Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 127 references

A possible two-fold scenario for the disc-corona of the luminous AGN 1H 0419--577: a high-density disc or a warm corona

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The luminous AGN 1H 0419-577 admits two equally good spectral descriptions—a high-density reflecting disc or a warm corona plus reflection—and the missing Compton hump is not a unique sign of a cool corona.

desk verdict Solid, honest paper that sharpens the soft-excess degeneracy for 1H 0419-577, but the warm-corona leg is weaker than the reflection leg because of a grid mismatch. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.23920 v1 pith:3SHOI4BN submitted 2025-06-30 astro-ph.HE

Delphine Porquet , James N. Reeves , Valentina Braito This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.HE
keywords 1H0419-577activegalacticnucleisoftX-rayexcesswarmcoronarelativisticreflectionaccretiondiscdensityXMM-NewtonandNuSTARspectroscopyspectralenergydistribution
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Using the first simultaneous XMM-Newton and NuSTAR observations of the luminous active galactic nucleus (AGN) 1H 0419-577, this paper tries to establish what produces its soft X-ray excess (extra smooth emission below about 2 keV) and why its hard X-ray spectrum shows no Compton hump, the bump expected when coronal photons reflect off the disc. It finds that the two 2018 broadband spectra, observed in a bare-like high-flux state with a broad OVII line from the inner disc, are reproduced equally well by two physically different models: relativistic reflection off a very dense accretion disc, or a hybrid of a warm optically thick corona with a hot corona and relativistic reflection. The paper argues that the data cannot distinguish these pictures, even though the pictures imply different disc densities, corona temperatures, and divisions of accretion power. If that is right, spectral signatures that are used across the AGN population to infer disc-corona physics are more ambiguous than often assumed.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by a spectral degeneracy between two emission mechanisms. In one picture, relativistic reflection off a disc whose density is raised to $10^{18}$ cm$^{-3}$ boosts free-free emission enough to create a soft X-ray excess and flatten the hard band without a Compton hump, pushing the hot corona temperature to several hundred keV. In the other, a warm, optically thick corona (temperature near 0.4 keV, optical depth about 13) Compton-upscatters UV/optical seed photons into the soft excess, while a hot corona and relativistic reflection shape the higher energies. The simultaneous XMM-Newton and NuSTAR coverage, the clean line of sight, and the broad OVII line from the inner disc are the diagnostics used to compare the two.

What would settle it

Run a simultaneous UV-to-hard-X-ray timing campaign on 1H 0419-577 and measure the lag of the soft X-ray excess behind the hot-corona continuum; the warm-corona hybrid predicts a short UV-correlated lag with a smooth soft continuum, while high-density reflection predicts a soft excess that responds to hard-X-ray reprocessing on the inner-disc light-crossing time.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

At both 2018 epochs, 1H 0419-577 showed a bare-like, absorption-free high-flux state in X-rays, with several broad soft X-ray emission lines and a broad OVII line pointing to an origin tens of gravitational radii from the black hole. Fitting only data above 3 keV yields moderate apparent hot-corona temperatures of about 20-30 keV, with no change between 2015 and 2018. Fitting the full 0.3-79 keV band, however, gives two equally good descriptions: relativistic reflection off an accretion disc with density near $10^{18}$ cm$^{-3}$ and a hot corona of several hundred keV, or a hybrid model with a warm corona (temperature near 0.4 keV, optical depth about 13), a hot corona at roughly 20-40 keV, and a standard disc density near $10^{15}$ cm$^{-3}$. The paper's claim is that the missing Compton hump is not uniquely a low-temperature-corona signature, that the broad OVII line can act as a soft-band relativistic reflection probe, and that telling the scenarios apart will require timing, multi-epoch, or higher-resolution data.

