Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 minor 2 cited by

Dimension and model reduction approaches for linear Bayesian inverse problems with rank-deficient prior covariances

T0 review · 0 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-05-19 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Dimension and model reduction exploit data-informed subspaces to approximate posteriors efficiently in linear Bayesian inverse problems with rank-deficient priors.

desk verdict This paper gives workable dimension reduction for general linear Bayesian inverses with rank-deficient priors plus targeted model reduction for linear dynamical system initial conditions, backed by error bounds and numerics. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.23892 v2 submitted 2025-06-30 math.NA cs.NAcs.SYeess.SY

Josie König , Elizabeth Qian , Melina A. Freitag This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.NAcs.NAcs.SYeess.SY
keywords Bayesianinverseproblemsdimensionreductionmodelrank-deficientpriorslineardynamicalsystemsposteriorapproximationnumericalanalysis
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Bayesian inverse problems often involve high-dimensional unknowns, but data typically constrain only a low-dimensional part of the space. This paper develops dimension reduction that restricts sampling to the subspace informed by the data, applicable to general linear problems even when the prior covariance has deficient rank. For inferring initial conditions in linear dynamical systems it adds model reduction that replaces expensive forward simulations with cheaper lower-dimensional versions. Both methods include theoretical guarantees that bound how much the approximate posterior can differ from the full one. The payoff is feasible computation of posteriors that would otherwise require prohibitive sampling and model evaluations.

What carries the argument

The data-informed low-dimensional subspace of the parameter space, which carries the argument by letting the prior and posterior be represented and sampled only within that subspace, together with reduced forward operators for dynamical systems that lower the cost of each likelihood evaluation.

What would settle it

A concrete counter-example in which the Wasserstein distance or covariance error between the reduced posterior and the exact posterior exceeds the paper's derived bound on a linear test problem with known ground-truth posterior would falsify the approximation guarantees.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

For linear Bayesian inverse problems with rank-deficient prior covariances, restricting inference to the low-dimensional subspace informed by the data yields posterior approximations with provable accuracy guarantees; for the special case of initial-condition inference in linear dynamical systems, replacing the forward map with a reduced-order model achieves similar efficiency while preserving the same guarantees.

Load-bearing premise

The data inform only a low-dimensional subspace of the parameter space and the forward model can be accurately approximated by a reduced model without introducing errors that propagate into the posterior in uncontrolled ways.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Posterior sampling becomes feasible at far lower cost by operating only in the informed directions rather than the full space.
  • For dynamical-system initial-condition problems the number of expensive forward evaluations drops while the posterior remains close to the unreduced one.
  • Error bounds supplied by the theory let practitioners choose reduction dimensions that meet a target accuracy level.
  • The same framework applies directly to many engineering and science settings where priors are singular because of conservation laws or discretization choices.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The subspace idea might carry over to mildly nonlinear forward maps if the effective dimension of the data-informed region stays small locally.
  • Pairing the reductions with existing MCMC or ensemble samplers could produce practical codes for real-time data assimilation.
  • Studying how the rank deficiency interacts with the choice of reduced basis could yield adaptive algorithms that pick the smallest sufficient subspace automatically.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops dimension reduction techniques for general linear Bayesian inverse problems with rank-deficient prior covariances, exploiting the low-dimensional data-informed subspace via range-nullspace decomposition of the prior covariance and its pseudo-inverse. It also introduces model reduction approaches targeted at initial-condition inference for linear dynamical systems, deriving posterior approximation bounds that control contributions from the data-informed subspace and reduced-model errors. Theoretical guarantees are provided alongside numerical experiments demonstrating accuracy and efficiency for linear forward operators.

Significance. If the bounds hold, the work offers a practical advance for high-dimensional Bayesian inference by directly addressing rank-deficient priors common in applications such as initial-condition estimation. The explicit control of approximation errors in the relevant norms and the separation of dimension versus model reduction represent clear strengths, with the numerical confirmation for linear cases supporting applicability.

