Daligault, and G. Gregori, Extent of validity of the hydrodynamic description of ions in dense plasmas, Phys. Rev. E 83, 015401 (2011)

    2011

  55. [63]

    A. P. Thompson, H. M. Aktulga, R. Berger, D. S. Bolintineanu, W. M. Brown, P. S. Crozier, P. J. in ’t Veld, A. Kohlmeyer, S. G. Moore, T. D. Nguyen, R. Shan, M. J. Stevens, J. Tranchida, C. Trott, and S. J. Plimpton, LAMMPS - a flexible simulation tool for particle-based mater...

    2022

  56. [64]

    Kählert, Dynamic structure factor of strongly coupled Yukawa plasmas with dissipation, Phys

    H. Kählert, Dynamic structure factor of strongly coupled Yukawa plasmas with dissipation, Phys. Plasmas 26, 063703 (2019)

    2019

  57. [65]

    C. P. Frahm, Some novel delta-function identities, Am. J. Phys. 51, 826 (1983)

    1983

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.