Load-bearing premise

The warm-corona leg of the degeneracy depends on applying model grids computed for a black hole fed at ten percent of its maximum rate to 1H 0419-577, which during these observations was fed at fifty to sixty percent of maximum; the authors flag in Appendix C that this assumption may not be appropriate.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • An absent Compton hump in a luminous AGN cannot by itself be read as evidence for a low-temperature hot corona, because the high-density reflection fit allows corona temperatures of several hundred keV.
  • If the high-density reflection scenario is right, roughly 93-98 percent of the accretion power is released in the hot corona, making the observed optical-UV bump difficult to explain without additional reprocessing.
  • If the hybrid warm-corona scenario is right, the hot and warm coronae are both compact (hot radius about 6-7 gravitational radii, warm corona extending only 1.3-1.9 times further), and the accretion disc remains at a standard density near $10^{15}$ cm$^{-3}$.
  • Broad OVII emission can serve, in bare AGNs at moderate inclination, as a soft-band analogue of the broad Fe Kalpha line for probing relativistic reflection within tens of gravitational radii.
  • Breaking the degeneracy will require multi-wavelength timing, multi-epoch broadband spectra at different flux states, and higher spectral resolution, rather than deeper versions of the same 2018 data.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • An extension the authors leave implicit: if this degeneracy is generic, published hot-corona temperatures inferred from high-energy cut-offs may be systematically low for luminous AGNs, since a high-density disc can absorb the Compton hump signature.
  • Because the warm-corona grids used here were computed for an Eddington accretion rate of 0.1 while 1H 0419-577 accretes at about 0.5-0.6, recomputing the grids at a higher accretion rate is a direct testable extension that could shift the inferred warm-corona heating fractions.
  • A time-domain test would be a simultaneous UV-to-X-ray reverberation campaign: the warm-corona hybrid predicts a short, correlated UV-soft-X-ray lag, whereas high-density reflection predicts a soft excess that follows hard-X-ray reprocessing on an inner-disc light-crossing time.
  • X-ray polarimetry is another untested diagnostic: a compact warm corona and a reflecting high-density disc should imprint different polarization signatures on the soft and hard bands.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper presents a spectral analysis of the luminous, highly accreting AGN 1H 0419-577 using the first simultaneous XMM-Newton and NuSTAR observations from May and November 2018, supplemented by a 2015 NuSTAR observation. The authors find a bare-like state with negligible warm absorption and detect broad soft X-ray emission lines, most notably a broad O VII line consistent with an origin in the inner accretion disc. Fits above 3 keV yield hot corona temperatures of about 17-28 keV depending on the model. Over the full 0.3-79 keV band, the authors show that relativistic reflection onto a standard-density disc fails, while a high-density disc (log n_e ~ 18.1-19.5 cm^-3) reproduces the data well. They also show that a hybrid scenario combining a warm corona, a hot corona, and relativistic reflection fits the broadband spectra and the UV-to-X-ray SED (chi2_red ~ 1.06-1.08 for the comptt+reflkerrd and relagn+reflkerrd models), while the more physical reXcor grids give chi2_red ~ 1.30. The central claim is that both scenarios can reproduce the 2018 observations but imply very different physical conditions for the disc-corona system.

Significance. The paper is a careful, data-rich study that brings new simultaneous XMM-Newton and NuSTAR coverage to a well-known AGN. Its strengths include a detailed RGS analysis, the use of publicly available physical models, checks against local chi2 minima, and an unusually transparent listing of model limitations. If the conclusions hold, the paper makes a useful contribution by demonstrating that the broadband X-ray spectrum of 1H 0419-577 cannot uniquely distinguish a high-density relativistic reflection scenario from a warm-corona hybrid, and that the absence of a Compton hump need not imply a low hot-corona temperature. The finding that a high-density disc can mimic a lack of Compton hump is significant for the interpretation of NuSTAR spectra of luminous AGN. The main weakness is that the quantitative warm-corona interpretation leans on the reXcor grids, which are computed for an Eddington ratio of 0.1 while the source accretes at about 0.5-0.6 times Eddington, and which give a noticeably worse fit than the competing models.

major comments (3)
  1. [Appendix C, Table C.1, Section 4] The warm-corona heating fractions h_f ~ 0.40-0.70 and the statement that the soft X-ray excess is 'primarily dominated by warm corona emission' rest on reXcor grids computed for an Eddington accretion rate of mdot=0.1, while Section 3.4.2 finds mdot ~ 0.5-0.6 for this source. The paper itself notes in Appendix C that 'this assumption may not be appropriate for 1H 0419-577'. Furthermore, the best reXcor fit has chi2_red=1.30 with systematic residuals below 1 keV, whereas the high-density disc fits reach chi2_red ~ 1.07-1.08 and the comptt+reflkerrd hybrid reaches chi2_red=1.06. Because the reXcor grids are the most physical warm-corona implementation used, the quantitative h_f values are not robust grounds for the two-fold conclusion; the authors should either obtain or approximate grids at the appropriate accretion rate, or explicitly present the warm-corona case using only the comptt+reflkerrd and relagn models that are not affected by this mismatch.
  2. [Section 3.3 and Section 4] The high-density disc scenario requires an extreme coronal power fraction, f ~ 93% for reflkerrd and ~ 98% for relxillcp, as the authors compute using the Svensson & Zdziarski (1994) relation. This is in direct tension with the strong optical-UV bump observed in 1H 0419-577 and with the fact that the 0.3-79 keV luminosity is only about 20% of the bolometric luminosity. The paper acknowledges the difficulty but still counts the high-density disc model as a successful scenario. A quantitative consistency check, for example predicting the UV/optical disc emission from the fitted parameters or including a self-consistent reprocessing term, is needed before this scenario can be placed on equal footing with the hybrid model.
  3. [Section 3.2 vs Section 3.3] There is a very large discrepancy in the inferred hot corona temperature between the above-3-keV analysis (kT_hot ~ 17-28 keV for relxillcp and reflkerrd, Table 3) and the high-density broadband fits (kT_hot > 200 keV for relxillcp and ~ 420 keV for reflkerrd, Table 4 and Table A.1). The paper notes this but does not discuss whether the high-density models' kT_hot is physically meaningful or is an artifact of the soft-excess modelling that forces a hard continuum to compensate. Since the hot-corona temperature is a central physical quantity in both scenarios, this discrepancy deserves a dedicated exploration, for example by showing how the data constrain kT_hot in the high-density fits or by testing intermediate densities.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Figure 6 and Figure A.1] The captions refer to 'the third column of Table 6', but the relevant tables are Table 4 and Table A.1, respectively.
  2. [Figure B.1] The caption refers to 'Sect. 3.4.2' for the comptt+reflkerrd analysis, but this model is presented in Sect. 3.4.1.
  3. [Table B.1] The table note contains a duplicated '(a)' at the end of the note text.
  4. [Table 3] The abbreviation 'zga' is used without definition; it presumably stands for a Gaussian line model (zgauss) and should be defined in the table footnote.
  5. [Reference list] The citation to Niedzwiecki et al. (2019) appears with a broken accent character ('Nied´ zwiecki') in the text; this should be corrected to the proper spelling.
  6. [Section 3.4.1] The sentence introducing the simple hybrid model says 'using a simple modelling approach with the comptt model', which is clear, but the paragraph then refers to 'this scenario' several times; it would help to explicitly distinguish the comptt-based hybrid from the reXcor-based hybrid.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the two-fold conclusion is a model-comparison result from independent spectral fits to public grids; self-citations are contextual, and the reXcor mdot caveat is an external-grid limitation, not a circular step.