minor comments (3)
  1. [§2.1] §2.1: the notation for the pseudo-inverse and the orthogonal decomposition of the prior covariance could be accompanied by a brief remark on how the nullspace component is handled in sampling to improve readability.
  2. [Numerical experiments] Table 1 and Figure 3: the reported error norms and computational timings would benefit from explicit statement of the parameter dimensions and the number of Monte Carlo samples used, to allow direct comparison with unreduced baselines.
  3. [Introduction] The abstract states that model reduction is specific to initial-condition inference; a short sentence in the introduction clarifying why the same reduction does not immediately extend to general parameter inference would avoid potential reader confusion.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of the manuscript, accurate summary of our dimension and model reduction techniques for linear Bayesian inverse problems with rank-deficient prior covariances, and recommendation for minor revision. We appreciate the recognition of the practical advances, theoretical guarantees, and numerical experiments.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity; new reduction techniques with independent theoretical guarantees

full rationale

The paper proposes dimension and model reduction methods for linear Bayesian inverse problems with rank-deficient priors, deriving approximation bounds from the range-nullspace decomposition of the prior covariance via its pseudo-inverse and explicit control of data-informed subspace contributions. These steps are self-contained mathematical constructions that do not reduce to fitted parameters renamed as predictions, self-definitional loops, or load-bearing self-citations whose validity depends on the current work. The central claims rest on standard linear algebra and posterior analysis rather than circular reductions, consistent with the reader's assessment of independent content.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard assumptions from Bayesian inverse problems and linear algebra; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

assumptions (2)
  • domain assumption The forward model is linear and the prior covariance is rank-deficient but positive semi-definite.
    Invoked in the setup of the inverse problem throughout the abstract.
  • domain assumption Data are informative only in a low-dimensional subspace of the parameter space.
    Core motivation for dimension reduction stated in the abstract.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Dimension and model reduction approaches for linear Bayesian inverse problems with rank-deficient prior covariances." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2506.23892

@misc{pith2026250623892,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Dimension and model reduction approaches for linear Bayesian inverse problems with rank-deficient prior covariances},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2506.23892}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.23892}
}
read the original abstract

Bayesian inverse problems use observed data to update a prior probability distribution for an unknown state or parameter of a scientific system to a posterior distribution conditioned on the data. In many applications, the unknown parameter is high-dimensional, making computation of the posterior expensive due to the need to sample in a high-dimensional space and the need to evaluate an expensive high-dimensional forward model relating the unknown parameter to the data. However, inverse problems often exhibit low-dimensional structure due to the fact that the available data are only informative in a low-dimensional subspace of the parameter space. Dimension reduction approaches exploit this structure by restricting inference to the low-dimensional subspace informed by the data, which can be sampled more efficiently. Further computational cost reductions can be achieved by replacing expensive high-dimensional forward models with cheaper lower-dimensional reduced models. In this work, we propose new dimension and model reduction approaches for linear Bayesian inverse problems with rank-deficient prior covariances, which arise in many practical inference settings. The dimension reduction approach is applicable to general linear Bayesian inverse problems whereas the model reduction approaches are specific to the problem of inferring the initial condition of a linear dynamical system. We provide theoretical approximation guarantees as well as numerical experiments demonstrating the accuracy and efficiency of the proposed approaches.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Error bounds for approximate posteriors from likelihood-informed reduced-order models

    math.NA 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Derives error bounds on the root prior-preconditioned Hessian, posterior covariance, and mean for a Petrov-Galerkin reduced-order model, with exact posterior recovery at the intrinsic dimension.

  2. Likelihood-informed Model Reduction for Bayesian Inference of Static Structural Loads

    math.NA 2025-10 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Projecting a linear static PDE model onto the likelihood-informed subspace yields a reduced-order model that matches full-order Bayesian posterior accuracy at one-tenth to one-hundredth the dimension.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 51 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [2]

    , title =

    Antoulas, A.C.: Approximation of Large-Scale Dynamical Systems. SIAM, Philadelphia (2005). https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9780898718713

    work page doi:10.1137/1.9780898718713 2005

  2. [3]

    SIAM, Philadelphia (2018)

    Bardsley, J.M.: Computational Uncertainty Quantification for Inverse Problems. SIAM, Philadelphia (2018). https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9781611975383

    work page doi:10.1137/1.9781611975383 2018

  3. [4]

    Brasseur, P., Ballabrera-Poy, J., Verron, J.: Assimilation of altimetric data in the mid-latitude oceans using the Singular Evolutive Extended Kalman filter with an eddy-resolving, primitive equation model. J. Mar. Syst. 22(4), 269–294 (1999) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-7963(99)00044-5

    work page doi:10.1016/s0924-7963(99)00044-5 1999

  4. [5]