full rationale

The paper's load-bearing chain is data reduction, spectral fitting with two public model sets, and model comparison by chi-squared and parameter plausibility. No fitted quantity is defined in terms of another, and no uniqueness result is imported from the authors' prior work. The high-density disc fit (Table 4, chi2_red 1.08) and the warm-corona fits (Tables C.1 and 5, chi2_red 1.30 for the best reXcor grid) use disjoint parameter sets, are evaluated against the same data, and both poorer fits are reported. Appendix C explicitly flags that the reXcor grids assume mdot=0.1 while the source accretes at about 0.5-0.6; this is an external-grid applicability caveat and a validity concern, not a circular reduction, because the grid values are fixed inputs external to this paper, not outputs reinserted as evidence. Self-citations (e.g., Porquet et al. 2019, 2024a,b; Reeves et al. 2016, 2021b) are used for data-reduction conventions, previous model applications, and comparison sources; none is load-bearing for the present fits, which are justified by the reported chi-squared values and parameter constraints. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, no ansatz is smuggled in via citation, and no known result is merely relabeled. The central claim is therefore self-contained in the relevant sense; the noted limitations belong under correctness risk, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 10 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on a large set of fitted parameters in standard AGN spectral models, plus domain assumptions about reflection physics, warm-corona heating, and grid applicability. The two scenarios trade these parameters against each other: scenario 1 needs an extremely dense disc and near-total coronal power; scenario 2 needs a warm corona with optically thick, internally heated electrons. No new entities are introduced.

free parameters (10)
  • Disc density (log ne, cm^-3) = 18.1 (reflkerrd), 19.5 (relxillcp)
    Central fitted parameter of scenario 1, required to reproduce the soft X-ray excess without a warm corona (Tables 4 and A.1).
  • Hot corona temperature kThot = 17-28 keV (above 3 keV fits), 400-423 keV (broadband high-density), 44-46 keV (SED hybrid)
    Measured in every fit; the value is strongly model-dependent and is a key discriminator between the scenarios (Tables 3, 4, 5, A.1).
  • Reflection fraction R = 0.23-4.6 (depending on model and epoch)
    Free parameter in all reflection fits; controls the strength of the reflected component (Tables 3, 4, B.1).
  • Black hole spin a = 0.90-0.99 (reflection models), >=0.996 (SED)
    Free parameter in relxillcp/reflkerrd and relagn; inferred values differ between scenarios (Tables 4, A.1, 5).
  • Warm corona temperature kTwarm = 0.27-0.43 keV
    Free parameter in warm-corona models; central to scenario 2 (Tables B.1, 5).
  • Warm corona optical depth tau_warm = 12-17 (comptt and reXcor), 13-14 (SED)
    Free parameter; the large optical depth is a defining property of the warm corona scenario (Tables B.1, C.1, 5).
  • Mass accretion rate in Eddington units = log mdot = -0.20 to -0.26, i.e., Eddington ratio 0.5-0.6
    Free parameter in the relagn SED fit; high rate drives the compact geometry (Table 5).
  • Disc emissivity indices q1, q2 and break radius Rbr = q1 > 5, q2 ~ 3.1-4.4, Rbr ~ 2.4-6 Rg
    Free parameters in the broken emissivity law; the steep inner index is not physically motivated a priori (Table 4).
  • Iron abundance AFe = 0.6-2.4 (model dependent)
    Free parameter in reflection models; values differ strongly between reflkerrd and relxillcp fits (Tables 4, A.1).
  • Disc inclination angle theta = 21.6-41.1 degrees (or <=7.6 for one relxillcp solution)
    Free parameter; different scenarios prefer very different inclinations (Tables 4, A.1, 5).
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The relativistic reflection models (reflkerrd, relxillcp) correctly treat reflection from a high-density, highly ionized disc, including enhanced free-free emissivity at densities above 1e18 cm^-3.
    The high-density disc scenario depends on this model physics to reproduce the soft X-ray excess without a warm corona (Sect. 3.3, Tables 4 and A.1).
  • domain assumption A warm corona can be represented as an optically thick Comptonising region with sufficient internal heating to produce a smooth soft X-ray excess.
    The warm-corona scenarios (comptt, reXcor, relagn) rely on internal heating mechanisms that are treated as a free parameter and are not independently constrained (Sect. 4).
  • ad hoc to paper The reXcor grids computed for an Eddington accretion rate of 0.1 are adequate for 1H 0419-577, which is accreting at about 0.5 to 0.6 Eddington.
    The hybrid reXcor fits in Appendix C use the mdot=0.1 grids despite the higher source accretion rate; the authors note this may not be appropriate.
  • domain assumption The broad OVII line and the broad Fe Kalpha line originate from the inner accretion disc, anchoring the disc-reflection geometry.
    Sect. 3.1 interprets the OVII line with relativistic line and xstar emission models; if these lines arise elsewhere, the inferred radii and densities are not valid.
  • domain assumption The single-epoch UV mass estimate (log MBH/Msun = 8.123) and the adopted distance are accurate.
    The SED analysis in Sect. 3.4.2 converts fluxes to accretion rates and radii using this mass and distance.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A possible two-fold scenario for the disc-corona of the luminous AGN 1H 0419--577: a high-density disc or a warm corona." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3SHOI4BN

@misc{pith2026250623920,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A possible two-fold scenario for the disc-corona of the luminous AGN 1H 0419--577: a high-density disc or a warm corona},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3SHOI4BN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.23920}
}
read the original abstract

[abridged] 1H 0419-577 is a highly-accreting, luminous BLS1 AGN. This study aims to characterise its disc-corona system using, for the first time, simultaneous XMM-Newton and NuSTAR observations, performed in May and November 2018. We conducted high-resolution grating spectroscopy to identify potential soft X-ray absorption and emission features. To measure the hot corona temperatures from the spectral analysis above 3 keV, we also included data from a previous NuSTAR observation from June 2015. We characterised the disc-corona system properties by analysing the broadband spectra and the SED from UV to hard X-rays. 1H 0419-577 was observed in a bare-like high-flux state at both epochs, with negligible neutral and ionised absorption along its line of sight at both Galactic and AGN rest-frames. However, several soft X-ray emission lines were detected, notably a broad and intense OVII line indicating an accretion disc origin at only a few tens of gravitational radii. The broadband X-ray spectra revealed a prominent, absorption-free smooth soft X-ray excess, a weak Fe Kalpha complex, and a lack of a Compton hump. Fitting data above 3 keV yielded apparent moderate hot corona temperatures of ~20-30 keV for the 2018 and 2015 observations, depending on the model applied. The 2018 X-ray broadband spectra were well reproduced by either a relativistic reflection model with a high-density accretion disc (~10^18 cm^-2), or a hybrid model combining warm and hot coronae with relativistic reflection. We performed the SED analysis for the latter scenario, which indicated that both the hot and warm coronae would have a small spatial extent. Both scenarios can successfully reproduce the two 2018 observations of 1H 0419-577, but they imply very different physical conditions, for example, in terms of disc density, temperature and accretion power released in the hot corona and the origin of the UV emission.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.23920 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Data-to-model ratio of the two 2018 simultaneous XMM￾Newton-pn and NuSTAR spectra of 1H 0419-577 fit with a power-law model corrected for Galactic absorption over the 3–5 and 7–10 keV (AGN rest-frame) energy ranges and then extrapolated over the 0.3– 79 keV energy range. May 2018: XMM-Newton/pn (black) and NuS￾TAR (light grey). November 2018: XMM-Newton/pn (blue) and NuS￾TAR (light blue). 5 6 7 8 0.8 0.9 1 1.1 1.2 D… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Zoom-in on the Fe Kα line with pn data only (black: May 2018, and blue: November 2018). below approximately 0.5 keV between the two epochs. Only a weak but resolved Fe Kα complex is observed ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Residuals from a continuum (comptt plus powerlaw) model cor￾rected for Galactic absorption applied to the combined 2018 RGS spec￾trum [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Fit of the broad O vii emission line with a relativistic line model applied to the combined 2018 RGS spectrum. emission lines around the rest-frame energies of N vii Lyα, O vii, O viii, Ne ix, and Mg xi (see [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Fits above 3 keV of the two 2018 simultaneous XMM￾Newton/pn and NuSTAR spectra and of the 2015 NuSTAR spectra. The corresponding fit parameters are reported in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Data-to-model ratio of the two simultaneous May (black) and November (blue) 2018 XMM-Newton/pn and NuSTAR spectra over the 0.3–79 keV energy range, fit with the relflkerrd model. Top panel: The disc density (in log scale) is set to the default value of 15. The corre￾sp…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: SED fit from UV to hard X-rays of 1H 0419-577 using the relagn+reflkerrd model for the May (black) and November (blue) 2018 simultaneous XMM-Newton and NuSTAR. The values of the best￾fit parameters are reported in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