    Beattie, C., Gugercin, S., Mehrmann, V.: Model reduction for systems with inhomogeneous initial conditions. Syst. Control Lett. 99, 99–106 (2017) https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.sysconle.2016.11.007

    work page doi:10.1016/j.sysconle.2016.11.007 2017

  5. [6]

    Bui-Thanh, T., Ghattas, O., Martin, J., Stadler, G.: A Computational Framework for Infinite-Dimensional Bayesian Inverse Problems Part I: The Linearized Case, with Application to Global Seismic Inversion. SIAM J. Sci. Comput.35(6), 2494– 2523 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1137/12089586X

    work page doi:10.1137/12089586x 2013

  6. [7]

    Benner, S

    Benner, P., Gugercin, S., Willcox, K.: A survey of projection-based model reduc- tion methods for parametric dynamical systems. SIAM Rev. 57(4), 483–531 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1137/130932715

    work page doi:10.1137/130932715 2015

  7. [8]

    Buehner, M., McTaggart-Cowan, R., Heilliette, S.: An ensemble Kalman fil- ter for numerical weather prediction based on variational data assimilation: VarEnKF. Mon. Weather Rev. 145(2), 617–635 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1175/ MWR-D-16-0106.1

    work page 2017

  8. [9]

    Kothari, Yang P

    Benner, P., Ohlberger, M., Cohen, A., Willcox, K. (eds.): Model Reduc- tion and Approximation. SIAM, Philadelphia (2017). https://doi.org/10.1137/1. 9781611974829 21

    work page doi:10.1137/1 2017

Show all 51 references
  1. [10]

    GAMM-Mitt

    Benner, P., Saak, J.: Numerical solution of large and sparse continuous time algebraic matrix Riccati and Lyapunov equations: A state of the art survey. GAMM-Mitt. 36(1), 32–52 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1002/gamm.201310003

    2013 doi

  2. [11]

    (eds.) Error Statistics in Data Assimilation: Estimation and Modelling, pp

    Buehner, M.: In: Lahoz, W., Khattatov, B., Menard, R. (eds.) Error Statistics in Data Assimilation: Estimation and Modelling, pp. 93–112. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74703-1 5

    2010 doi

  3. [12]

    WIREs Climate Change 9(5), 535 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.535

    Carrassi, A., Bocquet, M., Bertino, L., Evensen, G.: Data assimilation in the geosciences: An overview of methods, issues, and perspectives. WIREs Climate Change 9(5), 535 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.535

    2018 doi

  4. [13]

    Chapman and Hall/CRC, New York (2009)

    Carlin, B.P., Louis, T.A.: Bayesian Methods for Data Analysis. Chapman and Hall/CRC, New York (2009). https://doi.org/10.1201/b14884

    2009 doi

  5. [14]

    Inverse Probl

    Cui, T., Martin, J., Marzouk, Y.M., Solonen, A., Spantini, A.: Likelihood- informed dimension reduction for nonlinear inverse problems. Inverse Probl. 30(11), 114015 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1088/0266-5611/30/11/114015

    2014 doi

  6. [15]

    Inverse Probl

    Cui, T., Zahm, O.: Data-free likelihood-informed dimension reduction of Bayesian inverse problems. Inverse Probl. 37(4), 045009 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1088/ 1361-6420/abeafb

    2021

  7. [16]

    In: Handbook of Uncertainty Quantification, pp

    Dashti, M., Stuart, A.M.: The Bayesian approach to inverse problems. In: Handbook of Uncertainty Quantification, pp. 311–428. Springer, Cham (2017). https://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007/978-3-319-12385-1 7

    2017 doi

  8. [17]

    PAMM 24(4), 202400051 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1002/pamm

    Freitag, M.A., K¨ onig, J., Qian, E.: Inference-oriented balanced truncation for quadratic dynamical systems: Formulation for Bayesian smoothing and model sta- bility analysis. PAMM 24(4), 202400051 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1002/pamm. 202400051

    2024 doi

  9. [18]

    In: Gra- farend, E.W., Krumm, F.W., Schwarze, V.S

    F¨ orstner, W., Moonen, B.: A metric for covariance matrices. In: Gra- farend, E.W., Krumm, F.W., Schwarze, V.S. (eds.) Geodesy-The Challenge of the 3rd Millennium, pp. 299–309. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2003). https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-662-05296-9 31

    2003 doi

  10. [19]

    Flath, H.P., Wilcox, L.C., Ak¸ celik, V., Hill, J., Van Bloemen Waanders, B., Ghat- tas, O.: Fast Algorithms for Bayesian Uncertainty Quantification in Large-Scale Linear Inverse Problems Based on Low-Rank Partial Hessian Approximations. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 33(1), 407–432 (20...

    2011 doi

  11. [20]

    Gugercin, S., Antoulas, A.C., Beattie, C.: H2 model reduction for large-scale linear dynamical systems. SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl. 30(2), 609–638 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1137/060666123 22

    2008 doi

  12. [21]

    Galbally, D., Fidkowski, K., Willcox, K., Ghattas, O.: Non-linear model reduc- tion for uncertainty quantification in large-scale inverse problems. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 81(12), 1581–1608 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.2746

    2010 doi

  13. [22]

    Internat

    Gawronski, W., Juang, J.-N.: Model reduction in limited time and frequency inter- vals. Internat. J. Systems Sci. 21(2), 349–376 (1990) https://doi.org/10.1080/ 00207729008910366

    1990

  14. [23]

    Springer, Cham (2021)

    Heard, N.: An Introduction to Bayesian Inference, Methods and Computation. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82808-0

    2021 doi

  15. [24]

    SIAM, Philadel- phia (2008)

    Higham, N.J.: Functions of Matrices: Theory and Computation. SIAM, Philadel- phia (2008). https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9780898717778

    2008 doi

  16. [25]

    Haben, S.A., Lawless, A.S., Nichols, N.K.: Conditioning and preconditioning of the variational data assimilation problem. Comput. Fluids 46(1), 252–256 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2010.11.025

    2011 doi

  17. [26]

    Houtekamer, P.L., Mitchell, H.L., Pellerin, G., Buehner, M., Charron, M., Spacek, L., Hansen, B.: Atmospheric data assimilation with an ensemble Kalman filter: Results with real observations. Mon. Weather Rev.133(3), 604–620 (2005) https: //doi.org/10.1175/MWR-2864.1

    2005 doi

  18. [27]

    Automatica 47(3), 559–564 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2010.12.002

    Heinkenschloss, M., Reis, T., Antoulas, A.C.: Balanced truncation model reduc- tion for systems with inhomogeneous initial conditions. Automatica 47(3), 559–564 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2010.12.002

    2011 doi

  19. [28]

    Springer, Cham (2015)

    Hesthaven, J.S., Rozza, G., Stamm, B.: Certified Reduced Basis Methods for Parametrized Partial Differential Equations. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi. org/10.1007/978-3-319-22470-1

    2015 doi

  20. [29]

    K¨ onig, J., Freitag, M.A.: Time-limited balanced truncation for data assim- ilation problems. J. Sci. Comput. 97(47) (2023) https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10915-023-02358-4

    2023

  21. [30]

    PAMM 23(3), 202300019 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1002/pamm.202300019

    K¨ onig, J., Freitag, M.A.: Time-limited balanced truncation within incremental four-dimensional variational data assimilation. PAMM 23(3), 202300019 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1002/pamm.202300019

    2023 doi

  22. [31]

    Kitanidis, P.K.: Compressed state Kalman filter for large systems. Adv. Water Resour. 76, 120–126 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2014.12.010

    2015 doi

  23. [32]

    K¨ urschner, P.: Balanced truncation model order reduction in limited time inter- vals for large systems. Adv. Comput. Math. 44(6), 1821–1844 (2018) https: //doi.org/10.1007/s10444-018-9608-6

    2018 doi

  24. [33]

    Livings, D.M., Dance, S.L., Nichols, N.K.: Unbiased ensemble square root filters. 23 Phys. D: Nonlinear Phenom. 237(8), 1021–1028 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.physd.2008.01.005

    2008

  25. [34]

    Lipponen, A., Seppanen, A., Kaipio, J.P.: Electrical impedance tomography imaging with reduced-order model based on proper orthogonal decomposition. J. Electron. Imaging 22(2), 023008 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JEI.22.2. 023008

    2013 doi

  26. [35]

    Texts in Applied Mathematics

    Law, K., Stuart, A., Zygalakis, K.: Data Assimilation: A Mathematical Introduc- tion. Texts in Applied Mathematics. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10. 1007/978-3-319-20325-6

    2015

  27. [36]

    SIAM Rev

    Lieberman, C., Willcox, K.: Goal-oriented inference: Approach, linear theory, and application to advection diffusion. SIAM Rev. 55(3), 493–519 (2013) https: //doi.org/10.1137/130913110