127 extracted references · 61 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    & Georgantopoulos , I

    Akylas , A. & Georgantopoulos , I. 2021, , 655, A60

    2021

  2. [2]

    Arnaud , K. A. 1996, in ASP Conf. Ser. 101: Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems V, ed. G. H. Jacoby & J. Barnes , 17

    1996

  3. [3]

    Ballantyne , D. R. 2020, , 491, 3553

    2020

  4. [4]

    R., Sudhakar , V., Fairfax , D., et al

    Ballantyne , D. R., Sudhakar , V., Fairfax , D., et al. 2024, , 530, 1603

    2024

  5. [5]

    Ballantyne , D. R. & Xiang , X. 2020, , 496, 4255

    2020

  6. [6]

    2007, , 467, L19

    Bianchi , S., Guainazzi , M., Matt , G., & Fonseca Bonilla , N. 2007, , 467, L19

    2007

  7. [7]

    2009, , 495, 421

    Bianchi , S., Guainazzi , M., Matt , G., Fonseca Bonilla , N., & Ponti , G. 2009, , 495, 421

    2009

  8. [8]

    Brissenden , R. J. V., Tuohy , I. R., Remillard , R. A., et al. 1987, , 7, 212

    1987

Show all 127 references
  1. [9]

    2025, , 980, 23

    Chen , S.-J., Wang , J.-X., Kang , J.-L., et al. 2025, , 980, 23

    2025

  2. [10]

    2022, , 940, 50

    Chen , Y.-Q., Liu , Y.-S., & Bian , W.-H. 2022, , 940, 50

    2022

  3. [11]

    2013, , 430, 1694

    Dauser , T., Garcia , J., Wilms , J., et al. 2013, , 430, 1694

    2013

  4. [12]

    S., & Brenneman , L

    Dauser , T., Wilms , J., Reynolds , C. S., & Brenneman , L. W. 2010, , 409, 1534

    2010

  5. [13]

    L., Guainazzi , M., et al

    de La Calle P \'e rez , I., Longinotti , A. L., Guainazzi , M., et al. 2010, , 524, A50

    2010

  6. [14]

    W., Brinkman , A

    den Herder , J. W., Brinkman , A. C., Kahn , S. M., et al. 2001, , 365, L7

    2001

  7. [15]

    2014, , 563, A95

    Di Gesu , L., Costantini , E., Piconcelli , E., et al. 2014, , 563, A95

    2014

  8. [16]

    2017, , 608, A115

    Di Gesu , L., Costantini , E., Piconcelli , E., et al. 2017, , 608, A115

    2017

  9. [17]

    A., Kallman , T

    Ding , Y., Garc a , J. A., Kallman , T. R., et al. 2024, , 974, 280

    2024

  10. [18]

    W., Jin , C., Blaes , O., & Ward , M

    Done , C., Davis , S. W., Jin , C., Blaes , O., & Ward , M. 2012, , 420, 1848

    2012

  11. [19]

    2004, , 153, 205

    Dov c iak , M., Karas , V., & Yaqoob , T. 2004, , 153, 205

    2004

  12. [20]

    2019, , 870, 123

    Edelson , R., Gelbord , J., Cackett , E., et al. 2019, , 870, 123

    2019

  13. [21]

    E., McHardy , I

    Emmanoulopoulos , D., Papadakis , I. E., McHardy , I. M., et al. 2011, , 415, 1895

    2011

  14. [22]

    C., Lohfink , A., Belmont , R., Malzac , J., & Coppi , P

    Fabian , A. C., Lohfink , A., Belmont , R., Malzac , J., & Coppi , P. 2017, , 467, 2566

    2017

  15. [23]

    C., Lohfink , A., Kara , E., et al

    Fabian , A. C., Lohfink , A., Kara , E., et al. 2015, , 451, 4375

    2015

  16. [24]

    C., Miniutti , G., Iwasawa , K., & Ross , R

    Fabian , A. C., Miniutti , G., Iwasawa , K., & Ross , R. R. 2005, , 361, 795

    2005

  17. [25]

    2011, , 727, 19

    Fukazawa , Y., Hiragi , K., Mizuno , M., et al. 2011, , 727, 19

    2011

  18. [26]

    A., Fabian , A

    Garc \' a , J. A., Fabian , A. C., Kallman , T. R., et al. 2016, , 462, 751

    2016

  19. [27]

    A., Kara , E., Walton , D., et al

    Garc \' a , J. A., Kara , E., Walton , D., et al. 2019, , 871, 88

    2019

  20. [28]

    E., Bianchi , S., Kammoun , E., et al

    Gianolli , V. E., Bianchi , S., Kammoun , E., et al. 2024, , 691, A29

    2024

  21. [29]

    E., Kim , D

    Gianolli , V. E., Kim , D. E., Bianchi , S., et al. 2023, , 523, 4468

    2023

  22. [30]