    2013 doi

  28. [37]

    Lieberman, C., Willcox, K., Ghattas, O.: Parameter and state model reduction for large-scale statistical inverse problems. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 32(5), 2523–2542 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1137/090775622

    2010 doi

  29. [38]

    IEEE Trans

    Moore, B.: Principal component analysis in linear systems: Controllability, observ- ability, and model reduction. IEEE Trans. Automat. Control 26(1), 17–32 (1981) https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.1981.1102568

    1981 doi

  30. [39]

    IEEE Trans

    Mullis, C., Roberts, R.: Synthesis of minimum roundoff noise fixed point digital filters. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst.23(9), 551–562 (1976) https://doi.org/10.1109/ TCS.1976.1084254

    1976

  31. [40]

    Martin, J., Wilcox, L.C., Burstedde, C., Ghattas, O.: A Stochastic Newton MCMC Method for Large-Scale Statistical Inverse Problems with Application to Seismic Inversion. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 34(3), 1460–1487 (2012) https: //doi.org/10.1137/110845598

    2012 doi

  32. [41]

    (eds.) Data Assimilation for Numerical Weather Prediction: A Review

    Navon, I.M.: In: Park, S.K., Xu, L. (eds.) Data Assimilation for Numerical Weather Prediction: A Review. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2009). https://doi. org/10.1007/978-3-540-71056-1 2

    2009 doi

  33. [42]

    Asia Pac

    Nguyen, N., Cheong Khoo, B., Willcox, K.: Model order reduction for Bayesian approach to inverse problems. Asia Pac. J. Comput. Engin 1(2) (2014) https: //doi.org/10.1186/2196-1166-1-2

    2014 doi

  34. [43]

    Qian, E., Tabeart, J.M., Beattie, C., Gugercin, S., Jiang, J., Kramer, P.R., Narayan, A.: Model reduction for linear dynamical systems via balancing for Bayesian inference. J. Sci. Comput. 91(29) (2022) https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10915-022-01798-8

    2022

  35. [44]

    SIAM Rev

    Rozier, D., Birol, F., Cosme, E., Brasseur, P., Brankart, J.M., Verron, J.: A 24 reduced-order Kalman filter for data assimilation in physical oceanography. SIAM Rev. 49(3), 449–465 (2007) https://doi.org/10.1137/050635717

    2007 doi

  36. [45]

    Spantini, A., Solonen, A., Cui, T., Martin, J., Tenorio, L., Marzouk, Y.: Opti- mal low-rank approximations of Bayesian linear inverse problems. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 37(6), 2451–2487 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1137/140977308

    2015 doi

  37. [46]

    Schr¨ oder, C., Voigt, M.: Balanced truncation model reduction with a priori error bounds for LTI systems with nonzero initial value. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 420, 114708 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2022.114708

    2023 doi

  38. [47]

    SIAM, Philadelphia (2005)

    Tarantola, A.: Inverse Problem Theory and Methods for Model Parameter Esti- mation. SIAM, Philadelphia (2005). https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9780898717921

    2005 doi

  39. [48]

    Tuan Pham, D., Verron, J., Christine Roubaud, M.: A singular evolutive extended Kalman filter for data assimilation in oceanography. J. Mar. Syst. 16(3), 323–340 (1998) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-7963(97)00109-7

    1998 doi

  40. [49]

    van Leeuwen, P.J.: Nonlinear data assimilation in geosciences: an extremely effi- cient particle filter. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 136(653), 1991–1999 (2010) https: //doi.org/10.1002/qj.699

    1991 doi

  41. [50]

    Stochastic Hydrol

    Verlaan, M., Heemink, A.W.: Tidal flow forecasting using reduced rank square root filters. Stochastic Hydrol. Hydraul. 11, 349–368 (1997) https://doi.org/10. 1007/BF02427924

    1997

  42. [51]

    Wang, J., Zabaras, N.: Using Bayesian statistics in the estimation of heat source in radiation. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 48(1), 15–29 (2005) https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2004.08.009

    2005

  43. [52]

    Zahm, O., Cui, T., Law, K., Spantini, A., Marzouk, Y.: Certified dimension reduc- tion in nonlinear Bayesian inverse problems. Math. Comput.91, 1789–1835 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1090/MCOM/3737 25

    2022 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed May 19, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.