    Grandi , S. A. 1982, , 255, 25

    1982

  23. [31]

    2023, , 675, A198

    Gronkiewicz , D., R \'o \.z a \'n ska , A., Petrucci , P.-O., & Belmont , R. 2023, , 675, A198

    2023

  24. [32]

    2006, Astronomische Nachrichten, 327, 1032

    Guainazzi , M., Bianchi , S., & Dov c iak , M. 2006, Astronomische Nachrichten, 327, 1032

    2006

  25. [33]

    M., et al

    Guainazzi , M., Comastri , A., Stirpe , G. M., et al. 1998, , 339, 327

    1998

  26. [34]

    & Done , C

    Hagen , S. & Done , C. 2023 a , , 525, 3455

    2023

  27. [35]

    & Done , C

    Hagen , S. & Done , C. 2023 b , , 521, 251

    2023

  28. [36]

    A., Craig , W

    Harrison , F. A., Craig , W. W., Christensen , F. E., et al. 2013, , 770, 103

    2013

  29. [37]

    2016, , 594, A116

    HI4PI Collaboration , Ben Bekhti , N., Fl \"o er , L., et al. 2016, , 594, A116

    2016

  30. [38]

    2023, , 525, 5437

    Ingram , A., Ewing , M., Marinucci , A., et al. 2023, , 525, 5437

    2023

  31. [39]

    & Taniguchi , Y

    Iwasawa , K. & Taniguchi , Y. 1993, , 413, L15

    1993

  32. [40]

    2001, , 365, L1

    Jansen , F., Lumb , D., Altieri , B., et al. 2001, , 365, L1

    2001

  33. [41]

    C., Dauser , T., et al

    Jiang , J., Fabian , A. C., Dauser , T., et al. 2019 a , , 489, 3436

    2019

  34. [42]

    J., Fabian , A

    Jiang , J., Walton , D. J., Fabian , A. C., & Parker , M. L. 2019 b , , 483, 2958

    2019

  35. [43]

    & Bautista , M

    Kallman , T. & Bautista , M. 2001, , 133, 221

    2001

  36. [44]

    A., et al

    Kamraj , N., Brightman , M., Harrison , F. A., et al. 2022, , 927, 42

    2022

  37. [45]

    & Wang , J.-X

    Kang , J.-L. & Wang , J.-X. 2022, , 929, 141

    2022

  38. [46]

    2021, , 502, 80

    Kang , J.-L., Wang , J.-X., & Kang , W.-Y. 2021, , 502, 80

    2021

  39. [47]

    & Garc \' a , J

    Kara , E. & Garc \' a , J. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2503.22791

    2025 arXiv

  40. [48]

    A., Lohfink , A., et al

    Kara , E., Garc \' a , J. A., Lohfink , A., et al. 2017, , 468, 3489

    2017

  41. [49]

    & Mineshige , S

    Kawanaka , N. & Mineshige , S. 2024, , 76, 306

    2024

  42. [50]

    & Ballantyne , D

    Keek , L. & Ballantyne , D. R. 2016, , 456, 2722

    2016

  43. [51]

    & Done , C

    Kubota , A. & Done , C. 2018, , 480, 1247

    2018

  44. [52]

    J., et al

    Lewin , C., Kara , E., Barth , A. J., et al. 2024, , 974, 271

    2024

  45. [53]

    & Wang , J.-X

    Liu , T. & Wang , J.-X. 2010, , 725, 2381

    2010

  46. [54]

    P., Porquet , D., Reeves , J

    Lobban , A. P., Porquet , D., Reeves , J. N., et al. 2018, , 474, 3237

    2018

  47. [55]

    M., Reynolds , C

    Lohfink , A. M., Reynolds , C. S., Pinto , C., et al. 2016, , 821, 11

    2016

  48. [56]

    2025, , 985, 185

    Ma , Q.-Q., Gu , W.-M., Cai , Z.-Y., et al. 2025, , 985, 185

    2025

  49. [57]

    J., Garc \' a , J., et al

    Madathil-Pottayil , A., Walton , D. J., Garc \' a , J., et al. 2024, , 534, 608

    2024

  50. [58]

    N., Parker , M

    Mallick , L., Alston , W. N., Parker , M. L., et al. 2018, , 479, 615

    2018

  51. [59]

    C., Garc \' a , J

    Mallick , L., Fabian , A. C., Garc \' a , J. A., et al. 2022, , 513, 4361

    2022

  52. [60]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2501.15380

    Mallick , L., Pinto , C., Tomsick , J., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2501.15380

    2025 arXiv

  53. [61]

    2022, , 516, 5907

    Marinucci , A., Muleri , F., Dovciak , M., et al. 2022, , 516, 5907

    2022

  54. [62]

    O., Breeveld , A., Much , R., et al

    Mason , K. O., Breeveld , A., Much , R., et al. 2001, , 365, L36

    2001

  55. [63]

    H., Knigge , C., Higginbottom , N., et al

    Matthews , J. H., Knigge , C., Higginbottom , N., et al. 2020, , 492, 5540

    2020

  56. [64]

    A., Nardini , E., Parker , M

    Matzeu , G. A., Nardini , E., Parker , M. L., et al. 2020, , 497, 2352

    2020

  57. [65]

    M., Connolly , S

    McHardy , I. M., Connolly , S. D., Horne , K., et al. 2018, , 480, 2881

    2018

  58. [66]

    S., et al

    Mehdipour , M., Branduardi-Raymont , G., Kaastra , J. S., et al. 2011, , 534, A39

    2011

  59. [67]

    S., Kriss , G

    Mehdipour , M., Kaastra , J. S., Kriss , G. A., et al. 2015, , 575, A22

    2015

  60. [68]

    A., Kaastra , J

    Mehdipour , M., Kriss , G. A., Kaastra , J. S., Costantini , E., & Mao , J. 2023, , 952, L5

    2023

  61. [69]

    O., et al

    Middei , R., Bianchi , S., Petrucci , P. O., et al. 2019, , 483, 4695

    2019

  62. [70]

    O., Bianchi , S., et al

    Middei , R., Petrucci , P. O., Bianchi , S., et al. 2023, , 672, A101

    2023

  63. [71]

    Mitchell , J. A. J., Done , C., Ward , M. J., et al. 2023, , 524, 1796

    2023

  64. [72]

    & McCammon , D

    Morrison , R. & McCammon , D. 1983, , 270, 119

    1983

  65. [73]

    Nied \'z wiecki , A., Szanecki , M., & Zdziarski , A. A. 2019, , 485, 2942

    2019

  66. [74]

    L., O'Brien , P

    Page , K. L., O'Brien , P. T., Reeves , J. N., & Turner , M. J. L. 2004, , 347, 316

    2004

  67. [75]

    2024, , 976, 145

    Pal , I., Anju , A., Sreehari , H., et al. 2024, , 976, 145

    2024

  68. [76]

    & Stalin , C

    Pal , I. & Stalin , C. S. 2023, , 518, 2529

    2023

  69. [77]

    O., et al

    Palit , B., R \'o \.z a \'n ska , A., Petrucci , P. O., et al. 2024, , 690, A308

    2024

  70. [78]

    2025, , 540, L14

    Palit , B., \'S niegowska , M., Markowitz , A., et al. 2025, , 540, L14

    2025

  71. [79]

    2022, , 935, 93

    Panagiotou , C., Papadakis , I., Kara , E., Kammoun , E., & Dov c iak , M. 2022, , 935, 93

    2022

  72. [80]

    R., Cackett , E

    Partington , E. R., Cackett , E. M., Edelson , R., et al. 2024, , 977, 77

    2024

  73. [81]

    R., Reeves , J

    Patrick , A. R., Reeves , J. N., Porquet , D., et al. 2012, , 426, 2522

    2012

  74. [82]

    O., Gronkiewicz , D., Rozanska , A., et al

    Petrucci , P. O., Gronkiewicz , D., Rozanska , A., et al. 2020, , 634, A85

    2020

  75. [83]

    2018, , 611, A59

    Petrucci , P.-O., Ursini , F., De Rosa , A., et al. 2018, , 611, A59

    2018

  76. [84]

    2020, , 641, A6

    Planck Collaboration , Aghanim , N., Akrami , Y., et al. 2020, , 641, A6

    2020

  77. [85]

    N., et al

    Porquet , D., Done , C., Reeves , J. N., et al. 2019, , 623, A11

    2019

  78. [86]

    2010, , 157, 103

    Porquet , D., Dubau , J., & Grosso , N. 2010, , 157, 103

    2010

  79. [87]

    2024 a , , 681, A40

    Porquet , D., Hagen , S., Grosso , N., et al. 2024 a , , 681, A40

    2024

  80. [88]

    N., Grosso , N., Braito , V., & Lobban , A

    Porquet , D., Reeves , J. N., Grosso , N., Braito , V., & Lobban , A. 2021, , 654, A89

    2021

  81. [89]

    N., Hagen , S., et al

    Porquet , D., Reeves , J. N., Hagen , S., et al. 2024 b , , 689, A336

    2024

  82. [90]

    N., Matt , G., et al

    Porquet , D., Reeves , J. N., Matt , G., et al. 2018, , 609, A42

    2018

  83. [91]

    N., O'Brien , P., & Brinkmann , W

    Porquet , D., Reeves , J. N., O'Brien , P., & Brinkmann , W. 2004, , 422, 85

    2004

  84. [92]

    A., Reeves , J

    Pounds , K. A., Reeves , J. N., Page , K. L., & O'Brien , P. T. 2004 a , , 605, 670

    2004

  85. [93]

    A., Reeves , J

    Pounds , K. A., Reeves , J. N., Page , K. L., & O'Brien , P. T. 2004 b , , 616, 696

    2004

  86. [94]

    & Svensson , R

    Poutanen , J. & Svensson , R. 1996, , 470, 249

    1996

  87. [95]

    N., Braito , V., Porquet , D., et al

    Reeves , J. N., Braito , V., Porquet , D., et al. 2021 a , , 500, 1974

    2021

  88. [96]

    N., Porquet , D., Braito , V., Grosso , N., & Lobban , A

    Reeves , J. N., Porquet , D., Braito , V., Grosso , N., & Lobban , A. 2021 b , , 649, L3

    2021

  89. [97]

    N., Porquet , D., Braito , V., et al

    Reeves , J. N., Porquet , D., Braito , V., et al. 2016, , 828, 98

    2016

  90. [98]

    C., Fabian , A

    Ricci , C., Ho , L. C., Fabian , A. C., et al. 2018, , 480, 1819

    2018

  91. [99]

    2014, , 567, A142

    Ricci , C., Ueda , Y., Ichikawa , K., et al. 2014, , 567, A142

    2014

  92. [100]

    2015, , 580, A77

    R \'o \.z a \'n ska , A., Malzac , J., Belmont , R., Czerny , B., & Petrucci , P.-O. 2015, , 580, A77

    2015

  93. [101]

    Schlafly , E. F. & Finkbeiner , D. P. 2011, , 737, 103

    2011

  94. [102]

    2024, , 690, A145

    Serafinelli , R., De Rosa , A., Tortosa , A., et al. 2024, , 690, A145

    2024

  95. [103]

    W., Yaqoob , T., & Wang , J

    Shu , X. W., Yaqoob , T., & Wang , J. X. 2010, , 187, 581

    2010

  96. [104]

    2001, , 365, L18

    Str \"u der , L., Briel , U., Dennerl , K., et al. 2001, , 365, L18

    2001

  97. [105]

    & Zdziarski , A

    Svensson , R. & Zdziarski , A. A. 1994, , 436, 599

    1994

  98. [106]

    2023, , 525, 4735

    Tagliacozzo , D., Marinucci , A., Ursini , F., et al. 2023, , 525, 4735

    2023

  99. [107]

    Tilton , E. M. & Shull , J. M. 2013, , 774, 67

    2013

  100. [108]

    1994, , 434, 570

    Titarchuk , L. 1994, , 434, 570

    1994

  101. [109]

    2017, , 466, 4193

    Tortosa , A., Marinucci , A., Matt , G., et al. 2017, , 466, 4193

    2017

  102. [110]

    2022, , 509, 3599

    Tortosa , A., Ricci , C., Tombesi , F., et al. 2022, , 509, 3599

    2022

  103. [111]

    M., et al

    Troyer , J., Starkey , D., Cackett , E. M., et al. 2016, , 456, 4040

    2016

  104. [112]

    Turner , M. J. L., Abbey , A., Arnaud , M., et al. 2001, , 365, L27

    2001

  105. [113]

    J., George , I

    Turner , T. J., George , I. M., Grupe , D., et al. 1999, , 510, 178

    1999

  106. [114]

    J., Reeves , J

    Turner , T. J., Reeves , J. N., Braito , V., & Costa , M. 2018, , 476, 1258

    2018

  107. [115]

    2016, , 463, 382

    Ursini , F., Petrucci , P.-O., Matt , G., et al. 2016, , 463, 382

    2016

  108. [116]

    2024, , 688, A189

    Vaia , B., Ursini , F., Matt , G., et al. 2024, , 688, A189

    2024

  109. [117]

    A., Ferland , G

    Verner , D. A., Ferland , G. J., Korista , K. T., & Yakovlev , D. G. 1996, , 465, 487

    1996

  110. [118]

    M., McHardy , I., Hern \'a ndez Santisteban , J

    Vincentelli , F. M., McHardy , I., Hern \'a ndez Santisteban , J. V., et al. 2022, , 512, L33

    2022

  111. [119]

    Willingale , R., Starling , R. L. C., Beardmore , A. P., Tanvir , N. R., & O'Brien , P. T. 2013, , 431, 394

    2013

  112. [120]

    2000, , 542, 914

    Wilms , J., Allen , A., & McCray , R. 2000, , 542, 914

    2000

  113. [121]

    Wright , E. L. 2006, , 118, 1711

    2006

  114. [122]

    R., Bianchi , S., et al

    Xiang , X., Ballantyne , D. R., Bianchi , S., et al. 2022, , 515, 353

    2022

  115. [123]

    A., Walton , D

    Xu , Y., Garc \' a , J. A., Walton , D. J., et al. 2021, , 913, 13

    2021

  116. [124]

    A., Johnson , W

    Zdziarski , A. A., Johnson , W. N., & Magdziarz , P. 1996, , 283, 193

    1996

  117. [125]

    2018, , 863, 71

    Zhang , J.-X., Wang , J.-X., & Zhu , F.-F. 2018, , 863, 71

    2018

  118. [126]

    2023, , 949, 4

    Zhang , Z., Jiang , J., Liu , H., et al. 2023, , 949, 4

    2023

  119. [127]

    T., Done , C., & Smith , D

    \.Z ycki , P. T., Done , C., & Smith , D. A. 1999, , 309, 561

    1999

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.